This document analyzes the types of presuppositions used in the Disney animated film Frozen. It begins with an introduction to presupposition and why Frozen was chosen for analysis. It then outlines Yule's (1996) six types of presupposition: existential, factive, lexical, structural, counterfactual, and non-factive. Examples of each type are identified from conversations in Frozen, such as "Born with the powers or the curse?" containing an existential presupposition. In total, 100 presuppositions from Frozen were classified, with existential being most common at 23%. The analysis finds Frozen effectively utilizes various presupposition types in character dialog.
This document discusses the concepts of presupposition and entailment in language. It defines presupposition as what a speaker assumes to be true prior to making an utterance, whereas entailment is what logically follows from an assertion. The document examines different types of presuppositions including existential, factive, and lexical presuppositions. It also discusses properties of presuppositions like constancy under negation. Entailment is defined as a logical relationship where one proposition necessarily follows from another. The relationship between presupposition and entailment is explored, noting they can be distinguished based on negation tests and whether sentences or speakers have them.
The document discusses presuppositions and entailments. Presuppositions are assumptions that a speaker expects the listener to know, such as implicit meanings conveyed through language. Entailments are logical consequences that follow from what is said. Speakers have presuppositions while sentences have entailments. There are different types of presuppositions including existential, factive, and structural presuppositions. Entailments refer to an implicational relationship between sentences where the truth of one guarantees the truth of the other. Presuppositions remain even when a statement is negated, unlike entailments.
This document summarizes a research paper on presuppositions found in the movie The Conjuring. The key points are:
1) The research analyzed utterances from the movie using Yule's theory of presupposition to identify 6 types of presupposition.
2) A total of 23 presuppositions were found, with lexical presupposition being the most common at 9 instances.
3) All types of presupposition in Yule's theory were identified, with counterfactual presupposition being the least common with only 1 instance.
Pragmatics is the study of meaning beyond the words themselves. It examines speaker meaning, contextual meaning, and how more is communicated than is said through things like deixis, inference, presupposition, speech acts, and politeness. Pragmatics helps explain how context, both linguistic and physical, affects meaning and allows people to communicate indirectly. Understanding pragmatics is important for comprehending intentions and avoiding cross-cultural misunderstandings in communication.
Pragmatics is the study of meaning beyond the words themselves. It examines speaker meaning, contextual meaning, and how more is communicated than is said through things like deixis, inference, presupposition, speech acts, and politeness. Pragmatics helps explain how context, both linguistic and physical, affects meaning and allows people to communicate indirectly. Understanding pragmatics is important for comprehending intentions and avoiding cross-cultural misunderstandings in communication.
Pragmatics is the study of meaning beyond the words themselves. It examines speaker meaning, contextual meaning, and how more is communicated than is said through things like deixis, inference, presupposition, speech acts, and politeness. Pragmatics helps explain how context, both linguistic and physical, affects meaning and allows people to communicate indirectly. Understanding pragmatics is important for comprehending intention and avoiding cross-cultural misunderstandings in communication.
Pragmatics is the study of contextual meaning, speaker meaning, and how more is communicated than what is explicitly said. It involves the study of invisible meaning, deixis, reference, inference, presupposition, speech acts, and politeness. Pragmatics examines how context, both linguistic and physical, affects meaning, and how language is used to manage social relationships and interactions.
Pragmatics is the study of meaning beyond the words themselves. It examines how context, including linguistic context, physical context, and cultural context, influence meaning. Some key aspects of pragmatics include deixis, which examines words that depend on context like pronouns; inference, which is how listeners understand implied meaning; presupposition, which are assumptions in language; and politeness, which looks at how language is used to maintain social relationships and self-image. Understanding pragmatics is important for comprehending intention and avoiding cross-cultural misunderstandings.
This document discusses the concepts of presupposition and entailment in language. It defines presupposition as what a speaker assumes to be true prior to making an utterance, whereas entailment is what logically follows from an assertion. The document examines different types of presuppositions including existential, factive, and lexical presuppositions. It also discusses properties of presuppositions like constancy under negation. Entailment is defined as a logical relationship where one proposition necessarily follows from another. The relationship between presupposition and entailment is explored, noting they can be distinguished based on negation tests and whether sentences or speakers have them.
The document discusses presuppositions and entailments. Presuppositions are assumptions that a speaker expects the listener to know, such as implicit meanings conveyed through language. Entailments are logical consequences that follow from what is said. Speakers have presuppositions while sentences have entailments. There are different types of presuppositions including existential, factive, and structural presuppositions. Entailments refer to an implicational relationship between sentences where the truth of one guarantees the truth of the other. Presuppositions remain even when a statement is negated, unlike entailments.
This document summarizes a research paper on presuppositions found in the movie The Conjuring. The key points are:
1) The research analyzed utterances from the movie using Yule's theory of presupposition to identify 6 types of presupposition.
2) A total of 23 presuppositions were found, with lexical presupposition being the most common at 9 instances.
3) All types of presupposition in Yule's theory were identified, with counterfactual presupposition being the least common with only 1 instance.
Pragmatics is the study of meaning beyond the words themselves. It examines speaker meaning, contextual meaning, and how more is communicated than is said through things like deixis, inference, presupposition, speech acts, and politeness. Pragmatics helps explain how context, both linguistic and physical, affects meaning and allows people to communicate indirectly. Understanding pragmatics is important for comprehending intentions and avoiding cross-cultural misunderstandings in communication.
Pragmatics is the study of meaning beyond the words themselves. It examines speaker meaning, contextual meaning, and how more is communicated than is said through things like deixis, inference, presupposition, speech acts, and politeness. Pragmatics helps explain how context, both linguistic and physical, affects meaning and allows people to communicate indirectly. Understanding pragmatics is important for comprehending intentions and avoiding cross-cultural misunderstandings in communication.
Pragmatics is the study of meaning beyond the words themselves. It examines speaker meaning, contextual meaning, and how more is communicated than is said through things like deixis, inference, presupposition, speech acts, and politeness. Pragmatics helps explain how context, both linguistic and physical, affects meaning and allows people to communicate indirectly. Understanding pragmatics is important for comprehending intention and avoiding cross-cultural misunderstandings in communication.
Pragmatics is the study of contextual meaning, speaker meaning, and how more is communicated than what is explicitly said. It involves the study of invisible meaning, deixis, reference, inference, presupposition, speech acts, and politeness. Pragmatics examines how context, both linguistic and physical, affects meaning, and how language is used to manage social relationships and interactions.
Pragmatics is the study of meaning beyond the words themselves. It examines how context, including linguistic context, physical context, and cultural context, influence meaning. Some key aspects of pragmatics include deixis, which examines words that depend on context like pronouns; inference, which is how listeners understand implied meaning; presupposition, which are assumptions in language; and politeness, which looks at how language is used to maintain social relationships and self-image. Understanding pragmatics is important for comprehending intention and avoiding cross-cultural misunderstandings.
Pragmatics is the study of contextual meaning and how more is communicated than what is explicitly said. It examines invisible meanings, inferences, and assumptions that arise from linguistic and physical context. Key aspects of pragmatics include deixis, which are expressions like pronouns that depend on context to be understood, and speech acts, such as requests, that depend on context and politeness conventions. Politeness aims to save face by mitigating threats to people's self-image and sense of independence or belonging.
The document provides an overview of critical reasoning and the philosophy course. It discusses:
1) The objectives of learning to think rationally and challenge others' reasoning, using logic to evaluate inferences.
2) The basic laws of logic like modus ponens and modus tollens, and how they dictate valid inferences using sentence letters.
3) What constitutes an argument, including premises, conclusions, and how to recognize arguments by looking for conclusion and premise indicators.
The document discusses the concepts of presupposition and entailment in language. Presuppositions are assumptions that speakers convey through their use of language, such as assuming information is already known by listeners. Entailments are logical implications that follow from what is directly stated. The key differences are that presuppositions do not change under negation, while sentences rather than speakers have entailments. Examples are provided to illustrate presuppositions conveyed through lexical items, structures, and types of verbs.
This document provides an overview of presupposition. It begins with a definition, stating that presuppositions are implications that are assumed to already be known by the listener. It then discusses six types of presuppositions: existential, factive, lexical, structural, non-factive, and counterfactual. Examples are provided for each type. Common presupposition triggers are also outlined, including definite descriptions, factive predicates, counterfactual conditionals, change of state verbs, temporal clauses, cleft sentences, questions, and others. Entailment is briefly defined as well.
Essay On Child Labour In India. Child labour problems essayMorgan Hampton
Child Labour in India: Causes, Consequences, Laws | UPSC Essay - IAS .... Free Sample Essay on Child Labour in India. (PDF) Child Labour in India: Causes and Consequences. Child Labour Act in India | Essay Preparation For UPSC Exam. Essay About Child Labour In India - thesistemplate.web.fc2.com. Scholarship essay: Child labour in india essay. Child Labour Essay in English for School Students, Kids and Children. Presentation on Child labour in India. Data Story : Child Labour In India - GS SCORE. Essay On Child Labour In India For Students – Read Here – Essay Avenue. literature review of child labour in india. Essay On Child Labour In India – jynuzecys. Child labour problems essay. Essay On Child Labour In India 1500+ Words Pdf. Who Is Child Labour Essay | Sitedoct.org. child labour essays | Child Labour | Labour Economics. Child Labour in India | International Labour Organization | Child Labour. Essay on child labour || Child labour essay in english. Child Labour Essay for School Students in English Essay on Child Labour. The problem of child labour in india essay - internetupdater.web.fc2.com. Essay on Child labour in English for Class 1 to 12 Students. Essay on Child Labour | 900+ Words Paragraph on Child Labour. Child Labour Essay in English for Students. बाल मजदूरी पर निबंध ।। Essay On Child Labour - YouTube. How India has curbed child labour - Rediff.com Business. Essay: Child Labour - Surya Xetri. Causes Of Child Labour Essay In Hindi | Sitedoct.org. Child Labour Essay in English - Indo Moral Tales.
This document discusses logical fallacies and their types. It defines a logical fallacy as a mistake in reasoning. Fallacies are divided into two types: fallacies of relevance, where the premises are irrelevant to the conclusion, and fallacies of insufficient evidence, where the premises do not provide enough evidence to support the conclusion. Several specific fallacies are defined, including personal attacks, attacking the motive, the "two wrongs make a right" fallacy, ambiguity, and discussions of intension vs. extension.
This document provides an overview of pragmatics from a lecture. It defines pragmatics as the study of speaker meaning, contextual meaning, and how more is communicated than what is said. It discusses key concepts in pragmatics including invisible meaning, context, deixis, reference, inference, anaphora, presupposition, speech acts, and politeness. Politeness involves face-saving acts that minimize threats to people's self-image and independence or connection to others. The appropriate interpretation of language depends on context and can differ across cultures.
The document discusses the concept of presupposition in linguistics. It defines presupposition as a background belief that is mutually assumed by the speaker and listener for an utterance to be appropriate. There are several types of presuppositions, including existential, factive, lexical, structural, non-factive, and counterfactual presuppositions. The document provides examples for each type and discusses how presuppositions can project, or not project, when combined in more complex sentences.
This document defines and provides examples of various types of formal and informal fallacies. Formal fallacies are errors in reasoning based on logical form, while informal fallacies occur in everyday discourse. Some fallacies can be unintentional, but others are intentional ways to deceive people. The document then outlines specific fallacies such as fallacies of ambiguity involving unclear meanings, fallacies of relevance using irrelevant premises or conclusions, fallacies of presumption making unjustified assumptions, and fallacies of indefinite induction drawing conclusions from insufficient samples. Examples are provided for each fallacy type.
SEMANTICS AND PRAGMATICS - PRESUPPOSITIONS AND ENTAILMENTSMusfera Nara Vadia
This document discusses the concepts of presupposition and entailment in linguistics. It defines presupposition as something the speaker assumes to be true prior to making an utterance, while entailment is something that logically follows from what is asserted in an utterance. The document provides examples and types of presuppositions including existential, factive, lexical, structural, non-factive, and counter-factual presuppositions. It also discusses entailments and how they differ from presuppositions in depending on sentence meaning rather than context. The document concludes by explaining the projection problem with presuppositions and how foreground and background entailments can indicate intended meaning.
Slang language الدكتور كرار رأفت علوش < Dr. karrar raafat alwashDr. Karrar Alwash
This document discusses slang language and metaphors. It begins by defining slang and explaining how slang evolves based on generational differences and group membership. It then defines metaphors and provides examples of common metaphors. The document discusses different types of metaphors, including implied metaphors, sustained metaphors, dead metaphors, and mixed metaphors. It concludes by outlining the key elements involved in the working mechanism of a metaphor, including the metaphor producer and receiver, the source and target domains, and the role of context.
Pragmatics is the study of contextual meaning and speaker meaning. It examines how context contributes to meaning. Some key concepts in pragmatics include deixis, which examines words like I, you, here, and now that depend on context; presupposition, which are assumptions in language; speech acts, which are actions performed through language like requests or promises; and politeness, which is using language to respect face or self-image. Pragmatics analyzes how people communicate beyond just the words themselves.
1. The document discusses the key concepts of logic including arguments, propositions, premises, conclusions and the validity of arguments.
2. It provides examples to illustrate inductive and deductive arguments, and distinguishes between arguments and explanations.
3. Arguments are considered valid if the truth of the premises necessarily implies the truth of the conclusion, while invalid arguments can have true premises and conclusions but the conclusion does not logically follow.
The document discusses various types and theories of presupposition. It defines presupposition as information that a speaker assumes is already known by listeners. There are different types of presuppositions triggered by lexical items and grammatical constructions, such as existential, factive, and structural presuppositions. Theories view presupposition as either a property of sentences (semantic view) or of speaker beliefs (pragmatic view). Presuppositions are assumed to be part of the common ground between speakers but can be introduced through accommodation.
Understanding arguments, reasoning and hypothesesMaria Rosala
As researchers working in government, influencing service design, we need to know that our research is methodologically sound, our research findings are grounded in empirical data and our recommendations are logically derived.
'Understanding arguments, reasoning and hypotheses' is the first in a series of 5 short courses, covering introduction courses to various aspects of methodology in research, from the use of grounded theory in discovery research, to hypothesis testing and sampling in more experimental research.
In this course, you'll learn:
About arguments
- what we mean by an argument
- how to identify a valid/invalid argument
- what we mean by premises
- what validity and soundness of arguments mean
About reasoning
- what is deductive reasoning and where do we use it
- what is inductive reasoning and where do we use it
- what is abductive reasoning and where do we use it
About hypotheses
- what is a hypotheses and a null hypothesis
- how do we test them
Semantics iv proposition and presuppositionBrian Malone
This document summarizes key concepts about propositions and presuppositions from semantics. It defines propositions as statements that can be evaluated as true or false based on certain truth conditions. Even propositions that are not factually true can still be meaningful if they have identifiable truth conditions. Presuppositions refer to implicit assumptions in utterances about shared background knowledge between speakers. The example given presupposes the reader's familiarity with daily COVID-19 briefings from the White House. Analyzing presuppositions provides insights into implicature and how speakers communicate beyond just the literal meaning of words.
The document discusses presupposition and entailment in linguistics. It defines presupposition as assumptions a speaker holds prior to making an utterance. There are different types of presupposition including existential, factive, lexical, structural, counterfactual, and negative presuppositions. Entailment is defined as logical implications of what is asserted in an utterance, where sentences rather than speakers have entailments. Examples are provided to illustrate presuppositions conveyed by sentences and the difference between presupposition and entailment.
This document discusses key concepts in sentence semantics and propositional logic. It defines sentences, utterances and propositions. A proposition is conceived as an abstract string of words that can be true or false depending on the state of affairs. The document also discusses truth conditions and how knowing the meaning of a sentence involves knowing when it is true or false. It introduces concepts of formal semantics like models and model theory. Finally, it discusses word meaning, propositions, entailment, predicate logic and propositional logic.
This document discusses relative clauses in Vietnamese, including:
- Definitions of relative clauses and how they are used to provide additional information about a noun or pronoun.
- Relative pronouns like who, whom, whose, which, that and relative adverbs like when, where, why.
- Types of relative clauses including restrictive, non-restrictive, and successive clauses.
- Ways relative clauses can be shortened including using participial phrases and infinitive phrases.
- Notes on using relative clauses including when that can be used and cases where the relative pronoun is optional.
Pragmatics is the study of meaning in context and speaker meaning. It examines how context influences meaning. For example, in the conversation about renting an apartment, the full meaning is only understood when considering the context that one person has a dog. Pragmatics also examines presuppositions, speech acts, politeness, and relevance theory. Relevance theory proposes that utterance interpretation focuses on contextually relevant information that produces an effect.
Pragmatics is the study of contextual meaning and how more is communicated than what is explicitly said. It examines invisible meanings, inferences, and assumptions that arise from linguistic and physical context. Key aspects of pragmatics include deixis, which are expressions like pronouns that depend on context to be understood, and speech acts, such as requests, that depend on context and politeness conventions. Politeness aims to save face by mitigating threats to people's self-image and sense of independence or belonging.
The document provides an overview of critical reasoning and the philosophy course. It discusses:
1) The objectives of learning to think rationally and challenge others' reasoning, using logic to evaluate inferences.
2) The basic laws of logic like modus ponens and modus tollens, and how they dictate valid inferences using sentence letters.
3) What constitutes an argument, including premises, conclusions, and how to recognize arguments by looking for conclusion and premise indicators.
The document discusses the concepts of presupposition and entailment in language. Presuppositions are assumptions that speakers convey through their use of language, such as assuming information is already known by listeners. Entailments are logical implications that follow from what is directly stated. The key differences are that presuppositions do not change under negation, while sentences rather than speakers have entailments. Examples are provided to illustrate presuppositions conveyed through lexical items, structures, and types of verbs.
This document provides an overview of presupposition. It begins with a definition, stating that presuppositions are implications that are assumed to already be known by the listener. It then discusses six types of presuppositions: existential, factive, lexical, structural, non-factive, and counterfactual. Examples are provided for each type. Common presupposition triggers are also outlined, including definite descriptions, factive predicates, counterfactual conditionals, change of state verbs, temporal clauses, cleft sentences, questions, and others. Entailment is briefly defined as well.
Essay On Child Labour In India. Child labour problems essayMorgan Hampton
Child Labour in India: Causes, Consequences, Laws | UPSC Essay - IAS .... Free Sample Essay on Child Labour in India. (PDF) Child Labour in India: Causes and Consequences. Child Labour Act in India | Essay Preparation For UPSC Exam. Essay About Child Labour In India - thesistemplate.web.fc2.com. Scholarship essay: Child labour in india essay. Child Labour Essay in English for School Students, Kids and Children. Presentation on Child labour in India. Data Story : Child Labour In India - GS SCORE. Essay On Child Labour In India For Students – Read Here – Essay Avenue. literature review of child labour in india. Essay On Child Labour In India – jynuzecys. Child labour problems essay. Essay On Child Labour In India 1500+ Words Pdf. Who Is Child Labour Essay | Sitedoct.org. child labour essays | Child Labour | Labour Economics. Child Labour in India | International Labour Organization | Child Labour. Essay on child labour || Child labour essay in english. Child Labour Essay for School Students in English Essay on Child Labour. The problem of child labour in india essay - internetupdater.web.fc2.com. Essay on Child labour in English for Class 1 to 12 Students. Essay on Child Labour | 900+ Words Paragraph on Child Labour. Child Labour Essay in English for Students. बाल मजदूरी पर निबंध ।। Essay On Child Labour - YouTube. How India has curbed child labour - Rediff.com Business. Essay: Child Labour - Surya Xetri. Causes Of Child Labour Essay In Hindi | Sitedoct.org. Child Labour Essay in English - Indo Moral Tales.
This document discusses logical fallacies and their types. It defines a logical fallacy as a mistake in reasoning. Fallacies are divided into two types: fallacies of relevance, where the premises are irrelevant to the conclusion, and fallacies of insufficient evidence, where the premises do not provide enough evidence to support the conclusion. Several specific fallacies are defined, including personal attacks, attacking the motive, the "two wrongs make a right" fallacy, ambiguity, and discussions of intension vs. extension.
This document provides an overview of pragmatics from a lecture. It defines pragmatics as the study of speaker meaning, contextual meaning, and how more is communicated than what is said. It discusses key concepts in pragmatics including invisible meaning, context, deixis, reference, inference, anaphora, presupposition, speech acts, and politeness. Politeness involves face-saving acts that minimize threats to people's self-image and independence or connection to others. The appropriate interpretation of language depends on context and can differ across cultures.
The document discusses the concept of presupposition in linguistics. It defines presupposition as a background belief that is mutually assumed by the speaker and listener for an utterance to be appropriate. There are several types of presuppositions, including existential, factive, lexical, structural, non-factive, and counterfactual presuppositions. The document provides examples for each type and discusses how presuppositions can project, or not project, when combined in more complex sentences.
This document defines and provides examples of various types of formal and informal fallacies. Formal fallacies are errors in reasoning based on logical form, while informal fallacies occur in everyday discourse. Some fallacies can be unintentional, but others are intentional ways to deceive people. The document then outlines specific fallacies such as fallacies of ambiguity involving unclear meanings, fallacies of relevance using irrelevant premises or conclusions, fallacies of presumption making unjustified assumptions, and fallacies of indefinite induction drawing conclusions from insufficient samples. Examples are provided for each fallacy type.
SEMANTICS AND PRAGMATICS - PRESUPPOSITIONS AND ENTAILMENTSMusfera Nara Vadia
This document discusses the concepts of presupposition and entailment in linguistics. It defines presupposition as something the speaker assumes to be true prior to making an utterance, while entailment is something that logically follows from what is asserted in an utterance. The document provides examples and types of presuppositions including existential, factive, lexical, structural, non-factive, and counter-factual presuppositions. It also discusses entailments and how they differ from presuppositions in depending on sentence meaning rather than context. The document concludes by explaining the projection problem with presuppositions and how foreground and background entailments can indicate intended meaning.
Slang language الدكتور كرار رأفت علوش < Dr. karrar raafat alwashDr. Karrar Alwash
This document discusses slang language and metaphors. It begins by defining slang and explaining how slang evolves based on generational differences and group membership. It then defines metaphors and provides examples of common metaphors. The document discusses different types of metaphors, including implied metaphors, sustained metaphors, dead metaphors, and mixed metaphors. It concludes by outlining the key elements involved in the working mechanism of a metaphor, including the metaphor producer and receiver, the source and target domains, and the role of context.
Pragmatics is the study of contextual meaning and speaker meaning. It examines how context contributes to meaning. Some key concepts in pragmatics include deixis, which examines words like I, you, here, and now that depend on context; presupposition, which are assumptions in language; speech acts, which are actions performed through language like requests or promises; and politeness, which is using language to respect face or self-image. Pragmatics analyzes how people communicate beyond just the words themselves.
1. The document discusses the key concepts of logic including arguments, propositions, premises, conclusions and the validity of arguments.
2. It provides examples to illustrate inductive and deductive arguments, and distinguishes between arguments and explanations.
3. Arguments are considered valid if the truth of the premises necessarily implies the truth of the conclusion, while invalid arguments can have true premises and conclusions but the conclusion does not logically follow.
The document discusses various types and theories of presupposition. It defines presupposition as information that a speaker assumes is already known by listeners. There are different types of presuppositions triggered by lexical items and grammatical constructions, such as existential, factive, and structural presuppositions. Theories view presupposition as either a property of sentences (semantic view) or of speaker beliefs (pragmatic view). Presuppositions are assumed to be part of the common ground between speakers but can be introduced through accommodation.
Understanding arguments, reasoning and hypothesesMaria Rosala
As researchers working in government, influencing service design, we need to know that our research is methodologically sound, our research findings are grounded in empirical data and our recommendations are logically derived.
'Understanding arguments, reasoning and hypotheses' is the first in a series of 5 short courses, covering introduction courses to various aspects of methodology in research, from the use of grounded theory in discovery research, to hypothesis testing and sampling in more experimental research.
In this course, you'll learn:
About arguments
- what we mean by an argument
- how to identify a valid/invalid argument
- what we mean by premises
- what validity and soundness of arguments mean
About reasoning
- what is deductive reasoning and where do we use it
- what is inductive reasoning and where do we use it
- what is abductive reasoning and where do we use it
About hypotheses
- what is a hypotheses and a null hypothesis
- how do we test them
Semantics iv proposition and presuppositionBrian Malone
This document summarizes key concepts about propositions and presuppositions from semantics. It defines propositions as statements that can be evaluated as true or false based on certain truth conditions. Even propositions that are not factually true can still be meaningful if they have identifiable truth conditions. Presuppositions refer to implicit assumptions in utterances about shared background knowledge between speakers. The example given presupposes the reader's familiarity with daily COVID-19 briefings from the White House. Analyzing presuppositions provides insights into implicature and how speakers communicate beyond just the literal meaning of words.
The document discusses presupposition and entailment in linguistics. It defines presupposition as assumptions a speaker holds prior to making an utterance. There are different types of presupposition including existential, factive, lexical, structural, counterfactual, and negative presuppositions. Entailment is defined as logical implications of what is asserted in an utterance, where sentences rather than speakers have entailments. Examples are provided to illustrate presuppositions conveyed by sentences and the difference between presupposition and entailment.
This document discusses key concepts in sentence semantics and propositional logic. It defines sentences, utterances and propositions. A proposition is conceived as an abstract string of words that can be true or false depending on the state of affairs. The document also discusses truth conditions and how knowing the meaning of a sentence involves knowing when it is true or false. It introduces concepts of formal semantics like models and model theory. Finally, it discusses word meaning, propositions, entailment, predicate logic and propositional logic.
This document discusses relative clauses in Vietnamese, including:
- Definitions of relative clauses and how they are used to provide additional information about a noun or pronoun.
- Relative pronouns like who, whom, whose, which, that and relative adverbs like when, where, why.
- Types of relative clauses including restrictive, non-restrictive, and successive clauses.
- Ways relative clauses can be shortened including using participial phrases and infinitive phrases.
- Notes on using relative clauses including when that can be used and cases where the relative pronoun is optional.
Pragmatics is the study of meaning in context and speaker meaning. It examines how context influences meaning. For example, in the conversation about renting an apartment, the full meaning is only understood when considering the context that one person has a dog. Pragmatics also examines presuppositions, speech acts, politeness, and relevance theory. Relevance theory proposes that utterance interpretation focuses on contextually relevant information that produces an effect.
A Visual Guide to 1 Samuel | A Tale of Two HeartsSteve Thomason
These slides walk through the story of 1 Samuel. Samuel is the last judge of Israel. The people reject God and want a king. Saul is anointed as the first king, but he is not a good king. David, the shepherd boy is anointed and Saul is envious of him. David shows honor while Saul continues to self destruct.
Temple of Asclepius in Thrace. Excavation resultsKrassimira Luka
The temple and the sanctuary around were dedicated to Asklepios Zmidrenus. This name has been known since 1875 when an inscription dedicated to him was discovered in Rome. The inscription is dated in 227 AD and was left by soldiers originating from the city of Philippopolis (modern Plovdiv).
How to Download & Install Module From the Odoo App Store in Odoo 17Celine George
Custom modules offer the flexibility to extend Odoo's capabilities, address unique requirements, and optimize workflows to align seamlessly with your organization's processes. By leveraging custom modules, businesses can unlock greater efficiency, productivity, and innovation, empowering them to stay competitive in today's dynamic market landscape. In this tutorial, we'll guide you step by step on how to easily download and install modules from the Odoo App Store.
CapTechTalks Webinar Slides June 2024 Donovan Wright.pptxCapitolTechU
Slides from a Capitol Technology University webinar held June 20, 2024. The webinar featured Dr. Donovan Wright, presenting on the Department of Defense Digital Transformation.
Gender and Mental Health - Counselling and Family Therapy Applications and In...PsychoTech Services
A proprietary approach developed by bringing together the best of learning theories from Psychology, design principles from the world of visualization, and pedagogical methods from over a decade of training experience, that enables you to: Learn better, faster!
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) CurriculumMJDuyan
(𝐓𝐋𝐄 𝟏𝟎𝟎) (𝐋𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝟏)-𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐬
𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐄𝐏𝐏 𝐂𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐮𝐦 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐏𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐩𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬:
- Understand the goals and objectives of the Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) curriculum, recognizing its importance in fostering practical life skills and values among students. Students will also be able to identify the key components and subjects covered, such as agriculture, home economics, industrial arts, and information and communication technology.
𝐄𝐱𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐍𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐒𝐜𝐨𝐩𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐧 𝐄𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐮𝐫:
-Define entrepreneurship, distinguishing it from general business activities by emphasizing its focus on innovation, risk-taking, and value creation. Students will describe the characteristics and traits of successful entrepreneurs, including their roles and responsibilities, and discuss the broader economic and social impacts of entrepreneurial activities on both local and global scales.
How to Setup Default Value for a Field in Odoo 17Celine George
In Odoo, we can set a default value for a field during the creation of a record for a model. We have many methods in odoo for setting a default value to the field.
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
إضغ بين إيديكم من أقوى الملازم التي صممتها
ملزمة تشريح الجهاز الهيكلي (نظري 3)
💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀
تتميز هذهِ الملزمة بعِدة مُميزات :
1- مُترجمة ترجمة تُناسب جميع المستويات
2- تحتوي على 78 رسم توضيحي لكل كلمة موجودة بالملزمة (لكل كلمة !!!!)
#فهم_ماكو_درخ
3- دقة الكتابة والصور عالية جداً جداً جداً
4- هُنالك بعض المعلومات تم توضيحها بشكل تفصيلي جداً (تُعتبر لدى الطالب أو الطالبة بإنها معلومات مُبهمة ومع ذلك تم توضيح هذهِ المعلومات المُبهمة بشكل تفصيلي جداً
5- الملزمة تشرح نفسها ب نفسها بس تكلك تعال اقراني
6- تحتوي الملزمة في اول سلايد على خارطة تتضمن جميع تفرُعات معلومات الجهاز الهيكلي المذكورة في هذهِ الملزمة
واخيراً هذهِ الملزمة حلالٌ عليكم وإتمنى منكم إن تدعولي بالخير والصحة والعافية فقط
كل التوفيق زملائي وزميلاتي ، زميلكم محمد الذهبي 💊💊
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
1. See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340581340
An Analysis of Presupposition Used in Frozen
Conference Paper · April 2020
CITATION
1
READS
369
1 author:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Pragmatics View project
ﮐﺎرآﻣﺪ و ﻣﻮﺛﺮ آﻣﺮﯾﮑﺎﯾﯽ View project
Emad Khalily
pending
32 PUBLICATIONS 10 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Emad Khalily on 11 April 2020.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.
2. An Analysis of Presupposition Used in Frozen
Emad Khalili *
1. MA in General Linguistics, emadkh185@gmail.com
Abstract
Presupposition is one of the topics in semantic study and Pragmatics. In this paper the
researcher is more concerned about the discussion presupposition in pragmatic studies,
where presupposition is in one's mind about everything that exists in the world. In this
paper the researcher used descriptive research method, because all the data comes
from animation and the data is reviewed based on theory of presuppositions.
Presuppositions in Frozen (2013) animation are taken from the conversations of
characters in the animation, and then analyzed by the theory proposed by Yule (1996)
about the type Presuppositions to find out what types are often used in Frozen. Finally,
the researcher has found six types of presupposition which applied in Frozen, they are
23 existential (23%), 18 lexical (18%), 25 structural (25%), 12 factive (12%), 6
nonfactive (6%) and 16 counterfactual (16%). From this paper also, the researcher
expect that this paper can be useful both in learning as an additional science in
learning pragmatics, especially presupposition.
Key words: Presupposition, animation, Frozen, Structural presupposition, Yule
(1996).
1. Introduction
Language is used to transport the messages or information from the speaker to the listener
(Levinson, 1981). In transporting messages or information, people need conversation such
as speaking or using some media such as advertisement, novel, magazine, etc. Fromkin
(1988: 4) states that language is much more than speech; it means language can be used by
people in written language to express messages or information.
In this paper, the writer would like to focus on analysis about presupposition in animation
because of some reason:
First, this topic is needed to be analyzed in order to get a good understanding
between the speaker and the listener to obtain a success communication between
them. The listener should first understand the presupposition from utterances of the
speaker.
3. Second, presupposition or assumption is everything that speaker wants to do before
saying.
Third, Frozen is one of effective and meaningful animations of Illumination
Entertainment.
Finally, the writer hopes this paper will give contribution related to the study of
presupposition.
Frozen is a 2013 American 3D computer-animated musical fantasy film produced by Walt
Disney Animation Studios and released by Walt Disney Pictures. It is the 53rd Disney
animated feature film. Inspired by Hans Christian Andersen's fairy tale "The Snow Queen",
the film tells the story of a fearless princess who sets off on a journey alongside a rugged
iceman, his loyal reindeer, and a naïve snowman to find her estranged sister, whose icy
powers have inadvertently trapped the kingdom in eternal winter.
Yule (1996:133) said that presupposition is something the speaker assumes to be the case
prior to making an utterance; it means that how people can draw the process of thinking in
analysis of some aspects of invisible meaning. In another word, how the listeners can catch
other information alongside with their interpretation. Yule also defines types of
presupposition into six categories: Existential, Factive, Lexical, Structural, counterfactual,
and Non-factive presupposition.
2. Yule (1996) Presupposition model
2-1- Existential presupposition:
It is the assumption of the existence of the entities named by the speaker. For example,
when a speaker says "Simon’s car is new", we can presuppose that Simon exists and that
he has a car, also when someone says “Brett’s dog is cute”, we can presuppose that Brett
exists and he has a dog.
2-2- Factive presupposition
It is the assumption that something is true due to the presence of some verbs such as
"know" and "realize" and of phrases involving glad, for example. Thus, when a speaker
says that he didn’t realize someone was ill, we can presuppose that someone is ill. Also,
when he says "I’m glad it’s over”, we can presuppose that it’s over.
2-3- Lexical presupposition
It is the assumption that the speaker can act as if another meaning (word) will be
understood.
For instance:
Bruce stopped running. (>>He used to run.)
You are late again. (>> You were late before.)
In this case, the use of the expressions "stop" and "again" are taken to presuppose another
concept.
2-4- Structural presupposition
4. It is the assumption associated with the use of certain words and phrases. For example, wh-
question in English are conventionally interpreted with the presupposition that the
information after the wh-form (e.g. when and where) is already known to be the case.
For examples:
When did he travel to the Iceland? (>> he traveled)
Where did you buy the book? (>> you bought the book)
The listener perceives that the information presented is necessarily true rather than just the
presupposition of the person asking the question.
2-5- Non- factive presupposition
It is an assumption that something is not true. For example, verbs like "dream", "imagine"
and "pretend" are used with the presupposition that what follows is not true.
For examples:
I dreamed that I was rich. (>> I am not rich)
We imagined that we were in London. (>> We are not in London)
2-6- Counterfactual presupposition
It is the assumption that what is presupposed is not only untrue, but is the opposite of what
is true, or contrary to facts. For instance, some conditional structures, generally called
counterfactual conditionals, presuppose that the information, in the if- clauses, is not true at
the time of utterance.
For example: If you were my son, I would not allow you to do this. (> you are not my
son)
3. Research Method
The data is collected from Frozen animation. In collecting data, the writer exploits the
technique of non-participant observation. There are some steps in collecting the data. First,
watch the animation in order to find the presupposition from the conversation. Then, mark the
sentence that contains presupposition in Frozen.
The data were analyzed by using model analysis proposed by Yule (1996). After collecting
data, the writer designed the technique of analyzing data as follows: classifying the types of
presupposition and analyzing the meaning of presupposition.
4. Discussions
In this paper, the data were taken from Frozen animation. The data were analyzed by
classifying the presupposition in each type and then the writer found the presupposition that is
intended in the utterances by analyzing the utterances and considering the context that causes
this presupposition. Here, the researcher gave some examples of presupposition used in
animation. Furthermore, the analysis is presented clearly below based on Yule’s theory
(1996).
5. DATUM 1
Grand
Pabbie
Born with the powers or the curse?
>> The power or the curse exists. (Elas’s power)
This situation happens when Grand Pabbie is speaking with the king. From Grand Pabbie’s
utterance it can be analyzed the relationship as in this propositions:
Born with the powers or the curse? (=p)
The power or the curse exists. (=q)
p >> q
It can be seen that the presupposition used in Grand Pabbie’s utterance born with the powers
or the curse? is existential presupposition because we can presuppose that the power or the
curse exists in the animation.
DATUM 2
Olaf You are a lot stronger than I think you realize.
>> You (Marshmallow) are a lot stronger than I (Olaf) think.
This situation happens when Marshmallow holds Anna and Kristoff by the scruff of their
necks in one hand and Olaf in the other. From Olaf’s utterance it can be analyzed the
relationship as in this propositions:
You are a lot stronger than I think you realize. (=p)
You (Marshmallow) are a lot stronger than I think. (=q)
p >> q
It can be seen that the presupposition used in Olaf’s utterance You are a lot stronger than I
think you realize. is factive presupposition because we can presuppose that Marshmallow are
a lot stronger than Olaf thinks.
DATUM 3
Anna
He's just like the one we built as kids.... We were so close.
We can be like that again
>> We were like this (so close) before.
6. This situation happens when Anna kneeled down beside Olaf and is speaking with Elsa. From
Anna’s utterance it can be analyzed the relationship as in this propositions:
He's just like the one we built as kids.... We were so close. We can be like that again. (=p)
We were like this (so close) before. (=q)
p >> q
It can be seen that the presupposition used in Anna’s utterance He's just like the one we built
as kids.... We were so close. We can be like that again. is lexical presupposition because we
can presuppose that they were so close before.
DATUM 4
Boy Why do I have to wear this?
>> I (boy) have to wear this (jacket).
This situation happens when a boy tries to get away as his mother tries to stuff him in a jacket.
From Boy’s utterance it can be analyzed the relationship as in this propositions:
Why do I have to wear this? (=p)
I (boy) have to wear this (jacket). (=q)
p >> q
It can be seen that the presupposition used in Boy’s utterance Why do I have to wear this? is
structural presupposition because we can presuppose the boy has to wear the jacket while he
doesn’t want to do this.
DATUM 5
Anna I was born with it, although I dreamt I was kissed by a troll.
>> I (Anna) wasn’t kissed by a troll.
This situation happens when Anna and Hans are speaking together. From Anna’s utterance it
can be analyzed the relationship as in this propositions:
I was born with it, although I dreamt I was kissed by a troll. (=p)
I (Anna) wasn’t kissed by a troll. (=q)
p >> q
It can be seen that the presupposition used in I was born with it, although I dreamt I was
kissed by a troll. is non- factive presupposition because we can presuppose Anna wasn’t
kissed by a troll.
DATUM 6
7. Anna And I understand if you don't want to help me anymore.
>> You (Kristoff) want to help me (Anna) more.
This situation happens when Anna and Kristoff are speaking. From Anna’s utterance it can be
analyzed the relationship as in this propositions:
And I understand if you don't want to help me anymore. (=p)
You (Kristoff) want to help me (Anna) more. (=q)
p >> q
It can be seen that the presupposition used in Anna’s utterance And I understand if you don't
want to help me anymore. is counter factual presupposition because we can presuppose Anna
wants Kristoff to help her more.
Counterfactual presupposition is an assumption that certain information is opposite the reality
or some conditional structures. Presupposition is what the speaker judge or assume about
everything around this world before saying, to make sense from the listener (Sperber, 2006).
In analysis of presupposition, there are three theorists who had explained about the theory of
types of presupposition:
Gadzar (1979, 124) who classified presupposition into two types, actual and potential
presupposition.
Yule (1996,27) who had been classified types of presupposition into six types such as
existential, lexical, structural, factive, nonfactive and counterfactual.
Hoag (2008) had been separated types of presupposition into two types, simple
presupposition which classified into five forms and complex presupposition which
classified into twenty-six forms.
In this paper, the researcher has analyzed Yule’s theory (1996, 27) because this theorist has
explained about types of presupposition in simpler way than another theorists and it more
understandable with example and clear explanation.
From the explanation in findings, the researcher has found six types of presupposition which
applied in Frozen, they are 23 existential (23%), 18 lexical (18%), 25 structural (25%), 12
factive (12%), 6 nonfactive (6%) and 16 counterfactual (16%). The mostly types of
presupposition found in Frozen animation is Structural.
In the related previous studies based on Yule (1996), Yarahmadi and Olfati (2011) analyzed
Presupposition of Anton Chekhov the Cherry Orchard. Borah (2013) analyzed
presuppositions as a tool for communication. He reviewed Yule (1996) model. Homsa and
Soharti (2016) analyzed presuppositions on a talk show entitled gains through governance
(Insight talk show). They found the most dominant type of presupposition that used was
existential presupposition. Khalili (2017) analyzed Presupposition of Heart of Darkness by
Joseph Conrad. He found all six types of presupposition which applied in the novel Heart of
Darkness and among them, the type of presupposition mostly used were structural and factive.
The type of presupposition mostly used is Structural Presupposition and the less is Non-
8. Factive Presupposition because structural is the assumption that part of a structure contains
information being treated as already known and its mark by WH-questions. In Frozen
animation, most of the conversation and utterances are stated by the form of WH-questions.
The overall data of types of presupposition in the table below:
Table 1: Types of presuppositions used in Frozen
5.Conclusions
Presupposition is a part of subject study in pragmatics which discuss about speaker meaning
based on context to make sense and assertion. As a kind of linguistic study, the study of
presupposition in animation is one of interesting topic to discuss, because this topic able to
make people see the presupposition in different way. Usually, presupposition often found in
communication between two or more persons. And it makes the writer easier to analyze the
presupposition.
From the analysis, the writer has found six types of presupposition which applied in Frozen,
they are 23 existential (23%), 18 lexical (18%), 25 structural (25%), 12 factive (12%), 6
nonfactive (6%) and 16 counterfactual (16%).
As interesting topic, presupposition has many aspects which can be analyzed such as the types
and meaning of presupposition like existential presupposition, factive, lexical, structural,
nonfactive and counterfactual.
This paper can give some knowledge for the readers about presupposition as part of pragmatic
study in linguistic field, such as they can improve their knowledge about concept of language,
communication, context meaning, pragmatics, and presupposition.
References
[1] Borah Hiranya J. Presupposition: A tool for Communication. International Journal of innovative
research and development, Vol. 2, No.7, pp. 62- 64, 2013.
[2] Fromkin V. An introduction to language. Australia, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Limited, 1988.
Frequency
Types of Presupposition
No
23 (23%)
Existential
1
12 (12%)
Factive
2
16 (16%)
Counterfactual
3
18 (18%)
Lexical
4
25 (25%)
Structural
5
6 (6%)
Nonfactive
6
9. [3] Gadzar G. Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition and Logical Form, New York Academic Press,
1979.
[4] Hoag J. Presupposition: NLP Meta Model. San Francisco. Retrieved from http:// www. nlpls. com/
articles/presuppositions.php on February 27, 2008.
[5] Homsa R and Suharti D S. Presuppositions on a talk show entitled gains through governance (an
analysis of presuppositions in insight talk show), Textura – Jurnal Ilmiah, Vol. IV, No. 1, 2016.
[6] Khalili E. An analysis of presupposition used in Heart of Darkness, 2nd International Conference
on Modern Approaches in Humanities, Management, Economics and Accounting, France, Paris, 2017.
[7] Levinson S C. Pragmatics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1983.
[8] Sperber D. Pragmatics in F. Jackson and M. Smith eds., Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of
Language, 2006.
[9] Yarahmadi M and Olfati N. Presupposition analysis of Anton Chekhov the Cherry Orchard,
Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 1(12), 2011.
[10] Yule G. Pragmatics. New York, Oxford University Press, 1996.
Online References
Wikipedia, retrieved from
"https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Frozen_(2013_film)&oldid=819503490
View publication stats
View publication stats