The document discusses the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and how it balances public access to information with privacy rights. It provides an overview of key provisions of FOIA, including that it applies to the executive branch but not Congress or the president. It also outlines several exemptions for releasing information, such as those protecting personal privacy or national security. The document analyzes several court cases that have helped define the scope and limitations of FOIA, including how technology has impacted views on privacy and what constitutes an unwarranted invasion of privacy.
Is open, co-created, hyperlocal democracy really democratic? - a #Notwestmins...Local Democracy Bytes
Lightning Talk by Tim Davies at the We're Not In Westminster Any More event held at The Media Centre in Huddersfield on Saturday 7th February 2015. This event was for everyone who has something positive to say about local democracy and for anyone who is up for a challenge.
ICTs like the internet and mobile phones have become widely used in the Philippines for disseminating and discussing political information. During a 2005 political crisis, recordings of a controversial phone call were shared online after traditional media outlets stopped playing them due to legal threats. This highlighted how ICTs allowed information to spread directly to the public. Since then, both the government and public have increasingly used ICTs to spread their messages, conduct surveillance, and advocate for political issues, bringing new opportunities and challenges around freedom of information and expression.
The document discusses the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and how it balances public access to information with privacy rights. It provides an overview of FOIA, including that it applies to the executive branch but not Congress or the president. There are 7 exemptions including those for national security, personal privacy, and law enforcement purposes. Two Supreme Court cases, Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee and Houchins v. KQED, explored how computers have changed views on privacy and access to public records. The Reporters Committee case found a distinction between scattered records and compiled computerized records that could constitute an unwarranted privacy invasion.
This document discusses the history of government surveillance in the United States and debates the balance between safety and privacy. It outlines several covert surveillance programs implemented since the 1890s, most of which were found to violate the Fourth Amendment's prohibition against unreasonable searches. While surveillance has helped catch some criminals and terrorists, it has also spied on innocent citizens. The document argues we must determine common ground between accountability for surveillance and protecting individual privacy.
Laws & acts relating to the media industryAdam Grundy
- The Human Rights Act of 1998 brought English law into line with the European Convention on Human Rights. It conferred certain privacy rights on individuals, including data protection and online privacy. The Act protects personal data and applies to data held on computers or in relevant filing systems.
- Intellectual property rights protect creative works and include copyright, patents, trademarks, design rights, and protections for confidential information. Copyright specifically protects recorded creative works from unauthorized use and allows authors to take legal action for infringement.
- The Obscene Publications Act 1959 makes it an offense to publish content that could "deprave and corrupt" those who view or access it, including images of extreme or unlawful sexual acts.
The document discusses various laws and court cases related to the regulation of media in the United States, including the First Amendment protections of free speech and the press, prior restraint, defamation laws, copyright, advertising regulations, and the regulation of broadcast media like cable television and radio. It also examines exceptions to free speech like obscenity, privacy laws, and commercial speech standards.
Edited basic newsgathering and publication speech (00006477)[1]internewsarmenia
This document provides an overview of laws related to newsgathering and publication. It discusses the Freedom of Information Act and exemptions to public records requests. Regarding newsgathering, it covers protections for confidential sources, legality of taping conversations, and restrictions on hidden cameras and trespassing. For publication, it outlines laws around invasion of privacy, defamation, and damages. Throughout it provides examples to illustrate key legal concepts and principles.
The document discusses the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and how it balances public access to information with privacy rights. It provides an overview of key provisions of FOIA, including that it applies to the executive branch but not Congress or the president. It also outlines several exemptions for releasing information, such as those protecting personal privacy or national security. The document analyzes several court cases that have helped define the scope and limitations of FOIA, including how technology has impacted views on privacy and what constitutes an unwarranted invasion of privacy.
Is open, co-created, hyperlocal democracy really democratic? - a #Notwestmins...Local Democracy Bytes
Lightning Talk by Tim Davies at the We're Not In Westminster Any More event held at The Media Centre in Huddersfield on Saturday 7th February 2015. This event was for everyone who has something positive to say about local democracy and for anyone who is up for a challenge.
ICTs like the internet and mobile phones have become widely used in the Philippines for disseminating and discussing political information. During a 2005 political crisis, recordings of a controversial phone call were shared online after traditional media outlets stopped playing them due to legal threats. This highlighted how ICTs allowed information to spread directly to the public. Since then, both the government and public have increasingly used ICTs to spread their messages, conduct surveillance, and advocate for political issues, bringing new opportunities and challenges around freedom of information and expression.
The document discusses the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and how it balances public access to information with privacy rights. It provides an overview of FOIA, including that it applies to the executive branch but not Congress or the president. There are 7 exemptions including those for national security, personal privacy, and law enforcement purposes. Two Supreme Court cases, Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee and Houchins v. KQED, explored how computers have changed views on privacy and access to public records. The Reporters Committee case found a distinction between scattered records and compiled computerized records that could constitute an unwarranted privacy invasion.
This document discusses the history of government surveillance in the United States and debates the balance between safety and privacy. It outlines several covert surveillance programs implemented since the 1890s, most of which were found to violate the Fourth Amendment's prohibition against unreasonable searches. While surveillance has helped catch some criminals and terrorists, it has also spied on innocent citizens. The document argues we must determine common ground between accountability for surveillance and protecting individual privacy.
Laws & acts relating to the media industryAdam Grundy
- The Human Rights Act of 1998 brought English law into line with the European Convention on Human Rights. It conferred certain privacy rights on individuals, including data protection and online privacy. The Act protects personal data and applies to data held on computers or in relevant filing systems.
- Intellectual property rights protect creative works and include copyright, patents, trademarks, design rights, and protections for confidential information. Copyright specifically protects recorded creative works from unauthorized use and allows authors to take legal action for infringement.
- The Obscene Publications Act 1959 makes it an offense to publish content that could "deprave and corrupt" those who view or access it, including images of extreme or unlawful sexual acts.
The document discusses various laws and court cases related to the regulation of media in the United States, including the First Amendment protections of free speech and the press, prior restraint, defamation laws, copyright, advertising regulations, and the regulation of broadcast media like cable television and radio. It also examines exceptions to free speech like obscenity, privacy laws, and commercial speech standards.
Edited basic newsgathering and publication speech (00006477)[1]internewsarmenia
This document provides an overview of laws related to newsgathering and publication. It discusses the Freedom of Information Act and exemptions to public records requests. Regarding newsgathering, it covers protections for confidential sources, legality of taping conversations, and restrictions on hidden cameras and trespassing. For publication, it outlines laws around invasion of privacy, defamation, and damages. Throughout it provides examples to illustrate key legal concepts and principles.
Freedom of expression on the internet enables widespread sharing of information but also enables illegal and unethical activities if used improperly. Key issues around freedom of expression online include controlling access to information, especially for children; anonymity which allows anonymous speech but is also used for illegal acts; defamation which restricts untrue statements that harm others; and pornography which some view as protected speech while others see it as harmful if accessible to children. Responsible use of new communication technologies requires consideration of these complex issues around ethics, law, and society.
Legal and Ethical Constraints in the Creative Media Sectoremilyaldredd
The document discusses several UK acts related to media and broadcasting: the Race Relations Act of 1976, which prevented discrimination in employment and services; the Human Rights Act of 1998, which protected various civil liberties; the Licensing Act of 2003, which regulated alcohol sales; and laws around privacy, copyright, libel, obscenity, and broadcasting content. Examples are given for how each law has been applied or challenged in practice.
1) The document discusses government surveillance programs authorized by laws like the Patriot Act and their impact on citizens' privacy and civil liberties. It summarizes several court cases where organizations like the ACLU and EFF have challenged these programs.
2) Key points of contention regarding government surveillance included sections of the Patriot Act allowing access to library and bookstore records (Section 215) and National Security Letters that gag recipients from discussing investigations.
3) Through lawsuits, organizations have forced the government to release previously secret documents interpreting surveillance laws and programs, providing more transparency.
Legal Issues of Government Use of Social MediaDavid Menken
This presentation explores the legal issues relevant to government use of social media, most particularly first amendment and open meetings/document retention matters. It was given at the New York State Cyber Security Conference in Albany NY on June 2, 2015.
All information, data, and material contained, presented, or provided on is for educational purposes only.
Company names mentioned herein are the property of, and may be trademarks of, their respective owners.
The document summarizes the history of US legislation authorizing wiretapping and electronic surveillance. It discusses that wiretapping was originally a felony but was ruled legal by the Supreme Court in 1928. The Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, also known as the Wiretap Act, prohibited unauthorized wiretapping but established procedures for law enforcement to obtain warrants. The Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986 extended these protections to electronic communications. The USA PATRIOT Act, passed after 9/11, expanded the surveillance capabilities of law enforcement and intelligence agencies.
The Patriot Act was passed by Congress and signed into law by President George W. Bush in October 2001 in response to the September 11th terrorist attacks. Its stated purpose was to strengthen national security by expanding the surveillance and investigative powers of law enforcement agencies. Some key provisions included allowing roving wiretaps, searches of business records like library records, and conducting surveillance of individuals suspected of terrorist activities. The act was controversial due to concerns that it weakened civil liberties and increased government intrusion into people's privacy.
The document summarizes several key media laws in the UK, including:
1) The Race Relations Act of 1976 which prevents discrimination based on race in employment, goods/services, education, and public functions and established the Commission for Racial Equality.
2) The Human Rights Act of 1998 which aims to further protect the rights contained in the European Convention on Human Rights in UK law.
3) The Licensing Act of 2003 which establishes a single licensing scheme for premises selling alcohol or providing entertainment and sets out four licensing objectives around public safety, crime prevention, and protecting children.
Shall we learn how to protect out personal data? An introduction to personal ...NikoYanev
The document provides an overview of the history of personal privacy and data protection laws from 1890 to the present. It discusses key events and regulations including the 1890 Harvard Law Review article establishing the "right to be let alone", the 1928 Olmstead vs US Supreme Court case, the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights, the 1967 Katz vs US case, the 1995 European Data Protection Directive, and the 2018 General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The GDPR is the successor to earlier data protection laws and establishes strict rules for handling personal data and penalties for non-compliance.
The document discusses how many essential rights and freedoms guaranteed by the US Constitution have been degraded following the enactment of laws like the USA PATRIOT Act in the name of national security. It summarizes restrictions placed on 1st Amendment rights to freedom of speech and association, as well as the 4th Amendment right against unreasonable searches and seizures, 5th Amendment right to due process, 6th Amendment rights to legal representation and a speedy trial, 8th Amendment freedom from cruel punishment, and 14th Amendment right to equal protection. These expansions of government power have transformed America by eroding fundamental civil liberties.
The Patriot Act was passed in 2001 in response to the 9/11 terrorist attacks. It aimed to strengthen national security by expanding the surveillance and investigative powers of law enforcement. Specifically, it reduced restrictions on searching communications and financial records and broadened the definition of terrorism. While intended to prevent further attacks, the Patriot Act has been criticized for compromising civil liberties and privacy in its application of expanded government powers. Overall, the document discusses the security versus liberty debate in the context of the Patriot Act and its impact on balancing those priorities after 9/11.
The Race Relations Act 1976 was established by the UK Parliament to prevent discrimination based on race, colour, nationality, ethnic or national origin in employment, education, provision of goods and services, and public functions. For example, comments made by Jade Goodie about Shilpa Shetty on Big Brother resulted in Ofcom ruling that Channel 4 had breached the code of conduct.
The Human Rights Act 1998 guarantees various civil and political rights, including the right to privacy, family life, property, free speech, fair trials, thought and religion. For instance, recent phone hacking scandals in the UK have breached privacy rights.
The Licensing Act 2003 regulates the sale and supply of alcohol, provision of entertainment and
The document summarizes issues related to the Australian government's attempt to censor internet content through the Broadcasting Services Amendment (Online Services) Bill 1999. It discusses debates around justifying censorship, whether internet pornography is a major community concern, and the enforceability of the bill. Regarding justification, it finds little empirical evidence that pornography alone causes harm to adults. On community concern, it notes no comprehensive study exists but available evidence suggests pornography is not a pressing issue. It also questions whether existing laws are adequate. The document raises significant doubts about the bill's enforceability given the nature of the internet.
Freedom of Information Act and Open Meetings Reseach PaperNick Sizeland
James Madison believed an informed public was essential to a functioning democracy. In the 1960s, Congressman John Moss championed the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to increase government transparency and public access to information. Moss' bill faced opposition from multiple presidential administrations who saw it as a threat to secrecy. After 12 years of advocacy, Moss' bill was passed in 1966, though President Johnson signed it reluctantly. The Watergate scandal led to amendments strengthening FOIA in 1974, despite a veto from President Ford who felt it endangered national security. FOIA has since been amended further to balance transparency and necessary government confidentiality.
Right to Privacy in the Digital Age-finalGraham Smith
This document summarizes a presentation on the right to privacy in the digital age. It discusses how interference with privacy must be "in accordance with the law" under the European Convention on Human Rights. Specifically, it notes that laws authorizing surveillance must be sufficiently clear and public to allow individuals to know the scope and application of such laws. It also examines legal challenges regarding programs like PRISM and TEMPORA and whether intelligence sharing and bulk surveillance are truly authorized by laws that are sufficiently clear and accessible.
The Broadcasting Act 1990 reformed the structure of British broadcasting by abolishing the Independent Broadcasting Authority and replacing it with the Independent Television Commission and Radio Authority to regulate broadcasting with a "lighter touch". The goal of the Act, which was seen as an example of Thatcherism, was to reform British television which Margaret Thatcher had criticized for its restrictive practices.
The document discusses the right to privacy in the United States, which is not explicitly stated in the Constitution but has been established through case law. It examines the nuances and constraints of the right to privacy as it relates to issues like surveillance, women's reproductive rights, sexuality, and technological advances. The right to privacy is analyzed through significant Supreme Court cases like Griswold v. Connecticut, Katz v. United States, and Roe v. Wade, which helped define and shape the scope of privacy protections in the US.
A CLE presentation at the New York County Lawyer Association by Monique Altheim, Esq. with Joseph Bambara, followed by a panel discussion with Hon. James C. Francis, U.S. Magistrate Judge, Southern District of New York.
The document discusses censorship and freedom of information. It provides background on the Freedom of Information Act which gives Americans the right to access federal agency records. It discusses how the FOIA applies only to federal agencies and not Congress, courts, or state/local governments. It also discusses how FOIA requests have risen over time. The document then discusses how the Supreme Court has ruled on censorship cases regarding the First Amendment. It also discusses censorship in other countries compared to less censorship in the United States.
The document discusses freedom of speech, defining it as the right to express, seek, receive, and impart ideas and information. It traces the history of freedom of speech from the 1500s to modern times, including developments like television, newspapers, and the internet. It also examines some challenges like censorship, hate speech, and the roles and punishment of journalists. The document argues that while freedom of speech is important for democracy and limiting government overreach, there are still debates around current limitations and responsibilities around speech. It suggests globalization, democracy, and civic engagement as ways to help solve issues around freedom of speech.
Freedom of expression on the internet enables widespread sharing of information but also enables illegal and unethical activities if used improperly. Key issues around freedom of expression online include controlling access to information, especially for children; anonymity which allows anonymous speech but is also used for illegal acts; defamation which restricts untrue statements that harm others; and pornography which some view as protected speech while others see it as harmful if accessible to children. Responsible use of new communication technologies requires consideration of these complex issues around ethics, law, and society.
Legal and Ethical Constraints in the Creative Media Sectoremilyaldredd
The document discusses several UK acts related to media and broadcasting: the Race Relations Act of 1976, which prevented discrimination in employment and services; the Human Rights Act of 1998, which protected various civil liberties; the Licensing Act of 2003, which regulated alcohol sales; and laws around privacy, copyright, libel, obscenity, and broadcasting content. Examples are given for how each law has been applied or challenged in practice.
1) The document discusses government surveillance programs authorized by laws like the Patriot Act and their impact on citizens' privacy and civil liberties. It summarizes several court cases where organizations like the ACLU and EFF have challenged these programs.
2) Key points of contention regarding government surveillance included sections of the Patriot Act allowing access to library and bookstore records (Section 215) and National Security Letters that gag recipients from discussing investigations.
3) Through lawsuits, organizations have forced the government to release previously secret documents interpreting surveillance laws and programs, providing more transparency.
Legal Issues of Government Use of Social MediaDavid Menken
This presentation explores the legal issues relevant to government use of social media, most particularly first amendment and open meetings/document retention matters. It was given at the New York State Cyber Security Conference in Albany NY on June 2, 2015.
All information, data, and material contained, presented, or provided on is for educational purposes only.
Company names mentioned herein are the property of, and may be trademarks of, their respective owners.
The document summarizes the history of US legislation authorizing wiretapping and electronic surveillance. It discusses that wiretapping was originally a felony but was ruled legal by the Supreme Court in 1928. The Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, also known as the Wiretap Act, prohibited unauthorized wiretapping but established procedures for law enforcement to obtain warrants. The Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986 extended these protections to electronic communications. The USA PATRIOT Act, passed after 9/11, expanded the surveillance capabilities of law enforcement and intelligence agencies.
The Patriot Act was passed by Congress and signed into law by President George W. Bush in October 2001 in response to the September 11th terrorist attacks. Its stated purpose was to strengthen national security by expanding the surveillance and investigative powers of law enforcement agencies. Some key provisions included allowing roving wiretaps, searches of business records like library records, and conducting surveillance of individuals suspected of terrorist activities. The act was controversial due to concerns that it weakened civil liberties and increased government intrusion into people's privacy.
The document summarizes several key media laws in the UK, including:
1) The Race Relations Act of 1976 which prevents discrimination based on race in employment, goods/services, education, and public functions and established the Commission for Racial Equality.
2) The Human Rights Act of 1998 which aims to further protect the rights contained in the European Convention on Human Rights in UK law.
3) The Licensing Act of 2003 which establishes a single licensing scheme for premises selling alcohol or providing entertainment and sets out four licensing objectives around public safety, crime prevention, and protecting children.
Shall we learn how to protect out personal data? An introduction to personal ...NikoYanev
The document provides an overview of the history of personal privacy and data protection laws from 1890 to the present. It discusses key events and regulations including the 1890 Harvard Law Review article establishing the "right to be let alone", the 1928 Olmstead vs US Supreme Court case, the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights, the 1967 Katz vs US case, the 1995 European Data Protection Directive, and the 2018 General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The GDPR is the successor to earlier data protection laws and establishes strict rules for handling personal data and penalties for non-compliance.
The document discusses how many essential rights and freedoms guaranteed by the US Constitution have been degraded following the enactment of laws like the USA PATRIOT Act in the name of national security. It summarizes restrictions placed on 1st Amendment rights to freedom of speech and association, as well as the 4th Amendment right against unreasonable searches and seizures, 5th Amendment right to due process, 6th Amendment rights to legal representation and a speedy trial, 8th Amendment freedom from cruel punishment, and 14th Amendment right to equal protection. These expansions of government power have transformed America by eroding fundamental civil liberties.
The Patriot Act was passed in 2001 in response to the 9/11 terrorist attacks. It aimed to strengthen national security by expanding the surveillance and investigative powers of law enforcement. Specifically, it reduced restrictions on searching communications and financial records and broadened the definition of terrorism. While intended to prevent further attacks, the Patriot Act has been criticized for compromising civil liberties and privacy in its application of expanded government powers. Overall, the document discusses the security versus liberty debate in the context of the Patriot Act and its impact on balancing those priorities after 9/11.
The Race Relations Act 1976 was established by the UK Parliament to prevent discrimination based on race, colour, nationality, ethnic or national origin in employment, education, provision of goods and services, and public functions. For example, comments made by Jade Goodie about Shilpa Shetty on Big Brother resulted in Ofcom ruling that Channel 4 had breached the code of conduct.
The Human Rights Act 1998 guarantees various civil and political rights, including the right to privacy, family life, property, free speech, fair trials, thought and religion. For instance, recent phone hacking scandals in the UK have breached privacy rights.
The Licensing Act 2003 regulates the sale and supply of alcohol, provision of entertainment and
The document summarizes issues related to the Australian government's attempt to censor internet content through the Broadcasting Services Amendment (Online Services) Bill 1999. It discusses debates around justifying censorship, whether internet pornography is a major community concern, and the enforceability of the bill. Regarding justification, it finds little empirical evidence that pornography alone causes harm to adults. On community concern, it notes no comprehensive study exists but available evidence suggests pornography is not a pressing issue. It also questions whether existing laws are adequate. The document raises significant doubts about the bill's enforceability given the nature of the internet.
Freedom of Information Act and Open Meetings Reseach PaperNick Sizeland
James Madison believed an informed public was essential to a functioning democracy. In the 1960s, Congressman John Moss championed the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to increase government transparency and public access to information. Moss' bill faced opposition from multiple presidential administrations who saw it as a threat to secrecy. After 12 years of advocacy, Moss' bill was passed in 1966, though President Johnson signed it reluctantly. The Watergate scandal led to amendments strengthening FOIA in 1974, despite a veto from President Ford who felt it endangered national security. FOIA has since been amended further to balance transparency and necessary government confidentiality.
Right to Privacy in the Digital Age-finalGraham Smith
This document summarizes a presentation on the right to privacy in the digital age. It discusses how interference with privacy must be "in accordance with the law" under the European Convention on Human Rights. Specifically, it notes that laws authorizing surveillance must be sufficiently clear and public to allow individuals to know the scope and application of such laws. It also examines legal challenges regarding programs like PRISM and TEMPORA and whether intelligence sharing and bulk surveillance are truly authorized by laws that are sufficiently clear and accessible.
The Broadcasting Act 1990 reformed the structure of British broadcasting by abolishing the Independent Broadcasting Authority and replacing it with the Independent Television Commission and Radio Authority to regulate broadcasting with a "lighter touch". The goal of the Act, which was seen as an example of Thatcherism, was to reform British television which Margaret Thatcher had criticized for its restrictive practices.
The document discusses the right to privacy in the United States, which is not explicitly stated in the Constitution but has been established through case law. It examines the nuances and constraints of the right to privacy as it relates to issues like surveillance, women's reproductive rights, sexuality, and technological advances. The right to privacy is analyzed through significant Supreme Court cases like Griswold v. Connecticut, Katz v. United States, and Roe v. Wade, which helped define and shape the scope of privacy protections in the US.
A CLE presentation at the New York County Lawyer Association by Monique Altheim, Esq. with Joseph Bambara, followed by a panel discussion with Hon. James C. Francis, U.S. Magistrate Judge, Southern District of New York.
The document discusses censorship and freedom of information. It provides background on the Freedom of Information Act which gives Americans the right to access federal agency records. It discusses how the FOIA applies only to federal agencies and not Congress, courts, or state/local governments. It also discusses how FOIA requests have risen over time. The document then discusses how the Supreme Court has ruled on censorship cases regarding the First Amendment. It also discusses censorship in other countries compared to less censorship in the United States.
The document discusses freedom of speech, defining it as the right to express, seek, receive, and impart ideas and information. It traces the history of freedom of speech from the 1500s to modern times, including developments like television, newspapers, and the internet. It also examines some challenges like censorship, hate speech, and the roles and punishment of journalists. The document argues that while freedom of speech is important for democracy and limiting government overreach, there are still debates around current limitations and responsibilities around speech. It suggests globalization, democracy, and civic engagement as ways to help solve issues around freedom of speech.
The UK Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) was adopted in 2000 and fully implemented in 2005 across all UK public authorities simultaneously. This led to initial problems with delays in responding to requests and a backlog of complaints. However, civil society played an important role in advocating for the FOIA and ensuring its proper implementation through public awareness campaigns, media involvement, lobbying politicians, and being prepared to support litigation. Lessons learned included capitalizing on political opportunities, cultivating support from key officials, and linking FOI principles to issues that engaged the public.
This document provides an overview of freedom of information laws and their importance. It discusses quotes from founding fathers supporting the public's right to information about the government. Key points include that FOI laws have spread to over 80 countries, aiming to increase transparency and accountability. Exemptions allow withholding of private, confidential commercial or national security information. The document reviews the US Freedom of Information Act and Utah's Government Records Access and Management Act. It provides examples of investigative stories enabled by FOI and challenges in implementing FOI laws.
The document discusses censorship and its history. It explores how censorship was viewed in Ancient Greece and during the Age of Enlightenment. It also examines key Supreme Court cases related to censorship and the First Amendment. The Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act are introduced as giving citizens access to government records. A survey found most people support some censorship, like age restrictions, but not government involvement. Older populations generally support censorship more while younger populations do not.
The UK Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) was adopted in 2000 and fully implemented in 2005 across all UK public authorities simultaneously. This led to initial problems with delays and backlogs in responding to requests. Lessons learned include the need for adequate resources for oversight bodies like the Information Commissioner's Office to promote awareness and compliance. Civil society played an important role through media involvement, advocacy, and litigation to support effective FOIA implementation over time.
Complaint against the UK in re: International Covenant on Civil and Political...Lola Heavey
This document is a communication submitted by Declan Heavey to the United Nations Human Rights Committee alleging violations of his rights under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights by the United Kingdom. He claims he and his wife have been subject to harassment, surveillance and interception of communications by UK intelligence agencies dating back to 2003. He exhausted domestic remedies in the UK, including bringing a case before the Investigatory Powers Tribunal which dismissed it. The communication provides background on Heavey's experiences and outlines his arguments for why the surveillance violated his right to freedom of expression under Article 19 of the ICCPR.
How Does The First Amendment Protect Freedom Of Expression Lesson 30guestcc6c85
The document discusses several key aspects of freedom of expression protections in the US:
1) Early protections for freedom of expression established some limits, including prohibiting speech that presented a "clear and present danger" or constituted libel or slander.
2) A seminal early case, the trial of John Peter Zenger, helped establish freedom of the press by establishing the importance of truth as a defense against libel charges.
3) While the First Amendment protects many forms of expression, the Supreme Court has determined some content-based restrictions and limitations are allowable, such as those relating to obscenity, advertising, and national security issues.
How Does The First Amendment Protect Freedom Of Expression Lesson 30guestcc6c85
The document discusses several key aspects of freedom of expression protections in the US:
1) Early protections for freedom of expression established some limits, including prohibiting speech that presented a "clear and present danger" or constituted libel or slander.
2) A seminal early case, the trial of John Peter Zenger, helped establish freedom of the press by establishing the importance of truth as a defense against libel charges.
3) While the First Amendment protects many forms of expression, the Supreme Court has determined some content-based restrictions are permissible, such as those relating to obscenity, advertising, and national security issues.
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights was developed in 1948 by the United Nations to establish international standards for basic human rights across the world. It outlines 30 fundamental rights that all people should enjoy, such as the rights to life, liberty, equality, and freedom from discrimination and torture. While not legally binding, its principles have been incorporated into the laws of many countries and it serves as a global standard for human rights. However, some nations and groups still violate human rights as outlined in the Declaration.
The Race Relations Act 1976 was introduced by Parliament to prevent discrimination based on race, color, nationality, ethnic or national origin in employment, education, provision of goods and services, and public functions. It updated and strengthened previous anti-discrimination acts due to increasing racism and abuse. The 1976 Act was later repealed by the Equality Act 2010, which consolidated and superseded previous anti-discrimination laws in the UK.
The document discusses the First Amendment and how it protects freedom of speech, press, religion, and assembly. It established separation of church and state. While initially controversial, the Bill of Rights was ratified in 1791. The First Amendment continues to be interpreted over time, especially with new technologies like the Internet. It protects free expression but not things like defamation, inciting violence, or revealing confidential military information.
'The UK Freedom of Information Act – A Practical Guide for Academic Research...Incremental2
The Freedom of Information Act 2000 established a public "right to know" and came into force on January 1, 2005, requiring public bodies to provide information to members of the public when requested, with certain exemptions. The Act covers central government, local authorities, NHS bodies, schools, universities, police, the armed forces, and other public bodies. It established that these bodies must respond to requests for non-personal information within 20 days, and allows individuals to appeal to the Information Commissioner's Office. The document recommends that academic researchers use FOI requests to obtain information unavailable through other means or in advance of standard release rules.
This document summarizes issues regarding freedom of the press in Haiti. It discusses how journalists in Haiti face threats, violence and intimidation from the government as well as economic hardship. Some key incidents described include journalists being harassed, arrested, and in some cases murdered for their work. It also notes that while Haiti's constitution protects freedom of expression, access to information is still limited and journalists have poor working conditions. The document calls on the Haitian government to better protect journalists and support independent media.
This document provides an overview of journalism law in the United States. It discusses how the First Amendment protects press freedoms but is not unlimited, covering issues like censorship, libel, obscenity, and invasion of privacy. It also outlines reporter's privilege and shield laws, as well as freedom of information laws governing access to public records and meetings. The future of these laws as they apply to online journalism is uncertain.
The document discusses the origins and evolution of freedom of speech protections in the United States as outlined in the First Amendment. It describes how early restrictions on speech and press in England and the American colonies influenced calls for protections. Key developments included John Peter Zenger's trial, the writings of John Milton, and Benjamin Franklin's view that little would be printed if everything had to avoid offense. The First Amendment was ultimately ratified in 1791, but its meaning has been shaped over centuries through Supreme Court interpretations of various types of speech and expression.
The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) was enacted in 1966 to provide guidelines for the disclosure of government information, intended to balance the public's right to know with protections for sensitive information. It allows citizens to request non-sensitive federal records but exempts classified, private, and internal government documents. While the FOIA has a high fulfillment rate of requests, some critics argue the government still overclassifies and withholds legitimate information. Recent legislation aimed to increase transparency by creating an ombudsman for disputing FOIA responses.
The Sovereign Independent - June 2011 (4th Edition)Guy Boulianne
This document contains a lengthy article opposing a proposed referendum in Ireland to amend the constitution regarding children's rights. The key points made are:
- The amendment would move children's rights from Article 42 to Article 45, which would make the Oireachtas (government) solely responsible for children's rights and remove the ability for courts to intervene.
- This would mean the state, not parents, would determine what is in children's best interests and satisfy Ireland's obligations to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.
- The UN committee would have power over what the Irish state decides regarding children's issues.
- The state and organizations like the ISPCC have a poor record on child protection
Legal and ethical constraints in the creative media sectorReeceEcR
The document summarizes several UK acts related to discrimination, human rights, alcohol licensing, privacy, copyright, libel, obscenity, and broadcasting. The Race Relations Act of 1976 prohibits discrimination based on race, color, nationality or ethnic origin in employment, education and provision of goods and services. The Human Rights Act of 1998 guarantees rights like freedom of marriage, family and gender equality. The Licensing Act of 2003 requires proof that shops are legally allowed to sell alcohol. The Privacy, Copyright, Libel, Obscene Publications and Broadcasting Acts also establish important laws around these issues.
How to Fix the Import Error in the Odoo 17Celine George
An import error occurs when a program fails to import a module or library, disrupting its execution. In languages like Python, this issue arises when the specified module cannot be found or accessed, hindering the program's functionality. Resolving import errors is crucial for maintaining smooth software operation and uninterrupted development processes.
This presentation includes basic of PCOS their pathology and treatment and also Ayurveda correlation of PCOS and Ayurvedic line of treatment mentioned in classics.
A workshop hosted by the South African Journal of Science aimed at postgraduate students and early career researchers with little or no experience in writing and publishing journal articles.
5. What is the Freedom of Information Act ? How it’s used by Journalists Case studies For and Against the FOI Act How Britain’s FOI Act compares to the World
6. Freedom of Information It came fully into effect in the UK in 2005 Enables us to request information about more than 100, 000 public authorities More than 50 countries have FoI legislation
7. Freedom of Information The first FoI law was passed in Sweden. The ruling party used it to access documents the previous government had kept secret
9. “ In circumstances when disclosure might be politically or administratively inconvenient, the balance struck by the government comes down, time and time again, against full disclosure.” The Right Honourable Richard Scott 1996
13. An Open Book? It’s free to make a request Anyone can make a request, not just UK Citizens You can e-mail or fax requests New culture of openness?