BUFFALO, N.Y. - U.S. Attorney James P. Kennedy, Jr. announced today that a federal grand jury has returned a 23-count indictment charging four defendants with conspiracy to distribute one kilogram or more of heroin and 400 grams or more of fentanyl. Charged in the conspiracy are:
• Robert Moore, a/k/a Fonz, a/k/a Charmy, 39 of Williamsville, NY;
• Reese Moore, a/k/a Detroit, 25 of Buffalo; NY
• Kevin Abernathy, a/k/a B, 31 also of Buffalo; and
• Joshua Levine, 21 of Lancaster, NY.
Indictment of Guy Philippe - Akizasyon Gouvènman Ameriken Kont Senatè Elu Guy...Stanleylucas
Lapolis Ayiti arete yon Senatè elu Ayisien Guy Philippe sou lod otorite Potoprens yo. Apre sa otorite Potoprens yo remèt Guy Philippe bay Gouvènman ameriken. Dokiman sa se akizasyon ke gouvènman ameriken prezante nan tribinal Florida kont senatè elu Guy Philippe.
Indictment of Guy Philippe - Akizasyon Gouvènman Ameriken Kont Senatè Elu Guy...Stanleylucas
Lapolis Ayiti arete yon Senatè elu Ayisien Guy Philippe sou lod otorite Potoprens yo. Apre sa otorite Potoprens yo remèt Guy Philippe bay Gouvènman ameriken. Dokiman sa se akizasyon ke gouvènman ameriken prezante nan tribinal Florida kont senatè elu Guy Philippe.
United States vs. Herbert Guest (Highlighted)VogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
United States vs. Herbert Guest is a decision rendered by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1966. It addresses issues regarding the “RIGHTS” to Travel of Negroes – i.e. Natives, Native Americans and those LABELED by the White Man as being Blacks/Negroes/African-Americans/People-of-Color.
WHY is this case so important? (1) Because it provides EVIDENCE of the Court’s DIVERSITY;
(2) EVIDENCE of the United States Congress placing a KU KLUX KLAN Member on the Bench;
(3) It will support EVIDENCE of the TRANSITION and the CHANGING of the DYNAMIC of the Court(s) through UNLAWFUL “STACKING” practices wherein to date (11/18/18) comprises ONLY of JEWS and CATHOLICS - - NOT only that, the CONTROL and RUNNING of the United States of America’s Government by NAZIS and/or WHITE Jews/Zionists/Supremacists in their QUEST for PROMOTING “White Supremacy” and push to MAKE “JUDAISM” and “KU KLUX KLAN” the SUPERIOR Faith/Religion/Beliefs, etc. to CONTROL the WORLD. . .!
Verified Criminal Complaint to US Middle District, Orlando Division Grand JurySandra Karwel
On November 8, 2016 Steve Shytle of Palm Bay Police did a criminal Home Invasion of my home of 48 years, and this is a federal crime. This is a complaint to the US Attorney Victim's Coordinator. Leadership is standing-up against violence, and justice is worth life, so I have launched a Global Campaign to get my Home back, and have a US Federal Grand Jury Indictment against Steve Shytle and Robert Lemke.
This is the final judgment of Oriel Jean Oriel Jean — the former security chief of ex-President Jean-Bertrand Aristide and whose testimony in U.S. courts a decade ago helped take down key figures in Haiti’s drug trafficking underworld
In 2005, Jean was sentenced to three years in prison in a money-laundering plea deal after helping the U.S. Attorney’s Office convict several Haitians and Colombians of moving tons of Colombian cocaine through Haiti to the United States.
At Jean’s November 2005 sentencing, U.S. District Judge Jose Martinez complimented him for his “good work.” In his court testimony, Jean indirectly implicated former Haitian President Jean Bertrand Aristide and also testified against him before the grand jury.
TERESA LOPEZ, individually and as heir
to ANTONIO RAMOS, deceased;
RED RYDER RAMOS, individually and as
heir to ANTONIO RAMOS, deceased; and
TERESA LOPEZ and RED RYDER
RAMOS, as co-representatives of the
ESTATE OF ANTONIO RAMOS,
Plaintiffs,
v.
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, a
governmental entity,
COUNT 4 - CONSPIRACY TO MURDER (For UIE...Criminal Complaint)VogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
CONFEDERATE STATES OF AMERICA’S A/K/A UNITED STATES OF AMERICA’S CONFEDERATES, KU KLUX KLAN, WHITE SUPREMACISTS/ZIONISTS CONSPIRE TO HAVE THE UTICA INTERNATIONAL EMBASSY’S INTERIM PRIME MINISTER VOGEL DENISE NEWSOME ASSASSINATED AND/OR MURDERED
Brayshaw v. Annette Garrett, Unconstitutional Internet Posting RemovalsTerry81
Brayshaw V. Annette Garrett, Federal Lawsuit Against Her Unconstitutional Internet Posting Removals on the internet against the First Amendment and Constitutional Rights of Rob Brayshaw. Brayshaw has a Federal Court order against this crooked and dirty cop in which he has the right to criticize and publish her public and personal information regarding her various fraud and corruption working as a dirty police officer.
Rob Brayshaw Fights With Dream Defenders v._DesantisTerry81
Rob Brayshaw is case cited in the fight with the Dream Defenders and The ACLU against Governor Ron Desantis for the Unconstitutional and illegal HB1 Bill against blacks and minorities for free speech and free press protected for legal and peaceful protests.
United States vs. Herbert Guest (Highlighted)VogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
United States vs. Herbert Guest is a decision rendered by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1966. It addresses issues regarding the “RIGHTS” to Travel of Negroes – i.e. Natives, Native Americans and those LABELED by the White Man as being Blacks/Negroes/African-Americans/People-of-Color.
WHY is this case so important? (1) Because it provides EVIDENCE of the Court’s DIVERSITY;
(2) EVIDENCE of the United States Congress placing a KU KLUX KLAN Member on the Bench;
(3) It will support EVIDENCE of the TRANSITION and the CHANGING of the DYNAMIC of the Court(s) through UNLAWFUL “STACKING” practices wherein to date (11/18/18) comprises ONLY of JEWS and CATHOLICS - - NOT only that, the CONTROL and RUNNING of the United States of America’s Government by NAZIS and/or WHITE Jews/Zionists/Supremacists in their QUEST for PROMOTING “White Supremacy” and push to MAKE “JUDAISM” and “KU KLUX KLAN” the SUPERIOR Faith/Religion/Beliefs, etc. to CONTROL the WORLD. . .!
Verified Criminal Complaint to US Middle District, Orlando Division Grand JurySandra Karwel
On November 8, 2016 Steve Shytle of Palm Bay Police did a criminal Home Invasion of my home of 48 years, and this is a federal crime. This is a complaint to the US Attorney Victim's Coordinator. Leadership is standing-up against violence, and justice is worth life, so I have launched a Global Campaign to get my Home back, and have a US Federal Grand Jury Indictment against Steve Shytle and Robert Lemke.
This is the final judgment of Oriel Jean Oriel Jean — the former security chief of ex-President Jean-Bertrand Aristide and whose testimony in U.S. courts a decade ago helped take down key figures in Haiti’s drug trafficking underworld
In 2005, Jean was sentenced to three years in prison in a money-laundering plea deal after helping the U.S. Attorney’s Office convict several Haitians and Colombians of moving tons of Colombian cocaine through Haiti to the United States.
At Jean’s November 2005 sentencing, U.S. District Judge Jose Martinez complimented him for his “good work.” In his court testimony, Jean indirectly implicated former Haitian President Jean Bertrand Aristide and also testified against him before the grand jury.
TERESA LOPEZ, individually and as heir
to ANTONIO RAMOS, deceased;
RED RYDER RAMOS, individually and as
heir to ANTONIO RAMOS, deceased; and
TERESA LOPEZ and RED RYDER
RAMOS, as co-representatives of the
ESTATE OF ANTONIO RAMOS,
Plaintiffs,
v.
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, a
governmental entity,
COUNT 4 - CONSPIRACY TO MURDER (For UIE...Criminal Complaint)VogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
CONFEDERATE STATES OF AMERICA’S A/K/A UNITED STATES OF AMERICA’S CONFEDERATES, KU KLUX KLAN, WHITE SUPREMACISTS/ZIONISTS CONSPIRE TO HAVE THE UTICA INTERNATIONAL EMBASSY’S INTERIM PRIME MINISTER VOGEL DENISE NEWSOME ASSASSINATED AND/OR MURDERED
Brayshaw v. Annette Garrett, Unconstitutional Internet Posting RemovalsTerry81
Brayshaw V. Annette Garrett, Federal Lawsuit Against Her Unconstitutional Internet Posting Removals on the internet against the First Amendment and Constitutional Rights of Rob Brayshaw. Brayshaw has a Federal Court order against this crooked and dirty cop in which he has the right to criticize and publish her public and personal information regarding her various fraud and corruption working as a dirty police officer.
Rob Brayshaw Fights With Dream Defenders v._DesantisTerry81
Rob Brayshaw is case cited in the fight with the Dream Defenders and The ACLU against Governor Ron Desantis for the Unconstitutional and illegal HB1 Bill against blacks and minorities for free speech and free press protected for legal and peaceful protests.
A search warrant filed in U.S. District Court, obtained by 7 Eyewitness News, reveals while in the Niagara County jail – James Stivers requested to quote “make a phone call to his sister in order to have her throw out his computer so that he could beat his case.”
An Overview of Procedural Rights in White Collar Criminal ProsecutionsJeffrey Ahonen
This presentation is targeted primarily to paralegals, legal assistants, and legal secretaries, and provides an overview of a defendant's federal constitutional rights in a white collar criminal prosecution. It was created for a webinar conducted on February 10, 2011, under the sponsorship of the American Alliance of Paralegals, Inc., a nonprofit organization for professional paralegals.
PRIMA FACIE CASE UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAWSVogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
. . . the first international conception of conspiracy law, requiring a finding that of 1) a plan involving at least two persons 2) a clearly outlined
criminal purpose and 3) that the plan cannot be too far removed from the time of decision and
action.
A separate “conspiracy”-like form of participation (in successful endeavors) was also defined by the tribunal where 1) there was an existing system to commit the offences, 2) awareness of the system by the accused and 3) that the accused be involved in the operation of the system.
05/09/18 Cary Cornelius Johnson's Complaint Filed With The Office Of The Att...VogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
The following is the Complaint Mr. Cary Cornelius Johnson went to file with the Office Of The Attorney General State Of Mississippi on today, May 9, 2018, wherein his efforts were OBSTRUCTED by Mr. Perry Tate, Sr. who from his online Profile is a Senior Criminal Investigator at the MS Office Of Attorney General.
We see, that it appears, Mr. Perry may be a Jackson State University Alumni - UMMMM!
Amend Complaint Docket No. 1:2011-CV-00240 Louis Charles Hamilton II vs. United States Attorney Office et al, CVS/Caremark and (UPS) United Parcel Services.
10/05/18 NOTICE OF NONATTENDANCE 100818 COURT MATTER (Cary Johnson)VogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - IN THE MUNICIPAL COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI: CASE NO. GP10042161 - Notice of Non-Attendance at October 8, 2018 Court Action - Response Demanded By Friday, October 19, 2018; Notification That Mississippi Department Of Public Safety Contacted On 10/01/18 and Demand Issued For Response By 10/16/18 Regarding Matter(s) Relevant To This Court Action; and Notice of Process Begun Seeking International Judicial Prosecution Through The Applicable International Tribunals – INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT Reference OTP-CR-367/18
LET US BE VERY CLEAR, the Utica International Embassy’s Officials WILL proceed with Criminal Acts against the INDIVIDUALS identified and/or to be named/identified! On 10/08/18, while the Washington County, Mississippi Court and its TAINTED/CORRUPT Officials will be PREYING on the IGNORANCE and ILLITERACY of their Victims of the Laws, their CRIMINAL Acts (i.e. USURPING Jurisdiction in matters KNOWN to its Officials are LACKING, ABUSE OF POWERS, etc.) are a matter of PUBLIC RECORD and will be USED to support the THREATS on the Lives, Liberties, Freedoms of SOVEREIGN Citizens by the United States of America’s/State of Mississippi’s TERRORISTS and Members within such TERRORIST Cells (as the Greenville, Mississippi Police Department)!
WITH WARMEST REGARDS,
Utica International Embassy,
c/o Interim Prime Minister Vogel Denise Newsome
Website: https://uticainternationalembassy.website
Slideshare: www.Slideshare.net/VogelDenise
TWO WOMEN WHO WORK AT THE COLLEGE ARE SUING IT.
THEY'RE ACCUSING *MARK MISTRINER,* A FORMER ADMINISTRATOR, OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT... INCLUDING UNWANTED TOUCHING.
THEY CLAIM TOP BRASS KNEW, AND DID NOTHING.
AND FURTHER, THEY ALLEGE THEY WERE RETALIATED AGAINST WITH AN UNDESIRABLE JOB REASSIGNMENT.
THE WOMEN WANT THEIR OLD JOBS BACK PLUS COMPENSATION.
Bruso letter to ECDOH on restaurant inspections matterAdam Francis
Erie County Legislator John Bruso, Chair of the Legislature’s Health and Human Services Committee, submitted a letter to Dr. Gale Burstein, formally requesting her testimony on the matter of forged inspection reports for local restaurants.
ATTORNEY GENERAL’S SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS AND PROSECUTIONS UNIT RELEASES REPO...Adam Francis
Today, New York Attorney General Barbara D. Underwood’s Special Investigations and Prosecutions Unit (SIPU) released a comprehensive report on its investigation into the March 2018 death of Susan LoTempio in the City of Buffalo.
The Government Justice Center (GJC), a non-partisan legal center founded last year to protect taxpayers from improper government action, has filed a lawsuit in state Supreme Court in Albany to block unconstitutional actions by the state Committee on Legislative and Executive Compensation.
Former CCS president charged in connection with six patient deathsAdam Francis
Dr. W. Sam Yi, CCS Oncology's former president and chief medical officer, is facing administrative charges in the death of six patients and one other. The charges were filed by the New York State Health Department.
Tonawanda Coke cease and desist permit revocation 7.20.2018Adam Francis
Statement from Basil Seggos, Commissioner of the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation
“In response to repeated violations and ongoing concerns about air pollution, I have demanded that Tonawanda Coke Corporation immediately cease and desist all operations associated with violations at this facility to prevent potential harm to its workers, surrounding community, and the environment and have commenced revocation of the facility’s air permits. In addition, I have directed DEC staff to deploy additional air monitoring equipment to ensure the surrounding community is not being impacted from their egregious violations.”
Introducing New Government Regulation on Toll Road.pdfAHRP Law Firm
For nearly two decades, Government Regulation Number 15 of 2005 on Toll Roads ("GR No. 15/2005") has served as the cornerstone of toll road legislation. However, with the emergence of various new developments and legal requirements, the Government has enacted Government Regulation Number 23 of 2024 on Toll Roads to replace GR No. 15/2005. This new regulation introduces several provisions impacting toll business entities and toll road users. Find out more out insights about this topic in our Legal Brief publication.
ASHWINI KUMAR UPADHYAY v/s Union of India.pptxshweeta209
transfer of the P.I.L filed by lawyer Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay in Delhi High Court to Supreme Court.
on the issue of UNIFORM MARRIAGE AGE of men and women.
How to Obtain Permanent Residency in the NetherlandsBridgeWest.eu
You can rely on our assistance if you are ready to apply for permanent residency. Find out more at: https://immigration-netherlands.com/obtain-a-permanent-residence-permit-in-the-netherlands/.
RIGHTS OF VICTIM EDITED PRESENTATION(SAIF JAVED).pptxOmGod1
Victims of crime have a range of rights designed to ensure their protection, support, and participation in the justice system. These rights include the right to be treated with dignity and respect, the right to be informed about the progress of their case, and the right to be heard during legal proceedings. Victims are entitled to protection from intimidation and harm, access to support services such as counseling and medical care, and the right to restitution from the offender. Additionally, many jurisdictions provide victims with the right to participate in parole hearings and the right to privacy to protect their personal information from public disclosure. These rights aim to acknowledge the impact of crime on victims and to provide them with the necessary resources and involvement in the judicial process.
NATURE, ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL LAW.pptxanvithaav
These slides helps the student of international law to understand what is the nature of international law? and how international law was originated and developed?.
The slides was well structured along with the highlighted points for better understanding .
ALL EYES ON RAFAH BUT WHY Explain more.pdf46adnanshahzad
All eyes on Rafah: But why?. The Rafah border crossing, a crucial point between Egypt and the Gaza Strip, often finds itself at the center of global attention. As we explore the significance of Rafah, we’ll uncover why all eyes are on Rafah and the complexities surrounding this pivotal region.
INTRODUCTION
What makes Rafah so significant that it captures global attention? The phrase ‘All eyes are on Rafah’ resonates not just with those in the region but with people worldwide who recognize its strategic, humanitarian, and political importance. In this guide, we will delve into the factors that make Rafah a focal point for international interest, examining its historical context, humanitarian challenges, and political dimensions.
Military Commissions details LtCol Thomas Jasper as Detailed Defense CounselThomas (Tom) Jasper
Military Commissions Trial Judiciary, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Notice of the Chief Defense Counsel's detailing of LtCol Thomas F. Jasper, Jr. USMC, as Detailed Defense Counsel for Abd Al Hadi Al-Iraqi on 6 August 2014 in the case of United States v. Hadi al Iraqi (10026)
Car Accident Injury Do I Have a Case....Knowyourright
Every year, thousands of Minnesotans are injured in car accidents. These injuries can be severe – even life-changing. Under Minnesota law, you can pursue compensation through a personal injury lawsuit.
WINDING UP of COMPANY, Modes of DissolutionKHURRAMWALI
Winding up, also known as liquidation, refers to the legal and financial process of dissolving a company. It involves ceasing operations, selling assets, settling debts, and ultimately removing the company from the official business registry.
Here's a breakdown of the key aspects of winding up:
Reasons for Winding Up:
Insolvency: This is the most common reason, where the company cannot pay its debts. Creditors may initiate a compulsory winding up to recover their dues.
Voluntary Closure: The owners may decide to close the company due to reasons like reaching business goals, facing losses, or merging with another company.
Deadlock: If shareholders or directors cannot agree on how to run the company, a court may order a winding up.
Types of Winding Up:
Voluntary Winding Up: This is initiated by the company's shareholders through a resolution passed by a majority vote. There are two main types:
Members' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is solvent (has enough assets to pay off its debts) and shareholders will receive any remaining assets after debts are settled.
Creditors' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is insolvent and creditors will be prioritized in receiving payment from the sale of assets.
Compulsory Winding Up: This is initiated by a court order, typically at the request of creditors, government agencies, or even by the company itself if it's insolvent.
Process of Winding Up:
Appointment of Liquidator: A qualified professional is appointed to oversee the winding-up process. They are responsible for selling assets, paying off debts, and distributing any remaining funds.
Cease Trading: The company stops its regular business operations.
Notification of Creditors: Creditors are informed about the winding up and invited to submit their claims.
Sale of Assets: The company's assets are sold to generate cash to pay off creditors.
Payment of Debts: Creditors are paid according to a set order of priority, with secured creditors receiving payment before unsecured creditors.
Distribution to Shareholders: If there are any remaining funds after all debts are settled, they are distributed to shareholders according to their ownership stake.
Dissolution: Once all claims are settled and distributions made, the company is officially dissolved and removed from the business register.
Impact of Winding Up:
Employees: Employees will likely lose their jobs during the winding-up process.
Creditors: Creditors may not recover their debts in full, especially if the company is insolvent.
Shareholders: Shareholders may not receive any payout if the company's debts exceed its assets.
Winding up is a complex legal and financial process that can have significant consequences for all parties involved. It's important to seek professional legal and financial advice when considering winding up a company.
FIVE DEFENDANTS INDICTED FOR SELLING HEROIN AND FENTANYL THAT LED TO THE DEATHS OF SIX INDIVIDUALS
1. OLIVERKIMMONS
a/t/aOlTiea/k/aAJ.i
rN rm DrsrRlcr co(1Rr oF rm uvlzqR#mHil
APR I 2 2018
for the Westem Distict of New Yotk
OCTOBER2Ol5GRAND JURY
(Impaneled lO / 28 / 2016)
Violations:
Title 21, United States Code,
Sections 841(aXl), 846 atd 856(aXl);
Title 18, United States Code,
Sections 1591(a) and 159lOXl)
(14 Counts and Forfeiture Allegation)
couNT I
(Conspiracy to Distdbute Heroin anil Fentanyl)
The Grand Jury Charges That:
Beginning in or before June 2013 and continuing to in or about April 2016, the exact
dates being unknown, in the western District of New York, and elsewhere, the defendant,
oLMR KIMMONS alkla olhe alwa AJi, did knowingly, willfully and unlawfi.tlly
combine, conspire and agree with others, known and unknown, to commit the following
offenses, that is, to possess with intent to distribute, and to distribute, a quantity ofheroin, a
Schedule I controlled substance, and a quantity offentanyl, a Schedule II controlled substance
in violation of Title 21, United States Code, Section 841(a)(1).
AII in violation of Title 21, United States Code, Section &46.
SECOND
TIIE TINTIED STATES OF AMERICA SIJPERSEDING INDICTMENT
lGCR-63-V
-ts-
2. COUNT2
@ossession of Eeroin and Fentanyl with Ilteat to Distribute)
The Grand Jury Further Charges That:
Beginning in or before June 2013 and continuing to in or about Aprn 20ft, the exact
dates being untnown, in the Western District of New York, the defendant, OLfVER
KIMMONS a/Wa Ollie alk/a AJi, did knowingly, intentionally and unlawfully possess
with intent to distribute a quantity ofheroin, a Schedule I controlled zubstance, and a quantity
of fentanyl, a Schedule II controlled substance.
AII in violation ofTitle 21, United States Code, Sectioa 8af(a[f).
COL]NT3
(Distribution of Fentanyl Causing Death)
The Grand Jury Further Charges That:
On or about January 30, 2015, in the Westem District of New York, the defendant,
OLIVER KIMMONS a/WaOllie alk/a AJi, did knowingly, intentionally, and unlawfully
possess with the inteat to distribute, and distribute, a quantiry of fentanyl, a Schedule II
controlled substance, and the death of H.C., a person tnown to the Grand Jury, resulted from
the use of such substance.
AII in viotation of Title 21, Uaited States Code, Secrions 841(a)(l) and S4lOXf XC),
and Title 18, United States Code, Section 2.
2
3. COUIII4
@ossession of Fentanyl with Intent to Distribute)
The Grand Jury Further Charges That:
On or about March 10, 2015, in the Westem District of New York, the defendant,
OLIYER KIMMONS a/k/a Ollie a/k/a AJi, did knowingly, intentionally and unlawfully
possess with intent to distribute a quantity of fentanyl, a Schedule II controlled substance.
AII in violation ofTitle 21, United States Code, Section 8a1(a[f).
COUNT5
@ossession of Eeroin with Intent to Distribute)
The Grand Jury Further Charges That:
On or about March 10, 2015, in the Westem District of New York, the defendant,
OLMR KIMMONS a/k/a Ollie a/k/a Ali, did knowingly, intentionally and unlawfully
possess with intent to distribute a quantity of heroin, a Schedule I controlled substance.
AII in violation of Title 21, Urited States Code, Section Ml(aXf).
couNT6
@ossessioa of Cocaine with Intert to Distribute)
The Grantl Jury Further Charges That:
On or about March 10, 2015, in the Westem District of New York, the defendant,
OLMRKIMMONS a/k/a Ollie alUa Ali, did knowingly, intentionally and unlawfully
possess with intent to distribute a quantity ofcocaine, a Schedule [I controlled substance.
AII in violation ofTitle 21, United States Code, Section 841(a)(1).
3
4. COI,JNTT
(Maintaining a Drug-Involved Premises)
The Grand Jury Further Charges That:
From in or about February 2015 and continuing to in or about April 2016, t}re exact
dates being unknown, in the Westem District of New York, the defendant, OLMR
KIMMONS alUa Ollie a/k/a AJi, did knowingly, intentionally and unlawfully use and
maintain a place, that is, the premises at 587 Evergreen, Lockport, New York, for the purpose
of manufactr.rring, distributing and using fentanyl and cocaine, both Schedule II controlled
substances, and heroin and marijuana, both Schedule I controlled substances.
AII in violation ofTitle 21, United States Code, Section 856(aXl).
COUNTS
@ossessiol with Int€nt to Distribute, and Distritution of, Fentaayl)
The Grand fury Further Charges That:
On or about February 5,2016, in the Westem District of New Yor the defendant,
OLMR KIMMONS a/k/a Ollie a/kla AJ| did knowingly, intentionally and unlawfully
possess with intent to distribute, and distribute, a quantity offentanyl, a Schedule II controlled
substance.
All in violation of Title 21, Uaited States Code, Section 841(a[1).
4
5. CO 9
(Maiataining a Drug-Involved Premises)
The Grand Jury Further Charges That:
From in or about January 2016, the exact date being unknown, and continuing to on
or about February 5, 2016, in the Westem District of New York, the defendant, OLMR
KIMMONS a/k/a Ollie, a/Wt AJi, did knowingly, intentionally and unlawfully use and
maintain a place, that is, the premises at 6559 Lincoln Place, Lockport, New York, for the
purpose of manufacnrring, distributing and using heroin and marijuana, Schedule I controlled
substances.
AII in violation ofTitle2l, United States Code, Section 856(a)(l).
COUNT IO
(Sex Trafficting by Force, Fraud or Coercion)
The Grand Jury Further Charges That:
From in or about November 2015 and continuing through in or about April 2016, the
exact dates being unknown, in the Westem District of New York, and elsewhere, the
defendant, OLMR KIMMONS a/k/a OlTie alAa AJi, did knowingly, in and affecting
interstate commerce, recnrit, entice, harbor, transport, provide, obtain, advertise, maintain,
patrorize, and solicit by any means, Victim l, a person known to the Grand Jury, and did
benefit financially and by receiving anything of value from participation in a venture which
has engaged in such acts, knowing and, except where the act constituting the violation is
advertising, in reckless disregard of the fact that means of force, Ihreats of force, fraud,
5
6. coercion, and a combination of such means, would be used to cause Victim 1 to engage in a
commercial sex act.
All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1591(a) and 1591OXl),
COI'NT 1I
(Sex Trafrcling by Force, Fraud or Coercioa)
The Grand Jury Further Charges That:
From in or about June 2013 and continuing through in or about April 2016, the exact
dates being unknown, in the Western District of New York, and elsewhere, the defendant,
OLfVER KIMMONS a/kla Ollie a/k/a AJi, did kaowingly, in and affecting intersrate
commerce, recruit, entice, harbor, transport, provide, obtain, advertise, maintain, pauonize,
and solicit by any means, Victim 2, a person known to the Grand Jury, and did benefit
financially and by receiving anything of value from participatioa in a venture which has
eagaged in such acts, knowing and, except where the act constituting the violation is
advenising, in reckless disregard of the fact that means of force, threas of force, fraud,
coercion, and a combination of such means, would be used to cause Victim 2 to engage in a
commercial sex act.
AII in violation ofTitle 18, United States Code, Sections l59l(a) and f59f@Xf).
6
7. COUNT12
(Sex Trafficking b5r Force, Fraud or Coercion)
The Grand Jury Further Charges That:
From in or about June 2013 and continuing through in or about April 2016, the exact
dates being unknown, in the Westem District of New York, and elsewhere, the defendant,
OLMR KIMMONS a/k/a Ollie alk/a Ni, did knowingly, in and affecting interstate
commerce, recruit, entice, harbor, transport, provide, obtain, advertise, maintain, patoruze,
and solicit by any means, Victim 3, a person known to the Grand Jury, and did benefit
financially and by receiving anything of value from participation in a venture which has
engaged in such acts, knowing and, except where the act consdturing the violation is
advertising, in reclless disregard of the fact that means of force, threats of force, fraud,
coercion, and a combination of such means, would be used to cause Victim 3 to engage in a
commercial sex act.
AII in violation ofTitle 18, Uniteal States Code, Sections f59f(a) and 159f@)(f).
C l3
(Sex Trafficlrrng by Force, Fraud or Coercion)
The Grand Jury Further Charges That:
From in or about 2013 and continuing through in or about April 2016, the exact dates
being unknown, in the Westem District of New York, and elsewhere, the defendant,
OLIYER KIMMONS alWa Ollie a/k/a AJi, did knowingly, in and affecting interstate
coflrmerce, recruit, entice, harbor, transport, provide, obtain, advertise, maintain, pafroarze,
and solicit by any means, Victim 4, a person known to the Grand Jury, and did benefit
7
8. financially and by receiving anything of value from participation in a venture which has
engaged in such acts, knowing and, except where the act constituting the violation is
advertising, in reckless disregard of the fact that means of force, threats of force, fraud,
coercion, and a combination of such means, would be used to cause Victim 4 to engage in a
commercial sex act.
Atl in violation ofTitle 18, United States Code, Secrions 159f(a) and f59f@)(f).
CO t4
(Sex Trafficking by Force, Fraud or Coercion)
The Grand Jury Further Charges That:
From in or about Jvte 2014 and continuing through in or about January 2016, the
exact dates being unknown, in the Western Distria of New York, and elsewhere, the
defendant, OLMR KIMMONS alWa Ollie alk/a AJi, did knowingly, in and affecting
interstate collmerce, recnrit, entice, harbor, transpon, provide, obtain, advertise, maintain,
patronize, and solicit by any means, Victim 5, a person known to the Grand Jury, and did
benefit financially and by receiving anything of value from panicipation in a venture which
has engaged in such acts, knowing and, except where the act constituting the violation is
advertising, in reckless disregard of the fact that means of force, threats of force, fraud,
coercion, and a combination of zuch means, would be used to cause Victim 5 to engage in a
commercial sex act.
All in violation ofTitle 18, Urited States Code, Sections 1591(a) and fsgf(bxl).
8
9. FIRST FORFEITT]RE ALLEGATION
(Controlled Subst^nce Proceeds)
The Graad Jury Alleges That:
Upon his conviction of any of Couns I through 9 of this Second Superseding
Indictment, the defendant, OLfVER KIMMONS a/W a Ollie a/k/ a AJi, shall forfeit ro rhe
United States any and all property constituting and derived from any proceeds obtained,
directly and indirectly, as a result of zuch violations and any and all property used, and
intended to be used, in any manner and part, to commit and to facilitate the commission of
such violations, including, but not limited to:
MONETARYSUMS:
The sum of two thousand, six hundred and eighty dollars ($2,680)
United States currency, surrendered to officers by KIMMONS durilg a
vehicle stop in the vicinity of 30252 Lockport Olcott Road, Newfane,
New York on July 3, 2014;
The sum of seven hundred dollars ($700) United States currenry, seized
by officers during a search warrant executed at 622 Walnut Sffeet,
Lockport, New York on February 12,2015; and
The sum of one hundred sixty-seven dollars ($167) United States
currency, seized by officers from KIMMONS' pocket during a traffic
stop at South Transit Road, Lockport, New York on February 5,2016;
and
The sum of one thousand sixty-three dollars ($1,063) United States
currency, seized by officers during a search warant executed at 6559
Lincoln Place, Lockport, New York on February 5,2016.
AII pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Sectioas 853(aX1) aad 853(a)(2).
a
b
d
10. SECOND FORFEITTJRE ALLEGATION
(Sex Traffi cking Proceeds)
The Grand Jury Further Alleges That:
Upon his conviction of any of Counts l0 through 14 of this Second Superseding
Indictrnent, the defendant, OLIYER KIMMONS a/k/a OlTie a/k/a AJi, shall forfeit to the
United States any and all property constituting or derived from any proceeds obtained,
directly and indirectly, as a result of such violations or any property traceable to such property
or any property used, and intended to be used, in any manner and part, to commit and to
facilitate the commission of such violations, including, but not limited to:
MOIYETARYSUMS
The zum of two thousand, six hundred and eighty dollars ($2,680)
United States crurency, surrendered to officers by KIMMONS during a
vehicle stop in the vicinity of 30252 Lockport Olcott Road, Newfane,
New York on July 3, 2014;
The sum of seven hundred dollars ($700) Unitea States currency, seized
by officers during a search warrant executed at 622 Walnut Sffeet,
Lockport, New York on February 12,2015; arld
The sum of one hundred sixty-seven dollars (9167) United States
currency, seized by officers from KIMMONS' pocket duriag a traffic
stop at South Transit Road, Lockport, New York on February 5,2016;
and
b
c.
10
a.
11. The sum of one thousand sixty-three dollars ($1,063) United States
curency, seized by officers during a search warrant executed at 6559
Lincoln Place, Lockport, New York on February 5,2016.
All pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Secion 1594(d).
DATED: Buffalo, New York, April 12, 2018.
JAMES P. KENNEDY, JR.
United States Attomey
BY: S/MEGIIANA. TOKASH
Assistant United States Attomey
United States Attomey's Office
Westem District of New York
138 Delaware Avenue
Buffalo, New York 14202
7t6/U3-5860
Meghan.Tokash@usdoj. gov
A TRUE BILL:
S/FOREPERSON
d
11