For many courses, OER already exist, but where to look for them? And when we find them will they look like what we expect? OER vary widely in format and quality. This session addresses the challenges of locating appropriate OER and suggests strategies for searching, evaluation, and attribution.
3. What Faculty Want
Quality OER
It does not have to take hours hunting them down
Two Preliminary Questions Will Save You Time
What type(s) of OER are you looking for?
What do you want to do with the OER? Simply use? Remix?
4. A Few Recommendations
● Seek help from librarians
“I wish I had talked to the librarian first, she saved me hours of time.”
● Consider your college library as a source of OER
● Use established repositories with robust discovery tools
○ OER Commons
○ Creative Commons
○ Merlot II
● Monitor organizations/communities spearheading the conversation
○ Rebus
● Google – “OER in ….[academic subject]. You will often find library
research guides with lists of OER search engines, institutional
repositories, and resources.
○ Open Textbook Library
○ Openstax
○ SPARC
6. And What is a Fauxpen?
It is all the illegally digitized ‘stuff’
you find on the web
7. Breaking Down Barriers
https://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/oer.html
Not enough resources for my subject
Too hard to find what I need
No comprehensive catalog of resources
Not used by other faculty I know
Not high-quality
Not knowing if I have permission to use or change
Not current, up-to-date
Too difficult to integrate into technology I use
Lack of support from my institution
Too difficult to change or edit
Barriers to Adopting OER
8. How YOU Can Support Open
Create OER when you find a gap
Update existing OER
Let colleagues know that you use OER
Share your syllabus as OER
Share editable formats
Write an open peer reviewed article
Edit a Wikipedia entry
11. Kicking the Tires
● Does it align with
course objectives?
● Is the content current,
clear, authoritative?
● What uses are
permitted by the
license?
● Does it function on
intended platform?
● Are practice exercises
clear?
● Does it comply with
accessibility standards?
12. Evaluation Criteria
1. Comprehensiveness
2. Content Accuracy
3. Relevance/Longevity
4. Clarity
5. Consistency
6. Modularity
7. Organization/ Structure/ Flow
8. Interface
9. Grammatical Errors
10. Cultural Relevance
http://open.umn.edu/opentextbooks/ReviewRubric.aspx
This rubric was developed by our friends at BCcampus, and can be
found at http://open.bccampus.ca/. It is a derivative of the Peer
Review criteria used by Saylor.org, available at
http://www.saylor.org/open-textbook-challenge-peer-review-criteria/,
which is a derivative of the review rubric used by College Open
Textbooks, available at
http://collegeopentextbooks.ning.com/page/review-2 which was
adapted from the American Library Association Choice Selection Policy
found at http://www.ala.org/acrl/choice/selectionpolicy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0
Unported license.
13. Acknowledging the Work of OER Creators
OER aren’t “free” for their creators
Use best practices for attribution
TASL
Title
Author
Source (link)
License
15. This work, "Golden Reading Open", is a derivative of "Golden Reading Barron's
Dog Training Bible" by Andrea Arden, used under CC BY 2.0. "Golden Reading
Open" is licensed under CC BY 4.0 by Christin Wixson.
16. Hands-on Exercise
1. Find an OER you could use in your teaching, make sure it has a CC
license
2. Evaluate what you found using given criteria
3. Cite it using Creative Commons Wiki: Best Practices for Attribution
https://wiki.creativecommons.org/wiki/Best_practices_for_attribution
Extra Credit
1. Attempt to edit the OER
2. Cite the edited OER
library.granite.edu/open
library.plymouth.edu/oer
libraryguides.unh.edu/oer
Editor's Notes
Hi Pat, this is the repository slide I made. Since you’re covering that, I put it here for your consideration, but do let me know if you’re not feeling it and I’ll delete it. ~Christin
Reasonable expectations
The number 1 barrier is not having enough resources in a particular subject area → the number 1 thing you can do to promote OER is to fill those gaps.
Also bring an OER up to date.
Mention that in this presentation we will alleviate several of these (hard to find, quality/evaluation, knowing if I have permission)
Those barriers are our opportunities.
OPEN will only gain credibility, quality, buy-in if we support it and contribute.
Many of these suggestions point back to the barriers from the Babson survey.
Faculty discretion to choose course materials is a strength at our institutions, the responsibility and choice is on you, what are you going to choose?
Respect the fact that other people are putting their effort and work into OERs by contributing your own work and effort or money. Eg: many free apps online have a paid version. Use the paid version of things you use a lot and that really benefit your life.
If you’re not contributing time or money, why do you expect to find exactly what you want?
Faculty discretion to choose course materials is a strength at our institutions, the responsibility and choice is on you, what are you going to choose?
Discuss faculty levels of awareness of OER – these are low. Whatever your comfort level of OER use, you can help by talking about what you’re doing.
You are not going to find a completely free version of your specialty $300 textbook or that proprietary software. But you can build what you nened.
What you do find might be more interesting than a textbook, and create and information environment for your students that supports lifelong learning.
If you find an imperfect OER, could improving it be a project within your course? Can it be used to help teach evaluation skills, and serve as an entry point into a scholarly conversation for your students?If there are serious OER gaps in area in which you teach, consider creating and sharing resources. You might be able to do this as part of you regular work, or to find supplemental funding.
Rubrics and Peer review
http://www.csuchico.edu/lins/handouts/eval_websites.pdf
http://www.rcampus.com/rubricshowc.cfm?code=L9WC6X&sp=yes
http://www.collegeopentextbooks.org/about-us/contactus/34-cot/cot-category/101-evaluation-criteria
http://www.affordablelearninggeorgia.org/find_textbooks/selecting_textbooks
How you repay is with acknowledgement.
“You may satisfy the conditions in (1) and (2) above in any reasonable manner based on the medium, means and context in which the Licensed Material is used.”
“There is no one right way; just make sure your attribution is reasonable and suited to the medium you're working with.”
“Images used in the cover design are licensed under CC0 Public Domain.”