This document provides a geospatial analysis of Amendment 2, known as the Safe Harbor Act, which passed overwhelmingly in Georgia in November 2016. The analysis examines the spatial relationships between voting results, locations of strip clubs, and addresses of registered sex offenders to determine if the funding sources identified in the amendment are appropriate. Three hypotheses are tested: 1) Voting changed in areas with more strip clubs, 2) Voting changed in areas with more crime, and 3) Areas with more strip clubs have more crime. The analysis finds some support for hypotheses 1 and 2 but not 3. It concludes that while sex offender penalties are fair, strip clubs are penalized unfairly, and resources would be better allocated in lower-income areas with more