This document provides an overview of new biosimilar regulations including definitions of biologics and biosimilars. It discusses FDA guidance on pharmacological and scientific testing, labeling, and naming of biosimilars. It also covers the clinical development process for biosimilars including required pre-clinical and clinical studies as well as pharmacovigilance after approval.
- Comparative studies demonstrated that PF-05280586, a potential biosimilar to rituximab, has similar structural, functional, and toxicity profiles as rituximab from the EU and US.
- A clinical study in patients with rheumatoid arthritis found similar pharmacokinetics between PF-05280586 and both EU- and US-sourced rituximab, as well as similar safety profiles.
- The data support continued development of PF-05280586 as a potential biosimilar to rituximab that could improve access to treatment.
Bruno Flamion, Professor of Physiology and Pharmacology, Molecular Physiology Research Unit, University of Namur
Presentation at EIPG – VAPI-UPIP Symposium “Biotech and Advanced Therapies: Challenges and Opportunities” at the Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Campus Jette, Vrije Universiteit van Brussel, Brussels 2013
HUMAN CHALLENGE STUDIES TO ACCELERATE CORONA VIRUS VACCINE LICENSUREJAYA PRAKASH VELUCHURI
This document proposes conducting human challenge studies to accelerate the development and licensure of coronavirus vaccines. It outlines a proposed study design where volunteers would be exposed to SARS-CoV-2 after receiving a candidate vaccine or placebo. If efficacy was shown, an expanded safety study of 3000+ people would be conducted. Together, these could potentially cut 1-1.5 years off the standard development timeline and save thousands or millions of lives. Appropriate precautions and oversight would be needed given the risks of exposing volunteers to the virus.
This document provides an overview of bioequivalence and drug product assessment. It defines key terms like bioequivalence and pharmaceutical equivalence. It discusses the need for and types of bioequivalence studies. The document outlines the objectives and statistical evaluation of bioequivalence data. It also describes different study designs like randomized crossover designs and factors to consider like food effects. Furthermore, it discusses the types of evidence required to establish bioequivalence and conditions for biowaivers.
This document provides an overview of the regulatory guidelines for developing and marketing biologics in Europe. It discusses the EU guidelines for non-clinical and clinical studies from trials through approval. For non-clinical studies, the CHMP has adopted ICH S6 and its addendum which provides guidance on species selection, study design, immunogenicity, reproductive/developmental toxicity, and carcinogenicity assessments. Clinical studies must comply with the Clinical Trials Directive and guidelines on GCP, informed consent, data handling and confidentiality. The marketing authorization application process is similar to other products but requires additional information specific to biologics manufacturing.
Legal requirements for generics and abridged products and bioequivalenceinemet
This document summarizes key concepts related to legal requirements for generic and abridged drug products, including definitions, regulations, bioequivalence, and pros and cons of generic drugs. It discusses definitions of innovator products, generic medicines, pharmaceutical equivalence and alternatives. It also covers requirements for generic drug applications, marketing authorizations, and the need to demonstrate bioequivalence to the reference product through appropriate studies. Guidelines for bioavailability and bioequivalence studies from regulatory authorities are mentioned.
- Comparative studies demonstrated that PF-05280586, a potential biosimilar to rituximab, has similar structural, functional, and toxicity profiles as rituximab from the EU and US.
- A clinical study in patients with rheumatoid arthritis found similar pharmacokinetics between PF-05280586 and both EU- and US-sourced rituximab, as well as similar safety profiles.
- The data support continued development of PF-05280586 as a potential biosimilar to rituximab that could improve access to treatment.
Bruno Flamion, Professor of Physiology and Pharmacology, Molecular Physiology Research Unit, University of Namur
Presentation at EIPG – VAPI-UPIP Symposium “Biotech and Advanced Therapies: Challenges and Opportunities” at the Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Campus Jette, Vrije Universiteit van Brussel, Brussels 2013
HUMAN CHALLENGE STUDIES TO ACCELERATE CORONA VIRUS VACCINE LICENSUREJAYA PRAKASH VELUCHURI
This document proposes conducting human challenge studies to accelerate the development and licensure of coronavirus vaccines. It outlines a proposed study design where volunteers would be exposed to SARS-CoV-2 after receiving a candidate vaccine or placebo. If efficacy was shown, an expanded safety study of 3000+ people would be conducted. Together, these could potentially cut 1-1.5 years off the standard development timeline and save thousands or millions of lives. Appropriate precautions and oversight would be needed given the risks of exposing volunteers to the virus.
This document provides an overview of bioequivalence and drug product assessment. It defines key terms like bioequivalence and pharmaceutical equivalence. It discusses the need for and types of bioequivalence studies. The document outlines the objectives and statistical evaluation of bioequivalence data. It also describes different study designs like randomized crossover designs and factors to consider like food effects. Furthermore, it discusses the types of evidence required to establish bioequivalence and conditions for biowaivers.
This document provides an overview of the regulatory guidelines for developing and marketing biologics in Europe. It discusses the EU guidelines for non-clinical and clinical studies from trials through approval. For non-clinical studies, the CHMP has adopted ICH S6 and its addendum which provides guidance on species selection, study design, immunogenicity, reproductive/developmental toxicity, and carcinogenicity assessments. Clinical studies must comply with the Clinical Trials Directive and guidelines on GCP, informed consent, data handling and confidentiality. The marketing authorization application process is similar to other products but requires additional information specific to biologics manufacturing.
Legal requirements for generics and abridged products and bioequivalenceinemet
This document summarizes key concepts related to legal requirements for generic and abridged drug products, including definitions, regulations, bioequivalence, and pros and cons of generic drugs. It discusses definitions of innovator products, generic medicines, pharmaceutical equivalence and alternatives. It also covers requirements for generic drug applications, marketing authorizations, and the need to demonstrate bioequivalence to the reference product through appropriate studies. Guidelines for bioavailability and bioequivalence studies from regulatory authorities are mentioned.
“EU regulatory and clinical development framework for biosimilars”
Explains the current EU experience and practices relating to the submission and approval of biosimilars
Regulation of biosimilars in India is overseen by the Central Drugs Standard Control Organization (CDSCO). Biosimilars must demonstrate similarity to an approved reference biologic in terms of quality, safety and efficacy through comparative clinical and preclinical studies. The guidelines allow for waiving late-stage clinical trials if early studies show high similarity. Three approval protocols exist based on whether the product is indigenous or imported and if the final product contains genetically modified organisms. Biosimilars offer to increase access to biologic treatments in India at a lower cost than originator biologics.
AN OVERVIEW ON FIXED DOSE COMBINATIONS AND ITS REGULATIONS IN INDIA JAYA PRAKASH VELUCHURI
This document provides an overview of fixed dose combination drugs and regulatory requirements for FDCs in India. It discusses the classification of FDCs, clinical trial requirements, bioavailability and bioequivalence data requirements. It also addresses the reasons why 328 FDCs were banned in India, including that they were found to have no therapeutic justification and safer alternatives were available. Success factors for FDCs include addressing formulation challenges, patent feasibility, and physician considerations.
The document discusses the regulatory requirements for approval of biologics. It defines biologics as complex molecules produced through biotechnology from biological sources. The regulatory authority for biologics is the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) within the FDA. The approval process involves an Investigational New Drug Application, Biologics License Application, and approval or refusal. Key differences between biologics and chemical drugs are outlined regarding size, structure, stability and manufacturing. Regulatory guidelines in the US and EU are compared.
The document discusses generic drugs, including their regulatory approval process. Generic drugs must demonstrate bioequivalence to the branded version to gain approval. They are approved through an abbreviated new drug application that shows they deliver the same amount of active ingredients as the branded drug. India has a large and growing generic drug industry that supplies over 30% of the global generic market. Recent FDA rules now require generic drug makers to pay user fees for product approvals.
Significance of BA/BE studies in drug research and evaluation of different as...inemet
PharmaCon2007 Congress, Dubrovnik, Croatia "New Technologies and Trends in Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Industry and Education" http://www.pharmacon2007.com
Abstract is available at http://www.pharmaconnectme.com
This document discusses biosimilars and their regulation. It begins with a brief history of biotechnology and biopharmaceuticals. It then defines biosimilars as similar but not generic versions of biologic drugs whose patents have expired. The document outlines key differences between biosimilars and generic drugs, including their larger and more complex molecular structures. It also discusses concerns regarding biosimilar efficacy, safety, interchangeability, and pharmacovigilance. Finally, it provides an overview of regulatory frameworks for biosimilars in various regions like the EU, US, India, and WHO guidelines.
This presentation mainly deals with clinical development of biosimilar products. It also gives enough on non-clinical development so that the audience is well oriented.
This document discusses the regulatory requirements for clinical development of biosimilars in India. It provides an overview of the applicable regulations, guidelines, and authorities overseeing clinical trials. The key principles for developing biosimilars are to demonstrate comparability to the reference biologic through a stepwise characterization and clinical development program involving pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and confirmatory safety and efficacy studies. Post-marketing requirements include pharmacovigilance plans and potential post-marketing studies to further evaluate safety and immunogenicity.
The Biologics Market was worth USD 267.58 billion in 2014 and is expected to reach approximately USD 373.66 billion by 2023, while registering itself at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 3.78% during the forecast period. Biologics are medicates as hereditarily built proteins, got from human qualities. According to the US FDA, biologics can be made out of sugars, proteins, or nucleic acids or complex blends of these substances, or might live elements, for example, cells and tissues. The biologic medications are taken from an assortment of regular sources, for example, people, creatures, or microorganisms and comprise of items, for example, antibodies, blood and blood parts, allergenic, substantial cells, quality treatment, tissues, and recombinant remedial proteins. Propelled biotechnology strategies and complex procedures are utilized to produce biologics. They are at the cutting edge of biomedical research.
The document summarizes trends in research and development of generic drugs in the global pharmaceutical industry. It provides an overview of historical developments in generic drug maker PLIVA dating back to 1928, and its combination with Barr Group in 2006 to form a global generic pharmaceutical company. It also discusses trends in the generic drug market, strategies for differentiation, and key factors for success in generic drug research and development, emphasizing the importance of speed, intellectual property positioning, and internal API development capabilities.
Presentation at the Biosimilars and Follow-On Biologics 2014 Americas Conference, sponsored by Paradigm Global Events, February 12, 2014. Presentation focused on:
•Interchangeability
•State Substitution Laws
•Naming
•Risk Evaluation & Mitigation Strategies (REMS) and Their Impact on Biosimilars
•Where FDA Stands on Biosimilars
USFDA Approval Process For Drug Products & Biological Product i.e NDA Vs. BLA
Comparison of NDA and BLA application process in USA. IND, NDA, ANDA & BLA dossier submission procedure.
Investigation of medicinal product dossierDeeptiGupta154
This document discusses the investigation of medicinal product dossiers (IMPDs) which are required for clinical trial approval in the European Union. There are two main steps for drug approval: clinical trial application and marketing authorization application. IMPDs contain information about the investigational medicinal product including protocols, informed consent forms, and risk management plans. IMPDs can be full or simplified depending on previous submissions. An investigator brochure is also required and provides clinical and non-clinical data on the investigational product to investigators. It differs from an IMPD which focuses more on development and manufacturing details.
Where are you in your drug development journey? Find out how to expedite your drug development program. View our drug development journey map. Download the document to zoom in and view details.
The drug development process involves several phases of clinical trials overseen by regulatory agencies. Drugs must first show safety in pre-clinical animal and lab testing before entering human trials. Clinical trials involve 3 phases - Phase I tests safety in small groups, Phase II assesses efficacy and optimal dosing in larger groups of patients, and Phase III confirms efficacy in even larger groups. If results are positive, the drug company submits a New Drug Application to the regulatory agency which can take 2-3 years to review before approving the drug for the market. Post-market studies in Phase IV further monitor long-term safety and efficacy. The entire process from discovery to market approval takes an average of 10-15 years and over $1 billion
This document provides an overview of post-marketing surveillance requirements for drug products. It discusses general reporting requirements including field alert reports, annual reports, labeling changes, and adverse event reporting. The key aspects of post-marketing surveillance are monitoring adverse drug reactions, ensuring compliance with manufacturing standards, and completing any agreed upon Phase IV clinical studies. Maintaining vigilance during post-marketing surveillance is important to discover new safety risks and provide additional information on a drug's benefits and risks.
“EU regulatory and clinical development framework for biosimilars”
Explains the current EU experience and practices relating to the submission and approval of biosimilars
Regulation of biosimilars in India is overseen by the Central Drugs Standard Control Organization (CDSCO). Biosimilars must demonstrate similarity to an approved reference biologic in terms of quality, safety and efficacy through comparative clinical and preclinical studies. The guidelines allow for waiving late-stage clinical trials if early studies show high similarity. Three approval protocols exist based on whether the product is indigenous or imported and if the final product contains genetically modified organisms. Biosimilars offer to increase access to biologic treatments in India at a lower cost than originator biologics.
AN OVERVIEW ON FIXED DOSE COMBINATIONS AND ITS REGULATIONS IN INDIA JAYA PRAKASH VELUCHURI
This document provides an overview of fixed dose combination drugs and regulatory requirements for FDCs in India. It discusses the classification of FDCs, clinical trial requirements, bioavailability and bioequivalence data requirements. It also addresses the reasons why 328 FDCs were banned in India, including that they were found to have no therapeutic justification and safer alternatives were available. Success factors for FDCs include addressing formulation challenges, patent feasibility, and physician considerations.
The document discusses the regulatory requirements for approval of biologics. It defines biologics as complex molecules produced through biotechnology from biological sources. The regulatory authority for biologics is the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) within the FDA. The approval process involves an Investigational New Drug Application, Biologics License Application, and approval or refusal. Key differences between biologics and chemical drugs are outlined regarding size, structure, stability and manufacturing. Regulatory guidelines in the US and EU are compared.
The document discusses generic drugs, including their regulatory approval process. Generic drugs must demonstrate bioequivalence to the branded version to gain approval. They are approved through an abbreviated new drug application that shows they deliver the same amount of active ingredients as the branded drug. India has a large and growing generic drug industry that supplies over 30% of the global generic market. Recent FDA rules now require generic drug makers to pay user fees for product approvals.
Significance of BA/BE studies in drug research and evaluation of different as...inemet
PharmaCon2007 Congress, Dubrovnik, Croatia "New Technologies and Trends in Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Industry and Education" http://www.pharmacon2007.com
Abstract is available at http://www.pharmaconnectme.com
This document discusses biosimilars and their regulation. It begins with a brief history of biotechnology and biopharmaceuticals. It then defines biosimilars as similar but not generic versions of biologic drugs whose patents have expired. The document outlines key differences between biosimilars and generic drugs, including their larger and more complex molecular structures. It also discusses concerns regarding biosimilar efficacy, safety, interchangeability, and pharmacovigilance. Finally, it provides an overview of regulatory frameworks for biosimilars in various regions like the EU, US, India, and WHO guidelines.
This presentation mainly deals with clinical development of biosimilar products. It also gives enough on non-clinical development so that the audience is well oriented.
This document discusses the regulatory requirements for clinical development of biosimilars in India. It provides an overview of the applicable regulations, guidelines, and authorities overseeing clinical trials. The key principles for developing biosimilars are to demonstrate comparability to the reference biologic through a stepwise characterization and clinical development program involving pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and confirmatory safety and efficacy studies. Post-marketing requirements include pharmacovigilance plans and potential post-marketing studies to further evaluate safety and immunogenicity.
The Biologics Market was worth USD 267.58 billion in 2014 and is expected to reach approximately USD 373.66 billion by 2023, while registering itself at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 3.78% during the forecast period. Biologics are medicates as hereditarily built proteins, got from human qualities. According to the US FDA, biologics can be made out of sugars, proteins, or nucleic acids or complex blends of these substances, or might live elements, for example, cells and tissues. The biologic medications are taken from an assortment of regular sources, for example, people, creatures, or microorganisms and comprise of items, for example, antibodies, blood and blood parts, allergenic, substantial cells, quality treatment, tissues, and recombinant remedial proteins. Propelled biotechnology strategies and complex procedures are utilized to produce biologics. They are at the cutting edge of biomedical research.
The document summarizes trends in research and development of generic drugs in the global pharmaceutical industry. It provides an overview of historical developments in generic drug maker PLIVA dating back to 1928, and its combination with Barr Group in 2006 to form a global generic pharmaceutical company. It also discusses trends in the generic drug market, strategies for differentiation, and key factors for success in generic drug research and development, emphasizing the importance of speed, intellectual property positioning, and internal API development capabilities.
Presentation at the Biosimilars and Follow-On Biologics 2014 Americas Conference, sponsored by Paradigm Global Events, February 12, 2014. Presentation focused on:
•Interchangeability
•State Substitution Laws
•Naming
•Risk Evaluation & Mitigation Strategies (REMS) and Their Impact on Biosimilars
•Where FDA Stands on Biosimilars
USFDA Approval Process For Drug Products & Biological Product i.e NDA Vs. BLA
Comparison of NDA and BLA application process in USA. IND, NDA, ANDA & BLA dossier submission procedure.
Investigation of medicinal product dossierDeeptiGupta154
This document discusses the investigation of medicinal product dossiers (IMPDs) which are required for clinical trial approval in the European Union. There are two main steps for drug approval: clinical trial application and marketing authorization application. IMPDs contain information about the investigational medicinal product including protocols, informed consent forms, and risk management plans. IMPDs can be full or simplified depending on previous submissions. An investigator brochure is also required and provides clinical and non-clinical data on the investigational product to investigators. It differs from an IMPD which focuses more on development and manufacturing details.
Where are you in your drug development journey? Find out how to expedite your drug development program. View our drug development journey map. Download the document to zoom in and view details.
The drug development process involves several phases of clinical trials overseen by regulatory agencies. Drugs must first show safety in pre-clinical animal and lab testing before entering human trials. Clinical trials involve 3 phases - Phase I tests safety in small groups, Phase II assesses efficacy and optimal dosing in larger groups of patients, and Phase III confirms efficacy in even larger groups. If results are positive, the drug company submits a New Drug Application to the regulatory agency which can take 2-3 years to review before approving the drug for the market. Post-market studies in Phase IV further monitor long-term safety and efficacy. The entire process from discovery to market approval takes an average of 10-15 years and over $1 billion
This document provides an overview of post-marketing surveillance requirements for drug products. It discusses general reporting requirements including field alert reports, annual reports, labeling changes, and adverse event reporting. The key aspects of post-marketing surveillance are monitoring adverse drug reactions, ensuring compliance with manufacturing standards, and completing any agreed upon Phase IV clinical studies. Maintaining vigilance during post-marketing surveillance is important to discover new safety risks and provide additional information on a drug's benefits and risks.
This document discusses the various phases of clinical trials for drug development. It begins with preclinical testing on animals. Next is the investigational new drug application (IND) to obtain approval for human testing. Clinical trials then proceed through four phases to evaluate a drug's safety, efficacy, and dosing in humans. Phase 1 involves initial safety and dosing tests on healthy volunteers. Phase 2 expands to more subjects to further assess safety and efficacy. Phase 3 involves large-scale trials to confirm effectiveness. After approval, Phase 4 involves post-marketing surveillance. The overall goal is to generate sufficient data to submit a new drug application (NDA) and gain regulatory approval to market a new pharmaceutical drug.
21CFR 320- BIO AVAILABILITY AND BIO EQUIVALENCE REQUIREMENTSPallavi Christeen
this presentation describes briefly about Bioavailability and Bioequivalence requirements as per US FDA Code of Federal Regulations under title 21 and chapter 320
This document provides an overview of Schedule Y, which establishes requirements and guidelines for conducting clinical trials and obtaining permission to import or manufacture new drugs in India. Schedule Y aims to frame guidelines for clinical research in line with global standards. It outlines application procedures, ethics committee requirements, pre-clinical and clinical data to be submitted, protocol elements, and other rules to ensure safety and efficacy of investigational products. The objectives of Schedule Y are to regulate clinical trials and new drugs in India according to current scenarios and integrate the country into global drug development while improving clinical trial quality.
Post-marketing surveillance involves monitoring drug safety after market release. It identifies rare or long-term adverse effects not seen in clinical trials. Manufacturers must report serious adverse events to regulatory agencies. Outsourcing bioavailability and bioequivalence studies to contract research organizations allows companies to access expertise and resources while reducing costs and time to market. CROs conduct clinical trials, data analysis, and reporting according to Good Clinical Practice standards. Qualification of appropriate CROs involves assessing capabilities, infrastructure, compliance history, and collaboration effectiveness.
Looking Beyond Biosimilarity - Importance of Patient Safety: Presentation of...drsomduttprasad
Here is my presentation at FOCUS 2016, the XXIVth Annual Conference of the Bombay Ophthalmologists' Association held from August 19-21, 2016 at ITC Maratha, Hyatt Regency & Hilton, Sahar, Mumbai.
Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) & Waiver of BioequivalenceAjaz Hussain
Graduate Lecture at the University of Maryland (August 2012). Learning Objective: Identify and explain how future regulatory applications of BCS may be realized in the context of ‘Quality by Design’.
Updated July 2013.
I wish to thank all the viewers of my Slideshare presentation of the development and application of the US FDA’s BCS Guidance 2000. Over 11K views have been recorded making this the 2nd highest viewed presentation. FDA is expected to issue a revised BCS draft guidance in the next few weeks. Expected changes include the following:
1. Addition of ‘very rapid’ dissolution criteria (>85% in 15 minutes)
2. Change permeability boundary from 90% to 85%
3. Change the pH solubility range from 1 – 7.5 to 1 – 6.8
4. Possibility of changing paddle speed from 50 to 75 rpm.
5. Additional topics / clarification on FDCs (Fixed Dose Combinations), ODTs (Orally Disintegrating Tablets), MR (Modified Release) products.
6. Update the list of model drugs.
7. Strengthen GI stability requirement.
This document provides guidelines for the non-clinical and clinical evaluation of biosimilar monoclonal antibodies. It recommends a step-wise approach to non-clinical and clinical development to establish comparability between a biosimilar and reference product. For non-clinical studies, it recommends initial in vitro studies followed by a determination of need for in vivo studies. For clinical studies, it recommends initial pharmacokinetic studies followed by pharmacodynamic and comparative efficacy and safety trials. It also addresses extrapolation of indications and post-approval pharmacovigilance requirements. The goal is to demonstrate similar safety and efficacy while ensuring the safety and efficacy established for the reference product is maintained.
“Approaches to evaluation of various groups of biological products in Russia”
Provides an overview of the current assessment approaches applicable to biotherapeutics in the Russian Federation
Review on Pharmacivigilance and mucomycocis disease VaishnaviMore55
This document outlines the course structure and contents for a Practice School pharmacovigilance course. It includes an introduction to pharmacovigilance, definitions, clinical research principles, good clinical practices, adverse drug reaction identification and assessment. It also discusses ICH E2E guidelines, selection of the antifungal drug Amphotericin B for analysis, identification of its adverse effects through patient interviews and hospital visits.
“WHO Medicines Safety Programme: Pharmacovigilance and risk minimization programs for biological products”
Illustrates the WHO work program on pharmacovigilance, with a focus on both small molecule chemically-synthesized medicines and biotherapeutics
There has been a parallel advancement in the field of biosimilars with other recent biologic medications like cell line science and protein expression science. These are molecules that are chemically similar to their already approved biological medication counterparts which enable a faster and more cost-effective production as they only require one clinical trial, unlike the reference product which has to usually undergo two. Recently, various biosimilars for ophthalmic use have been developed and studied in various parts of the world.
MARKETING AUTHORISATION, LICENSING AND QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF VACCINES IN INDI...Swapnil Fernandes
- European pharmaceutical legislation provides a comprehensive framework for the marketing authorisation of vaccines.
- In contrast to the European scenario, the Indian scenario for vaccines is relatively less regulated and follows the same process of approval as other biologics in spite of having a National Handbook for Vaccine Policy.
- Vaccine authorisation in the US, as is the case in EU, is a more straightforward process than in most other markets as the USFDA has provided vaccines with a distinct set of regulations in concerned areas of safety and quality.
This document discusses regulatory issues related to evaluating biotechnology-derived pharmaceuticals. It defines key terms like biopharmaceuticals, biosimilars, and biogenerics. The EU and US have different regulatory approaches and definitions. In India, products are currently referred to as biogenerics and regulated under Schedule Y, though new guidelines are being developed. The presentation outlines important considerations for preclinical safety testing of biologics, including relevant animal species selection, dose levels, routes of administration, and key study types needed like toxicity, immunogenicity, reproductive, and carcinogenicity assessments.
Clinical Pharmacology in Orphan Drug DevelopmentE. Dennis Bashaw
This is the fourth talk that I gave in Asia back in May. It was presented at the Konect (Korea National Enterprise for Clinical Trials) 3rd symposia that was held in Seoul at Seoul National University.
Previously certain classes of active substances were required to be manufactured in dedicated or segregated self-contained facilities Certain antibiotics, Certain hormones, Certain cytotoxic ,Certain highly active drugs .This was due to the perceived risk of these active substances.
Pharmaceuticals not covered under these criteria were addressed by a cleaning validation process This involved reduction of the concentration of residual active substance to a level where the maximum carryover from the total equipment train would result in no greater than 1/1000th of the lowest clinical dose of the contaminating substance in the maximum daily dosage of the next product to be manufactured.
This criterion was applied concurrently with a maximum permitted contamination of 10 ppm of the previous active substance in the next product manufactured. Whichever of these criteria resulted in the lowest carryover, constituted the limit applied for cleaning validation. However, these limits did not take account of the available pharmacological and toxicological data They may have been too restrictive or not restrictive enough. EMA therefore felt for a more scientific case by case approach for all classes of pharmaceutical substances.
New EMA Requirements : Cleaning Validation Limits based on PDE
final project
1. Yury Viknevich
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Science
Pharmacy Candidate 2017
Fulfillment Room, 8/10/2016
New biosimilar regulations
2. Overview
Definitions
FDA guidances
• Pharmacological &
scientific testing
• Labeling
• Naming
Clinical development
of biosimilars
Pipeline & News
2
Google image
| New biosimilar regulations | Yury Viknevich | 8/10/16| Novartis | Business Use Only
3. Definition-Biologics
| New biosimilar regulations | Yury Viknevich | 8/10/16| Novartis | Business Use Only
3
•Composed of either a single
component/combination of sugars,
proteins, nucleic acids, or may be
living entities
•Isolated from natural sources
Available from:
http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/OfficeofMedicalProductsandTobacco/CBER/ucm133077.htm, 8/3/16
4. Biologics vs. small molecules: complexity
comparison
| New biosimilar regulations | Yury Viknevich | 8/10/16| Novartis | Business Use Only
Available from:
https://www.google.com/search?q=zarxio&biw=1976&bih=1088&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwif_PTkobTOAhVIlR4KHdN_
A3YQ_AUIBygC&dpr=0.85#tbm=isch&q=filgrastim+molecular+structure&imgrc=U1a7NOgBRrJH0M%3A, 8/4/16
5. Definition-Biosimilars
| New biosimilar regulations | Yury Viknevich | 8/10/16| Novartis | Business Use Only
5
•Biological product that is approved and is
highly similar to an FDA-approved
biological product (ie. reference product)
•Has no clinically meaningful differences in
terms of safety and efficacy from the
reference product
Available from:
http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/HowDrugsareDevelopedandApproved/ApprovalApplications/Therapeutic
BiologicApplications/Biosimilars/, 8/3/16
.
6. Definition-Biosimilars
| New biosimilar regulations | Yury Viknevich | 8/10/16| Novartis | Business Use Only
6
They are not generics
•Unique and can never be identical to the reference
product
FDA requires these products to meet rigorous
standards for safety and efficacy
Available from:
http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/HowDrugsareDevelopedandApproved/ApprovalApplications/Therape
uticBiologicApplications/Biosimilars/, 8/3/16
7. FDA guidances: Biosimilars
| New biosimilar regulations | Yury Viknevich | 8/10/16| Novartis | Business Use OnlyAvailable from:
http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/HowDrugsareDevelopedandApproved/ApprovalApplications/TherapeuticBiologicApplications/Biosimilars/ucm241720.ht
m, 8/9/16
8. Testing-required by FDA
•Comparative animal and human PK and PD data
- Demonstrate PK and PD similarity
- Assess clinically meaningful differences between the
proposed biosimilar and the reference product
•Support a demonstration of biosimilarity with the
assumption that similar exposure (and PD response)
provides similar efficacy and safety
| New biosimilar regulations | Yury Viknevich | 8/10/16| Novartis | Business Use Only
Available from:
http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/HowDrugsareDevelopedandApproved/ApprovalApplications/TherapeuticBiologicApplications/Biosimilars/UC
M428732.pdf, 8/4/16
9. Overview of pre-clinical studies
| New biosimilar regulations | Yury Viknevich | 8/10/16| Novartis | Business Use Only
Available from:
http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/HowDrugsareDevelopedandApproved/ApprovalApplications/TherapeuticBiologicApplications/Biosimilars/UC
M428732.pdf, 8/3/16
10. Pre-clinical study-Demonstrating
biosimilarity
| New biosimilar regulations | Yury Viknevich | 8/10/16| Novartis | Business Use Only
10
Structural analysis
• Demonstrate that the product is similar to the reference product
(notwithstanding minor differences)
Functional assays
• Use in vitro and/or in vivo analysis
Animal studies plus toxicity studies
• Can be used to support safety (this is good to do if there are still
uncertainties about the product)
Available from: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/DrugsGuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM291128.pdf
&http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM397017.pdf, 8/5/16
11. Pre-clinical study-Data analysis
Acceptance range of biosimilarity to reference
product: 80-125% similar (90% CI for PK and
PD), scientifically justify use of other ranges
•Similar PK/PD data assumes lower risk of clinical
differences (total evidence demonstrate
biosimilarity)
Choice of primary endpoints (ie. PK—AUC,
Cmax; PD—AUEC)
| New biosimilar regulations | Yury Viknevich | 8/10/16| Novartis | Business Use Only
Available from:
http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/HowDrugsareDevelopedandApproved/ApprovalApplications/TherapeuticBiologicAp
plications/Biosimilars/UCM428732.pdf & http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM397017.pdf,
8/3/16
12. Pre-clinical study-Data analysis
Evaluation of residual uncertainty (pharmacology
data: pre-clinical)
• The FDA collects data in a step-wise fashion and considers the totality of
the evidence (use of risk-based approach) additional data based on
residual uncertainty
Analytic quality and similarity
• Analytic characterization between product and reference product using
meaningful fingerprint-like analysis algorithm
Safety and immunogenicity studies
| New biosimilar regulations | Yury Viknevich | 8/10/16| Novartis | Business Use Only
12
Available from:
http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM397017.pdf, 8/5/16
13. Pre-clinical study-Biological
variability
| New biosimilar regulations | Yury Viknevich | 8/10/16| Novartis | Business Use Only
13
Inherent variability of the biologic system and the
manufacturing process OR microheterogeneity
•Small variability
Available from:
http://www.fda.gov/downloads/DrugsGuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM291128.pdf, 8/3/16
14. Pre-clinical study-Extrapolation
Potential to be approved for one or more conditions
based on reference product (based on sufficient
scientific justification)
•The MoA(s) in each condition of use for which
licensure is sought
•PK and bio-distribution of the product in different
patient populations
•Immunogenicity of the product in different patient
populations
•Differences in toxicities in each condition of use and
patient population
| New biosimilar regulations | Yury Viknevich | 8/10/16| Novartis | Business Use Only
Available from:
http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/HowDrugsareDevelopedandApproved/ApprovalApplications/TherapeuticBiologicApplicati
ons/Biosimilars/UCM428732.pdf & http://www.fda.gov/downloads/DrugsGuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM291128.pdf, 8/3/16
15. Clinical development
of biosimilars
| New biosimilar regulations | Yury Viknevich | 8/10/16| Novartis | Business Use Only15
Accessed from: http://www.amgenbiosimilars.com/the-science/clinical-trial-design/, 8/3/16
16. Clinical trial design
| New biosimilar regulations | Yury Viknevich | 8/10/16| Novartis | Business Use Only
Clinical studies
•To show no clinical meaningful difference between the
product and the reference product in terms of purity,
safety, and potency (ex. Zarxio)
•To confirm similarity to reference product
Two phases of clinical studies are required – Phase I
and Phase III study (multiple studies per phase)
•At least 1 clinical study that includes a comparison of
the immunogenicity of the proposed reference product
Available from:
http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/HowDrugsareDevelopedandApproved/ApprovalApplications/TherapeuticBiologicApplications/Biosimilars/UCM4
28732.pdf & http://www.fda.gov/downloads/DrugsGuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM291128.pdf, 8/4/16
17. Clinical trial design
Two types of particular relevance:
• Crossover design (generally preferred for PK similarity):
recommended for a product with a short half-life, a rapid PD
response, and a low incidence of immunogenicity. Issue with time
course of appearance and disappearance of immunogenicity and its
relation to the washout period.
• Parallel design: recommended for products with a long half-life or for
which repeated exposure can lead to an increased immune
response. Also, appropriate for diseases that exhibit time-related
changes associated with exposure to the drug.
| New biosimilar regulations | Yury Viknevich | 8/10/16| Novartis | Business Use Only
17
Available from: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM397017.pdf, 8/5/16
18. Clinical trial design
Study population: an adequately sensitive
population to detect any differences
PK and PD measure: reflect the effect(s) of the
drug
• PK sampling: frequent at early stages with decreased frequency
later
• PD sampling: variable
Route of administration: all routes vs. a single
route
| New biosimilar regulations | Yury Viknevich | 8/10/16| Novartis | Business Use Only
18
Available from:
http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/HowDrugsareDevelopedandApproved/ApprovalApplications/TherapeuticBiologicApplications/Biosimilars/UC
M428732.pdf & http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM397017.pdf, 8/4/16
19. Pharmacovigilance (post-marketing)
| New biosimilar regulations | Yury Viknevich | 8/10/16| Novartis | Business Use Only
19
Fundamentally important to monitor safety issues
that are specific to a manufacturer
•A robust program is essential to help ensure patient
safety
Safety monitoring should also have adequate
mechanisms in place to differentiate between the
adverse events with the biosimilar and the
reference product
Available from: https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2015/08/28/2015-21382/designation-of-official-names-and-proper-names-for-certain-biological-products &
http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM493439.pdf, 8/4/16
20. FDA guidances-Labeling
| New biosimilar regulations | Yury Viknevich | 8/10/16| Novartis | Business Use Only20
Labeling should be specific to the conditions of
use, dosing regimen(s), and language previously
approved for the reference product
If fewer conditions are approved than the
reference product, certain text would be used
•Exception: sometimes information that the
product is not approved for, but the reference
product is, can be used. This is in order to
ensure safe use
Available from: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/guidancecomplianceregulatoryinformation/guidances/ucm493439.pdf, 8/3/16
21. FDA guidances-Labeling
21
Unique labeling:
•Incorporate “Biosimilarity Statement” describing
relationship to the reference product (under initial
US approval)
•Recommended to incorporate relevant data and
information from the FDA-approved labeling for
the reference product plus any appropriate
modifications specific to the product (NO
comparative data)
Available from: http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/NewsEvents/ucm493240.htm & https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/fda/fdaDrugXsl.cfm?setid=fe707775-a0ae-41b5-a744-
28c41889fce8&type=display &http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM493439.pdf. 8/3/16
| New biosimilar regulations | Yury Viknevich | 8/10/16| Novartis | Business Use Only
22. FDA guidances-Labeling
22
Under 21 CFR 201.56(c)(1), biosimilar product
labeling must meet the content and format
requirements of the physician labeling rule (PLR)
as described in 21 CFR 201.56(d) and 201.57
Biosimilar must meet the content and format
requirements of the pregnancy and lactation
labeling final rule (PLLR) as described in 21 CFR
201.57(c)(9)(i) through (iii)
Available from: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM493439.pdf. 8/3/16
| New biosimilar regulations | Yury Viknevich | 8/10/16| Novartis | Business Use Only
23. FDA guidances-Labeling
| New biosimilar regulations | Yury Viknevich | 8/10/16| Novartis | Business Use Only
23
Statement:
•As with all therapeutic proteins, there is potential for
immunogenicity
Available from: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM493439.pdf &
http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2015/125553lbl.pdf, 8/3/16
24. FDA guidances-Naming
| New biosimilar regulations | Yury Viknevich | 8/10/16| Novartis | Business Use Only
24
Unique naming:
•Core name (adopted by USAN) proper name (from
public health service (PHS) act and 600.3(k))
•Suffix of four lowercase letters will be attached with
a hyphen, unique, and devoid of meaning (ex.
Filgrastim-sndz)
- Will help products being grouped together in electronic
databases and distinguish them from the reference
product
Available from: https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2015/08/28/2015-21382/designation-of-official-names-and-proper-names-for-certain-biological-products &
http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM493439.pdf, 8/3/16
25. FDA guidances-Naming
25
Suffix (should not):
•Be promotional
•Include abbreviations commonly used in clinical
practice
•Contain or suggest any drug substance name or
core name designated by the USAN council
•Look similar to or be mistaken for the name of a
currently marketed product
•Be too similar to any other product’s suffix
Available from: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/guidancecomplianceregulatoryinformation/guidances/ucm459987.pdf, 8/3/16
| New biosimilar regulations | Yury Viknevich | 8/10/16| Novartis | Business Use Only
26. FDA guidances-Naming
26
Using the biosimilar name:
•The information described is specific to the product
•Directive statements and recommendations
(preventing, monitoring, managing, or mitigating
risks)
Available from: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM493439.pdf &
https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/fda/fdaDrugXsl.cfm?setid=fe707775-a0ae-41b5-a744-28c41889fce8&type=display, 8/3/16
| New biosimilar regulations | Yury Viknevich | 8/10/16| Novartis | Business Use Only
27. Reference product labeling Biosimilar product labeling
Treatment with JUNEXANT
increases the risk of serious
infections involving various
organ systems and sites that
may lead to hospitalization or
death.
Treatment with replicamab
products increases the risk of
serious infections involving
various organ systems and
sites that may lead to
hospitalization or death.Available from:
http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM493439.pdf, 8/4/16
| New biosimilar regulations | Yury Viknevich | 8/10/16| Novartis | Business Use Only
FDA guidances-Naming
Using the core name:
•Overall risk-benefit profile of the reference product is
relevant to the biosimilar
•Risk applies to both products: use the core name followed
by “products”
28. FDA guidances-Naming
28
Reasons:
•The proper name of a biological product reflects
certain scientific characteristics of the product, such
as chemical structure and pharmacological
properties
•Proper name of a biological product helps health
care providers identify the product's drug substance
and distinguish biological products from one another
Available from: https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2015/08/28/2015-21382/designation-of-official-names-and-proper-names-for-certain-biological-products, 8/4/16
| New biosimilar regulations | Yury Viknevich | 8/10/16| Novartis | Business Use Only
29. FDA guidances-Naming
29
Reasons (retrospectively):
• Prevent a patient from receiving the wrong product
• Facilitate manufacturer-specific pharmacovigilance
• Encourage routine use of designated suffixes in ordering,
prescribing, dispensing, and recordkeeping
• Advance accurate perceptions of biological products
Available from: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/guidancecomplianceregulatoryinformation/guidances/ucm459987.pdf, 8/4/16
| New biosimilar regulations | Yury Viknevich | 8/10/16| Novartis | Business Use Only
30. Biosimilars in the pipeline: Sandoz
30
Project in filing chart Current phase Indications
Pegfilgrastim LA-
EP2006
Submitted (EU and US) Chemotherapy-induced
neutropenia, etc
Adalimumab GP2017 III Arthritidies, plaque
psoriasis and others
Etanercept GP2015 Submitted (EU and US) Arthritidies, plaque
psoriasis and others
Rituximab GP2013 III FL, II RA, III RA Lymphoma, chronic
lymphocytic leukemia,
RA
Epoetin-alfa HX575 III CKD, chemo induced
anemia, etc
Infliximab GP 1111 III Autoimmune diseases,
etc
Available from: http://www.sandoz-biosimilars.com/en/clinicaltrials/sandoz-clinical-trials.shtml, 8/5/16
| New biosimilar regulations | Yury Viknevich | 8/10/16| Novartis | Business Use Only
31. News: updates with biosimilars
31
| New biosimilar regulations | Yury Viknevich | 8/10/16| Novartis | Business Use Only
32. CVS health
32
Will remove 35 medications from 2017 formulary
• Lantus (insulin glargine)
• Neupogen (filgrastim)
Replace with biosimilars: Reduced drug costs (typically
10 – 15% cheaper than originator product)
• Basaglar (insulin glargine)
- Approved 2015
• Zarxio (filgrastim-sndz)
Available from: http://www.firstwordpharma.com/node/1404858#axzz4GO4IA4Jj & http://diatribe.org/fda-approves-new-insulin-glargine-basaglar-first-biosimilar-insulin-us, 8/5/16
| New biosimilar regulations | Yury Viknevich | 8/10/16| Novartis | Business Use Only