The document summarizes changes made to a research manuscript on the effects of parental expectations on grade 12 STEM students. It notes changes to the title, replacement of the "Parents and Students' Awareness Program" output with "Informative Pamphlet", and addition of an ethical consideration section. It also discusses revisions made to survey questionnaires. The summary provides an overview of the key edits and modifications made to the manuscript.

1. CHANGES IN THE MANUSCRIPT
1. TITLE
From “Effects of Parental expectation among the Grade 12 STEM
students’ Academic performance” To “Effects of Parental Expectation
towards the Grade 12 STEM students”.
2. CONCEPTUAL PARADIGM
The Output section “Parents and Students’ Awareness Program” was
changed and became “Informative Pamphlet”
3. ADDING ETHICAL CONSIDERATION IN CHAPTER III
4. SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRES

2. “EFFECTS OF PARENTAL EXPECTATIONS
TOWARDS THE GRADE 12 STEM
STUDENTS”
ADVISER: MRS. MELANIE L. MOREJON
GRADE: 12 STEM SECTION: HDF
SCHOOL: GMTISAT
GROUP 1
CARABIDO J., PAISON C. J., MORADA J., OLEA J., and DEVIDA J. J.

3. • Parental expectation is sometimes good but often affects the
child's individuality and affects academic performance. Deb et
al., (2020).
• Parental expectations have been found to play a critical role in
children's academic success. Yamamoto and Holloway (2010).
• Parents’ participation plays an important role in children’s
academic achievement, cognitive, social, and emotional
development. The Philippine Social Context (2018).
The Problem and its background

4. • The future of a child is the biggest concern to a parent. Rogayan
et al., (2021).
• If parents set unrealistic expectations for their children, it tends
to have a negative effect on their performances due to too much
pressure their parents put on them. Carly Seifart (2017).
• This study is anchored with the REPUBLIC ACT NO. 11908,
otherwise known as "The Parent Effectiveness Service
Program Act of 2022"
The Problem and its background

5. 1. Level of Parental Expectation
2. Effect of Parental Expectations towards the Grade 12 STEM
Students in terms of their (Mental, Physical, and Emotional
health as well as the Academic performance).
3. Strategies employed by the STEM students to overcome those
expectations in terms of their (Mental, Physical, and
Emotional health as well as the Academic performance).
4. What programs can be proposed
Statement of the Problem

6. To understand the clear flow of the present study the Conceptual
Paradigm of the study is shown below;
A. Development and
validation of Survey
questionnaires.
B. Administering and
distribution of survey
questionnaires.
C. Organization of the
responses
D. Statistical analysis of
data
1. Level of parental
expectation
2. Effect of parental
expectation to the
(Mental, Physical, and
Emotional health as well
as well the Academic
performance) of the
Grade 12 STEM
students.
3. Strategies employed by
the STEM students
“Informative
Pamphlet”
INPUT OUTPUT
PROCESS
Conceptual Paradigm

7. LEVEL OF PARENTAL EXPECTATION
TOWARDS THE GR.12 STEM STUDENTS WAM VD
I expect my child to…
1. always answer in class recitation 3.35 VHE
2. pass his/her assignments on time 3.75 VHE
3. have a high grade on his/her major subjects 3.40 VHE
4. compete for the highest honors at school 2.55 HE
5. do not slack off on his/her studies 3.55 VHE
6. get the highest score in his/her quizzes and
exams 3.20 HE
7. overcome his/her weaknesses in his/her
studies 3.55 VHE
8. receive academic distinctions 3.15 HE
9. be a leader in class activities and projects 2.80 HE
10. always be active in classes 3.70 VHE
Overall WAM 3.30 VHE
Table 4 Weighted
Mean on the Level of
Parental expectation
towards the Grade 12
STEM students
LEGEND:
Range Interval Verbal Description
3.26 – 4.00 (VHE) Very High Expectation
2.51 – 3.25 (HE) High Expectation
1.76 – 2.50 (LE) Low Expectation
1.00 – 1.75 (NE) No Expectation

8. EFFECTS OF PARENTAL EXPECTATION
AMONG GRADE 12 STEM STUDENTS WAM VD
A. Mental Health
Negative 2.85 M
Positive 2.88 M
Overall WAM 2.86 M
B. Physical health
Negative 2.37 L
Positive 2.43 L
Overall WAM 2.40 L
C. Emotional health
Negative 2.61 M
Positive 2.74 M
Overall WAM 2.67 M
D. Academic performance
Negative 1.91 L
Positive 2.72 M
Overall WAM 2.32 L
Overall WAM of Negative Effect 2.43 L
Overall WAM of Positive Effect 2.69 M
Table 9 Summation
of generalized
acquitted weighted
arithmetic mean on
the Effect of Parental
expectation towards
the Grade 12 STEM
students’ (Mental,
Physical, Emotional
health and Academic
performance)
LEGEND:
Range Interval Verbal Description
3.26 – 4.00 (H) High
2.51 – 3.25 (M) Moderate
1.76 – 2.50 (L) Low
1.00 – 1.75 (N) Never

9. STRATEGIES EMPLOYED BY THE GR.12 STEM STUDENTS WAM VD
A. Mental health 2.54 F
B. Physical health 2.71 F
C. Emotional health 3.06 F
D. Academic performance 2.96 F
Overall WAM 2.81 F
LEGEND:
Range Interval Verbal Description
3.26 – 4.00 (A) Always
2.51 – 3.25 (F) Frequent
1.76 – 2.50 (S) Seldom
1.00 – 1.75 (N) Never
Table 11 Summation of the generalized acquitted weighted arithmetic mean on the strategies
employed by the Grade 12 STEM students to overcome their parent’s expectation.

10.  Level of Parental Expectation
1.1 It was found out that Parents hold a very high expectations
on the Grade 12 STEM students.
CONCLUSION
 Effects of Parental Expectation
2.1-2.4 Parental expectation was found out to have a greater
significant positive effect in terms of the Grade 12 STEM
students’ (A. mental, B. physical, and C. emotional health,
as well as their D. academic performance.)

11. What are the strategies employed by the Grade 12 STEM
Students to overcome their Parents’ Expectations
3.1-3.4 It was found out that Grade 12 STEM students
frequently employ the given strategies to overcome their
parent’s expectations that the researchers then can
contemplate and probe for them to offer a suitable
program.

12. Presented by Group 1
Carabido, Jericho B.
Paison, Christine Joy G.
Olea, Jaybe M
Devida, Jose Jay R.
Morada, Jojo Jr. M.
Presented to:
Mrs. Melanie Morejon
&
The Respected Panelists
Partial fulfillment of the Requirements in
Practical Research II