SAVE FOOD: Global Initiative for Food Loss and Waste Reduction 
Jorge M. Fonseca
870 million people in hunger 
9.1 billion to be fed in 2050 
Natural disasters increasing 3x since 1980 
Resources for food production diminishing 
Urban population increasing rapidly 
“Zero Hunger Challenge” 
Food Security? Economics? Sustainability?
Global Initiative on Food Losses and Waste Reduction 
FAO & Messe Düsseldorf 
established Save Food in May 
2011 in Düsseldorf at 
Interpack 2011
Commissioned FAO work attracted worldwide attention 
Food losses and waste by world region 
0% 
10% 
20% 
30% 
40% 
50% 
60% 
cereals 
roots & 
tubers 
oilseeds & 
pulses 
fruits & 
vegetables 
meat 
fish & 
seafood 
dairy 
products 
Consumption 
Distribution 
Processing 
Postharvest 
Agriculture
Global Initiative on Food Losses and Waste Reduction 
1Awareness raising on the impact of, and solutions for food loss and waste. 
2Collaboration and coordination of world-wide initiatives on food loss and waste reduction. 
3Policy, strategy and programme development for food loss and waste reduction. 
4Support to investment programmes and projects, implemented by private and public sectors. 
The basic pillars of Save Food 
Holistic, Integrated FSC and food system approach!
A new strategy: development of standard methodology 
Standard Methodology 
-The four “S” approach 
-Identification of ‘Critical Loss Points’ based on disaggregated data 
Initial Case Studies in the Field: Kenya, Indonesia 
Policy, strategy and programme development for food loss and waste reduction – some progress in the 2012-13
FAO methodology being tested worldwide 
•Case studies in Kenya confirmed losses and dynamic of quality in local market 
•Data shows quality defects of bananas at wholesaler, and the eventual quantitative losses (later in the supply chain) 
Qualitative losses % 
Quantitative losses % 
Over- ripening 
20 
3 
Physical damages 
70 
8-10 
Crown rot 
>15 
5-10 (loose finger) 
Thrips 
30 
0 (no evidence) 
Total 
70-9? 
10-12
Food Product Groups 
Food 
Food consumed 
Non-food parts 
Food loss 
Animal feed 
Biomass 
Incineration 
Disposal 
Food Animal Plants 
Non-food parts
Disaggregating food losses 
Qualitative Losses 
Food Waste 
Quantitative Losses 
Animal feed or biomass 
Incineration or disposal 
Low quality food consumed 
Low quality food lost
Global Initiative on Food Losses and Waste Reduction 
Synergy in the fight against food waste: 
•UNEP – Think-Eat-Save 
•EU Consortium ‘FUSIONS’ (food waste in Europe) 
•OECD (policy development) 
•Global FoodBanking Network (GFN) 
•Federation of European Food Banks (FEBA) 
•‘Food for the Cities’ programme 
•Local Governments for Sustainability (ICLEI) 
•Alliance Against Hunger and Malnutrition (AAHM) 
•International Federation of Red Cross/Crescent Societies (IFRC) 
•National initiatives in the UK, Denmark, Sweden, France, The Netherlands, USA, Canada, Japan, Portugal, Brazil, South Africa
Global Initiative on Food Losses and Waste Reduction
INTERNATIONAL EFFORTS FAO REGIONAL OFFICES 
Food loss reduction picked up momentum
ASIA & THE PACIFIC Strategy toward awareness raising and capacity building 
•FOSTERING AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT 
•COPING WITH THE IMPACT OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON AGRICULTURE AND FOOD AND NUTRITIONAL SECURITY
EASTERN EUROPE & CENTRAL ASIA Strategy differentiated among countries Awareness raising, data collection and sustainability focus 
•PART OF THE REGION FOCUS ON AWARENESS RAINING AND EDUCATION 
•LESS DEVELOPED AREAS TO ADDRESS GAPS IN AVAILABILITY OF DATA 
•EMPHASIS ON FLW REDUCTION TO REDUCE PRESSURE ON SCARCE NATURAL RESOURCES
SUBSAHARA AFRICA Strategy directed to enabling environment for productivity and competitiveness (value chain development) 
•INCREASE AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY AND DIVERSIFICATION 
•SUPPORT MARKET ACCES AND SANITARY MEASURES FOR BETTER TRADE
NEAR EAST AND NORTH AFRICA Strategy: Developing evidence for Policy and Strategy Making Integrated approach with all Save Food Pillars approach 
•ENHANCING FOOD SECURITY AND NUTRITION 
•FOSTERING AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT FOR IMPROVED LIVELIHOODS (Through more commercialization)
WORKPLAN UMBRELLA PROG. 
SYSTEMS AND METHDOLOGIES (O1) CAUSES (02) IMPACT OF FLW (O3) SOLUTION STUDIES (O4) 
RESEARCH 
POLICY STRATEGY INVESTMENT PROGRAMME 
AWARENESS RAISING 
MATERIALS FOR OUTREACH (O5) CAMPAIGNS (06) 
PARTNERSHIPS ON INITIATIVES 
COORD. EFFORTS (O7) 
BRIEFS AND GUIDANCE (O8) 
NAT. & REG. STRATEGIES (09)
Umbrella program of SAVE FOOD: Losses and waste addressed differently, e.g.: 
Food Losses 
•More information needed on «hot spots» where the highest impact for reduction can be made 
•Training can play a mayor role; significant benefits from P/P partnerships 
•Different food commodities carry different challenges; also location 
Food Waste 
•Awareness may play an important factor 
•Integrated policies to promote donations and environmental protection appear to help 
•Regulation of labeling; support to sustainable «life cycle of food» can add to effort
FOOD LOSS REDUCTION 
This generation challenge! With more pressure than others that failed to make a difference

Fao. jorge fonseca save food

  • 1.
    SAVE FOOD: GlobalInitiative for Food Loss and Waste Reduction Jorge M. Fonseca
  • 2.
    870 million peoplein hunger 9.1 billion to be fed in 2050 Natural disasters increasing 3x since 1980 Resources for food production diminishing Urban population increasing rapidly “Zero Hunger Challenge” Food Security? Economics? Sustainability?
  • 3.
    Global Initiative onFood Losses and Waste Reduction FAO & Messe Düsseldorf established Save Food in May 2011 in Düsseldorf at Interpack 2011
  • 4.
    Commissioned FAO workattracted worldwide attention Food losses and waste by world region 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% cereals roots & tubers oilseeds & pulses fruits & vegetables meat fish & seafood dairy products Consumption Distribution Processing Postharvest Agriculture
  • 5.
    Global Initiative onFood Losses and Waste Reduction 1Awareness raising on the impact of, and solutions for food loss and waste. 2Collaboration and coordination of world-wide initiatives on food loss and waste reduction. 3Policy, strategy and programme development for food loss and waste reduction. 4Support to investment programmes and projects, implemented by private and public sectors. The basic pillars of Save Food Holistic, Integrated FSC and food system approach!
  • 6.
    A new strategy:development of standard methodology Standard Methodology -The four “S” approach -Identification of ‘Critical Loss Points’ based on disaggregated data Initial Case Studies in the Field: Kenya, Indonesia Policy, strategy and programme development for food loss and waste reduction – some progress in the 2012-13
  • 7.
    FAO methodology beingtested worldwide •Case studies in Kenya confirmed losses and dynamic of quality in local market •Data shows quality defects of bananas at wholesaler, and the eventual quantitative losses (later in the supply chain) Qualitative losses % Quantitative losses % Over- ripening 20 3 Physical damages 70 8-10 Crown rot >15 5-10 (loose finger) Thrips 30 0 (no evidence) Total 70-9? 10-12
  • 8.
    Food Product Groups Food Food consumed Non-food parts Food loss Animal feed Biomass Incineration Disposal Food Animal Plants Non-food parts
  • 9.
    Disaggregating food losses Qualitative Losses Food Waste Quantitative Losses Animal feed or biomass Incineration or disposal Low quality food consumed Low quality food lost
  • 10.
    Global Initiative onFood Losses and Waste Reduction Synergy in the fight against food waste: •UNEP – Think-Eat-Save •EU Consortium ‘FUSIONS’ (food waste in Europe) •OECD (policy development) •Global FoodBanking Network (GFN) •Federation of European Food Banks (FEBA) •‘Food for the Cities’ programme •Local Governments for Sustainability (ICLEI) •Alliance Against Hunger and Malnutrition (AAHM) •International Federation of Red Cross/Crescent Societies (IFRC) •National initiatives in the UK, Denmark, Sweden, France, The Netherlands, USA, Canada, Japan, Portugal, Brazil, South Africa
  • 11.
    Global Initiative onFood Losses and Waste Reduction
  • 12.
    INTERNATIONAL EFFORTS FAOREGIONAL OFFICES Food loss reduction picked up momentum
  • 13.
    ASIA & THEPACIFIC Strategy toward awareness raising and capacity building •FOSTERING AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT •COPING WITH THE IMPACT OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON AGRICULTURE AND FOOD AND NUTRITIONAL SECURITY
  • 17.
    EASTERN EUROPE &CENTRAL ASIA Strategy differentiated among countries Awareness raising, data collection and sustainability focus •PART OF THE REGION FOCUS ON AWARENESS RAINING AND EDUCATION •LESS DEVELOPED AREAS TO ADDRESS GAPS IN AVAILABILITY OF DATA •EMPHASIS ON FLW REDUCTION TO REDUCE PRESSURE ON SCARCE NATURAL RESOURCES
  • 19.
    SUBSAHARA AFRICA Strategydirected to enabling environment for productivity and competitiveness (value chain development) •INCREASE AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY AND DIVERSIFICATION •SUPPORT MARKET ACCES AND SANITARY MEASURES FOR BETTER TRADE
  • 22.
    NEAR EAST ANDNORTH AFRICA Strategy: Developing evidence for Policy and Strategy Making Integrated approach with all Save Food Pillars approach •ENHANCING FOOD SECURITY AND NUTRITION •FOSTERING AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT FOR IMPROVED LIVELIHOODS (Through more commercialization)
  • 25.
    WORKPLAN UMBRELLA PROG. SYSTEMS AND METHDOLOGIES (O1) CAUSES (02) IMPACT OF FLW (O3) SOLUTION STUDIES (O4) RESEARCH POLICY STRATEGY INVESTMENT PROGRAMME AWARENESS RAISING MATERIALS FOR OUTREACH (O5) CAMPAIGNS (06) PARTNERSHIPS ON INITIATIVES COORD. EFFORTS (O7) BRIEFS AND GUIDANCE (O8) NAT. & REG. STRATEGIES (09)
  • 26.
    Umbrella program ofSAVE FOOD: Losses and waste addressed differently, e.g.: Food Losses •More information needed on «hot spots» where the highest impact for reduction can be made •Training can play a mayor role; significant benefits from P/P partnerships •Different food commodities carry different challenges; also location Food Waste •Awareness may play an important factor •Integrated policies to promote donations and environmental protection appear to help •Regulation of labeling; support to sustainable «life cycle of food» can add to effort
  • 27.
    FOOD LOSS REDUCTION This generation challenge! With more pressure than others that failed to make a difference