Fact case format
•
1 like•530 views
This document provides a template for constructing a fact case debate argument. It outlines an introductory section where the debater states the topic, their position, and how they will interpret the topic. The resolutional analysis section specifies using a preponderance of evidence criterion. Three contentions then provide examples to support the resolution and specifically link each example back to how it relates to the resolution.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Govt case construction fact
This document provides an outline for constructing a government case in a debate that supports a given resolution as a fact. The case includes introductory remarks stating support for the resolution as a fact and interpreting the topic, followed by a criterion. It then lists three contentions providing examples to support the resolution and specifically linking each example. The case concludes with final closing remarks reaffirming support for the resolution as a fact.
Parli Debate Topics
Topics for debates are usually announced 20 minutes before the debate begins and can range from being clear and straightforward to vague and obscure. It is up to the government team to provide an interpretation of the topic, which could be as vague as "This House should fix the locks" and open to metaphorical interpretation if not about actual locks. Topics are generally interpreted as a claim of fact, value, or policy and vary between tournaments, with most including current event topics and one metaphor, though some use insignificant topics like "dogs are better than cats."
Club for Online Business Introduction
The Club for Online Business is a network of college students interested in learning about online business through conducting interviews. It was established in 2016 by Professor Eric Robertson to produce unique educational content and teach interview skills. The club aims to build resumes, develop communication skills, collaborate as a team, create content through interviews, and understand technology needed for interviews. Meetings are typically weekly and involve setting up, conducting, or discussing interviews and marketing strategies. A four week cycle includes planning interviews, prepping questions, conducting interviews, and marketing strategies. The club follows roles of President, Secretary, Treasurer, and Club Rep as required and also hosts, marketing, website managers, podcast producers, and outreach specialists. Business cards and website use
Kritik english as debate language
The document presents an English Only Kritik arguing that requiring debates to be conducted solely in English marginalizes non-English speakers and destroys cultural identity. It claims that debate formats systematically discriminate against those who do not speak English by not allowing for translators. The document provides background on the link between language and identity and argues the judge should vote for the opposition team to punish the government for complying with discriminatory norms.
Opportunity cost t
The document proposes a framework to argue that the government team's definition of the resolution marginalizes certain groups and privileges others, without directly making a topicality claim. It suggests explaining how the marginalized group is important and needs representation, and how focusing only on the mainstream interpretation perpetuates their discrimination. The framework treats the impacts of topic choice as pre-fiat harms occurring in the round.
Trichotomy of debate
The document outlines a common debate argument known as a "trichotomy of debate" argument, which claims that resolutions can be interpreted as facts, values, or policies, and the government team interpreted the resolution incorrectly. This violates debate norms and prevents the opposition from adequately preparing their case. The summary argues the government team should lose because this foundational interpretive issue makes it impossible for the opposition to debate effectively.
Topicality drills
This document outlines various debate topics and cases that could be constructed on those topics. It includes sample debate topics on investigating Bush-era interrogation abuses, reforming healthcare, preparing for swine flu, decreasing misinformation, transitioning to alternative vehicle fuels, stopping poppy production in Afghanistan, opinions on socialism and town hall meetings, the cap and trade system, nutrition education, use of military power versus negotiations, and presidential line-item veto power. Sample plans or arguments are provided for some of the topics.
Solvency gap
A. This position should be taken when the government proposes a large plan without specifying the implementation timeframe or stating it will be implemented immediately.
B. It argues that immediately removing the current system without adequate preparation time will exacerbate existing problems.
C. It asserts the plan is meant to address a problem that is somewhat under control currently but circumstances will be vastly different and worse during the transition period due to inadequacies in the new system before it is fully implemented.
D. It discusses how all the original problems the plan aimed to address will become much worse if implemented immediately without proper setup.
Recommended
Govt case construction fact
This document provides an outline for constructing a government case in a debate that supports a given resolution as a fact. The case includes introductory remarks stating support for the resolution as a fact and interpreting the topic, followed by a criterion. It then lists three contentions providing examples to support the resolution and specifically linking each example. The case concludes with final closing remarks reaffirming support for the resolution as a fact.
Parli Debate Topics
Topics for debates are usually announced 20 minutes before the debate begins and can range from being clear and straightforward to vague and obscure. It is up to the government team to provide an interpretation of the topic, which could be as vague as "This House should fix the locks" and open to metaphorical interpretation if not about actual locks. Topics are generally interpreted as a claim of fact, value, or policy and vary between tournaments, with most including current event topics and one metaphor, though some use insignificant topics like "dogs are better than cats."
Club for Online Business Introduction
The Club for Online Business is a network of college students interested in learning about online business through conducting interviews. It was established in 2016 by Professor Eric Robertson to produce unique educational content and teach interview skills. The club aims to build resumes, develop communication skills, collaborate as a team, create content through interviews, and understand technology needed for interviews. Meetings are typically weekly and involve setting up, conducting, or discussing interviews and marketing strategies. A four week cycle includes planning interviews, prepping questions, conducting interviews, and marketing strategies. The club follows roles of President, Secretary, Treasurer, and Club Rep as required and also hosts, marketing, website managers, podcast producers, and outreach specialists. Business cards and website use
Kritik english as debate language
The document presents an English Only Kritik arguing that requiring debates to be conducted solely in English marginalizes non-English speakers and destroys cultural identity. It claims that debate formats systematically discriminate against those who do not speak English by not allowing for translators. The document provides background on the link between language and identity and argues the judge should vote for the opposition team to punish the government for complying with discriminatory norms.
Opportunity cost t
The document proposes a framework to argue that the government team's definition of the resolution marginalizes certain groups and privileges others, without directly making a topicality claim. It suggests explaining how the marginalized group is important and needs representation, and how focusing only on the mainstream interpretation perpetuates their discrimination. The framework treats the impacts of topic choice as pre-fiat harms occurring in the round.
Trichotomy of debate
The document outlines a common debate argument known as a "trichotomy of debate" argument, which claims that resolutions can be interpreted as facts, values, or policies, and the government team interpreted the resolution incorrectly. This violates debate norms and prevents the opposition from adequately preparing their case. The summary argues the government team should lose because this foundational interpretive issue makes it impossible for the opposition to debate effectively.
Topicality drills
This document outlines various debate topics and cases that could be constructed on those topics. It includes sample debate topics on investigating Bush-era interrogation abuses, reforming healthcare, preparing for swine flu, decreasing misinformation, transitioning to alternative vehicle fuels, stopping poppy production in Afghanistan, opinions on socialism and town hall meetings, the cap and trade system, nutrition education, use of military power versus negotiations, and presidential line-item veto power. Sample plans or arguments are provided for some of the topics.
Solvency gap
A. This position should be taken when the government proposes a large plan without specifying the implementation timeframe or stating it will be implemented immediately.
B. It argues that immediately removing the current system without adequate preparation time will exacerbate existing problems.
C. It asserts the plan is meant to address a problem that is somewhat under control currently but circumstances will be vastly different and worse during the transition period due to inadequacies in the new system before it is fully implemented.
D. It discusses how all the original problems the plan aimed to address will become much worse if implemented immediately without proper setup.
Random drills
The document describes various debate scenarios or "random drills" involving different situations that may occur in a debate round and requests discussion on how to respond. It provides prompts for how to handle issues like the opposition not engaging your strategy, multiple counterplans being run, dealing with a perceived false fact, a plan not aligning with the resolution definitions, a delay counterplan being called topical, vagueness in a standard of ground presentation, saving an important dropped disad, responding when only harms are discussed without advantages, and weighing a pre-fiat position victory against advantages victory. It also includes a resolution interpretation prompt and requests on turning countercontentions into disads and a tricot argument.
Pre fiat impacts
This document discusses pre-fiat impacts and how examining them differs from examining fiat impacts. Pre-fiat impacts are the possible effects that could occur if a policy or plan was enacted without the fiat assumption, while fiat impacts examine the effects assuming the plan is passed by fiat. Some examples of pre-fiat impacts mentioned are giving voice to marginalized groups, promoting better debate, and allowing new ways of thinking about issues. The document encourages thinking of additional pre-fiat impacts and re-examining past debate cases to develop pre-fiat impacts from the government side.
Policy as value
The document discusses using a "policy as value" debate technique where one argues that a policy position reflects certain values or principles. It suggests setting up a framework for using this technique by outlining the values a policy would uphold. The document also provides examples of using this for debates about legalizing a certain issue or reforming health care.
Solvency press and fiat abuse
This document provides guidance on debate techniques for day 3 of Debate Camp. It outlines two steps to take when critiquing an opponent's plan: 1) Illustrate how the plan does not solve the problems it aims to solve through reasoning or examples, and 2) Revisit the harms being addressed and discuss how each problem gets worse due to the plan's impact. It then provides examples of debate topics and potential plans with issues that could be exploited, such as plans relying on actions by entities outside the resolution or making implausible causal claims. Types of potential fiat abuse are also listed, such as multi-step plans or those relying on multi-actor cooperation.
Topicality overview
Topicality ensures debates focus on the agreed upon resolution and prevents teams from arguing unrelated topics. It protects the opposition from having to respond to arguments outside the scope of the debate by clarifying what issues teams should address. Topicality is assessed based on whether arguments align with the resolution and remain on the agreed upon topic of discussion.
Opp strategies overview
This document discusses various argument strategies that can be used in a debate for different types of topics including topicality arguments, refutations, disadvantages, counterplans, kritiks, and vagueness arguments. It suggests tailoring the arguments to the specific topic being debated and addressing potential counter-arguments.
Policy case overview
Policy case formats typically involve either a Toulmin or IRAC structure. The Toulmin structure presents a claim, grounds or evidence for the claim, and a warrant or justification. The IRAC structure involves an issue, rule, analysis applying the rule to relevant facts, and a conclusion. While these are common, an advocate can develop their own format as long as it clearly presents the relevant elements of a strong policy argument.
Govt case construction comparative advantages
The document outlines the typical structure and components of a government policy case in comparative advantage format. It includes sections for background on the current situation, details of the proposed plan like what it will do, who will enact it, and how it will be enforced and funded. Each advantage then follows the structure of discussing the status quo, linking it to a current issue, explaining how the plan solves it, and the importance and impacts of doing so.
Govt case const policy stock issues
This document outlines the standard format for constructing a government policy case in debate. It includes sections for discussing the harm, inherency of the problem, plan text describing the solution, agency responsible, mandate and enforcement of the plan, funding, solvency analysis showing how the plan solves the problem, advantages, and linking the plan's impacts to the issues being debated. The overall goal is for the government team to introduce a harm, prove it will continue without intervention, and then show how their proposed plan solves the problem.
Creating a govt case overview
The document outlines the steps to create a government case: identify the type of claim or issue, interpret the topic by analyzing relevant facts and laws, then write the case arguing for a particular outcome based on the interpretation.
Criterion policy
The document discusses policy claims and impacts. It states that policy claims should be evaluated based on their net benefits and that the policy with the largest and most likely positive impacts should be considered the winner.
Criterion value case
The document discusses evaluating claims of value. It suggests looking at arguments on balance to determine which side has the most significant arguments.
Criterion claims of fact
The document discusses evidentiary standards for determining the validity of claims. It states that a claim of fact can be supported by a preponderance of evidence, meaning whoever has the most and best evidence wins.
Policy case formats comparative advantages version 2
The document outlines the standard format for a policy case, including sections for background on the status quo, description of the proposed plan, advocacy for how the plan will be enacted and enforced, and funding. The case then presents advantages of the plan through specific links between the plan and impacts, explaining why the impacts are significant.
Policy case format- comparative advantages
The document outlines the key components of a policy case format, including: 1) background on the current situation; 2) details of the proposed plan such as what it will do, who will enact it, and how it will be implemented and funded; and 3) advantages that discuss the status quo, link it to the current situation, explain how the plan provides a solvency, and discuss the impact. The format is used to present a policy proposal and arguments for why it should be adopted.
Value case format #1
This document outlines a 3-part format for presenting a value case argument. The format includes: 1) an introduction that defines terms, states the value being argued for, and the criterion being used, 2) up to 3 contentions that each describe a status quo scenario, link it to the resolution and defended value, and explain the impact, and 3) a closing statement. The value case argues that adopting the resolution best upholds an important value or criterion, such as maximizing well-being or protecting rights and liberties.
Parliamentary Debate Overview
Teams of two students debate parliamentary style on current event topics claiming a position of fact, value, or policy. Each debater has a designated speech time totaling 45 minutes with the Prime Minister and Leader of Opposition giving the opening and closing arguments while constructing and rebutting cases within time limits.
A Visual Guide to 1 Samuel | A Tale of Two Hearts
These slides walk through the story of 1 Samuel. Samuel is the last judge of Israel. The people reject God and want a king. Saul is anointed as the first king, but he is not a good king. David, the shepherd boy is anointed and Saul is envious of him. David shows honor while Saul continues to self destruct.
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) Curriculum
(𝐓𝐋𝐄 𝟏𝟎𝟎) (𝐋𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝟏)-𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐬
𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐄𝐏𝐏 𝐂𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐮𝐦 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐏𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐩𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬:
- Understand the goals and objectives of the Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) curriculum, recognizing its importance in fostering practical life skills and values among students. Students will also be able to identify the key components and subjects covered, such as agriculture, home economics, industrial arts, and information and communication technology.
𝐄𝐱𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐍𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐒𝐜𝐨𝐩𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐧 𝐄𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐮𝐫:
-Define entrepreneurship, distinguishing it from general business activities by emphasizing its focus on innovation, risk-taking, and value creation. Students will describe the characteristics and traits of successful entrepreneurs, including their roles and responsibilities, and discuss the broader economic and social impacts of entrepreneurial activities on both local and global scales.
How to Fix [Errno 98] address already in use
This slide will represent the cause of the error “[Errno 98] address already in use” and the troubleshooting steps to resolve this error in Odoo.
More Related Content
More from Eric Robertson
Random drills
The document describes various debate scenarios or "random drills" involving different situations that may occur in a debate round and requests discussion on how to respond. It provides prompts for how to handle issues like the opposition not engaging your strategy, multiple counterplans being run, dealing with a perceived false fact, a plan not aligning with the resolution definitions, a delay counterplan being called topical, vagueness in a standard of ground presentation, saving an important dropped disad, responding when only harms are discussed without advantages, and weighing a pre-fiat position victory against advantages victory. It also includes a resolution interpretation prompt and requests on turning countercontentions into disads and a tricot argument.
Pre fiat impacts
This document discusses pre-fiat impacts and how examining them differs from examining fiat impacts. Pre-fiat impacts are the possible effects that could occur if a policy or plan was enacted without the fiat assumption, while fiat impacts examine the effects assuming the plan is passed by fiat. Some examples of pre-fiat impacts mentioned are giving voice to marginalized groups, promoting better debate, and allowing new ways of thinking about issues. The document encourages thinking of additional pre-fiat impacts and re-examining past debate cases to develop pre-fiat impacts from the government side.
Policy as value
The document discusses using a "policy as value" debate technique where one argues that a policy position reflects certain values or principles. It suggests setting up a framework for using this technique by outlining the values a policy would uphold. The document also provides examples of using this for debates about legalizing a certain issue or reforming health care.
Solvency press and fiat abuse
This document provides guidance on debate techniques for day 3 of Debate Camp. It outlines two steps to take when critiquing an opponent's plan: 1) Illustrate how the plan does not solve the problems it aims to solve through reasoning or examples, and 2) Revisit the harms being addressed and discuss how each problem gets worse due to the plan's impact. It then provides examples of debate topics and potential plans with issues that could be exploited, such as plans relying on actions by entities outside the resolution or making implausible causal claims. Types of potential fiat abuse are also listed, such as multi-step plans or those relying on multi-actor cooperation.
Topicality overview
Topicality ensures debates focus on the agreed upon resolution and prevents teams from arguing unrelated topics. It protects the opposition from having to respond to arguments outside the scope of the debate by clarifying what issues teams should address. Topicality is assessed based on whether arguments align with the resolution and remain on the agreed upon topic of discussion.
Opp strategies overview
This document discusses various argument strategies that can be used in a debate for different types of topics including topicality arguments, refutations, disadvantages, counterplans, kritiks, and vagueness arguments. It suggests tailoring the arguments to the specific topic being debated and addressing potential counter-arguments.
Policy case overview
Policy case formats typically involve either a Toulmin or IRAC structure. The Toulmin structure presents a claim, grounds or evidence for the claim, and a warrant or justification. The IRAC structure involves an issue, rule, analysis applying the rule to relevant facts, and a conclusion. While these are common, an advocate can develop their own format as long as it clearly presents the relevant elements of a strong policy argument.
Govt case construction comparative advantages
The document outlines the typical structure and components of a government policy case in comparative advantage format. It includes sections for background on the current situation, details of the proposed plan like what it will do, who will enact it, and how it will be enforced and funded. Each advantage then follows the structure of discussing the status quo, linking it to a current issue, explaining how the plan solves it, and the importance and impacts of doing so.
Govt case const policy stock issues
This document outlines the standard format for constructing a government policy case in debate. It includes sections for discussing the harm, inherency of the problem, plan text describing the solution, agency responsible, mandate and enforcement of the plan, funding, solvency analysis showing how the plan solves the problem, advantages, and linking the plan's impacts to the issues being debated. The overall goal is for the government team to introduce a harm, prove it will continue without intervention, and then show how their proposed plan solves the problem.
Creating a govt case overview
The document outlines the steps to create a government case: identify the type of claim or issue, interpret the topic by analyzing relevant facts and laws, then write the case arguing for a particular outcome based on the interpretation.
Criterion policy
The document discusses policy claims and impacts. It states that policy claims should be evaluated based on their net benefits and that the policy with the largest and most likely positive impacts should be considered the winner.
Criterion value case
The document discusses evaluating claims of value. It suggests looking at arguments on balance to determine which side has the most significant arguments.
Criterion claims of fact
The document discusses evidentiary standards for determining the validity of claims. It states that a claim of fact can be supported by a preponderance of evidence, meaning whoever has the most and best evidence wins.
Policy case formats comparative advantages version 2
The document outlines the standard format for a policy case, including sections for background on the status quo, description of the proposed plan, advocacy for how the plan will be enacted and enforced, and funding. The case then presents advantages of the plan through specific links between the plan and impacts, explaining why the impacts are significant.
Policy case format- comparative advantages
The document outlines the key components of a policy case format, including: 1) background on the current situation; 2) details of the proposed plan such as what it will do, who will enact it, and how it will be implemented and funded; and 3) advantages that discuss the status quo, link it to the current situation, explain how the plan provides a solvency, and discuss the impact. The format is used to present a policy proposal and arguments for why it should be adopted.
Value case format #1
This document outlines a 3-part format for presenting a value case argument. The format includes: 1) an introduction that defines terms, states the value being argued for, and the criterion being used, 2) up to 3 contentions that each describe a status quo scenario, link it to the resolution and defended value, and explain the impact, and 3) a closing statement. The value case argues that adopting the resolution best upholds an important value or criterion, such as maximizing well-being or protecting rights and liberties.
Parliamentary Debate Overview
Teams of two students debate parliamentary style on current event topics claiming a position of fact, value, or policy. Each debater has a designated speech time totaling 45 minutes with the Prime Minister and Leader of Opposition giving the opening and closing arguments while constructing and rebutting cases within time limits.
More from Eric Robertson (17)
Policy case formats comparative advantages version 2
Policy case formats comparative advantages version 2
Recently uploaded
A Visual Guide to 1 Samuel | A Tale of Two Hearts
These slides walk through the story of 1 Samuel. Samuel is the last judge of Israel. The people reject God and want a king. Saul is anointed as the first king, but he is not a good king. David, the shepherd boy is anointed and Saul is envious of him. David shows honor while Saul continues to self destruct.
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) Curriculum
(𝐓𝐋𝐄 𝟏𝟎𝟎) (𝐋𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝟏)-𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐬
𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐄𝐏𝐏 𝐂𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐮𝐦 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐏𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐩𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬:
- Understand the goals and objectives of the Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) curriculum, recognizing its importance in fostering practical life skills and values among students. Students will also be able to identify the key components and subjects covered, such as agriculture, home economics, industrial arts, and information and communication technology.
𝐄𝐱𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐍𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐒𝐜𝐨𝐩𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐧 𝐄𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐮𝐫:
-Define entrepreneurship, distinguishing it from general business activities by emphasizing its focus on innovation, risk-taking, and value creation. Students will describe the characteristics and traits of successful entrepreneurs, including their roles and responsibilities, and discuss the broader economic and social impacts of entrepreneurial activities on both local and global scales.
How to Fix [Errno 98] address already in use
This slide will represent the cause of the error “[Errno 98] address already in use” and the troubleshooting steps to resolve this error in Odoo.
Geography as a Discipline Chapter 1 __ Class 11 Geography NCERT _ Class Notes...
Geography as discipline
NIPER 2024 MEMORY BASED QUESTIONS.ANSWERS TO NIPER 2024 QUESTIONS.NIPER JEE 2...
NIPER JEE PYQ
NIPER JEE QUESTIONS
MOST FREQUENTLY ASK QUESTIONS
NIPER MEMORY BASED QUWSTIONS
How to Manage Reception Report in Odoo 17
A business may deal with both sales and purchases occasionally. They buy things from vendors and then sell them to their customers. Such dealings can be confusing at times. Because multiple clients may inquire about the same product at the same time, after purchasing those products, customers must be assigned to them. Odoo has a tool called Reception Report that can be used to complete this assignment. By enabling this, a reception report comes automatically after confirming a receipt, from which we can assign products to orders.
Bossa N’ Roll Records by Ismael Vazquez.
Bossa N Roll Records presentation by Izzy Vazquez for Music Retail and Distribution class at Full Sail University
BPSC-105 important questions for june term end exam
BPSC-105 important questions for june term end exam
HYPERTENSION - SLIDE SHARE PRESENTATION.
IT WILL BE HELPFULL FOR THE NUSING STUDENTS
IT FOCUSED ON MEDICAL MANAGEMENT AND NURSING MANAGEMENT.
HIGHLIGHTS ON HEALTH EDUCATION.
Recently uploaded (20)
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) Curriculum
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) Curriculum
Geography as a Discipline Chapter 1 __ Class 11 Geography NCERT _ Class Notes...
Geography as a Discipline Chapter 1 __ Class 11 Geography NCERT _ Class Notes...
spot a liar (Haiqa 146).pptx Technical writhing and presentation skills
spot a liar (Haiqa 146).pptx Technical writhing and presentation skills
NIPER 2024 MEMORY BASED QUESTIONS.ANSWERS TO NIPER 2024 QUESTIONS.NIPER JEE 2...
NIPER 2024 MEMORY BASED QUESTIONS.ANSWERS TO NIPER 2024 QUESTIONS.NIPER JEE 2...
SWOT analysis in the project Keeping the Memory @live.pptx
SWOT analysis in the project Keeping the Memory @live.pptx
REASIGNACION 2024 UGEL CHUPACA 2024 UGEL CHUPACA.pdf
REASIGNACION 2024 UGEL CHUPACA 2024 UGEL CHUPACA.pdf
Juneteenth Freedom Day 2024 David Douglas School District
Juneteenth Freedom Day 2024 David Douglas School District
BPSC-105 important questions for june term end exam
BPSC-105 important questions for june term end exam
Fact case format
- 1. Fact Cases
- 2. FACT CASES Introductory Remarks State topic State your support for this topic Interpretation of topic as fact, value, or policy
- 3. Fact Cases Resolutional Analysis Criterion (preponderance of evidence)
- 4. Fact Cases Contention 1 (1-3 word title) Provide an example of something that supports the resolution Link- Specifically show how this relates to the resolution Contention 2 (1-3 word title) Provide an example of something that supports the resolution Link- Specifically show how this relates to the resolution Contention 3 (1-3 word title) Provide an example of something that supports the resolution Link- Specifically show how this relates to the resolution