I sette principi per un’agricoltura sostenibile descritti nel rapporto di Greenpeace sono:
1. restituire il controllo sulla filiera alimentare a chi produce e chi consuma, strappandolo alle multinazionali dell’agrochimica;
2. sovranità alimentare. L'agricoltura sostenibile contribuisce allo sviluppo rurale e alla lotta contro la fame e la povertà, garantendo alle comunità rurali la disponibilità di alimenti sani, sicuri ed economicamente sostenibili;
3. produrre e consumare meglio: è possibile già oggi, senza impattare sull’ambiente e la salute, garantire sicurezza alimentare e, contemporaneamente, lottare contro gli sprechi alimentari. Occorre diminuire il nostro consumo di carne e minimizzare il consumo di suolo
per la produzione di agro-energia. Dobbiamo anche riuscire ad aumentare le rese dove è necessario, ma con pratiche sostenibili;
4. incoraggiare la (bio)diversità lungo tutta la filiera, dal seme al piatto con interventi a tutto campo, dalla produzione sementiera all’educazione al consumo;
5. proteggere e aumentare la fertilità del suolo, promuovendo le pratiche colturali idonee ed eliminando quelle che invece consumano o avvelenano il suolo stesso;
6. consentire agli agricoltori di tenere sotto controllo parassiti e piante infestanti, affermando e promuovendo quelle pratiche (già esistenti) che garantiscono protezione e rese senza l'impiego di costosi pesticidi chimici che possono danneggiare il suolo, l'acqua,
gli ecosistemi e la salute di agricoltori e consumatori;
7. rafforzare la nostra agricoltura, perché si adatti in maniera efficace il sistema di produzione del cibo in un contesto di cambiamenti climatici e di instabilità economica.
Per contribuire alla crescita dell’agricoltura sostenibile, Greenpeace collabora con agricoltori e comunità rurali.
I sette principi per un’agricoltura sostenibile descritti nel rapporto di Greenpeace sono:
1. restituire il controllo sulla filiera alimentare a chi produce e chi consuma, strappandolo alle multinazionali dell’agrochimica;
2. sovranità alimentare. L'agricoltura sostenibile contribuisce allo sviluppo rurale e alla lotta contro la fame e la povertà, garantendo alle comunità rurali la disponibilità di alimenti sani, sicuri ed economicamente sostenibili;
3. produrre e consumare meglio: è possibile già oggi, senza impattare sull’ambiente e la salute, garantire sicurezza alimentare e, contemporaneamente, lottare contro gli sprechi alimentari. Occorre diminuire il nostro consumo di carne e minimizzare il consumo di suolo
per la produzione di agro-energia. Dobbiamo anche riuscire ad aumentare le rese dove è necessario, ma con pratiche sostenibili;
4. incoraggiare la (bio)diversità lungo tutta la filiera, dal seme al piatto con interventi a tutto campo, dalla produzione sementiera all’educazione al consumo;
5. proteggere e aumentare la fertilità del suolo, promuovendo le pratiche colturali idonee ed eliminando quelle che invece consumano o avvelenano il suolo stesso;
6. consentire agli agricoltori di tenere sotto controllo parassiti e piante infestanti, affermando e promuovendo quelle pratiche (già esistenti) che garantiscono protezione e rese senza l'impiego di costosi pesticidi chimici che possono danneggiare il suolo, l'acqua,
gli ecosistemi e la salute di agricoltori e consumatori;
7. rafforzare la nostra agricoltura, perché si adatti in maniera efficace il sistema di produzione del cibo in un contesto di cambiamenti climatici e di instabilità economica.
Per contribuire alla crescita dell’agricoltura sostenibile, Greenpeace collabora con agricoltori e comunità rurali.
Improving diet diversity, quality and ecosystem sustainability. By Federico Mattei Bioversity International. Read more about Bioversity International’s work on diet diversity for nutrition and health. http://www.bioversityinternational.org/research-portfolio/diet-diversity/
Environmental science Module 1 Topic. This PPT is not a work of mine and was provided by our college professor during our graduation, so I am not sure about the original author. The credit goes to the Original author.
Sustainable Agriculture And Environmental Protection Usda Weri Nri UnChristina Parmionova
The Brundtland Commission, formally the World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED), known by the name of its Chair Gro Harlem Brundtland, was convened by the United Nations in 1983. The commission was created to address growing concern "about the accelerating deterioration of the human environment and natural resources and the consequences of that deterioration for economic and social development." In establishing the commission, the UN General Assembly recognized that environmental problems were global in nature and determined that it was in the common interest of all nations to establish policies for sustainable development.
Improving diet diversity, quality and ecosystem sustainability. By Federico Mattei Bioversity International. Read more about Bioversity International’s work on diet diversity for nutrition and health. http://www.bioversityinternational.org/research-portfolio/diet-diversity/
Environmental science Module 1 Topic. This PPT is not a work of mine and was provided by our college professor during our graduation, so I am not sure about the original author. The credit goes to the Original author.
Sustainable Agriculture And Environmental Protection Usda Weri Nri UnChristina Parmionova
The Brundtland Commission, formally the World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED), known by the name of its Chair Gro Harlem Brundtland, was convened by the United Nations in 1983. The commission was created to address growing concern "about the accelerating deterioration of the human environment and natural resources and the consequences of that deterioration for economic and social development." In establishing the commission, the UN General Assembly recognized that environmental problems were global in nature and determined that it was in the common interest of all nations to establish policies for sustainable development.
Great quality, black and red is sexy.Though they are factory variants, but i definitely recommend these shoes they look super real and they even got the same kind of material on the shoe, and also they come with the lace locks and the comfy - all FREE SHIPPING to your house in 6~8 days.
Que commerce SEO MENG Seminar (Local Search To Marketing)Justin Croxton
In this seminar, we discuss the world of SEO, how to ties directly in traditional marketing best practices, and how companies can level SEO to attract for search and referral traffic.
Consumer Awareness and Satisfaction towards Organic Products in Palakkad Dist...ijtsrd
The adoption of organic production and processing is highly determined by market demand. Therefore this is reflected in consumers awareness and satisfaction towards organic food products. This research result indicated that the main reason for purchasing organic food products is an expectation of a healthier and environment friendly means of production. Organic buyer tend to be older and higher educated than who do not buy them. However, the main barrier to increase the market share of organic food product is consumer information. Abisha. KA | Dr. P. Kannan"Consumer Awareness and Satisfaction towards Organic Products in Palakkad District-Kerala" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-2 | Issue-2 , February 2018, URL: http://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd9403.pdf http://www.ijtsrd.com/management/marketing/9403/consumer-awareness-and-satisfaction-towards-organic-products-in-palakkad-district-kerala/abisha-ka
Chapter 3 reword1. In what ways does industrialized farming affe.docxwalterl4
Chapter 3 reword
1. In what ways does industrialized farming affect ecological integrity?
Answer: As American agriculture has become more industrial, it has become increasingly dependent on fossil energy and other finite natural resources. The total food system currently claims about twenty-percent of all fossil energy used in the U.S., with farming accounting for about one-third of the total percentage. In fact, our industrial food system requires about ten calories of fossil energy for every calorie of food energy produced. Supplies of fossil energy are finite, and there is a growing consensus that fossil energy in the future will be far less plentiful and costlier.
Pollution represents negative energy, in that it destroys the usefulness of other energy resources or requires energy to mitigate its negative impacts. Industrial agriculture pollutes the air, water, and soil with toxic agrochemicals and livestock manure. It is a major source of pollution, accounting for more than twenty-percent of total greenhouse gas emissions, even more than transportation. In fact, agriculture has become the number one nonpoint source of pollution in the U.S., creating huge dead zones in the Chesapeake Bay and Gulf of Mexico. An industrial agriculture is not ecologically sustainable.
Industrial agriculture also is a significant contributor to the depletion of social energy. Farm workers today are among the lowest paid workers in the U.S., while working under dangerous and disagreeable conditions, most without adequate health care or other fringe benefits. A growing reliance on migrant farm workers also creates cultural and political conflicts, particularly in times when good paying jobs are few. Many farm families fare little better, as independent farmers are periodically forced out of business to make room for further corporate consolidation. Therefore, rural communities in agricultural areas have suffered decades of economic and social decline and decay.
2. The concept of ecosystem services is gaining increasing recognition. What are some of the most important ecosystem services provided by agriculture? To what extent do you think a threatened loss of ecosystem services can drive change in policy and practice? Why?
Answer: Ecosystem services are defined as “the benefits provided by ecosystems to humans”. Many key ecosystem services provided by biodiversity, such as nutrient cycling, carbon sequestration, pest regulation and pollination, sustain agricultural productivity. Promoting the healthy functioning of ecosystems ensures the resilience of agriculture as it intensifies to meet growing demands for food production. Climate change and other stresses have the potential to make major impacts on key functions, such as pollination and pest regulation services. Learning to strengthen the ecosystem linkages that promote resilience and to mitigate the forces that impede the ability of agro-ecosystems to deliver goods and services remains an important challenge..
Organic Farming: History and Techniques
`
For more information, Please see websites below:
`
Organic Edible Schoolyards & Gardening with Children
http://scribd.com/doc/239851214
`
Double Food Production from your School Garden with Organic Tech
http://scribd.com/doc/239851079
`
Free School Gardening Art Posters
http://scribd.com/doc/239851159`
`
Increase Food Production with Companion Planting in your School Garden
http://scribd.com/doc/239851159
`
Healthy Foods Dramatically Improves Student Academic Success
http://scribd.com/doc/239851348
`
City Chickens for your Organic School Garden
http://scribd.com/doc/239850440
`
Simple Square Foot Gardening for Schools - Teacher Guide
http://scribd.com/doc/239851110
How to feed the world and preserve the environmentHaulTail
Farmers bear much of the burden for growing the food to feed billions of people as the world's population continually trends upward.
But to do so, those farmers have to keep crops healthy and high-yielding. That necessitates using fertilizers and pesticides, which help crops but can have an inadvertent, negative impact on the environment.
Pollinators can be harmed. Waterways can become infiltrated with nutrient loads, killing aquatic life. Atmospheric greenhouse gases that cause climate change are increased.
On one hand, feed the world. On the other, preserve the environment.
Sylvie Brouder, a professor in the Purdue Department of Agronomy, knows it's possible to do both.
Agriculture has made an enormous environmental footprint and is making agricultural development risky. Green agriculture uses well developed modern farming and sustainability concepts to improve natural agricultural techniques. It also draws on green technology to enhance farming. This paper provides a brief introduction on green agriculture. Matthew N. O. Sadiku | Adedamola A. Omotoso | Sarhan M. Musa ""Green Agriculture"" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-4 | Issue-2 , February 2020, URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd29792.pdf
Paper Url : https://www.ijtsrd.com/engineering/other/29792/green-agriculture/matthew-n-o-sadiku
Sustainable Practices That Can Save Future Farming, As Per Benedict T Palen J...Benedict T. Palen, Jr
The future of farming is in a crucial phase due to the continued increase in global population and the additional problems posed by climate change. According to Benedict t palen Jr The practices that can save farming in the future are examined in this article.
Organic agriculture is a best way to make food healthy with doing no harm to soil and atmosphere. Agriculture education is necessary for all of the best knowledge for a better career with better future for every common people.
Experts Discuss the Safety & Benefits of Plant Biotechnology by Ranjana Smetacek
1. Experts Discuss the Safety & Benefits of Plant Biotechnology
by Ranjana Smetacek
REASON #1: Using GM crops, farmers is able to reduce pesticide spraying, decrease greenhouse
gas emissions and increase yields.
Evidence continues to accumulate about how
http://www.kiwibox.com/microtechn443/blog/entry/113637541/manufacture-of-biologics precisely
genetically modified food crops are helping to preserve environmental surroundings. "Here you will
find there's very versatile technology, which includes the energy as well as the ability to contribute
to an even more effective, a more benign, a more sustainable agriculture," says Dr. Clive James, an
agricultural scientist and founder from the not-for-profit International Service for the Acquisition of
Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA).
For example, insect-resistant (Bt) crops offer an substitute for, and lower the use of, agricultural
pesticides including insecticides and fungicides. Since Bt corn and cotton can produce their
particular protection against specifically targeted pests, farmers is effective in reducing how much
pesticides required to control them. Since 1996, farmers have reduced pesticide applications by
172,000 metric tons being a direct result of genetically modified food crops.
"What's been amazing to many people of us is always that we've seen advances that even were
beyond our wildest expectations," says Dr. Roger Beachy regarding genetically engineered plants.
Dr. Beachy is often a researcher and founding president with the not-for-profit Donald Danforth
Plant Science Center. "We all knew it turned out theoretically possible, but to really do it and deploy
it in to the field. And then, at the end of 4 to 5 years, report that it is an advantage of growing yields
reducing using agriculture chemicals by 50 million pounds 12 months. It's a great number."
This decrease in using pesticides has consequently reduced the fuel, water and packaging which are
accustomed to manufacture, distribute and apply pesticides. Typical savings include the reduction of
diesel fuel that is used in manufacturing, shipping and storing insecticides; the conservation of
water utilized by farmers when applying pesticides; the reduction of tractor and aviation fuel also
found in applications; as well as a decrease in the waste generated from your disposal of packaging.
Herbicide-tolerant crops have enabled farmers to work with more benign herbicides that rapidly
dissipate in soil and water. In addition, herbicide-tolerant crops have spurred the adoption of no till
farming ? the reduction or removal of plowing to get rid of weeds and disturb the soil for planting.
The environmentally beneficial tillage practices conserve topsoil, preserving soil moisture and
reducing runoff; slow up the release of greenhouse gas emissions; and make and improve habitats
for birds along with other wildlife.
Genetically modified food crops also help in producing more food for a passing fancy level of land,
which reduces the have to clear additional land for cultivation. This ends in less influence on
prairies, wetlands, forests along with other fragile ecosystems that might well be converted for
agricultural purposes.
"Production in Brazil has increased significantly without great increases in the region essential for
agriculture. There is fantastic pressure presently concerning certain environments, like the Brazilian
mountainous regions and the wetlands, the Amazon region," says Dr. Francisco Arag?o, senior
2. researcher in Genetic Research and Biotechnology at Embrapa in Brazil. "One in the ways we help
preserve these areas is by increasing productivity and never have to increase how much land used
for agriculture."
Scientists agree that habitat destruction could be the biggest single threat to biodiversity. Producing
increasing levels of food without increasing arable land carries a major effect on protecting wildlife
habitats.
"Biodiversity is crucial for all those life on the planet. And all kinds of agriculture ? including organic
farming ? is really a threat to biodiversity," says Dr. Klaus Ammann about the significance about
biodiversity. Dr. Ammann can be an
http://www.kiwibox.com/manufactur609/blog/entry/113232739/biography-chief-executive-officer/
honorary professor emeritus and former director with the Botanical Garden in the University of Bern
in Switzerland. "There are numerous methods for doing better in agriculture, but one with the most
efficient and greatest ways is biotechnology."
"I've studied this carefully, as well as the evidence is fairly clear on certain points," says The
Honorable Lord Taverne around the safety of genetically modified foods. Lord Taverne can be a
member of the House of Lords in the United Kingdom Parliament and founder with the charity Sense
about Science. "It's reduced the use of pesticides. It produces greater productivity. And, if it reduces
the quantity of farmland you have to work with, it can actually be very beneficial to biodiversity."
REASON #2: Increased yield and income from biotech crops improves the standard of living for
farmers in developing countries.
Small- and large-scale family farms worldwide are benefiting from
increased yields, reduced production costs, or both in some
instances to generate significantly improved net economic returns
as a consequence of genetically
http://www.squidoo.com/learn-the-best-remedy-for-our-investments
modified food crops.
"If you appear at the adoption of biotech crops since 1996, it's been
on a significant upward curve in terms from the area planted. And
the key driver of this has been the economical benefits that farmers
have produced by it ? US$28 billion worth of extra farm income for the farmers who have used the
technology," says Graham Brookes regarding the attributes of biotechnology in agriculture. Brookes
is an agricultural economist and director of PG Economics in England. "Now that rise in farm income
has become spread across all of the countries who have used the technology, in the the planet along
with developing countries."
Of the 10.3 million farmers who planted biotech crops in 22 countries in 2006, 90 percent were
small, resource-poor farmers from 11 developing countries including Argentina, Brazil, China,
Columbia, Honduras, India, Mexico, Paraguay, Philippines, South Africa and Uruguay. In these
areas, the improved income from biotech crops produces a contribution to the economics of family
farms along with the alleviation of poverty.
"Poverty today is often a rural phenomenon. eighty percent of the poor people that we have on this
planet today are farmers or people that work on farms," explains Dr. James. "So, therefore, if you
3. can introduce biotech crops that may improve the salary of they will, then you're making a direct
contribution to the alleviation of poverty."
"If we give important technologies growing more food in poor places ? better seed varieties, better
ways to deal with soil nutrients, good ways to control plant pathogens ? it's going to create
livelihoods. It's going to generate income inside villages. It's gonna convert what's now sub-
subsistence agriculture into commercial farming. ? enhancing the poorest with the poor to purchase
a sustainable future on their own," says Dr. Jeffrey Sachs regarding the pros of genetically modified
foods in alleviating hunger in developing countries. Dr. Sachs may be the director of the Earth
Institute and with the United Nations Millennium Project.
As agricultural productivity increases within the developing world, it also drives economic growth
and expands the opportunity to trade, causing more and better jobs, better medical and education.
"We interviewed 10,000 farmers spread across India," says Dr. Laveesh Bhandari, economist and
director of Indicus Analytics in India. "What our study shows is that the effect on overall
development of the household and also the community is fairly phenomenal in Bt cotton-producing
areas. Greater incomes, greater use of healthcare services, greater education, as well as on a
number of dimensions ? we find that Bt cotton production makes the farmer, your family and also
the community happier."
Global population projections claim that by 2020, there will be one more 1.2 billion people for the
planet, that's equivalent for the population of Africa and South America combined. "Looking ahead
towards the year 2050, we're going to have to produce the meals and fiber for something
approaching 10 billion people," says Dr. Norman Borlaug, the 1970 Nobel Peace Prize Recipient for
his leadership role within the Green Revolution to boost food production. "Can we take action? I say
yes. If we continue to develop technology ? including more widespread putting on biotechnology."
(c) 2007 Monsanto Company. All rights reserved. The copyright holder consents to the use of this
fabric and the images within the published context only and solely to the purpose of promoting the
advantages of agricultural biotechnology.
Ranjana Smetacek is the director of Global Biotech Acceptance for Monsanto. On the net at