A reading program for Grade 9 in the Philippines. Note: This is not an official Reading program for grade 9. This is only a sample reading program that was made by the MAESL Students in Benguet State University as a requirement in Teaching Reading and Literary Appreciation. For Word Format just comment below.
A reading program for Grade 9 in the Philippines. Note: This is not an official Reading program for grade 9. This is only a sample reading program that was made by the MAESL Students in Benguet State University as a requirement in Teaching Reading and Literary Appreciation. For Word Format just comment below.
AMH 2042 RVC Spring 2019Essay Paper Grading Rubric Adopted f.docxgreg1eden90113
Â
AMH 2042 RVC Spring 2019
Essay Paper Grading Rubric
Adopted from Professor Jay Aronson, Carnegie Mellon University
Excellent
Good
Needs Improvement
Poor
F
Overall Impression
Author directly addresses main question or issue, and adds new insight to the subject not provided in lectures, readings, or class discussions. The author has retained nearly all of the knowledge presented in class. He/She is able to synthesize this knowledge in new ways and relate to material not covered in the course.
Author competently addresses main question or issue, but does not add much new insight into the subject. That said, it is clear that the author has learned a great deal in class and is able to communicate this knowledge to others.
Author attempts to address main question or issue, but fails. The author has retained some information from the course, but does not fully understand its meaning or context and cannot clearly convey it to others.
Essay does NOT address main question or issue, and it is obvious that author has not retained any information from the course.
P
L
A
G
I
A
R
I
S
M
Argument
Essay contains a clear argumentâi.e., lets the reader know exactly what the author is trying to communicate.
An argument is present, but reader must reconstruct it from the text.
Author attempts, but fails, to make an argument (e.g., starts with a rhetorical question/statement or anecdote that is never put into context).
No attempt is made to articulate an argument.
Evidence
Provides compelling and accurate evidence that convinces reader to accept main argument. The importance/relevance of all pieces of evidence is clearly stated. There are no gaps in reasoningâi.e., the reader does not need to assume anything or do additional research to accept main argument.
Provides necessary evidence to convince reader of most aspects of the main argument but not all. The importance/ relevance of some evidence presented may not be totally clear. Reader must make a few mental leaps or do some additional research to fully accept all aspects of main argument.
Not enough evidence is provided to support authorâs argument, or evidence is incomplete, incorrect, or oversimplified. Information from lectures and readings is not effectively used.
Either no evidence is provided, or there are numerous factual mistakes, omissions or oversimplifications. There is little or no mention of information from lectures and readings.
Excellent
Good
Needs Improvement
Poor
F
Counter-Evidence
The author considers the evidence, or alternate interpretations of evidence, that could be used to refute or weaken his/her argument, and thoughtfully responds to it.
Author acknowledges that counter-evidence or alternative interpretations exists, and lists them fully, but does not effectively explain to reader why his/her argument still stands.
Author acknowledges some of the most obvious counter-evidence and alternative explanations, but is not comprehensi.
Requirements and Evaluation ofResearch Paper Each student in H.docxheunice
Â
Requirements and Evaluation ofResearch Paper
Each student in HAS 5125 course will be asked to write a polished original research paper. The research paper will increase the studentâs critical perspectives, awareness, and knowledge in a course subject area. Each paper will focus on a specific and narrowly defined topic. The topic could be formulation, implementation, or/and modification phases of any health policy making at federal or state level. Students choose the focus of their papers based on their professional and academic interests within the courseâs context. All topics must be approved before writing. Students may consult individually with instructor as they formulate research topics, collect sources, draft their papers, and revise work for final submission.
The paper should demonstrate that the student has read widely and critically in the relevant field. The student has a chance to present his/her point of view through a well-structured and compelling paper while properly citing othersâ ideas. The paperâs references section should include at least 5reliable, current, and professional sources.
The paper must be at least 9 pages long including an abstract, with 12-pt font double-spaced, and 1 inch margins all around. The paper should adhere to the American Psychological Association style manual, and must be submitted to the Blackboard before the deadline. According to FIU policy, student papers will be checked by the Blackboard plagiarism detection software. Violations of the student code of conduct (plagiarism, cheating) will result in an F being assigned for this course.
Research Paper Rubric
4
Exceeds Expectations
3
Meets Expectations
2
Approaches Expectations
1
Does not Meet Expectations
Abstract
Clearly and sequentially conveys the content of paper
Gives a general overview of paper topic, but no sequential elaboration of contents
Does not provide a clear representation of paper contents
Not provided
Topic Introduction
Excellent introduction that addressed purpose, theoretical basis, and significance of the paper topic. The significance of the research paper has been established and grounded in previous knowledge or research.
Adequate introduce purpose, and significance of the topic with some weaknesses. The significance of the research has been established.
Significant weaknesses in introduction of purpose, significance of the topic.
The introduction is unacceptable.
Development
Paper statement or research question addresses a relevant and specific course area and advances a new argument or perspective
Paper statement or research question addresses a relevant and specific course area
Paper statement or research question is overly general but makes an arguable claim
Paper statement or research question is not well defined or absent
Evidence
Paper statement or research question is thoroughly supported by evidence, examples, observations, and appropriate citations
Paper statement or research qu.
LEIS1130 Essay (30%) â Trimester 2 2017 - Due Friday 21st July 10pm Australia time (Turnitin)
Student: Submitted:
Criteria/
Standards
Poor
<50%
Satisfactory
50-64 %
Good
65-74%
Very Good
75-84%
Excellent
>85%
Research/
Literature
Student demonstrates
inadequate research skills;
literature used is irrelevant
or insufficient; did not use
a minimum of 6 scholarly
sources.
Student demonstrates
adequate research skills;
some literature used is
irrelevant but includes 6
scholarly references.
Student demonstrates
good research skills;
good choice of
literature; 6 relevant
scholarly references.
Student demonstrates very
good research skills; very
good choice of literature;
6 or more scholarly
references.
Student demonstrates
outstanding research skills;
excellent choice of
literature; 6 or more
scholarly references.
Knowledge/
Understanding
Poor knowledge and
understanding of the
chosen topic; student has
not read sufficient and/or
appropriate material to
engage with key concepts
and issues.
Satisfactory knowledge and
understanding of the
chosen topic; evidence of
sufficient reading on the
topic but limited critical
engagement with key
concepts and issues.
Good knowledge and
understanding of the
chosen topic; evidence of
sufficient reading and
emerging critical
engagement with key
concepts and issues.
Very good knowledge
and understanding of
the chosen topic;
evidence of wide
reading and sound
critical engagement
with key concepts and
issues.
Excellent knowledge and
understanding of the
chosen topic; evidence of
substantial reading and
sophisticated critical
engagement with key
concepts and issues.
Discussion/
Argument
Unsatisfactory -
argument irrelevant
and/or lacks logic; aim
and purpose of the essay
was not stated in the
Introduction; little or no
critical insight; poor
synthesis of theoretical
and conceptual material;
weak or no conclusion.
Satisfactory - but at times
argument lacks relevance
and/or logic; aim and
purpose of the essay could
be more clearly stated in
the Introduction; some
critical insight; basic
synthesis of theoretical and
conceptual material; weak
conclusion.
Good - relevant and
logical argument; aim and
purpose of the essay is
clearly stated in the
Introduction; good critical
insight; good synthesis of
theoretical and
conceptual material; good
conclusion.
Very good - relevant and
logical argument; aim and
purpose of the essay is
clearly stated in the
Introduction; very good
critical insight; very good
synthesis of theoretical
and conceptual material;
very good conclusion.
Excellent - original, relevant
and logical argument;
excellent critical insight; aim
and purpose of the essay is
clearly stated in the
Introduction; excellent
synthesis of theoretical and
conceptual material; strong
conclusion.
Writing/
Structure
Poor - frequent
typographical, spelling,
punct ...
GRADING CRITERIA RUBRIC FOR PODCAST SCRIPT (100 POINTS EXAM)JeanmarieColbert3
Â
GRADING CRITERIA RUBRIC FOR PODCAST SCRIPT (100 POINTS EXAM)
Criteria Exceptional/Distinguished Admirable/Proficient Acceptable/Basic Unacceptable/Mediocre
Content
(Depth, Substance,
Thoroughness,
Insight, Originality)
30
An abundance of material clearly
related to thesis; points are
clearly made and all evidence
supports thesis; varied use of
materials
Script provides an accurate and
complete explanation of key
concepts and theories, drawing
upon relevant literature.
Applications of theory are
included to illuminate issues;
includes an original, insightful
interpretation of thesis, even the
professor may not have heard or
thought of.
Information completely
accurate; all names and facts
were precise and explicit.
Combines and evaluates existing
ideas to form new insights.
30 -- 24
Sufficient information
that relates to thesis;
many good points made
but there is an uneven
balance and little
variation
For the most part,
explanations of concepts
and theories are accurate
and complete. Some
helpful applications of
theory are included.
Student can
independently interpret
facts with a certain level
of depth and insight.
No significant errors are
made; a few
inconsistencies or errors
in information.
Combines existing ideas
to form new insights.
23 -- 18
There is a great deal
of information that is
not clearly connected
to the thesis
Explanations of
concepts and/or
theories are
inaccurate or
incomplete. Little
attempt is made to
tie in theory. There
is a great deal of
information that is
not connected to the
presentation thesis.
Enough errors are
made to distract a
knowledgeable
listener, but some
information is
accurate.
Combines existing
ideas.
17 -- 10
There is a great deal of
information that is not clearly
connected to the thesis ;
Thesis is not clear;
information included that
does not support thesis in
any way
No reference is made to
literature or theory. Thesis
not clear; information
included that does not
support thesis in any way.
No attempt made to be
original or insightful. If facts
are mentioned, student
merely parrots the
instructorâs lecture or an
authorâs position.
Information included is
sufficiently inaccurate that
the listener cannot depend on
the presentation as a source
of accurate information.
Shows little evidence of the
combination of ideas.
9 -- 0
Research efforts
Went above and beyond to
research information; solicited
material in addition to what was
provided; brought in personal
ideas and information to
enhance oral exam
Did a very good job of
researching; utilized
materials provided to
their full potential; at
times took the initiative
to find information
outside of what was
provided.
Used the material
provided in an
acceptable manner,
but did not consult
any additional
resources.
Did not utilize resources
effectively; did little or no
fact gathering on the topic. ...
GRST 500501Research Paper Grading RubricContentStructure.docxwhittemorelucilla
Â
GRST 500/501
Research Paper Grading Rubric
Content
Structure
Readability
Documentation
4
Clear and Consistent Competence
FOCUS: Clear and coherent
LOGIC: Clear and obvious flow of ideas
EVIDENCE: Assertions fully and appropriately supported
CONCEPT: Appropriate choice of topic, examples, and style
PURPOSE: Meets assignment guidelines and addresses appropriate material
TOPIC & DEVELOPMENT: Articulates a main point or topic early on; supports or amplifies thesis/topic sentence throughout; draws appropriate conclusions from evidence
ORGANIZATION: Clear structure with appropriate transitions where needed
PARAGRAPHS: Focused and well organized
MECHANICS: Contains only very minor grammar and punctuation errors or typos; errors must not seriously distract or harm clarity
DICTION: Appropriate word usage for topic and assignment
CLARITY: Easily understandable; clearly expressed
FORMAT: Format conforms to guidelines in the appropriate discipline
CITATION: Appropriate citation in text (or in footnote) and on works cited page (if required); smooth set-up of quotations, paraphrases, etc.
SOURCES: Well chosen, appropriate for field of study, sufficient in number and adequate to prove assertions
3
Adequate Competence
FOCUS: Obvious focus, generally maintained
LOGIC: Generally logical flow of thought
EVIDENCE: Supports most assertions well
CONCEPT: Generally appropriate choice of topic, examples, and style
PURPOSE: Basically meets assignment guidelines and addresses appropriate material
TOPIC & DEVELOPMENT: Generally articulates a main point or topic early on; mostly supports or amplifies thesis/topic sentence throughout; draws basically appropriate conclusions from evidence
ORGANIZATION: Generally clear structure with appropriate transitions where needed
PARAGRAPHS: Generally focused and well organized
MECHANICS: Contains some grammar and punctuation errors or typos; errors may distract but must not seriously harm clarity
DICTION: Generally appropriate word usage for topic and assignment
CLARITY: Generally understandable and clearly expressed
FORMAT: Format generally conforms to guidelines in the appropriate discipline
CITATION: Generally correct and appropriate citation in text (or in footnote) and on works cited page (if required); adequate set-up of quotations, paraphrases, etc.
SOURCES: Generally well chosen, and appropriate for field of study, sufficient in number and mostly adequate to prove assertions
Content
Structure
Readability
Documentation
2
Developing Competence
FOCUS: Weakly focused
LOGIC: Some leaps in logic or fallacious reasoning
EVIDENCE: Some assertions unsupported, or failure to distinguish between assertions and proof
CONCEPT: Weak choice of topic, examples, and style
PURPOSE: Does not meet assignment guidelines (but does not entirely fail to accomplish the objective)
TOPIC & DEVELOPMENT: Contains a point, evidence, and conclusion, but does not necessarily put them in the proper order or make them clearly vis ...
GRADING RUBRIC FOR THE PROJECTEvaluation DimensionNeeds improv.docxshericehewat
Â
GRADING RUBRIC FOR THE PROJECT
Evaluation Dimension
Needs improvement
Adequate
Excellent
Score
1 2
3 4
5 6
Purpose
Does not clearly state the goals of the project; displays lack of focus or detail
Clearly identifies the goals of the project, but sometimes may digress
Effectively identifies the goals of the project.
Comments:
Content
Issue is unclear, inaccurate, and/or incomplete; support for the goals of the project is weak or poorly discussed; displays only rudimentary knowledge of the content area; reader gains few if any insights
Presents clear and appropriate information that adequately supports the central goals of the project; demonstrates satisfactory knowledge of the issue area; reader gains some insights
Presents balanced, significant, and valid information that clearly and convincingly supports the goals of the project; demonstrates in-depth knowledge of the issue area; reader gains important insights
Comments:
Organization
Information/content is not logically organized or presented; topics/paragraphs are frequently disjointed and fail to make sense together; reader cannot identify a line of reasoning and loses interest
Information/content is presented in a clear and reasonable sequence; topic/paragraph transition is usually good with clear linkages for the most part; reader can generally understand and follow the line of reasoning
Information/content is presented in a logical, interesting, and effective sequence; topics flow smoothly and coherently from one to another and are clearly linked; reader can easily follow the line of reasoning
Comments:
Use of References
Most of the references are from sources that are not academic or professional, and have uncertain reliability; few if any appropriate citations are provided; reader doubts the validity of much of the material
Professionally or academically legitimate references are generally used; clear and fair citations are presented in most cases; most of the information/content/evidence comes from sources that are reliable
Presents compelling evidence from professionally or academically legitimate sources; attribution is clear and accurate; references are primarily peer-reviewed professional journals or other approved sources
Comments:
...
Introduction to TopicTotal 2.00Distinguished - Clearly explai.docxmariuse18nolet
Â
Introduction to Topic
Total: 2.00
Distinguished - Clearly explains the topic, the importance of further research, ethical implications, and how it clearly relates to oneâs academic and professional pursuits. Thoroughly informs the reader of the rationale behind the topic.
Proficient - Explains the topic, the importance of further research, ethical implications, and how it relates to oneâs academic and professional pursuits. Informs the reader of the rationale behind the topic. Minor details are missing or the relationship to academic and professional pursuits is slightly unclear.
Basic - Somewhat explains the topic, the importance of further research, ethical implications, and how it relates to oneâs academic and professional pursuits. Partially informs the reader of the rationale behind the topic. Relevant details are missing and/or the relationship to academic and professional pursuits is unclear.
Below Expectations - Attempts to explain the topic of the research paper, the importance of further research, ethical implications, and how it relates to oneâs academic and professional pursuits; however, does not inform the reader of the rationale behind the topic, significant details are missing, and the relationship to academic and professional pursuits is entirely unclear.
Non-Performance - The introduction to the research paper topic is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Thesis Statement
Total: 2.00
Distinguished - Provides a developed thesis statement that thoroughly prepares the reader for the content, direction, and purpose of the paper.
Proficient - Provides a thesis statement that prepares the reader for the content, direction, and purpose of the paper. The thesis statement is slightly underdeveloped.
Basic - Provides a limited thesis statement that somewhat prepares the reader for the content, direction, and purpose of the paper. The thesis statement is underdeveloped.
Below Expectations - Attempts to provide a thesis statement; however, it does not prepare the reader for the content, direction, and purpose of the paper. The thesis statement is significantly underdeveloped.
Non-Performance - The thesis statement is either non-existent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Annotated Bibliography
Total: 4.00
Distinguished - Thoroughly summarizes at least five scholarly sources and comprehensively explains how each is relevant to the topic of the Final Research Project. The sources clearly support the thesis statement. Each annotation is at least 150 words in length.
Proficient - Summarizes five scholarly sources and explains how each is relevant to the topic of the Final Research Project. The sources support the thesis statement, and most of the annotations meet the 150 word requirement. Minor details are missing or slightly unclear.
Basic - Summarizes at least five scholarly sources and partially explains how each is relevant to the topic of the Final Resear.
The Literary Analysis EssayEnglish 1302Using the strategies of.docxcherry686017
Â
The Literary Analysis Essay
English 1302
Using the strategies of literary analysis, a writer can discover, develop, and defend his/her stance on a literary analysis issue.
This assignment sheet is a guide and not a contract. I, Mrs. Patricia Carpenter, reserve the right to modify schedules, rubrics, and assignment requirements as necessary to promote the best educational opportunity for each student.
PURPOSE
This assignment allows the student an opportunity to demonstrate the ability to utilize persuasive appeals (logos, pathos, and ethos), rhetorical devices, and writing techniques similar to professional models of literary analysis writing to critically read a literary text and interpret a literary piece to an audience by focusing on one or two figures of speech.
REFERENCES
The College Writer-Chapter 1 & Chapter 16/ The Hodges Harbrace Handbook
Figures of Speech definitionsâamericanrhetoric.com/Figures of Speech PPT
E-campus postings/NLC Writing Center
SCHEDULE--Drafting Phase
First Draft:
You write a first draft identifying one rhetorical devices or one figure of speech in one of the six given texts and develop it as the thesis or focus of your literary analysis. Then you evaluate the draft through peer review and by the Writing Center to ensure that you successfully achieve a close critical reading and write persuasively about the literary text. This is highly recommended. The student will print 1 copy for peer review. First draft is due on Wed, 03/18/15.
Second draft:
You produce a second draft reflecting changes in the first draft from peer review and instructor review. You bring one (1) copy of the second draft to class for peer edit. Second draft is due on Wed, 03/25/15.
Final Drafting Phase
You produce a final draft reflecting editing changes from the second draft. No outside materials or sources are used to write this paper. You turn in the first draft from peer review and the second draft from peer edit plus any drafts from a writing tutor in class or to the instructorâs mailbox in A 310 by 3:00 pm on the final draft due date. You submit the final draft to Insite for a grade. Final draft posted on Insite by 11:30 pm with first and second drafts due to the instructor on Wed, 04/01/15!!!!
FORMAT
You critically read and analyze the given text without consulting outside sources. The paper should be written in MLA page format in a legible 12 point font text. Produce approximately 4-5 typed pages. I do not assess the paper or assign it a grade if it is not submitted to Insite.
TEXTS: POETRYâDickinsonâs âI Dwell in Possibility,â Frostâs âNothing Gold Can Stay,â or Williamsâ âThis is Just to Say.â/ PROSEâPoeâs âTell-Tale Heartâ, Harteâs âThe Outcasts of Poker Flat,â or Fitzgeraldâs âBenediction.â All texts are posted on e-Campus in the Essay #2 Literary Analysis folder.
NLC English Department Literary Studies Paper Rubric
CRITERIA
Excellent
(18-20 points)
Proficient
(16-17 points)
Satisfactory
(1 ...
Research Paper Rubric Component 100 75 50 25 0 .docxaudeleypearl
Â
Research Paper Rubric
Component 100% 75% 50% 25% 0
Basic
Requirements
Formatted correctly, at
least 500 words in
length, citation page
and internal citations
correct (APA format), at
least 2 cited peer
reviewed sources.
Does not meet required
page length, and/or
does not have 2 cited
peer reviewed sources.
Thesis
Statement
Engaging, challenging,
and clearly focuses the
paper. Effectively
stated in the
introduction and
carried throughout the
paper.
Clear and articulate,
engaging and clearly
focuses the paper, but
is not challenging. Is
effectively carried
throughout the paper.
Clearly stated in the
introduction, attempts
to be engaging, is
adequate, but lacks
insight and focus, and is
carried through the
paper.
Included in the
introduction, but is
vague. Lacks insight,
focus, and is not carried
throughout the paper.
Is vague or may be
lacking in the
introduction; is not
focused and lacks
development; is not
carried throughout the
paper.
Introduction Strong and effective, it
is engaging and clearly
defines the thesis, as
well as provides a
foundation for the body
of the paper.
Effective and engaging,
defines the thesis and
provides foundation for
the body of the paper.
Introduces the topic of
the paper and builds a
connection between
the topic, the thesis,
and the body of the
paper. Informative but
not engaging or strong.
Introduces the topic of
the paper loosely and
includes the thesis
statement. Provides
little information
regarding the topic.
Includes little more
than the thesis and
shows no demonstrable
knowledge of the topic
of the paper.
Content
Strongly and vividly
supports the thesis and
is reflective of strong,
thorough research.
Illustrates extensive
knowledge of the topic.
Every aspect of the
thesis is supported by
quality academic
research.
Strongly supports the
thesis and is reflective
of good, thorough
research. Illustrates
knowledge of the topic,
but could be extended.
Most aspects of the
thesis are supported by
quality academic
research.
Supports the thesis and
reflects research, and
illustrates adequate
knowledge of the topic.
Could be extended and
shows some gaps in
understanding of the
topic. Although there
may be some
inconsistencies with
support from quality
academic research.
Related to the thesis
but reflects inadequate
research and
knowledge of the topic,
and demonstrates a
lack of understanding.
There may be a lack of
support from quality
academic research.
Does not convey
adequate
understanding of the
topic, the research, or
the thesis. There are
many unsupported
aspects of the thesis
and the research lacks
quality sources.
Organization Effectively organized.
Logical structure of
points and smooth
transitions convey both
understanding of topic
and care in writing.
Well organized, but
may lack some
transitions between
ideas. Logical structure
...
Argument Position Essay RubricContent 151051 90 total.docxfestockton
Â
Argument Position Essay Rubric
Content
15
10
5
1
90 total
Introduction
Well-developed introduction that engages readers and creates interest. Identifies a compelling, controversial issue/topic
Contains detailed background information on said topic.
Introduction creates interest.
Identifies a controversial issue/topic
Provides some background information.
Needs minor work.
Introduction is adequate, but does not catch the readerâs attention and/or does not clearly set up the purpose of the paper. Needs moderate work.
.
Introduction is inadequate and/or needs major work. Writer does not attempt to create interest. Background details are a random collection of information, unclear, or not related. Introduction is missing.
Thesis Statement
Clear thesis statement that identifies the main reasons that will support the position and direct the reader toward the point of the paper.
Thesis statement is arguable and the writer takes a clear stance.
Clear thesis statement is present, but may be lacking one reason or could be more engaging and/or direct.
Thesis statement is arguable
Thesis is vague and unclear. It requires effort on the part of the reader to discern the point of the paper and the reasons supporting your position.
Thesis is not arguable
Stance is unclear and vague
No thesis present, or thesis is so inadequate that the point of the paper is completely unclear.
Body Paragraphs
Body paragraphs include a topic sentence that connects to thesis and states the main focus of paragraph
Well-developed/relevant examples, details, and evidence.
The writerâs insight, analysis, and/or interpretations are relevant and enhance the explanation of the content.
It is clear and focused, demonstrates original thought/reflection/insight. It holds the readerâs attention.
The paper effectively covers the topic.
Body paragraphs support thesis with examples, details, and evidence
The writerâs insight, analysis, and/or interpretations are relevant and adequately explain the content.
It is reasonably clear and focused, and the writer goes beyond the superficial or obvious. It holds the readerâs attention. On the whole, accurate details or clear thoughts are present to support the main idea (reasons).
. It effectively covers the topic.
Topic Sentences are vague and unclear
Body paragraphs offer adequate support to thesis, but examples, details, and support do not go far enough.
The writerâs insight, analysis, and/or interpretations are present, but does not enhance and/or explain the content or demonstrate thought/reflection/analysis or specifics.
Lacks full development of ideas.
No topic sentences present
Inadequate number of major points/reasons. Body paragraphs inadequately support the thesis, and examples, details, and quotes are significantly underdeveloped.
The writerâs insight, analysis, and/or interpretations are weak, inadequate, or missing.
. It shows no clear sense of purpose and does not reveal reflection. The text reads like a collection of ...
CISC-603 DSL Design Methodology Evaluation Rubric.docx
DSL Design Methodology Evaluation Rubric
Course: CISC 603 Theory of Computation Instructor: Chad Van Chu Date: / /
Student Name:
Methodology Evaluation
Question
Clear and concise problem stated that is testable.
Identifies the question in an unclear manner, but is still testable.
Identifies only part of the question, but is still testable
No clear and concise problem stated .
2
Review of Literatures
You have to find at least 4 related journal/conference articles from e.g., IEEE, ACM, or any
referred journal or conference publication related to your selected domain.
Evidence of 4
Evidence of 3
Evidence of 2 or less
2
Hypothesis
Follows âifâĻthenâĻ becauseâ format.
Is related to the question.
Clearly defines controls vs. variables
Predicts with correct facts.
Evidence of 4
Evidence of 3
Evidence of 2 or less
2
Material
Dataset, Codes, Scripts, etc.
Lists all materials
Lists some materials
Lists some of the materials
Body of Methodology
Data Mining projectâs objectives, tasks, and steps.
Lists all in a sequential order that are not easily followed.
Provides diagrams of all set ups.
Lists all steps in a sequential order that are not easily followed.
.
Provides some diagrams of set ups.
Lists steps in an order that are not sequential, not easily followed, or incomplete.
Provides some diagrams of set ups.
2
Results
All data is recorded and organized in a clear manner. All visible observations are provided.
Complete and correct analysis
of data is provided.
Errors of Experimentation are provided.
All data is recorded and organized in a clear manner. All visible observations are provided.
Analysis of data is provided
with a few errors.
Errors of experimentation are provided.
All data is recorded and organized in a clear manner. Visible observations are missing.
Analysis of data is provided
with a few errors.
Errors of experimentation are provided.
Incorrect data is provided regardless of inclusion or
presentation of all other criteria.
2
Conclusion
Restates the hypothesis, supports or refutes it and explains the role of the test in making the decision
Restates the hypothesis and supports or refutes it
Supports or refutes the hypothesis without restating it
Does not address the hypothesis
2
Clarity of Topic
Includes a clear title which gives specific information about main topic.
Includes a title which gives information about the main topic.
Includes a title that gives some information about the main topic.
Missing a title or statement of the main topic.
2
Details of
Research
Includes all details from research and has clear labels, phrases, or sentence descriptions.
Includes most details from research and has clear labels or phrases.
Includes some details from research and has labels or phrases.
Includes only a few details from research using labels or phrases.
2
Effectiveness
Viewer has a thorough understanding of topic re ...
This presentation was provided by Steph Pollock of The American Psychological Associationâs Journals Program, and Damita Snow, of The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), for the initial session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session One: 'Setting Expectations: a DEIA Primer,' was held June 6, 2024.
How to Add Chatter in the odoo 17 ERP ModuleCeline George
Â
In Odoo, the chatter is like a chat tool that helps you work together on records. You can leave notes and track things, making it easier to talk with your team and partners. Inside chatter, all communication history, activity, and changes will be displayed.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Â
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
A review of the growth of the Israel Genealogy Research Association Database Collection for the last 12 months. Our collection is now passed the 3 million mark and still growing. See which archives have contributed the most. See the different types of records we have, and which years have had records added. You can also see what we have for the future.
This slide is special for master students (MIBS & MIFB) in UUM. Also useful for readers who are interested in the topic of contemporary Islamic banking.
Safalta Digital marketing institute in Noida, provide complete applications that encompass a huge range of virtual advertising and marketing additives, which includes search engine optimization, virtual communication advertising, pay-per-click on marketing, content material advertising, internet analytics, and greater. These university courses are designed for students who possess a comprehensive understanding of virtual marketing strategies and attributes.Safalta Digital Marketing Institute in Noida is a first choice for young individuals or students who are looking to start their careers in the field of digital advertising. The institute gives specialized courses designed and certification.
for beginners, providing thorough training in areas such as SEO, digital communication marketing, and PPC training in Noida. After finishing the program, students receive the certifications recognised by top different universitie, setting a strong foundation for a successful career in digital marketing.
This presentation includes basic of PCOS their pathology and treatment and also Ayurveda correlation of PCOS and Ayurvedic line of treatment mentioned in classics.
it describes the bony anatomy including the femoral head , acetabulum, labrum . also discusses the capsule , ligaments . muscle that act on the hip joint and the range of motion are outlined. factors affecting hip joint stability and weight transmission through the joint are summarized.
1. Essay #5 EWRT 2 Grading Rubric
EESSAY FIVESSAY FIVE:: RRESEARCHESEARCH PPAPERAPER RRUBRICUBRIC
(A) (B) (C) (D) (F)
Thesis clearly stated and
appropriately focused
clearly stated but focus
could have been
sharper
thesis phrasing too simple,
lacks complexity; or, not
clearly worded
thesis lacks a clear
objective and/or does not
âfitâ content of essay
thesis not evident
Supporting
Research
thorough and relevant less thorough but still
substantial and relevant
adequate; relevance made
clear
insufficient; relevance not
always made clear
irrelevant, missing, or
relies on assertion rather
than research
Focus &
Content
sharp, distinct focus;
balanced, substantial,
specific, and/or illustrative
content; sophisticated,
mature ideas are
particularly well-developed
Clear focus; specific,
illustrative, and
balanced content
adequate focus, but
unbalanced content; more
analysis needed
essay contains too much
research information
without analysis or
commentary
absence of focus and
relevant content; content
doesnât âfitâ thesis
Organization obviously controlled
and/or subtle
organization; strong topic
sentences
logical and appropriate
organization; clear topic
sentences
organization attempted, but
unclear or inappropriate
topic sentences
inconsistent organization absence of planned
organization
Style writerâs voice is strong;
precision in tone,
sentence structure, and
word choice
precision and variety in
sentence structure and
word choice
limited, but mostly correct,
sentence structure variety
and word choice
several awkward and/or
unclear sentences;
problems with word
choice
no apparent control over
sentence structure and
word choice
Mechanics &
Usage
free of mechanical and
usage errors
few mechanical and
usage errors
some mechanical and
usage errors, but not
severe enough to interfere
significantly with writerâs
purpose
mechanical and usage
errors which interfere
with writerâs purpose
mechanical and usage
errors that significantly
interfere with the writerâs
purpose
MLA: In-Text
Citations
all sources are accurately
documented in the proper
MLA format
all sources are
documented, but a few
are not in the desired
format
most sources are
documented, but many are
not in the desired format
several sources lack
proper documentation
sources are not
accurately documented,
and MLA format is not
attempted or followed
properly
MLA: Works
Cited Page
all sources on Works Cited
page follow proper MLA
format
most sources on Works Cited page follow proper MLA
format
few of the sources on
Works Cited page follow
proper MLA format
none the sources on
Works Cited page follow
proper MLA format