SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 20
Personnel
Evaluation Systems
December 28, 2012
Why is it important?
• To improve teacher and school administrator
  performance by focusing on what matters
  most in teaching and leadership practices
• The evaluations include multiple indicators
  and web-based tracking and reporting of
  results
BOE Policy on Performance Evaluation
System for Teachers (adopted June 27, 2011)
Purpose:
• To assess classroom teachers in relation to the CNMI
  Public School System “professional teaching standards”
  and to design a plan for professional growth. The
  Performance Evaluation shall be conducted on a yearly
  basis, on the respective classroom teacher’s anniversary
  date.
• The principal or designee will conduct the evaluation
  process in which the teacher will actively participate
  through the use of self-study assessment, reflection,
  presentation of artifacts, and classroom demonstration
Process
1. Training – before participating in the evaluation process,
   all teachers, principals, designated evaluators, and a
   peer evaluation must complete training on the evaluation
   process
2. Orientation – within 3 weeks of a teacher’s first day of
   work in any school year, the principal will provide the
   classroom teacher with a copy of or directions for
   obtaining access to a copy of
   • The Rubric
   • This policy; and
   • A schedule for completing all the components of the evaluation
     process
   • Copies may be provided by electronic means
3. Teacher Self-Assessment shall rate his or her performance at
   the beginning of the year and reflect on his or her performance
   throughout the year
4. Pre-Observation Conference
    • The first observation shall be formal, announced observation;
    • before the first observation, the principal shall meet with the
      teacher to discuss the teacher’s self-assessment based on the
      Rubric for Evaluating CNMI PSS Teachers;
    • the teacher’s most recent professional growth plan, and the
      classroom demonstration observed.
    • The teacher will provide the principal with a written description of
      the lesson (s).
    • The goal of this conference is to prepare the principal for the
      observation.
    • Pre-observation conferences are not required for subsequent
      observations.
5. Observations
   • A formal observation shall last at least an entire class
     period
   • New teachers (0-4 years) – 3 formal observations and
     one peer to peer
   • Seasoned teachers (5 and up) – an evaluation cycle
     for this group of teachers must be developed to
     include one formal observation annually.
   • May adjust the schedule for the summative evaluation
     of a seasoned teacher whenever it is deemed
     necessary; at least 2 observations during the
     employment contract of the teacher
6. Post Observation Conference
•   No later than ten days after the observation
•   Shall discuss the document on the Rubric, the strengths and
    weaknesses of the teacher’s performance during the observed
    lesson
7. Summary Evaluation Conference and Scoring the
    Teacher Summary Rating Form
•   Shall be done prior to the end of the school year and in accordance
    with the timelines
•   shall discuss the teacher’s self-assessment, the teachers’ most
    recent Professional Growth Plan, the components of the CNMI
    PSS Teacher Evaluation Process completed during the year,
    classroom observations, artifacts submitted or collected during the
    evaluation process and other evidence of the teacher’s
    performance on the Rubric
Conclusion
• Give a rating for each Element in the Rubrics
• Make a written comment on any Element marked “non
  demonstrated”
• Give an overall rating of each Standard in the Rubric
• Provide the teacher with the opportunity to add comments to the
  Teacher Summary Rating Form
• Review the completed Teacher Summary Rating Form with the
  teacher
• Secure the teacher’s signature on the Record of Teacher
  Evaluation Activities and Teacher Summary Rating Form
• Submit the completed evaluation form to Human Resource
  Office.
• The completed Teacher Evaluation Rating forms and justification
  for renewal are to be attached to employment contract renewals
  for all teachers.
Three Types of Growth Plans
Individual Growth Plans:
• Is rated “Proficient” on all the Standards on the Teacher Summary
  Rating Form
Monitored Growth Plans
• Is rated “Developing” on one or more Standards on the Teacher
  Summary Rating Form and he or she;
• Is not recommended for dismissal or nonrenewal
• a timeline which allows the teacher one school year to achieve
  proficiency
Directed Growth Plans
• Is rated “not demonstrated” on any standard on the teacher
  summary rating form; or
• “developing” on one of more standards on the teacher summary
  rating form for two consecutive years; and
• Is not recommended for dismissal or non-renewal
• a timeline for achieving proficiency within one school year
Evaluation System-
School Administrators
BOE Policy on Performance Evaluation
System for School Administrators
(adopted June 27, 2011)

Purpose:
• To assess school administrators in relation to the CNMI
  Public School System “professional teaching standards
  and school administrator leadership standards” and to
  design a plan for professional growth. The Performance
  Evaluation shall be conducted on a yearly basis, on the
  respective School Administrator’s anniversary date.
• The Commissioner of Education or designee will conduct
  the performance evaluation process in which the
  principal will actively participate through the use of self-
  study assessment, reflection, presentation of artifacts,
  and supervisory and administrative performance
  requirements.
Process
1. Training – before participating in the evaluation process,
   all principals and peer evaluators must complete training
   on the evaluation process
2. Orientation – within 6 weeks of the principal’s first day of
   work in any school year, the Commissioner of Education
   or designee will provide the school administrator with a
   copy of or directions for obtaining access to a copy of
    • The Rubric
    • This policy
    • A schedule for completing all the components of the
       evaluation process
    • Copies may be provided by electronic means
3. School Administrator Self-Assessment –Administrator shall
   rate his or her own performance at the beginning of the year and
   reflect on his or her performance throughout the year
4. Pre-Observation Conference
• The first observation shall be a formal and announced observation
• before the first observation, the Commissioner shall meet with the
  principal to discuss the principal’s self assessment based on the
  Rubric for Evaluating CNMI PSS School Administrators;
• the school principals’ most recent professional growth plan, and the
  supervisory and administrative performance observed.
• The school principal will provide the Commissioner of Education
  with a written description of the supervisory and administrative
  performance activities.
• The goal of this conference is to prepare the COE for the
  observation.
• Pre-observation conferences are not required for subsequent
  observations.
5. Observations
   • A formal observation shall last at least 2 hours
   • New school administrators (0-4) – 3 formal observations and
     one peer to peer observation to be performed annually
   • Seasoned school administrators (5 and up) – an evaluation
     cycle for this group of school administrators. The schedule may
     be adjusted for the summative evaluation of a seasoned school
     administration whenever it is deemed necessary; at least 3
     observations are required during 2 year employment contract.
6. Post Observation Conference –
   • shall be conducted no later than ten days after the observation.
   • shall discuss the document on the Rubric, the strengths and
     weaknesses of the principal’s performance during the observed
     principal performance
7. Summary Evaluation Conference and Scoring
  the School Administrator Summary Rating Form
• Shall be done prior to the end of the school year and in
  accordance with the timelines
• shall discuss the principal’s self-assessment, the
  principals’ most recent Professional Growth Plan, the
  components of the CNMI PSS School Administrator
  Evaluation Process completed during the year,
  supervisory and administrative activities observations,
  artifacts submitted or collected during the evaluation
  process and other evidence of the principal’s
  performance on the Rubric
Conclusion
• Give a rating for each Element in the Rubrics
• Make a written comment on any Element marked “non
  demonstrated”
• Give an overall rating of each Standard in the Rubric
• Provide the teacher with the opportunity to add comments to the
  School Administrator Summary Rating Form
• Review the completed School Administrator Summary Rating Form
  with the Principal; and
• Secure the principal’s signature on the Record of School
  Administrator Evaluation Activities and Principal Summary Rating
  Form
• Submit the completed evaluation form to Human Resource Office.
• The completed School Administrator Evaluation Rating forms and
  justification for renewal are to be attached to employment contract
  renewals for all principals.
Three Types of Growth Plans
Individual Growth Plans:
• Is rated “Proficient” on all the Standards on the School Administrator
  Summary Rating Form
Monitored Growth Plans
• Is rated “Developing” on one or more Standards on the School
  Administrator Summary Rating Form and he or she;
• Is not recommended for dismissal or nonrenewal
• a timeline which allows the principal one school year to achieve
  proficiency
Directed Growth Plans
• Is rated “not demonstrated” on any standard on the School
  Administrator summary rating form; or
• “developing” on one of more standards on the School Administrator
  summary rating form for two consecutive years; and
• Is not recommended for dismissal or non-renewal
• a timeline for achieving proficiency within one school year
McRel Website
https://mxweb3.media-x.com/home/cnmipss/

Username: your employee number
Password: 123456 (default password)

Who can I contact if I have questions?
customercare@mcrel.org

FAQs is available at the mxweb website.

Webinars can be scheduled for training.
Data Report-Classroom Teachers
School Year 2011-2012
236 observations
302 evaluations attempted but only 64 evaluations
  completed

School Year 2012-2013
26 observations
2 evaluations completed

****All evaluations should be inputted by the end of the
   school year.
What are the challenges in
 completing the evaluation
 systems?

More Related Content

What's hot

Rubrics for IPCRF of Teachers per Objective of their KRAs
Rubrics for IPCRF of Teachers per Objective of their KRAsRubrics for IPCRF of Teachers per Objective of their KRAs
Rubrics for IPCRF of Teachers per Objective of their KRAsDIEGO Pomarca
 
Individual performance commitment_and_review_form_(ipcrf)_for_teachers
Individual performance commitment_and_review_form_(ipcrf)_for_teachersIndividual performance commitment_and_review_form_(ipcrf)_for_teachers
Individual performance commitment_and_review_form_(ipcrf)_for_teacherstitserchriz Gaid
 
Individual performance commitment and review form
Individual performance commitment and review formIndividual performance commitment and review form
Individual performance commitment and review formDeped Tagum City
 
IPCF Portfolio 2021-2022
IPCF Portfolio 2021-2022IPCF Portfolio 2021-2022
IPCF Portfolio 2021-2022Gie Escoto
 
Print form 184
Print form 184Print form 184
Print form 184Angie Long
 
RPMS for DepEd Employees
RPMS for DepEd EmployeesRPMS for DepEd Employees
RPMS for DepEd EmployeesNoel Ortega
 
Results based performance management system rpms- for dep ed
Results based performance management system  rpms- for dep edResults based performance management system  rpms- for dep ed
Results based performance management system rpms- for dep edNoel Grey
 
10.21.14 Steven Virgadamo - Presents a School Leader Evaluation Process
10.21.14 Steven Virgadamo - Presents a School Leader Evaluation Process10.21.14 Steven Virgadamo - Presents a School Leader Evaluation Process
10.21.14 Steven Virgadamo - Presents a School Leader Evaluation ProcessSteven Virgadamo
 
Individual performance commitment and review form for regular teachers
Individual performance commitment and review form for regular teachersIndividual performance commitment and review form for regular teachers
Individual performance commitment and review form for regular teachersRai Blanquera
 
My individual performance-commitment-and-review-form- 3
My individual performance-commitment-and-review-form- 3My individual performance-commitment-and-review-form- 3
My individual performance-commitment-and-review-form- 3Carie Justine Estrellado
 
Accomplishement JOURNAL RPMS
Accomplishement JOURNAL RPMSAccomplishement JOURNAL RPMS
Accomplishement JOURNAL RPMSDeped Tagum City
 
CPD 14 february, 2020
CPD 14 february, 2020CPD 14 february, 2020
CPD 14 february, 2020RobertMhango3
 

What's hot (20)

Employee's manual
Employee's manualEmployee's manual
Employee's manual
 
Rubrics for IPCRF of Teachers per Objective of their KRAs
Rubrics for IPCRF of Teachers per Objective of their KRAsRubrics for IPCRF of Teachers per Objective of their KRAs
Rubrics for IPCRF of Teachers per Objective of their KRAs
 
IPCRF
IPCRFIPCRF
IPCRF
 
Individual performance commitment_and_review_form_(ipcrf)_for_teachers
Individual performance commitment_and_review_form_(ipcrf)_for_teachersIndividual performance commitment_and_review_form_(ipcrf)_for_teachers
Individual performance commitment_and_review_form_(ipcrf)_for_teachers
 
Individual performance commitment and review form
Individual performance commitment and review formIndividual performance commitment and review form
Individual performance commitment and review form
 
IPCF Portfolio 2021-2022
IPCF Portfolio 2021-2022IPCF Portfolio 2021-2022
IPCF Portfolio 2021-2022
 
Nap ipcrf sample
Nap ipcrf sampleNap ipcrf sample
Nap ipcrf sample
 
Print form 184
Print form 184Print form 184
Print form 184
 
Ipcrf superior
Ipcrf superiorIpcrf superior
Ipcrf superior
 
Educational planning models
Educational planning modelsEducational planning models
Educational planning models
 
RPMS for DepEd Employees
RPMS for DepEd EmployeesRPMS for DepEd Employees
RPMS for DepEd Employees
 
Results based performance management system rpms- for dep ed
Results based performance management system  rpms- for dep edResults based performance management system  rpms- for dep ed
Results based performance management system rpms- for dep ed
 
10.21.14 Steven Virgadamo - Presents a School Leader Evaluation Process
10.21.14 Steven Virgadamo - Presents a School Leader Evaluation Process10.21.14 Steven Virgadamo - Presents a School Leader Evaluation Process
10.21.14 Steven Virgadamo - Presents a School Leader Evaluation Process
 
Individual performance commitment and review form for regular teachers
Individual performance commitment and review form for regular teachersIndividual performance commitment and review form for regular teachers
Individual performance commitment and review form for regular teachers
 
My individual performance-commitment-and-review-form- 3
My individual performance-commitment-and-review-form- 3My individual performance-commitment-and-review-form- 3
My individual performance-commitment-and-review-form- 3
 
RPMS Process
RPMS ProcessRPMS Process
RPMS Process
 
Accomplishement JOURNAL RPMS
Accomplishement JOURNAL RPMSAccomplishement JOURNAL RPMS
Accomplishement JOURNAL RPMS
 
Ipcrf 2016 hinabay
Ipcrf 2016 hinabayIpcrf 2016 hinabay
Ipcrf 2016 hinabay
 
3. Design a Training Event
3. Design a Training Event3. Design a Training Event
3. Design a Training Event
 
CPD 14 february, 2020
CPD 14 february, 2020CPD 14 february, 2020
CPD 14 february, 2020
 

Viewers also liked

Oil Technics Ltd:Absorbents Brochure.
Oil Technics Ltd:Absorbents Brochure.Oil Technics Ltd:Absorbents Brochure.
Oil Technics Ltd:Absorbents Brochure.David Holmes
 
Oil Technics Ltd: AFFF-LF Fire Fighting Foam
Oil Technics Ltd: AFFF-LF Fire Fighting FoamOil Technics Ltd: AFFF-LF Fire Fighting Foam
Oil Technics Ltd: AFFF-LF Fire Fighting FoamDavid Holmes
 
Oil Technics Ltd: Bioremediation Products
Oil Technics Ltd: Bioremediation ProductsOil Technics Ltd: Bioremediation Products
Oil Technics Ltd: Bioremediation ProductsDavid Holmes
 
2. How does your media product represent particular social groups?
2. How does your media product represent particular social groups?2. How does your media product represent particular social groups?
2. How does your media product represent particular social groups?07willcox-smithtay
 
Btec level 3 ass 1 u4 5 and 62
Btec level 3 ass 1 u4 5 and 62Btec level 3 ass 1 u4 5 and 62
Btec level 3 ass 1 u4 5 and 62BenT1990
 
Awsp framework version_2.0
Awsp framework version_2.0Awsp framework version_2.0
Awsp framework version_2.0ailenebaxter
 
Information Technology Curriculum
Information Technology CurriculumInformation Technology Curriculum
Information Technology Curriculumguest8097d3
 
Personnel administrator performance appraisal
Personnel administrator performance appraisalPersonnel administrator performance appraisal
Personnel administrator performance appraisalMichealOwen666
 
Faculty Development Social Media Communications
Faculty Development Social Media CommunicationsFaculty Development Social Media Communications
Faculty Development Social Media CommunicationsJason Rhode
 
The importance of staff development days
The importance of staff development daysThe importance of staff development days
The importance of staff development daysPrindi04
 
Staff Development Thesis
Staff Development ThesisStaff Development Thesis
Staff Development ThesisCraig Nansen
 
Capstone_Defense_August_2
Capstone_Defense_August_2Capstone_Defense_August_2
Capstone_Defense_August_2Debbie Powers
 
Teaching and Learning Theories for Instructional Development
Teaching and Learning Theories for Instructional DevelopmentTeaching and Learning Theories for Instructional Development
Teaching and Learning Theories for Instructional DevelopmentPrachyanun Nilsook
 
School development plan
School development planSchool development plan
School development plantosatheesh
 
Instructional Development STaR Chart Week 2 Staff Development
Instructional Development STaR Chart Week 2 Staff DevelopmentInstructional Development STaR Chart Week 2 Staff Development
Instructional Development STaR Chart Week 2 Staff Developmentlindywelborn
 
Bite-Sized Staff Training: Transform Staff Development for Busy Employees
Bite-Sized Staff Training: Transform Staff Development for Busy EmployeesBite-Sized Staff Training: Transform Staff Development for Busy Employees
Bite-Sized Staff Training: Transform Staff Development for Busy EmployeesJulia Huprich
 
School Principal: Job Description
School Principal:  Job DescriptionSchool Principal:  Job Description
School Principal: Job DescriptionStacy Leckler
 

Viewers also liked (20)

It fascisme slideshare
It fascisme slideshareIt fascisme slideshare
It fascisme slideshare
 
Oil Technics Ltd:Absorbents Brochure.
Oil Technics Ltd:Absorbents Brochure.Oil Technics Ltd:Absorbents Brochure.
Oil Technics Ltd:Absorbents Brochure.
 
Oil Technics Ltd: AFFF-LF Fire Fighting Foam
Oil Technics Ltd: AFFF-LF Fire Fighting FoamOil Technics Ltd: AFFF-LF Fire Fighting Foam
Oil Technics Ltd: AFFF-LF Fire Fighting Foam
 
Oil Technics Ltd: Bioremediation Products
Oil Technics Ltd: Bioremediation ProductsOil Technics Ltd: Bioremediation Products
Oil Technics Ltd: Bioremediation Products
 
2. How does your media product represent particular social groups?
2. How does your media product represent particular social groups?2. How does your media product represent particular social groups?
2. How does your media product represent particular social groups?
 
Btec level 3 ass 1 u4 5 and 62
Btec level 3 ass 1 u4 5 and 62Btec level 3 ass 1 u4 5 and 62
Btec level 3 ass 1 u4 5 and 62
 
Awsp framework version_2.0
Awsp framework version_2.0Awsp framework version_2.0
Awsp framework version_2.0
 
Information Technology Curriculum
Information Technology CurriculumInformation Technology Curriculum
Information Technology Curriculum
 
Personnel administrator performance appraisal
Personnel administrator performance appraisalPersonnel administrator performance appraisal
Personnel administrator performance appraisal
 
Chap10
Chap10Chap10
Chap10
 
Faculty Development Social Media Communications
Faculty Development Social Media CommunicationsFaculty Development Social Media Communications
Faculty Development Social Media Communications
 
The importance of staff development days
The importance of staff development daysThe importance of staff development days
The importance of staff development days
 
Staff Development Thesis
Staff Development ThesisStaff Development Thesis
Staff Development Thesis
 
Capstone_Defense_August_2
Capstone_Defense_August_2Capstone_Defense_August_2
Capstone_Defense_August_2
 
Teaching and Learning Theories for Instructional Development
Teaching and Learning Theories for Instructional DevelopmentTeaching and Learning Theories for Instructional Development
Teaching and Learning Theories for Instructional Development
 
School development plan
School development planSchool development plan
School development plan
 
Instructional Development STaR Chart Week 2 Staff Development
Instructional Development STaR Chart Week 2 Staff DevelopmentInstructional Development STaR Chart Week 2 Staff Development
Instructional Development STaR Chart Week 2 Staff Development
 
Bite-Sized Staff Training: Transform Staff Development for Busy Employees
Bite-Sized Staff Training: Transform Staff Development for Busy EmployeesBite-Sized Staff Training: Transform Staff Development for Busy Employees
Bite-Sized Staff Training: Transform Staff Development for Busy Employees
 
Staff development
Staff developmentStaff development
Staff development
 
School Principal: Job Description
School Principal:  Job DescriptionSchool Principal:  Job Description
School Principal: Job Description
 

Similar to Evaluation system presentation12 28-12

TEACHER_PERFORMANCE_APRAISAL_GOOD_(TPA)maun_Autosaved.pptx
TEACHER_PERFORMANCE_APRAISAL_GOOD_(TPA)maun_Autosaved.pptxTEACHER_PERFORMANCE_APRAISAL_GOOD_(TPA)maun_Autosaved.pptx
TEACHER_PERFORMANCE_APRAISAL_GOOD_(TPA)maun_Autosaved.pptxDanZulu1
 
Process-of-Conducting-Instructional-Supervision-with-the-Use.pptx
Process-of-Conducting-Instructional-Supervision-with-the-Use.pptxProcess-of-Conducting-Instructional-Supervision-with-the-Use.pptx
Process-of-Conducting-Instructional-Supervision-with-the-Use.pptxLouAlo2
 
Staff meeting 17th june
Staff meeting 17th juneStaff meeting 17th june
Staff meeting 17th juneEd Brodhurst
 
Revised introduction to ee power point
Revised introduction to ee power pointRevised introduction to ee power point
Revised introduction to ee power pointmbanios
 
Examination Reform Reports
Examination Reform ReportsExamination Reform Reports
Examination Reform ReportsS. Raj Kumar
 
Summative and Formative Assessments1.ppt
Summative and Formative Assessments1.pptSummative and Formative Assessments1.ppt
Summative and Formative Assessments1.pptNurislamiyah7
 
Summative and Formative Assessments.ppt
Summative and Formative Assessments.pptSummative and Formative Assessments.ppt
Summative and Formative Assessments.pptAtuhaireAnnah
 
week 1-Summative and Formative Assessments 1.ppt
week 1-Summative and Formative Assessments 1.pptweek 1-Summative and Formative Assessments 1.ppt
week 1-Summative and Formative Assessments 1.pptjason322724
 
Assessing_Student_Learning_Outcomes3_1.ppt
Assessing_Student_Learning_Outcomes3_1.pptAssessing_Student_Learning_Outcomes3_1.ppt
Assessing_Student_Learning_Outcomes3_1.pptsalvegimenez1
 
PPT EVALUATION STRATEGIES IN CURRICULUM.pptx
PPT EVALUATION STRATEGIES IN CURRICULUM.pptxPPT EVALUATION STRATEGIES IN CURRICULUM.pptx
PPT EVALUATION STRATEGIES IN CURRICULUM.pptxSANCHAYEETA2
 
Unit 7 assessment in higher education
Unit 7 assessment in higher educationUnit 7 assessment in higher education
Unit 7 assessment in higher educationAsima shahzadi
 
Tuning process in education
Tuning process in educationTuning process in education
Tuning process in educationsadianaz23
 
Observation of Teaching and Learning Procedure for Internal Staff
Observation of Teaching and Learning Procedure for Internal StaffObservation of Teaching and Learning Procedure for Internal Staff
Observation of Teaching and Learning Procedure for Internal StaffThe Pathway Group
 
Rubrics & Skill Upgradation in Computer Engineering.pptx
Rubrics & Skill Upgradation in Computer Engineering.pptxRubrics & Skill Upgradation in Computer Engineering.pptx
Rubrics & Skill Upgradation in Computer Engineering.pptxSrikanth Sri
 

Similar to Evaluation system presentation12 28-12 (20)

TEACHER_PERFORMANCE_APRAISAL_GOOD_(TPA)maun_Autosaved.pptx
TEACHER_PERFORMANCE_APRAISAL_GOOD_(TPA)maun_Autosaved.pptxTEACHER_PERFORMANCE_APRAISAL_GOOD_(TPA)maun_Autosaved.pptx
TEACHER_PERFORMANCE_APRAISAL_GOOD_(TPA)maun_Autosaved.pptx
 
Process-of-Conducting-Instructional-Supervision-with-the-Use.pptx
Process-of-Conducting-Instructional-Supervision-with-the-Use.pptxProcess-of-Conducting-Instructional-Supervision-with-the-Use.pptx
Process-of-Conducting-Instructional-Supervision-with-the-Use.pptx
 
NC Teacher Evaluation
NC Teacher EvaluationNC Teacher Evaluation
NC Teacher Evaluation
 
Staff meeting 17th june
Staff meeting 17th juneStaff meeting 17th june
Staff meeting 17th june
 
HDP_PPT.pptx
HDP_PPT.pptxHDP_PPT.pptx
HDP_PPT.pptx
 
Revised introduction to ee power point
Revised introduction to ee power pointRevised introduction to ee power point
Revised introduction to ee power point
 
Examination Reform Reports
Examination Reform ReportsExamination Reform Reports
Examination Reform Reports
 
EXAMINATION REFORM REPORTS
EXAMINATION REFORM REPORTSEXAMINATION REFORM REPORTS
EXAMINATION REFORM REPORTS
 
Evaluation
EvaluationEvaluation
Evaluation
 
Summative and Formative Assessments1.ppt
Summative and Formative Assessments1.pptSummative and Formative Assessments1.ppt
Summative and Formative Assessments1.ppt
 
Summative and Formative Assessments.ppt
Summative and Formative Assessments.pptSummative and Formative Assessments.ppt
Summative and Formative Assessments.ppt
 
week 1-Summative and Formative Assessments 1.ppt
week 1-Summative and Formative Assessments 1.pptweek 1-Summative and Formative Assessments 1.ppt
week 1-Summative and Formative Assessments 1.ppt
 
Assessing_Student_Learning_Outcomes3_1.ppt
Assessing_Student_Learning_Outcomes3_1.pptAssessing_Student_Learning_Outcomes3_1.ppt
Assessing_Student_Learning_Outcomes3_1.ppt
 
PPT EVALUATION STRATEGIES IN CURRICULUM.pptx
PPT EVALUATION STRATEGIES IN CURRICULUM.pptxPPT EVALUATION STRATEGIES IN CURRICULUM.pptx
PPT EVALUATION STRATEGIES IN CURRICULUM.pptx
 
Unit 7 assessment in higher education
Unit 7 assessment in higher educationUnit 7 assessment in higher education
Unit 7 assessment in higher education
 
Teachers evaluation system
Teachers evaluation systemTeachers evaluation system
Teachers evaluation system
 
Tuning process in education
Tuning process in educationTuning process in education
Tuning process in education
 
Observation of Teaching and Learning Procedure for Internal Staff
Observation of Teaching and Learning Procedure for Internal StaffObservation of Teaching and Learning Procedure for Internal Staff
Observation of Teaching and Learning Procedure for Internal Staff
 
Rubrics & Skill Upgradation in Computer Engineering.pptx
Rubrics & Skill Upgradation in Computer Engineering.pptxRubrics & Skill Upgradation in Computer Engineering.pptx
Rubrics & Skill Upgradation in Computer Engineering.pptx
 
Assessment in economics
Assessment in economicsAssessment in economics
Assessment in economics
 

More from dionnesantos

3rd Quarter Writing Project
3rd Quarter Writing Project3rd Quarter Writing Project
3rd Quarter Writing Projectdionnesantos
 
Energy being converted
Energy being convertedEnergy being converted
Energy being converteddionnesantos
 
Different forms of energy
Different forms of energyDifferent forms of energy
Different forms of energydionnesantos
 
Forms of energy floicia & pia
Forms of energy   floicia & piaForms of energy   floicia & pia
Forms of energy floicia & piadionnesantos
 
Forms of energy_2013
Forms of energy_2013Forms of energy_2013
Forms of energy_2013dionnesantos
 
Observations vs-inferences2071
Observations vs-inferences2071Observations vs-inferences2071
Observations vs-inferences2071dionnesantos
 
Using technology with citw state level pd-oct. 9
Using technology with citw state level pd-oct. 9Using technology with citw state level pd-oct. 9
Using technology with citw state level pd-oct. 9dionnesantos
 
Colts staff meeting 8 27-12
Colts staff meeting 8 27-12Colts staff meeting 8 27-12
Colts staff meeting 8 27-12dionnesantos
 
Meeting your e teacher presentation
Meeting your e teacher presentationMeeting your e teacher presentation
Meeting your e teacher presentationdionnesantos
 

More from dionnesantos (9)

3rd Quarter Writing Project
3rd Quarter Writing Project3rd Quarter Writing Project
3rd Quarter Writing Project
 
Energy being converted
Energy being convertedEnergy being converted
Energy being converted
 
Different forms of energy
Different forms of energyDifferent forms of energy
Different forms of energy
 
Forms of energy floicia & pia
Forms of energy   floicia & piaForms of energy   floicia & pia
Forms of energy floicia & pia
 
Forms of energy_2013
Forms of energy_2013Forms of energy_2013
Forms of energy_2013
 
Observations vs-inferences2071
Observations vs-inferences2071Observations vs-inferences2071
Observations vs-inferences2071
 
Using technology with citw state level pd-oct. 9
Using technology with citw state level pd-oct. 9Using technology with citw state level pd-oct. 9
Using technology with citw state level pd-oct. 9
 
Colts staff meeting 8 27-12
Colts staff meeting 8 27-12Colts staff meeting 8 27-12
Colts staff meeting 8 27-12
 
Meeting your e teacher presentation
Meeting your e teacher presentationMeeting your e teacher presentation
Meeting your e teacher presentation
 

Evaluation system presentation12 28-12

  • 2. Why is it important? • To improve teacher and school administrator performance by focusing on what matters most in teaching and leadership practices • The evaluations include multiple indicators and web-based tracking and reporting of results
  • 3. BOE Policy on Performance Evaluation System for Teachers (adopted June 27, 2011) Purpose: • To assess classroom teachers in relation to the CNMI Public School System “professional teaching standards” and to design a plan for professional growth. The Performance Evaluation shall be conducted on a yearly basis, on the respective classroom teacher’s anniversary date. • The principal or designee will conduct the evaluation process in which the teacher will actively participate through the use of self-study assessment, reflection, presentation of artifacts, and classroom demonstration
  • 4. Process 1. Training – before participating in the evaluation process, all teachers, principals, designated evaluators, and a peer evaluation must complete training on the evaluation process 2. Orientation – within 3 weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide the classroom teacher with a copy of or directions for obtaining access to a copy of • The Rubric • This policy; and • A schedule for completing all the components of the evaluation process • Copies may be provided by electronic means
  • 5. 3. Teacher Self-Assessment shall rate his or her performance at the beginning of the year and reflect on his or her performance throughout the year 4. Pre-Observation Conference • The first observation shall be formal, announced observation; • before the first observation, the principal shall meet with the teacher to discuss the teacher’s self-assessment based on the Rubric for Evaluating CNMI PSS Teachers; • the teacher’s most recent professional growth plan, and the classroom demonstration observed. • The teacher will provide the principal with a written description of the lesson (s). • The goal of this conference is to prepare the principal for the observation. • Pre-observation conferences are not required for subsequent observations.
  • 6. 5. Observations • A formal observation shall last at least an entire class period • New teachers (0-4 years) – 3 formal observations and one peer to peer • Seasoned teachers (5 and up) – an evaluation cycle for this group of teachers must be developed to include one formal observation annually. • May adjust the schedule for the summative evaluation of a seasoned teacher whenever it is deemed necessary; at least 2 observations during the employment contract of the teacher
  • 7. 6. Post Observation Conference • No later than ten days after the observation • Shall discuss the document on the Rubric, the strengths and weaknesses of the teacher’s performance during the observed lesson 7. Summary Evaluation Conference and Scoring the Teacher Summary Rating Form • Shall be done prior to the end of the school year and in accordance with the timelines • shall discuss the teacher’s self-assessment, the teachers’ most recent Professional Growth Plan, the components of the CNMI PSS Teacher Evaluation Process completed during the year, classroom observations, artifacts submitted or collected during the evaluation process and other evidence of the teacher’s performance on the Rubric
  • 8. Conclusion • Give a rating for each Element in the Rubrics • Make a written comment on any Element marked “non demonstrated” • Give an overall rating of each Standard in the Rubric • Provide the teacher with the opportunity to add comments to the Teacher Summary Rating Form • Review the completed Teacher Summary Rating Form with the teacher • Secure the teacher’s signature on the Record of Teacher Evaluation Activities and Teacher Summary Rating Form • Submit the completed evaluation form to Human Resource Office. • The completed Teacher Evaluation Rating forms and justification for renewal are to be attached to employment contract renewals for all teachers.
  • 9. Three Types of Growth Plans Individual Growth Plans: • Is rated “Proficient” on all the Standards on the Teacher Summary Rating Form Monitored Growth Plans • Is rated “Developing” on one or more Standards on the Teacher Summary Rating Form and he or she; • Is not recommended for dismissal or nonrenewal • a timeline which allows the teacher one school year to achieve proficiency Directed Growth Plans • Is rated “not demonstrated” on any standard on the teacher summary rating form; or • “developing” on one of more standards on the teacher summary rating form for two consecutive years; and • Is not recommended for dismissal or non-renewal • a timeline for achieving proficiency within one school year
  • 11. BOE Policy on Performance Evaluation System for School Administrators (adopted June 27, 2011) Purpose: • To assess school administrators in relation to the CNMI Public School System “professional teaching standards and school administrator leadership standards” and to design a plan for professional growth. The Performance Evaluation shall be conducted on a yearly basis, on the respective School Administrator’s anniversary date. • The Commissioner of Education or designee will conduct the performance evaluation process in which the principal will actively participate through the use of self- study assessment, reflection, presentation of artifacts, and supervisory and administrative performance requirements.
  • 12. Process 1. Training – before participating in the evaluation process, all principals and peer evaluators must complete training on the evaluation process 2. Orientation – within 6 weeks of the principal’s first day of work in any school year, the Commissioner of Education or designee will provide the school administrator with a copy of or directions for obtaining access to a copy of • The Rubric • This policy • A schedule for completing all the components of the evaluation process • Copies may be provided by electronic means
  • 13. 3. School Administrator Self-Assessment –Administrator shall rate his or her own performance at the beginning of the year and reflect on his or her performance throughout the year 4. Pre-Observation Conference • The first observation shall be a formal and announced observation • before the first observation, the Commissioner shall meet with the principal to discuss the principal’s self assessment based on the Rubric for Evaluating CNMI PSS School Administrators; • the school principals’ most recent professional growth plan, and the supervisory and administrative performance observed. • The school principal will provide the Commissioner of Education with a written description of the supervisory and administrative performance activities. • The goal of this conference is to prepare the COE for the observation. • Pre-observation conferences are not required for subsequent observations.
  • 14. 5. Observations • A formal observation shall last at least 2 hours • New school administrators (0-4) – 3 formal observations and one peer to peer observation to be performed annually • Seasoned school administrators (5 and up) – an evaluation cycle for this group of school administrators. The schedule may be adjusted for the summative evaluation of a seasoned school administration whenever it is deemed necessary; at least 3 observations are required during 2 year employment contract. 6. Post Observation Conference – • shall be conducted no later than ten days after the observation. • shall discuss the document on the Rubric, the strengths and weaknesses of the principal’s performance during the observed principal performance
  • 15. 7. Summary Evaluation Conference and Scoring the School Administrator Summary Rating Form • Shall be done prior to the end of the school year and in accordance with the timelines • shall discuss the principal’s self-assessment, the principals’ most recent Professional Growth Plan, the components of the CNMI PSS School Administrator Evaluation Process completed during the year, supervisory and administrative activities observations, artifacts submitted or collected during the evaluation process and other evidence of the principal’s performance on the Rubric
  • 16. Conclusion • Give a rating for each Element in the Rubrics • Make a written comment on any Element marked “non demonstrated” • Give an overall rating of each Standard in the Rubric • Provide the teacher with the opportunity to add comments to the School Administrator Summary Rating Form • Review the completed School Administrator Summary Rating Form with the Principal; and • Secure the principal’s signature on the Record of School Administrator Evaluation Activities and Principal Summary Rating Form • Submit the completed evaluation form to Human Resource Office. • The completed School Administrator Evaluation Rating forms and justification for renewal are to be attached to employment contract renewals for all principals.
  • 17. Three Types of Growth Plans Individual Growth Plans: • Is rated “Proficient” on all the Standards on the School Administrator Summary Rating Form Monitored Growth Plans • Is rated “Developing” on one or more Standards on the School Administrator Summary Rating Form and he or she; • Is not recommended for dismissal or nonrenewal • a timeline which allows the principal one school year to achieve proficiency Directed Growth Plans • Is rated “not demonstrated” on any standard on the School Administrator summary rating form; or • “developing” on one of more standards on the School Administrator summary rating form for two consecutive years; and • Is not recommended for dismissal or non-renewal • a timeline for achieving proficiency within one school year
  • 18. McRel Website https://mxweb3.media-x.com/home/cnmipss/ Username: your employee number Password: 123456 (default password) Who can I contact if I have questions? customercare@mcrel.org FAQs is available at the mxweb website. Webinars can be scheduled for training.
  • 19. Data Report-Classroom Teachers School Year 2011-2012 236 observations 302 evaluations attempted but only 64 evaluations completed School Year 2012-2013 26 observations 2 evaluations completed ****All evaluations should be inputted by the end of the school year.
  • 20. What are the challenges in completing the evaluation systems?

Editor's Notes

  1. Policy on Evaluation System on the PSS website under BOE.