The document discusses Carl Jung's theory of psychological types, which categorizes people into four dimensions based on how they perceive and judge information. It describes the four dimensions as sensing vs intuition for perception and thinking vs feeling for judgment. People's predominant dimensions can indicate their learning style, including mastery, understanding, interpersonal, and self-expressive styles. The document provides examples matching types of intelligence and careers to different learning styles.
1) Cheating involves getting unauthorized help on assignments, quizzes or exams, while plagiarism is presenting another's work or ideas as your own.
2) There are different types of plagiarism, including failure to cite sources, failure to use quotation marks, and patchwriting (using sections of copied text without citations).
3) Plagiarism can be unintentional through poor citation or failure to use quotation marks, or intentional through directly copying or buying papers.
This document discusses motivation and goal setting. It defines motivation and explains that goals should be specific, measurable, achievable, realistic and time-bound (SMART). Some key steps in achieving goals are breaking them down into smaller, more manageable objectives. An example is given of the development of Concorde over many years through the work of scientists like Newton and engineers achieving objectives along the way. The importance of learning from failures and others' work is also discussed.
This document introduces the PROMPT test for evaluating information. The PROMPT test examines the Presentation, Relevance, Objectivity, Method, Provenance, and Timeliness of information. It discusses assessing each element, such as considering the balance of evidence for objectivity and who produced the information and why for provenance. The document recommends using the PROMPT test's criteria to help determine how useful or credible a piece of information may be.
This document discusses the history and evolution of communication. It explores how communication has changed from the Middle Ages to the present day, moving from oral communication to written texts to digital communication online. Examples are provided of communication methods from different historical periods, showing how communication technologies have advanced over time. The document also briefly discusses potential future directions of communication and how collaborative online solutions could help address global issues.
eLearning – Opportunities And Challenges (Sln)Nigel Gibson
The document discusses opportunities and challenges of eLearning. It maps various issues around online learning provision and supporting learning online. Key points include defining common terms like blended learning; considering a spectrum of online learning approaches from fully online to fully face-to-face; examples of open content initiatives and how they can be used; the importance of connecting learners in various ways online; and how technologies are converging, providing more opportunities for online learning through various devices.
This document discusses how to set and achieve goals through planning objectives and iterating on steps. It emphasizes that goals are easier to achieve if you break them down into smaller, more clear objectives. An example is given of the development of Concorde, noting that while it achieved supersonic flight, its success was built on scientific discoveries and innovations over centuries. The document advises thinking about goals, identifying steps to objectives, considering prerequisites, and learning from mistakes in an iterative process.
This document discusses motivation and goal setting. It defines motivation and explains that goals should be specific, measurable, achievable, realistic and time-bound (SMART). Some key steps to achieving goals are breaking them down into smaller, more manageable objectives. An example is given of the development of Concorde over many years through the work of scientists like Newton and Bernoulli, culminating in its first flight in 1969. The importance of learning from failures and others' experiences is also discussed.
The document discusses Carl Jung's theory of psychological types, which categorizes people into four dimensions based on how they perceive and judge information. It describes the four dimensions as sensing vs intuition for perception and thinking vs feeling for judgment. People's predominant dimensions can indicate their learning style, including mastery, understanding, interpersonal, and self-expressive styles. The document provides examples matching types of intelligence and careers to different learning styles.
1) Cheating involves getting unauthorized help on assignments, quizzes or exams, while plagiarism is presenting another's work or ideas as your own.
2) There are different types of plagiarism, including failure to cite sources, failure to use quotation marks, and patchwriting (using sections of copied text without citations).
3) Plagiarism can be unintentional through poor citation or failure to use quotation marks, or intentional through directly copying or buying papers.
This document discusses motivation and goal setting. It defines motivation and explains that goals should be specific, measurable, achievable, realistic and time-bound (SMART). Some key steps in achieving goals are breaking them down into smaller, more manageable objectives. An example is given of the development of Concorde over many years through the work of scientists like Newton and engineers achieving objectives along the way. The importance of learning from failures and others' work is also discussed.
This document introduces the PROMPT test for evaluating information. The PROMPT test examines the Presentation, Relevance, Objectivity, Method, Provenance, and Timeliness of information. It discusses assessing each element, such as considering the balance of evidence for objectivity and who produced the information and why for provenance. The document recommends using the PROMPT test's criteria to help determine how useful or credible a piece of information may be.
This document discusses the history and evolution of communication. It explores how communication has changed from the Middle Ages to the present day, moving from oral communication to written texts to digital communication online. Examples are provided of communication methods from different historical periods, showing how communication technologies have advanced over time. The document also briefly discusses potential future directions of communication and how collaborative online solutions could help address global issues.
eLearning – Opportunities And Challenges (Sln)Nigel Gibson
The document discusses opportunities and challenges of eLearning. It maps various issues around online learning provision and supporting learning online. Key points include defining common terms like blended learning; considering a spectrum of online learning approaches from fully online to fully face-to-face; examples of open content initiatives and how they can be used; the importance of connecting learners in various ways online; and how technologies are converging, providing more opportunities for online learning through various devices.
This document discusses how to set and achieve goals through planning objectives and iterating on steps. It emphasizes that goals are easier to achieve if you break them down into smaller, more clear objectives. An example is given of the development of Concorde, noting that while it achieved supersonic flight, its success was built on scientific discoveries and innovations over centuries. The document advises thinking about goals, identifying steps to objectives, considering prerequisites, and learning from mistakes in an iterative process.
This document discusses motivation and goal setting. It defines motivation and explains that goals should be specific, measurable, achievable, realistic and time-bound (SMART). Some key steps to achieving goals are breaking them down into smaller, more manageable objectives. An example is given of the development of Concorde over many years through the work of scientists like Newton and Bernoulli, culminating in its first flight in 1969. The importance of learning from failures and others' experiences is also discussed.
This document discusses how to evaluate the credibility of information sources. It outlines several principles for verifying sources, including verification, objectivity, and transparency. When evaluating sources, one should consider the purpose, accuracy, authority, relevance, and currency of the information using the PAARC method. Wikipedia can contain biases and errors, so it's best to cite sources it links to rather than Wikipedia itself. The document also discusses types of websites based on their top-level domains and warns about misinformation and predatory sources. It emphasizes scrutinizing sources, corroborating information, and properly acknowledging sources to avoid plagiarism.
This document provides information about research skills and the research process. It defines key terms like information literacy and scholarly sources. It discusses the types of information found in databases and lists examples of primary sources. It describes the steps of the research process, including defining the task, seeking information from various sources, locating, accessing and using the information, synthesizing from multiple sources, and evaluating the completed work. It discusses strategies for evaluating websites and outlines the Big6 model of solving information problems through task definition, information seeking, location, use, synthesis and evaluation. It also provides some examples of integrating information literacy instruction into classroom lessons.
The document provides an overview of evaluating research information. It discusses the importance of critically evaluating information sources and being aware of biases. It outlines different forms of value - objective, intersubjective, and subjective - that should be considered in evaluation. Key criteria for evaluating sources are described, such as relevance, authority, objectivity, and currency. Cognitive biases that can influence evaluation are also explored. The need for balanced, holistic evaluation that considers multiple perspectives is emphasized.
The document provides an overview of evaluating research information. It discusses the importance of critically evaluating information sources and being aware of biases. It outlines different forms of value - objective, intersubjective, and subjective - that must be considered in evaluation. Key criteria for evaluating sources are described, such as relevance, authority, objectivity, and currency. The need to balance various evaluation criteria with the time available is also noted.
This document provides guidance on evaluating online sources using the CRAAP test, which stands for Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose. It explains each component of the CRAAP test and prompts students to consider questions like the date the information was published, the author's credentials, whether the content is fact-based or opinion, and the overall goals and biases of the source. The document suggests applying this source evaluation method to a sample website as a class activity and encourages students to practice these skills when researching online.
The document summarizes research on the strategies and challenges of skilled and less skilled online readers. It finds that less skilled readers struggle with generating precise searches, evaluating source reliability, and synthesizing information from multiple sources. More skilled readers have strategies for asking focused questions, critically evaluating sources for accuracy and bias, and synthesizing information to answer questions. The document provides examples of strategies used by both skilled and less skilled readers and principles for supporting online inquiry in educational settings.
Many educators heard and use UbD. However, more than often teachers are not trained well in designing high quality UbD units. In may latest review of teacher generated UbD units, I found that most of them lack the ability to understand the stages well. In this workshop, teachers are re-introduced to UbD in terms of unit planning focusing on key determinant issues in UbD unit planning. Teachers are then engaged in redesigning their unit plans in light of the new findings.
The CRAAP test is a list of questions to help evaluate information found. It stands for Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose. The document then defines each element of the CRAAP test and provides questions to consider for each to determine the quality and reliability of a source. It was created by the Meriam Library at Chico State and the questions are meant to help determine if a source is current, significant to your topic, from a qualified author, truthful/correct, and unbiased.
Qualitative research requires understanding a social phenomenon by spending time in the field. It involves community with those being researched and a tolerance for ambiguity. Common qualitative methods include interviews, focus groups, questionnaires, case studies, observations, ethnography, phenomenology, and narrative inquiry/text analysis. Qualitative research involves good listening skills, multiple recording devices, patience, time, and a desire to learn. Proposals for qualitative studies should include plans for ethical considerations, data collection and analysis techniques, and timelines. The goal is to achieve deep understanding of a social setting through qualitative methods.
This document provides guidance on how to evaluate the credibility of websites through performing the C.R.R.a.P. test. The C.R.R.a.P. test stands for Currency, Relevance, Reliability, and Purpose. It involves checking that the information is up-to-date (Currency), relevant to your topic (Relevance), from trustworthy authors with verifiable expertise (Reliability), and published for informational rather than hidden commercial purposes (Purpose). Performing this test on websites can help determine which sources provide trustworthy information for research.
This document provides guidance on how to evaluate the credibility of websites through performing the C.R.R.a.P. test. The C.R.R.a.P. test stands for Currency, Relevance, Reliability, and Purpose. It suggests checking the currency or timeliness of the information, relevance to the research topic, reliability of the author's credentials and potential biases, sources of information, and purpose of the website. Performing this test can help determine if a website can be trusted as a credible source.
Using Qualitative Methods for Library Evaluation: An Interactive WorkshopOCLC
Connaway, Lynn Silipigni, and Marie L. Radford. 2016. "Using Qualitative Methods for Library Evaluation: An Interactive Workshop." Presented at the Libraries in the Digital Age (LIDA) Conference, Zadar, Croatia, June 14.
Using Qualitative Methods for Library Evaluation: An Interactive WorkshopLynn Connaway
Connaway, Lynn Silipigni, and Marie L. Radford. 2016. "Using Qualitative Methods for Library Evaluation: An Interactive Workshop." Presented at the Libraries in the Digital Age (LIDA) Conference, Zadar, Croatia, June 14.
Evaluation of Text and Images in Multicultural Contextanknownz091
The document provides guidance on critically evaluating texts and images in multicultural contexts. It discusses critical thinking, critical reading, and qualities of a critical reader. Key aspects of evaluation include examining the source, context, content, audience, and author of a text or image. Questions are provided to guide evaluation of texts and images, considering factors like organization, cultural background, biases, credibility, and usefulness of the information. Critical listening skills are also important, like seeking clarification and being sensitive to verbal and non-verbal cues.
Stephen Abram discusses transformational leadership strategies for librarians. He talks about the importance of collaboration, speaking with one voice, and prioritizing initiatives for maximum impact. Abram notes that the Philippines is poised for growth and discusses how librarians can help support education, the economy, and quality of life. He emphasizes developing leadership skills through training programs and emphasizes qualities like passion, risk-taking, and flexibility.
This document provides guidance on evaluating the credibility of sources using the CRAAP test, which stands for Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose. It discusses why source evaluation is important and what makes a source trustworthy or untrustworthy. It then defines each component of the CRAAP test and provides questions to consider for evaluating a source on currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, and purpose. The document also discusses how Wikipedia can be used as a background resource but not as a direct citation. It concludes by having the reader apply the CRAAP test to evaluate potential sources for an essay.
Searching and evaluating internet resourcesTayyabaMaher
This document discusses strategies for effectively researching and evaluating internet resources. It outlines steps to take when searching the internet, such as defining a purpose, using keywords, and reviewing search results. It emphasizes that anyone can publish anything online, so users must carefully evaluate sources for quality and accuracy. A CARRDSS framework is presented to help assess a source's credibility, authority, accuracy, relevance, reliability, date, sources, and scope. Domain names, author credentials, evidence of knowledge, and affiliations can indicate a source's credibility. Users should consider sources' dates, potential biases, documentation of information, and comprehensiveness when evaluating reliability and relevance.
In-House Content Strategy - MinneWebCon April 2013m3ggiesue
Your organization's content needs help, and it's your job to fix it. But where do you begin? Change from within can be daunting. It may seem like the problems are too big for one person, or one team, to fix. Luckily, you can start to make a meaningful impact with just a few small changes.
This session will offer tips and tools for creating a content strategy from within your organization. You'll get a handful of easy-to-implement, start-today tactics, as well as insight into effecting meaningful longterm change.
Essential skill sets needed for successful Corporate Relations Officer at a Research University, presented to NACRO Aug 2015 with Kathy Lynch, Boston University
Reimagining Your Library Space: How to Increase the Vibes in Your Library No ...Diana Rendina
Librarians are leading the way in creating future-ready citizens – now we need to update our spaces to match. In this session, attendees will get inspiration for transforming their library spaces. You’ll learn how to survey students and patrons, create a focus group, and use design thinking to brainstorm ideas for your space. We’ll discuss budget friendly ways to change your space as well as how to find funding. No matter where you’re at, you’ll find ideas for reimagining your space in this session.
A workshop hosted by the South African Journal of Science aimed at postgraduate students and early career researchers with little or no experience in writing and publishing journal articles.
This document discusses how to evaluate the credibility of information sources. It outlines several principles for verifying sources, including verification, objectivity, and transparency. When evaluating sources, one should consider the purpose, accuracy, authority, relevance, and currency of the information using the PAARC method. Wikipedia can contain biases and errors, so it's best to cite sources it links to rather than Wikipedia itself. The document also discusses types of websites based on their top-level domains and warns about misinformation and predatory sources. It emphasizes scrutinizing sources, corroborating information, and properly acknowledging sources to avoid plagiarism.
This document provides information about research skills and the research process. It defines key terms like information literacy and scholarly sources. It discusses the types of information found in databases and lists examples of primary sources. It describes the steps of the research process, including defining the task, seeking information from various sources, locating, accessing and using the information, synthesizing from multiple sources, and evaluating the completed work. It discusses strategies for evaluating websites and outlines the Big6 model of solving information problems through task definition, information seeking, location, use, synthesis and evaluation. It also provides some examples of integrating information literacy instruction into classroom lessons.
The document provides an overview of evaluating research information. It discusses the importance of critically evaluating information sources and being aware of biases. It outlines different forms of value - objective, intersubjective, and subjective - that should be considered in evaluation. Key criteria for evaluating sources are described, such as relevance, authority, objectivity, and currency. Cognitive biases that can influence evaluation are also explored. The need for balanced, holistic evaluation that considers multiple perspectives is emphasized.
The document provides an overview of evaluating research information. It discusses the importance of critically evaluating information sources and being aware of biases. It outlines different forms of value - objective, intersubjective, and subjective - that must be considered in evaluation. Key criteria for evaluating sources are described, such as relevance, authority, objectivity, and currency. The need to balance various evaluation criteria with the time available is also noted.
This document provides guidance on evaluating online sources using the CRAAP test, which stands for Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose. It explains each component of the CRAAP test and prompts students to consider questions like the date the information was published, the author's credentials, whether the content is fact-based or opinion, and the overall goals and biases of the source. The document suggests applying this source evaluation method to a sample website as a class activity and encourages students to practice these skills when researching online.
The document summarizes research on the strategies and challenges of skilled and less skilled online readers. It finds that less skilled readers struggle with generating precise searches, evaluating source reliability, and synthesizing information from multiple sources. More skilled readers have strategies for asking focused questions, critically evaluating sources for accuracy and bias, and synthesizing information to answer questions. The document provides examples of strategies used by both skilled and less skilled readers and principles for supporting online inquiry in educational settings.
Many educators heard and use UbD. However, more than often teachers are not trained well in designing high quality UbD units. In may latest review of teacher generated UbD units, I found that most of them lack the ability to understand the stages well. In this workshop, teachers are re-introduced to UbD in terms of unit planning focusing on key determinant issues in UbD unit planning. Teachers are then engaged in redesigning their unit plans in light of the new findings.
The CRAAP test is a list of questions to help evaluate information found. It stands for Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose. The document then defines each element of the CRAAP test and provides questions to consider for each to determine the quality and reliability of a source. It was created by the Meriam Library at Chico State and the questions are meant to help determine if a source is current, significant to your topic, from a qualified author, truthful/correct, and unbiased.
Qualitative research requires understanding a social phenomenon by spending time in the field. It involves community with those being researched and a tolerance for ambiguity. Common qualitative methods include interviews, focus groups, questionnaires, case studies, observations, ethnography, phenomenology, and narrative inquiry/text analysis. Qualitative research involves good listening skills, multiple recording devices, patience, time, and a desire to learn. Proposals for qualitative studies should include plans for ethical considerations, data collection and analysis techniques, and timelines. The goal is to achieve deep understanding of a social setting through qualitative methods.
This document provides guidance on how to evaluate the credibility of websites through performing the C.R.R.a.P. test. The C.R.R.a.P. test stands for Currency, Relevance, Reliability, and Purpose. It involves checking that the information is up-to-date (Currency), relevant to your topic (Relevance), from trustworthy authors with verifiable expertise (Reliability), and published for informational rather than hidden commercial purposes (Purpose). Performing this test on websites can help determine which sources provide trustworthy information for research.
This document provides guidance on how to evaluate the credibility of websites through performing the C.R.R.a.P. test. The C.R.R.a.P. test stands for Currency, Relevance, Reliability, and Purpose. It suggests checking the currency or timeliness of the information, relevance to the research topic, reliability of the author's credentials and potential biases, sources of information, and purpose of the website. Performing this test can help determine if a website can be trusted as a credible source.
Using Qualitative Methods for Library Evaluation: An Interactive WorkshopOCLC
Connaway, Lynn Silipigni, and Marie L. Radford. 2016. "Using Qualitative Methods for Library Evaluation: An Interactive Workshop." Presented at the Libraries in the Digital Age (LIDA) Conference, Zadar, Croatia, June 14.
Using Qualitative Methods for Library Evaluation: An Interactive WorkshopLynn Connaway
Connaway, Lynn Silipigni, and Marie L. Radford. 2016. "Using Qualitative Methods for Library Evaluation: An Interactive Workshop." Presented at the Libraries in the Digital Age (LIDA) Conference, Zadar, Croatia, June 14.
Evaluation of Text and Images in Multicultural Contextanknownz091
The document provides guidance on critically evaluating texts and images in multicultural contexts. It discusses critical thinking, critical reading, and qualities of a critical reader. Key aspects of evaluation include examining the source, context, content, audience, and author of a text or image. Questions are provided to guide evaluation of texts and images, considering factors like organization, cultural background, biases, credibility, and usefulness of the information. Critical listening skills are also important, like seeking clarification and being sensitive to verbal and non-verbal cues.
Stephen Abram discusses transformational leadership strategies for librarians. He talks about the importance of collaboration, speaking with one voice, and prioritizing initiatives for maximum impact. Abram notes that the Philippines is poised for growth and discusses how librarians can help support education, the economy, and quality of life. He emphasizes developing leadership skills through training programs and emphasizes qualities like passion, risk-taking, and flexibility.
This document provides guidance on evaluating the credibility of sources using the CRAAP test, which stands for Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose. It discusses why source evaluation is important and what makes a source trustworthy or untrustworthy. It then defines each component of the CRAAP test and provides questions to consider for evaluating a source on currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, and purpose. The document also discusses how Wikipedia can be used as a background resource but not as a direct citation. It concludes by having the reader apply the CRAAP test to evaluate potential sources for an essay.
Searching and evaluating internet resourcesTayyabaMaher
This document discusses strategies for effectively researching and evaluating internet resources. It outlines steps to take when searching the internet, such as defining a purpose, using keywords, and reviewing search results. It emphasizes that anyone can publish anything online, so users must carefully evaluate sources for quality and accuracy. A CARRDSS framework is presented to help assess a source's credibility, authority, accuracy, relevance, reliability, date, sources, and scope. Domain names, author credentials, evidence of knowledge, and affiliations can indicate a source's credibility. Users should consider sources' dates, potential biases, documentation of information, and comprehensiveness when evaluating reliability and relevance.
In-House Content Strategy - MinneWebCon April 2013m3ggiesue
Your organization's content needs help, and it's your job to fix it. But where do you begin? Change from within can be daunting. It may seem like the problems are too big for one person, or one team, to fix. Luckily, you can start to make a meaningful impact with just a few small changes.
This session will offer tips and tools for creating a content strategy from within your organization. You'll get a handful of easy-to-implement, start-today tactics, as well as insight into effecting meaningful longterm change.
Essential skill sets needed for successful Corporate Relations Officer at a Research University, presented to NACRO Aug 2015 with Kathy Lynch, Boston University
Reimagining Your Library Space: How to Increase the Vibes in Your Library No ...Diana Rendina
Librarians are leading the way in creating future-ready citizens – now we need to update our spaces to match. In this session, attendees will get inspiration for transforming their library spaces. You’ll learn how to survey students and patrons, create a focus group, and use design thinking to brainstorm ideas for your space. We’ll discuss budget friendly ways to change your space as well as how to find funding. No matter where you’re at, you’ll find ideas for reimagining your space in this session.
A workshop hosted by the South African Journal of Science aimed at postgraduate students and early career researchers with little or no experience in writing and publishing journal articles.
it describes the bony anatomy including the femoral head , acetabulum, labrum . also discusses the capsule , ligaments . muscle that act on the hip joint and the range of motion are outlined. factors affecting hip joint stability and weight transmission through the joint are summarized.
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...PECB
Denis is a dynamic and results-driven Chief Information Officer (CIO) with a distinguished career spanning information systems analysis and technical project management. With a proven track record of spearheading the design and delivery of cutting-edge Information Management solutions, he has consistently elevated business operations, streamlined reporting functions, and maximized process efficiency.
Certified as an ISO/IEC 27001: Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) Lead Implementer, Data Protection Officer, and Cyber Risks Analyst, Denis brings a heightened focus on data security, privacy, and cyber resilience to every endeavor.
His expertise extends across a diverse spectrum of reporting, database, and web development applications, underpinned by an exceptional grasp of data storage and virtualization technologies. His proficiency in application testing, database administration, and data cleansing ensures seamless execution of complex projects.
What sets Denis apart is his comprehensive understanding of Business and Systems Analysis technologies, honed through involvement in all phases of the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC). From meticulous requirements gathering to precise analysis, innovative design, rigorous development, thorough testing, and successful implementation, he has consistently delivered exceptional results.
Throughout his career, he has taken on multifaceted roles, from leading technical project management teams to owning solutions that drive operational excellence. His conscientious and proactive approach is unwavering, whether he is working independently or collaboratively within a team. His ability to connect with colleagues on a personal level underscores his commitment to fostering a harmonious and productive workplace environment.
Date: May 29, 2024
Tags: Information Security, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, Artificial Intelligence, GDPR
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find out more about ISO training and certification services
Training: ISO/IEC 27001 Information Security Management System - EN | PECB
ISO/IEC 42001 Artificial Intelligence Management System - EN | PECB
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) - Training Courses - EN | PECB
Webinars: https://pecb.com/webinars
Article: https://pecb.com/article
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information about PECB:
Website: https://pecb.com/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/pecb/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PECBInternational/
Slideshare: http://www.slideshare.net/PECBCERTIFICATION
How to Add Chatter in the odoo 17 ERP ModuleCeline George
In Odoo, the chatter is like a chat tool that helps you work together on records. You can leave notes and track things, making it easier to talk with your team and partners. Inside chatter, all communication history, activity, and changes will be displayed.
How to Make a Field Mandatory in Odoo 17Celine George
In Odoo, making a field required can be done through both Python code and XML views. When you set the required attribute to True in Python code, it makes the field required across all views where it's used. Conversely, when you set the required attribute in XML views, it makes the field required only in the context of that particular view.
हिंदी वर्णमाला पीपीटी, hindi alphabet PPT presentation, hindi varnamala PPT, Hindi Varnamala pdf, हिंदी स्वर, हिंदी व्यंजन, sikhiye hindi varnmala, dr. mulla adam ali, hindi language and literature, hindi alphabet with drawing, hindi alphabet pdf, hindi varnamala for childrens, hindi language, hindi varnamala practice for kids, https://www.drmullaadamali.com
বাংলাদেশের অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা ২০২৪ [Bangladesh Economic Review 2024 Bangla.pdf] কম্পিউটার , ট্যাব ও স্মার্ট ফোন ভার্সন সহ সম্পূর্ণ বাংলা ই-বুক বা pdf বই " সুচিপত্র ...বুকমার্ক মেনু 🔖 ও হাইপার লিংক মেনু 📝👆 যুক্ত ..
আমাদের সবার জন্য খুব খুব গুরুত্বপূর্ণ একটি বই ..বিসিএস, ব্যাংক, ইউনিভার্সিটি ভর্তি ও যে কোন প্রতিযোগিতা মূলক পরীক্ষার জন্য এর খুব ইম্পরট্যান্ট একটি বিষয় ...তাছাড়া বাংলাদেশের সাম্প্রতিক যে কোন ডাটা বা তথ্য এই বইতে পাবেন ...
তাই একজন নাগরিক হিসাবে এই তথ্য গুলো আপনার জানা প্রয়োজন ...।
বিসিএস ও ব্যাংক এর লিখিত পরীক্ষা ...+এছাড়া মাধ্যমিক ও উচ্চমাধ্যমিকের স্টুডেন্টদের জন্য অনেক কাজে আসবে ...
Strategies for Effective Upskilling is a presentation by Chinwendu Peace in a Your Skill Boost Masterclass organisation by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan on 08th and 09th June 2024 from 1 PM to 3 PM on each day.
This presentation was provided by Steph Pollock of The American Psychological Association’s Journals Program, and Damita Snow, of The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), for the initial session of NISO's 2024 Training Series "DEIA in the Scholarly Landscape." Session One: 'Setting Expectations: a DEIA Primer,' was held June 6, 2024.
1. Assessing Web Sites
L&D professionals
operating in the digital world
J Holmes based on materials from the Open University UK
2. Background
• Critical evaluation of information is an
essential skill.
• This is particularly so in the digital realm,
where existence can masquerade as authority.
3. A simple framework…
• A structured approach to evaluate information
• Assess the quality and relevance of websites
5. Presentation
• Is the information clearly communicated?
• Look at language, layout, structure, etc.
6. Relevance
• does the information match the needs of the
searcher?
• Look at the introduction or overview – what is
it mainly about?
7. Objectivity
• Is the author’s position of interest made clear?
• Look for an introduction or overview – do the
writers state their position on the issue?
Is the language emotive?
Are there hidden, vested interests?
8. Method
• Is it clear how research data was collected?
• Were the methods appropriate? Do you trust
it?
9. Provenance
• Is it clear where the information has come
from?
• Can you identify the authors or organisations?
How was it published?
10. Timeliness
• Is it clear when the information was
produced?
• Does the date of the information meet your
requirements? Is it obsolete?