Elaborated by Jens Gabbe, Chairman of the AEBR Advisory Committee, in the context of the 3rd Meeting of the Greater Tumen Initiative’s Northeast Asia Local Cooperation Committee
7th of August 2015, Choibalsan City, Mongolia
This document summarizes a literature review on technical assistance (TA) to countries in the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS). It finds that while TA has been widely used in the CIS since the 1990s, there is little research evaluating its effectiveness in these countries. Most studies focus on other regions or individual projects. The literature identifies common problems with TA such as lack of sustainability, weak capacity building, and failure to strengthen local institutions. Donors have made efforts to improve TA through initiatives promoting country ownership and harmonization, but challenges remain. More research is needed on TA's long-term impact and political economy in the context of the CIS.
The idea of a Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Agreement goes beyond the traditional concept of trade liberalization and, apart from the elimination of tariffs in trade of goods, it also includes the reduction/ removal of non-tariff barriers, the liberalization of the investment regime, the liberalization of trade in services, and the far-reaching harmonization/ mutual recognition of various trade and investment-related regulations and institutions. The economic literature, CGE modeling exercises and the practical experience of “deep” trade integration suggest a substantial potential for the future EU-Ukraine DCFTA in promoting trade and investments, creating additional welfare and employment, regulatory and institutional harmonization with EU’s acquis, and modernizing Ukraine’s economy. While beneficial for both sides, the potential gains (but also potential adjustment costs) are greater for Ukraine as it is the smaller partner with higher initial trade barriers. However, the DCFTA does not include an automatic guarantee of success. Very much depends on the political will and administrative capacity to implement all of its provisions in a timely and accurate manner. This is a serious challenge for Ukraine, which has a mixed record in reforming its economy and state and which is still struggling to fulfill all of its commitments undertaken during the WTO accession process.
Authored by: Marek Dabrowski and Svitlana Taran
Published in 2012
George Bogachevsky is seeking a professional position utilizing his research, analytical, and creative skills. He has extensive education and experience in accounting, finance, and economic analysis. He is currently an accountant at the U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis, where he performs financial analysis and research on international economic relations.
1) The keynote speech discusses cross-border cooperation between Finland and Russia, noting that such cooperation has transformed borders from obstacles to opportunities for development in border regions.
2) It provides examples of cooperation programs between Finnish and Russian border regions, such as those promoting tourism and creative industries. These programs have led to economic growth and jobs in border areas.
3) The speech emphasizes that fully committed participation from regions on both sides of the border is key to making cross-border cooperation a success, and it looks optimistically to continued cooperation between Finland and Russia going forward.
Current and future role of Central-Eastern European countries and firms withi...Aliaksey Narko
Central and Eastern European countries are playing an increasingly important role in global logistics systems due to their strategic geographic locations and lower costs compared to Western Europe. Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic have experienced significant growth in their logistics sectors since joining the EU. They have attracted many manufacturing and logistics companies through advantages like skilled labor forces and infrastructure investments. However, challenges remain such as modernizing rail and port facilities to handle growing trade volumes. CEE countries are expected to continue expanding their roles as logistics hubs between Western Europe and other regions in the future.
The document provides an overview of international business, including definitions, objectives, importance, modes, and terms. It discusses how international business allows for the optimization of resources and diversification of risk. Key terms are defined, such as multinational companies, global companies, and transnational companies. International business is described as important for earning foreign exchange, utilizing resources efficiently, achieving corporate objectives, spreading risk, improving efficiency, and gaining government benefits. Common modes of international business include imports/exports, tourism/transportation, licensing/franchising, turnkey operations, management contracts, and direct/portfolio investment.
This paper reviews the published literature on the definition and measurement of the administrative and compliance costs of taxation, with special reference to VAT (including evasion and fraud) in the European Union.
Written by Luca Barbone, Richard M. Bird, and Jaime Vasquez-Caro. Published in March, 2012.
See more on our website: http://www.case-research.eu/en/node/57573
This document summarizes a literature review on technical assistance (TA) to countries in the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS). It finds that while TA has been widely used in the CIS since the 1990s, there is little research evaluating its effectiveness in these countries. Most studies focus on other regions or individual projects. The literature identifies common problems with TA such as lack of sustainability, weak capacity building, and failure to strengthen local institutions. Donors have made efforts to improve TA through initiatives promoting country ownership and harmonization, but challenges remain. More research is needed on TA's long-term impact and political economy in the context of the CIS.
The idea of a Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Agreement goes beyond the traditional concept of trade liberalization and, apart from the elimination of tariffs in trade of goods, it also includes the reduction/ removal of non-tariff barriers, the liberalization of the investment regime, the liberalization of trade in services, and the far-reaching harmonization/ mutual recognition of various trade and investment-related regulations and institutions. The economic literature, CGE modeling exercises and the practical experience of “deep” trade integration suggest a substantial potential for the future EU-Ukraine DCFTA in promoting trade and investments, creating additional welfare and employment, regulatory and institutional harmonization with EU’s acquis, and modernizing Ukraine’s economy. While beneficial for both sides, the potential gains (but also potential adjustment costs) are greater for Ukraine as it is the smaller partner with higher initial trade barriers. However, the DCFTA does not include an automatic guarantee of success. Very much depends on the political will and administrative capacity to implement all of its provisions in a timely and accurate manner. This is a serious challenge for Ukraine, which has a mixed record in reforming its economy and state and which is still struggling to fulfill all of its commitments undertaken during the WTO accession process.
Authored by: Marek Dabrowski and Svitlana Taran
Published in 2012
George Bogachevsky is seeking a professional position utilizing his research, analytical, and creative skills. He has extensive education and experience in accounting, finance, and economic analysis. He is currently an accountant at the U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis, where he performs financial analysis and research on international economic relations.
1) The keynote speech discusses cross-border cooperation between Finland and Russia, noting that such cooperation has transformed borders from obstacles to opportunities for development in border regions.
2) It provides examples of cooperation programs between Finnish and Russian border regions, such as those promoting tourism and creative industries. These programs have led to economic growth and jobs in border areas.
3) The speech emphasizes that fully committed participation from regions on both sides of the border is key to making cross-border cooperation a success, and it looks optimistically to continued cooperation between Finland and Russia going forward.
Current and future role of Central-Eastern European countries and firms withi...Aliaksey Narko
Central and Eastern European countries are playing an increasingly important role in global logistics systems due to their strategic geographic locations and lower costs compared to Western Europe. Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic have experienced significant growth in their logistics sectors since joining the EU. They have attracted many manufacturing and logistics companies through advantages like skilled labor forces and infrastructure investments. However, challenges remain such as modernizing rail and port facilities to handle growing trade volumes. CEE countries are expected to continue expanding their roles as logistics hubs between Western Europe and other regions in the future.
The document provides an overview of international business, including definitions, objectives, importance, modes, and terms. It discusses how international business allows for the optimization of resources and diversification of risk. Key terms are defined, such as multinational companies, global companies, and transnational companies. International business is described as important for earning foreign exchange, utilizing resources efficiently, achieving corporate objectives, spreading risk, improving efficiency, and gaining government benefits. Common modes of international business include imports/exports, tourism/transportation, licensing/franchising, turnkey operations, management contracts, and direct/portfolio investment.
This paper reviews the published literature on the definition and measurement of the administrative and compliance costs of taxation, with special reference to VAT (including evasion and fraud) in the European Union.
Written by Luca Barbone, Richard M. Bird, and Jaime Vasquez-Caro. Published in March, 2012.
See more on our website: http://www.case-research.eu/en/node/57573
Doing business and investing in the Russian Federation, 2015PwC Russia
This guide has been prepared for general guidance on matters of interest only, and does not constitute professional advice. You should not act upon the information contained in this guide without obtaining specific professional advice. No representation or warranty (express or implied) is given as to the accuracy, timeliness or completeness of the information contained in this guide, and, to the extent permitted by law, PwC, its members, employees and agents accept no liability, and disclaim all responsibility, for the consequences of you or anyone else acting, or refraining to act, in reliance on the information
contained in this guide or for any decision based on it.
saia_EPF Drivers of Regional Integration_EDIP_20160203 webIvan Oliveira
This document discusses how global value chains have disrupted traditional concepts of regional integration. The fragmentation of production processes across borders has complicated analyses of trade, comparative advantage, and regional production spaces. However, some of the most successful value chain development, such as in China, still had strong regional dimensions, with production tasks transferring between nearby economies like China, Japan, South Korea, and Southeast Asia. Looking ahead, modern regional integration must address wider issues that demand more uniform regulations across larger spaces, while also allowing for local variation. Global value chains did not eliminate the regional concept, but have made it more complex and multi-dimensional.
Presentation for ppd sme belarus 2 of march 2018 presentation minsk 3 draft 1...Günther Fehlinger
This document discusses strategies for Belarus to reach the next level of economic development, focusing on supporting small and medium enterprises (SMEs). It recommends learning from the experiences of other Eastern Partnership, Central and Eastern European, and Southeast European countries. Key points include establishing a national SME policy agency and regional development agencies, improving access to finance for SMEs, creating a consensus around SME competitiveness through public-private dialogue, and engaging in regional cooperation initiatives like the Regional Cooperation Council and CEFTA. Adopting elements of the European Union's regulatory framework is seen as important for achieving higher GDP per capita levels.
An annual interactive conference that brings professionals in public & corporate affairs, business leaders, policymakers, NGOs and communication experts in a multi-stakeholder platform
BALTNET is a non-profit organization established seven years ago in Connecticut that provides resources to connect institutions in New England and the Baltic states (Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia) in areas of business, education, and culture. Its mission is to facilitate partnerships between these regions by bridging countries, connecting resources, and promoting collaboration. It aims to increase visibility of the opportunities available in both the Baltic states and New England for business, research, and education.
The paper examines the economic implications of Belarus' participation in the newly created EURASEC Customs Union. The results of the calculations show that after the introduction of a common external tariff (CET) the level of tariff protection in Belarus has not increased noticeably. The reduction in the volume of imports from non-CIS countries equal to USD 1.1 bn (8% of Belarusian non-CIS import in 2008) will be mainly brought about by cancellation of used cars imports from non-member countries. The analyses revealed that Belarusian budget can benefit from participation in the Customs Union (CU). The amount of possible gain will be about 28.3% of total budget revenues from customs duties and customs charges in 2008 due to the fact that approximately 40% of Russian imports may go through customs clearance in Belarus owning to less bureaucracy at the border with respect to Russia, and the revenues from customs charges, which is not planned to be distributed among member countries, will be transferred to Belarusian budget. However, it is unlikely that CU membership will increase foreign direct investment (FDI) inflow to Belarus, since in the case of South-South regional trade agreements (the type of EURASEC countries CU) FDI usually goes to the bigger country, i.e. to the bigger market. Therefore, most probably that in the regional arrangement in question Russia followed by Kazakhstan will be the main beneficiaries of foreign direct investments.
Authored by: Irina Tochitskaya
Published in 2010
Synthesis and Foreign Policy Debates, Nr. 7, July 2016Lina Grau
The Newsletter Synthesis and Foreign Policy Debates is produced by the Foreign Policy Association of Moldova in partnership with Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (FES). The programme is part of the FES/APE “Foreign Policy Dialogues” Project. The content can be reproduced by mentioning the source. The materials are realized by Lina Grau, foreign policy expert and programme coordinator with APE.
Topics of the edition:
1. The British Ambassador to Chisinau, Phil Batson: Taking business out of politics is one of the major challenges for the future of the Republic of Moldova
2. Executive Director of IDIS Viitorul, Igor Munteanu: A federalization model would disintegrate the Republic of Moldova rather than strengthen in.
3. “Elections in Transnistria –are they going to change the situation?” – an editorial by Ernest Vardanean.
The document discusses Moldova's membership in international organizations and the fees associated with that membership. It notes that while Moldova has joined over 60 international bodies, the enthusiasm for joining has not always considered the costs and benefits to Moldova. Membership fees to these organizations total around 50 million lei annually. The document evaluates Moldova's participation in terms of efficiency, highlighting organizations like the UN, Council of Europe, WTO, and OSCE as providing clear benefits that outweigh their membership costs, such as advancing human rights, resolving trade disputes, and supporting development. However, it also notes there are some memberships where the usefulness is less clear when considering Moldova's limited resources.
This document analyzes the potential for a free trade agreement between the European Union and China. It begins by reviewing existing EU trade agreements and policies. It then examines current trade relations between the EU and China, noting their significant growth in recent years. However, it also identifies trade barriers that foreign investors face in China. The document outlines cooperation agendas between the EU and China, focusing on increasing investment and standards. It studies the impacts of past episodes and Chinese investment in Europe. In conclusion, it recommends that a free trade agreement would further encourage bilateral investment and economic cooperation between the large economic partners.
Effects of the Brussels Agreement on the Business Environment in Kosovo–Incen...Niall Ardill
The document analyzes the effects of the 2013 Brussels Agreement on the business environment in Kosovo. It discusses both the direct and indirect impacts of the agreement. Indirectly, the agreement's inclusion of policing and judiciary reforms could positively impact economic growth if rule of law is strengthened. Infrastructure issues like energy and telecommunications sectors are also important to address. Directly, implementing customs revenue collection and creating a development fund may boost local economic development. However, slow implementation of the agreement's provisions has limited its economic impacts so far. The paper aims to provide recommendations to better realize the agreement's potential to incentivize business cooperation and economic growth across Kosovo.
This document is a newsletter from the GIZ Regional Economic Cooperation and Integration in Asia Programme. It provides updates on recent activities including study tours on cross-border cooperation, workshops on trade facilitation and social implications of economic integration, and an expert forum on cross-border cooperation and trade facilitation. It also summarizes recent trends in Asian regionalism from sources like the Asian Development Bank, Boao Forum for Asia, and Institute of Southeast Asian Studies. Upcoming events and new publications from the programme are listed.
China has become the world's second largest economy and largest trading nation due to its growth rate of 7.7% in 2013 and opening of its economy through WTO membership in 2001. The EU and China now trade over €1 billion daily and their trade has increased dramatically in recent decades, with the EU as China's largest supplier but also running a large trade deficit due to imports in sectors like machinery. While barriers remain for EU companies in China, the rapidly growing Chinese market also presents major opportunities for increased EU exports to serve China's rising middle class.
The document discusses Moldova's ongoing negotiations with the EU for a Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Agreement (DCFTA). It provides context on the EU's Eastern Partnership initiative and explains that a DCFTA goes beyond simply reducing tariffs to integrate countries across all trade-related areas like services, intellectual property, and regulations. For Moldova, the key benefits of a DCFTA would be increased foreign investment, technological upgrading, and more competitive exports internationally. The document notes that Moldova has made significant progress in its reforms and appears to be moving faster than Ukraine in DCFTA negotiations.
Presentation for european georgian sme year 2018 presentation tblisi 3 draft...Günther Fehlinger
This document discusses strategies for Georgia to advance economically through small and medium enterprise (SME) policy reforms based on the European model. It recommends that Georgia (1) maximize adoption of EU regulations to accelerate integration, (2) join regional cooperation organizations like CEFTA to prepare for EU membership, and (3) develop consensus around an SME policy framework focused on competition to generate jobs and growth. The overall aim is for Georgia to integrate further with Europe and become the most competitive country in the EU.
Ethnic entrepreneurship - case study- Turin, ItalyThink Ethnic
This document provides a profile of Turin, Italy, including its population characteristics and urban economy. Some key points:
- Turin has experienced four waves of immigration since the 1970s, with the largest groups now coming from Romania, Morocco, Peru, Albania, China, and Egypt.
- Immigrants make up 13.4% of Turin's population and have increased by 76.5% in the last five years.
- Immigrants work in a variety of sectors but are highly concentrated in domestic labor, construction, and services.
- Ethnic associations provide support but have struggled to engage with policymaking.
- Turin is shifting from an automotive economy to knowledge/ICT and
Dragon News is a member magazine, published by the Editorial Committees of the Swedish Chamber of Commerce in Hong Kong and the Swedish Chamber of Commerce in China. The magazine is printed in 3,000 copies four times a year.
The document discusses the Central European Free Trade Agreement (CEFTA). CEFTA is a trade agreement between non-EU countries in Southeast Europe that aims to reduce tariffs and trade barriers. The original CEFTA agreement was signed in 1992 by Poland, Hungary, Czech Republic and Slovakia. All original members have since joined the EU. In 2006, CEFTA was expanded to include Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Moldova, Serbia, Montenegro, and Kosovo to establish a free trade zone in the region by 2010. CEFTA's objectives include the progressive liberalization of services, ensuring stable investment, opening government procurement markets, and protecting intellectual property.
The document discusses the European Union's trade policy and its role in the EU's 2020 strategy for growth. It argues that international trade is important for growth in Europe and around the world. The EU aims to complete ongoing trade deals and engage more closely with strategic partners like the US, China, and Japan to increase GDP by over 1% and create jobs. The policy seeks to reduce barriers to trade in goods, services, investment and public procurement while also ensuring fair competition and a level playing field.
The GR Forum is an annual conference that brings together professionals in public affairs, business leaders, policymakers, NGOs, and communications experts. It aims to promote ethical lobbying and networking between the private sector and government. Prior attendees include members of European and Ukrainian parliaments, heads of business associations, and corporate affairs directors. The forum discusses topics like developing relationships with government, international market opportunities, and legal frameworks. It provides a platform for stakeholders to share knowledge and ideas to influence public policy decisions in Central and Eastern Europe.
The GIZ supports regional economic integration in Asia through its Support for Economic Cooperation in Sub-Regional Initiatives in Asia (SCSI) program. The program works with sub-regional initiatives like the Greater Tumen Initiative and Pan Beibu Gulf Economic Cooperation to strengthen processes of regional integration between countries. The goal is to contribute to sustainable development in the region by promoting cross-border trade and investment, capacity building, and knowledge sharing. In the past, the program has provided training to public and private stakeholders to improve implementation of economic agreements and regional initiatives.
Quarterly newsletter with information on economic cooperation and integration in Asia from the GIZ programme Regional Economic Cooperation and Integration in Asia (RCI). In our newsletter we share information about our programme activities, and further input on the programme’s focus areas such as regionalism, trade facilitation and port cooperation in Asia.
Doing business and investing in the Russian Federation, 2015PwC Russia
This guide has been prepared for general guidance on matters of interest only, and does not constitute professional advice. You should not act upon the information contained in this guide without obtaining specific professional advice. No representation or warranty (express or implied) is given as to the accuracy, timeliness or completeness of the information contained in this guide, and, to the extent permitted by law, PwC, its members, employees and agents accept no liability, and disclaim all responsibility, for the consequences of you or anyone else acting, or refraining to act, in reliance on the information
contained in this guide or for any decision based on it.
saia_EPF Drivers of Regional Integration_EDIP_20160203 webIvan Oliveira
This document discusses how global value chains have disrupted traditional concepts of regional integration. The fragmentation of production processes across borders has complicated analyses of trade, comparative advantage, and regional production spaces. However, some of the most successful value chain development, such as in China, still had strong regional dimensions, with production tasks transferring between nearby economies like China, Japan, South Korea, and Southeast Asia. Looking ahead, modern regional integration must address wider issues that demand more uniform regulations across larger spaces, while also allowing for local variation. Global value chains did not eliminate the regional concept, but have made it more complex and multi-dimensional.
Presentation for ppd sme belarus 2 of march 2018 presentation minsk 3 draft 1...Günther Fehlinger
This document discusses strategies for Belarus to reach the next level of economic development, focusing on supporting small and medium enterprises (SMEs). It recommends learning from the experiences of other Eastern Partnership, Central and Eastern European, and Southeast European countries. Key points include establishing a national SME policy agency and regional development agencies, improving access to finance for SMEs, creating a consensus around SME competitiveness through public-private dialogue, and engaging in regional cooperation initiatives like the Regional Cooperation Council and CEFTA. Adopting elements of the European Union's regulatory framework is seen as important for achieving higher GDP per capita levels.
An annual interactive conference that brings professionals in public & corporate affairs, business leaders, policymakers, NGOs and communication experts in a multi-stakeholder platform
BALTNET is a non-profit organization established seven years ago in Connecticut that provides resources to connect institutions in New England and the Baltic states (Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia) in areas of business, education, and culture. Its mission is to facilitate partnerships between these regions by bridging countries, connecting resources, and promoting collaboration. It aims to increase visibility of the opportunities available in both the Baltic states and New England for business, research, and education.
The paper examines the economic implications of Belarus' participation in the newly created EURASEC Customs Union. The results of the calculations show that after the introduction of a common external tariff (CET) the level of tariff protection in Belarus has not increased noticeably. The reduction in the volume of imports from non-CIS countries equal to USD 1.1 bn (8% of Belarusian non-CIS import in 2008) will be mainly brought about by cancellation of used cars imports from non-member countries. The analyses revealed that Belarusian budget can benefit from participation in the Customs Union (CU). The amount of possible gain will be about 28.3% of total budget revenues from customs duties and customs charges in 2008 due to the fact that approximately 40% of Russian imports may go through customs clearance in Belarus owning to less bureaucracy at the border with respect to Russia, and the revenues from customs charges, which is not planned to be distributed among member countries, will be transferred to Belarusian budget. However, it is unlikely that CU membership will increase foreign direct investment (FDI) inflow to Belarus, since in the case of South-South regional trade agreements (the type of EURASEC countries CU) FDI usually goes to the bigger country, i.e. to the bigger market. Therefore, most probably that in the regional arrangement in question Russia followed by Kazakhstan will be the main beneficiaries of foreign direct investments.
Authored by: Irina Tochitskaya
Published in 2010
Synthesis and Foreign Policy Debates, Nr. 7, July 2016Lina Grau
The Newsletter Synthesis and Foreign Policy Debates is produced by the Foreign Policy Association of Moldova in partnership with Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (FES). The programme is part of the FES/APE “Foreign Policy Dialogues” Project. The content can be reproduced by mentioning the source. The materials are realized by Lina Grau, foreign policy expert and programme coordinator with APE.
Topics of the edition:
1. The British Ambassador to Chisinau, Phil Batson: Taking business out of politics is one of the major challenges for the future of the Republic of Moldova
2. Executive Director of IDIS Viitorul, Igor Munteanu: A federalization model would disintegrate the Republic of Moldova rather than strengthen in.
3. “Elections in Transnistria –are they going to change the situation?” – an editorial by Ernest Vardanean.
The document discusses Moldova's membership in international organizations and the fees associated with that membership. It notes that while Moldova has joined over 60 international bodies, the enthusiasm for joining has not always considered the costs and benefits to Moldova. Membership fees to these organizations total around 50 million lei annually. The document evaluates Moldova's participation in terms of efficiency, highlighting organizations like the UN, Council of Europe, WTO, and OSCE as providing clear benefits that outweigh their membership costs, such as advancing human rights, resolving trade disputes, and supporting development. However, it also notes there are some memberships where the usefulness is less clear when considering Moldova's limited resources.
This document analyzes the potential for a free trade agreement between the European Union and China. It begins by reviewing existing EU trade agreements and policies. It then examines current trade relations between the EU and China, noting their significant growth in recent years. However, it also identifies trade barriers that foreign investors face in China. The document outlines cooperation agendas between the EU and China, focusing on increasing investment and standards. It studies the impacts of past episodes and Chinese investment in Europe. In conclusion, it recommends that a free trade agreement would further encourage bilateral investment and economic cooperation between the large economic partners.
Effects of the Brussels Agreement on the Business Environment in Kosovo–Incen...Niall Ardill
The document analyzes the effects of the 2013 Brussels Agreement on the business environment in Kosovo. It discusses both the direct and indirect impacts of the agreement. Indirectly, the agreement's inclusion of policing and judiciary reforms could positively impact economic growth if rule of law is strengthened. Infrastructure issues like energy and telecommunications sectors are also important to address. Directly, implementing customs revenue collection and creating a development fund may boost local economic development. However, slow implementation of the agreement's provisions has limited its economic impacts so far. The paper aims to provide recommendations to better realize the agreement's potential to incentivize business cooperation and economic growth across Kosovo.
This document is a newsletter from the GIZ Regional Economic Cooperation and Integration in Asia Programme. It provides updates on recent activities including study tours on cross-border cooperation, workshops on trade facilitation and social implications of economic integration, and an expert forum on cross-border cooperation and trade facilitation. It also summarizes recent trends in Asian regionalism from sources like the Asian Development Bank, Boao Forum for Asia, and Institute of Southeast Asian Studies. Upcoming events and new publications from the programme are listed.
China has become the world's second largest economy and largest trading nation due to its growth rate of 7.7% in 2013 and opening of its economy through WTO membership in 2001. The EU and China now trade over €1 billion daily and their trade has increased dramatically in recent decades, with the EU as China's largest supplier but also running a large trade deficit due to imports in sectors like machinery. While barriers remain for EU companies in China, the rapidly growing Chinese market also presents major opportunities for increased EU exports to serve China's rising middle class.
The document discusses Moldova's ongoing negotiations with the EU for a Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Agreement (DCFTA). It provides context on the EU's Eastern Partnership initiative and explains that a DCFTA goes beyond simply reducing tariffs to integrate countries across all trade-related areas like services, intellectual property, and regulations. For Moldova, the key benefits of a DCFTA would be increased foreign investment, technological upgrading, and more competitive exports internationally. The document notes that Moldova has made significant progress in its reforms and appears to be moving faster than Ukraine in DCFTA negotiations.
Presentation for european georgian sme year 2018 presentation tblisi 3 draft...Günther Fehlinger
This document discusses strategies for Georgia to advance economically through small and medium enterprise (SME) policy reforms based on the European model. It recommends that Georgia (1) maximize adoption of EU regulations to accelerate integration, (2) join regional cooperation organizations like CEFTA to prepare for EU membership, and (3) develop consensus around an SME policy framework focused on competition to generate jobs and growth. The overall aim is for Georgia to integrate further with Europe and become the most competitive country in the EU.
Ethnic entrepreneurship - case study- Turin, ItalyThink Ethnic
This document provides a profile of Turin, Italy, including its population characteristics and urban economy. Some key points:
- Turin has experienced four waves of immigration since the 1970s, with the largest groups now coming from Romania, Morocco, Peru, Albania, China, and Egypt.
- Immigrants make up 13.4% of Turin's population and have increased by 76.5% in the last five years.
- Immigrants work in a variety of sectors but are highly concentrated in domestic labor, construction, and services.
- Ethnic associations provide support but have struggled to engage with policymaking.
- Turin is shifting from an automotive economy to knowledge/ICT and
Dragon News is a member magazine, published by the Editorial Committees of the Swedish Chamber of Commerce in Hong Kong and the Swedish Chamber of Commerce in China. The magazine is printed in 3,000 copies four times a year.
The document discusses the Central European Free Trade Agreement (CEFTA). CEFTA is a trade agreement between non-EU countries in Southeast Europe that aims to reduce tariffs and trade barriers. The original CEFTA agreement was signed in 1992 by Poland, Hungary, Czech Republic and Slovakia. All original members have since joined the EU. In 2006, CEFTA was expanded to include Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Moldova, Serbia, Montenegro, and Kosovo to establish a free trade zone in the region by 2010. CEFTA's objectives include the progressive liberalization of services, ensuring stable investment, opening government procurement markets, and protecting intellectual property.
The document discusses the European Union's trade policy and its role in the EU's 2020 strategy for growth. It argues that international trade is important for growth in Europe and around the world. The EU aims to complete ongoing trade deals and engage more closely with strategic partners like the US, China, and Japan to increase GDP by over 1% and create jobs. The policy seeks to reduce barriers to trade in goods, services, investment and public procurement while also ensuring fair competition and a level playing field.
The GR Forum is an annual conference that brings together professionals in public affairs, business leaders, policymakers, NGOs, and communications experts. It aims to promote ethical lobbying and networking between the private sector and government. Prior attendees include members of European and Ukrainian parliaments, heads of business associations, and corporate affairs directors. The forum discusses topics like developing relationships with government, international market opportunities, and legal frameworks. It provides a platform for stakeholders to share knowledge and ideas to influence public policy decisions in Central and Eastern Europe.
The GIZ supports regional economic integration in Asia through its Support for Economic Cooperation in Sub-Regional Initiatives in Asia (SCSI) program. The program works with sub-regional initiatives like the Greater Tumen Initiative and Pan Beibu Gulf Economic Cooperation to strengthen processes of regional integration between countries. The goal is to contribute to sustainable development in the region by promoting cross-border trade and investment, capacity building, and knowledge sharing. In the past, the program has provided training to public and private stakeholders to improve implementation of economic agreements and regional initiatives.
Quarterly newsletter with information on economic cooperation and integration in Asia from the GIZ programme Regional Economic Cooperation and Integration in Asia (RCI). In our newsletter we share information about our programme activities, and further input on the programme’s focus areas such as regionalism, trade facilitation and port cooperation in Asia.
Recent Developments in Exporting Agricultural Goods to China - Workshop on ASEAN-China Free Trade Agreement (ACFTA), Phnom Penh, Cambodia, 03 March 2017
South-South and Triangular Cooperation_Working PaperCarine Nsoudou
The document discusses the potential role of the ACP Group in South-South and Triangular Cooperation based on its history and composition. It notes that the ACP Group, comprised of African, Caribbean, and Pacific countries, was established in 1975 through the Georgetown Agreement to partner with the EU. The current Cotonou Agreement between the ACP Group and EU aims to reduce poverty through development cooperation, trade, and political dialogue. The ACP Group is involved in jointly managing development funds from the EU. Given its diverse membership and experience in different forms of development cooperation, the document argues that the ACP Group is well-positioned to play a central role in South-South and Triangular Cooperation by leveraging
Quarterly newsletter with information on economic cooperation and integration in Asia from the GIZ programme Regional Economic Cooperation and Integration in Asia (RCI). In our newsletter we share information about our programme activities, and further input on the programme’s focus areas such as regionalism, trade facilitation and port cooperation in Asia.
Globalization has led to increased interdependence between nations through the free movement of goods, services, capital and labor. Key factors driving globalization include reductions in transportation and communication costs as well as technological advancements. While globalization offers economic opportunities through expanded trade and access to new markets, it also poses challenges such as threats to local industries and concerns over the impacts on cultural identity. International organizations like the WTO, IMF and World Bank facilitate globalization through policies promoting open trade, financial cooperation and development assistance.
From 27 to 28 November 2013, the “Regional Economic Cooperation and Integration
(RCI) in Asia” Programme convened its second international expert forum on “Cross-border Cooperation and Trade Facilitation in Asia” in Bangkok, Thailand. This document summarises the purpose, themes and results of this event. Detailed information including the content of lectures and discussions can be retrieved from the respective summaries.
Quarterly newsletter with information on economic cooperation and integration in Asia from the GIZ programme Regional Economic Cooperation and Integration in Asia (RCI). In our newsletter we share information about our programme activities, and further input on the programme’s focus areas such as regionalism, trade facilitation and port cooperation in Asia.
This leaflet introduces our programme, informs about the general background and the specific approaches on regional economic cooperation and integration. It introduces the programme's focus areas and reports on results and prospects.
This document outlines the draft terms of reference for a second phase research study on the linkages between agricultural productivity, rural livelihoods, trade in agriculture, and trade facilitation and their impact on poverty reduction in Zambia as a landlocked country. The study aims to analyze recent trends, examine the complex relationships between these issues, generate new insights, and contribute to a policy framework to help Zambia achieve its Vision 2030 goals. It will cover economic and social profiles of agriculture, productivity trends, trade facilitation constraints, policy frameworks, and recommendations for stakeholders including government, donors, and civil society.
This document provides an analysis of financing needs and opportunities in the cultural and creative sector in Europe. It finds that cultural and creative industries (CCIs) face specific challenges in accessing finance due to their small size, lack of business skills, and difficulties valuing intangible assets. A wide range of financial instruments exist across Europe, including loans, guarantees, equity, tax incentives and grants. However, CCIs make limited use of these tools. The document recommends that local and regional authorities play a key role in developing tailored financial schemes for CCIs and improving relations between the sector and investors. Public support can help address market failures and trigger greater private investment in CCIs.
The role of multinational business in trade has always been very important—large firms account for the majority of international trade flows, and many if not most of these large firms will have establishments in multiple countries. These firms, obviously, are not in the development assistance business (although they may be contracted by governments to implement projects financed by Aid for Trade). This does not mean, however, that private companies do not contribute to building trade capacity in developing countries. To the contrary, many enterprises that have established operations in developing countries or that trade with developing countries make a major contribution to economic upgrading and local capacity building. Such activities are not captured by the term AFT – nor would it qualify as AFT – because the origin of the funds is private and the objective is generally to benefit/support the associated investments/operations. It nonetheless serves the same purpose. Indeed, it may have
greater success as a result of the need to demonstrate results vis-à-vis the firm’s shareholders, and can generate positive spillovers.
The document summarizes the role and functions of the Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP). ESCAP is the regional development arm of the United Nations and serves as the main economic and social development center for the UN in Asia and the Pacific. It has 53 member states and 9 associate member states. ESCAP provides strategic links between global and country-level programs and issues to support governments in the region. It is headquartered in Bangkok, Thailand.
This document summarizes the history of regional integration in Africa. It discusses how African governments have pursued many regional integration initiatives to address the challenges of small national markets and fragmented geography. However, these initiatives have had poor implementation despite ambitious targets. The traditional paradigm of linear market integration focusing on border measures may not be appropriate for Africa, as supply-side constraints may be more important barriers. A deeper integration agenda addressing behind-the-border issues could more effectively help overcome national constraints.
This document outlines draft terms of reference for a second phase research study on the linkages between agricultural productivity, rural livelihoods, trade in agriculture, and trade facilitation in Malawi. The study aims to examine these complex relationships using a holistic framework in order to generate insights and recommendations to contribute to Malawi's goals of poverty reduction and achieving its Vision 2030 development objectives. It will analyze trends, policies, stakeholders and capacities related to agriculture, trade, rural employment and livelihoods. The findings will be shared through national dialogues and an international conference to advocate for evidence-based policymaking in these areas.
The speaker advocated transforming China's urbanization model from scale-oriented to population-based urbanization to promote more inclusive growth. Scale-oriented urbanization is becoming unsustainable due to resource constraints, social and environmental costs. Population urbanization could double urbanization rates and boost consumption and services. A priority is reforming China's hukou system to integrate migrant workers into cities and access public services. This would avoid social tensions. Land and welfare reforms were also recommended to support population urbanization. The household registration system should transition to a residence permit system within 5-8 years nationwide.
Benin republic cross border biz (slideshare)Ndudi Osakwe
Celebration of the Jubilee year of political independence is in the air for many African countries. Benin has celebrated hers and Nigeria’s is in the horizon as it celebrates her independence from Britain this October.
The Jubilee Year of political independence provides a basis for stock taking on how well the peoples of Benin and Nigeria have fared and the way forward for the two countries with somewhat common heritage but for the partition.
This involves the envisioning of programs that would enhance connectivity, improving competitiveness and the promotion of a greater sense of community.
Analysis of the Monetary Systems and International Finance with .docxgreg1eden90113
Analysis of the Monetary Systems and International Finance with Focus on China and Singapore
Name
Institutional Affiliation
Analysis of the Monetary Systems and International Finance with Focus on China and Singapore
Regional Economic Integration and Economic Cooperation
The Asian region is among the leading international economic powerhouses due to its economic potential and size with countries such as China and Singapore dominating the region. Nonetheless, the capacity constraints in various Asian nations and the diversity of the continent complicate the efforts to create a unified market in the Far East. Achieving success in Asia's regional economic integration requires high commitment levels among the member countries in addition to the effective implementation of various initiatives to facilitate economic cooperation (Rillo & Cruz, 2016). I consider China and Singapore as significant players in the global and Asian economies due to their volumes of traded goods and investments in their local and foreign markets. For instance, China leads in the Asian continent, and its economy is the second largest in the world based on its nominal gross domestic product as an indicator of market performance. On the other hand, Singapore's highly developed economy is among the most rapidly growing in the world, and this has allowed the country from a third-world nation into a developed country in about five decades. I also observe that variations scope and breadth exist in regional economic integration, and the economic integration in the East Asia region initially assumed a market-oriented cooperation process before transforming into an economic integration drive.
My understanding is that a trade bloc refers to a form of an agreement between different governments that reduce or eliminate trade barriers to increase trade volumes among the member states. I have also learned that the trade blocs can exist as independent agreements between specific countries or form components of regional organizations. The trade blocs can further be categorized as monetary and economic unions, common markets, customs unions, free trade areas, and preferential trading areas. In Asia, the intergovernmental agreements have resulted in some regional trade agreements as well as the formation of the ASEAN trading bloc. I noted that China and Singapore are currently members of the Association of South-East Nations trading block alongside eight other countries in Southeast Asia. The primary objectives of ASEAN include the facilitation of sociocultural, educational, military, political, and economic integration as well as promoting intergovernmental cooperation in the region (Berman & Haque, 2015). The first stated aim of ASEAN is enhancing the competitiveness of the region in the international market as a production base by eliminating non-tariff and tariff barriers within the member states. The second aim of ASEAN is increasing the volume of FDI's to the Southeast Asia .
In December 2017 the Support for Economic Cooperation in Sub-Regional Initiatives in Asia (SCSI) Programme of Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH condened a workshop on SPS Challenges and Opportunities in Exporting Agricultural Goods to China in Beijing, China with participants from Cambodia, Lao PDR, Viet Nam and China
Similar to European Experiences of Cross-Border Cooperation (20)
SCSI Presentation on Mongolia’s Regional Integration in Northeast Asia at the National Mongolian University's Conference: Regional Integration and Trade Policy
Supporting implementation of World Trade Organisation (WTO) Trade Facilitation Agreement (TFA) with the Global and German Alliance for Trade Facilitation for a higher involvment of the Private Sector in trade facilitation Projects.
Presentation on the occasion of the 5th GTI NEA Local Cooperation Committee Meeting and the Logistics Sub-Committee Meeting in Heihe, PR China, 16 August 2017.
This document summarizes Christine Wieck's presentation on facilitating safe agricultural trade based on experiences from EU integration. The presentation outlines how agricultural trade has increased over time but safety regulations create transaction costs. It discusses strategies countries use to cooperate on food safety standards, from coordination and equivalence to harmonization. The EU provides an example of deep integration where food law has gradually harmonized over 28 countries to establish a single market and common food safety system while balancing trade and health.
This document discusses GIZ's approaches to agricultural standards and regional cooperation. It provides two examples of GIZ projects: 1) The Standards in the South-East Asian Food Trade (SAFT) project which aims to align ASEAN food quality standards with international standards to facilitate trade. 2) The Sustainable Agrifood Systems in the ASEAN Region (SAS) project which works to advance agrifood sectors along entire value chains and ensure safe, affordable food. It concludes that regional cooperation can help address issues like inconsistent food regulations and realizes opportunities through projects involving stakeholders from the public and private sectors.
Regional Infrastructure Investment Initiatives: Zero-Sum Game or Win-Win Collaboration? - Proceedings of the Roundtable Meeting on 11-12 September 2015 in Hangzhou, PR China
This document provides an analysis of potential for development and cooperation in ports and logistics in the ASEAN-China Pan-Beibu Gulf (ACPBG) region. It summarizes previous studies on topics like the ASEAN-China Free Trade Agreement and cargo transport models. It also includes an in-depth examination of hinterland connections, market analyses of countries in the region, and competitive analyses of selected ports. Finally, it proposes specific areas for cooperation like cluster formation, skills development, and environmental protection, and provides roadmaps and estimates of the potential welfare effects of cooperation.
On 25-26 August 2014, the „Regional Economic Cooperation and Integration (RCI) in Asia“ Programme of Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH convened a conference on „Special Economic Zones in a Regional and Global Context - Economic Significance and Impact” in Shanghai, China. The conference was a two-day event aiming at exchange and discussion of the current scientific discourse on SEZ in respective home countries among policy makers and academia from PR China, Mongolia, and ASEAN member states. Moreover, renowned international experts shared a global perspective on the subject.
The welcoming remarks kicked off the study tour and training on regional best practices of single window implementation and business process analysis in Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan. Representatives from the host country's Single Window State Entity welcomed the participants and emphasized the importance of regional knowledge sharing and learning from each other's experiences in implementing single window systems. The objective of the event was to provide both theoretical training and practical insights into business process analysis as a tool for trade facilitation and single window design, as well as an overview of Kyrgyzstan's single window system as an example for participants to learn from. Regional cooperation and capacity building were highlighted as key goals to strengthen smaller countries' engagement in facilitating trade.
Savan-Seno SEZ
- Located in Savannakhet province, it was Lao's first experimental SEZ approved in 2002.
- Focuses on industry, trade, services, and logistics.
- Considered one of the most progressed zones according to Lao authorities.
On 26 November 2014, the "Regional Economic Cooperation and Integration (RCI) in Asia" Programme of Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH held an Expert Hearing and Roundtable on "Port Cooperation in the Pan-Beibu Gulf Region" in Bangkok, Thailand. In the scope of the workshop a study conducted by Hamburg Port Consulting (HPC) was presented and benefits as well as challenges of maritime cooperation in the region were discussed. This document summarises the objective, main themes and results of this event.
The launching of a Free Trade Zone (FTZ) in Shanghai on September 29, 2013 attracted a great deal of attention around the globe. The first Hong Kong-like free trade area in mainland China was personally endorsed by Premier Li Keqiang and is set to promote trade and encourage foreign investment in the country’s tightly regulated service industry. To contribute to a better understanding of the Shanghai FTZ model this paper gives an overview of the implementation process as well as it's underlying guiding principles and legislations.
On 7 and 8 August 2013, the “Regional Economic Cooperation and Integration (RCI) in Asia” Programme of Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH in cooperation with the “Secretariat of Pan-Beibu Gulf Economic Cooperation (China)” held a workshop on "Project Management of Cross-border Cooperation: European Experiences" in Nanning, People's Republic of China. The purpose of the workshop was twofold. Firstly, it aimed at familiarizing participants from PBG member countries with the initiation, planning, management and financing of cross-border cooperation projects as well as the specifics of modes of cooperation, such as formation, legal bases, added value, and difficulties. The second objective of the workshop was to discuss opportunities and challenges of cross-border cooperation in Asia. This report summarises the main themes and results of this event.
On 16 October 2013, the programme “Regional Economic Cooperation and Integration (RCI) in Asia” of Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH in collaboration with the International Organization for Migration (IOM) convened a workshop on “Social Implications of Economic Integration: Managing Cross-Border Labour Migration on a Regional Scale” in Phnom Penh, Cambodia. The workshop aimed to address the demand for capacity development and deepened dialogue between relevant line ministries and key stakeholders engaged in labour migration related issues in Cambodia. This report summarises the purpose, main themes and results of this event.
More from GIZ Project Support of Regional Economic Cooperation in Asia (SRECA) (20)
Contributi dei parlamentari del PD - Contributi L. 3/2019Partito democratico
DI SEGUITO SONO PUBBLICATI, AI SENSI DELL'ART. 11 DELLA LEGGE N. 3/2019, GLI IMPORTI RICEVUTI DALL'ENTRATA IN VIGORE DELLA SUDDETTA NORMA (31/01/2019) E FINO AL MESE SOLARE ANTECEDENTE QUELLO DELLA PUBBLICAZIONE SUL PRESENTE SITO
This report explores the significance of border towns and spaces for strengthening responses to young people on the move. In particular it explores the linkages of young people to local service centres with the aim of further developing service, protection, and support strategies for migrant children in border areas across the region. The report is based on a small-scale fieldwork study in the border towns of Chipata and Katete in Zambia conducted in July 2023. Border towns and spaces provide a rich source of information about issues related to the informal or irregular movement of young people across borders, including smuggling and trafficking. They can help build a picture of the nature and scope of the type of movement young migrants undertake and also the forms of protection available to them. Border towns and spaces also provide a lens through which we can better understand the vulnerabilities of young people on the move and, critically, the strategies they use to navigate challenges and access support.
The findings in this report highlight some of the key factors shaping the experiences and vulnerabilities of young people on the move – particularly their proximity to border spaces and how this affects the risks that they face. The report describes strategies that young people on the move employ to remain below the radar of visibility to state and non-state actors due to fear of arrest, detention, and deportation while also trying to keep themselves safe and access support in border towns. These strategies of (in)visibility provide a way to protect themselves yet at the same time also heighten some of the risks young people face as their vulnerabilities are not always recognised by those who could offer support.
In this report we show that the realities and challenges of life and migration in this region and in Zambia need to be better understood for support to be strengthened and tuned to meet the specific needs of young people on the move. This includes understanding the role of state and non-state stakeholders, the impact of laws and policies and, critically, the experiences of the young people themselves. We provide recommendations for immediate action, recommendations for programming to support young people on the move in the two towns that would reduce risk for young people in this area, and recommendations for longer term policy advocacy.
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
About Potato, The scientific name of the plant is Solanum tuberosum (L).Christina Parmionova
The potato is a starchy root vegetable native to the Americas that is consumed as a staple food in many parts of the world. Potatoes are tubers of the plant Solanum tuberosum, a perennial in the nightshade family Solanaceae. Wild potato species can be found from the southern United States to southern Chile
Synopsis (short abstract) In December 2023, the UN General Assembly proclaimed 30 May as the International Day of Potato.
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
The Antyodaya Saral Haryana Portal is a pioneering initiative by the Government of Haryana aimed at providing citizens with seamless access to a wide range of government services
Monitoring Health for the SDGs - Global Health Statistics 2024 - WHOChristina Parmionova
The 2024 World Health Statistics edition reviews more than 50 health-related indicators from the Sustainable Development Goals and WHO’s Thirteenth General Programme of Work. It also highlights the findings from the Global health estimates 2021, notably the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on life expectancy and healthy life expectancy.
Working with data is a challenge for many organizations. Nonprofits in particular may need to collect and analyze sensitive, incomplete, and/or biased historical data about people. In this talk, Dr. Cori Faklaris of UNC Charlotte provides an overview of current AI capabilities and weaknesses to consider when integrating current AI technologies into the data workflow. The talk is organized around three takeaways: (1) For better or sometimes worse, AI provides you with “infinite interns.” (2) Give people permission & guardrails to learn what works with these “interns” and what doesn’t. (3) Create a roadmap for adding in more AI to assist nonprofit work, along with strategies for bias mitigation.
A Guide to AI for Smarter Nonprofits - Dr. Cori Faklaris, UNC Charlotte
European Experiences of Cross-Border Cooperation
1. Support for Economic Regional Integration of Sub-Regional Initiatives in Asia
European Experiences of Cross-Border Cooperation
Elaborated by Jens Gabbe, Chairman of the AEBR Advisory Committee,
in the context of the
3rd
Meeting of the Greater Tumen Initiative’s NEA Local Cooperation Committee
7th
of August 2015, Choibalsan City, Mongolia
2. As a federally owned enterprise, we support the German Government in achieving itsobjectives
in the field of international cooperation for sustainable development.
Published by:
Deutsche Gesellschaft für
Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH
Registered offices
Bonn and Eschborn, Germany
T +49 228 44 60-0 (Bonn)
T +49 61 96 79-0 (Eschborn)
Friedrich-Ebert-Allee 40
53113 Bonn, Germany
T +49 228 44 60-0
F +49 228 44 60-17 66
Dag-Hammarskjöld-Weg 1-5
65760 Eschborn, Germany
T +49 61 96 79-0
F +49 61 96 79-11 15
E info@giz.de
I www.giz.de
Name of the programme
Support for Economic Cooperation in Sub-Regional Initiatives in Asia
Programme office
TaYuan Diplomatic Office
14 Liangmahe South Street, Chaoyang District
10600 Beijing, PR China
T +86-10-8532-5344
F +86-10-8532-5744
E rci-asia@giz.de
Author:
Jens Gabbe
Magnus Brod, Anke Scholz
Items from named contributors do not necessarily reflect the views of the company/the editors.
Photo credits
Association of European Border Regions (AEBR) 2011
Maps
Association of European Border Regions (AEBR) 2011
The geographical mapsare for informational purposes only and do not constitute recognition of international boundaries or regions; GIZ
makes no claims concerning the validity, accuracy or completeness of the maps nor assumes any liability resulting from the use of the
information therein.
Beijing, 04.08.2015
3. 1
Table of Contents
Table of Abbreviations................................................................................................................ 2
About this Paper......................................................................................................................... 3
1. Thematic Introduction to Cross-Border Cooperation............................................................... 4
2. European Experiences with Cross-Border Cooperation........................................................ 10
2.1. Historical Overview of Cross-Border Cooperation in Europe.............................................. 10
2.2. Characteristics of Current Cross-Border Cooperation in Europe........................................ 13
2.3. The Emergence of the AEBR as the Cross-Border Lobbying Organisation in Europe........ 15
2.4. The Emergence of INTERREG as Europe’s Cross-Border Funding Mechanism ............... 16
3. Added Value of Cross-border Cooperation........................................................................... 19
4. Examples of Cross-border Cooperation................................................................................ 20
5. Conclusions.......................................................................................................................... 21
6. Recommendations for the Greater Tumen Region ............................................................... 23
Glossary................................................................................................................................... 26
About the Author ...................................................................................................................... 28
GIZ Programme “Support for Economic Cooperation in Sub-Regional Initiatives in Asia”......... 29
4. 2
Table of Abbreviations
AEBR Association of European Border Regions
EEC European Economic Community
EU European Union
EURATOM European Atomic Energy Committee
GIZ Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GmbH)
GTI Greater Tumen Initiative
LCC Local Cooperation Committee
NEA Northeast Asia
NGO Non-Governmental Organisation
SME Small and Medium Enterprises
SWOT Analysis Analysis of Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats
(See the Glossary for details.)
5. 3
About this Paper
On 7 August 2015, the Government of Dornod Aimag hosted the Greater Tumen Initiative’s (GTI)
3rd
Meeting of the Northeast Asia Local Cooperation Committee (LCC) Meeting in Choibalsan,
Mongolia. Within the GTI framework, the LCC is the leading cooperation mechanism between local
government bodies in the Tumen region and encompasses the Chinese provinces of Heilongjiang,
Jilin, Liaoning and Inner Mongolia; the Mongolian Aimags of Dornod, Sükhbaatar, and Khentii;
Tottori prefecture of Japan; the Russian Federation’s Primorsky territory; as well as Gangwon
province of the Republic of Korea.
The LCC provides a platform for communication and cooperation among the participating
government bodies. It thereby helps to close cooperation gaps between national, regional and local
policies, and to foster economic growth, especially in border areas. Apart from the delegates of the
participating regions, international organisations as well as representatives from shipping and
logistics companies attended the meeting and discussed regional connectivity and other areas of
local cooperation. Back to back with the LCC Meeting, the Northeast Asia Local Development
Forum was held under the title “Cross-Border Trade Facilitation: Opportunities and Challenges at
Local Level”.
Both meetings provided a unique platform for the exchange of knowledge concerning cross-border
cooperation between provincial and local governments. In this light, the “Support for Economic
Cooperation in Sub-regional Initiatives in Asia” Programme of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für
Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) commissioned Mr. Jens Gabbe to provide an overview of
cross-border cooperation in Europe in order to transfer best practices and policy recommendations
to the decision makers in Northeast Asia. This paper is thus part of the ongoing support of the GIZ
– on behalf of the German Government – to GTI as a sub-regional organisation in Northeast Asia,
andtothe LCC as a mechanism of cooperation between local governments in the region in
particular.
6. 4
1. Thematic Introductionto Cross-Border Cooperation
In Europe, cross-border cooperation is understood as cooperation between regional and/or
local authorities in neighbouring areas along a state border. Border and cross-border regions
differ from one another with respect to their contextual features (physical/natural framework
conditions, demographic situation and population density, socio-economic structure, overall level of
development etc.). As well as with regard to various aspects which characterise cross-border
cooperation (i.e. legal framework conditions, permanently established cross-border structures,
geographic size, actors involved etc.).
The growing extent of the exchange of goods and the movement of labour, services, capital and
people within the European Union (EU) as well as in other parts of the world particularly affects
border and cross-border regions as their domestically and often also regionally peripheral location
frequently leads to imbalances when compared to the degree of economic development in more
central regions. Economic centres in border areas are often partially cut off from their natural
hinterland on the other side of the border, which effectively distorts the structure of trade and
services. A well-developed cross-border infrastructure and accompanying regional connections on
both sides of a border – i.e., the physical conditions of cross-border cooperation – were typically
created decades after their domestic counterparts.
As a result, specific problems continue to particularly challenge border regions which are
exemplified in the box below.
Box 1: Examples of Border Region Specific Problems
• Different administrative structures and competences;
• Dissimilar fiscal and social legislation;
• Different spatial planning and planning laws;
• Varying environmental and waste legislation;
• Currency disparities;
• Difficulties in establishing cooperation amongst small and medium-sized enterprises due to
them requiring cross-border supplier and sales markets which only develop with time;
• Differences in transport systems which are consequently not geared to the requirements of
the cross-border trade;
• Diverging labour markets, wage structures and social systems;
• Imbalance of investments in the service sector due to legal and financial barriers; and
• Prejudices against, stereotypes of, and inadequate empathy and understanding for cultural
differences between neighbouring countries.
7. 5
Socio-cultural and economic cohesion; and
Intensity of cross-border cooperation
Especially the private sector has to struggle with suchlike problems due to the frequent lack of
knowledge concerning market access, export opportunities and marketing resources on the other
side of the border. Consequently, companies are frequently challenged not only by the limited
possibilities of exploiting research and development, but also by crowding-out effects which result
from more competitive conditions on the other side of the border. However, enterprises located in
border regions can concurrently benefit from their proximity to a foreign market if this enables them
to access cheaper supplies and qualified labour force from across the border, or export their goods
with high profits due to its short distance to the neighbouring country. But suchlike benefits can
only be achieved if enterprises are aware of the potentials in their neighbouring area. This is often
considered a challenge for small and medium enterprises (SMEs).
Decisive for the quality of the cooperation is the degree of cross-border integration which, in turn, is
the result of two closely inter-related aspects:
Economic cohesion depends on the intensity and quality of border-crossing economic contacts
and the extent to which a cross-border labour market exists. A high level of economic cohesion is
typically based on long-standing trade links and well-developed cross-border economic activities.
Another factor is the existence of a jointly pursued cross-border economic development process
which seeks to realise functional complementarities between the individual border areas in
question. Such a process is further reinforced by a well-developed cross-border labour market
within which commuting represents an important segment of day-to-day border-crossing contacts
among individuals and thereby contributes to increased inter-cultural learning and understanding. If
these aspects are not or only partially developed, a less well-developed cross-border economic
cohesion can be observed. Moreover, a rather separate economic development of the individual
neighbouring regions and often also economic competition between them is likely to be found.
Decentralised cross-border cooperation enhances the territorial integration of the concerned
cross-border areas by making them function in a way that comes close to what is normally
experienced in a domestic context. An important instrument which helps border and cross-border
regions to progress towards a suchlike state of affairs is the following elaboration of decentralised
cross-border development strategies.
8. 6
• Spatial development planning is a competency of national states, provinces, and autonomous
regions. Accordingly, spatial planning documents contain remarks on the importance of cross-
border cooperation only in their introductory part – that is if they contain them at all. Moreover,
important transport links or major cities are rarely considered in respective maps. As there are
no competences in spatial planning across borders, there is no reference made to cross-border
cooperation or cross-border development potentials in the important chapters which focus on
sector policies.
• This is the reason why decentralised cross-border development concepts need to be
elaborated. European examples in this context are the EuRegio Salzburg – Berchtesgardener
Land – Taunstein and the Øresundskomiteen (see No. 102 and No. 1, respectively, on the map,
page 8-9; also, see the Glossary for details). In contrast to national plans, these concepts are
legally not binding, yet they indicate the cross-border dependencies and development
possibilitiesof each sector policy.
• The aim of a decentralised cross-border development strategy is to specify the main goals of
cross-border cooperation for the following 15-20 years, thereby defining the added value of the
cooperation, and ensuring that cooperation across borders is not limited to mere funding
programmes such as INTERREG A (see Glossary).
• While realising such a strategy, the relevant stakeholders in cross-border regions can be
involved in many ways: they can set the initiative in motion, they can motivate other
stakeholders on both sides of the border to join the initiative, they can call in political support,
and they can facilitate the coordination of the entire implementation process.
• Also, the drafting of a profound cross-border study containing a SWOT analysis (see Glossary)
is of major importance to the success of cross-border cooperation. Such an analysis needs to
be based on clear targets and specified practical needs which should bedefined by all relevant
stakeholders from within the region. The analysis should include both quantitative and
qualitative research.
• It is important that the analysis is focused not only on transport infrastructure and economic
environment, but also on their long-term socio-economic development impact on cross-border
cooperation. Also, the exchange of knowledge concerning differences in national administrative
structures and the legal conditions needs to be considered.
• A cross-border development strategy only makes sense if it is a long-term strategy which
equally respects all the involved sectors. However, the implementation process should
concurrently be focused on selected key issues.
• It is important that a suchlike strategy is designed in a transparent manner. It should not be
elaborated behind closed doors by experts alone. Instead all partners and stakeholders that can
positively contribute to the success of the project – including NGO’s – have to be involved from
the very beginning. Also, at the political level, all national, regional and local parties, as well as
the responsible domestic authorities have to be involved. In doing so, all nationally available
knowledge can be utilised for cross-border projects, while the establishment of unnecessarily
large management structures can concurrently be avoided.
9. 7
• In this way, all the necessary partnerships for the successful implementation of a cross-border
development strategy are established both externally – that is nationally and regionally – and
internally – that is between all the relevant stakeholders –, so that no conflicts about
competences arise. However, the continued engagement of the relevant domestic bodies in the
implementation process has to be ensured as there is the risk of them trying to avoid
responsibility due to financial reasons. Moreover, all stakeholders should continue their active
cooperation in working groups in order to thereby support the development of good projects with
their knowledge and experience. Suchlike cooperation ensures a firm positioning of the
development strategy within the region as well as the citizens’ active involvement therein.
• The central political level should only be involvedin the final stage of the debates concerning
cross-border development projects. However, it is advisable to review and update affected
national plans regularly as they are not only impacted by suchlike projects, but also impact
future cross-border strategies.
Figure 1: Exemplified Overview of Decentralised Development Strategies
Source: Illustration based on AEBR 2015.
12. 10
2. European Experiences with Cross-Border Cooperation
After first providing an overview of the history of cross-border cooperation in Europe, this chapter
will then depict some of its present-day characteristics. In this context, the emergence of the
Association of European Border Regions as the cross-border lobbying organisation in Europe and
the emergence of INTERREG as the European cross-border funding mechanism will be particularly
highlighted.
2.1. Historical Overview of Cross-Border Cooperation in Europe
Europe is characterised by its diverse, yet shared culture and history – as well as its multitude
of borders. Like scars of history, they often separate regions and ethnic groups which would
actually belong together. In the 1950s, regional and local representatives from border regions
along the Rhine River and in Scandinavia got together to discuss the dismantling of their borders.
This step was taken to counteract these historically grown problems and thereby eliminate their
negative impact on businesses and development in border regions. These efforts were facilitated
by the growing process of European Unification, which has been experienced by the border
regions’ inhabitants at first hand. This is true for both past disadvantages which had resulted from
different national structures, competences, tax laws, social laws etc. and thereby hindered
cooperation in various aspects, including the acknowledgment of qualifications, hospital access
and emergency services, as well as today’s advantages, particularly the free movement of people,
goods, services and capital.
The process of European Unification has been greatly supported and promoted by the concept
of Euroregions. In fact, border regions showcase the human factor of European Integration by
putting cooperation into practice as the will to cooperate is vitally necessary in these geographic
areas. Consequently, a mere “back-to-back” co-existence was transformed into a “face-to-face”
relationship across borders. Thereby barriers and impediments, which had previously been
imposed by borders, were dismantled. This is why the development of cross-border cooperation
has been paralleling European integration processesfor over five decades, as can be seen in the
following table.
13. 11
Table 1: Overview of the Interconnectedness of European Integration and Cross-Border Cooperation
European Integration European Cross-Border Cooperation
1952 Treaty of Paris, establishing the
European Coal and Steel Community
(ECSC) between Belgium, (Western)
Germany, France, Italy, Luxembourg,
and the Netherlands, was signed.
1958 The Treaties of Rome, establishing the
European Economic Community (EEC)
and the European Atomic Energy
Committee (EURATOM), were signed.
1958 The first cross-border organisation, the
EUREGIO, was established, between
Germany and the Netherlands (regional and
local members).
1970 The European Commission was allowed
to be increasingly financed through
itsown resources.
Greater supervisory powers was given
to the European Parliament.
1970-
1972
At Anholt Castle (EUREGIO), the “Association
of European Border Regions (AEBR)” was
established (1971).
The 1
st
Conference on European Border
Regions took place in Strasbourg (1972).
The first cross-border action programme,
called EUREGIO, in Europe was launched
(1972).
1989/
1990
The Iron Curtain and with it the Berlin
Wall fell; Germany became reunited.
1988-
1990
AEBR developed a concept for a multi-annual
special EU-aid Programme for border regions
(INTERREG).
INTERREG started – and has remained in
existence until today.
1991 The Maastricht Treaty on the European
Union (EU) came into force (1993).
A single European market was
established.
1990-
2003
LACE was established by AEBR as the
“European observatory of cross-border
cooperation”.
1999/
2002
11 EU countries adopted one single
currency, the Euro (introduced 2002).
The European Central Bank became
responsible for Europe’s monetary
policy. The European Council decided
to make the EU an area of freedom,
security and justice.
The EURO was introduced as the
common currency in Europe.
2001 Studies on “Institutional Aspects of Cross-
Border Cooperation” and “Cross-Border
Financial Management”, as well as a “Practical
Guide to Cross-Border Cooperation” were
published.
14. 12
2003 The Treaty of Nice came into force,
changing the EU decision-making
system and giving more power to the
European Parliament.
2001-
2004
A study on behalf of the Committee of the
Regions, “Trans-European Cooperation
between Territorial Authorities”, was published.
A study onbehalf of the EU-Commission,
called “A legal Instrument for decentralized
territorial cooperation” was published.
The EU legal instrument European
Grouping of Territorial Cooperation(2006)
was adopted.
2011 The “Europe 2020” Strategy was
launched.
2010 The concept of “Territorial Cohesion”was
introduced to the EU as a new and additional
goal in the context of economic and social
cohesion.
Border regions became the key player in
territorial cooperation.
15. 13
2.2. Characteristics of Current Cross-Border Cooperation in Europe
Today, we experience a new quality of borders as they have come to represent spaces where
people and businesses meet. Consequently, the goal of cross-border cooperation is to develop
structures, procedures and instruments that facilitate cooperation.
Decisive for the success of cross-border cooperation is the political will of national
governments, regional and local authorities, as well as the political support of national,
regional and local politicians. Today, more than 200 border and cross-border regions exist all
over Europe (see the map, page 8-9). These cross-border structures can vary considerably in
regard of their functions, capacities (technical, financial, decision-making) and purpose. The most
common types of cross-border structures in the European context are:
The oldest Euroregion and thus the forerunner in cross-border cooperation is EUREGIO which is
located along the Dutch-German border (see No. 70 on the map, page 8-9). Not only was
EUREGIO the first Euroregion with an effective decision-making body, a jointly staffed secretariat,
and an independent budget, but it also facilitated the realisation of the first cross-border action
programme within Europe. Due to EUREGIO’s joint strategy and political pressure,
largeinfrastructure projects, especially in the context of highway construction, could thus
becompleted much faster than previously expected.
Based on these experiences, the following box shows the organisation, method and content of
cross-border cooperation of Euroregions and similar structures.
Euroregions, which typically represent properly constituted legal entities, are multi-purpose
and have their own financial resources as well as extensive capacities. Many of them play a
central role in the development and management of EU-Programmes.
Working Communities, which are based on working agreements, have limited capacities,
normally lack own financial resources, and are rarely involved in the management of EU-
Programmes.
16. 14
Box 2: Overview of the Functioning of Euroregions and Similar Structures
Organisation
• Centralisation of regional and local authorities from both sides of the border, sometimes in
the form of a parliamentary assembly;
• Existence of a permanent secretariat and administrative staff; and
• Constitution as either a national association or a foundation by both sides of the border in
accordance to the respective public law.
Method of working
• Joint development and strategy-oriented cooperation, no measures based on individual
cases;
• Mutually beneficial cross-border orientation of joint projects;
• Efficiency-oriented mode of operations, adding no new administrative level;
• Hub for all kinds of cross-border relations: between citizens, between political and
administrative structures, between institutions and businesses, etc.;
• Balancing between different legal and administrative structures on both sides of the border
and with regard to multi-cultural environments;
• Vertical partnership cooperation on the European, governmental, regional, and local level,
as well as horizontal partnership cooperation across borders;
• Implementation of decisions concerning cross-border affairs at the national level and in
accordance to procedures applicable on both sides of the border, thereby avoiding conflicts
over competences and structural power;
• Ensuring the participation of citizens, institutions and social partners within cross-border
programmes, projects and decision-making processes; and
• Direct initiatives and utilisation of own resources as preconditions for the help and support
of third parties.
Content of cross-border cooperation
• Definition of key sectors according to joint interests, e.g. infrastructure, business, culture;
• Equal emphasis on social-cultural and economic-infrastructural cooperation;
• Implementation of treaties, agreements and regulations concluded at the European level or
between countries in order to achieve cross-border appliance; and
• Advice, assistance and co-ordination of cross-border cooperation, particularly in the
following fields:
•Economic development; •Tourism and leisure;
•Transport and traffic; •Agricultural development;
•Regional development; •Innovation and technology transfer
•Environmental protection •Education;
and nature conservation; •Social cooperation;
•Culture and sports; •Emergency services and
•Health; disaster prevention;
•Energy; •Communications;
•Waste disposal; •Public security.
17. 15
In summary, an Euroregion is an instrument for enhanced cooperation, designed to
facilitate the implementation of necessary tasks.
Although not all Euroregions are identical in their legal form and organisation, they share
somecommon characteristics. In fact, they all constitute permanent organisations which
possess a legal identity that clearly separates them from their respective members.
Moreover, they command own administrative, technical and financial resources, as well as
their own internal decision-making bodies and subsequent processes.
Necessary steps for establishing a Euroregion-type structure can be summarized as follows:
First, national associations of regional and/ or local authorities have to be formed on both sides of
the border for the specific purpose of cross-border cooperation in accordance to the respective
public law. Second, these associations then enter into an agreement concerning cross-border
cooperation. There like kinds of agreements are typically concluded under private law and cover at
least the following aspects: (1) All parties in the governing body shall be represented equally; (2)
All involved parties shall equally contribute to a common budget; and (3) A common secretariat
shall be set up and jointly financed. Moreover, the agreement can allow the participating public
authorities to transfer responsibilities and liabilities; however, constitutional rights or competences
are not to be transferred to the cross-border body.
2.3. The Emergence of the AEBR as the Cross-Border Lobbying Organisation in
Europe
By the 1970s, only few border und cross-border organisations existed in Europe. In fact, EUREGIO
was the only one possessing itsown financial resources and a full-time staff. Somewhat
consequential to this circumstance, it was within the EUREGIO framework that the Association of
European Border Regions (AEBR) was founded in Germany in 1971. Moreover, it was
EUREGIO which hosted and managed the AEBR’s Secretariat for a comparatively long time.
In accordance to its member countries’ respective political systems, views regarding the issue of
centralisation vs. decentralisation have differed quite considerably within the AEBR. Nevertheless,
AEBR presently encompasses about 100 members from all over Europe, thereby covering
approximately 180 border areas. It is the oldest European-wide association and the only one
dealing exclusively with cross-border cooperation. Its specified aims are (1) to clarify the particular
18. 16
problems, opportunities, tasks and projects of the regions in question; (2) to represent the regions’
overall interests vis-à-vis national and international parliaments, authorities and institutions; (3) to
initiate, support and coordinate their cooperation throughout Europe; (4) to exchange experiences
and information in order to formulate and coordinate common interests which stem from the
various problems and opportunities border regions are typically presented with, and to offer
solutions for these problems; and (5) to promote cross-border cooperation structures, projects and
programmes.
Having been particularly successful as the lobbying organisation of all border and cross-border
regions in Europe, AEBR caused the emergence of a multi-annual programme dedicated to the
financing of cross-border cooperation (INTERREG), separate regulations for territorial cooperation,
a legal instrument for cooperation based on European law, and theimplementation of a training
and adviceprogramme for all European border regions (inside and outside the EU) on behalf of
the European Commission.
2.4.The Emergence of INTERREG as Europe’s Cross-Border Funding Mechanism
With the realisation of the European Single Market, it became obvious that border regions can play
an important role as both bridges between the member states and laboratories for increased
European integration as approximately 40% of the European population lives in border areas. In
1990, together with AEBR and based on the association’spractical experience, the European
Commission established a multi-annual programme in order to financially assist and
accelerate cross-border cooperation: INTERREG. The first programme was exclusively
dedicated to cross-border cooperation. Later on, two other strands were established under the
umbrella of INTERREG: transnational and interregional cooperation. By now, all three strands are
referred to as“territorial cooperation”. In order to clarify the substance of the terms, they are
explicated below:
19. 17
Economic growth and job creation; and
Territorial cooperation.
Table 2: Clarification of INTERREG’s Three Strands
Cross-border cooperation Transnational cooperation Interregional cooperation
- Cooperation between regions
from two or more member
states which are located
directly at the border or
adjacent to them;
- Aiming to tackle common
challenges which had been
jointly identified by the border
regions;
- Exploiting the untapped
growth potentials in border
areas, while enhancing
cooperation processes for the
purpose of an overall
harmonious development of
the Union;
- Typically organized in a joint
structure between regional
and/or local authorities;
- Covering all areas of live and
involving all relevant
stakeholders;
- Existence of jointly developed
and financed projects; and
- Shared management and joint
decisions.
- Involving variousregions of
several EU member
countrieswhereby a bigger area
is formed;
- Aiming to promote better
cooperation and development
within the EU by providing a
joint approach to tackling
common issues;
- Cooperation in selected areas,
includinginnovation,
accessibility, environment, and
urban development;
- Providing studies, preparatory
work for concrete projects, and
the exchange of experience
between regions from different
states which are engaged in the
same geographic area;
- Involving stakeholder from the
national and sometimes
alsofrom the regional level.
- Pan- European cooperation
between regions coming from
all Member States;
- Networksdealing with one issue
eachwhich are defined by the
involved regional partners;
- Networks dedicated to
developing good practices and
facilitating the exchange and
transfer of experiences;
- No involvement in concrete
projects;
- Depending on the issue in
question,stakeholders other
than the regions themselves
may be involved.
INTERREG’s budget stems from the European Cohesion Policy which has two main goals:
While territorial cooperation has remained comparatively limited from a financial point of view
– accounting for only 2.8 % of the overall budget –, it constitutes a political objective of its own
within the EU whose importance has been growing continuously. In fact, its financial support
increased from 1.1 billion Euroin 1990 (11 Member States) to 10.1 billion Euro for the period 2014-
2020 (27 Member States). Presently, 108 Operational Programmes are being implemented of
which 88 are cross-border, 15 are transnational, and 4 are interregional cooperation projects.
Thus, the main pillar of territorial cooperation is cross-border cooperation which has been
20. 18
Ideally speaking, a project is cross-border in nature if partners on both sides of the
border participate in the project in terms of content, organization, staff and funding.
receiving more than 70 % of the total budget, while transnational cooperation still accounted for 2.1
billion Euro and interregional cooperation for 500 million Euro.
Additionally, the financial support which is givento the programmes and projects differs
according to their geographic reach. While the less developed regions have been granted about
75% of their financial needs, most of the other regions in Europe have been granted about 50%
thereof. The remaining proportion had to be co-financed by national, regional, and local
authorities or the project carriers.
When developing a cross-border project, special attention needs to be paid to its coherence
with the overall regional development, its cross-border significance, its effects on local businesses,
as well as the attractiveness of the production site. A few questions to guide decision-making
processes are presented in the box below:
Box 3: Guiding Questions for Cross-Border Development Decision-Making Processes
• Is the intended project based on a common regional and sectoral strategy such as joint
infrastructure, transport, economy, environment, tourism, or waste treatment?
• What is the project`s value in terms of job creation, SMEs, infrastructure, etc.?
• How could the project possibly develop? What is its viability in terms of cost-effectiveness,
jobs etc?
• What is the cross-border nature of the project?
• Is it a project with border significance or a genuinely cross-border project?
21. 19
3. Added Value of Cross-border Cooperation
The overall added value of cross-border cooperation is composed of various aspects, including
political, institutional, socio-economic, and socio-cultural added value, which will be shortly
introduced below.
The political added value of cross-border cooperation involves substantial contributions towards
(1) the development of a unified Europe and the fostering of European integration; (2) the process
of getting to know each other across borders whereby mutual understanding and trust are
increased; (3) the implementation of subsidiaries and partnerships; and (4) increased economic
and social cohesion and cooperation.
The institutional added value of cross-border cooperation entails the active involvement of
citizens, authorities, political and social groups on both sides of the border; (1) the
exchange of knowledge concerning one’s respective neighbouring countries; (2) long-term
cross-border cooperation within structures that are capable of working efficiently by taking
the form of either (a) a vertically and horizontally functioning partnership which represents
the basis of any kind of cross-border cooperation, despite having different structures and
areas of responsibility; or (b) a legally accepted target of aid and a working partner,
receiving and administering funds; and (3) the joint drafting, implementing and financing of
cross-border programmes and projects. In fact, experience gained throughout Europe shows
that jointly developed programmes and projects can be most effectively implemented and realised
if regional and local partners play a considerable role in the processes thereof.
The socio-economic added value becomes apparent in the respective regions, albeit in different
ways, through (1) the mobilisation of endogenous potentials by strengthening the regional
and local levels of administration as partners for and initiators of cross-border cooperation;
(2) the active participation of actors from the economic and social sectors – for example,
regional and/or local chambers of commerce, associations, companies, trade unions,
cultural and social institutions, environmental organisations, and tourism agencies – in
cross-border cooperation projects; (3) the opening-up of the labour market and the
subsequent harmonisation of professional qualifications; (4) additional development efforts
– for example in the fields of infrastructure, transport, tourism, environment, education,
research, and cooperation between small and medium-sized enterprises – and the
subsequent creation of more jobs in these areas; (5) lasting improvements in spatial
22. 20
development planning and regional policies; and (6) the improvement of the cross-border
transport infrastructure.
The socio-cultural added value of cross-border cooperation is reflected in (1) the lasting and
repeated dissemination of knowledge about the geographical, structural, economic, socio-
cultural and historical situation of cross-border regions; and (2) the increasing knowledge
of neighbouring countries’ languages and/or dialects due to them representing a
prerequisite for communication and thus cross-border cooperation and development.
Consequently, cultural cross-border cooperation should be understood as a constituent element of
regional development which is why a workable cross-border environment for business, trade and
services can only be established in the presence of socio-cultural cooperation.
4. Examples of Cross-border Cooperation
Hereinafter, some selected examples of the rich portfolio of European cross-border cooperation
experiences are presented which may serve as suggestions for future cross-border development
projects elsewhere:
• Joint development of cross-border spatial and development concepts;
• Creation of necessary cross-border infrastructure as inevitable physical precondition for
further cross-border cooperation in order to increase growth and employment;
• Promotion of growth and economic development in addition to respective developments at the
national levels through the creation of jobs across borders, and joint risk-capital fund;
• Creation of new cross-border business relationships between producers and suppliers
through networks created by the respective Chambers of Commerce;
• Creation of new cooperation and sales opportunities for SMEs – which typically operate
within a radius of some 200 km from their location – in border areas through the establishment
of cross-border entrepreneurship centres, investment networks and cross-border entrepreneur
forums, thereby assisting them in entering their neighbouring border region;
• Establishment of a cross-border labour market which offers not only additional employment
opportunities, but also adjustment payments for commuters that work across the border;
• Promotion of bilingual cross-border professional trainings;
• Establishment and improvement of cross-border public transport links such as buses and
railways for the benefit of citizens, commuters and tourists;
23. 21
• Development of cross-border tourism concepts and projects – including joint touristic
strategies, and joint touristic marketing and promotion activities, as well as the production of
bilingual tourist maps – through joint Tourism Service Centres;
• Improvement of scale economies through the enlargement of the catchment areas of
business activities and services on both sides of the border, thereby often providing the
necessary incentive for the initial establishment of these businesses and services, particularly in
regard to waste disposal, recycling and infrastructure facilities, but also research facilities and
universities;
• Improved efficiency of the use of public funds, for example through the establishment of joint
sewage plants and joint libraries, as well as cooperation in the health sector;
• Creation of additional technological synergies through joint research and innovation within joint
cross-border business parks;
• Creation of additional synergies and spin-off effects thanks to the cooperation of universities,
colleges of further education and other educational institutions;
• Improvement of the sustainability of cross-border management with regard to environment
and environmental protection;
• Establishment of a “new cross-border governance” model in the form of Euroregions and
similar structures which utilise subsidiarity, partnership, networks etc. in spite of the persistence
of different structures, competencies and laws on both sides of the border.
5. Conclusions
Cross-border cooperation has become more and more important forEurope; it is a political goal
and a priority of the European Union, a forerunner of European integration, and the
foundation of the European House with its substantial added value. The European experience
can serve as an example for other regions and sub-regions worldwide if certain prerequisites are
met.
Cross-border cooperation between two neighbouring regions along a border does not mean that
one partner initially acts alone at the national level and later on tries to involve or incorporate its
neighbour(s) in its activities. Instead,it means genuinely joint cooperation from the very
beginning which consequently encompasses all areas of every-day life, takes place on a
permanent basis, and equally involves all the relevant stakeholders from both sides of the
border, including private sector organisations, businesses, and the civil society. Also, cross-border
cooperation should be conducted on all levels: local, regional, national. In fact, cross-border
24. 22
cooperation at the local and regional level works best when well-functioning cross-border
structures and a strong partnership with the respective national governments have been
established. The main principles for establishing appropriate cross-border structures, which
have emerged from Europe’s long-time experience, are listed below.
However, in Northeast Asia, the geographical, historical, economic, social and political
preconditions for regional development and cross-border cooperation may differ strongly from
the European situation and its subsequent experiences. Huge distances, a lack of common border
control facilities, a comparatively weak infrastructure, as well as rather fragile economies in some
parts of Asia have a strong impact on the development of sustainable cooperation mechanisms
across borders.
The political will to develop cross-border cooperation in Europe is not only closely linked to the
supra-national integration process of the EU, but also to national and sub-national processes which
include partnerships, decentralisation processes, and bottom-up approaches. In Asia, national
governments seem to constitute the most important political players, while regions, provinces,
departments and municipalities have remained very much dependent on national governments in
terms of politics, finance and planning. A place-based approach for cross-border cooperation with
functioning structures like those in Europe is therefore currently still missing.
Cross-border structures should only be created in order to meet the needs of expanding
and deepening cooperation activities. They should not be the first step.
Cross-border structures with decision-making power should be based on equality between
the partners on both sides of the border, indifferent of their geographic size or population.
Diversity in competences, structures and legislation represents the most frequently
encountered barrier to cross-border cooperation as all joint decisions have to be implemented
within the respective national rules. Consequently, region-specific solutions have to be
found for each cross-border area individually.
Cross-border structures do not constitute new or additional administrative levels. Rather, they
are an instrument for increased cooperation across a border in spite of various
administrative or legal barriers.
Cross-border cooperation is not about competences, but about implementing necessary
cross-border tasks.
25. 23
6. Recommendations for the Greater Tumen Region
Cross-border cooperation could create a sustainable added value for economic development
in Asia and further stimulate the territorial integration of neighbouring areas along a
common border. In order for this to succeed, the “back-to-back” situation existing at many borders
has to be transformed into a “face-to-face” relationship, while existing national boundaries should
continue to be respected and national sovereignty rights should not be touched.
The realisation of mere “one-off” cooperation activities cannot be recommended as they
typically depend too much on the commitment of individuals or specific organisations, thereby
creating the danger that cooperation activities will be discarded once the people involved leave the
project or the organisation in charge accomplished its goals. One-off activities may be welcomed
only if they form part of a long-term regional strategy or a broader cross-border development
concept.
In contrast, the European experience shows that topical projects which establish lasting and
genuine cross-border cooperation as well as permanent cross-border structures with a
multi-thematic focus are more appropriate for channelling cooperation in a strategic way. This
also requires the establishment of a road map or an action plan with concrete projects in
order to give socio-economic development and territorial integration a strategic perspective.
Although cross-border cooperationin Europe cannot serve as a blueprint for cross-border
cooperation in Northeast Asia, some of its experiences can indeed be used for identifying
operational key principles that could guide the process of developing cooperation across Asian
borders. These operational key principles are listed in the following box.
26. 24
For this to be achieved, the following three-step process should be pursued:
To achieve Short-term objectives, concrete projects need to be elaborated, particularly
economic ones; partnerships need to be established;and a rather decentralised cooperation
needs to be implemented;
To achieve Mid-term objectives, national, regional, and local capacities for sustainable
cooperation need to be increased; joint strategies, programmes and projects need to be
elaborated; and cross-border institutions need to be strengthened through trainings; and
To achieve Long-term objectives, scenarios for national and regional integration processes
along the different borders in Asia need to be developed.
Cross-border cooperation in Northeast Asia should thus be implemented at the local,
regional and national level – i.e., by a place-based and multi-level governance approach –, in
close partnership with all economic and non–public civil society actors from the areas in
question and possibly also with the backing and active support from supra-national
organisations such as the GTI.
This process should further leave room for the growth of the sub-national level in
accordance with the specific challenges and tasks that may emerge throughout the subsequent
steps of the overall development cycle.
Box 4: Operational Key Principles of Successful Cross-Border Cooperation
• A step by step development approach with some concrete projectsshould be applied
(“first the task, then the structure”);
• The regional and local level should be involved from the very beginning and should
later on gradually take over responsibilities and tasks in cooperation with the national
authorities;
• A strategic and programmatic approach should be developed which has to be able to
guide future cooperation activities;
• Joint projects should be implemented through which the strategic and programmatic
approach is put into practice;
• A permanent working structure should be established individually foreach cross-border
area which functions as the main player and joint decision-making body of the
respective cooperation initiative;
• The permanent working structure should command a joint secretariat and joint staff
which/who should be financed through jointly mobilized financial resources.
27. 25
The development and implementation of fruitful cross-border cooperation in Asia is challenging and
it is therefore recommendableto first create favourable preconditions by implementing a set of
concrete actions and projects. Some suggestions in this context are presented in the box below.
Box 5: Suggestions Concerning Initial Cross-Border Cooperation Projects in Asia
• Improve infrastructure in border areas as a precondition for future cooperation, especially in
the economic field (accessibility): establish border regions as a gateway to neighbouring
countries and their national centres;
• Improve the processes of border controls (passport and customs) in order to substantially
reduce the waiting time at borders (“time is money”) – suitable instruments for achieving this
goal include the establishment of joint facilitiesand controls, as well as joint trainings
(including language) of police and customs officials; and
• Issue visas at the borders and not in the distant domestic hinterland – this should be made
possible by using modern electronic equipment and the necessary staff training.
28. 26
Glossary
The Association of European Border Regions (AEBR), which was established in Anholt, Germany, in
1971, is an organisation which is comprised of 100 members from approximately 180 border and cross-
border regions from all over Europe whose interests it represents at the European, national as well as
regional levels.
For more information, see also Chapter 2.3.
EUREGIO, founded in 1958, constitutes the first Euroregion. It is a rural cross-border region between the
Netherlands and Germany which is characterised by a polycentric settlement structure with a predominance
of small and medium-sized towns and municipalities. Cross-border networks are particularly prevalent in the
fields of mechanical and plant engineering, food processing, and medical technology.
For more information, see also: http://www.aebr.eu/en/members/member_detail.php?region_id=58
The EuRegio Salzburg – Berchtesgardener Land – Traunstein encompasses 59 cities and municipalities
in Austria, and 39 cities and municipalities as well as two independent community districts from the German
federal state of Bavaria. Sharing the Alps as their common habitat, these communities are connected
through a common history, language and culture, which have long been ensuring good cross-border
connections. Accordingly, the region’s authorities, institutions and associations cooperate in numerous
projects – with and without EU funding.
For more information, see also: http://www.aebr.eu/en/members/member_detail.php?region_id=81
The European Single Market is single market which seeks to guarantee the free movement of goods,
capital, services, and people – also known as the four freedoms – between the European Union’s 28
member states. It is intended to drive economic integration whereby the once separate economies of
Europe’s nation states become integrated within a single EU-wide. The EU internal market has further been
extended to the four members of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA), namely Iceland,
Liechtenstein, Norway, and Switzerland.
In European politics, the term Euroregion refers to a cross-border cooperative structure between two or
more neighbouring regions in different European countries. While varying widely in their particular forms,
they are typically designed to promote common interests across borders.
INTERREG, first launched in 1990 and officially known as European Territorial Cooperation (ETC), is a
financing instrument which is dedicated to facilitating regional development in Europe by enabling the
intensification of institutional cooperation across borders between both regions located at the EU’s internal
and external borders, and regions within transnational areas. The current programming period, Interreg V
(2014-2020), thus covers all 28 EU Member States, 6 accession countries, 3 EFTA countries, and 18
neighbouring countries, with total allocation accounting to EUR 10.1 billion which stem from the European
Regional Development Fund. Interreg is built around three strands of cooperation, namely cross-border
(Interreg A), transnational (Interreg B) and interregional (Interreg C) cooperation.
For more information, see also Chapter 2.4.
The Øresundskomiteen, or the Øresund Committee, covers the Øresund region at the Danish-Swedish and
is dedicated to fostering Danish-Swedish political cooperation. Moreover, having adopted a joint regional
development strategy, the so-called ØRUS, in May 2010, the Committee aims to bring together transnational
priorities and strategies through comprehensive network consultation in order to establish the most attractive
and climate friendly region in Europe by 2020. For this to be achieved, the following priority areas were
29. 27
identified: a cohesive labour market, culture and leisure, knowledge and innovation, and infrastructure and
mobility.
For more information, see also: http://www.aebr.eu/en/members/member_detail.php?region_id=1
A SWOT Analysis is a structured planning method for the evaluation of the Strengths, Weaknesses,
Opportunities of, and Threats to any given project. After having specified a project’s objective, a SWOT
analysis facilitates the identification of the internal and external factors which are both favourable and
unfavourable to achieving this objective.
A SWOT matrix consequently takes the following form:
Favourable Factors
-Factors which are helpful to
achieving a given objective -
Unfavourable Factors
- Factors which are harmful to
achieving a given objective -
Internal Factors
- Factors associated with the organisation
pursuing a given objective, including financial,
physical and human resources, as well as
experiences, among others -
Strengths Weaknesses
External Factors
- Factors associated with the environment in
which the organisation, pursuing a given
objective, operates, including political,
economic and environmental regulations,
market trends, and demographics, among
others -
Opportunities Challenges
Executing a SWOT analysis therefore not only helps planning the steps which are necessary for achieving
any given goal, but – perhaps even more importantly – helps deciding whether an objective is attainable in
the first place.
30. 28
About the Author
Jens Gabbe, born 21 August 1941, is an economist with a European-
wide experience in cross-border cooperation programmes and
projects, as well as in regional planning and development. In his
former function as a member of the German Kreditanstalt für
Wiederaufbau (1969-1972), he worked on development and funding
projects in developing countries.
From 1972 to 1998, Mr. Gabbe was the Managing Director of the
EUREGIO, the first cross-border cooperation mechanism at the
regional/local level in Europe. From 1987 until today, he has been working as the Secretary
General of the Association of European Border Regions (AEBR). In both functions, he obtained
practical experience in cross-border cooperation in various fields – including spatial planning,
infrastructure development, SMEs, labour market, emergency services, and media, among other –
at both the internal and external borders of the European Union.
His work has been focused on the establishment of cross-border organisations, the development of
cross-border programmes and projects, cross-border management, as well as on trainings in the
field of cross-border cooperation on the regional and local level. Additionally, Mr. Gabbe has been
engaged in financial engineering, and economic as well as infrastructure development.
Mr. Gabbe produced a number of key documents and background papers on existing and future
options for cross-border co-operation, including „The EU Initiative INTERREG and Future
Developments“, "Institutional Aspects of Cross-Border Cooperation", "The Future of Maritime
Borders", and "Cross-Border Financial Management", among others.
He presently functions as the Chairman of the Advisory Committee to the AEBR and is frequently
requested as an advisor for the EU Commission and Parliament, as well as for the EU Committee
of the Regions.
31. 29
GIZ Programme “Support for Economic Cooperation in Sub-Regional
Initiatives in Asia (SCSI)”
Background
Initiatives in support of regional cooperation and integration have increasingly come to be
understood as key to Asia’s future development. They enhance the region’s division of labour, its
capabilities to attract investments, as well as its access to global markets. Moreover, sub-regional
initiatives improve the connectivity between interior lands and peripheral areas, whereby they not
only contribute to the reduction of regional disparities, but also facilitate the development of
regional competitive advantages.
Our Approach
The SCSI Programme aims to support both
public stakeholders at the national, (sub-
)regional and local level, and private
stakeholders in the context of sub-regional
cooperation initiatives. In doing so, the
programme intends to enhance the structural
conditions of regional economic cooperation, improve the implementation capabilities of the
relevant stakeholders, and foster the inclusion of the private sector in the relevant processes.
In particular, the SCSI Programme aims to support the intensification of cross-border economic
relations between the PR China and its neighbouring countries– that is Cambodia, the Lao PDR
and Viet Nam in the framework of the Pan-Beibu Gulf (PBG) Economic Cooperation, and Mongolia
in the framework of the Greater Tumen Initiative (GTI) – in order to ensure these countries’ equal
inclusion into the respective integration processes and thereby facilitate their future development.
Focus Areas
• Addressing functional aspects of regional cooperation and integration in the region through
human capacity development.
• Contributing to the implementation of concrete projects in the fields of trade facilitation,
maritime economy, and local cross-border cooperation.
For more Information please refer to: http://www.giz.de/en/worldwide/34101.html
Fact Box SCSI
Project Name
Support for Economic Cooperation in Sub-
Regional Initiatives in Asia
Commissioned
by
German Federal Ministry for Economic
Cooperation and Development (BMZ)
Key Subjects
Trade Facilitation, Port Cooperation, Cross-
Border Economic Zones, Public Private
Partnerships
Duration 2015 – 2019
32. Registered offices
Bonn and Eschborn, Germany
T +49 228 44 60-0 (Bonn)
T +49 61 96 79-0 (Eschborn)
Dag-Hammarskjöld-Weg 1-5
65760 Eschborn, Germany
T +49 61 96 79-0
F +49 61 96 79-11 15
E info@giz.de
I www.giz.de
Support for Economic Cooperation in
Sub-Regional Initiatives in Asia
TaYuan Diplomatic Office
14 Liangmahe South Street, Chaoyang District
100600 Beijing, PR China
E rci-asia@giz.de