This document outlines an ethics in psychology course with multiple assignments. It includes:
1) A 3-part assignment with different due dates for discussion questions and individual/group assignments on topics like culturally neutral assessment tools, termination of therapy, and handling disparate information when evaluating trainees.
2) Sample discussion questions and an ethical dilemma scenario involving a graduate student.
3) Instructions for individual and group assignments requiring original work, citations, and references on selecting culture-neutral assessments or presenting examples of when culture-biased assessments caused problems.
Ethics in Psychology CourseDirections This is three-part assi.docx
1. Ethics in Psychology Course
Directions: This is three-part assignment, with different due
dates. Please pay attention to each individual instruction and
due date.
Part I Discussion Questions Due Date: Responses to questions
#1, #2, #3 are due on 6/15/19 and #4, #5, #5, #7, #8 are due on
6/17/19.
Directions: Respond to the questions in 100 words. You must
cite your references and must provide original work. Please
remember this is a psychology ethics class, therefore; the
responses must reflect the class.
1. Why is the selection of culturally neutral assessment tools so
critical to the ethical practice of psychology?
2. What potential harm can result if assessment materials are
culture-bound?
3. What potential limitations do you foresee encountering with
culturally neutral assessment tools?
4. According to the APA Ethics Code, what conditions would
justify termination of therapy?
5. Do you agree with the prohibitions of termination of therapy?
Why or why not?
6. List another reason why you agree or disagree with the
prohibitions?
7. Provide citation and reference to the material(s) you discuss.
Describe what you found interesting regarding this topic, and
why.
8. Describe what may be unclear to you, and what you would
like to learn.
Part II Individual Assignment ** Due Date: This part of the
assignment is due 6/17/2019**
Directions: Please complete the attached worksheet. You must
2. use cite references used in-text. Must be original work and cite
all work! The scenario is found below!
***Scenario:Case 7. Handling Disparate Information for
Evaluating Trainees
Rashid Vaji, PhD, a member of the school psychology faculty at
a midsize university, serves as a faculty supervisor for students
assigned to externships in schools. The department has
formalized a supervision and evaluation system for the extern
program. Students have weekly individual meetings with the
faculty supervisor and biweekly meetings with the on-site
supervisor. The on-site supervisor writes a midyear (December)
and end of academic year (May) evaluation of each student. The
site evaluations are sent to Dr. Vaji, and he provides
feedback based on the site and his own supervisory evaluation
to each student. The final grade (fail, low pass, pass, high pass)
is the responsibility of Dr. Vaji.
Dr. Vaji also teaches the spring semester graduate class Health
Disparities in Mental Health. One of the course requirements is
for students to write weekly thought papers, in which they take
the perspective of therapy clients from different ethnic groups
in reaction to specific session topics. Leo Watson, a second-
year graduate student, is one of Dr. Vaji’s externship
supervisees. He is also enrolled in the Health Disparities
course. Leo’s thought papers often present ethnic-minority
adolescents as prone to violence and unable to grasp the
insights offered by school psychologists. In a classroom role-
playing exercise, Leo plays an ethnic-minority student client as
slumping in his chair, not understanding the psychologist, and
giving angry retorts. In written comments on these thought
papers and class feedback, Dr. Vaji encourages Leo to
incorporate more of the readings on racial/ethnic discrimination
and multicultural competence into his papers and to provide
more complex perspectives on clients.
One day during his office hours, three students from the class
come to Dr. Vaji’s office to complain about Leo’s behavior
outside the classroom. They describe incidents in which Leo
3. uses derogatory ethnic labels to describe his externship clients
and brags about “putting one over” on his site supervisors by
describing these clients in “glowing” terms just to satisfy his
supervisors’ “stupid do-good” attitudes. They also report an
incident at a local bar at which Leo was seen harassing an
African American waitress, including by using racial slurs.
After the students have left his office, Dr. Vaji reviews his
midyear evaluation and supervision notes on Leo and the
midyear on-site supervisor’s report. In his own evaluation
report, Dr. Vaji had written, “Leo often articulates a strong
sense of duty to help his ethnic minority students overcome past
discrimination but needs additional growth and supervision in
applying a multicultural perspective to his clinical work.” The
on-site supervisor’s evaluation states that
Leo has a wonderful attitude toward his student clients. . . .
Unfortunately, evaluation of his multicultural treatment skills is
limited because Leo has had fewer cases to discuss than some of
his peers, since a larger than usual number of ethnic minority
clients have stopped coming to their sessions with him.
It is the middle of the spring semester, and Dr. Vaji still has
approximately 6 weeks of supervision left with Leo. The
students’ complaints about Leo are consistent with what Dr.
Vaji has observed in Leo’s class papers and role-playing
exercises. However, these complaints are very different from
Leo’s presentation during on-site supervision. If Leo has been
intentionally deceiving both supervisors, then he may be more
ineffective or harmful as a therapist to his current clients than
either supervisor has realized. In addition, purposeful attempts
to deceive the supervisors might indicate a personality disorder
or lack of integrity that, if left unaddressed, might be harmful to
adolescent clients in the future.
Ethical Dilemma
Dr. Vaji would like to meet with Leo to discuss, at a minimum,
ways to retain adolescent clients and to improve his
multicultural treatment skills. He does not know to what extent
27. 2. To what extent, if any, should Dr. Vaji consider Leo’s
ethnicity in his deliberations? Would the dilemma be addressed
differently if Leo self-identified as non-Hispanic White,
Hispanic, on non-Hispanic Black?
3. How are APA Ethical Standards 1.08, 3.04, 3.05, 3.09, 7.04,
7.05, and 17.05 relevant to this case? Which other standards
might apply?
4. What are Dr. Vaji’s ethical alternatives for resolving this
dilemma? Which alternative best reflects the Ethics Code
aspirational principle and enforceable standard, as well as legal
standards and obligations to stakeholders?
5. What steps should Dr. Vaji take to ethically implement his
decision and monitor its effects?
29. Respond to the following questions in
1,250 to
1,500 words.
1.
Why is this an ethical dilemma? Which APA Ethical Principles
help frame the nature of the
dilemma?
2.
To what extent, if any, shou
ld Dr. Vaji consider Leo’s ethnicity in his deliberations? Would
the
dilemma be addressed differently if Leo self
-
identified as non
-
Hispanic
W
hite, Hispanic, on non
-
Hispanic
B
lack?
30. 3.
How are APA Ethical Standards 1.08, 3.04, 3.05, 3.09, 7.04,
7.05, and
1
7.05 relevant to this
case?
Which other standards might apply?
4.
What are Dr. Vaji’s ethical alternative
s
for resolving this dilemma? Which alternative best reflects
the Ethics Code aspirational principle and enforceable standard,
as well as
legal stan
dards and
obligations to stakeholders?
o
o
32. Case Study Seven Worksheet
Respond to the following questions in 1,250 to 1,500 words.
1. Why is this an ethical dilemma? Which APA Ethical
Principles help frame the nature of the
dilemma?
2. To what extent, if any, should Dr. Vaji consider Leo’s
ethnicity in his deliberations? Would the
dilemma be addressed differently if Leo self-identified as non-
Hispanic White, Hispanic, on non-
Hispanic Black?
3. How are APA Ethical Standards 1.08, 3.04, 3.05, 3.09, 7.04,
7.05, and 17.05 relevant to this
case? Which other standards might apply?
4. What are Dr. Vaji’s ethical alternatives for resolving this
dilemma? Which alternative best reflects
the Ethics Code aspirational principle and enforceable standard,
as well as legal standards and
obligations to stakeholders?
33. o
o
o
5. What steps should Dr. Vaji take to ethically implement his
decision and monitor its effects?
Reference
Fisher, C. B. (2013). Decoding the ethics code: A practical
guide for psychologists. Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
Culture Neutral Assessment Presentation
PSYCH/660
June 17, 2019
Context
2
What are Cultural Neutral Assessments Used for?
Selection process of cultural neutral assessments.
34. How ethical are cultural neutral assessments?
Cultural biased assessments.
Examples of when culture biased assessments have been
problematic.
Conclusion
Introduction
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_SoVarmhid-
Y/TF1jjPiDHqI/AAAAAAAABZQ/FUe2PDg9p7g/s1600/encuest
a.png
In this presentation we will discuss what are cultural neutral
assessments, and how are they used. This presentation will also
advise on how the selection process of cultural neutral
assessments works. This presentation will cover hos how ethical
cultural neutral assessment maybe. This presentation will advise
on cultural biased assessments. Finally, this presentation will
provide examples of when culture biased assessment have been
a problem.
3
35. What are Cultural Neutral Assessments Used for?
Medical Needs
Employment
Personality
Intelligence & Skills
Education
The purpose of a cultural neutral assessment is to assess
intelligence or other attributes of an individual without relying
on knowledge specific to any individual cultural group
(Psychology, 2019). The information obtained from an
assessment will help medical staff and the patient develop an
acceptable plan of treatment.
Cultural neutral assessments can be used to determine medical
needs, employment screening, personality type/traits,
intelligence and skills, and education. An assessment can be
used for employers to determine whether or not a candidate is a
good fit for their company, and match their hiring criteria
(Doyle, 2019). An educational assessment can be included with
the intelligence and skills because an educational assessment
helps determine where a child is in regard to their knowledge
level and skills. It also helps determine whether or not the child
is on track in their development, and if they are in the
appropriate grade level. The use of personality assessments
helps to determine aspects of a person’s personality; as well as
their behavioral style. They are also a measurement of
personality characteristics; such as whether a person is more
introverted or extroverted.
https://www.canstockphoto.com/assessment-28697977.html
https://psychology.jrank.org/pages/161/Culture-Fair-Test.html
https://www.thebalancecareers.com/what-are-talent-
36. assessments-and-how-do-companies-use-them-2059814
4
Selection process of Cultural Neutral Assessments
Cultural Neutral Assessments Ethical?
The Guidelines need to be the same to be considered ethical:
All participants have agreed to partake in the assessment.
It is used for specific aspects.
In order to be ethical the assessments must correspond with
these aspects:
Item Response Theory
Relate to a Person’s Parameters
Itemize Parameters
Differential Item Functioning
They must go beyond factors that only focus on culture.
The use of multiple variable matching methods.
Cultural Neutral Assessments can be ethical but they need to
follow the same ethics guidelines. The study can’ t cause any
one any harm and the participants must understand the use of
their data. The data and participants shouldn’t be used for
specific aspects where cultural differences play a significant
role.
The assessments that are utilized, Item Response and
Differential Item Functioning, need to follow certain aspects.
For item response, the assessments need to relate to person
37. parameters and item parameters (Bushnell, 2000). This will
ensure that the cultural aspects remain neutral. In addition, the
differential item functioning needs to make sure that during
assessments to go beyond and remove culture from the answers.
This can be done by using the multiple-variable matching
method (Wu & Erickson, 2006).
6
Cultural Biased Assessments
Examples of when culture biased assessments have been
problematic
Conclusion
References
Wu, A. D. 1. [email protected] co., & Ercikan, K. (2006). Using
Multiple-Variable Matching to Identify Cultural Sources of
Differential Item Functioning. International Journal of
Testing, 6(3), 287–300.
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327574ijt0603_5
Donald M. Bushnell, & Marianne Amir. (2000). Evaluation of
the Whoqol-Bref in Six Countries: A Cross-Cultural Evaluation
Using Rasch Item Response Theory (IRT) Analysis. Quality of
Life Research, 9(3), 269. Retrieved from
http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=
shib&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.4036191&site=eds-live&scope=site