KAFKAS ÜNİVERSİTESİ/KAFKAS UNIVERSITY
SOCIOLOGY
Course
LECTURE NOTES AND POWER POINT PRESENTATIONS
Prof.Dr. Halit Hami ÖZ
Kars, TURKEY
hamioz@yahoo.com
Powerpoint with guiding questions about assimilation (melting pot) and integration (salad bowl) as it pertains to the socializing of American immigrants.
DEBATE 22 EDUCATION POLICYASSIGNING STUDENTS TO SCHOOLS BA.docxedwardmarivel
DEBATE
22
EDUCATION POLICY
ASSIGNING STUDENTS TO SCHOOLS BASED ON RACE:
Justified or Unacceptable? ADVOCATE: National Education Association, et al.
JUSTIFIED
SOURCE: Amicus curiae brief to the U.S. Supreme Court in Parents
Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 (2007) UNACCEPTABLE
ADVOCATE: Asian American Legal Foundation
SOURCE: Amicus curiae brief to the U.S. Supreme Court in Parents
Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 (2007)
The intersection between education and race has long sparked emotional debate. Prior to the Civil War it was uncommon and in some places illegal to educate children who were not white. The Fourteenth Amendment (1868) requiring equal protection of the law for all citizens made it illegal to overtly deny children of color an education or to give them an expressly inferior one. However, the changes were more cosmetic that substantive. In many places, Jim Crow laws legalized accommo- dations that were supposedly “separate but equal,” but in reality were highly unequal. Blacks were the most numerous victims, but Asian Americans, Hispanics, and others also were relegated to second-class facilities and services. The Supreme Court upheld this fictitious equality in Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), a case that involved railroad car accommodations but also applied to schools and many other points of segregation. That decision stood until the Supreme Court overturned it in Brown v. Board of Education (1954). Writing for the unanimous court, Chief Justice Earl Warren opined that in “public education the doctrine of ‘separate but equal’ has no place. Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal.”
Over the years, the application Brown v. Board of Education slowly eliminated the overtly intentional school segregation, but, like the Fourteenth Amendment, there was a large gap between theoretical importance and practical impact. Two factors lim- ited Brown. One was that some school districts build schools or drew district lines in ways that maintained or created schools that were de facto racially segregated. The second factor involved living patterns. Whites fled cities to the suburbs or sent their children to private schools to avoid racially integrated schools, and urban schools became more and more minority dominated. These population shifts also left cities with diminished tax bases, and the schools declined for want of adequate funding.
In response, the courts moved to a more proactive stance. In a case involving the region centered on Charlotte, North Carolina, where schools remained very segre- gated and the school board resisted moving to desegregate, a federal judge in 1965 found that the segregation was intentional, ordered that all 105 schools integrate, and specified that children be bussed between schools in necessary. The Supreme Court in Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education (1971) unanimously backed
2
John T. Rourke, You Decide! 2012 Copy.
Osailan 1
Hussam Osailan
Ryan Scariano
English 201
February 25, 2016
Free Education as a Popular Issue
The idea of free education is quickly becoming a controversial and much debated political topic throughout the world. Social media and the internet have provided people with a platform in which to express their opinions about whether or not education should be free for all without compromising quality. This picture, which is from a website for the British Green Party, shows one side of the free education debate. This topic originally interested me because I come from a country where education is free and where everyone has the opportunity to go to college or university regardless of economic status. In fact, I am in the United States right now because the government of Saudi Arabia has a multi-million dollar scholarship program that gives Saudi students the opportunity to study in the U.S. and other countries free of cost. After being in the U.S. for 3 years I now realize how lucky I am to have free education.
Supporters of free education argue that education has become more of a business enterprise rather than a basic human right. In addition, the cost of learning and education is placing an unnecessary economic burden on students who end up owing the government large amounts of money. In addition, the right to education is quickly turning into a privilege for those who can actually afford it. For example, I recently learned that my friend had to take out over $100,000 to help pay for her master’s degree at Georgetown University. I asked her to tell me more. She said that she was able to pay for her bachelor’s degree through government grants based on her income and age. She also attended community college where she paid for tuition on her own by working full time. Her experience gives a prime example of how complicated the current U.S. education system is and also what works and what doesn’t work. She is in extreme debt and will likely be in debt or a large portion of her life because of the loans she was forced to take out for only 2 years of schooling. While Georgetown is considered one of the top universities in the world and quality of education was definitely not compromised with her decision to attend there, she has expressed concern about whether or not the debt she has was worth it.
Supporters also say that education is a political choice, not a necessity. In fact, there are several countries with a free education system that seems to be working. Several of these countries are located in Europe, where the quality of education is not questioned. From what I’ve read, governments are able to subsidize the cost of tuition fees at universities and colleges through higher income tax. Many who are against free education argue that if the U.S. were to adopt a free education system that the income tax rates would skyrocket. In considering the policies of Saudi Arabia one more time I feel that we, again, are quite lucky. Free education d.
KAFKAS ÜNİVERSİTESİ/KAFKAS UNIVERSITY
SOCIOLOGY
Course
LECTURE NOTES AND POWER POINT PRESENTATIONS
Prof.Dr. Halit Hami ÖZ
Kars, TURKEY
hamioz@yahoo.com
Powerpoint with guiding questions about assimilation (melting pot) and integration (salad bowl) as it pertains to the socializing of American immigrants.
DEBATE 22 EDUCATION POLICYASSIGNING STUDENTS TO SCHOOLS BA.docxedwardmarivel
DEBATE
22
EDUCATION POLICY
ASSIGNING STUDENTS TO SCHOOLS BASED ON RACE:
Justified or Unacceptable? ADVOCATE: National Education Association, et al.
JUSTIFIED
SOURCE: Amicus curiae brief to the U.S. Supreme Court in Parents
Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 (2007) UNACCEPTABLE
ADVOCATE: Asian American Legal Foundation
SOURCE: Amicus curiae brief to the U.S. Supreme Court in Parents
Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 (2007)
The intersection between education and race has long sparked emotional debate. Prior to the Civil War it was uncommon and in some places illegal to educate children who were not white. The Fourteenth Amendment (1868) requiring equal protection of the law for all citizens made it illegal to overtly deny children of color an education or to give them an expressly inferior one. However, the changes were more cosmetic that substantive. In many places, Jim Crow laws legalized accommo- dations that were supposedly “separate but equal,” but in reality were highly unequal. Blacks were the most numerous victims, but Asian Americans, Hispanics, and others also were relegated to second-class facilities and services. The Supreme Court upheld this fictitious equality in Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), a case that involved railroad car accommodations but also applied to schools and many other points of segregation. That decision stood until the Supreme Court overturned it in Brown v. Board of Education (1954). Writing for the unanimous court, Chief Justice Earl Warren opined that in “public education the doctrine of ‘separate but equal’ has no place. Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal.”
Over the years, the application Brown v. Board of Education slowly eliminated the overtly intentional school segregation, but, like the Fourteenth Amendment, there was a large gap between theoretical importance and practical impact. Two factors lim- ited Brown. One was that some school districts build schools or drew district lines in ways that maintained or created schools that were de facto racially segregated. The second factor involved living patterns. Whites fled cities to the suburbs or sent their children to private schools to avoid racially integrated schools, and urban schools became more and more minority dominated. These population shifts also left cities with diminished tax bases, and the schools declined for want of adequate funding.
In response, the courts moved to a more proactive stance. In a case involving the region centered on Charlotte, North Carolina, where schools remained very segre- gated and the school board resisted moving to desegregate, a federal judge in 1965 found that the segregation was intentional, ordered that all 105 schools integrate, and specified that children be bussed between schools in necessary. The Supreme Court in Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education (1971) unanimously backed
2
John T. Rourke, You Decide! 2012 Copy.
Osailan 1
Hussam Osailan
Ryan Scariano
English 201
February 25, 2016
Free Education as a Popular Issue
The idea of free education is quickly becoming a controversial and much debated political topic throughout the world. Social media and the internet have provided people with a platform in which to express their opinions about whether or not education should be free for all without compromising quality. This picture, which is from a website for the British Green Party, shows one side of the free education debate. This topic originally interested me because I come from a country where education is free and where everyone has the opportunity to go to college or university regardless of economic status. In fact, I am in the United States right now because the government of Saudi Arabia has a multi-million dollar scholarship program that gives Saudi students the opportunity to study in the U.S. and other countries free of cost. After being in the U.S. for 3 years I now realize how lucky I am to have free education.
Supporters of free education argue that education has become more of a business enterprise rather than a basic human right. In addition, the cost of learning and education is placing an unnecessary economic burden on students who end up owing the government large amounts of money. In addition, the right to education is quickly turning into a privilege for those who can actually afford it. For example, I recently learned that my friend had to take out over $100,000 to help pay for her master’s degree at Georgetown University. I asked her to tell me more. She said that she was able to pay for her bachelor’s degree through government grants based on her income and age. She also attended community college where she paid for tuition on her own by working full time. Her experience gives a prime example of how complicated the current U.S. education system is and also what works and what doesn’t work. She is in extreme debt and will likely be in debt or a large portion of her life because of the loans she was forced to take out for only 2 years of schooling. While Georgetown is considered one of the top universities in the world and quality of education was definitely not compromised with her decision to attend there, she has expressed concern about whether or not the debt she has was worth it.
Supporters also say that education is a political choice, not a necessity. In fact, there are several countries with a free education system that seems to be working. Several of these countries are located in Europe, where the quality of education is not questioned. From what I’ve read, governments are able to subsidize the cost of tuition fees at universities and colleges through higher income tax. Many who are against free education argue that if the U.S. were to adopt a free education system that the income tax rates would skyrocket. In considering the policies of Saudi Arabia one more time I feel that we, again, are quite lucky. Free education d.
STUDENTS NAME :
REGISTRATION NUMBER:
SCHOOL :
FACULTY :
COURSE TITLE :
DATE :
HOW MINORITY RECRUITMENT AND ENROLLMENT IS EFFECTIVE ON PREDOMINANTLY WHITE INSTITUTIONS.
INTRODUCTION.
A predominantly white institution refers to an institution of higher learning that mainly comprises of white students and few other races such as African-Americans, Asians and Hispanic. The racial diversity in higher learning institutions across the United States of America is inconsistent since many colleges and campuses tend to be white. Minority and racial recruitment have become significant in general recruitment efforts at many predominantly white institutions. Despite the increased efforts a majority of learning institutions are still unsuccessful in increasing diversity on campus. In predominantly white institutions, it is difficult for foreign students to blend with the white. Most of them are despised, not only by their fellow students but also their teachers. They are never given attention and they are deemed stupid for any concerns they raise in class. This can lead to lower class participation, grades and in some cases even drop outs. This is why it is important for minority students in predominantly white institutions to have a strong support network. We therefore look at look at how minority recruitment and enrollment is now effective on predominantly white institutions.
Some predominantly white institutions have student groups that are dedicated in supporting the foreign students to adjustments. This includes organizations such as Asian Student Association, Black Cultural Society and South Asian Multicultural Organized Students Association. These organizations welcome and support students from other races and also create a network for students to people who remind them of their families. This is essential for a group of students who feel isolated and lack a sense of belonging.
The legal aspect of diversity in higher education system ensures increase in minority groups. The current efforts being made by institutes of higher education to increase diversity on campuses stems from early American segregation. The Supreme Court set legal standards for social conditions. Among them was the separate-but-equal legal standard, also called Plessy v. Ferguson, which was a legal justification for European Americans who attempted to keep the minority illiterate and submissive.
In order to further increased minority enrollment in American colleges and universities, the Supreme Court heard the case of Regents of the University of California v.Bakke in 1978. Bakke who is a student, was denied admission twice to a California medical school despite having better grades and test scores than successful minority applicants. Bakke was among the first to present grievances about affirmative action to court. Bakke clai.
EDUCATION RIGHTS 8
Is Education a Right or a Privilege?NameCourse NumberModule NumberDate
Abstract
The debate over education continues with each passing year. Socio-economic changes, particularly in the United States, have made education essential to obtaining gainful employment. Better primary education, better teachers and smaller classroom sizes can help students succeed in the primary grades. As higher education becomes more important, this can open even more doors to technology, medicine and other high paying fields. Many would consider access to the best education to be a right which we should all be privy to. Looking at this issue from a global perspective reveals that quality education should be considered a privilege which should be valued and treasured.
Running head: EDUCATION RIGHTS 2
Is Education a Right or a Privilege?
In nearly every election and important political debate, education continues to be an common and controversial topic. Much of the discussion is around the “right” to quality education, and how social, economic and racial factors seem to favor one group or another with regard to quality education. In the landmark Supreme Court decision of Brown v. the Board of Education in 1954, education was proclaimed to be a “right which must be made available to all on equal terms” (Carson, 2004). Over sixty years later, it is clear that this goal still has not been reached, either nationally or internationally. As wealth equality has changed during that time period, similar trends are seen in education. As the economy shifts from manufacturing to technology in the United States, education becomes that much more important in securing high wage employment. The same is true in other counties. In fact, if a global and historic view of education is taken, I believe that it is clear that education is really a very important privilege, rather than a right.
When the Affordable Care Act, aka Obamacare, was passed in 2010, many dismissed it as just another unnecessary social program that put more burden on the taxpayers in order to make sure that the poor and other less privileged parts of society had access to affordable health care. This was despite the fact that the United States was the only first world country that did not already guarantee healthcare for its citizens. Many of the people who opposed Obamacare as a “social program” have taken advantage of the free public education in the United States for themselves. Since it was a part of life that was taken for granted, free education was considered as much of a right as clean water or access to police and fire services. By looking at things more internationally, it is clear that the American perspective is probably altered by history, convention and perception.
Wealth inequality was a constant topic of debate in the 2016 U.S. Presidential election. Bernie Sanders presented numerous statistics about the wealth o ...
76 Kappan December 2015January 2016is required in .docxblondellchancy
76 Kappan December 2015/January 2016
is required in the perfor-
mance of our most basic
public responsibilities, even
service in the armed forces.
It is the very foundation of
good citizenship. Today it
is a principal instrument in
awakening the child to cul-
tural values, in preparing
him for later professional
training, and in helping him
to adjust normally to his en-
vironment. In these days, it is
doubtful that any child may
reasonably be expected to
succeed in life if he is de-
nied the opportunity of an
education.
But in 1973, in San Antonio
Independent School District v.
Rodriguez, the Supreme Court
held that access to public
education was not a consti-
tutional right under the U.S.
Constitution.
In another case, Chinese-
American students with
limited English language
profi ciency claimed the San
Francisco school district’s
failure to provide language
accommodation and support
for them violated the U.S.
Constitution and Title VI of
the Civil Rights Act. Find-
ing in favor of the students,
in Lau v. Nichols (1974), the
Supreme Court focused not
on the constitutional question
but on the Civil Rights Act.
Congress codifi ed much of
the decision shortly thereafter
by passing the Equal Educa-
tion Opportunities Act.
Denying children an
education because
of the actions of their
parents is not legal.
The right to a public educa-
tion for those who are not
U.S. citizens, legal residents,
or living with their parents is
not a clear and stable issue.
Children who enter the U.S.
illegally with or without their
parents are at the heart of this
question.
Let’s begin with the 1954
U.S. Supreme Court decision
in Brown v. Board of Education,
where the court declared state
laws denying access to public
schools based on race to be
unconstitutional under the
Equal Protection clause:
Today education is per-
haps the most important
function of state and local
governments. Compulsory
school attendance laws and
the great expenditures for
education both demon-
strate our recognition of the
importance of education to
our democratic society. It
cratic system of government
and . . . the primary vehicle
for transmitting the values on
which our society rests. . . . In
sum, education has a funda-
mental role in maintaining
the fabric of our society.”
The Court noted that, if
the state intends to deny such
a benefi t, it should have a
suffi ciently valid reason. The
Court found that denying
children an education, not
due to their own actions, but
the actions of their parents,
was not suffi ciently compel-
ling to deny children this
important public benefi t.
In Martinez v. Bynum, 461
U.S. 321 (1983), the U.S.
Supreme Court ruled (8 -1)
on another Texas statute
intended to close the school-
house doors to nonresident
children. The student was
a U.S. citizen by birth. But,
when he was a young child,
he and his parents moved to
Mexico, where his parents
were citiz ...
Running head LITERATURE REVIEW1MINORITY BOYS SCHOOL DROPOUT A.docxwlynn1
Running head: LITERATURE REVIEW 1
MINORITY BOYS SCHOOL DROPOUT AND CONTINUATION SCHOOL 2
Literature Review
Literature Review
It is expected that every student enrolled in high school works hard towards the completion of their high school diploma. However, research indicates there was a 5.4% drop out among the minority groups, in which 6.4% of the overall status dropout rate is that of the male youth. Among the Africans, Hispanics, and American Indian Natives, the dropout rates among the boys are 8%, 10%, and 11.6%, respectively (Musu-Gillette, De Brey, McFarland, Hussar, Sonnenberg, & Wilkinson-Flicker, 2017). These dropouts often join continuation schools later in life with the hope that they will get an equivalent of their high school diploma. The theoretical framework of this research is based on the phenomenological approach, in which the aim is to examine the occurrence of school dropout among minority boys and their performance after joining continuation school.
One of the theories that explain why minority boys drop out of school is the Critical Race Theory. The model argues that education opportunities are often affected by an individual’s race and racism (Colbert, 2017). Based on this theory, minority groups are often faced with issues such as poverty and racial discrimination in schools, which causes some of the male students to drop out of school. Racism victims in school feel inferior to the whites and sometimes feel like they do not deserve a quality education, and they end up falling behind in school.
Cultural production theory, on the other hand, explains why the dropouts choose to go back to school. The theory holds that the education system helps to level out the playing field so that people get equal opportunities to make their lives. The approach provides an essential perspective as to why minority boys dropouts join continuation schools and complete their learning process.
According to Bania, Lydersen, and Kvernmo (2016), non-completion of high school mostly results from different problems, most of which are health-related. In research in which the authors carried out among the youths in the Arctic, they found out that dropout rates were higher among males. Additionally, minority males often drop out due to mental issues. Based on the article, education affects an individual’s employment opportunities and income, as well as the quality of life, which explains why the dropouts choose to join continuation schools later in life.
Hernandez and Ortez (2019) undertake research in which they analyze the experiences of some Latinas who are enrolled in continuation school. Based on the writers’ claims, continuation schools have put in place strategies that enable the students to cope and realize that they have an opportunity to succeed just like any other individual. Additionally, due to the improvement in the prospects for quality education presented to the marginalized groups, the article indicates that there are .
Similar to Essential Tips on School Desegregation for Law Students (15)
Gain knowledge about real life application of mathematics. You will also become a master to solve mathematics assignment problems from Dream Assignment experts.
ASHWINI KUMAR UPADHYAY v/s Union of India.pptxshweeta209
transfer of the P.I.L filed by lawyer Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay in Delhi High Court to Supreme Court.
on the issue of UNIFORM MARRIAGE AGE of men and women.
A "File Trademark" is a legal term referring to the registration of a unique symbol, logo, or name used to identify and distinguish products or services. This process provides legal protection, granting exclusive rights to the trademark owner, and helps prevent unauthorized use by competitors.
Visit Now: https://www.tumblr.com/trademark-quick/751620857551634432/ensure-legal-protection-file-your-trademark-with?source=share
In 2020, the Ministry of Home Affairs established a committee led by Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh, former Vice Chancellor of National Law University (NLU), Delhi. This committee was tasked with reviewing the three codes of criminal law. The primary objective of the committee was to propose comprehensive reforms to the country’s criminal laws in a manner that is both principled and effective.
The committee’s focus was on ensuring the safety and security of individuals, communities, and the nation as a whole. Throughout its deliberations, the committee aimed to uphold constitutional values such as justice, dignity, and the intrinsic value of each individual. Their goal was to recommend amendments to the criminal laws that align with these values and priorities.
Subsequently, in February, the committee successfully submitted its recommendations regarding amendments to the criminal law. These recommendations are intended to serve as a foundation for enhancing the current legal framework, promoting safety and security, and upholding the constitutional principles of justice, dignity, and the inherent worth of every individual.
How to Obtain Permanent Residency in the NetherlandsBridgeWest.eu
You can rely on our assistance if you are ready to apply for permanent residency. Find out more at: https://immigration-netherlands.com/obtain-a-permanent-residence-permit-in-the-netherlands/.
RIGHTS OF VICTIM EDITED PRESENTATION(SAIF JAVED).pptxOmGod1
Victims of crime have a range of rights designed to ensure their protection, support, and participation in the justice system. These rights include the right to be treated with dignity and respect, the right to be informed about the progress of their case, and the right to be heard during legal proceedings. Victims are entitled to protection from intimidation and harm, access to support services such as counseling and medical care, and the right to restitution from the offender. Additionally, many jurisdictions provide victims with the right to participate in parole hearings and the right to privacy to protect their personal information from public disclosure. These rights aim to acknowledge the impact of crime on victims and to provide them with the necessary resources and involvement in the judicial process.
Military Commissions details LtCol Thomas Jasper as Detailed Defense CounselThomas (Tom) Jasper
Military Commissions Trial Judiciary, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Notice of the Chief Defense Counsel's detailing of LtCol Thomas F. Jasper, Jr. USMC, as Detailed Defense Counsel for Abd Al Hadi Al-Iraqi on 6 August 2014 in the case of United States v. Hadi al Iraqi (10026)
ALL EYES ON RAFAH BUT WHY Explain more.pdf46adnanshahzad
All eyes on Rafah: But why?. The Rafah border crossing, a crucial point between Egypt and the Gaza Strip, often finds itself at the center of global attention. As we explore the significance of Rafah, we’ll uncover why all eyes are on Rafah and the complexities surrounding this pivotal region.
INTRODUCTION
What makes Rafah so significant that it captures global attention? The phrase ‘All eyes are on Rafah’ resonates not just with those in the region but with people worldwide who recognize its strategic, humanitarian, and political importance. In this guide, we will delve into the factors that make Rafah a focal point for international interest, examining its historical context, humanitarian challenges, and political dimensions.
Car Accident Injury Do I Have a Case....Knowyourright
Every year, thousands of Minnesotans are injured in car accidents. These injuries can be severe – even life-changing. Under Minnesota law, you can pursue compensation through a personal injury lawsuit.
PRECEDENT AS A SOURCE OF LAW (SAIF JAVED).pptxOmGod1
Precedent, or stare decisis, is a cornerstone of common law systems where past judicial decisions guide future cases, ensuring consistency and predictability in the legal system. Binding precedents from higher courts must be followed by lower courts, while persuasive precedents may influence but are not obligatory. This principle promotes fairness and efficiency, allowing for the evolution of the law as higher courts can overrule outdated decisions. Despite criticisms of rigidity and complexity, precedent ensures similar cases are treated alike, balancing stability with flexibility in judicial decision-making.
NATURE, ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL LAW.pptxanvithaav
These slides helps the student of international law to understand what is the nature of international law? and how international law was originated and developed?.
The slides was well structured along with the highlighted points for better understanding .
2. Desegregation of Public School in
USA
There is a huge effort in desegregating the public
schools in United States of America. It had been the
primary target on Civil Rights Movement. From 1930s,
the lawyers had come from National Association for
the Advancement of Colored People. There is a
strategy to present the local lawsuits at the court. The
argument is not equal and every child other than race
and this is the right education.
3. Segregation of Schools in Supreme
Court
The lawsuits have been added
into landmark case named
Brown v. Board of
Education where the case of
Supreme Court have
outlawed segregation in the
schools around 1954. Most of
the segregated schools have
not been combined. There are
interviewees in Civil Rights
History Project sharing a
tough fight which frightened
teachers, students, and
parents.
4. Difficulty in Desegregation
Desegregation could not be a battle in each
community in South. Lawrence Guyot turned out as
leader in Student Nonviolent Coordinating
Committee. They were raised in Pass Christian, the
city located in Mississippi Gulf Coast and affected by
tough labor unions in industry of shipyard along with
Catholic Church.
5. Racial Problem in School
Brown and Brown II motivate
d significant agreement
of hope races will
be joined in
those public schools and the
United States is planning to
move before for solving
racial animosities. Thurgood
Marshall had been leader
of National Association for t
he Advancement of Colored P
eople's Legal Defense Fund fo
r challenge in the
school segregation related
to Brown.
6. Busing for School
Busing represents the plan for the promotion of
school desegregation where the
minority students have been transported for
the white schools along with white students who have
been presented to minority schools. The goal is to
protect Civil Rights among the students. and they
offer the same opportunity in the public education. It
is an instance of affirmative step to compensate that
influence on previous discrimination. The
action involves compensatory justice.
7. Supporters of Desegregation
There are supporters
of desegregation where busing
emphasize the
present inequalities would not be
great and the desegregation for
education are going to move in
ending and developing society. It
shares that American education had
been involved to guarantee
the society where
the class hierarchy had been
reduced. There was social mobility
and it is both downward and
upward. It had increased
significantly. Busing is going to
reduce creation in
permanent underclass in United St
ates.
8. Busing and Budget of School
There are supporters on busing who believe that the
path had been affordable to get
the school desegregation. At the time of admitting the
first costs of program on busing could be great. It
directs statistics showing operating costs. The busing
is mandatory and it is less than 5 % of the total budget
of the school.
9. Contact Us
Visit :
https://www.dreamassig
nment.com/school-law-
assignment-help
Email:
info@dreamassignment.
com
Call : +14235002312