This document provides guidance on referencing different resource types using the Harvard referencing style. It explains that referencing acknowledges the ideas of others, helps avoid plagiarism, and demonstrates background research. Key points covered include:
- Referencing requires citations in text matched to a reference list
- Direct quotes require quotation marks and page numbers
- Paraphrases require in-text citations without page numbers
- The reference list is alphabetical by author surname
- Examples are provided for referencing various resource types like websites, reports, magazines, images, broadcasts and more.
This document summarizes a workshop on research metrics and citation impact. It discusses different types of metrics to measure journal and article impact, including journal impact factor, CiteScore, SJR, citation count, field-weighted citation impact, and altmetrics. It provides information on how to find these metrics in databases like Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, and journal metric sites. The document also discusses author-level metrics like h-index and how to create and manage author profiles in ResearcherID, Scopus, and ORCID to track research outputs and citations.
This document provides guidance on writing a literature review for a research paper. It explains that a literature review analyzes and synthesizes other sources related to the research topic in order to justify and support how the investigation may answer the research question. It advises finding sources from academic databases and references rather than only internet searches, as academic sources are more reliable. The literature review should compare, contrast, and evaluate aspects of the topic to explain the investigation in a logical narrative.
1) The document provides guidelines for submitting manuscripts to the Social Science Quarterly journal, including formatting requirements for submissions, the review process, requirements for revisions, and replication policy.
2) Manuscripts should be under 25 double-spaced pages with references and notes, and 5 copies should be submitted. The review process is double-blind.
3) Revisions are invited for about a third of submissions, and the author should address the most important reviewer comments in the revision along with a letter to the editor.
This document discusses different types of evidence that can be used to support arguments in persuasive papers. It provides examples like quotes, statistics, graphs and charts. Evidence should be incorporated to strengthen the paper's stance when the writer cannot find the right words, needs to show consequences or pros and cons, or thinks the reader may not understand the topic. When including evidence, the writer must explain its significance and connection to the thesis, and avoid assuming the evidence speaks for itself or adding too many personal experiences.
Elsevier's Scopus.com upgraded the Journal Analyzer with Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP), which measures a source's contextual impact, and SCImago Journal Rank (SJR), which measures the scientific prestige of scholarly sources.
These indicators will be applied to all journals indexed by Scopus and will be freely available to both subscribers and non-subscribers @ scopus.com and www.journalmetrics.com
This document provides guidance on evaluating information sources using the C.A.R.P. test - evaluating sources for Currency, Accuracy, Reliability, and Purpose. It examines how to apply this test to different resource types like websites, government reports, journal articles, and provides tips for evaluating specific resources. Key factors include checking publication dates, author qualifications, peer-review status, and domain names for websites. Government and peer-reviewed journal articles generally require less careful evaluation than other sources like commercial websites. The document aims to teach readers how to critically assess sources to determine their usefulness and trustworthiness.
Journal and author impact measures Assessing your impact (h-index and beyond)Aboul Ella Hassanien
This seminar presented at faculty of Computers Monofiya university on Saturday 12 Dec. 2015. Seminar for researchers and graduate students at Egyptian universities to increase awareness of the importance of publication and scientific research and how to increase the researchers weight, its calculation, and calculation of magazines weight and how to calculate new weights that differ from the impact of the magazines and tips for students attic studies on how to increase citation of the published research papers and How to use open access publishing. In addition discuss the Issues in the field of open access including its advantages and disadvantages
This document provides guidance on referencing different resource types using the Harvard referencing style. It explains that referencing acknowledges the ideas of others, helps avoid plagiarism, and demonstrates background research. Key points covered include:
- Referencing requires citations in text matched to a reference list
- Direct quotes require quotation marks and page numbers
- Paraphrases require in-text citations without page numbers
- The reference list is alphabetical by author surname
- Examples are provided for referencing various resource types like websites, reports, magazines, images, broadcasts and more.
This document summarizes a workshop on research metrics and citation impact. It discusses different types of metrics to measure journal and article impact, including journal impact factor, CiteScore, SJR, citation count, field-weighted citation impact, and altmetrics. It provides information on how to find these metrics in databases like Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, and journal metric sites. The document also discusses author-level metrics like h-index and how to create and manage author profiles in ResearcherID, Scopus, and ORCID to track research outputs and citations.
This document provides guidance on writing a literature review for a research paper. It explains that a literature review analyzes and synthesizes other sources related to the research topic in order to justify and support how the investigation may answer the research question. It advises finding sources from academic databases and references rather than only internet searches, as academic sources are more reliable. The literature review should compare, contrast, and evaluate aspects of the topic to explain the investigation in a logical narrative.
1) The document provides guidelines for submitting manuscripts to the Social Science Quarterly journal, including formatting requirements for submissions, the review process, requirements for revisions, and replication policy.
2) Manuscripts should be under 25 double-spaced pages with references and notes, and 5 copies should be submitted. The review process is double-blind.
3) Revisions are invited for about a third of submissions, and the author should address the most important reviewer comments in the revision along with a letter to the editor.
This document discusses different types of evidence that can be used to support arguments in persuasive papers. It provides examples like quotes, statistics, graphs and charts. Evidence should be incorporated to strengthen the paper's stance when the writer cannot find the right words, needs to show consequences or pros and cons, or thinks the reader may not understand the topic. When including evidence, the writer must explain its significance and connection to the thesis, and avoid assuming the evidence speaks for itself or adding too many personal experiences.
Elsevier's Scopus.com upgraded the Journal Analyzer with Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP), which measures a source's contextual impact, and SCImago Journal Rank (SJR), which measures the scientific prestige of scholarly sources.
These indicators will be applied to all journals indexed by Scopus and will be freely available to both subscribers and non-subscribers @ scopus.com and www.journalmetrics.com
This document provides guidance on evaluating information sources using the C.A.R.P. test - evaluating sources for Currency, Accuracy, Reliability, and Purpose. It examines how to apply this test to different resource types like websites, government reports, journal articles, and provides tips for evaluating specific resources. Key factors include checking publication dates, author qualifications, peer-review status, and domain names for websites. Government and peer-reviewed journal articles generally require less careful evaluation than other sources like commercial websites. The document aims to teach readers how to critically assess sources to determine their usefulness and trustworthiness.
Journal and author impact measures Assessing your impact (h-index and beyond)Aboul Ella Hassanien
This seminar presented at faculty of Computers Monofiya university on Saturday 12 Dec. 2015. Seminar for researchers and graduate students at Egyptian universities to increase awareness of the importance of publication and scientific research and how to increase the researchers weight, its calculation, and calculation of magazines weight and how to calculate new weights that differ from the impact of the magazines and tips for students attic studies on how to increase citation of the published research papers and How to use open access publishing. In addition discuss the Issues in the field of open access including its advantages and disadvantages
Impact Factor Journals as per JCR, SNIP, SJR, IPP, CiteScoreSaptarshi Ghosh
Journal-level metrics
Metrics have become a fact of life in many - if not all - fields of research and scholarship. In an age of information abundance (often termed ‘information overload’), having a shorthand for the signals for where in the ocean of published literature to focus our limited attention has become increasingly important.
Research metrics are sometimes controversial, especially when in popular usage they become proxies for multidimensional concepts such as research quality or impact. Each metric may offer a different emphasis based on its underlying data source, method of calculation, or context of use. For this reason, Elsevier promotes the responsible use of research metrics encapsulated in two “golden rules”. Those are: always use both qualitative and quantitative input for decisions (i.e. expert opinion alongside metrics), and always use more than one research metric as the quantitative input. This second rule acknowledges that performance cannot be expressed by any single metric, as well as the fact that all metrics have specific strengths and weaknesses. Therefore, using multiple complementary metrics can help to provide a more complete picture and reflect different aspects of research productivity and impact in the final assessment. ( Elsevier)
This document provides an overview of citation indexing and describes some key tools and concepts. Citation indexing traces the use of ideas across research by identifying papers that cite older publications. The Institute for Scientific Information pioneered citation indexing databases like the Web of Science. While comprehensive, the WoS has limitations in coverage of non-English language and developing world journals. The Indian Citation Index was created to index more Indian publications and support research evaluation in India. Impact factors are calculated based on citations in the Journal Citation Reports to measure journal influence.
This document defines and explains several metrics used to measure the impact and quality of academic journals, including:
1. Impact factor, which measures the average number of citations to recent articles over a 2 year period.
2. 5-year impact factor, eigenfactor, article influence, SJR, and SNIP, which also measure citations but use different calculation methods.
3. Review speed and online publication time, which indicate how quickly journals process submissions and make articles available.
The document discusses research performance measurement (RPM) and metrics used to evaluate researchers and research output. RPM is used to identify research trends, evaluate researchers for tenure and promotion, support funding and grant applications, track institutional research performance, and inform policy decisions. Key metrics discussed include the h-index, which measures both research productivity and citation impact, and the impact factor, which indicates the average number of citations to articles published in a journal. The document provides details on calculating the h-index and where to find impact factors listed in the Journal Citation Reports.
This document provides an overview of finding information in the interdisciplinary field of environmental studies. It discusses disciplines within environmental science like atmospheric science, biology, and ecology. It also reviews research strategies and databases that can be used to search for information on topics within environmental science, such as climate change. Sample searches are demonstrated using databases like Academic Search Premier, Scopus, and LexisNexis. Tips are provided for evaluating search results and websites.
The document discusses various metrics for measuring the impact of authors, journals, and articles. It describes the h-index, m-quotient, and g-index for measuring an author's impact based on their scholarly output and citations. Journal Impact Factor and SJR are discussed for comparing journals. Metrics for articles include citations in databases like Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar as well as altmetrics from social media. Broadening research impact involves platforms like Academia.edu, Mendeley, ResearchGate, and Twitter.
This document discusses journal impact factors and citation analysis. It explains that journal impact factors are calculated based on the average number of citations to articles published in a journal in the past two years. The impact factor helps evaluate a journal's relative importance but should not be used to evaluate individual papers or researchers. Citation analysis is complicated by differences in citation patterns between fields and a skewed distribution where a few papers receive many citations while most receive few. Benchmarks provided by tools like Essential Science Indicators can help contextualize research metrics like citations but evaluation requires a holistic approach combining both quantitative and qualitative methods.
AI tools can help simplify and enhance the essay writing process. They utilize natural language processing and machine learning to generate coherent text. Writers can use AI at various stages, including generating topic ideas, crafting thesis statements, and writing drafts. The document provides steps on how to use an AI tool called MyEssayWriter.ai, including entering topics and essay details to produce topic ideas and thesis statements tailored to assignments. AI streamlines essay writing while helping to produce high-quality work.
Annotated Bibliography Assignment SheetFor your upcoming literat.docxdurantheseldine
Annotated Bibliography Assignment Sheet
For your upcoming literature review, your team is required to gather 10 published sources which address your research question. Divide your research task among team members, requiring each person to find four recently published articles from a reliable journal or other professional source. Out of all those gathered, the team will eventually need to decide on the 10 best, and those sources will be used for your literature review. Before you send members off to do research individually, talk to each other about which databases to use to ensure you are not all using the same one.
The annotated bibliography is a report of the outcome of your search for me, your project supervisor. Based on your annotated bibliography, I will be able to assess whether you are conducting your library research efficiently, and whether you are ready to draft your literature review. I will let you know whether you should proceed or change your research strategy or approach. Therefore, before you get too far along in this process, send me an email containing the citations for the articles you PLAN to use (or show me in class), so if I see any problems, they can be corrected BEFORE you write your annotated bibliography or your literature review.
IMPORTANT:
· All team members should look for articles which address your team’s research question; do NOT decide ahead of time what you think the subtopics are and then ask each team member to research those separately. You should all focus on your team’s research question, allowing the authors to “tell” YOU what the important issues are dealing with your subject.
· To be able to write the literature review, everyone on the team must READ and subsequently USE all the articles, so don’t view them as “my articles” and “your articles.” The sources you find become part of your TEAM’S sources, and much of the success of your project rests on their relevance and usefulness.
· Be sure to make copies or email copies of each article to your team. Do NOT print out multiple copies in the computer room.
· Make sure the articles you choose are recently published, credible, and narrowly focused on your topic.
Each annotation includes the following:
· The full bibliographical citation in APA and one paragraph containing two elements:
· a descriptive abstract and
· a statement of relevance toyour topic
The descriptive abstract explains what the article covers and summarizes key points. It should establish the credibility of the author, explain the work’s primary purpose, and compare this work with others when appropriate. Add to this the statement of relevance, a sentence or two that concludes your paragraph by explaining how this source is related to your topic. It notes specific information found in the article that may prove useful in determining a solution to the problem.
FORMAT:
Sources should appear in alphabetical order according to the author’s last name. Justify left the first line .
PSYC 2301 & PSYC 2319 Semester Assignment3
PSYC 2301 & PSYC 2319 SEMESTER ASSIGNMENT
ARTICLE CRITIQUE
Purpose:
This assignment is to help the student improve his/her ability to use a library database to locate primary references, to improve their ability to paraphrase information, to create a more objective mindset in evaluating data, and to develop a document using a scientific approach to writing (American Psychological Association (APA) style). Please be aware that it IS NOT POSSIBLE to pass this course without doing this assignment.
Components:
Step 1: Database Assignment: Locate the Psychology Research Guide through the El Centro Library website, and using one of the two databases listed to locate a professional, research based, journal article from a psychology related journal. To qualify: the journal must be a professional (not student) psychology academic journal, must be published in the past five years, and must be research-oriented. The article must have full text availability and must have references. You may seek the help of a librarian, but you must be able to locate the article yourself if asked to do so. You MUST upload your article to the appropriate eCampus link for my approval BEFORE you proceed with the rest of the assignment.
Step 2: Creating a Cover Page and a References Page: In this assignment you are asked to create a cover page and a reference page based on the article you selected from the library database. Once you begin this assignment, you must use the article you selected for the rest of the semester. The cover page and the references page must adhere to APA standards, and they will be graded accordingly. The Cover page must have an APA running head and title which are appropriately related to the content of the article. The running head must also be placed correctly formatted on all pages of the assignment as shown on the template. The Title Page must accurately contain the required information as detailed on the template. The Reference Page must present author name(s) and initials, year of publication, title of article, title of journal, volume number, issue number, page numbers, and the digital object identifier (DOI) if available. You are required to place this in the appropriate APA style, double spaced and with a hanging indentation of .5 inches. Title and Reference pages that are not correctly done according to APA style will not be accepted and must be redone before moving on to the next step of the overall assignment.
Step 3: Writing an Introduction: In this assignment, you must indicate why the authors considered this to be important research and why they approached the topic as they did. This assignment is expected to involve a full page and must include appropriate citations, including both parenthetical and non-parenthetical citations.
Step 4: Writing the Summary: Provide an in-depth summary of the article. This must include the who, what, when, where, and how of the articl ...
This document summarizes a virtual workshop on thesis writing and publication organized by Lavender Literacy Club and Cape Comorin Trust in collaboration with other institutions. It discusses research metrics, which are quantitative measures used to assess scholarly research outputs and impacts. Various metrics are explained, including journal metrics like impact factor, author metrics like h-index, and alternative metrics. The importance of research profiles, publishing ethics, and increasing research visibility and impacts are also covered.
Journal ranking metrices new perspective in journal performance managementAboul Ella Hassanien
The document discusses various metrics for evaluating journals and research, including impact factor, immediacy index, and the h-index. It provides definitions and explanations of how these metrics are calculated. For example, it explains that impact factor is calculated by dividing the number of citations in the current year by the total number of articles published in the previous two years. It also discusses some limitations and criticisms of solely relying on impact factor for evaluation.
Journal ranking metrices new perspective in journal performance managementAboul Ella Hassanien
The document discusses various metrics for evaluating journals and research, including impact factor, immediacy index, and the h-index. It provides definitions and explanations of how these metrics are calculated. For example, it explains that impact factor is calculated by dividing the number of citations in the current year by the total number of articles published in the previous two years. It also discusses some limitations and criticisms of solely relying on impact factor for evaluations.
Publishing in a High Quality Journal.pptxIbrahim573144
The document provides biographical information about two speakers for an upcoming seminar on publishing in high-quality journals:
1) Alvin K. Mulashani, who has degrees in oil and natural gas engineering from XSYU and CUG and works in the School of Earth Resources at Wuhan University.
2) Ibrahim AL-Wesabi, who has degrees in artificial intelligence from SU and CUG and is pursuing a PhD in artificial intelligence and optimization algorithms for renewable energy resources at Wuhan University.
The seminar will be held on September 22nd at the Silk Road Institute campus and discuss topics such as introducing artificial intelligence and bioinspired algorithms, using AI in renewable energy, publishing background,
1 Writing & Documenting in APA A Concise Gui.docxhoney725342
1
Writing & Documenting in APA
A Concise Guide for GU Students
Part Four: Proofreading; APA & the Internet
Tanya A. Klatt, MA; Timothy P. Goss, MA;
and Alexander V. Ames, Ph.D
2
Proofreading for APA style
As we move into the final stage of this writing project, it might be a good idea to go back and
review the entire APA guide to ensure that you have all of the pieces in place for this final step.
Throughout this tutorial, we will discuss some of the key areas you need to look at when
proofreading to make sure your paper meets APA standards.
Checking your Work
This checklist should be used to ensure that your papers and documents are in proper APA style.
Formatting:
● Font used is 12 pt Times New Roman.
● One inch margins on all sides.
● Running head is the title of your paper (up to 50 characters; no longer than five words).
● Running head (abbreviated title) is flush left and in ALL-CAPS.
● Page number is top, flush right, starting on the title page
In-text Citations:
● Do you provide appropriate in-text (i.e. parenthetical) citations for all uses of external
source material?
● Do those in-text (i.e. parenthetical) citations include all of the necessary information (e.g.
author name(s), dates)?
● Do those in-text (i.e. parenthetical) citations precede the final punctuation of the
sentences in which they appear?
Reference Page:
● Is your References page separated from the last page of your paper with a page-break? It
is important that your References page begin at the top of a new page immediately
following the last page of the text of your essay, report, paper, etc. So, you need to insert
a page-break (e.g. see the “insert” menu if using Microsoft Word) after the last line of the
3
text of your paper, rather than using the Return/Enter key, to ensure that your list of
References begins at the top of the following page.
● Is your References page formatted according to the guidelines outlined above (e.g. is the
title References centered)?
Are lines following the first line in each entry, indented appropriately? Hint: the way to
ensure proper indentation is by setting/changing the hanging indent within your
document, rather than by using space or tab key.
Remember to Check Your Paper for Possible Plagiarism:
(Komm, 2012)
4
APA and the Internet
Terms to Know: If you are unfamiliar with these terms please review them in the Glossary.
database
online library
search engine
credible sources
paper mill
message boards
In many of your classes at Grantham, you will be expected to use the EBSCO library database
for your research paper and any other formal papers. Many students will often say, “I prefer to
use Google for my research.” While Google is a fantastic Internet search engine, it is not a
library database. Google will lead you to everything that ...
This document provides advice for early career researchers on publishing their first papers. It discusses managing expectations and pressures to publish, strategies for writing papers, preparing manuscripts for submission, common problems reviewers encounter, and tips for seeking feedback and revising papers in response to reviews. Key recommendations include writing with the target journal in mind, structuring papers like an hourglass, carefully writing the title and abstract, addressing all reviewer comments, and not being discouraged by initial rejections. Maintaining an active academic profile online can also help others find your work. Overall, clear communication is emphasized as important for facilitating the publication process.
Running head insert shortened title (50 characters or fewer)1MARK547399
This document provides information and guidelines for writing intelligence reports and briefings. It begins by explaining that intelligence reports should use a "bottom line up front" structure and provide concise summaries for busy policymakers. It then describes different types of intelligence products, including current intelligence reports, warning analyses, national intelligence estimates, and in-depth reports. The document explains that intelligence writing needs to be clear, logical, and meet the specific needs of its intended audience. It also discusses how intelligence is briefed orally to policymakers in addition to being provided in written form.
The document discusses various academic metrics used to measure the impact and quality of scholarly work, including journals, authors, and institutions. It defines ISSN numbers, journal finders, DOIs, SJR, impact factors, indexing services, and Google Scholar metrics. It explains how to calculate the h-index, i10-index, and g-index for authors. It distinguishes between reference lists and bibliographies and discusses various referencing styles. It provides examples of citations in the Vancouver referencing style. The document is intended as a guide to help understand different methods used to evaluate academic work.
Evidence-Based Patient-Centered Concept Map Scoring Guide
CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED
Design an individualized,
patient-centered concept
map, based upon the best
available evidence for
treating a patient's specific
health, economic, and
cultural needs.
Does not design an
individualized, patient-
centered concept map
based on the best
available evidence for
treating a patient's
specific health, economic,
and cultural needs.
Designs a patient-centered
concept map, but the map
is not well individualized to
treat a specific patient's
health, economic, or
cultural needs.
Designs an individualized,
patient-centered concept
map based on the best
available evidence for
treating a patient's specific
health, economic, and
cultural needs.
Designs an individualized, patient-
centered concept map based on the best
available evidence for treating a patient's
specific health, economic, and cultural
needs. Outcomes for each diagnosis are
aligned and complementary.
Analyze the needs of a
patient, and those of their
family, to ensure that the
intervention in the concept
map will be relevant and
appropriate for their beliefs,
values, and lifestyle.
Does not analyze the
needs of a patient, and
those of their family, to
ensure that the
intervention in the concept
map will be relevant and
appropriate for their
beliefs, values, and
lifestyle.
Attempts to analyze the
needs of a patient, and
those of their family, to
ensure that the
intervention in the concept
map will be relevant and
appropriate for their
beliefs, values, and
lifestyle.
Analyzes the needs of a
patient, and those of their
family, to ensure that the
intervention in the concept
map will be relevant and
appropriate for their beliefs,
values, and lifestyle.
Analyzes the needs of a patient, and
those of their family, to ensure that the
intervention in the concept map will be
relevant and appropriate for their beliefs,
values, and lifestyle. Identifies
unanswered questions or areas of
uncertainty where further information
could improve the analysis.
Apply strategies for
communicating with the
patient and their family in an
ethical, culturally sensitive,
and inclusive way.
Does not develop a
strategy for
communicating with
patients and their families
in an ethical, culturally
sensitive, and inclusive
way.
Develops a strategy for
communicating with
patients and their families
that falls short of being
ethical, culturally sensitive,
or inclusive.
Applies strategies for
communicating with the
patient and their family in
an ethical, culturally
sensitive, and inclusive
way.
Applies strategies for communicating
with the patient and their family in an
ethical, culturally sensitive, and inclusive
way. Notes specific ways in which the
communication strategies promote
honest communication, facilitate sharing
only information that is permitted under
data privacy rules, and help to make
complex medical terms and concepts
understandable to your patient and their
family, regard.
This document outlines an assignment for students to complete an incident analysis project. It provides instructions for two parts: 1) describing a writing-related incident and 2) creating a project plan based on that incident. For part 1, students are asked to describe an experience with writing that interests or troubles them in 750-1000 words. For part 2, they must identify a topic, potential research questions, and significance of studying the topic. The document provides guidance on drafting each part and establishing a timeline for rough and final drafts. It emphasizes using details to describe the incident and connecting the incident clearly to the proposed research topic.
Impact Factor Journals as per JCR, SNIP, SJR, IPP, CiteScoreSaptarshi Ghosh
Journal-level metrics
Metrics have become a fact of life in many - if not all - fields of research and scholarship. In an age of information abundance (often termed ‘information overload’), having a shorthand for the signals for where in the ocean of published literature to focus our limited attention has become increasingly important.
Research metrics are sometimes controversial, especially when in popular usage they become proxies for multidimensional concepts such as research quality or impact. Each metric may offer a different emphasis based on its underlying data source, method of calculation, or context of use. For this reason, Elsevier promotes the responsible use of research metrics encapsulated in two “golden rules”. Those are: always use both qualitative and quantitative input for decisions (i.e. expert opinion alongside metrics), and always use more than one research metric as the quantitative input. This second rule acknowledges that performance cannot be expressed by any single metric, as well as the fact that all metrics have specific strengths and weaknesses. Therefore, using multiple complementary metrics can help to provide a more complete picture and reflect different aspects of research productivity and impact in the final assessment. ( Elsevier)
This document provides an overview of citation indexing and describes some key tools and concepts. Citation indexing traces the use of ideas across research by identifying papers that cite older publications. The Institute for Scientific Information pioneered citation indexing databases like the Web of Science. While comprehensive, the WoS has limitations in coverage of non-English language and developing world journals. The Indian Citation Index was created to index more Indian publications and support research evaluation in India. Impact factors are calculated based on citations in the Journal Citation Reports to measure journal influence.
This document defines and explains several metrics used to measure the impact and quality of academic journals, including:
1. Impact factor, which measures the average number of citations to recent articles over a 2 year period.
2. 5-year impact factor, eigenfactor, article influence, SJR, and SNIP, which also measure citations but use different calculation methods.
3. Review speed and online publication time, which indicate how quickly journals process submissions and make articles available.
The document discusses research performance measurement (RPM) and metrics used to evaluate researchers and research output. RPM is used to identify research trends, evaluate researchers for tenure and promotion, support funding and grant applications, track institutional research performance, and inform policy decisions. Key metrics discussed include the h-index, which measures both research productivity and citation impact, and the impact factor, which indicates the average number of citations to articles published in a journal. The document provides details on calculating the h-index and where to find impact factors listed in the Journal Citation Reports.
This document provides an overview of finding information in the interdisciplinary field of environmental studies. It discusses disciplines within environmental science like atmospheric science, biology, and ecology. It also reviews research strategies and databases that can be used to search for information on topics within environmental science, such as climate change. Sample searches are demonstrated using databases like Academic Search Premier, Scopus, and LexisNexis. Tips are provided for evaluating search results and websites.
The document discusses various metrics for measuring the impact of authors, journals, and articles. It describes the h-index, m-quotient, and g-index for measuring an author's impact based on their scholarly output and citations. Journal Impact Factor and SJR are discussed for comparing journals. Metrics for articles include citations in databases like Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar as well as altmetrics from social media. Broadening research impact involves platforms like Academia.edu, Mendeley, ResearchGate, and Twitter.
This document discusses journal impact factors and citation analysis. It explains that journal impact factors are calculated based on the average number of citations to articles published in a journal in the past two years. The impact factor helps evaluate a journal's relative importance but should not be used to evaluate individual papers or researchers. Citation analysis is complicated by differences in citation patterns between fields and a skewed distribution where a few papers receive many citations while most receive few. Benchmarks provided by tools like Essential Science Indicators can help contextualize research metrics like citations but evaluation requires a holistic approach combining both quantitative and qualitative methods.
AI tools can help simplify and enhance the essay writing process. They utilize natural language processing and machine learning to generate coherent text. Writers can use AI at various stages, including generating topic ideas, crafting thesis statements, and writing drafts. The document provides steps on how to use an AI tool called MyEssayWriter.ai, including entering topics and essay details to produce topic ideas and thesis statements tailored to assignments. AI streamlines essay writing while helping to produce high-quality work.
Annotated Bibliography Assignment SheetFor your upcoming literat.docxdurantheseldine
Annotated Bibliography Assignment Sheet
For your upcoming literature review, your team is required to gather 10 published sources which address your research question. Divide your research task among team members, requiring each person to find four recently published articles from a reliable journal or other professional source. Out of all those gathered, the team will eventually need to decide on the 10 best, and those sources will be used for your literature review. Before you send members off to do research individually, talk to each other about which databases to use to ensure you are not all using the same one.
The annotated bibliography is a report of the outcome of your search for me, your project supervisor. Based on your annotated bibliography, I will be able to assess whether you are conducting your library research efficiently, and whether you are ready to draft your literature review. I will let you know whether you should proceed or change your research strategy or approach. Therefore, before you get too far along in this process, send me an email containing the citations for the articles you PLAN to use (or show me in class), so if I see any problems, they can be corrected BEFORE you write your annotated bibliography or your literature review.
IMPORTANT:
· All team members should look for articles which address your team’s research question; do NOT decide ahead of time what you think the subtopics are and then ask each team member to research those separately. You should all focus on your team’s research question, allowing the authors to “tell” YOU what the important issues are dealing with your subject.
· To be able to write the literature review, everyone on the team must READ and subsequently USE all the articles, so don’t view them as “my articles” and “your articles.” The sources you find become part of your TEAM’S sources, and much of the success of your project rests on their relevance and usefulness.
· Be sure to make copies or email copies of each article to your team. Do NOT print out multiple copies in the computer room.
· Make sure the articles you choose are recently published, credible, and narrowly focused on your topic.
Each annotation includes the following:
· The full bibliographical citation in APA and one paragraph containing two elements:
· a descriptive abstract and
· a statement of relevance toyour topic
The descriptive abstract explains what the article covers and summarizes key points. It should establish the credibility of the author, explain the work’s primary purpose, and compare this work with others when appropriate. Add to this the statement of relevance, a sentence or two that concludes your paragraph by explaining how this source is related to your topic. It notes specific information found in the article that may prove useful in determining a solution to the problem.
FORMAT:
Sources should appear in alphabetical order according to the author’s last name. Justify left the first line .
PSYC 2301 & PSYC 2319 Semester Assignment3
PSYC 2301 & PSYC 2319 SEMESTER ASSIGNMENT
ARTICLE CRITIQUE
Purpose:
This assignment is to help the student improve his/her ability to use a library database to locate primary references, to improve their ability to paraphrase information, to create a more objective mindset in evaluating data, and to develop a document using a scientific approach to writing (American Psychological Association (APA) style). Please be aware that it IS NOT POSSIBLE to pass this course without doing this assignment.
Components:
Step 1: Database Assignment: Locate the Psychology Research Guide through the El Centro Library website, and using one of the two databases listed to locate a professional, research based, journal article from a psychology related journal. To qualify: the journal must be a professional (not student) psychology academic journal, must be published in the past five years, and must be research-oriented. The article must have full text availability and must have references. You may seek the help of a librarian, but you must be able to locate the article yourself if asked to do so. You MUST upload your article to the appropriate eCampus link for my approval BEFORE you proceed with the rest of the assignment.
Step 2: Creating a Cover Page and a References Page: In this assignment you are asked to create a cover page and a reference page based on the article you selected from the library database. Once you begin this assignment, you must use the article you selected for the rest of the semester. The cover page and the references page must adhere to APA standards, and they will be graded accordingly. The Cover page must have an APA running head and title which are appropriately related to the content of the article. The running head must also be placed correctly formatted on all pages of the assignment as shown on the template. The Title Page must accurately contain the required information as detailed on the template. The Reference Page must present author name(s) and initials, year of publication, title of article, title of journal, volume number, issue number, page numbers, and the digital object identifier (DOI) if available. You are required to place this in the appropriate APA style, double spaced and with a hanging indentation of .5 inches. Title and Reference pages that are not correctly done according to APA style will not be accepted and must be redone before moving on to the next step of the overall assignment.
Step 3: Writing an Introduction: In this assignment, you must indicate why the authors considered this to be important research and why they approached the topic as they did. This assignment is expected to involve a full page and must include appropriate citations, including both parenthetical and non-parenthetical citations.
Step 4: Writing the Summary: Provide an in-depth summary of the article. This must include the who, what, when, where, and how of the articl ...
This document summarizes a virtual workshop on thesis writing and publication organized by Lavender Literacy Club and Cape Comorin Trust in collaboration with other institutions. It discusses research metrics, which are quantitative measures used to assess scholarly research outputs and impacts. Various metrics are explained, including journal metrics like impact factor, author metrics like h-index, and alternative metrics. The importance of research profiles, publishing ethics, and increasing research visibility and impacts are also covered.
Journal ranking metrices new perspective in journal performance managementAboul Ella Hassanien
The document discusses various metrics for evaluating journals and research, including impact factor, immediacy index, and the h-index. It provides definitions and explanations of how these metrics are calculated. For example, it explains that impact factor is calculated by dividing the number of citations in the current year by the total number of articles published in the previous two years. It also discusses some limitations and criticisms of solely relying on impact factor for evaluation.
Journal ranking metrices new perspective in journal performance managementAboul Ella Hassanien
The document discusses various metrics for evaluating journals and research, including impact factor, immediacy index, and the h-index. It provides definitions and explanations of how these metrics are calculated. For example, it explains that impact factor is calculated by dividing the number of citations in the current year by the total number of articles published in the previous two years. It also discusses some limitations and criticisms of solely relying on impact factor for evaluations.
Publishing in a High Quality Journal.pptxIbrahim573144
The document provides biographical information about two speakers for an upcoming seminar on publishing in high-quality journals:
1) Alvin K. Mulashani, who has degrees in oil and natural gas engineering from XSYU and CUG and works in the School of Earth Resources at Wuhan University.
2) Ibrahim AL-Wesabi, who has degrees in artificial intelligence from SU and CUG and is pursuing a PhD in artificial intelligence and optimization algorithms for renewable energy resources at Wuhan University.
The seminar will be held on September 22nd at the Silk Road Institute campus and discuss topics such as introducing artificial intelligence and bioinspired algorithms, using AI in renewable energy, publishing background,
1 Writing & Documenting in APA A Concise Gui.docxhoney725342
1
Writing & Documenting in APA
A Concise Guide for GU Students
Part Four: Proofreading; APA & the Internet
Tanya A. Klatt, MA; Timothy P. Goss, MA;
and Alexander V. Ames, Ph.D
2
Proofreading for APA style
As we move into the final stage of this writing project, it might be a good idea to go back and
review the entire APA guide to ensure that you have all of the pieces in place for this final step.
Throughout this tutorial, we will discuss some of the key areas you need to look at when
proofreading to make sure your paper meets APA standards.
Checking your Work
This checklist should be used to ensure that your papers and documents are in proper APA style.
Formatting:
● Font used is 12 pt Times New Roman.
● One inch margins on all sides.
● Running head is the title of your paper (up to 50 characters; no longer than five words).
● Running head (abbreviated title) is flush left and in ALL-CAPS.
● Page number is top, flush right, starting on the title page
In-text Citations:
● Do you provide appropriate in-text (i.e. parenthetical) citations for all uses of external
source material?
● Do those in-text (i.e. parenthetical) citations include all of the necessary information (e.g.
author name(s), dates)?
● Do those in-text (i.e. parenthetical) citations precede the final punctuation of the
sentences in which they appear?
Reference Page:
● Is your References page separated from the last page of your paper with a page-break? It
is important that your References page begin at the top of a new page immediately
following the last page of the text of your essay, report, paper, etc. So, you need to insert
a page-break (e.g. see the “insert” menu if using Microsoft Word) after the last line of the
3
text of your paper, rather than using the Return/Enter key, to ensure that your list of
References begins at the top of the following page.
● Is your References page formatted according to the guidelines outlined above (e.g. is the
title References centered)?
Are lines following the first line in each entry, indented appropriately? Hint: the way to
ensure proper indentation is by setting/changing the hanging indent within your
document, rather than by using space or tab key.
Remember to Check Your Paper for Possible Plagiarism:
(Komm, 2012)
4
APA and the Internet
Terms to Know: If you are unfamiliar with these terms please review them in the Glossary.
database
online library
search engine
credible sources
paper mill
message boards
In many of your classes at Grantham, you will be expected to use the EBSCO library database
for your research paper and any other formal papers. Many students will often say, “I prefer to
use Google for my research.” While Google is a fantastic Internet search engine, it is not a
library database. Google will lead you to everything that ...
This document provides advice for early career researchers on publishing their first papers. It discusses managing expectations and pressures to publish, strategies for writing papers, preparing manuscripts for submission, common problems reviewers encounter, and tips for seeking feedback and revising papers in response to reviews. Key recommendations include writing with the target journal in mind, structuring papers like an hourglass, carefully writing the title and abstract, addressing all reviewer comments, and not being discouraged by initial rejections. Maintaining an active academic profile online can also help others find your work. Overall, clear communication is emphasized as important for facilitating the publication process.
Running head insert shortened title (50 characters or fewer)1MARK547399
This document provides information and guidelines for writing intelligence reports and briefings. It begins by explaining that intelligence reports should use a "bottom line up front" structure and provide concise summaries for busy policymakers. It then describes different types of intelligence products, including current intelligence reports, warning analyses, national intelligence estimates, and in-depth reports. The document explains that intelligence writing needs to be clear, logical, and meet the specific needs of its intended audience. It also discusses how intelligence is briefed orally to policymakers in addition to being provided in written form.
The document discusses various academic metrics used to measure the impact and quality of scholarly work, including journals, authors, and institutions. It defines ISSN numbers, journal finders, DOIs, SJR, impact factors, indexing services, and Google Scholar metrics. It explains how to calculate the h-index, i10-index, and g-index for authors. It distinguishes between reference lists and bibliographies and discusses various referencing styles. It provides examples of citations in the Vancouver referencing style. The document is intended as a guide to help understand different methods used to evaluate academic work.
Evidence-Based Patient-Centered Concept Map Scoring Guide
CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED
Design an individualized,
patient-centered concept
map, based upon the best
available evidence for
treating a patient's specific
health, economic, and
cultural needs.
Does not design an
individualized, patient-
centered concept map
based on the best
available evidence for
treating a patient's
specific health, economic,
and cultural needs.
Designs a patient-centered
concept map, but the map
is not well individualized to
treat a specific patient's
health, economic, or
cultural needs.
Designs an individualized,
patient-centered concept
map based on the best
available evidence for
treating a patient's specific
health, economic, and
cultural needs.
Designs an individualized, patient-
centered concept map based on the best
available evidence for treating a patient's
specific health, economic, and cultural
needs. Outcomes for each diagnosis are
aligned and complementary.
Analyze the needs of a
patient, and those of their
family, to ensure that the
intervention in the concept
map will be relevant and
appropriate for their beliefs,
values, and lifestyle.
Does not analyze the
needs of a patient, and
those of their family, to
ensure that the
intervention in the concept
map will be relevant and
appropriate for their
beliefs, values, and
lifestyle.
Attempts to analyze the
needs of a patient, and
those of their family, to
ensure that the
intervention in the concept
map will be relevant and
appropriate for their
beliefs, values, and
lifestyle.
Analyzes the needs of a
patient, and those of their
family, to ensure that the
intervention in the concept
map will be relevant and
appropriate for their beliefs,
values, and lifestyle.
Analyzes the needs of a patient, and
those of their family, to ensure that the
intervention in the concept map will be
relevant and appropriate for their beliefs,
values, and lifestyle. Identifies
unanswered questions or areas of
uncertainty where further information
could improve the analysis.
Apply strategies for
communicating with the
patient and their family in an
ethical, culturally sensitive,
and inclusive way.
Does not develop a
strategy for
communicating with
patients and their families
in an ethical, culturally
sensitive, and inclusive
way.
Develops a strategy for
communicating with
patients and their families
that falls short of being
ethical, culturally sensitive,
or inclusive.
Applies strategies for
communicating with the
patient and their family in
an ethical, culturally
sensitive, and inclusive
way.
Applies strategies for communicating
with the patient and their family in an
ethical, culturally sensitive, and inclusive
way. Notes specific ways in which the
communication strategies promote
honest communication, facilitate sharing
only information that is permitted under
data privacy rules, and help to make
complex medical terms and concepts
understandable to your patient and their
family, regard.
This document outlines an assignment for students to complete an incident analysis project. It provides instructions for two parts: 1) describing a writing-related incident and 2) creating a project plan based on that incident. For part 1, students are asked to describe an experience with writing that interests or troubles them in 750-1000 words. For part 2, they must identify a topic, potential research questions, and significance of studying the topic. The document provides guidance on drafting each part and establishing a timeline for rough and final drafts. It emphasizes using details to describe the incident and connecting the incident clearly to the proposed research topic.
Term Research Assignment FAQ’s This is an overview of ques.docxbradburgess22840
Term Research Assignment FAQ’s
This is an overview of questions received regarding the assignment. It is not all inclusive and may be
added to throughout the term.
Q. If I am working on this assignment with a partner, do we both need to turn in an
assignment?
A. No, only one assignment needs to be turned in by one of the partners. Please make sure both
names are on the memo. One of the partners must upload the assignment into D2L.
Q. Do I have to use Word to complete the assignment?
A. Yes. This is another use of what you learned this term using Word. Combine the two parts of the
assignment in to one file. You will be graded on how you used Word as well.
Q. Are there any Word format requirements?
A. Yes, the assignment must be single spaced (DO NOT use the default spacing in Word), with a 1”
margin. The font must be 10 or 11 point Times New Roman.
Q. What exactly should the completed assignment include?
A. The completed assignment is made up of two parts – both completed using Word.
1. A 1-2 page typed persuasive memo – written to Ava Stevens – from you (representing
your business, non-profit, government entity, or committee). This memo outlines HOW
you plan to persuade your audience and what your main persuasive point(s) will be and
how you will back these points up with your research. Basically it is a narrative or
outline of your argument. Think of me as your boss, and this memo is being used to
prove to me that you have the needed information to continue with this persuasion. How
you organize this memo is your choice – but you may find bullet or numbered points
helpful in presenting some of the information. Remember you cannot end a memo with
a list. There needs to be at least a one sentence close to end the memo (don’t just
stop…write for the reader). Don’t forget to use the correct second page heading for the
second page of your memo.
This memo is NOT your entire argument – it is designed to prove you are ready, with the
necessary resources, to write the persuasive argument. Don’t make the mistake of using
this memo to argue your point. Remember to write to your audience – Ava Stevens
– what does she need from you to know you are ready to write the persuasive
argument to your audience?
2. A 2-4 (or more) page typed annotated bibliography – the minimum number of sources on
this annotated bibliography is 6. Of the 6 sources, at least 3 must be from peer reviewed
academic journals. (Information is provided below to explain how to verify if the journal,
and therefore the article, is peer reviewed.)
Each source will have two paragraphs. The first paragraph is an overview of the
article. DO NOT use the abstract to write this – read the article and explain the overall
idea of the article using your own words. You are uploading this in D2L and it will be put
through Turn-it-in. Please don’t earn zero points because you plagiarized. The second
paragraph is WHA.
5Title of the Paper in Full Goes HereStudent Name Here.docxtroutmanboris
5
Title of the Paper in Full Goes Here
Student Name Here
Walden University
Course Number, Section, and Title
(Example: NURS 0000 Section 01, Title of Course)
Month, Day, Year
(enter the date submitted to instructor)
Title of the Paper
This is your introductory paragraph designed to inform the reader of what you will cover in the paper. (BSN Students - Carefully follow your course-specific Grading Rubric concerning the content that is required for your assignment and the Academic Writing Expectations [AWE] level of your course.) This template’s formatting—Times New Roman 12-point font, double spacing, 1” margins, 1/2” indentations beginning of each paragraph, page numbers, and page breaks—is set for you, and you do not need to change it. Do not add any extra spaces between the heading and the text (you may want to check Spacing under Paragraph, and make sure settings are all set to “0”). The ideas in this paper should be in your own words and supported by credible outside evidence. Cite the author, year of publication, and page number, if necessary, per APA. The introductory paragraph should receive no specific heading because the first section functions as your paper’s introduction. Build this paragraph with the following elements:
1.
Briefly detail what has been said or done regarding the topic.
2.
Explain the problem with what has been said or done.
3.
Create a purpose statement (also commonly referred to as a thesis statement) as the last sentence of this paragraph: “The purpose of this paper is to describe…”.
Level 1 Heading (Name According to the Grading Rubric Required Content)
This text will be the beginning of the body of the paper. Even though this section has a new heading, make sure to connect this section to the previous one so readers can follow along with the ideas and research presented. The first sentence, or topic sentence, in each paragraph should transition from the previous paragraph and summarize the main point in the paragraph. Make sure each paragraph addresses only one topic. When you see yourself drifting to another idea, make sure you break into a new paragraph. Avoid long paragraphs that are more than three-fourths of a page. Per our program recommendations, each paragraph should be at least 3-4 sentences in length and contain a topic sentence, evidence, analysis, and a conclusion or lead out sentence. In your paragraphs, synthesize your resources/readings into your own words and avoid using direct quotations. In the rare instances you do use a direct quotation of a historical nature from a source, the page or paragraph numbers are also included in the citation. For example, Leplante and Nolin (2014) described burnout as "a negative affective response occurring as result of chronic work stress" (p. 2). When you transition to a new idea, you should begin a new paragraph.
Another Level 1 Heading (Name According to the Grading Rubric Required Content)
Here is another Level 1 heading. Again, the to.
This document provides guidance on writing technical papers. It discusses various types of technical papers like conference papers, journal papers, and review papers. It outlines the typical structure of a paper, including the introduction, related work, presenting the idea, results and discussion, figures and tables, and conclusion. It also discusses important publishing metrics like impact factor, indexing, and the h-index. The document advises choosing appropriate journals based on their guidelines, rankings, and special issues. The overall message is that technical paper writing requires clearly presenting novel ideas, evidence to support claims, and comparing to prior work.
This document provides guidance on writing a literature review outline. It discusses including an introduction that orients the reader to the topic. The main body should include a critical analysis and synthesis of prior research on the topic. It should lead to the research questions being explored. Sections within the outline include summarizing sources, developing arguments, and concluding by relating back to the introduction and topic. The document emphasizes narrowing research, taking detailed notes, assessing sources, and thoroughly editing the outline.
Writekraft Research & Publication LLP.
We are one of the leading PhD assistance company that deals in helping PhD scholars in their Thesis, Research paper writing and publication work. We are providing custom PhD Thesis written for you exactly the way you want along with a Turnitin plagiarism report.
For more Information Contact us@ admin@writekraft.com
Or Call us @ 7753818181, 9838033084
www.writekraft.com
Writekraft Research & Publication LLP.
We are one of the leading PhD assistance company that deals in helping PhD scholars in their Thesis, Research paper writing and publication work. We are providing custom PhD Thesis written for you exactly the way you want along with a Turnitin plagiarism report.
For more Information Contact us@ admin@writekraft.com
Or Call us @ 7753818181, 9838033084
www.writekraft.com
Assessment and Planning in Educational technology.pptxKavitha Krishnan
In an education system, it is understood that assessment is only for the students, but on the other hand, the Assessment of teachers is also an important aspect of the education system that ensures teachers are providing high-quality instruction to students. The assessment process can be used to provide feedback and support for professional development, to inform decisions about teacher retention or promotion, or to evaluate teacher effectiveness for accountability purposes.
বাংলাদেশের অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা ২০২৪ [Bangladesh Economic Review 2024 Bangla.pdf] কম্পিউটার , ট্যাব ও স্মার্ট ফোন ভার্সন সহ সম্পূর্ণ বাংলা ই-বুক বা pdf বই " সুচিপত্র ...বুকমার্ক মেনু 🔖 ও হাইপার লিংক মেনু 📝👆 যুক্ত ..
আমাদের সবার জন্য খুব খুব গুরুত্বপূর্ণ একটি বই ..বিসিএস, ব্যাংক, ইউনিভার্সিটি ভর্তি ও যে কোন প্রতিযোগিতা মূলক পরীক্ষার জন্য এর খুব ইম্পরট্যান্ট একটি বিষয় ...তাছাড়া বাংলাদেশের সাম্প্রতিক যে কোন ডাটা বা তথ্য এই বইতে পাবেন ...
তাই একজন নাগরিক হিসাবে এই তথ্য গুলো আপনার জানা প্রয়োজন ...।
বিসিএস ও ব্যাংক এর লিখিত পরীক্ষা ...+এছাড়া মাধ্যমিক ও উচ্চমাধ্যমিকের স্টুডেন্টদের জন্য অনেক কাজে আসবে ...
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docxadhitya5119
This is part 1 of my Java Learning Journey. This Contains Custom methods, classes, constructors, packages, multithreading , try- catch block, finally block and more.
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...PECB
Denis is a dynamic and results-driven Chief Information Officer (CIO) with a distinguished career spanning information systems analysis and technical project management. With a proven track record of spearheading the design and delivery of cutting-edge Information Management solutions, he has consistently elevated business operations, streamlined reporting functions, and maximized process efficiency.
Certified as an ISO/IEC 27001: Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) Lead Implementer, Data Protection Officer, and Cyber Risks Analyst, Denis brings a heightened focus on data security, privacy, and cyber resilience to every endeavor.
His expertise extends across a diverse spectrum of reporting, database, and web development applications, underpinned by an exceptional grasp of data storage and virtualization technologies. His proficiency in application testing, database administration, and data cleansing ensures seamless execution of complex projects.
What sets Denis apart is his comprehensive understanding of Business and Systems Analysis technologies, honed through involvement in all phases of the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC). From meticulous requirements gathering to precise analysis, innovative design, rigorous development, thorough testing, and successful implementation, he has consistently delivered exceptional results.
Throughout his career, he has taken on multifaceted roles, from leading technical project management teams to owning solutions that drive operational excellence. His conscientious and proactive approach is unwavering, whether he is working independently or collaboratively within a team. His ability to connect with colleagues on a personal level underscores his commitment to fostering a harmonious and productive workplace environment.
Date: May 29, 2024
Tags: Information Security, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, Artificial Intelligence, GDPR
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find out more about ISO training and certification services
Training: ISO/IEC 27001 Information Security Management System - EN | PECB
ISO/IEC 42001 Artificial Intelligence Management System - EN | PECB
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) - Training Courses - EN | PECB
Webinars: https://pecb.com/webinars
Article: https://pecb.com/article
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information about PECB:
Website: https://pecb.com/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/pecb/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PECBInternational/
Slideshare: http://www.slideshare.net/PECBCERTIFICATION
हिंदी वर्णमाला पीपीटी, hindi alphabet PPT presentation, hindi varnamala PPT, Hindi Varnamala pdf, हिंदी स्वर, हिंदी व्यंजन, sikhiye hindi varnmala, dr. mulla adam ali, hindi language and literature, hindi alphabet with drawing, hindi alphabet pdf, hindi varnamala for childrens, hindi language, hindi varnamala practice for kids, https://www.drmullaadamali.com
How to Add Chatter in the odoo 17 ERP ModuleCeline George
In Odoo, the chatter is like a chat tool that helps you work together on records. You can leave notes and track things, making it easier to talk with your team and partners. Inside chatter, all communication history, activity, and changes will be displayed.
it describes the bony anatomy including the femoral head , acetabulum, labrum . also discusses the capsule , ligaments . muscle that act on the hip joint and the range of motion are outlined. factors affecting hip joint stability and weight transmission through the joint are summarized.
This slide is special for master students (MIBS & MIFB) in UUM. Also useful for readers who are interested in the topic of contemporary Islamic banking.
5. Mostly Known Fact Analytical balance Increasing Opinion 0 40 50 60 70 80 100 Your Document Thinking Index K Thinking Groups A4 Fair A2 Very Good A1 Excellent A3 Good O 66 Your Reader Impact Top Poor Good More Subjective More Objective Your Subjectivity/Objectivity Your EssayAudit result
8. Use EssayAudit to track your writing Thinking average: Group A2 68 - Very Good Reader Impact average: Poor
9. The big shift is from group K to the A groups, but not enough into the more demanding A3-A1. Use EssayAudit in research (1)
10. Most company reports are written in a traditional story-telling format, burying important comments toward the end of the document. Use EssayAudit in research (2)
11. Paper Thinking Index Reader Impact 1 Brisbane Times 64 Top 2 Australian 55 Good 3 Age 52 Poor 4 Telegraph 48 Top 5 SM Herald 44 Poor 6 WA Today 42 Poor EssayAudit can find the news story with the highest analytical content. Google’s Fast Flip lists 26 news sources on this story, but there’s no filtering. Use EssayAudit to find the best value read. Use EssayAudit to search
12. Find us on the web: www.sepado.com Follow our twits: http://twitter.com/sepado For more details email [email_address]