Virtualization is a critical part of data center computing. For your virtualization solution to succeed, it is essential that you have a storage platform capable of delivering the performance and capacity needed for a virtualized environment in a cost effective way. The Dell EqualLogic PS6210XS array, paired with a cluster of Dell PowerEdge M620 servers, ran 12 VMmark tiles for a total of 96 running VMs, and achieved a score of 14.80@12. This performance, along with its value and ease of management, make the Dell EqualLogic PS6210XS array an excellent investment.
VMmark 2.5.2 virtualization performance of the Dell Storage SC4020 arrayPrincipled Technologies
The Dell Storage SC4020 array paired with Dell PowerEdge R620 servers supported 30 tiles of the VMmark 2.5.2 virtualization benchmark for a total of 240 running virtual machines. The system achieved a score of 31.35 at 30 tiles, indicating it can handle multiple virtualized applications and hypervisor operations while maintaining strong performance. Testing showed the SC4020 provided consistent I/O operations per second around 43,000 and latency mostly under 4 milliseconds. This performance demonstrates the SC4020 is suitable for increasing virtualized workloads supported by solid-state drives without degrading storage performance.
The switching method you choose for your SBC environment can help determine performance and the experience that end-users have. We found that unifying switching with Cisco VM-FEX resulted in up to 29 percent lower latency than a solution using a traditional vSwitch when running a Citrix XenApp hosted shared desktop farm. Furthermore, the Cisco VM-FEX solution used up to 53 percent less CPU than the vSwitch solution did under extreme network conditions. In addition to these performance advantages, Cisco UCS Manager provides a central point of management and a simplified method to add vSphere hosts to the VM-FEX-enabled vSwitch, which can reduce management time and costs.
As our results show, switching to Cisco VM-FEX can provide your users with a more responsive environment.
Resource balancing comparison: VMware vSphere 6 vs. Red Hat Enterprise Virtua...Principled Technologies
Having ample resources to handle user requests is a necessity of modern virtualization solutions. Allocating and distributing those resources evenly, however, is imperative to the success of your business’s virtualized environment. In our tests, after powering on the other two servers in our three-node cluster and adding resource management features, VMware vSphere 6 improved performance by 183 percent over its baseline configuration of one active server and no resource management features. RHEV 3.5, in contrast, delivered only a 79 percent increase over its baseline. As you design your business’s infrastructure and applications, improvements such as those offered by VMware vSphere 6 DRS and Storage DRS can play a critical role by offering your users better application experiences. Optimized and modern resource management provided by VMware DRS can also help to lower your IT purchase and maintenance costs by reducing the number of servers necessary to run your applications.
Dell PowerEdge R920 and Microsoft SQL Server 2014 Migration and Benefits GuidePrincipled Technologies
The latest Dell PowerEdge R920 server is designed to provide highly scalable performance for large enterprises, with greater memory capacity, improved and expanded attached storage options, and processor architectures designed for high availability. Microsoft SQL Server 2014 is the perfect companion software to take advantage of the Dell PowerEdge R920’s impressive specifications. Upgrading has never looked more attractive, and with hardware/software upgrades must come data migration.
Migrating legacy database applications to the latest database technologies on newer Dell server platforms is a common task for businesses upgrading their hardware/software stack. As this guide shows, the process is straightforward and the cost benefits can be enormous. We calculated the savings attainable from multiple consolidation ratios, as well as how long it would take to pay off the replacement server. We found that a consolidation ratio of 13 to 1 could yield $531,725 in software savings, many times the cost of the replacement hardware itself. So not only will the business benefit from the massively-scalable current-generation Dell server technology paired with Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 running SQL Server 2014, but you can save money in the process.
VMmark virtualization performance of Micron Enterprise PCIe SSD-based SANPrincipled Technologies
The storage you use for your virtualization solution can be a significant factor in its performance and effectiveness. Two Dell PowerEdge R720 servers, paired with Micron Enterprise PCIe SSD-based SAN, ran 10 VMmark tiles for a total of 80 running VMs and achieved a score of 12.05@10 tiles, making it the top score running VMware ESXi 5.5 of the 32-core server configurations. For enterprises that need excellent virtualization performance, this makes Micron Enterprise PCIe SSD-based SAN a wise investment.
Database performance and memory capacity with the Intel Xeon processor E5-266...Principled Technologies
The Dell PowerEdge M620 offers 24 memory slots, 50 percent more than the 16 slots offered by the HP ProLiant BL460c Gen8, which enables the Dell solution to provide greater performance while delivering memory error protection. We found that the Dell PowerEdge M620 solution, built on the new Intel Xeon processor E5-2600v2 Series, delivered 182.2 percent more database performance and 92.0 percent faster response times than the previous version Intel Xeon E5-2640 processor-based HP ProLiant BL460c Gen 8 solution, while providing 12.5 percent more available memory and error protection. The additional memory capacity of the Dell solution allowed us to engage FRM technologies and still have more overall RAM capacity compared to the 16-slot HP server. The Dell PowerEdge M620 offered maximum memory capacity and protection with Fault Resilient Memory to keep your database workloads running strong and available for your business needs.
Minimizing licensing costs for enterprise applications is vital to organizations looking to keep costs down. When your applications use per-core licensing, choosing higher-performance servers with fewer cores dramatically reduces your software-related spending. The Dell PowerEdge M820 blade solution with Compellent storage could deliver up to $96,236 in savings as compared to a single HP ProLiant BL680c G7 solution, and if consolidating multiple workloads, could deliver even more savings in licensing costs when running Microsoft SQL Server in a virtualized scenario – all while maintaining or exceeding previous performance levels.
HP PolyServe Software for Microsoft SQL Serverwebhostingguy
The HP PolyServe Software for Microsoft SQL Server enables consolidation of multiple SQL Server instances onto fewer servers and centralized storage. It provides high availability, virtualization-like flexibility, scalable capacity allocation, and instance mobility. Key features include an adaptive SQL platform, consolidated data management, and high availability for mission-critical applications. It goes beyond consolidation and failovers to meet Microsoft's SQL Server Always On requirements, making it ideal for database consolidation.
VMmark 2.5.2 virtualization performance of the Dell Storage SC4020 arrayPrincipled Technologies
The Dell Storage SC4020 array paired with Dell PowerEdge R620 servers supported 30 tiles of the VMmark 2.5.2 virtualization benchmark for a total of 240 running virtual machines. The system achieved a score of 31.35 at 30 tiles, indicating it can handle multiple virtualized applications and hypervisor operations while maintaining strong performance. Testing showed the SC4020 provided consistent I/O operations per second around 43,000 and latency mostly under 4 milliseconds. This performance demonstrates the SC4020 is suitable for increasing virtualized workloads supported by solid-state drives without degrading storage performance.
The switching method you choose for your SBC environment can help determine performance and the experience that end-users have. We found that unifying switching with Cisco VM-FEX resulted in up to 29 percent lower latency than a solution using a traditional vSwitch when running a Citrix XenApp hosted shared desktop farm. Furthermore, the Cisco VM-FEX solution used up to 53 percent less CPU than the vSwitch solution did under extreme network conditions. In addition to these performance advantages, Cisco UCS Manager provides a central point of management and a simplified method to add vSphere hosts to the VM-FEX-enabled vSwitch, which can reduce management time and costs.
As our results show, switching to Cisco VM-FEX can provide your users with a more responsive environment.
Resource balancing comparison: VMware vSphere 6 vs. Red Hat Enterprise Virtua...Principled Technologies
Having ample resources to handle user requests is a necessity of modern virtualization solutions. Allocating and distributing those resources evenly, however, is imperative to the success of your business’s virtualized environment. In our tests, after powering on the other two servers in our three-node cluster and adding resource management features, VMware vSphere 6 improved performance by 183 percent over its baseline configuration of one active server and no resource management features. RHEV 3.5, in contrast, delivered only a 79 percent increase over its baseline. As you design your business’s infrastructure and applications, improvements such as those offered by VMware vSphere 6 DRS and Storage DRS can play a critical role by offering your users better application experiences. Optimized and modern resource management provided by VMware DRS can also help to lower your IT purchase and maintenance costs by reducing the number of servers necessary to run your applications.
Dell PowerEdge R920 and Microsoft SQL Server 2014 Migration and Benefits GuidePrincipled Technologies
The latest Dell PowerEdge R920 server is designed to provide highly scalable performance for large enterprises, with greater memory capacity, improved and expanded attached storage options, and processor architectures designed for high availability. Microsoft SQL Server 2014 is the perfect companion software to take advantage of the Dell PowerEdge R920’s impressive specifications. Upgrading has never looked more attractive, and with hardware/software upgrades must come data migration.
Migrating legacy database applications to the latest database technologies on newer Dell server platforms is a common task for businesses upgrading their hardware/software stack. As this guide shows, the process is straightforward and the cost benefits can be enormous. We calculated the savings attainable from multiple consolidation ratios, as well as how long it would take to pay off the replacement server. We found that a consolidation ratio of 13 to 1 could yield $531,725 in software savings, many times the cost of the replacement hardware itself. So not only will the business benefit from the massively-scalable current-generation Dell server technology paired with Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 running SQL Server 2014, but you can save money in the process.
VMmark virtualization performance of Micron Enterprise PCIe SSD-based SANPrincipled Technologies
The storage you use for your virtualization solution can be a significant factor in its performance and effectiveness. Two Dell PowerEdge R720 servers, paired with Micron Enterprise PCIe SSD-based SAN, ran 10 VMmark tiles for a total of 80 running VMs and achieved a score of 12.05@10 tiles, making it the top score running VMware ESXi 5.5 of the 32-core server configurations. For enterprises that need excellent virtualization performance, this makes Micron Enterprise PCIe SSD-based SAN a wise investment.
Database performance and memory capacity with the Intel Xeon processor E5-266...Principled Technologies
The Dell PowerEdge M620 offers 24 memory slots, 50 percent more than the 16 slots offered by the HP ProLiant BL460c Gen8, which enables the Dell solution to provide greater performance while delivering memory error protection. We found that the Dell PowerEdge M620 solution, built on the new Intel Xeon processor E5-2600v2 Series, delivered 182.2 percent more database performance and 92.0 percent faster response times than the previous version Intel Xeon E5-2640 processor-based HP ProLiant BL460c Gen 8 solution, while providing 12.5 percent more available memory and error protection. The additional memory capacity of the Dell solution allowed us to engage FRM technologies and still have more overall RAM capacity compared to the 16-slot HP server. The Dell PowerEdge M620 offered maximum memory capacity and protection with Fault Resilient Memory to keep your database workloads running strong and available for your business needs.
Minimizing licensing costs for enterprise applications is vital to organizations looking to keep costs down. When your applications use per-core licensing, choosing higher-performance servers with fewer cores dramatically reduces your software-related spending. The Dell PowerEdge M820 blade solution with Compellent storage could deliver up to $96,236 in savings as compared to a single HP ProLiant BL680c G7 solution, and if consolidating multiple workloads, could deliver even more savings in licensing costs when running Microsoft SQL Server in a virtualized scenario – all while maintaining or exceeding previous performance levels.
HP PolyServe Software for Microsoft SQL Serverwebhostingguy
The HP PolyServe Software for Microsoft SQL Server enables consolidation of multiple SQL Server instances onto fewer servers and centralized storage. It provides high availability, virtualization-like flexibility, scalable capacity allocation, and instance mobility. Key features include an adaptive SQL platform, consolidated data management, and high availability for mission-critical applications. It goes beyond consolidation and failovers to meet Microsoft's SQL Server Always On requirements, making it ideal for database consolidation.
This document provides a step-by-step guide for configuring distributed data center virtualization using Windows Virtual Server 2005 R2, Sanbolic's Melio File System, and Microsoft Clustering Services. Key steps include installing required software, configuring a two-node Microsoft Clustering Services cluster, creating virtual machines and storage on a SAN, and configuring resources to allow active virtual machines to migrate across physical hosts while maintaining access to shared storage.
VMware vSphere 7 Update 2 offered greater VM density and increased availabili...Principled Technologies
vSphere not only supported more VMs than the container native virtualization approach in OpenShift, but it required less downtime and less hands-on admin time
Boosting virtualization performance with Intel SSD DC Series P3600 NVMe SSDs ...Principled Technologies
When it comes time to make your server purchase or if you’re looking for an easy way to boost performance of existing infrastructure, consider upgrading your server’s internal storage. As our hands-on tests with a Dell EMC PowerEdge R630 environment running VMware Virtual SAN proved, Intel SSD DC P3600 Series NVMe SSDs could increase virtualized mixed-workload performance by as much as 59.9 percent compared to SATA SSDs while allowing you to run a large additional number of VMs. When you improve performance for your virtualized workloads, your employees and customers will benefit. By increasing performance with Intel NVMe SSDs on your Dell EMC PowerEdge R630 servers, you can potentially slash wait times and do more work on your servers without having to expand your infrastructure with additional storage arrays, which can translate to happier users and a more efficient infrastructure.
1) VMware Virtual SAN 6.0 combined with Diablo Memory Channel Storage allows hosting large SQL Server databases in a single virtual machine without performance degradation.
2) Testing showed the combination could support over 100,000 I/O operations per second with latency under 1 millisecond, outperforming all-flash storage arrays which bottlenecked around 40,000 IOPS.
3) The combination provides unprecedented database performance, density, and cost savings by running databases alongside other workloads on a common converged infrastructure platform.
Virtualizing Microsoft SQL Server 2008 with Citrix XenServerwebhostingguy
This document summarizes a study comparing the performance of virtualizing Microsoft SQL Server 2008 with Citrix XenServer versus a physical server. Key findings include:
1. Virtualizing a single SQL Server instance with XenServer resulted in 7.6% overhead on average, compared to 36.4% for another vendor.
2. Virtualizing multiple SQL Server instances showed increasing performance benefits with XenServer over physical servers as more instances were added. XenServer outperformed physical servers and the other vendor in most tests with two or more instances.
3. XenServer performance scaled well with up to eight virtualized SQL Server instances, while the other vendor showed performance declines when scaling from four to eight instances.
4
Dell 3-2-1 Reference Configurations: High available and scalable performance ...Principled Technologies
Dell 3-2-1 Reference Configurations consisting of Dell PowerEdge R720 servers, Dell Force10 S4810P switches, and Dell EqualLogic PS6110XV storage provide a range of configuration options so that you can select the one that is right for your business needs. Additionally, each configuration is easily scalable to accommodate for business growth.
The 3-2-1 base configuration provides a robust solution for any business needing to support up to 500 users on multiple business applications. Our tests demonstrate this solution supporting 500 users per VM for four VMs including two database VMs, one email VM, and one collaboration application VM.
If the number of users you need to support exceeds the user count the base configuration provides, adding another Dell PowerEdge R720 server to make a 4-2-1 configuration can support up to 1,000 users on multiple business applications while maintaining high availability. Our tests demonstrate this solution supporting 1,000 users per VM in the same four VMs as the 3-2-1 solution. Additionally, these configurations are so easy to scale upward that you can complete the process of adding a server in a matter of two hours or less from start to finish.
If you require support for an even higher number of users, adding a server and storage array to the base configuration, to make a 4-2-2 configuration allows for up to 1,500 users on multiple business applications. Our tests demonstrated this when we ran 1,500 users against each of the four VMs. Better yet, adding a Dell EqualLogic PS6110XV storage array to an existing 4-2-1 configuration is a cinch, taking under 30 minutes start to finish.
All of these Dell Reference Configurations give your business the reliability of highly available hardware configurations, greatly reducing downtime resulting from any hardware malfunctions.
By choosing proven Dell architecture, you avoid the hassles of putting your infrastructure together piece by piece, reducing the potential for error and providing you with a sturdy solution that is easily scalable to fit your present and future needs.
Dell PowerEdge R920 running Oracle Database: Benefits of upgrading with NVMe ...Principled Technologies
Strong server performance is essential to companies running Oracle Database. The new Dell PowerEdge R920 provides strong performance in its base configuration with 24 SAS hard disks, but this performance gets an enormous boost when running the configuration containing NVMe Express Flash PCIe SSDs. In our testing, the upgraded configuration of the Dell PowerEdge R920 delivered 14.9 times the database performance of the base configuration. In addition, in testing the raw I/O throughput of the NVMe Express Flash PCIe SSDs, we saw as much as 192.8 times the IOPS as compared to the base configuration. Given that the storage subsystem is critical in servers and specifically database applications, the performance improvements offered by NVMe Express Flash PCIe SSDs can lead to great service improvements for your customers, making this upgrade a very wise investment.
Virtualization performance: VMware vSphere 5 vs. Red Hat Enterprise Virtualiz...Principled Technologies
Using a hypervisor that offers better resource management and scalability can deliver excellent virtual machine performance on your servers. In our testing, VMware vSphere 5 allowed our host’s virtual machines to outperform those running on RHEV 3 by over 28 percent in total OPM performance. Furthermore, VMware vSphere 5 performance continued to improve when going from 39 VMs to 42 VMs: Total performance for VMware vSphere 5 increased by 2.8 percent, whereas it decreased by 7.2 percent with RHEV 3.
With the capabilities and scalability that VMware vSphere 5 offers, you are able to utilize the full capacity of your servers with confidence and purchase fewer servers to handle workload spikes; this can translate to fewer racks in the data center, lower costs for your business, and more consistent overall application performance.
Reap better SQL Server OLTP performance with next-generation Dell EMC PowerEd...Principled Technologies
The document summarizes testing that compared the performance of new Dell EMC PowerEdge MX750c servers to current Dell EMC PowerEdge MX740c servers. The testing found that:
- A cluster of the new servers achieved 36.1% more SQL Server transaction processing work (orders per minute) than a cluster of the current servers, while also lowering application response time by 8%.
- With the same number of virtual machines, the new server cluster achieved 18.7% more transactions than the current cluster and an 18.4% lower response time.
- By adding one more virtual machine per new server, the new cluster achieved a 36.1% higher transaction rate than the current cluster
Virtual Solution for Microsoft SQL Serverwebhostingguy
This document describes a virtualization solution for running Microsoft SQL Server using VMware Infrastructure 3 and EMC Celerra IP Storage servers. The solution provides benefits like high availability, scalability, and maintaining performance. It ensures SQL Server environments remain available and can grow easily. Virtualizing SQL Server reduces complexity, improves flexibility and reliability of the infrastructure, and allows for simple disaster recovery and provisioning of new resources. The solution consists of VMware Infrastructure 3 for virtualization, EMC Celerra IP storage servers, Dell PowerEdge servers, and Microsoft SQL Server.
This document discusses virtualizing server infrastructure for SharePoint environments. It begins by outlining benefits of virtualization like reducing costs, consolidating servers, and optimizing investments. It then discusses specific SharePoint components that are good candidates for virtualization like web servers, query servers, and index servers. It provides guidelines on memory limitations and virtualizing development, test, and production environments. It also discusses virtualization software options from Microsoft and third parties and Microsoft licensing implications. Finally it shares some sample virtualized SharePoint environments.
Setting up a failover cluster on the Dell PowerEdge VRTX is a straightforward process. In very little time, you can deploy Dell PowerEdge VRTX with up to four M-series servers, switches, and storage in a redundant configuration using Microsoft Windows Server 2012 Hyper-V. By setting up a failover cluster on your compact Dell PowerEdge VRTX, you can maximize server uptime to keep your business moving.
Drive new initiatives with a powerful Dell EMC, Nutanix, and Toshiba solution...Principled Technologies
A Dell EMC XC Series cluster featuring Nutanix software and powered by Toshiba PX05S SAS SSDs delivered strong database performance with a blend of structured and unstructured data
VirtualCenter Database Maintenance: VirtualCenter 2.0.x and ...webhostingguy
This technical note discusses ways to maintain the VirtualCenter database for increased performance and manageability. It covers database backup and recovery, reducing database privileges, improving performance through purging old data and enabling automatic statistics, and upgrading SQL Server. The document provides guidance on installing VirtualCenter with SQL Server, including using supported versions, separating critical files onto separate drives, sizing the database, selecting the appropriate recovery model, avoiding the master database, setting up a new database, and creating a system DSN.
Dell Acceleration Appliance for Databases 2.0 and Microsoft SQL Server 2014: ...Principled Technologies
As this guide has shown, installing and configuring a Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 with SQL Server 2014 powered by the Dell Acceleration Appliance for Databases is a straightforward procedure. A key benefit from implementing DAAD 2.0 into your infrastructure is the ability to accelerate workloads without a complete storage area network redesign. This can be ideal for businesses that have snapshot and deduplication features within their software stack or are looking to improve database performance without investing in large storage solutions that may contain features they do not need. Consider DAAD 2.0 for your business—a storage acceleration solution that requires only 4U of rack space and can potentially give your database workloads a boost.
This document provides an overview of new features in SQL Server 2005, including SQLCLR which allows writing functions, procedures and triggers in .NET languages. It discusses how to install and debug SQLCLR assemblies, and create user-defined data types and aggregates that can extend the functionality of SQL Server. Key enhancements to T-SQL are also summarized, such as common table expressions, ranking commands, and exception handling.
Business-critical applications on VMware vSphere 6, VMware Virtual SAN, and V...Principled Technologies
The document summarizes performance testing of VMware vSphere 6, VMware Virtual SAN, and VMware NSX running business-critical applications. In single-site testing, the solution delivered over 189,000 IOPS and 5ms average read latency under heavy workload. In two-site testing, it live migrated all VMs between sites in under 9 minutes with no downtime or performance degradation for applications. The software-defined datacenter solution provided reliable performance and business continuity for critical workloads.
Deploy with confidence: VMware Cloud Foundation 5.1 on next gen Dell PowerEdg...Principled Technologies
A Principled Technologies deployment guide
Conclusion
Deploying VMware Cloud Foundation 5.1 on next gen Dell PowerEdge servers brings together critical virtualization capabilities and high-performing hardware infrastructure. Relying on our hands-on experience, this deployment guide offers a comprehensive roadmap that can guide your organization through the seamless integration of advanced VMware cloud solutions with the performance and reliability of Dell PowerEdge servers. In addition to the deployment efficiency, the Cloud Foundation 5.1 and PowerEdge solution delivered strong performance while running a MySQL database workload. By leveraging VMware Cloud Foundation 5.1 and PowerEdge servers, you could help your organization embrace cloud computing with confidence, potentially unlocking a new level of agility, scalability, and efficiency in your data center operations.
A company’s success depends on critical application performance and availability. Upgrades and patches can improve application efficiency and user experience, but making the necessary changes requires resource intensive environments to test updates before deploying them. What’s more, these applications need to continue accessing data even in the event of an on-premises crisis.
Our Dell EMC VMAX 250F and PowerEdge server solution supported test/dev environments and production database applications simultaneously without affecting the production applications’ performance. Storage latency for the VMAX 250F peaked at a millisecond in our testing while IOPS stayed within an acceptable range. The solution also kept data highly available with no downtime or performance drop when we initiated a lost host connection for the primary storage. Consider the Dell EMC VMAX 250F array for your datacenter to support the critical database applications that drive your company.
Upgrade your cloud infrastructure with Dell PowerEdge R760 servers and VMware...Principled Technologies
Compared to a cluster of PowerEdge R750 servers running VMware Cloud Foundation 4.5
Conclusion
If your company is struggling with underperforming infrastructure, upgrading to 16th Generation Dell PowerEdge servers running VCF 5.1 could be just what you need to handle more database throughput and reduce vSAN latencies. We found that a Dell PowerEdge R760 server cluster running VCF 5.1 processed over 78 percent more TPM and 79 percent more NOPM than a Dell PowerEdge R750 server cluster running VCF 4.5. It’s also worth noting that the PowerEdge R750 cluster bottlenecked on vSAN storage, with max write latency at 8.9ms. For reference, the PowerEdge R760 cluster clocked in at 3.8ms max write latency. This higher latency is due in part to the single disk group per host on the moderately configured PowerEdge R750 cluster, while the better-configured PowerEdge R760 cluster supported four disk groups per host. As an additional benefit to IT admins, we also found that the embedded VMware Aria Operation adapter provided useful infrastructure insights.
A Dell PowerEdge MX environment using OpenManage Enterprise and OpenManage En...Principled Technologies
Compared to a Cisco UCS-X environment using Intersight, the Dell environment streamlined making changes to VLANs and helped avoid interventions during scheduled firmware updates
Conclusion
We executed two management scenarios in a Dell PowerEdge MX environment with Dell OpenManage Enterprise and OpenManage Enterprise Modular and a Cisco UCS X-Series chassis environment with Cisco Intersight. We learned that the Dell solution’s single-part profile modification for performing VLAN updates was quicker and simpler than the Cisco solution’s two-part profile deployment, requiring 40 percent less time and two-thirds as many steps. We also compared the firmware updating process on the solutions. Being able to schedule these updates to occur automatically from the online Dell repository offered an advantage over having to manually execute the same tasks from the Cisco Intersight repositories. Namely, administrators do not need to take action during maintenance windows but can instead schedule them ahead of time. Saving time on routine tasks frees administrators to pursue innovation, and being able to avoid middle-of-the-night duties helps companies provide a better work experience for admins. Together, these advantages help make Dell PowerEdge MX servers a good candidate for companies considering upgrading the older Cisco UCS servers in their data centers.
This document provides a step-by-step guide for configuring distributed data center virtualization using Windows Virtual Server 2005 R2, Sanbolic's Melio File System, and Microsoft Clustering Services. Key steps include installing required software, configuring a two-node Microsoft Clustering Services cluster, creating virtual machines and storage on a SAN, and configuring resources to allow active virtual machines to migrate across physical hosts while maintaining access to shared storage.
VMware vSphere 7 Update 2 offered greater VM density and increased availabili...Principled Technologies
vSphere not only supported more VMs than the container native virtualization approach in OpenShift, but it required less downtime and less hands-on admin time
Boosting virtualization performance with Intel SSD DC Series P3600 NVMe SSDs ...Principled Technologies
When it comes time to make your server purchase or if you’re looking for an easy way to boost performance of existing infrastructure, consider upgrading your server’s internal storage. As our hands-on tests with a Dell EMC PowerEdge R630 environment running VMware Virtual SAN proved, Intel SSD DC P3600 Series NVMe SSDs could increase virtualized mixed-workload performance by as much as 59.9 percent compared to SATA SSDs while allowing you to run a large additional number of VMs. When you improve performance for your virtualized workloads, your employees and customers will benefit. By increasing performance with Intel NVMe SSDs on your Dell EMC PowerEdge R630 servers, you can potentially slash wait times and do more work on your servers without having to expand your infrastructure with additional storage arrays, which can translate to happier users and a more efficient infrastructure.
1) VMware Virtual SAN 6.0 combined with Diablo Memory Channel Storage allows hosting large SQL Server databases in a single virtual machine without performance degradation.
2) Testing showed the combination could support over 100,000 I/O operations per second with latency under 1 millisecond, outperforming all-flash storage arrays which bottlenecked around 40,000 IOPS.
3) The combination provides unprecedented database performance, density, and cost savings by running databases alongside other workloads on a common converged infrastructure platform.
Virtualizing Microsoft SQL Server 2008 with Citrix XenServerwebhostingguy
This document summarizes a study comparing the performance of virtualizing Microsoft SQL Server 2008 with Citrix XenServer versus a physical server. Key findings include:
1. Virtualizing a single SQL Server instance with XenServer resulted in 7.6% overhead on average, compared to 36.4% for another vendor.
2. Virtualizing multiple SQL Server instances showed increasing performance benefits with XenServer over physical servers as more instances were added. XenServer outperformed physical servers and the other vendor in most tests with two or more instances.
3. XenServer performance scaled well with up to eight virtualized SQL Server instances, while the other vendor showed performance declines when scaling from four to eight instances.
4
Dell 3-2-1 Reference Configurations: High available and scalable performance ...Principled Technologies
Dell 3-2-1 Reference Configurations consisting of Dell PowerEdge R720 servers, Dell Force10 S4810P switches, and Dell EqualLogic PS6110XV storage provide a range of configuration options so that you can select the one that is right for your business needs. Additionally, each configuration is easily scalable to accommodate for business growth.
The 3-2-1 base configuration provides a robust solution for any business needing to support up to 500 users on multiple business applications. Our tests demonstrate this solution supporting 500 users per VM for four VMs including two database VMs, one email VM, and one collaboration application VM.
If the number of users you need to support exceeds the user count the base configuration provides, adding another Dell PowerEdge R720 server to make a 4-2-1 configuration can support up to 1,000 users on multiple business applications while maintaining high availability. Our tests demonstrate this solution supporting 1,000 users per VM in the same four VMs as the 3-2-1 solution. Additionally, these configurations are so easy to scale upward that you can complete the process of adding a server in a matter of two hours or less from start to finish.
If you require support for an even higher number of users, adding a server and storage array to the base configuration, to make a 4-2-2 configuration allows for up to 1,500 users on multiple business applications. Our tests demonstrated this when we ran 1,500 users against each of the four VMs. Better yet, adding a Dell EqualLogic PS6110XV storage array to an existing 4-2-1 configuration is a cinch, taking under 30 minutes start to finish.
All of these Dell Reference Configurations give your business the reliability of highly available hardware configurations, greatly reducing downtime resulting from any hardware malfunctions.
By choosing proven Dell architecture, you avoid the hassles of putting your infrastructure together piece by piece, reducing the potential for error and providing you with a sturdy solution that is easily scalable to fit your present and future needs.
Dell PowerEdge R920 running Oracle Database: Benefits of upgrading with NVMe ...Principled Technologies
Strong server performance is essential to companies running Oracle Database. The new Dell PowerEdge R920 provides strong performance in its base configuration with 24 SAS hard disks, but this performance gets an enormous boost when running the configuration containing NVMe Express Flash PCIe SSDs. In our testing, the upgraded configuration of the Dell PowerEdge R920 delivered 14.9 times the database performance of the base configuration. In addition, in testing the raw I/O throughput of the NVMe Express Flash PCIe SSDs, we saw as much as 192.8 times the IOPS as compared to the base configuration. Given that the storage subsystem is critical in servers and specifically database applications, the performance improvements offered by NVMe Express Flash PCIe SSDs can lead to great service improvements for your customers, making this upgrade a very wise investment.
Virtualization performance: VMware vSphere 5 vs. Red Hat Enterprise Virtualiz...Principled Technologies
Using a hypervisor that offers better resource management and scalability can deliver excellent virtual machine performance on your servers. In our testing, VMware vSphere 5 allowed our host’s virtual machines to outperform those running on RHEV 3 by over 28 percent in total OPM performance. Furthermore, VMware vSphere 5 performance continued to improve when going from 39 VMs to 42 VMs: Total performance for VMware vSphere 5 increased by 2.8 percent, whereas it decreased by 7.2 percent with RHEV 3.
With the capabilities and scalability that VMware vSphere 5 offers, you are able to utilize the full capacity of your servers with confidence and purchase fewer servers to handle workload spikes; this can translate to fewer racks in the data center, lower costs for your business, and more consistent overall application performance.
Reap better SQL Server OLTP performance with next-generation Dell EMC PowerEd...Principled Technologies
The document summarizes testing that compared the performance of new Dell EMC PowerEdge MX750c servers to current Dell EMC PowerEdge MX740c servers. The testing found that:
- A cluster of the new servers achieved 36.1% more SQL Server transaction processing work (orders per minute) than a cluster of the current servers, while also lowering application response time by 8%.
- With the same number of virtual machines, the new server cluster achieved 18.7% more transactions than the current cluster and an 18.4% lower response time.
- By adding one more virtual machine per new server, the new cluster achieved a 36.1% higher transaction rate than the current cluster
Virtual Solution for Microsoft SQL Serverwebhostingguy
This document describes a virtualization solution for running Microsoft SQL Server using VMware Infrastructure 3 and EMC Celerra IP Storage servers. The solution provides benefits like high availability, scalability, and maintaining performance. It ensures SQL Server environments remain available and can grow easily. Virtualizing SQL Server reduces complexity, improves flexibility and reliability of the infrastructure, and allows for simple disaster recovery and provisioning of new resources. The solution consists of VMware Infrastructure 3 for virtualization, EMC Celerra IP storage servers, Dell PowerEdge servers, and Microsoft SQL Server.
This document discusses virtualizing server infrastructure for SharePoint environments. It begins by outlining benefits of virtualization like reducing costs, consolidating servers, and optimizing investments. It then discusses specific SharePoint components that are good candidates for virtualization like web servers, query servers, and index servers. It provides guidelines on memory limitations and virtualizing development, test, and production environments. It also discusses virtualization software options from Microsoft and third parties and Microsoft licensing implications. Finally it shares some sample virtualized SharePoint environments.
Setting up a failover cluster on the Dell PowerEdge VRTX is a straightforward process. In very little time, you can deploy Dell PowerEdge VRTX with up to four M-series servers, switches, and storage in a redundant configuration using Microsoft Windows Server 2012 Hyper-V. By setting up a failover cluster on your compact Dell PowerEdge VRTX, you can maximize server uptime to keep your business moving.
Drive new initiatives with a powerful Dell EMC, Nutanix, and Toshiba solution...Principled Technologies
A Dell EMC XC Series cluster featuring Nutanix software and powered by Toshiba PX05S SAS SSDs delivered strong database performance with a blend of structured and unstructured data
VirtualCenter Database Maintenance: VirtualCenter 2.0.x and ...webhostingguy
This technical note discusses ways to maintain the VirtualCenter database for increased performance and manageability. It covers database backup and recovery, reducing database privileges, improving performance through purging old data and enabling automatic statistics, and upgrading SQL Server. The document provides guidance on installing VirtualCenter with SQL Server, including using supported versions, separating critical files onto separate drives, sizing the database, selecting the appropriate recovery model, avoiding the master database, setting up a new database, and creating a system DSN.
Dell Acceleration Appliance for Databases 2.0 and Microsoft SQL Server 2014: ...Principled Technologies
As this guide has shown, installing and configuring a Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 with SQL Server 2014 powered by the Dell Acceleration Appliance for Databases is a straightforward procedure. A key benefit from implementing DAAD 2.0 into your infrastructure is the ability to accelerate workloads without a complete storage area network redesign. This can be ideal for businesses that have snapshot and deduplication features within their software stack or are looking to improve database performance without investing in large storage solutions that may contain features they do not need. Consider DAAD 2.0 for your business—a storage acceleration solution that requires only 4U of rack space and can potentially give your database workloads a boost.
This document provides an overview of new features in SQL Server 2005, including SQLCLR which allows writing functions, procedures and triggers in .NET languages. It discusses how to install and debug SQLCLR assemblies, and create user-defined data types and aggregates that can extend the functionality of SQL Server. Key enhancements to T-SQL are also summarized, such as common table expressions, ranking commands, and exception handling.
Business-critical applications on VMware vSphere 6, VMware Virtual SAN, and V...Principled Technologies
The document summarizes performance testing of VMware vSphere 6, VMware Virtual SAN, and VMware NSX running business-critical applications. In single-site testing, the solution delivered over 189,000 IOPS and 5ms average read latency under heavy workload. In two-site testing, it live migrated all VMs between sites in under 9 minutes with no downtime or performance degradation for applications. The software-defined datacenter solution provided reliable performance and business continuity for critical workloads.
Deploy with confidence: VMware Cloud Foundation 5.1 on next gen Dell PowerEdg...Principled Technologies
A Principled Technologies deployment guide
Conclusion
Deploying VMware Cloud Foundation 5.1 on next gen Dell PowerEdge servers brings together critical virtualization capabilities and high-performing hardware infrastructure. Relying on our hands-on experience, this deployment guide offers a comprehensive roadmap that can guide your organization through the seamless integration of advanced VMware cloud solutions with the performance and reliability of Dell PowerEdge servers. In addition to the deployment efficiency, the Cloud Foundation 5.1 and PowerEdge solution delivered strong performance while running a MySQL database workload. By leveraging VMware Cloud Foundation 5.1 and PowerEdge servers, you could help your organization embrace cloud computing with confidence, potentially unlocking a new level of agility, scalability, and efficiency in your data center operations.
A company’s success depends on critical application performance and availability. Upgrades and patches can improve application efficiency and user experience, but making the necessary changes requires resource intensive environments to test updates before deploying them. What’s more, these applications need to continue accessing data even in the event of an on-premises crisis.
Our Dell EMC VMAX 250F and PowerEdge server solution supported test/dev environments and production database applications simultaneously without affecting the production applications’ performance. Storage latency for the VMAX 250F peaked at a millisecond in our testing while IOPS stayed within an acceptable range. The solution also kept data highly available with no downtime or performance drop when we initiated a lost host connection for the primary storage. Consider the Dell EMC VMAX 250F array for your datacenter to support the critical database applications that drive your company.
Upgrade your cloud infrastructure with Dell PowerEdge R760 servers and VMware...Principled Technologies
Compared to a cluster of PowerEdge R750 servers running VMware Cloud Foundation 4.5
Conclusion
If your company is struggling with underperforming infrastructure, upgrading to 16th Generation Dell PowerEdge servers running VCF 5.1 could be just what you need to handle more database throughput and reduce vSAN latencies. We found that a Dell PowerEdge R760 server cluster running VCF 5.1 processed over 78 percent more TPM and 79 percent more NOPM than a Dell PowerEdge R750 server cluster running VCF 4.5. It’s also worth noting that the PowerEdge R750 cluster bottlenecked on vSAN storage, with max write latency at 8.9ms. For reference, the PowerEdge R760 cluster clocked in at 3.8ms max write latency. This higher latency is due in part to the single disk group per host on the moderately configured PowerEdge R750 cluster, while the better-configured PowerEdge R760 cluster supported four disk groups per host. As an additional benefit to IT admins, we also found that the embedded VMware Aria Operation adapter provided useful infrastructure insights.
A Dell PowerEdge MX environment using OpenManage Enterprise and OpenManage En...Principled Technologies
Compared to a Cisco UCS-X environment using Intersight, the Dell environment streamlined making changes to VLANs and helped avoid interventions during scheduled firmware updates
Conclusion
We executed two management scenarios in a Dell PowerEdge MX environment with Dell OpenManage Enterprise and OpenManage Enterprise Modular and a Cisco UCS X-Series chassis environment with Cisco Intersight. We learned that the Dell solution’s single-part profile modification for performing VLAN updates was quicker and simpler than the Cisco solution’s two-part profile deployment, requiring 40 percent less time and two-thirds as many steps. We also compared the firmware updating process on the solutions. Being able to schedule these updates to occur automatically from the online Dell repository offered an advantage over having to manually execute the same tasks from the Cisco Intersight repositories. Namely, administrators do not need to take action during maintenance windows but can instead schedule them ahead of time. Saving time on routine tasks frees administrators to pursue innovation, and being able to avoid middle-of-the-night duties helps companies provide a better work experience for admins. Together, these advantages help make Dell PowerEdge MX servers a good candidate for companies considering upgrading the older Cisco UCS servers in their data centers.
White paper: IBM FlashSystems in VMware EnvironmentsthinkASG
Drive performance in VMware environments with IBM FlashSystem. IBM flash storage delivers extreme, scalable performance for virtualized infrastructure.
Slow performance and unavailable critical applications can impinge a company’s progress. You can apply patches and updates to improve application quality and user experience, but these changes need to be tested in resource-intensive environments before deployment. Keeping these applications accessing data is vital, too, as on-premises events can put availability at risk.
Our Dell EMC VMAX 250F and PowerEdge server solution supported test/dev environments and production database applications simultaneously without affecting the production applications’ performance. As we added VMs designed for test/dev environments, the production workload maintained an acceptable level of IOPS and achieved an average storage latency of less than a millisecond. The solution also kept data highly available with no downtime and no performance drop when we initiated a lost host connection for the primary storage. To run critical database applications of your company, consider the Dell EMC VMAX 250F for your datacenter.
The document summarizes testing of a Dell EMC VMAX 250F all-flash storage array and Dell EMC PowerEdge servers to support both production and test/development Oracle Database 12c workloads. Key findings include:
1) The solution maintained low latency of less than 1 millisecond even when adding 7 test/dev database snapshots to the production workload.
2) The production workload saw less than 2% degradation in IOPS despite increasing overall storage IOPS by adding test/dev workloads.
3) Using SRDF/Metro replication, the solution provided uninterrupted access to data with no downtime or performance drop when one array was unavailable, ensuring high availability.
Administrators can spend a great deal of time deploying and managing computing resources, especially when dealing with ROBO environments. The Dell PowerEdge VRTX, powered by the Intel Xeon processor E5-2400 v2 product family and running Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2, gives administrators centralized management tools to help them provide time saving benefits and integrated toolsets.
In our hands-on testing, we found that the Dell PowerEdge VRTX greatly simplified deployment through an easy, wizard-based setup of Microsoft Windows Server Failover Clusters across server nodes with the Dell OpenManage Cluster Configurator. It also provided versatile hardware resource reassignment through a shared PCIe bus and efficient centralized management through CMC and scripting. Finally, we found that the Dell System Update Utility worked seamlessly with Microsoft Cluster-Aware Updating to update server nodes while keeping the failover cluster online and minimizing downtime. These advantages make the Dell PowerEdge VRTX an attractive choice for those who seek to reduce the management overhead of their ROBO environments.
Benchmarking a Scalable and Highly Available Architecture for Virtual DesktopsDataCore Software
This paper reports on a configuration for Virtual Desktops (VDs) which reduces the total hardware cost to approximately $32.41 per desktop, including the storage infrastructure. This number is achieved using a configuration with dual node, cross-mirrored, High Availability storage. In comparison to previously published reports, which tout the storage infrastructure costs alone of VDI at from fifty to several hundred dollars per virtual machine, the significance of the data becomes self evident. In this report, storage hardware costs become inconsequential.
The document summarizes testing of Symantec NetBackup 7.6 and a competitor's solution for backing up virtual environments of increasing size, from 100 to 1,000 VMs. It found that NetBackup with the NetBackup Integrated Appliance provided backups that were 66.8% faster than the competitor's solution for backing up 1,000 VMs using SAN transport. NetBackup also offered capabilities like Replication Director and Accelerator that the competitor did not support. The testing environment used VMware vSphere and NetApp storage arrays to host the VMs.
Blue Medora Oracle Enterprise Manager (EM12c) Plug-in for VMware vSphereBlue Medora
Overview presentation for the Blue Medora Oracle Enterprise Manager 12c Plug-in for VMware vSphere. The plugin provides Oracle EM12c-based monitoring, management, and provisioning capabilities or vSphere based Datacenters, Clusters, ESX Hosts, and Virtual Machines.
Version 8, Released in December 2013 introduced a new EM12c 'VMware Management' target that extends EM12c's native DBaaS and MWaaS capabilities to VMware based infrastructures
Symantec NetBackup 7.6 benchmark comparison: Data protection in a large-scale...Principled Technologies
The footprint of a VM can grow quickly in an enterprise environment and large-scale VM deployments in the thousands are common. As this number of deployed systems grows, so does the risk of failure. Critical failures can become unavoidable and offering data protection from a backup solution promotes business continuity. Elongated protection windows requiring multiple jobs of different types can create resource contention with production environments and may require valuable IT admin time, so a finite window for system backups can have plenty of importance.
In our hands-on SAN backup testing, the Symantec NetBackup Integrated Appliance running NetBackup 7.6 offered application protection to 1,000 VMs in 66.8 percent less time than Competitor “E” did. In addition, the Symantec NetBackup Integrated Appliance with NetBackup 7.6 created backup images that offered granular recovery without additional steps. These time and effort savings can scale as your VM footprint grows, allowing you to execute both system protection and user-friendly, simplified recovery.
Streamline operations with new and updated VMware vSphere 8.0 features on 16t...Principled Technologies
By using the latest software and Dell PowerEdge servers in your VMware vSphere environment, you can provide your data center administrators with new or updated tools that simplify routine tasks in both initial host setup and ongoing monitoring. In our exploration of the latest features in vSphere 8.0 Lifecycle Manager, we found that vSphere 8.0 on latest-gen Dell PowerEdge servers offers advantages compared to the previous generation, which may make an infrastructure update worth your while. By introducing vSphere Configuration Profiles and providing simpler image updates to vSphere clusters, VMware vSphere 8.0 on latest-generation Dell PowerEdge servers can help streamline operations for your administrative staff.
This document discusses the Dell EMC VxRAIL appliance, which is a hyper-converged infrastructure solution based on VMware's software-defined storage. It is a preconfigured appliance that can be easily deployed and managed. The appliance uses VMware Virtual SAN for the storage software and can be scaled out by adding additional nodes in a cluster. It offers various configurations to meet different use cases with options for all-flash or hybrid nodes. The document highlights key features of Virtual SAN like quality of service, management tools, deduplication and compression. It also outlines the simplified lifecycle management through automated configuration and non-disruptive scaling of the appliance cluster.
VMworld 2013: Maximize Database Performance in Your Software-Defined Data CenterVMworld
VMworld 2013
Mark Achtemichuk, VMware
Michael Webster, VMware
Learn more about VMworld and register at http://www.vmworld.com/index.jspa?src=socmed-vmworld-slideshare
Upgrading to Windows Server 2019 on Dell EMC PowerEdge servers: A simple proc...Principled Technologies
Using Dell EMC PowerEdge R740xd servers with Intel Xeon Scalable processors, we upgraded from Windows Server 2016 and saw data compression ratios of up to 9.8:1 thanks to new Storage Spaces Direct features
Virtualization is an increasingly critical part of data center computing. Selecting a server that excels at virtualization makes good business sense. Two Lenovo ThinkServer RD630 servers, paired with Dot Hill AssuredSAN Pro5720 tiered storage, ran 10 VMmark tiles for a total of 80 running VMs and achieved a score of 11.17@10 tiles, placing it in the top 8 percent of the 32-core server configurations. This makes the Lenovo ThinkServer RD630 an excellent choice for any enterprise that uses virtualization.
SQL Server 2016 database performance on the Dell EMC PowerEdge FC630 QLogic 1...Principled Technologies
Upgrading the hardware running your SQL Server to a space-efficient modular Dell EMC modern environment can help your company achieve a great deal of database work in a small amount of space. With the Dell Express Flash technology, adding a caching solution such as Samsung AutoCache can make the environment even more efficient.
In the PT labs, we ran a mixed database workload on six Dell EMC PowerEdge FC630 servers, powered by Intel Xeon E5-2667 processors, in three PowerEdge FX2 enclosures. The solution included the QLogic QLE2692 16Gb FC adapter with StorFusion Technology, Dell EMC Storage SC9000 all-flash storage, and Dell EMC PowerEdge Express Flash NVMe Performance PCIe SSDs.
With no caching solution, the 36 SQL Server 2016 VMs on the six servers achieved a total of 431,839 orders per minute while an Oracle workload ran on 12 VMs. When we added a caching solution to accelerate the SQL database volumes, the performance across the 36 SQL Server 2016 VMs doubled to 871,580. These numbers show the power of server-side caching to alleviate pressure on the storage array allowing you to get even more out of the Dell EMC modern environment.
Similar to VMmark 2.5.2 virtualization performance of the Dell EqualLogic PS6210XS storage array (20)
Help skilled workers succeed with Dell Latitude 7030 and 7230 Rugged Extreme ...Principled Technologies
Instead of equipping consumer-grade tablets with rugged cases
Conclusion
In our hands-on testing, the Dell Latitude 7030 and 7230 Rugged Extreme Tablets showed that they are better equipped to help skilled workers than consumer-grade Apple iPad Pro and Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 tablets in multiple ways. They provide more built-in capabilities and features than the consumer-grade tablets we tested. And, while they were more expensive than the rugged-case fortified consumer-grade options we tested, their rugged claims were more than skin deep.
In our performance and durability tests, the Dell Latitude 7030 and 7230 Rugged Extreme Tablets performed better in demanding manufacturing, logistics, and field service environments than consumer-grade tablets with rugged cases. Both Rugged Extreme Tablets, with their greater thermal range, suffered less performance degradation in extreme temperatures, never failed and were merely scuffed after 26 hard drops, survived a 10 minute drenching with no ill effects, and were easier to view in direct sunlight than Apple iPad Pro and Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 tablets.
Bring ideas to life with the HP Z2 G9 Tower Workstation - InfographicPrincipled Technologies
We compared CPU performance and noise output of an HP Z2 G9 Tower Workstation in High Performance Mode to a similarly configured Dell Precision 3660 Tower Workstation in its out-of-box performance mode
Investing in GenAI: Cost‑benefit analysis of Dell on‑premises deployments vs....Principled Technologies
Conclusion
Diving into the world of GenAI has the potential to yield a great many benefits for your organization, but it first requires consideration for how best to implement those GenAI workloads. Whether your AI goals are to create a chatbot for online visitors, generate marketing materials, aid troubleshooting, or something else, implementing an AI solution requires careful planning and decision-making. A major decision is whether to host GenAI in the cloud or keep your data on premises. Traditional on-premises solutions can provide superior security and control, a substantial concern when dealing with large amounts of potentially sensitive data. But will supporting a GenAI solution on site be a drain on an organization’s IT budget?
In our research, we found that the value proposition is just the opposite: Hosting GenAI workloads on premises, either in a traditional Dell solution or using a managed Dell APEX pay-per-use solution, could significantly lower your GenAI costs over 3 years compared to hosting these workloads in the cloud. In fact, we found that a comparable AWS SageMaker solution would cost up to 3.8 times as much and an Azure ML solution would cost up to 3.6 times as much as GenAI on a Dell APEX pay-per-use solution. These results show that organizations looking to implement GenAI and reap the business benefits to come can find many advantages in an on-premises Dell solution, whether they opt to purchase and manage it themselves or choose a subscription-based Dell APEX pay-per-use solution. Choosing an on-premises Dell solution could save your organization significantly over hosting GenAI in the cloud, while giving you control over the security and privacy of your data as well as any updates and changes to the environment, and while ensuring your environment is managed consistently.
Workstations powered by Intel can play a vital role in CPU-intensive AI devel...Principled Technologies
In three AI development workflows, Intel processor-powered workstations delivered strong performance, without using their GPUs, making them a good choice for this part of the AI process
Conclusion
We executed three AI development workflows on tower workstations and mobile workstations from three vendors, with each workflow utilizing only the Intel CPU cores, and found that these platforms were suitable for carrying out various AI tasks. For two of the workflows, we learned that completing the tasks on the tower workstations took roughly half as much time as on the mobile workstations. This supports the idea that the tower workstations would be appropriate for a development environment for more complex models with a greater volume of data and that the mobile workstations would be well-suited for data scientists fine-tuning simpler models. In the third workflow, we explored tower workstation performance with different precision levels and learned that using 16-bit floating point precision allowed the workstations to execute the workflow in less time and also reduced memory usage dramatically. For all three AI workflows we executed, we consider the time the workstations needed to complete the tasks to be acceptable, and believe that these workstations can be appropriate, cost-effective choices for these kinds of activities.
Enable security features with no impact to OLTP performance with Dell PowerEd...Principled Technologies
Get comparable online transaction processing (OLTP) performance with or without enabling AMD Secure Memory Encryption and AMD Secure Encrypted Virtualization - Encrypted State
Conclusion
You’ve likely already implemented many security measures for your servers, which may include physical security for the data center, hardware-level security, and software-level security. With the cost of data breaches high and still growing, however, wise IT teams will consider what additional security measures they may be able to implement.
AMD SME and SEV-ES are technologies that are already available within your AMD processor-powered 16th Generation Dell PowerEdge servers—and in our testing, we saw that they can offer extra layers of security without affecting performance. We compared the online transaction processing performance of a Dell PowerEdge R7625 server, powered by AMD EPYC 9274F processors, with and without these two security features enabled. We found that enabling AMD Secure Memory Encryption and Secure Encrypted Virtualization-Encrypted State did not impact performance at all.
If your team is assessing areas where you might be able to enhance security—without paying a large performance cost—consider enabling AME SME and AMD SEV-ES in your Dell PowerEdge servers.
Improving energy efficiency in the data center: Endure higher temperatures wi...Principled Technologies
In high-temperature test scenarios, a Dell PowerEdge HS5620 server continued running an intensive workload without component warnings or failures, while a Supermicro SYS‑621C-TN12R server failed
Conclusion: Remain resilient in high temperatures with the Dell PowerEdge HS5620 to help increase efficiency
Increasing your data center’s temperature can help your organization make strides in energy efficiency and cooling cost savings. With servers that can hold up to these higher everyday temperatures—as well as high temperatures due to unforeseen circumstances—your business can continue to deliver the performance your apps and clients require.
When we ran an intensive floating-point workload on a Dell PowerEdge HS5620 and a Supermicro SYS-621CTN12R in three scenario types simulating typical operations at 25°C, a fan failure, and an HVAC malfunction, the Dell server experienced no component warnings or failures. In contrast, the Supermicro server experienced warnings in all three scenario types and experienced component failures in the latter two tests, rendering the system unusable. When we inspected and analyzed each system, we found that the Dell PowerEdge HS5620 server’s motherboard layout, fans, and chassis offered cooling design advantages.
For businesses aiming to meet sustainability goals by running hotter data centers, as well as those concerned with server cooling design, the Dell PowerEdge HS5620 is a strong contender to take on higher temperatures during day-to-day operations and unexpected malfunctions.
Dell APEX Cloud Platform for Red Hat OpenShift: An easily deployable and powe...Principled Technologies
The 4th Generation Intel Xeon Scalable processor‑powered solution deployed in less than two hours and ran a Kubernetes container-based generative AI workload effectively
Dell APEX Cloud Platform for Red Hat OpenShift: An easily deployable and powe...Principled Technologies
The 4th Generation Intel Xeon Scalable processor‑powered solution deployed in less than two hours and ran a generative AI workload effectively
Conclusion
The appeal of incorporating GenAI into your organization’s operations is likely great. Getting started with an efficient solution for your next LLM workload or application can seem daunting because of the changing hardware and software landscape, but Dell APEX Cloud Platform for Red Hat OpenShift powered by 4th Gen Intel Xeon Scalable processors could provide the solution you need. We started with a Dell Validated Design as a reference, and then went on to modify the deployment as necessary for our Llama 2 workload. The Dell APEX Cloud Platform for Red Hat OpenShift solution worked well for our LLM, and by using this deployment guide in conjunction with numerous Dell documents and some flexibility, you could be well on your way to innovating your next GenAI breakthrough.
Upgrade your cloud infrastructure with Dell PowerEdge R760 servers and VMware...Principled Technologies
Compared to a cluster of PowerEdge R750 servers running VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF)
For organizations running clusters of moderately configured, older Dell PowerEdge servers with a previous version of VCF, upgrading to better-configured modern servers can provide a significant performance boost and more.
Upgrade your cloud infrastructure with Dell PowerEdge R760 servers and VMware...Principled Technologies
Compared to a cluster of PowerEdge R750 servers running VMware Cloud Foundation 4.5
If your company is struggling with underperforming infrastructure, upgrading to 16th Generation Dell PowerEdge servers running VCF 5.1 could be just what you need to handle more database throughput and reduce vSAN latencies. As an additional benefit to IT admins, we also found that the embedded VMware Aria Operation adapter provided useful infrastructure insights.
Realize 2.1X the performance with 20% less power with AMD EPYC processor-back...Principled Technologies
Three AMD EPYC processor-based two-processor solutions outshined comparable Intel Xeon Scalable processor-based solutions by handling more Redis workload transactions and requests while consuming less power
Conclusion
Performance and energy efficiency are significant factors in processor selection for servers running data-intensive workloads, such as Redis. We compared the Redis performance and energy consumption of a server cluster in three AMD EPYC two-processor configurations against that of a server cluster in two Intel Xeon Scalable two-processor configurations. In each of our three test scenarios, the server cluster backed by AMD EPYC processors outperformed the server cluster backed by Intel Xeon Scalable processors. In addition, one of the AMD EPYC processor-based clusters consumed 20 percent less power than its Intel Xeon Scalable processor-based counterpart. Combining these measurements gave us power efficiency metrics that demonstrate how valuable AMD EPYC processor-based servers could be—you could see better performance per watt with these AMD EPYC processor-based server clusters and potentially get more from your Redis or other data intensive applications and workloads while reducing data center power costs.
Improve performance and gain room to grow by easily migrating to a modern Ope...Principled Technologies
We deployed this modern environment, then migrated database VMs from legacy servers and saw performance improvements that support consolidation
Conclusion
If your organization’s transactional databases are running on gear that is several years old, you have much to gain by upgrading to modern servers with new processors and networking components and an OpenShift environment. In our testing, a modern OpenShift environment with a cluster of three Dell PowerEdge R7615 servers with 4th Generation AMD EPYC processors and high-speed 100Gb Broadcom NICs outperformed a legacy environment with MySQL VMs running on a cluster of three Dell PowerEdge R7515 servers with 3rd Generation AMD EPYC processors and 25Gb Broadcom NICs. We also easily migrated a VM from the legacy environment to the modern environment, with only a few steps required to set up and less than ten minutes of hands-on time. The performance advantage of the modern servers would allow a company to reduce the number of servers necessary to perform a given amount of database work, thus lowering operational expenditures such as power and cooling and IT staff time for maintenance. The high-speed 100Gb Broadcom NICs in this solution also give companies better network performance and networking capacity to grow as they embrace emerging technologies such as AI that put great demands on networks.
Boost PC performance: How more available memory can improve productivityPrincipled Technologies
With more memory available, system performance of three Dell devices increased, which can translate to a better user experience
Conclusion
When your system has plenty of RAM to meet your needs, you can efficiently access the applications and data you need to finish projects and to-do lists without sacrificing time and focus. Our test results show that with more memory available, three Dell PCs delivered better performance and took less time to complete the Procyon Office Productivity benchmark. These advantages translate to users being able to complete workflows more quickly and multitask more easily. Whether you need the mobility of the Latitude 5440, the creative capabilities of the Precision 3470, or the high performance of the OptiPlex Tower Plus 7010, configuring your system with more RAM can help keep processes running smoothly, enabling you to do more without compromising performance.
Based on our research using publicly available materials, it appears that Dell supports nine of the ten PC security features we investigated, HP supports six of them, and Lenovo supports three features.
Increase security, sustainability, and efficiency with robust Dell server man...Principled Technologies
Compared to the Supermicro management portfolio
Conclusion
Choosing a vendor for server purchases is about more than just the hardware platform. Decision-makers must also consider more long-term concerns, including system/data security, energy efficiency, and ease of management. These concerns make the systems management tools a vendor offers as important as the hardware.
We investigated the features and capabilities of server management tools from Dell and Supermicro, comparing Dell iDRAC9 against Supermicro IPMI for embedded server management and Dell OpenManage Enterprise and CloudIQ against Supermicro Server Manager for one-to-many device and console management and monitoring. We found that the Dell management tools provided more comprehensive security, sustainability, and management/monitoring features and capabilities than Supermicro servers did. In addition, Dell tools automated more tasks to ease server management, resulting in significant time savings for administrators versus having to do the same tasks manually with Supermicro tools.
When making a server purchase, a vendor’s associated management products are critical to protect data, support a more sustainable environment, and to ease the maintenance of systems. Our tests and research showed that the Dell management portfolio for PowerEdge servers offered more features to help organizations meet these goals than the comparable Supermicro management products.
Increase security, sustainability, and efficiency with robust Dell server man...Principled Technologies
Compared to the Supermicro management portfolio
Conclusion
Choosing a vendor for server purchases is about more than just the hardware platform. Decision-makers must also consider more long-term concerns, including system/data security, energy efficiency, and ease of management. These concerns make the systems management tools a vendor offers as important as the hardware.
We investigated the features and capabilities of server management tools from Dell and Supermicro, comparing Dell iDRAC9 against Supermicro IPMI for embedded server management and Dell OpenManage Enterprise and CloudIQ against Supermicro Server Manager for one-to-many device and console management and monitoring. We found that the Dell management tools provided more comprehensive security, sustainability, and management/monitoring features and capabilities than Supermicro servers did. In addition, Dell tools automated more tasks to ease server management, resulting in significant time savings for administrators versus having to do the same tasks manually with Supermicro tools.
When making a server purchase, a vendor’s associated management products are critical to protect data, support a more sustainable environment, and to ease the maintenance of systems. Our tests and research showed that the Dell management portfolio for PowerEdge servers offered more features to help organizations meet these goals than the comparable Supermicro management products.
Scale up your storage with higher-performing Dell APEX Block Storage for AWS ...Principled Technologies
In our tests, Dell APEX Block Storage for AWS outperformed similarly configured solutions from Vendor A, achieving more IOPS, better throughput, and more consistent performance on both NVMe-supported configurations and configurations backed by Elastic Block Store (EBS) alone.
Dell APEX Block Storage for AWS supports a full NVMe backed configuration, but Vendor A doesn’t—its solution uses EBS for storage capacity and NVMe as an extended read cache—which means APEX Block Storage for AWS can deliver faster storage performance.
Scale up your storage with higher-performing Dell APEX Block Storage for AWSPrincipled Technologies
Dell APEX Block Storage for AWS offered stronger and more consistent storage performance for better business agility than a Vendor A solution
Conclusion
Enterprises desiring the flexibility and convenience of the cloud for their block storage workloads can find fast-performing solutions with the enterprise storage features they’re used to in on-premises infrastructure by selecting Dell APEX Block Storage for AWS.
Our hands-on tests showed that compared to the Vendor A solution, Dell APEX Block Storage for AWS offered stronger, more consistent storage performance in both NVMe-supported and EBS-backed configurations. Using NVMe-supported configurations, Dell APEX Block Storage for AWS achieved 4.7x the random read IOPS and 5.1x the throughput on sequential read operations per node vs. Vendor A. In our EBS-backed comparison, Dell APEX Block Storage for AWS offered 2.2x the throughput per node on sequential read operations vs. Vendor A.
Plus, the ability to scale beyond three nodes—up to 512 storage nodes with capacity of up to 8 PBs—enables Dell APEX Block Storage for AWS to help ensure performance and capacity as your team plans for the future.
Get in and stay in the productivity zone with the HP Z2 G9 Tower WorkstationPrincipled Technologies
We compared CPU performance and noise output of an HP Z2 G9 Tower Workstation in High Performance Mode to Dell Precision 3660 and 5860 tower workstations in optimized performance modes
Conclusion
HP Z2 G9 Tower Workstation users can change the BIOS settings to dial in the performance mode that best suits their needs: High Performance Mode, Performance Mode, or Quiet Mode. In good
news for both creative and technical professionals, we found that an Intel Core i9-13900 processor-powered HP Z2 G9 Tower Workstation set to High Performance mode received higher CPU-based benchmark scores than both a similarly configured Dell Precision 3660 and a Dell Precision 5860 equipped with an Intel Xeon w5-2455x processor. Plus, the HP Z2 G9 Tower Workstation was quieter while running CPU-intensive Cinebench 2024 and SPECapc for Solidworks 2022 workloads than both Dell Precision tower workstations. This means HP Z2 G9 Tower Workstation users who prize performance over everything else can do so without sacrificing a quiet workspace.
Open up new possibilities with higher transactional database performance from...Principled Technologies
In our PostgreSQL tests, R7i instances boosted performance over R6i instances with previous-gen processors
If you use the open-source PostgreSQL database to run your critical business operations, you have many cloud options from which to choose. While many of these instances can do the job, some can deliver stronger performance, which can mean getting a greater return on your cloud investment.
We conducted hands-on testing with the HammerDB TPROC-C benchmark to see how the PostgreSQL performance of Amazon EC2 R7i instances, enabled by 4th Gen Intel Xeon Scalable processors, stacked up to that of R6i instances with previous-generation processors. We learned that small, medium-sized, and large R7i instances with the newer processors delivered better OLTP performance, with improvements as high as 13.8 percent. By choosing the R7i instances, your organization has the potential to support more users, deliver a better experience to those users, and even lower your cloud operating expenditures by requiring fewer instances to get the job done.
Unlocking Productivity: Leveraging the Potential of Copilot in Microsoft 365, a presentation by Christoforos Vlachos, Senior Solutions Manager – Modern Workplace, Uni Systems
Pushing the limits of ePRTC: 100ns holdover for 100 daysAdtran
At WSTS 2024, Alon Stern explored the topic of parametric holdover and explained how recent research findings can be implemented in real-world PNT networks to achieve 100 nanoseconds of accuracy for up to 100 days.
Dr. Sean Tan, Head of Data Science, Changi Airport Group
Discover how Changi Airport Group (CAG) leverages graph technologies and generative AI to revolutionize their search capabilities. This session delves into the unique search needs of CAG’s diverse passengers and customers, showcasing how graph data structures enhance the accuracy and relevance of AI-generated search results, mitigating the risk of “hallucinations” and improving the overall customer journey.
How to Get CNIC Information System with Paksim Ga.pptxdanishmna97
Pakdata Cf is a groundbreaking system designed to streamline and facilitate access to CNIC information. This innovative platform leverages advanced technology to provide users with efficient and secure access to their CNIC details.
Climate Impact of Software Testing at Nordic Testing DaysKari Kakkonen
My slides at Nordic Testing Days 6.6.2024
Climate impact / sustainability of software testing discussed on the talk. ICT and testing must carry their part of global responsibility to help with the climat warming. We can minimize the carbon footprint but we can also have a carbon handprint, a positive impact on the climate. Quality characteristics can be added with sustainability, and then measured continuously. Test environments can be used less, and in smaller scale and on demand. Test techniques can be used in optimizing or minimizing number of tests. Test automation can be used to speed up testing.
In his public lecture, Christian Timmerer provides insights into the fascinating history of video streaming, starting from its humble beginnings before YouTube to the groundbreaking technologies that now dominate platforms like Netflix and ORF ON. Timmerer also presents provocative contributions of his own that have significantly influenced the industry. He concludes by looking at future challenges and invites the audience to join in a discussion.
AI 101: An Introduction to the Basics and Impact of Artificial IntelligenceIndexBug
Imagine a world where machines not only perform tasks but also learn, adapt, and make decisions. This is the promise of Artificial Intelligence (AI), a technology that's not just enhancing our lives but revolutionizing entire industries.
Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1DianaGray10
This session provides introduction to UiPath Communication Mining, importance and platform overview. You will acquire a good understand of the phases in Communication Mining as we go over the platform with you. Topics covered:
• Communication Mining Overview
• Why is it important?
• How can it help today’s business and the benefits
• Phases in Communication Mining
• Demo on Platform overview
• Q/A
GraphSummit Singapore | The Art of the Possible with Graph - Q2 2024Neo4j
Neha Bajwa, Vice President of Product Marketing, Neo4j
Join us as we explore breakthrough innovations enabled by interconnected data and AI. Discover firsthand how organizations use relationships in data to uncover contextual insights and solve our most pressing challenges – from optimizing supply chains, detecting fraud, and improving customer experiences to accelerating drug discoveries.
For the full video of this presentation, please visit: https://www.edge-ai-vision.com/2024/06/building-and-scaling-ai-applications-with-the-nx-ai-manager-a-presentation-from-network-optix/
Robin van Emden, Senior Director of Data Science at Network Optix, presents the “Building and Scaling AI Applications with the Nx AI Manager,” tutorial at the May 2024 Embedded Vision Summit.
In this presentation, van Emden covers the basics of scaling edge AI solutions using the Nx tool kit. He emphasizes the process of developing AI models and deploying them globally. He also showcases the conversion of AI models and the creation of effective edge AI pipelines, with a focus on pre-processing, model conversion, selecting the appropriate inference engine for the target hardware and post-processing.
van Emden shows how Nx can simplify the developer’s life and facilitate a rapid transition from concept to production-ready applications.He provides valuable insights into developing scalable and efficient edge AI solutions, with a strong focus on practical implementation.
Let's Integrate MuleSoft RPA, COMPOSER, APM with AWS IDP along with Slackshyamraj55
Discover the seamless integration of RPA (Robotic Process Automation), COMPOSER, and APM with AWS IDP enhanced with Slack notifications. Explore how these technologies converge to streamline workflows, optimize performance, and ensure secure access, all while leveraging the power of AWS IDP and real-time communication via Slack notifications.
Infrastructure Challenges in Scaling RAG with Custom AI modelsZilliz
Building Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems with open-source and custom AI models is a complex task. This talk explores the challenges in productionizing RAG systems, including retrieval performance, response synthesis, and evaluation. We’ll discuss how to leverage open-source models like text embeddings, language models, and custom fine-tuned models to enhance RAG performance. Additionally, we’ll cover how BentoML can help orchestrate and scale these AI components efficiently, ensuring seamless deployment and management of RAG systems in the cloud.
Goodbye Windows 11: Make Way for Nitrux Linux 3.5.0!SOFTTECHHUB
As the digital landscape continually evolves, operating systems play a critical role in shaping user experiences and productivity. The launch of Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 marks a significant milestone, offering a robust alternative to traditional systems such as Windows 11. This article delves into the essence of Nitrux Linux 3.5.0, exploring its unique features, advantages, and how it stands as a compelling choice for both casual users and tech enthusiasts.
Goodbye Windows 11: Make Way for Nitrux Linux 3.5.0!
VMmark 2.5.2 virtualization performance of the Dell EqualLogic PS6210XS storage array
1. NOVEMBER 2014
A PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES TEST REPORT
Commissioned by Dell
VMMARK 2.5.2 VIRTUALIZATION PERFORMANCE OF THE
DELL EQUALLOGIC PS6210XS STORAGE ARRAY
Many modern data centers are using virtual machines (VMs) to consolidate
physical servers to increase operational efficiency. As multi-core processors become
more commonplace, underutilization of physical servers has become an increasing
problem. Without virtualization, it is very difficult to fully utilize the power of a modern
server. In a virtualized environment, a software layer lets users create multiple
independent VMs on a single physical server, taking full advantage of the hardware
resources. The storage solution, which is just as important as the servers and
processors, should be flexible to accommodate the demands on real-world applications
and operations that virtualization brings to the table.
In all virtualized environments, storage performance can deteriorate due to a
phenomenon called the input/output (I/O) blender effect. Multiple VMs send their I/O
streams to a hypervisor for processing. Unfortunately, if you are using more than one
type of workload, I/O profiles are no longer consistent. This randomization of I/O
workload profiles, which can occur with all virtualization platforms, renders prior
workload optimizations ineffective, which can increase latency, or response time.
Because the performance requirements of storage in a completely virtualized
environment differ from those in a physical or only partially virtualized environment, it
is important to use a benchmark designed with these differences in mind, such as
VMware VMmark 2.5.2. VMmark incorporates a variety of platform-level workloads
2. A Principled Technologies test report 2VMmark 2.5.2 virtualization performance of the Dell EqualLogic
PS6210XS storage array
such as vMotion® and Storage vMotion® in addition to executing diverse workloads on a
collection of virtual machines. VMmark expresses scores in terms of tiles; a tile consists
of eight VMs that include database servers, Web servers, mail servers, as well as
standby servers.
In the Principled Technologies labs, the Dell EqualLogic PS6210XS array, paired
with a cluster of Dell PowerEdge M620 servers, supported 12 VMmark tiles for a total of
96 running VMs, and achieved a score of 14.80@12 tiles. This score indicates that the
Dell EqualLogic PS6210XS array can simultaneously handle multiple virtualized
applications and hypervisor operations while maintaining a strong level of performance,
making it an excellent choice for small to medium enterprise customers who want to
take advantage of the benefits that vitalization has to offer.
WHAT WE TESTED
Dell EqualLogic PS6210XS 10GbE iSCSI storage array paired with Dell PowerEdge M620 servers
The Dell EqualLogic PS6210XS is a hybrid storage solution that combines SSD
speed and HDD capacity within one array. It uses a combination of 7 SSDs and 17 10K
SAS HDDs with a raw capacity of up to 26TB per array. According to Dell, it is ideal for
VDI deployments, important databases, and other mixed workloads.
To learn more about the EqualLogic PS6210XS, visit
www.dell.com/us/business/p/equallogic-ps6210-series/pd.
As our goal was to discover the capabilities of the storage, we used multiple Dell
PowerEdge M620 servers in a cluster and split the workload responsibilities among the
servers. We found that with four M620 servers, we reached saturation on the storage
before performance bottlenecked on the servers.
VMmark 2.5.2
We selected VMmark 2.5.2 to measure the performance of the Dell EqualLogic
PS6210XS array. To compare platforms for virtualization, users need meaningful and
accurate metrics. Benchmarks developed to measure performance in non-virtualized
environments work by pushing one or more of the underlying hardware resources to
saturation. They don’t help you understand how virtual environments supporting
multiple simultaneous workloads can scale.
Some multi-workload server consolidation benchmarks, such as VMware
VMmark 1.1, measure single-host performance in virtualized environments. However,
typical server usage is evolving as technological advances enable easier virtualization of
bursty and heavy workloads, dynamic virtual machine relocation, dynamic datastore
relocation, and the automation of many provisioning and administrative tasks across
large-scale multi-host environments. Now, much of the stress on CPU, network, disk,
and memory subsystems is generated by the underlying infrastructure operations.
3. A Principled Technologies test report 3VMmark 2.5.2 virtualization performance of the Dell EqualLogic
PS6210XS storage array
Application performance also depends on effectively balancing load across multiple
hosts. To be useful in this environment, a benchmark needs to look at both user-centric
application performance and overall platform performance.
VMware VMmark 2.5.2, which has become an industry standard, meets these
criteria. In addition to using this unique benchmark approach, VMware maintains very
strict standards for execution and publication.
VMWARE + DELL EQUALLOGIC STORAGE = INTEGRATION
Until recently, only basic storage protocols were available to integrate storage
area networks (SANs) and virtualization platforms. Lack of integration between the
hypervisor and the underlying storage infrastructure prevented virtualized servers from
taking full advantage of the data protection and performance features of enterprise-
class storage.
Thanks to VMware vSphere Storage APIs (VAAI), this is no longer the case. Dell
EqualLogic PS Series Internet SCSI (iSCSI) SAN arrays are compatible with VAAI, and as
such all of their capabilities are transparently integrated into the VMware Infrastructure
environment.
Dell’s Virtual Storage Manager (VSM) makes managing the Dell EqualLogic
PS6210XS array a simple and straightforward experience using tools that many IT
administrators are already familiar with and use every day such as VMware vCenter and
vSphere Web Client. Because VSM fully supports vSphere Storage APIs for Storage
Awareness (VASA), it allows administrators to centralize the management of storage
groups and assist in the creation, cloning, replication, configuration, and management of
datastores using a graphical user interface through VMware vCenter.
EASE OF MANAGEMENT
Dell EqualLogic SAN HeadQuarters (SAN HQ) provides tools for administrators to
keep a high-level view of the storage system, while providing the flexibility to make
granular changes as needed.1
Figure 1 illustrates using SAN HQ to manage the SAN and
to monitor it for any issues.
1
For more information on Dell EqualLogic SAN HQ, see
www.dell.com/downloads/global/products/pvaul/en/equallogic-san-headquarters2.0.pdf
4. A Principled Technologies test report 4VMmark 2.5.2 virtualization performance of the Dell EqualLogic
PS6210XS storage array
Figure 1: Monitoring
the SAN using
EqualLogic SAN HQ.
OUR TESTING
VMmark measures the performance and scalability of real-world applications
running in virtualized environments. It is designed to measure virtual datacenter
performance accurately and reliably using predefined tiles, and it is used to compare the
performance of different hardware and virtualization configurations. To successfully
support a tile, acceptable QoS levels must be met, and scores are given based on the
number of operations or transactions the multiple applications are able to complete
during the test.
A VMmark tile is composed of the following:
A virtual Microsoft Exchange Server 2007 with 1,000 heavy profile users
Two Olio virtual machines (Olio Web and Olio Database) that simulate a Web
2.0 application focused and social networking and events
Four DVD Store Version 2 (DS2) virtual machines (three DS2 Web servers and
one DS2 database) that simulate an E-commerce application
One virtual Windows Server 2003 that serves as a standby machine
In addition to running the virtualized applications, VMmark also performs the
following tasks during a test:
Virtual machine cloning and deployment
Dynamic virtual machine relocation using vMotion
Dynamic Storage Relocation using Storage vMotion
Automated virtual machine load balancing
5. A Principled Technologies test report 5VMmark 2.5.2 virtualization performance of the Dell EqualLogic
PS6210XS storage array
To carry out the VMmark testing, we downloaded the benchmark from
www.vmware.com/products/vmmark/. We followed the test directions in the VMware
VMmark Benchmarking Guide (VMmark_Benchmarking_Guide_2.5.2.pdf), included with
the download of VMmark 2.5.2 made publicly available on February 12, 2014. We used
the guide’s instructions to build the mail server, standby, and deploy template VMs
from scratch. For the Oliodb, OlioWeb, DS2DB, and DS2Web VMs, we used the VMmark
prebuilt templates.
Learn more about VMmark at
www.vmware.com/products/vmmark/overview.html.
ANALYZING THE RESULTS
As Figure 2 shows, the EqualLogic 6210XS array offered consistent operations
per second throughout the run, averaging 21,727 IOPS. VMmark provided a persistent
load on the storage, and as Figure 2 shows, the storage was able to handle it well.
Figure 2: I/O operations
per second during the
VMmark run.
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
0:00 0:15 0:30 0:45 1:00 1:15 1:30 1:45 2:00
Time (hours:minutes)
IOPS
In addition to consistent level of IOPS, the EqualLogic 6210XS array
demonstrated acceptably low latencies, averaging around 5 ms through the test run
with occasional spikes during large groups of VM migrations. Thanks to write caching
from the SSDs as well as data tiering between the SSDs and HDDs in the hybrid array,
applications have much shorter wait times for retrieving data than they would in a
purely HDD array.
For a detailed look at our hardware configuration, see Appendix A. See
Appendix B for our test bed diagram and Appendix C for detailed VMmark 2.5.2 results.
6. A Principled Technologies test report 6VMmark 2.5.2 virtualization performance of the Dell EqualLogic
PS6210XS storage array
CONCLUSION
Virtualization is a critical part of data center computing. For your virtualization
solution to succeed, it is essential that you have a storage platform capable of delivering
the performance and capacity needed for a virtualized environment in a cost effective
way. The Dell EqualLogic PS6210XS array, paired with a cluster of Dell PowerEdge M620
servers, ran 12 VMmark tiles for a total of 96 running VMs, and achieved a score of
14.80@12. This performance, along with its value and ease of management, make the
Dell EqualLogic PS6210XS array an excellent investment.
7. A Principled Technologies test report 7VMmark 2.5.2 virtualization performance of the Dell EqualLogic
PS6210XS storage array
APPENDIX A – STORAGE DISCLOSURE AND SYSTEM CONFIGURATION
Figure 4 presents detailed configuration information about the servers we used in testing.
System
Dell PowerEdge M620
(servers under test)
Dell PowerEdge R620
(virtual client hosts)
Enclosure /chassis
Blade enclosure/chassis
Dell PowerEdge M1000e Blade
Enclosure with 2x MXL 10/40Gbe and
4x Force 10 XML 10/40GbE switch
N/A
General
Number of processor packages 2 2
Number of cores per processor 8 12
Number of hardware threads per
core
2 2
CPU
Vendor Intel® Intel
Name Xeon® Xeon
Model number E5-2680 E5-2695 v2
Socket type LGA2011 LGA2011
Core frequency (GHz) 2.70 2.40
Bus frequency 8.0 GT/s 8.0 GT/s
L1 cache 32 KB + 32 KB 32 KB + 32 KB
L2 cache 256 KB (per core) 256 KB (per core)
L3 cache 20 MB 30 MB
Platform
Vendor and model Dell PowerEdge M620 Dell PowerEdge R620
BIOS name and version Dell 2.2.7 Dell 2.2.2
BIOS settings Default Default
Memory module(s)
Total RAM in system (GB) 256 384
Vendor and model number Hynix® HMT42GR7MFR4C-PB Hynix HMT42GR7MFR4C-PB
Type PC3-12800R PC3-12800R
Speed (MHz) 1,600 1,600
Speed running in the system (MHz) 1,600 1,600
Size (GB) 16 16
Number of RAM module(s) 16 24
Rank Dual Dual
OS/hypervisor
Name VMware ESXi 5.5.0 VMware ESXi 5.5.0
Build number 1881737 1881737
File system VMFS VMFS
Language English English
RAID controller
Vendor and model number PERC H310 Mini PERC H710P Mini
8. A Principled Technologies test report 8VMmark 2.5.2 virtualization performance of the Dell EqualLogic
PS6210XS storage array
System
Dell PowerEdge M620
(servers under test)
Dell PowerEdge R620
(virtual client hosts)
Hard drives
Vendor and model number Dell MBF2600RC Dell MBF2600RC
Number of drives 2 2
Size (GB) 600 600
Type SAS SAS
Network adapter
Vendor and model number
Broadcom® NetXtreme® II BCM57810
10GB
Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM57800
10GB
Number of ports 2 2
Type Integrated Integrated
Ethernet adapter B
Vendor and model number Intel 82599EB 10GB N/A
Number of ports 2 N/A
Type Mezzanine card N/A
Ethernet adapter C
Vendor and model number Intel 82599EB 10GB N/A
Number of ports 2 N/A
Type Mezzanine card N/A
Figure 4: System configuration information for our test servers.
Figure 5 provides configuration information about the Dell EqualLogic PS6210XS array we used in our tests.
Storage array Dell EqualLogic PS6210XS
Number of storage shelves 1 x 24 disks enclosure
Number of storage controllers 2
Firmware revision V7.0.4
Disk model number 7 x LB806M
Disk size (GB) 800
Disk type SAS SSD
Disk model number 17 x HUC101212CSS600
Disk size (TB) 1.2
Disk type HUC101212CSS600
Figure 5: Detailed configuration information for the storage arrays.
9. A Principled Technologies test report 9VMmark 2.5.2 virtualization performance of the Dell EqualLogic
PS6210XS storage array
APPENDIX B – TEST BED CONFIGURATION
Figure 6: Configuration of our test bed.
10. A Principled Technologies test report 10VMmark 2.5.2 virtualization performance of the Dell EqualLogic
PS6210XS storage array
APPENDIX C – VMMARK 2.5.2 DETAILED RESULTS
VMware® VMmark® V2.5.2 Results
Vendor and Hardware Platform: Dell
PowerEdge M620
Virtualization Platform: VMware ESXi 5.5.0
Update 1 Build 1881737
VMware vCenter Server 5.5.0 Build 1750787
VMmark V2.5.2 Score =
14.80 @ 12 Tiles
Number of Hosts: 4 Uniform Hosts [yes/no]: yes
Total sockets/cores/threads in test:
8/64/128
Tested By: Principled Technologies Test Date: [11-09-2014]
Performance Section
Performance
Configuration Section
Configuration
Notes Section
Notes for Workload
Performance
mailserver olio dvdstoreA dvdstoreB dvdstoreC
TILE_0 Actual Ratio QoS Actual Ratio QoS Actual Ratio QoS Actual Ratio QoS Actual Ratio QoS GM
p0 328.40 0.99 173.00 4787.82 1.03 63.59 3026.97 1.38 113.49 2456.43 1.62 127.11 1865.20 1.76 131.63 1.32
p1 324.98 0.98 234.97 4789.07 1.03 57.28 3575.25 1.63 73.84 2861.47 1.88 80.88 2034.62 1.92 84.80 1.43
p2 324.77 0.98 272.75 4766.25 1.03 60.80 3592.93 1.63 73.40 2969.80 1.96 80.76 2171.00 2.05 83.22 1.46
TILE_1 Actual Ratio QoS Actual Ratio QoS Actual Ratio QoS Actual Ratio QoS Actual Ratio QoS GM
p0 329.05 1.00 183.97 4784.50 1.03 54.78 3376.47 1.54 113.17 2357.97 1.55 126.72 1743.65 1.65 138.01 1.32
p1 328.18 0.99 252.65 4778.32 1.03 54.50 4025.25 1.83 73.58 2898.07 1.91 80.94 2073.07 1.96 85.00 1.48
p2 328.12 0.99 276.25 4755.93 1.02 58.97 4049.10 1.84 71.69 3146.20 2.07 76.68 2299.78 2.17 82.92 1.53
TILE_2 Actual Ratio QoS Actual Ratio QoS Actual Ratio QoS Actual Ratio QoS Actual Ratio QoS GM
p0 326.80 0.99 186.60 4774.05 1.03 54.02 3351.80 1.52 114.95 2361.32 1.55 128.84 1683.72 1.59 133.89 1.31
p1 329.40 1.00 259.77 4779.88 1.03 57.67 4006.60 1.82 73.08 3009.50 1.98 78.69 2193.65 2.07 81.63 1.50
p2 328.70 1.00 289.68 4772.15 1.03 61.46 3948.47 1.80 75.05 2963.40 1.95 80.54 2267.60 2.14 85.55 1.50
TILE_3 Actual Ratio QoS Actual Ratio QoS Actual Ratio QoS Actual Ratio QoS Actual Ratio QoS GM
p0 326.38 0.99 171.97 4785.05 1.03 52.78 3452.10 1.57 104.87 2454.50 1.62 115.90 1735.67 1.64 125.37 1.34
p1 325.98 0.99 227.85 4775.00 1.03 56.34 4198.43 1.91 64.89 3275.82 2.16 69.90 2428.50 2.30 72.08 1.57
p2 331.88 1.00 265.93 4757.93 1.03 60.76 4090.72 1.86 70.33 2941.88 1.94 78.28 2209.30 2.09 82.80 1.51
TILE_4 Actual Ratio QoS Actual Ratio QoS Actual Ratio QoS Actual Ratio QoS Actual Ratio QoS GM
p0 325.95 0.99 208.30 4781.07 1.03 53.68 3376.75 1.54 109.14 2508.72 1.65 118.37 1837.33 1.74 119.86 1.35
11. A Principled Technologies test report 11VMmark 2.5.2 virtualization performance of the Dell EqualLogic
PS6210XS storage array
p1 326.40 0.99 273.55 4797.60 1.03 57.27 4156.18 1.89 66.28 3123.70 2.06 72.47 2353.28 2.22 77.32 1.55
p2 323.50 0.98 307.23 4777.93 1.03 60.64 4035.78 1.84 71.39 2933.55 1.93 76.92 2047.60 1.94 85.34 1.47
TILE_5 Actual Ratio QoS Actual Ratio QoS Actual Ratio QoS Actual Ratio QoS Actual Ratio QoS GM
p0 330.60 1.00 190.68 4778.90 1.03 53.67 3580.40 1.63 100.06 2724.25 1.79 109.48 1992.17 1.88 111.79 1.41
p1 328.32 0.99 246.72 4778.98 1.03 55.57 4244.95 1.93 63.85 3075.30 2.03 69.52 2279.00 2.15 75.78 1.54
p2 324.85 0.98 272.50 4775.32 1.03 59.63 4040.22 1.84 72.58 2918.45 1.92 78.49 2111.57 2.00 81.65 1.48
TILE_6 Actual Ratio QoS Actual Ratio QoS Actual Ratio QoS Actual Ratio QoS Actual Ratio QoS GM
p0 326.95 0.99 220.95 4771.80 1.03 53.52 3644.32 1.66 97.78 2698.15 1.78 107.26 1938.28 1.83 115.17 1.41
p1 330.43 1.00 290.85 4795.02 1.03 56.82 4225.70 1.92 63.41 3065.45 2.02 68.43 2269.70 2.15 74.09 1.54
p2 323.75 0.98 308.90 4759.52 1.03 77.15 4006.35 1.82 73.75 2982.57 1.96 81.11 2145.07 2.03 86.94 1.49
TILE_7 Actual Ratio QoS Actual Ratio QoS Actual Ratio QoS Actual Ratio QoS Actual Ratio QoS GM
p0 324.43 0.98 183.12 4798.23 1.03 53.15 3580.12 1.63 102.67 2597.22 1.71 116.74 1870.45 1.77 121.63 1.38
p1 326.55 0.99 234.50 4783.12 1.03 57.18 4151.77 1.89 66.36 3005.93 1.98 71.80 2168.88 2.05 73.27 1.51
p2 328.50 0.99 271.25 4781.52 1.03 60.15 4035.38 1.83 72.81 3002.88 1.98 79.25 2286.65 2.16 82.78 1.52
TILE_8 Actual Ratio QoS Actual Ratio QoS Actual Ratio QoS Actual Ratio QoS Actual Ratio QoS GM
p0 327.18 0.99 204.62 4770.43 1.03 53.73 3792.75 1.72 86.49 2830.28 1.86 93.32 2015.97 1.91 102.59 1.44
p1 328.40 0.99 253.68 4778.27 1.03 55.41 4161.20 1.89 66.51 3127.88 2.06 71.42 2281.65 2.16 75.51 1.54
p2 326.45 0.99 277.05 4795.48 1.03 59.76 4006.05 1.82 74.20 2844.95 1.87 82.97 2126.20 2.01 87.86 1.48
TILE_9 Actual Ratio QoS Actual Ratio QoS Actual Ratio QoS Actual Ratio QoS Actual Ratio QoS GM
p0 328.38 0.99 195.10 4781.10 1.03 53.54 3802.95 1.73 85.41 2861.28 1.88 89.95 2137.68 2.02 87.46 1.46
p1 329.27 1.00 267.57 4770.05 1.03 55.06 4225.55 1.92 63.94 3159.72 2.08 70.32 2428.20 2.29 71.74 1.57
p2 323.38 0.98 289.00 4762.38 1.03 58.85 4068.45 1.85 70.80 2958.47 1.95 75.59 2120.50 2.00 80.71 1.49
TILE_10 Actual Ratio QoS Actual Ratio QoS Actual Ratio QoS Actual Ratio QoS Actual Ratio QoS GM
p0 321.50 0.97 192.45 4795.65 1.03 52.79 3686.97 1.68 94.28 2816.30 1.85 103.11 2076.12 1.96 104.38 1.44
p1 326.98 0.99 256.62 4787.00 1.03 55.94 4119.45 1.87 68.23 2978.47 1.96 74.18 2230.03 2.11 79.33 1.51
p2 332.15 1.01 282.02 4778.23 1.03 60.18 3947.72 1.80 75.04 2847.62 1.88 81.27 2060.72 1.95 82.97 1.47
TILE_11 Actual Ratio QoS Actual Ratio QoS Actual Ratio QoS Actual Ratio QoS Actual Ratio QoS GM
p0 326.45 0.99 181.85 4781.55 1.03 52.47 3957.97 1.80 80.80 2935.80 1.93 89.84 2223.25 2.10 95.31 1.49
p1 324.12 0.98 225.50 4771.43 1.03 54.46 4204.10 1.91 63.45 3100.00 2.04 65.35 2230.28 2.11 68.67 1.53
p2 329.68 1.00 261.93 4775.20 1.03 57.66 4136.25 1.88 67.45 3123.88 2.06 71.55 2293.47 2.17 74.04 1.54
p0_score: 16.67
p1_score: 18.25
p2_score: 17.93
Infrastructure_Operations_Scores: vmotion svmotion deploy
12. A Principled Technologies test report 12VMmark 2.5.2 virtualization performance of the Dell EqualLogic
PS6210XS storage array
Completed_Ops_PerHour 35.00 20.00 10.00
Avg_Seconds_To_Complete 22.03 58.86 351.60
Failures 0.00 0.00 0.00
Ratio 2.19 2.22 2.50
Number_Of_Threads 2 2 2
Summary Run_Is_Compliant Turbo_Setting:0
Number_Of_Compliance_Issues(0)* Median_Phase(p2)
Unreviewed_VMmark2_Applications_Score 17.93
Unreviewed_VMmark2_Infrastructure_Score 2.30
Unreviewed_VMmark2_Score 14.80
Configuration
Virtualization Software
Hypervisor Vendor,
Product, Version, and Build /
Availability Date (MM-DD-YYYY)
VMware ESXi 5.5.0 Update 1 Build 1881737 / 06-10-2014
Datacenter Management Software Vendor,
Product, Version, and Build /
Availability Date (MM-DD-YYYY)
VMware vCenter Server 5.5.0 Build 1750787 / 04-19-2014
Supplemental Software None
Servers
Quantity 4
Server Manufacturer and Model Dell PowerEdge M620
Processor Vendor and Model Intel Xeon E5-2680
Processor Speed (GHz) 2.7
Total Sockets/Total Cores/Total Threads 2 Sockets / 16 Cores / 32 Threads
Primary Cache 32 KB I + 32 KB D on chip per core
Secondary Cache 256KB I+D on chip per core
13. A Principled Technologies test report 13VMmark 2.5.2 virtualization performance of the Dell EqualLogic
PS6210XS storage array
Other Cache 20MB I+D on chip per core
BIOS Version 2.2.7
Memory Size (in GB, Number of DIMMs) 256, 16 DIMMs
Memory Type and Speed 16GB DIMMs 2Rx4 DDR3-1600MHz Registered ECC
Disk Subsystem Type iSCSI SAN
Number of Disk Controllers 1
Disk Controller
Vendors and Models
Dell PERC H310
Number of Host Bus Adapters None
Host Bus Adapter
Vendors and Models
None
Number of Network Controllers 2
Network Controller
Vendors and Models
Broadcom® 10Gbps dual-port NetXtreme® II BCM57810
adapter, 10Gbps dual-port Intel 82599EB adapter
Other Hardware Dell PowerEdge M1000e Blade Enclosure
Other Software
The following drivers were installed as part of the Dell-
customized image for ESXi 5.5:
tg3 - 3.133d.v55.1, bnx2 - 2.2.3t.v55.7, bnx2x - 1.78.28.v55.2,
cnic - 1.78.12.v55.6, cnic-register - 1.78.1.v55.7, bnx2fc -
1.78.16.v55.4, bnx2i - 2.78.11.v55.4, qlnativefc - 1.1.7.0 -
1OEM.550.0.0.1198610, qla4xxx - 634.55.20.0-1vmw, qlcnic -
5.5.164, qlge - v3.00.00.57, igb - 4.2.16.8, ixgbe - 3.18.7iov,
lpfc - 10.0.575.8-1OEM.550.0.0.1198611, elxnet - 10.0.575.7-
10EM-550.0.0.1198611, be2iscsi - 4.6.261.0, mpt2sas -
16.00.01.00.1vmw
Hardware Availability Date (MM-DD-YYYY) 01-21-2014
Software Availability Date (MM-DD-YYYY) 06-10-2014
Network
Network Switch
Vendors and Models
4 x Dell Networking MXL 10/40GbE blade switches
Network Speed 10Gbps for all traffic
Storage
Array Vendors, Models,
and Firmware Versions
Dell EqualLogic PS6210XS, Firmware version V7.0.4
Fibre Channel Switch
Vendors and Models
None
Disk Space Used 3,532.6 GB
14. A Principled Technologies test report 14VMmark 2.5.2 virtualization performance of the Dell EqualLogic
PS6210XS storage array
Array Cache Size 16 GB
Total Number of Physical Disks Used 24
Total Number of Enclosures/Pods/Shelves Used 1
Number of Physical Disks Used per Enclosure/Pod/Shelf 24
Total Number of Storage Groups Used 1
Number of LUNs Used 10
LUN Size and Number of Disks Per LUN Details in section Storage Notes
RAID Type Details in section Storage Notes
Number of Members
per RAID Set
Details in section Storage Notes
Disk Vendors, Models, and Speeds
7 x SanDisk LB806M, 800GB SSD
17 x HGST HUC101212CSS600, 1.2TB 10k RPM SAS
Datacenter Management Server
System Model Dell PowerEdge M620
Processor Vendor
and Model
Intel Xeon E5-2660
Processor Speed (GHz) 2.2 GHz
Total Sockets/Total Cores/Total Threads 2 Sockets / 16 Cores / 32 Threads
Memory 32 GB
Network Controller(s)
Vendors and Models
Broadcom® 10Gbps dual-port NetXtreme® II BCM57810 adapter, 10Gbps
dual-port Intel 82599EB adapter
Operating System, Version,
Bitness, and Service Pack
Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise 64-bit (prime client)
VMware ESXi 5.5.0 Update 1 Build 1881737 (virtual client hosts)
Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise 64-bit (virtual client)
Other Hardware None
Other Software None
Clients
Total Number of Clients / Total
Physical Clients / Total Virtual
Client Hosts
13 / 1 / 4
System Model(s) Dell PowerEdge R620
Processor Vendor(s)
and Model(s)
Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2
Processor Speed(s) (GHz) 2.4
15. A Principled Technologies test report 15VMmark 2.5.2 virtualization performance of the Dell EqualLogic
PS6210XS storage array
Total Sockets/Total Cores/Total
Threads
2 Sockets / 12 Cores / 24 Threads
Memory per Physical Client 32 GB (prime client), 64 GB (virtual client hosts)
Network Controller(s)
Vendors and Models
Broadcom® 10Gbps dual-port NetXtreme® II BCM57810 adapter, 2 x 10Gbps dual-
port Intel 82599EB adapter
Operating System, Version,
Bitness, and Service Pack
Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise 64-bit (prime client)
VMware ESXi 5.5.0 Update 1 Build 1881737 (virtual client hosts)
Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise 64-bit (virtual client)
Number of Virtual Clients 12
Number of vCPUs Per Virtual
Client
4
Number of vMem (GB) Per
Virtual Client
4
Virtual Client Networking Notes None
Virtual Client Storage Notes All clients stored on Dell Storage SC4020 storage array in a single LUN.
Other Hardware Brocade 6505 fabric switch for connectivity to Dell Storage SC4020.
Other Software None
Notes for Workload
Virtualization Software Notes
Virtual hardware for all VMs was set to V10
Ethernet adapter type set to vmxnet3 for all VMs (default vmxnet2)
CD and floppy were removed from all VMs (default attached)
Logging was disabled for all VMs (default enabled)
All VMs except standby configured as single virtual socket with multiple cores (default one core per multiple
virtual sockets)
SCSI adapter type PVSCSI used for all Standby VMs (default LSI Logic parallel)
SCSI adapter type PVSCSI used for all MailServer and Linux VMs (default LSI Logic SAS)
VMware tools were version 9344 on all VMs except standby VMs which used version 9227
vSphere DRS Migration Threshold set to Fully Automated Level 2
/adv/Cpu/CoschedCrossCall = 0 (default 1)
/adv/Cpu/HTWholeCoreThreshold = 0 (default 200)
/adv/DataMover/HardwareAcceleratedInit = 0 (default 1)
/adv/DataMover/HardwareAcceleratedMove = 0 (default 1)
/adv/Mem/BalancePeriod = 0 (default 15)
/adv/Mem/SamplePeriod = 0 (default 60)
/adv/Mem/ShareScanGHz = 0 (default 4)
/adv/Misc/TimerMaxHardPeriod = 4000 (default 100000)
/adv/Net/MaxNetifRxQueueLen = 500 (default 100)
/adv/Net/MaxNetifTxQueueLen = 1000 (default 500)
16. A Principled Technologies test report 16VMmark 2.5.2 virtualization performance of the Dell EqualLogic
PS6210XS storage array
/adv/Net/NetTxCompletionWorldlet = 0 (default 1)
/adv/Irq/IRQRebalancePeriod = 20000 (default 50)
/adv/Irq/BestVcpuRouting = 1 (default 0)
/adv/Numa/LTermFairnessInterval = 0 (default 5)
/adv/Numa/PreferHT = 1 (default 0)
/adv/Numa/MonMigEnable = 0 (default 1)
/adv/Numa/PageMigEnable = 0 (default 1)
/adv/Numa/RebalancePeriod = 60000 (default 2000)
/adv/Numa/SwapLoadEnable = 0 (default 1)
/adv/Numa/SwapLocalityEnable = 0 (default 1)
Server Notes
CPU C6 Report disabled (default enabled)
Package C state limit set to C0 (default no limit)
Intel Turbo Boost Enabled (frequency boost to 3.6 GHz) (default Enabled)
System Profile set to Performance in BIOS (default Performance Per Watt Optimized (DAPC)
Networking Notes
vSwitch Configuration:
vSwitch0 on vmnic0 (10Gb) for Service Console, all Standby, Mail, Olio, DS2, and Deploy VMs
vSwitch1 on vmnic2 (10Gb) for iSCSI traffic
vSwitch2 on vmnic1 (10Gb) for VMotion
vSwitch1 and vSwitch2 MTU size was modified to 9000 (default 1500)
Storage Notes
ESX was installed on a two-disk RAID 1 volume from the internal 85GB SAS hard drives in each system under test
The EqualLogic storage array was configured into one RAID 6 storage pool with a hotspare 10K RPM disk.
The storage pool was mapped to all servers.
Storage pool layout:
1 LUN at 1.5TB, as the transfer volume
1 LUN at 1TB, containing the DS2 DB VMs
1 LUN at 800GB, containing the DS Web VMs
1 LUN at 1.65TB, containing the Mailserver VMs
1 LUN at 350GB, containing the Olio DB VMs
1 LUN at 1.8TB, containing the Olio Web VMs
1 LUN at 120GB, containing the standby VMs
2 LUNs at 75GB, containing the Standby source targets
1 LUN at 30GB, containing the Deploy cloning target location
1 LUN at 30GB, containing the Deploy template VMs
17. A Principled Technologies test report 17VMmark 2.5.2 virtualization performance of the Dell EqualLogic
PS6210XS storage array
Datacenter Management Server Notes
The Datacenter Management Server was a virtual machine configured with 4 vCPU and 12GB RAM on a separate ESXi
host.
Operating System Notes
All Mailservers ran Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise 64-bit
Software Notes
None
Client Notes
Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise 64-bit installed on client virtual machines and updated through
Windows Update
Prime client was running Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise 64-bit and VMware vSphere PowerCLI
5.5 Release 2 build 1671586
Prime client ran as a physical client
All other clients ran as virtual machines that were each defined with 4 virtual CPUs, 4GB of memory, 1 vmxnet3
network, and 36GB of disk space
All virtual clients were hosted on a 4 virtual client host cluster.
Clients ran with default ESX settings
Other Notes
VMMARK2.CONFIG was modified with RMQ_PowerCLI_Delay=20
This is a full disclosure report for a VMmark benchmark result. All published VMmark results must be from fully-
compliant tests for which a full disclosure report is publicly available.
For information about VMmark and the rules regarding its usage visit www.vmware.com/products/vmmark.
VMware and VMmark are trademarks or registered trademarks of VMware, Inc. VMware® VMmark® is a product of
VMware, Inc. VMmark utilizes the SPEC Power and Temperature Daemon (SPEC PTDaemon), which is available from the
Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation (SPEC®). VMmark results are not SPEC metrics and cannot be compared
to SPEC metrics in any way.
18. A Principled Technologies test report 18VMmark 2.5.2 virtualization performance of the Dell EqualLogic
PS6210XS storage array
ABOUT PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES
Principled Technologies, Inc.
1007 Slater Road, Suite 300
Durham, NC, 27703
www.principledtechnologies.com
We provide industry-leading technology assessment and fact-based
marketing services. We bring to every assignment extensive experience
with and expertise in all aspects of technology testing and analysis, from
researching new technologies, to developing new methodologies, to
testing with existing and new tools.
When the assessment is complete, we know how to present the results to
a broad range of target audiences. We provide our clients with the
materials they need, from market-focused data to use in their own
collateral to custom sales aids, such as test reports, performance
assessments, and white papers. Every document reflects the results of
our trusted independent analysis.
We provide customized services that focus on our clients’ individual
requirements. Whether the technology involves hardware, software, Web
sites, or services, we offer the experience, expertise, and tools to help our
clients assess how it will fare against its competition, its performance, its
market readiness, and its quality and reliability.
Our founders, Mark L. Van Name and Bill Catchings, have worked
together in technology assessment for over 20 years. As journalists, they
published over a thousand articles on a wide array of technology subjects.
They created and led the Ziff-Davis Benchmark Operation, which
developed such industry-standard benchmarks as Ziff Davis Media’s
Winstone and WebBench. They founded and led eTesting Labs, and after
the acquisition of that company by Lionbridge Technologies were the
head and CTO of VeriTest.
Principled Technologies is a registered trademark of Principled Technologies, Inc.
All other product names are the trademarks of their respective owners.
Disclaimer of Warranties; Limitation of Liability:
PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES, INC. HAS MADE REASONABLE EFFORTS TO ENSURE THE ACCURACY AND VALIDITY OF ITS TESTING, HOWEVER,
PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS ANY WARRANTY, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, RELATING TO THE TEST RESULTS AND
ANALYSIS, THEIR ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS OR QUALITY, INCLUDING ANY IMPLIED WARRANTY OF FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
ALL PERSONS OR ENTITIES RELYING ON THE RESULTS OF ANY TESTING DO SO AT THEIR OWN RISK, AND AGREE THAT PRINCIPLED
TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ITS EMPLOYEES AND ITS SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL HAVE NO LIABILITY WHATSOEVER FROM ANY CLAIM OF LOSS OR
DAMAGE ON ACCOUNT OF ANY ALLEGED ERROR OR DEFECT IN ANY TESTING PROCEDURE OR RESULT.
IN NO EVENT SHALL PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES, INC. BE LIABLE FOR INDIRECT, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES IN
CONNECTION WITH ITS TESTING, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. IN NO EVENT SHALL PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES,
INC.’S LIABILITY, INCLUDING FOR DIRECT DAMAGES, EXCEED THE AMOUNTS PAID IN CONNECTION WITH PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES, INC.’S
TESTING. CUSTOMER’S SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE REMEDIES ARE AS SET FORTH HEREIN.