The Dell Storage SC4020 array paired with Dell PowerEdge R620 servers supported 30 tiles of the VMmark 2.5.2 virtualization benchmark for a total of 240 running virtual machines. The system achieved a score of 31.35 at 30 tiles, indicating it can handle multiple virtualized applications and hypervisor operations while maintaining strong performance. Testing showed the SC4020 provided consistent I/O operations per second around 43,000 and latency mostly under 4 milliseconds. This performance demonstrates the SC4020 is suitable for increasing virtualized workloads supported by solid-state drives without degrading storage performance.
VMmark 2.5.2 virtualization performance of the Dell EqualLogic PS6210XS stora...Principled Technologies
Virtualization is a critical part of data center computing. For your virtualization solution to succeed, it is essential that you have a storage platform capable of delivering the performance and capacity needed for a virtualized environment in a cost effective way. The Dell EqualLogic PS6210XS array, paired with a cluster of Dell PowerEdge M620 servers, ran 12 VMmark tiles for a total of 96 running VMs, and achieved a score of 14.80@12. This performance, along with its value and ease of management, make the Dell EqualLogic PS6210XS array an excellent investment.
Resource balancing comparison: VMware vSphere 6 vs. Red Hat Enterprise Virtua...Principled Technologies
Having ample resources to handle user requests is a necessity of modern virtualization solutions. Allocating and distributing those resources evenly, however, is imperative to the success of your business’s virtualized environment. In our tests, after powering on the other two servers in our three-node cluster and adding resource management features, VMware vSphere 6 improved performance by 183 percent over its baseline configuration of one active server and no resource management features. RHEV 3.5, in contrast, delivered only a 79 percent increase over its baseline. As you design your business’s infrastructure and applications, improvements such as those offered by VMware vSphere 6 DRS and Storage DRS can play a critical role by offering your users better application experiences. Optimized and modern resource management provided by VMware DRS can also help to lower your IT purchase and maintenance costs by reducing the number of servers necessary to run your applications.
VMmark virtualization performance of Micron Enterprise PCIe SSD-based SANPrincipled Technologies
The storage you use for your virtualization solution can be a significant factor in its performance and effectiveness. Two Dell PowerEdge R720 servers, paired with Micron Enterprise PCIe SSD-based SAN, ran 10 VMmark tiles for a total of 80 running VMs and achieved a score of 12.05@10 tiles, making it the top score running VMware ESXi 5.5 of the 32-core server configurations. For enterprises that need excellent virtualization performance, this makes Micron Enterprise PCIe SSD-based SAN a wise investment.
Minimizing licensing costs for enterprise applications is vital to organizations looking to keep costs down. When your applications use per-core licensing, choosing higher-performance servers with fewer cores dramatically reduces your software-related spending. The Dell PowerEdge M820 blade solution with Compellent storage could deliver up to $96,236 in savings as compared to a single HP ProLiant BL680c G7 solution, and if consolidating multiple workloads, could deliver even more savings in licensing costs when running Microsoft SQL Server in a virtualized scenario – all while maintaining or exceeding previous performance levels.
Database performance and memory capacity with the Intel Xeon processor E5-266...Principled Technologies
The Dell PowerEdge M620 offers 24 memory slots, 50 percent more than the 16 slots offered by the HP ProLiant BL460c Gen8, which enables the Dell solution to provide greater performance while delivering memory error protection. We found that the Dell PowerEdge M620 solution, built on the new Intel Xeon processor E5-2600v2 Series, delivered 182.2 percent more database performance and 92.0 percent faster response times than the previous version Intel Xeon E5-2640 processor-based HP ProLiant BL460c Gen 8 solution, while providing 12.5 percent more available memory and error protection. The additional memory capacity of the Dell solution allowed us to engage FRM technologies and still have more overall RAM capacity compared to the 16-slot HP server. The Dell PowerEdge M620 offered maximum memory capacity and protection with Fault Resilient Memory to keep your database workloads running strong and available for your business needs.
Managing clients with Dell Client Integration Pack 3.0 and Microsoft System C...Principled Technologies
Client management is an important part of any enterprise. Employees have workstations in their offices or notebooks that travel with them around the globe, and efficient updates and remote management capabilities keep an organization’s IT assets ordered and secure. Microsoft System Center Configuration Manager 2012 can provide a robust, efficient, management system for your IT infrastructure. Selecting clients that not only operate within your IT framework, but that have built-in software to integrate with it seamlessly to make client management tasks even easier is an intelligent strategy for your IT department.
In our tests, we found that Dell client management tools (Dell Client Integration Pack, Dell Client Configuration Toolkit, and Dell OpenManage Client Instrumentation) integrated in a typical SCCM 2012 environment reduced the steps it took to complete client management tasks by as much as 77 percent, and included a number of features that weren’t available with clients from HP and Lenovo.
Dell PowerEdge R920 and Microsoft SQL Server 2014 Migration and Benefits GuidePrincipled Technologies
The latest Dell PowerEdge R920 server is designed to provide highly scalable performance for large enterprises, with greater memory capacity, improved and expanded attached storage options, and processor architectures designed for high availability. Microsoft SQL Server 2014 is the perfect companion software to take advantage of the Dell PowerEdge R920’s impressive specifications. Upgrading has never looked more attractive, and with hardware/software upgrades must come data migration.
Migrating legacy database applications to the latest database technologies on newer Dell server platforms is a common task for businesses upgrading their hardware/software stack. As this guide shows, the process is straightforward and the cost benefits can be enormous. We calculated the savings attainable from multiple consolidation ratios, as well as how long it would take to pay off the replacement server. We found that a consolidation ratio of 13 to 1 could yield $531,725 in software savings, many times the cost of the replacement hardware itself. So not only will the business benefit from the massively-scalable current-generation Dell server technology paired with Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 running SQL Server 2014, but you can save money in the process.
Dell 3-2-1 Reference Configurations: High available and scalable performance ...Principled Technologies
Dell 3-2-1 Reference Configurations consisting of Dell PowerEdge R720 servers, Dell Force10 S4810P switches, and Dell EqualLogic PS6110XV storage provide a range of configuration options so that you can select the one that is right for your business needs. Additionally, each configuration is easily scalable to accommodate for business growth.
The 3-2-1 base configuration provides a robust solution for any business needing to support up to 500 users on multiple business applications. Our tests demonstrate this solution supporting 500 users per VM for four VMs including two database VMs, one email VM, and one collaboration application VM.
If the number of users you need to support exceeds the user count the base configuration provides, adding another Dell PowerEdge R720 server to make a 4-2-1 configuration can support up to 1,000 users on multiple business applications while maintaining high availability. Our tests demonstrate this solution supporting 1,000 users per VM in the same four VMs as the 3-2-1 solution. Additionally, these configurations are so easy to scale upward that you can complete the process of adding a server in a matter of two hours or less from start to finish.
If you require support for an even higher number of users, adding a server and storage array to the base configuration, to make a 4-2-2 configuration allows for up to 1,500 users on multiple business applications. Our tests demonstrated this when we ran 1,500 users against each of the four VMs. Better yet, adding a Dell EqualLogic PS6110XV storage array to an existing 4-2-1 configuration is a cinch, taking under 30 minutes start to finish.
All of these Dell Reference Configurations give your business the reliability of highly available hardware configurations, greatly reducing downtime resulting from any hardware malfunctions.
By choosing proven Dell architecture, you avoid the hassles of putting your infrastructure together piece by piece, reducing the potential for error and providing you with a sturdy solution that is easily scalable to fit your present and future needs.
VMmark 2.5.2 virtualization performance of the Dell EqualLogic PS6210XS stora...Principled Technologies
Virtualization is a critical part of data center computing. For your virtualization solution to succeed, it is essential that you have a storage platform capable of delivering the performance and capacity needed for a virtualized environment in a cost effective way. The Dell EqualLogic PS6210XS array, paired with a cluster of Dell PowerEdge M620 servers, ran 12 VMmark tiles for a total of 96 running VMs, and achieved a score of 14.80@12. This performance, along with its value and ease of management, make the Dell EqualLogic PS6210XS array an excellent investment.
Resource balancing comparison: VMware vSphere 6 vs. Red Hat Enterprise Virtua...Principled Technologies
Having ample resources to handle user requests is a necessity of modern virtualization solutions. Allocating and distributing those resources evenly, however, is imperative to the success of your business’s virtualized environment. In our tests, after powering on the other two servers in our three-node cluster and adding resource management features, VMware vSphere 6 improved performance by 183 percent over its baseline configuration of one active server and no resource management features. RHEV 3.5, in contrast, delivered only a 79 percent increase over its baseline. As you design your business’s infrastructure and applications, improvements such as those offered by VMware vSphere 6 DRS and Storage DRS can play a critical role by offering your users better application experiences. Optimized and modern resource management provided by VMware DRS can also help to lower your IT purchase and maintenance costs by reducing the number of servers necessary to run your applications.
VMmark virtualization performance of Micron Enterprise PCIe SSD-based SANPrincipled Technologies
The storage you use for your virtualization solution can be a significant factor in its performance and effectiveness. Two Dell PowerEdge R720 servers, paired with Micron Enterprise PCIe SSD-based SAN, ran 10 VMmark tiles for a total of 80 running VMs and achieved a score of 12.05@10 tiles, making it the top score running VMware ESXi 5.5 of the 32-core server configurations. For enterprises that need excellent virtualization performance, this makes Micron Enterprise PCIe SSD-based SAN a wise investment.
Minimizing licensing costs for enterprise applications is vital to organizations looking to keep costs down. When your applications use per-core licensing, choosing higher-performance servers with fewer cores dramatically reduces your software-related spending. The Dell PowerEdge M820 blade solution with Compellent storage could deliver up to $96,236 in savings as compared to a single HP ProLiant BL680c G7 solution, and if consolidating multiple workloads, could deliver even more savings in licensing costs when running Microsoft SQL Server in a virtualized scenario – all while maintaining or exceeding previous performance levels.
Database performance and memory capacity with the Intel Xeon processor E5-266...Principled Technologies
The Dell PowerEdge M620 offers 24 memory slots, 50 percent more than the 16 slots offered by the HP ProLiant BL460c Gen8, which enables the Dell solution to provide greater performance while delivering memory error protection. We found that the Dell PowerEdge M620 solution, built on the new Intel Xeon processor E5-2600v2 Series, delivered 182.2 percent more database performance and 92.0 percent faster response times than the previous version Intel Xeon E5-2640 processor-based HP ProLiant BL460c Gen 8 solution, while providing 12.5 percent more available memory and error protection. The additional memory capacity of the Dell solution allowed us to engage FRM technologies and still have more overall RAM capacity compared to the 16-slot HP server. The Dell PowerEdge M620 offered maximum memory capacity and protection with Fault Resilient Memory to keep your database workloads running strong and available for your business needs.
Managing clients with Dell Client Integration Pack 3.0 and Microsoft System C...Principled Technologies
Client management is an important part of any enterprise. Employees have workstations in their offices or notebooks that travel with them around the globe, and efficient updates and remote management capabilities keep an organization’s IT assets ordered and secure. Microsoft System Center Configuration Manager 2012 can provide a robust, efficient, management system for your IT infrastructure. Selecting clients that not only operate within your IT framework, but that have built-in software to integrate with it seamlessly to make client management tasks even easier is an intelligent strategy for your IT department.
In our tests, we found that Dell client management tools (Dell Client Integration Pack, Dell Client Configuration Toolkit, and Dell OpenManage Client Instrumentation) integrated in a typical SCCM 2012 environment reduced the steps it took to complete client management tasks by as much as 77 percent, and included a number of features that weren’t available with clients from HP and Lenovo.
Dell PowerEdge R920 and Microsoft SQL Server 2014 Migration and Benefits GuidePrincipled Technologies
The latest Dell PowerEdge R920 server is designed to provide highly scalable performance for large enterprises, with greater memory capacity, improved and expanded attached storage options, and processor architectures designed for high availability. Microsoft SQL Server 2014 is the perfect companion software to take advantage of the Dell PowerEdge R920’s impressive specifications. Upgrading has never looked more attractive, and with hardware/software upgrades must come data migration.
Migrating legacy database applications to the latest database technologies on newer Dell server platforms is a common task for businesses upgrading their hardware/software stack. As this guide shows, the process is straightforward and the cost benefits can be enormous. We calculated the savings attainable from multiple consolidation ratios, as well as how long it would take to pay off the replacement server. We found that a consolidation ratio of 13 to 1 could yield $531,725 in software savings, many times the cost of the replacement hardware itself. So not only will the business benefit from the massively-scalable current-generation Dell server technology paired with Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 running SQL Server 2014, but you can save money in the process.
Dell 3-2-1 Reference Configurations: High available and scalable performance ...Principled Technologies
Dell 3-2-1 Reference Configurations consisting of Dell PowerEdge R720 servers, Dell Force10 S4810P switches, and Dell EqualLogic PS6110XV storage provide a range of configuration options so that you can select the one that is right for your business needs. Additionally, each configuration is easily scalable to accommodate for business growth.
The 3-2-1 base configuration provides a robust solution for any business needing to support up to 500 users on multiple business applications. Our tests demonstrate this solution supporting 500 users per VM for four VMs including two database VMs, one email VM, and one collaboration application VM.
If the number of users you need to support exceeds the user count the base configuration provides, adding another Dell PowerEdge R720 server to make a 4-2-1 configuration can support up to 1,000 users on multiple business applications while maintaining high availability. Our tests demonstrate this solution supporting 1,000 users per VM in the same four VMs as the 3-2-1 solution. Additionally, these configurations are so easy to scale upward that you can complete the process of adding a server in a matter of two hours or less from start to finish.
If you require support for an even higher number of users, adding a server and storage array to the base configuration, to make a 4-2-2 configuration allows for up to 1,500 users on multiple business applications. Our tests demonstrated this when we ran 1,500 users against each of the four VMs. Better yet, adding a Dell EqualLogic PS6110XV storage array to an existing 4-2-1 configuration is a cinch, taking under 30 minutes start to finish.
All of these Dell Reference Configurations give your business the reliability of highly available hardware configurations, greatly reducing downtime resulting from any hardware malfunctions.
By choosing proven Dell architecture, you avoid the hassles of putting your infrastructure together piece by piece, reducing the potential for error and providing you with a sturdy solution that is easily scalable to fit your present and future needs.
Migrating to Microsoft Windows Server 2012 and Microsoft SQL Server 2012 on D...Principled Technologies
Migrating your legacy servers running Microsoft SQL Server 2005 and Microsoft Windows Server 2003 to a new Dell PowerEdge R720 running Microsoft SQL Server 2012 and Microsoft Windows Server 2012 can streamline your infrastructure and deliver savings to your business.
With careful planning, and by following the straightforward process that this guide presents, you can realize the benefits of switching to your new server-and-software solution in no time.
Fusion-io Virtualization Reference Architecture: Deploying Server and Desktop...Principled Technologies
In our testing, Fusion ioControl, Cisco UCS, and VMware technologies created a high-performance, easy-to-configure and manage solution that could handle a demanding mixed application environment consisting of common virtualized business applications and VDI. By prioritizing performance resources with ioControl QoS service levels and policies, we demonstrated that mission-critical and business-critical applications will run at optimum performance levels in a 600 virtual desktop boot storm, or an OLTP heavy-workload use case. By adding Fusion ioTurbine software and Cisco Fusion ioDrive2 into the UCS Blade Server, we further extended OLTP performance with no additional solution footprint. With the Fusion ioControl UI and ioSphere UI integration with vCenter Server, you can manage all aspects of storage, both ioControl and UCS-side Fusion ioDrive flash, from within vCenter console. Fusion ioControl Hybrid Storage and Cisco UCS is a strong solution to meet today’s demanding mixed workloads in your VMware virtualized data center.
Dell Acceleration Appliance for Databases 2.0 and Microsoft SQL Server 2014: ...Principled Technologies
As this guide has shown, installing and configuring a Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 with SQL Server 2014 powered by the Dell Acceleration Appliance for Databases is a straightforward procedure. A key benefit from implementing DAAD 2.0 into your infrastructure is the ability to accelerate workloads without a complete storage area network redesign. This can be ideal for businesses that have snapshot and deduplication features within their software stack or are looking to improve database performance without investing in large storage solutions that may contain features they do not need. Consider DAAD 2.0 for your business—a storage acceleration solution that requires only 4U of rack space and can potentially give your database workloads a boost.
Administrators can spend a great deal of time deploying and managing computing resources, especially when dealing with ROBO environments. The Dell PowerEdge VRTX, powered by the Intel Xeon processor E5-2400 v2 product family and running Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2, gives administrators centralized management tools to help them provide time saving benefits and integrated toolsets.
In our hands-on testing, we found that the Dell PowerEdge VRTX greatly simplified deployment through an easy, wizard-based setup of Microsoft Windows Server Failover Clusters across server nodes with the Dell OpenManage Cluster Configurator. It also provided versatile hardware resource reassignment through a shared PCIe bus and efficient centralized management through CMC and scripting. Finally, we found that the Dell System Update Utility worked seamlessly with Microsoft Cluster-Aware Updating to update server nodes while keeping the failover cluster online and minimizing downtime. These advantages make the Dell PowerEdge VRTX an attractive choice for those who seek to reduce the management overhead of their ROBO environments.
Dell PowerEdge M520 server solution: Energy efficiency and database performancePrincipled Technologies
As energy prices continue to rise, building a power-efficient data center that does not sacrifice performance is vital to organizations looking to keep costs down while keeping application performance high. Choosing servers that pair high performance with new power-efficient technologies helps you do so. In our tests, the Dell PowerEdge M520 with Dell EqualLogic PS-M4110 arrays outperformed the HP ProLiant BL460c Gen8 server with HP StorageWorks D2200sb arrays by 113.5 percent in OPM. Not only did the Dell PowerEdge M520 blade server solution deliver higher overall performance, it also did so more efficiently, delivering 79.9 percent better database performance/watt than the HP ProLiant BL460c Gen8 solution.
Boosting virtualization performance with Intel SSD DC Series P3600 NVMe SSDs ...Principled Technologies
When it comes time to make your server purchase or if you’re looking for an easy way to boost performance of existing infrastructure, consider upgrading your server’s internal storage. As our hands-on tests with a Dell EMC PowerEdge R630 environment running VMware Virtual SAN proved, Intel SSD DC P3600 Series NVMe SSDs could increase virtualized mixed-workload performance by as much as 59.9 percent compared to SATA SSDs while allowing you to run a large additional number of VMs. When you improve performance for your virtualized workloads, your employees and customers will benefit. By increasing performance with Intel NVMe SSDs on your Dell EMC PowerEdge R630 servers, you can potentially slash wait times and do more work on your servers without having to expand your infrastructure with additional storage arrays, which can translate to happier users and a more efficient infrastructure.
Dell PowerEdge R920 running Oracle Database: Benefits of upgrading with NVMe ...Principled Technologies
Strong server performance is essential to companies running Oracle Database. The new Dell PowerEdge R920 provides strong performance in its base configuration with 24 SAS hard disks, but this performance gets an enormous boost when running the configuration containing NVMe Express Flash PCIe SSDs. In our testing, the upgraded configuration of the Dell PowerEdge R920 delivered 14.9 times the database performance of the base configuration. In addition, in testing the raw I/O throughput of the NVMe Express Flash PCIe SSDs, we saw as much as 192.8 times the IOPS as compared to the base configuration. Given that the storage subsystem is critical in servers and specifically database applications, the performance improvements offered by NVMe Express Flash PCIe SSDs can lead to great service improvements for your customers, making this upgrade a very wise investment.
The switching method you choose for your SBC environment can help determine performance and the experience that end-users have. We found that unifying switching with Cisco VM-FEX resulted in up to 29 percent lower latency than a solution using a traditional vSwitch when running a Citrix XenApp hosted shared desktop farm. Furthermore, the Cisco VM-FEX solution used up to 53 percent less CPU than the vSwitch solution did under extreme network conditions. In addition to these performance advantages, Cisco UCS Manager provides a central point of management and a simplified method to add vSphere hosts to the VM-FEX-enabled vSwitch, which can reduce management time and costs.
As our results show, switching to Cisco VM-FEX can provide your users with a more responsive environment.
Citrix XenDesktop 5.5 vs. VMware View 5: User experience and bandwidth consum...Principled Technologies
The document compares the user experience and bandwidth consumption of Citrix XenDesktop 5.5 and VMware View 5 for delivering virtual desktops to remote offices over bandwidth-constrained WAN connections. Testing in simulated small and medium-sized branch office environments found that with default configurations, Citrix XenDesktop 5.5 provided a better user experience than VMware View 5 while using less bandwidth, with savings of up to 16.3% in the small office scenario and up to 37.1% in the medium office scenario. Enabling features like Citrix Branch Repeater provided even further improvements to user experience and bandwidth efficiency.
Database performance: Dell PowerEdge R730xd vs. Lenovo ThinkServer RD650Principled Technologies
The document compares the database performance of the Dell PowerEdge R730xd server to the Lenovo ThinkServer RD650 server. It finds that the Dell PowerEdge R730xd delivered 27.9% more orders per minute for a Microsoft SQL Server 2014 database application than the Lenovo server. It also had lower application response times, up to 24.6% better, and lower disk response times, up to 93.1% better. The Dell server was able to process more orders per minute with faster response times for end users due to its current-generation hardware, increased solid-state drives, and storage capacity three times that of the Lenovo server.
Setting up a failover cluster on the Dell PowerEdge VRTX is a straightforward process. In very little time, you can deploy Dell PowerEdge VRTX with up to four M-series servers, switches, and storage in a redundant configuration using Microsoft Windows Server 2012 Hyper-V. By setting up a failover cluster on your compact Dell PowerEdge VRTX, you can maximize server uptime to keep your business moving.
HP PolyServe Software for Microsoft SQL Serverwebhostingguy
The HP PolyServe Software for Microsoft SQL Server enables consolidation of multiple SQL Server instances onto fewer servers and centralized storage. It provides high availability, virtualization-like flexibility, scalable capacity allocation, and instance mobility. Key features include an adaptive SQL platform, consolidated data management, and high availability for mission-critical applications. It goes beyond consolidation and failovers to meet Microsoft's SQL Server Always On requirements, making it ideal for database consolidation.
Virtual Solution for Microsoft SQL Serverwebhostingguy
This document describes a virtualization solution for running Microsoft SQL Server using VMware Infrastructure 3 and EMC Celerra IP Storage servers. The solution provides benefits like high availability, scalability, and maintaining performance. It ensures SQL Server environments remain available and can grow easily. Virtualizing SQL Server reduces complexity, improves flexibility and reliability of the infrastructure, and allows for simple disaster recovery and provisioning of new resources. The solution consists of VMware Infrastructure 3 for virtualization, EMC Celerra IP storage servers, Dell PowerEdge servers, and Microsoft SQL Server.
Populating your data center with new, more powerful and energy efficient servers can deliver numerous benefits to your organization. By consolidating multiple older servers onto a new platform, you can save in the areas of data center space and port costs, management costs, and power and cooling costs.
In our tests, we found that the Lenovo ThinkServer RD630 could consolidate the workloads of three HP ProLiant DL385 G5 servers, while increasing overall performance by 82.6 percent and reducing power consumption by 58.8 percent, making the ThinkServer RD630 an excellent choice to reduce the costs associated with running your data center.
This document provides a step-by-step guide for configuring distributed data center virtualization using Windows Virtual Server 2005 R2, Sanbolic's Melio File System, and Microsoft Clustering Services. Key steps include installing required software, configuring a two-node Microsoft Clustering Services cluster, creating virtual machines and storage on a SAN, and configuring resources to allow active virtual machines to migrate across physical hosts while maintaining access to shared storage.
Dell 3-2-1 Reference Configurations: Scalable performance and simplicity in s...Principled Technologies
Dell 3-2-1 Reference Configurations provide a range of virtualized infrastructure solutions to meet your business’s needs today and in the future. Easy to deploy, manage, and upgrade, these robust solutions can grow as your business does, all the while reducing the likelihood of extended downtime due to their highly available architecture.
This White Paper describes the EMC Backup-as-a-Service (BaaS) solution based on EMC Avamar, EMC Data Protection Advisor, and EMC HomeBase, which allows service providers to deliver backup services for cloud and traditional hosted environments, reduce storage space, increase backup speeds, and provide portal-based backup management.
The document discusses tools and components in the Windows Assessment and Deployment Kit (ADK) for automating deployment, imaging, and managing configurations across enterprise environments. It describes tools for migrating user profiles and files, activating Windows installations, monitoring performance, and assessing existing systems. The Windows ADK components allow automating deployments, centralized management of configurations, and compliance with industry standards.
White Paper Dell Reference Configuration Deploying Microsoft ...webhostingguy
This white paper provides configuration guidelines for deploying SQL Server 2005 on Dell PowerEdge servers with Dell PowerVault storage. It recommends best practices for hardware and software setup, including:
1) Separating TempDB, transaction logs, and database data onto distinct disk groups and virtual disks for improved I/O performance.
2) Configuring server NIC teaming and dual-port SAS controllers for network and storage redundancy.
3) Optimizing the Windows 2003 installation with features like disk partition alignment and file system configuration.
4) Configuring SQL Server 2005 with recommendations for TempDB file placement and sizing.
The document aims to help IT professionals implement a tested Dell configuration for SQL Server 2005
Consolidate and upgrade: Dell PowerEdge VRTX and Microsoft SQL Server 2014Principled Technologies
Your growing business shouldn’t run on aging hardware and software until it fails. Adding memory and upgrading processors will not provide the same benefits to your infrastructure as a consolidation and upgrade can. Upgrading and consolidating your IT infrastructure to the Dell PowerEdge VRTX running Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 and SQL Server 2014 can improve performance while adding features such as high availability.
Based on our findings, a single Dell PowerEdge VRTX can replace four four-year-old dual-socket servers with VMs running heavy SQL database workloads. We found that consolidating four older servers onto a Dell PowerEdge VRTX and upgrading to Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 with Hyper-V and SQL Server 2014 could save up to $16,390 over three years, compared to keeping the four-year-old dual-socket servers and upgrading existing storage infrastructure. If your business runs older versions of Microsoft SQL Server on end-of-life dual-socket servers, the Dell PowerEdge VRTX with Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 with Hyper-V and SQL Server 2014 could save your company these costs while delivering better performance than the aging hardware and software.
Deploy with confidence: VMware Cloud Foundation 5.1 on next gen Dell PowerEdg...Principled Technologies
A Principled Technologies deployment guide
Conclusion
Deploying VMware Cloud Foundation 5.1 on next gen Dell PowerEdge servers brings together critical virtualization capabilities and high-performing hardware infrastructure. Relying on our hands-on experience, this deployment guide offers a comprehensive roadmap that can guide your organization through the seamless integration of advanced VMware cloud solutions with the performance and reliability of Dell PowerEdge servers. In addition to the deployment efficiency, the Cloud Foundation 5.1 and PowerEdge solution delivered strong performance while running a MySQL database workload. By leveraging VMware Cloud Foundation 5.1 and PowerEdge servers, you could help your organization embrace cloud computing with confidence, potentially unlocking a new level of agility, scalability, and efficiency in your data center operations.
Upgrade your cloud infrastructure with Dell PowerEdge R760 servers and VMware...Principled Technologies
Compared to a cluster of PowerEdge R750 servers running VMware Cloud Foundation 4.5
Conclusion
If your company is struggling with underperforming infrastructure, upgrading to 16th Generation Dell PowerEdge servers running VCF 5.1 could be just what you need to handle more database throughput and reduce vSAN latencies. We found that a Dell PowerEdge R760 server cluster running VCF 5.1 processed over 78 percent more TPM and 79 percent more NOPM than a Dell PowerEdge R750 server cluster running VCF 4.5. It’s also worth noting that the PowerEdge R750 cluster bottlenecked on vSAN storage, with max write latency at 8.9ms. For reference, the PowerEdge R760 cluster clocked in at 3.8ms max write latency. This higher latency is due in part to the single disk group per host on the moderately configured PowerEdge R750 cluster, while the better-configured PowerEdge R760 cluster supported four disk groups per host. As an additional benefit to IT admins, we also found that the embedded VMware Aria Operation adapter provided useful infrastructure insights.
Migrating to Microsoft Windows Server 2012 and Microsoft SQL Server 2012 on D...Principled Technologies
Migrating your legacy servers running Microsoft SQL Server 2005 and Microsoft Windows Server 2003 to a new Dell PowerEdge R720 running Microsoft SQL Server 2012 and Microsoft Windows Server 2012 can streamline your infrastructure and deliver savings to your business.
With careful planning, and by following the straightforward process that this guide presents, you can realize the benefits of switching to your new server-and-software solution in no time.
Fusion-io Virtualization Reference Architecture: Deploying Server and Desktop...Principled Technologies
In our testing, Fusion ioControl, Cisco UCS, and VMware technologies created a high-performance, easy-to-configure and manage solution that could handle a demanding mixed application environment consisting of common virtualized business applications and VDI. By prioritizing performance resources with ioControl QoS service levels and policies, we demonstrated that mission-critical and business-critical applications will run at optimum performance levels in a 600 virtual desktop boot storm, or an OLTP heavy-workload use case. By adding Fusion ioTurbine software and Cisco Fusion ioDrive2 into the UCS Blade Server, we further extended OLTP performance with no additional solution footprint. With the Fusion ioControl UI and ioSphere UI integration with vCenter Server, you can manage all aspects of storage, both ioControl and UCS-side Fusion ioDrive flash, from within vCenter console. Fusion ioControl Hybrid Storage and Cisco UCS is a strong solution to meet today’s demanding mixed workloads in your VMware virtualized data center.
Dell Acceleration Appliance for Databases 2.0 and Microsoft SQL Server 2014: ...Principled Technologies
As this guide has shown, installing and configuring a Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 with SQL Server 2014 powered by the Dell Acceleration Appliance for Databases is a straightforward procedure. A key benefit from implementing DAAD 2.0 into your infrastructure is the ability to accelerate workloads without a complete storage area network redesign. This can be ideal for businesses that have snapshot and deduplication features within their software stack or are looking to improve database performance without investing in large storage solutions that may contain features they do not need. Consider DAAD 2.0 for your business—a storage acceleration solution that requires only 4U of rack space and can potentially give your database workloads a boost.
Administrators can spend a great deal of time deploying and managing computing resources, especially when dealing with ROBO environments. The Dell PowerEdge VRTX, powered by the Intel Xeon processor E5-2400 v2 product family and running Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2, gives administrators centralized management tools to help them provide time saving benefits and integrated toolsets.
In our hands-on testing, we found that the Dell PowerEdge VRTX greatly simplified deployment through an easy, wizard-based setup of Microsoft Windows Server Failover Clusters across server nodes with the Dell OpenManage Cluster Configurator. It also provided versatile hardware resource reassignment through a shared PCIe bus and efficient centralized management through CMC and scripting. Finally, we found that the Dell System Update Utility worked seamlessly with Microsoft Cluster-Aware Updating to update server nodes while keeping the failover cluster online and minimizing downtime. These advantages make the Dell PowerEdge VRTX an attractive choice for those who seek to reduce the management overhead of their ROBO environments.
Dell PowerEdge M520 server solution: Energy efficiency and database performancePrincipled Technologies
As energy prices continue to rise, building a power-efficient data center that does not sacrifice performance is vital to organizations looking to keep costs down while keeping application performance high. Choosing servers that pair high performance with new power-efficient technologies helps you do so. In our tests, the Dell PowerEdge M520 with Dell EqualLogic PS-M4110 arrays outperformed the HP ProLiant BL460c Gen8 server with HP StorageWorks D2200sb arrays by 113.5 percent in OPM. Not only did the Dell PowerEdge M520 blade server solution deliver higher overall performance, it also did so more efficiently, delivering 79.9 percent better database performance/watt than the HP ProLiant BL460c Gen8 solution.
Boosting virtualization performance with Intel SSD DC Series P3600 NVMe SSDs ...Principled Technologies
When it comes time to make your server purchase or if you’re looking for an easy way to boost performance of existing infrastructure, consider upgrading your server’s internal storage. As our hands-on tests with a Dell EMC PowerEdge R630 environment running VMware Virtual SAN proved, Intel SSD DC P3600 Series NVMe SSDs could increase virtualized mixed-workload performance by as much as 59.9 percent compared to SATA SSDs while allowing you to run a large additional number of VMs. When you improve performance for your virtualized workloads, your employees and customers will benefit. By increasing performance with Intel NVMe SSDs on your Dell EMC PowerEdge R630 servers, you can potentially slash wait times and do more work on your servers without having to expand your infrastructure with additional storage arrays, which can translate to happier users and a more efficient infrastructure.
Dell PowerEdge R920 running Oracle Database: Benefits of upgrading with NVMe ...Principled Technologies
Strong server performance is essential to companies running Oracle Database. The new Dell PowerEdge R920 provides strong performance in its base configuration with 24 SAS hard disks, but this performance gets an enormous boost when running the configuration containing NVMe Express Flash PCIe SSDs. In our testing, the upgraded configuration of the Dell PowerEdge R920 delivered 14.9 times the database performance of the base configuration. In addition, in testing the raw I/O throughput of the NVMe Express Flash PCIe SSDs, we saw as much as 192.8 times the IOPS as compared to the base configuration. Given that the storage subsystem is critical in servers and specifically database applications, the performance improvements offered by NVMe Express Flash PCIe SSDs can lead to great service improvements for your customers, making this upgrade a very wise investment.
The switching method you choose for your SBC environment can help determine performance and the experience that end-users have. We found that unifying switching with Cisco VM-FEX resulted in up to 29 percent lower latency than a solution using a traditional vSwitch when running a Citrix XenApp hosted shared desktop farm. Furthermore, the Cisco VM-FEX solution used up to 53 percent less CPU than the vSwitch solution did under extreme network conditions. In addition to these performance advantages, Cisco UCS Manager provides a central point of management and a simplified method to add vSphere hosts to the VM-FEX-enabled vSwitch, which can reduce management time and costs.
As our results show, switching to Cisco VM-FEX can provide your users with a more responsive environment.
Citrix XenDesktop 5.5 vs. VMware View 5: User experience and bandwidth consum...Principled Technologies
The document compares the user experience and bandwidth consumption of Citrix XenDesktop 5.5 and VMware View 5 for delivering virtual desktops to remote offices over bandwidth-constrained WAN connections. Testing in simulated small and medium-sized branch office environments found that with default configurations, Citrix XenDesktop 5.5 provided a better user experience than VMware View 5 while using less bandwidth, with savings of up to 16.3% in the small office scenario and up to 37.1% in the medium office scenario. Enabling features like Citrix Branch Repeater provided even further improvements to user experience and bandwidth efficiency.
Database performance: Dell PowerEdge R730xd vs. Lenovo ThinkServer RD650Principled Technologies
The document compares the database performance of the Dell PowerEdge R730xd server to the Lenovo ThinkServer RD650 server. It finds that the Dell PowerEdge R730xd delivered 27.9% more orders per minute for a Microsoft SQL Server 2014 database application than the Lenovo server. It also had lower application response times, up to 24.6% better, and lower disk response times, up to 93.1% better. The Dell server was able to process more orders per minute with faster response times for end users due to its current-generation hardware, increased solid-state drives, and storage capacity three times that of the Lenovo server.
Setting up a failover cluster on the Dell PowerEdge VRTX is a straightforward process. In very little time, you can deploy Dell PowerEdge VRTX with up to four M-series servers, switches, and storage in a redundant configuration using Microsoft Windows Server 2012 Hyper-V. By setting up a failover cluster on your compact Dell PowerEdge VRTX, you can maximize server uptime to keep your business moving.
HP PolyServe Software for Microsoft SQL Serverwebhostingguy
The HP PolyServe Software for Microsoft SQL Server enables consolidation of multiple SQL Server instances onto fewer servers and centralized storage. It provides high availability, virtualization-like flexibility, scalable capacity allocation, and instance mobility. Key features include an adaptive SQL platform, consolidated data management, and high availability for mission-critical applications. It goes beyond consolidation and failovers to meet Microsoft's SQL Server Always On requirements, making it ideal for database consolidation.
Virtual Solution for Microsoft SQL Serverwebhostingguy
This document describes a virtualization solution for running Microsoft SQL Server using VMware Infrastructure 3 and EMC Celerra IP Storage servers. The solution provides benefits like high availability, scalability, and maintaining performance. It ensures SQL Server environments remain available and can grow easily. Virtualizing SQL Server reduces complexity, improves flexibility and reliability of the infrastructure, and allows for simple disaster recovery and provisioning of new resources. The solution consists of VMware Infrastructure 3 for virtualization, EMC Celerra IP storage servers, Dell PowerEdge servers, and Microsoft SQL Server.
Populating your data center with new, more powerful and energy efficient servers can deliver numerous benefits to your organization. By consolidating multiple older servers onto a new platform, you can save in the areas of data center space and port costs, management costs, and power and cooling costs.
In our tests, we found that the Lenovo ThinkServer RD630 could consolidate the workloads of three HP ProLiant DL385 G5 servers, while increasing overall performance by 82.6 percent and reducing power consumption by 58.8 percent, making the ThinkServer RD630 an excellent choice to reduce the costs associated with running your data center.
This document provides a step-by-step guide for configuring distributed data center virtualization using Windows Virtual Server 2005 R2, Sanbolic's Melio File System, and Microsoft Clustering Services. Key steps include installing required software, configuring a two-node Microsoft Clustering Services cluster, creating virtual machines and storage on a SAN, and configuring resources to allow active virtual machines to migrate across physical hosts while maintaining access to shared storage.
Dell 3-2-1 Reference Configurations: Scalable performance and simplicity in s...Principled Technologies
Dell 3-2-1 Reference Configurations provide a range of virtualized infrastructure solutions to meet your business’s needs today and in the future. Easy to deploy, manage, and upgrade, these robust solutions can grow as your business does, all the while reducing the likelihood of extended downtime due to their highly available architecture.
This White Paper describes the EMC Backup-as-a-Service (BaaS) solution based on EMC Avamar, EMC Data Protection Advisor, and EMC HomeBase, which allows service providers to deliver backup services for cloud and traditional hosted environments, reduce storage space, increase backup speeds, and provide portal-based backup management.
The document discusses tools and components in the Windows Assessment and Deployment Kit (ADK) for automating deployment, imaging, and managing configurations across enterprise environments. It describes tools for migrating user profiles and files, activating Windows installations, monitoring performance, and assessing existing systems. The Windows ADK components allow automating deployments, centralized management of configurations, and compliance with industry standards.
White Paper Dell Reference Configuration Deploying Microsoft ...webhostingguy
This white paper provides configuration guidelines for deploying SQL Server 2005 on Dell PowerEdge servers with Dell PowerVault storage. It recommends best practices for hardware and software setup, including:
1) Separating TempDB, transaction logs, and database data onto distinct disk groups and virtual disks for improved I/O performance.
2) Configuring server NIC teaming and dual-port SAS controllers for network and storage redundancy.
3) Optimizing the Windows 2003 installation with features like disk partition alignment and file system configuration.
4) Configuring SQL Server 2005 with recommendations for TempDB file placement and sizing.
The document aims to help IT professionals implement a tested Dell configuration for SQL Server 2005
Consolidate and upgrade: Dell PowerEdge VRTX and Microsoft SQL Server 2014Principled Technologies
Your growing business shouldn’t run on aging hardware and software until it fails. Adding memory and upgrading processors will not provide the same benefits to your infrastructure as a consolidation and upgrade can. Upgrading and consolidating your IT infrastructure to the Dell PowerEdge VRTX running Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 and SQL Server 2014 can improve performance while adding features such as high availability.
Based on our findings, a single Dell PowerEdge VRTX can replace four four-year-old dual-socket servers with VMs running heavy SQL database workloads. We found that consolidating four older servers onto a Dell PowerEdge VRTX and upgrading to Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 with Hyper-V and SQL Server 2014 could save up to $16,390 over three years, compared to keeping the four-year-old dual-socket servers and upgrading existing storage infrastructure. If your business runs older versions of Microsoft SQL Server on end-of-life dual-socket servers, the Dell PowerEdge VRTX with Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 with Hyper-V and SQL Server 2014 could save your company these costs while delivering better performance than the aging hardware and software.
Deploy with confidence: VMware Cloud Foundation 5.1 on next gen Dell PowerEdg...Principled Technologies
A Principled Technologies deployment guide
Conclusion
Deploying VMware Cloud Foundation 5.1 on next gen Dell PowerEdge servers brings together critical virtualization capabilities and high-performing hardware infrastructure. Relying on our hands-on experience, this deployment guide offers a comprehensive roadmap that can guide your organization through the seamless integration of advanced VMware cloud solutions with the performance and reliability of Dell PowerEdge servers. In addition to the deployment efficiency, the Cloud Foundation 5.1 and PowerEdge solution delivered strong performance while running a MySQL database workload. By leveraging VMware Cloud Foundation 5.1 and PowerEdge servers, you could help your organization embrace cloud computing with confidence, potentially unlocking a new level of agility, scalability, and efficiency in your data center operations.
Upgrade your cloud infrastructure with Dell PowerEdge R760 servers and VMware...Principled Technologies
Compared to a cluster of PowerEdge R750 servers running VMware Cloud Foundation 4.5
Conclusion
If your company is struggling with underperforming infrastructure, upgrading to 16th Generation Dell PowerEdge servers running VCF 5.1 could be just what you need to handle more database throughput and reduce vSAN latencies. We found that a Dell PowerEdge R760 server cluster running VCF 5.1 processed over 78 percent more TPM and 79 percent more NOPM than a Dell PowerEdge R750 server cluster running VCF 4.5. It’s also worth noting that the PowerEdge R750 cluster bottlenecked on vSAN storage, with max write latency at 8.9ms. For reference, the PowerEdge R760 cluster clocked in at 3.8ms max write latency. This higher latency is due in part to the single disk group per host on the moderately configured PowerEdge R750 cluster, while the better-configured PowerEdge R760 cluster supported four disk groups per host. As an additional benefit to IT admins, we also found that the embedded VMware Aria Operation adapter provided useful infrastructure insights.
Business-critical applications on VMware vSphere 6, VMware Virtual SAN, and V...Principled Technologies
The document summarizes performance testing of VMware vSphere 6, VMware Virtual SAN, and VMware NSX running business-critical applications. In single-site testing, the solution delivered over 189,000 IOPS and 5ms average read latency under heavy workload. In two-site testing, it live migrated all VMs between sites in under 9 minutes with no downtime or performance degradation for applications. The software-defined datacenter solution provided reliable performance and business continuity for critical workloads.
White paper: IBM FlashSystems in VMware EnvironmentsthinkASG
Drive performance in VMware environments with IBM FlashSystem. IBM flash storage delivers extreme, scalable performance for virtualized infrastructure.
VDI performance comparison: Dell PowerEdge FX2 and FC430 servers with VMware ...Principled Technologies
Replacing your legacy VDI servers with a new Intel Xeon processor E5-2650 v3-powered Dell PowerEdge FX2 solution using VMware Virtual SAN can be a great boon for your enterprise.
In the Principled Technologies (PT) labs, this space-efficient, affordable solution outperformed a legacy server and traditional SAN VSAN by offering 72 percent greater VDI users. Additionally, it achieved greater performance while using 91 percent less space and at a cost of only $176.52 per user.
By supporting more users, saving space, and its affordability, an upgrade to the Intel-powered Dell PowerEdge FX2 solution using VMware Virtual SAN can be a wise move when replacing your aging, older infrastructure.
Upgrade to Dell EMC PowerEdge R940 servers with VMware vSphere 7.0 and gain g...Principled Technologies
The document summarizes a study that tested online transactional processing (OLTP) performance on two server solutions: a Dell EMC PowerEdge R940 server with VMware vSphere 7.0, and a previous-generation Dell EMC PowerEdge R930 server with vSphere 6.7. The study found that the R940 solution processed over 30% more operations per minute than the R930 solution. Upgrading to the R940 platform provides benefits like more processor cores, memory, and PCIe capacity. VMware vSphere 7.0 features like vLCM could help scale Dell EMC environments, and integrating with OpenManage for vCenter allows faster updating, upgrading, and compatibility checking.
This document describes testing of Hitachi Data Instance Director (HDID) to protect a Hitachi Unified Compute Platform HC V240 hyperconverged infrastructure running VMware vSphere. HDID provided agentless backups of VMs using VMware VADP and allowed cloning backups. Testing showed HDID can reduce backup windows and easily replicate backups within or outside the HC V240 chassis.
VDI performance comparison: Dell PowerEdge FX2 and FC430 servers with VMware ...Principled Technologies
Replacing your legacy VDI servers with a new Intel Xeon processor E5-2670 v3-powered Dell PowerEdge FX2 solution using VMware Virtual SAN can be a great boon for your enterprise.
In the Principled Technologies (PT) labs, this space-efficient, affordable solution outperformed a five-year-old legacy server and traditional SAN by offering twice as many VDI users. Additionally, it achieved greater performance while using 91 percent less space and at a cost of only $167.89 per user in hardware costs.
By supporting more users, saving space, and its affordability, an upgrade to the Intel-powered Dell PowerEdge FX2 solution using VMware Virtual SAN can be a wise move when replacing your aging, older infrastructure.
This document discusses the Dell EMC VxRAIL appliance, which is a hyper-converged infrastructure solution based on VMware's software-defined storage. It is a preconfigured appliance that can be easily deployed and managed. The appliance uses VMware Virtual SAN for the storage software and can be scaled out by adding additional nodes in a cluster. It offers various configurations to meet different use cases with options for all-flash or hybrid nodes. The document highlights key features of Virtual SAN like quality of service, management tools, deduplication and compression. It also outlines the simplified lifecycle management through automated configuration and non-disruptive scaling of the appliance cluster.
VMware provides several technology extensions for ISVs to extend their product capabilities in virtual and cloud environments. These include vSphere client plugins, SRM SRA adapters, VAAI plugins, and vCO plugins. These integration points allow ISVs to integrate their solutions into the VMware ecosystem to deliver value to customers through increased efficiency, reduced costs, improved performance, and ensuring SLAs are met.
A Dell PowerEdge MX environment using OpenManage Enterprise and OpenManage En...Principled Technologies
Compared to a Cisco UCS-X environment using Intersight, the Dell environment streamlined making changes to VLANs and helped avoid interventions during scheduled firmware updates
Conclusion
We executed two management scenarios in a Dell PowerEdge MX environment with Dell OpenManage Enterprise and OpenManage Enterprise Modular and a Cisco UCS X-Series chassis environment with Cisco Intersight. We learned that the Dell solution’s single-part profile modification for performing VLAN updates was quicker and simpler than the Cisco solution’s two-part profile deployment, requiring 40 percent less time and two-thirds as many steps. We also compared the firmware updating process on the solutions. Being able to schedule these updates to occur automatically from the online Dell repository offered an advantage over having to manually execute the same tasks from the Cisco Intersight repositories. Namely, administrators do not need to take action during maintenance windows but can instead schedule them ahead of time. Saving time on routine tasks frees administrators to pursue innovation, and being able to avoid middle-of-the-night duties helps companies provide a better work experience for admins. Together, these advantages help make Dell PowerEdge MX servers a good candidate for companies considering upgrading the older Cisco UCS servers in their data centers.
Implementing and managing large and distributed enterprise solutions presents unique administrative challenges. Anything that can streamline the process to minimize error and save administrator time and effort can have a strong, positive effect on your company’s bottom line. We found that the Dell Chassis Management Controller made deploying Dell PowerEdge M620 blades in a Dell PowerEdge M1000e chassis much quicker and easier by allowing you to import existing server profiles in just a few clicks. In our test case to configure for a common mission critical application, Citrix XenDesktop, manually deploying a full 16-blade chassis required 800 steps; but only 59 steps with Dell Chassis Management Controller, transforming a multi-hour task to one that took just minutes. Certain demanding applications can require even greater hardware configuration — these would benefit even more from the “all settings” profile capture and replication features of the Dell Chassis Management Controller.
The ability to pre-provision empty slots and export profiles for redeployment on other chassis further increases the value of the Dell Chassis Management Controller in bigger environments by largely eliminating tedious, redundant tasks and decreasing the opportunities for human error, while freeing administrators to perform other mission-critical or innovative activities. Choosing a solution that automates much of the deployment process is an asset to managing your infrastructure and your business.
Virtualization is an increasingly critical part of data center computing. Selecting a server that excels at virtualization makes good business sense. Two Lenovo ThinkServer RD630 servers, paired with Dot Hill AssuredSAN Pro5720 tiered storage, ran 10 VMmark tiles for a total of 80 running VMs and achieved a score of 11.17@10 tiles, placing it in the top 8 percent of the 32-core server configurations. This makes the Lenovo ThinkServer RD630 an excellent choice for any enterprise that uses virtualization.
A company’s success depends on critical application performance and availability. Upgrades and patches can improve application efficiency and user experience, but making the necessary changes requires resource intensive environments to test updates before deploying them. What’s more, these applications need to continue accessing data even in the event of an on-premises crisis.
Our Dell EMC VMAX 250F and PowerEdge server solution supported test/dev environments and production database applications simultaneously without affecting the production applications’ performance. Storage latency for the VMAX 250F peaked at a millisecond in our testing while IOPS stayed within an acceptable range. The solution also kept data highly available with no downtime or performance drop when we initiated a lost host connection for the primary storage. Consider the Dell EMC VMAX 250F array for your datacenter to support the critical database applications that drive your company.
The document outlines the responsibilities of an individual working as a Windows/VMware Engineer and vCloud Automation Engineer from December 2011 to March 2014. Their key responsibilities included building and managing a VMware environment, implementing vCloud Automation for provisioning, and providing Windows administration support. They also led a team to develop an automation tool called ICP that used PowerShell and the VMware API to automate various repetitive tasks related to virtual machine provisioning, monitoring, and decommissioning.
VMworld 2013: Maximize Database Performance in Your Software-Defined Data CenterVMworld
VMworld 2013
Mark Achtemichuk, VMware
Michael Webster, VMware
Learn more about VMworld and register at http://www.vmworld.com/index.jspa?src=socmed-vmworld-slideshare
The Dell PowerEdge VRTX is an all-inclusive platform, suitable for rapid deployment of a virtual environment, such as Citrix XenDesktop 7.5. The integrated components of the VRTX means your business has a centralized management console for the necessary data center components that support VDI environments. We found that the Dell PowerEdge VRTX and XenDesktop set up, configured, and deployed VDI users easily. The addition of Dell Wyse terminals demonstrates how your end-users can access your XenDesktop VDI environment with efficient hardware and little administrative effort. The combination of Dell PowerEdge VRTX and Citrix XenDesktop 7.5 can offer a unified, efficient, and simple enterprise-value VDI solution for your business, but without the resources and commitment need for supporting an enterprise data center.
Blue Medora Oracle Enterprise Manager (EM12c) Plug-in for VMware vSphereBlue Medora
Overview presentation for the Blue Medora Oracle Enterprise Manager 12c Plug-in for VMware vSphere. The plugin provides Oracle EM12c-based monitoring, management, and provisioning capabilities or vSphere based Datacenters, Clusters, ESX Hosts, and Virtual Machines.
Version 8, Released in December 2013 introduced a new EM12c 'VMware Management' target that extends EM12c's native DBaaS and MWaaS capabilities to VMware based infrastructures
Streamline operations with new and updated VMware vSphere 8.0 features on 16t...Principled Technologies
By using the latest software and Dell PowerEdge servers in your VMware vSphere environment, you can provide your data center administrators with new or updated tools that simplify routine tasks in both initial host setup and ongoing monitoring. In our exploration of the latest features in vSphere 8.0 Lifecycle Manager, we found that vSphere 8.0 on latest-gen Dell PowerEdge servers offers advantages compared to the previous generation, which may make an infrastructure update worth your while. By introducing vSphere Configuration Profiles and providing simpler image updates to vSphere clusters, VMware vSphere 8.0 on latest-generation Dell PowerEdge servers can help streamline operations for your administrative staff.
Upgrading to Windows Server 2019 on Dell EMC PowerEdge servers: A simple proc...Principled Technologies
Using Dell EMC PowerEdge R740xd servers with Intel Xeon Scalable processors, we upgraded from Windows Server 2016 and saw data compression ratios of up to 9.8:1 thanks to new Storage Spaces Direct features
Similar to VMmark 2.5.2 virtualization performance of the Dell Storage SC4020 array (20)
Help skilled workers succeed with Dell Latitude 7030 and 7230 Rugged Extreme ...Principled Technologies
Instead of equipping consumer-grade tablets with rugged cases
Conclusion
In our hands-on testing, the Dell Latitude 7030 and 7230 Rugged Extreme Tablets showed that they are better equipped to help skilled workers than consumer-grade Apple iPad Pro and Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 tablets in multiple ways. They provide more built-in capabilities and features than the consumer-grade tablets we tested. And, while they were more expensive than the rugged-case fortified consumer-grade options we tested, their rugged claims were more than skin deep.
In our performance and durability tests, the Dell Latitude 7030 and 7230 Rugged Extreme Tablets performed better in demanding manufacturing, logistics, and field service environments than consumer-grade tablets with rugged cases. Both Rugged Extreme Tablets, with their greater thermal range, suffered less performance degradation in extreme temperatures, never failed and were merely scuffed after 26 hard drops, survived a 10 minute drenching with no ill effects, and were easier to view in direct sunlight than Apple iPad Pro and Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 tablets.
Bring ideas to life with the HP Z2 G9 Tower Workstation - InfographicPrincipled Technologies
We compared CPU performance and noise output of an HP Z2 G9 Tower Workstation in High Performance Mode to a similarly configured Dell Precision 3660 Tower Workstation in its out-of-box performance mode
Investing in GenAI: Cost‑benefit analysis of Dell on‑premises deployments vs....Principled Technologies
Conclusion
Diving into the world of GenAI has the potential to yield a great many benefits for your organization, but it first requires consideration for how best to implement those GenAI workloads. Whether your AI goals are to create a chatbot for online visitors, generate marketing materials, aid troubleshooting, or something else, implementing an AI solution requires careful planning and decision-making. A major decision is whether to host GenAI in the cloud or keep your data on premises. Traditional on-premises solutions can provide superior security and control, a substantial concern when dealing with large amounts of potentially sensitive data. But will supporting a GenAI solution on site be a drain on an organization’s IT budget?
In our research, we found that the value proposition is just the opposite: Hosting GenAI workloads on premises, either in a traditional Dell solution or using a managed Dell APEX pay-per-use solution, could significantly lower your GenAI costs over 3 years compared to hosting these workloads in the cloud. In fact, we found that a comparable AWS SageMaker solution would cost up to 3.8 times as much and an Azure ML solution would cost up to 3.6 times as much as GenAI on a Dell APEX pay-per-use solution. These results show that organizations looking to implement GenAI and reap the business benefits to come can find many advantages in an on-premises Dell solution, whether they opt to purchase and manage it themselves or choose a subscription-based Dell APEX pay-per-use solution. Choosing an on-premises Dell solution could save your organization significantly over hosting GenAI in the cloud, while giving you control over the security and privacy of your data as well as any updates and changes to the environment, and while ensuring your environment is managed consistently.
Workstations powered by Intel can play a vital role in CPU-intensive AI devel...Principled Technologies
In three AI development workflows, Intel processor-powered workstations delivered strong performance, without using their GPUs, making them a good choice for this part of the AI process
Conclusion
We executed three AI development workflows on tower workstations and mobile workstations from three vendors, with each workflow utilizing only the Intel CPU cores, and found that these platforms were suitable for carrying out various AI tasks. For two of the workflows, we learned that completing the tasks on the tower workstations took roughly half as much time as on the mobile workstations. This supports the idea that the tower workstations would be appropriate for a development environment for more complex models with a greater volume of data and that the mobile workstations would be well-suited for data scientists fine-tuning simpler models. In the third workflow, we explored tower workstation performance with different precision levels and learned that using 16-bit floating point precision allowed the workstations to execute the workflow in less time and also reduced memory usage dramatically. For all three AI workflows we executed, we consider the time the workstations needed to complete the tasks to be acceptable, and believe that these workstations can be appropriate, cost-effective choices for these kinds of activities.
Enable security features with no impact to OLTP performance with Dell PowerEd...Principled Technologies
Get comparable online transaction processing (OLTP) performance with or without enabling AMD Secure Memory Encryption and AMD Secure Encrypted Virtualization - Encrypted State
Conclusion
You’ve likely already implemented many security measures for your servers, which may include physical security for the data center, hardware-level security, and software-level security. With the cost of data breaches high and still growing, however, wise IT teams will consider what additional security measures they may be able to implement.
AMD SME and SEV-ES are technologies that are already available within your AMD processor-powered 16th Generation Dell PowerEdge servers—and in our testing, we saw that they can offer extra layers of security without affecting performance. We compared the online transaction processing performance of a Dell PowerEdge R7625 server, powered by AMD EPYC 9274F processors, with and without these two security features enabled. We found that enabling AMD Secure Memory Encryption and Secure Encrypted Virtualization-Encrypted State did not impact performance at all.
If your team is assessing areas where you might be able to enhance security—without paying a large performance cost—consider enabling AME SME and AMD SEV-ES in your Dell PowerEdge servers.
Improving energy efficiency in the data center: Endure higher temperatures wi...Principled Technologies
In high-temperature test scenarios, a Dell PowerEdge HS5620 server continued running an intensive workload without component warnings or failures, while a Supermicro SYS‑621C-TN12R server failed
Conclusion: Remain resilient in high temperatures with the Dell PowerEdge HS5620 to help increase efficiency
Increasing your data center’s temperature can help your organization make strides in energy efficiency and cooling cost savings. With servers that can hold up to these higher everyday temperatures—as well as high temperatures due to unforeseen circumstances—your business can continue to deliver the performance your apps and clients require.
When we ran an intensive floating-point workload on a Dell PowerEdge HS5620 and a Supermicro SYS-621CTN12R in three scenario types simulating typical operations at 25°C, a fan failure, and an HVAC malfunction, the Dell server experienced no component warnings or failures. In contrast, the Supermicro server experienced warnings in all three scenario types and experienced component failures in the latter two tests, rendering the system unusable. When we inspected and analyzed each system, we found that the Dell PowerEdge HS5620 server’s motherboard layout, fans, and chassis offered cooling design advantages.
For businesses aiming to meet sustainability goals by running hotter data centers, as well as those concerned with server cooling design, the Dell PowerEdge HS5620 is a strong contender to take on higher temperatures during day-to-day operations and unexpected malfunctions.
Dell APEX Cloud Platform for Red Hat OpenShift: An easily deployable and powe...Principled Technologies
The 4th Generation Intel Xeon Scalable processor‑powered solution deployed in less than two hours and ran a Kubernetes container-based generative AI workload effectively
Dell APEX Cloud Platform for Red Hat OpenShift: An easily deployable and powe...Principled Technologies
The 4th Generation Intel Xeon Scalable processor‑powered solution deployed in less than two hours and ran a generative AI workload effectively
Conclusion
The appeal of incorporating GenAI into your organization’s operations is likely great. Getting started with an efficient solution for your next LLM workload or application can seem daunting because of the changing hardware and software landscape, but Dell APEX Cloud Platform for Red Hat OpenShift powered by 4th Gen Intel Xeon Scalable processors could provide the solution you need. We started with a Dell Validated Design as a reference, and then went on to modify the deployment as necessary for our Llama 2 workload. The Dell APEX Cloud Platform for Red Hat OpenShift solution worked well for our LLM, and by using this deployment guide in conjunction with numerous Dell documents and some flexibility, you could be well on your way to innovating your next GenAI breakthrough.
Upgrade your cloud infrastructure with Dell PowerEdge R760 servers and VMware...Principled Technologies
Compared to a cluster of PowerEdge R750 servers running VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF)
For organizations running clusters of moderately configured, older Dell PowerEdge servers with a previous version of VCF, upgrading to better-configured modern servers can provide a significant performance boost and more.
Upgrade your cloud infrastructure with Dell PowerEdge R760 servers and VMware...Principled Technologies
Compared to a cluster of PowerEdge R750 servers running VMware Cloud Foundation 4.5
If your company is struggling with underperforming infrastructure, upgrading to 16th Generation Dell PowerEdge servers running VCF 5.1 could be just what you need to handle more database throughput and reduce vSAN latencies. As an additional benefit to IT admins, we also found that the embedded VMware Aria Operation adapter provided useful infrastructure insights.
Realize 2.1X the performance with 20% less power with AMD EPYC processor-back...Principled Technologies
Three AMD EPYC processor-based two-processor solutions outshined comparable Intel Xeon Scalable processor-based solutions by handling more Redis workload transactions and requests while consuming less power
Conclusion
Performance and energy efficiency are significant factors in processor selection for servers running data-intensive workloads, such as Redis. We compared the Redis performance and energy consumption of a server cluster in three AMD EPYC two-processor configurations against that of a server cluster in two Intel Xeon Scalable two-processor configurations. In each of our three test scenarios, the server cluster backed by AMD EPYC processors outperformed the server cluster backed by Intel Xeon Scalable processors. In addition, one of the AMD EPYC processor-based clusters consumed 20 percent less power than its Intel Xeon Scalable processor-based counterpart. Combining these measurements gave us power efficiency metrics that demonstrate how valuable AMD EPYC processor-based servers could be—you could see better performance per watt with these AMD EPYC processor-based server clusters and potentially get more from your Redis or other data intensive applications and workloads while reducing data center power costs.
Improve performance and gain room to grow by easily migrating to a modern Ope...Principled Technologies
We deployed this modern environment, then migrated database VMs from legacy servers and saw performance improvements that support consolidation
Conclusion
If your organization’s transactional databases are running on gear that is several years old, you have much to gain by upgrading to modern servers with new processors and networking components and an OpenShift environment. In our testing, a modern OpenShift environment with a cluster of three Dell PowerEdge R7615 servers with 4th Generation AMD EPYC processors and high-speed 100Gb Broadcom NICs outperformed a legacy environment with MySQL VMs running on a cluster of three Dell PowerEdge R7515 servers with 3rd Generation AMD EPYC processors and 25Gb Broadcom NICs. We also easily migrated a VM from the legacy environment to the modern environment, with only a few steps required to set up and less than ten minutes of hands-on time. The performance advantage of the modern servers would allow a company to reduce the number of servers necessary to perform a given amount of database work, thus lowering operational expenditures such as power and cooling and IT staff time for maintenance. The high-speed 100Gb Broadcom NICs in this solution also give companies better network performance and networking capacity to grow as they embrace emerging technologies such as AI that put great demands on networks.
Boost PC performance: How more available memory can improve productivityPrincipled Technologies
With more memory available, system performance of three Dell devices increased, which can translate to a better user experience
Conclusion
When your system has plenty of RAM to meet your needs, you can efficiently access the applications and data you need to finish projects and to-do lists without sacrificing time and focus. Our test results show that with more memory available, three Dell PCs delivered better performance and took less time to complete the Procyon Office Productivity benchmark. These advantages translate to users being able to complete workflows more quickly and multitask more easily. Whether you need the mobility of the Latitude 5440, the creative capabilities of the Precision 3470, or the high performance of the OptiPlex Tower Plus 7010, configuring your system with more RAM can help keep processes running smoothly, enabling you to do more without compromising performance.
Based on our research using publicly available materials, it appears that Dell supports nine of the ten PC security features we investigated, HP supports six of them, and Lenovo supports three features.
Increase security, sustainability, and efficiency with robust Dell server man...Principled Technologies
Compared to the Supermicro management portfolio
Conclusion
Choosing a vendor for server purchases is about more than just the hardware platform. Decision-makers must also consider more long-term concerns, including system/data security, energy efficiency, and ease of management. These concerns make the systems management tools a vendor offers as important as the hardware.
We investigated the features and capabilities of server management tools from Dell and Supermicro, comparing Dell iDRAC9 against Supermicro IPMI for embedded server management and Dell OpenManage Enterprise and CloudIQ against Supermicro Server Manager for one-to-many device and console management and monitoring. We found that the Dell management tools provided more comprehensive security, sustainability, and management/monitoring features and capabilities than Supermicro servers did. In addition, Dell tools automated more tasks to ease server management, resulting in significant time savings for administrators versus having to do the same tasks manually with Supermicro tools.
When making a server purchase, a vendor’s associated management products are critical to protect data, support a more sustainable environment, and to ease the maintenance of systems. Our tests and research showed that the Dell management portfolio for PowerEdge servers offered more features to help organizations meet these goals than the comparable Supermicro management products.
Increase security, sustainability, and efficiency with robust Dell server man...Principled Technologies
Compared to the Supermicro management portfolio
Conclusion
Choosing a vendor for server purchases is about more than just the hardware platform. Decision-makers must also consider more long-term concerns, including system/data security, energy efficiency, and ease of management. These concerns make the systems management tools a vendor offers as important as the hardware.
We investigated the features and capabilities of server management tools from Dell and Supermicro, comparing Dell iDRAC9 against Supermicro IPMI for embedded server management and Dell OpenManage Enterprise and CloudIQ against Supermicro Server Manager for one-to-many device and console management and monitoring. We found that the Dell management tools provided more comprehensive security, sustainability, and management/monitoring features and capabilities than Supermicro servers did. In addition, Dell tools automated more tasks to ease server management, resulting in significant time savings for administrators versus having to do the same tasks manually with Supermicro tools.
When making a server purchase, a vendor’s associated management products are critical to protect data, support a more sustainable environment, and to ease the maintenance of systems. Our tests and research showed that the Dell management portfolio for PowerEdge servers offered more features to help organizations meet these goals than the comparable Supermicro management products.
Scale up your storage with higher-performing Dell APEX Block Storage for AWS ...Principled Technologies
In our tests, Dell APEX Block Storage for AWS outperformed similarly configured solutions from Vendor A, achieving more IOPS, better throughput, and more consistent performance on both NVMe-supported configurations and configurations backed by Elastic Block Store (EBS) alone.
Dell APEX Block Storage for AWS supports a full NVMe backed configuration, but Vendor A doesn’t—its solution uses EBS for storage capacity and NVMe as an extended read cache—which means APEX Block Storage for AWS can deliver faster storage performance.
Scale up your storage with higher-performing Dell APEX Block Storage for AWSPrincipled Technologies
Dell APEX Block Storage for AWS offered stronger and more consistent storage performance for better business agility than a Vendor A solution
Conclusion
Enterprises desiring the flexibility and convenience of the cloud for their block storage workloads can find fast-performing solutions with the enterprise storage features they’re used to in on-premises infrastructure by selecting Dell APEX Block Storage for AWS.
Our hands-on tests showed that compared to the Vendor A solution, Dell APEX Block Storage for AWS offered stronger, more consistent storage performance in both NVMe-supported and EBS-backed configurations. Using NVMe-supported configurations, Dell APEX Block Storage for AWS achieved 4.7x the random read IOPS and 5.1x the throughput on sequential read operations per node vs. Vendor A. In our EBS-backed comparison, Dell APEX Block Storage for AWS offered 2.2x the throughput per node on sequential read operations vs. Vendor A.
Plus, the ability to scale beyond three nodes—up to 512 storage nodes with capacity of up to 8 PBs—enables Dell APEX Block Storage for AWS to help ensure performance and capacity as your team plans for the future.
Get in and stay in the productivity zone with the HP Z2 G9 Tower WorkstationPrincipled Technologies
We compared CPU performance and noise output of an HP Z2 G9 Tower Workstation in High Performance Mode to Dell Precision 3660 and 5860 tower workstations in optimized performance modes
Conclusion
HP Z2 G9 Tower Workstation users can change the BIOS settings to dial in the performance mode that best suits their needs: High Performance Mode, Performance Mode, or Quiet Mode. In good
news for both creative and technical professionals, we found that an Intel Core i9-13900 processor-powered HP Z2 G9 Tower Workstation set to High Performance mode received higher CPU-based benchmark scores than both a similarly configured Dell Precision 3660 and a Dell Precision 5860 equipped with an Intel Xeon w5-2455x processor. Plus, the HP Z2 G9 Tower Workstation was quieter while running CPU-intensive Cinebench 2024 and SPECapc for Solidworks 2022 workloads than both Dell Precision tower workstations. This means HP Z2 G9 Tower Workstation users who prize performance over everything else can do so without sacrificing a quiet workspace.
Open up new possibilities with higher transactional database performance from...Principled Technologies
In our PostgreSQL tests, R7i instances boosted performance over R6i instances with previous-gen processors
If you use the open-source PostgreSQL database to run your critical business operations, you have many cloud options from which to choose. While many of these instances can do the job, some can deliver stronger performance, which can mean getting a greater return on your cloud investment.
We conducted hands-on testing with the HammerDB TPROC-C benchmark to see how the PostgreSQL performance of Amazon EC2 R7i instances, enabled by 4th Gen Intel Xeon Scalable processors, stacked up to that of R6i instances with previous-generation processors. We learned that small, medium-sized, and large R7i instances with the newer processors delivered better OLTP performance, with improvements as high as 13.8 percent. By choosing the R7i instances, your organization has the potential to support more users, deliver a better experience to those users, and even lower your cloud operating expenditures by requiring fewer instances to get the job done.
Building Production Ready Search Pipelines with Spark and MilvusZilliz
Spark is the widely used ETL tool for processing, indexing and ingesting data to serving stack for search. Milvus is the production-ready open-source vector database. In this talk we will show how to use Spark to process unstructured data to extract vector representations, and push the vectors to Milvus vector database for search serving.
In the rapidly evolving landscape of technologies, XML continues to play a vital role in structuring, storing, and transporting data across diverse systems. The recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) present new methodologies for enhancing XML development workflows, introducing efficiency, automation, and intelligent capabilities. This presentation will outline the scope and perspective of utilizing AI in XML development. The potential benefits and the possible pitfalls will be highlighted, providing a balanced view of the subject.
We will explore the capabilities of AI in understanding XML markup languages and autonomously creating structured XML content. Additionally, we will examine the capacity of AI to enrich plain text with appropriate XML markup. Practical examples and methodological guidelines will be provided to elucidate how AI can be effectively prompted to interpret and generate accurate XML markup.
Further emphasis will be placed on the role of AI in developing XSLT, or schemas such as XSD and Schematron. We will address the techniques and strategies adopted to create prompts for generating code, explaining code, or refactoring the code, and the results achieved.
The discussion will extend to how AI can be used to transform XML content. In particular, the focus will be on the use of AI XPath extension functions in XSLT, Schematron, Schematron Quick Fixes, or for XML content refactoring.
The presentation aims to deliver a comprehensive overview of AI usage in XML development, providing attendees with the necessary knowledge to make informed decisions. Whether you’re at the early stages of adopting AI or considering integrating it in advanced XML development, this presentation will cover all levels of expertise.
By highlighting the potential advantages and challenges of integrating AI with XML development tools and languages, the presentation seeks to inspire thoughtful conversation around the future of XML development. We’ll not only delve into the technical aspects of AI-powered XML development but also discuss practical implications and possible future directions.
Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1DianaGray10
This session provides introduction to UiPath Communication Mining, importance and platform overview. You will acquire a good understand of the phases in Communication Mining as we go over the platform with you. Topics covered:
• Communication Mining Overview
• Why is it important?
• How can it help today’s business and the benefits
• Phases in Communication Mining
• Demo on Platform overview
• Q/A
Removing Uninteresting Bytes in Software FuzzingAftab Hussain
Imagine a world where software fuzzing, the process of mutating bytes in test seeds to uncover hidden and erroneous program behaviors, becomes faster and more effective. A lot depends on the initial seeds, which can significantly dictate the trajectory of a fuzzing campaign, particularly in terms of how long it takes to uncover interesting behaviour in your code. We introduce DIAR, a technique designed to speedup fuzzing campaigns by pinpointing and eliminating those uninteresting bytes in the seeds. Picture this: instead of wasting valuable resources on meaningless mutations in large, bloated seeds, DIAR removes the unnecessary bytes, streamlining the entire process.
In this work, we equipped AFL, a popular fuzzer, with DIAR and examined two critical Linux libraries -- Libxml's xmllint, a tool for parsing xml documents, and Binutil's readelf, an essential debugging and security analysis command-line tool used to display detailed information about ELF (Executable and Linkable Format). Our preliminary results show that AFL+DIAR does not only discover new paths more quickly but also achieves higher coverage overall. This work thus showcases how starting with lean and optimized seeds can lead to faster, more comprehensive fuzzing campaigns -- and DIAR helps you find such seeds.
- These are slides of the talk given at IEEE International Conference on Software Testing Verification and Validation Workshop, ICSTW 2022.
For the full video of this presentation, please visit: https://www.edge-ai-vision.com/2024/06/building-and-scaling-ai-applications-with-the-nx-ai-manager-a-presentation-from-network-optix/
Robin van Emden, Senior Director of Data Science at Network Optix, presents the “Building and Scaling AI Applications with the Nx AI Manager,” tutorial at the May 2024 Embedded Vision Summit.
In this presentation, van Emden covers the basics of scaling edge AI solutions using the Nx tool kit. He emphasizes the process of developing AI models and deploying them globally. He also showcases the conversion of AI models and the creation of effective edge AI pipelines, with a focus on pre-processing, model conversion, selecting the appropriate inference engine for the target hardware and post-processing.
van Emden shows how Nx can simplify the developer’s life and facilitate a rapid transition from concept to production-ready applications.He provides valuable insights into developing scalable and efficient edge AI solutions, with a strong focus on practical implementation.
Why You Should Replace Windows 11 with Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 for enhanced perfor...SOFTTECHHUB
The choice of an operating system plays a pivotal role in shaping our computing experience. For decades, Microsoft's Windows has dominated the market, offering a familiar and widely adopted platform for personal and professional use. However, as technological advancements continue to push the boundaries of innovation, alternative operating systems have emerged, challenging the status quo and offering users a fresh perspective on computing.
One such alternative that has garnered significant attention and acclaim is Nitrux Linux 3.5.0, a sleek, powerful, and user-friendly Linux distribution that promises to redefine the way we interact with our devices. With its focus on performance, security, and customization, Nitrux Linux presents a compelling case for those seeking to break free from the constraints of proprietary software and embrace the freedom and flexibility of open-source computing.
Driving Business Innovation: Latest Generative AI Advancements & Success StorySafe Software
Are you ready to revolutionize how you handle data? Join us for a webinar where we’ll bring you up to speed with the latest advancements in Generative AI technology and discover how leveraging FME with tools from giants like Google Gemini, Amazon, and Microsoft OpenAI can supercharge your workflow efficiency.
During the hour, we’ll take you through:
Guest Speaker Segment with Hannah Barrington: Dive into the world of dynamic real estate marketing with Hannah, the Marketing Manager at Workspace Group. Hear firsthand how their team generates engaging descriptions for thousands of office units by integrating diverse data sources—from PDF floorplans to web pages—using FME transformers, like OpenAIVisionConnector and AnthropicVisionConnector. This use case will show you how GenAI can streamline content creation for marketing across the board.
Ollama Use Case: Learn how Scenario Specialist Dmitri Bagh has utilized Ollama within FME to input data, create custom models, and enhance security protocols. This segment will include demos to illustrate the full capabilities of FME in AI-driven processes.
Custom AI Models: Discover how to leverage FME to build personalized AI models using your data. Whether it’s populating a model with local data for added security or integrating public AI tools, find out how FME facilitates a versatile and secure approach to AI.
We’ll wrap up with a live Q&A session where you can engage with our experts on your specific use cases, and learn more about optimizing your data workflows with AI.
This webinar is ideal for professionals seeking to harness the power of AI within their data management systems while ensuring high levels of customization and security. Whether you're a novice or an expert, gain actionable insights and strategies to elevate your data processes. Join us to see how FME and AI can revolutionize how you work with data!
Essentials of Automations: The Art of Triggers and Actions in FMESafe Software
In this second installment of our Essentials of Automations webinar series, we’ll explore the landscape of triggers and actions, guiding you through the nuances of authoring and adapting workspaces for seamless automations. Gain an understanding of the full spectrum of triggers and actions available in FME, empowering you to enhance your workspaces for efficient automation.
We’ll kick things off by showcasing the most commonly used event-based triggers, introducing you to various automation workflows like manual triggers, schedules, directory watchers, and more. Plus, see how these elements play out in real scenarios.
Whether you’re tweaking your current setup or building from the ground up, this session will arm you with the tools and insights needed to transform your FME usage into a powerhouse of productivity. Join us to discover effective strategies that simplify complex processes, enhancing your productivity and transforming your data management practices with FME. Let’s turn complexity into clarity and make your workspaces work wonders!
Programming Foundation Models with DSPy - Meetup SlidesZilliz
Prompting language models is hard, while programming language models is easy. In this talk, I will discuss the state-of-the-art framework DSPy for programming foundation models with its powerful optimizers and runtime constraint system.
How to Get CNIC Information System with Paksim Ga.pptxdanishmna97
Pakdata Cf is a groundbreaking system designed to streamline and facilitate access to CNIC information. This innovative platform leverages advanced technology to provide users with efficient and secure access to their CNIC details.
Maruthi Prithivirajan, Head of ASEAN & IN Solution Architecture, Neo4j
Get an inside look at the latest Neo4j innovations that enable relationship-driven intelligence at scale. Learn more about the newest cloud integrations and product enhancements that make Neo4j an essential choice for developers building apps with interconnected data and generative AI.
Sudheer Mechineni, Head of Application Frameworks, Standard Chartered Bank
Discover how Standard Chartered Bank harnessed the power of Neo4j to transform complex data access challenges into a dynamic, scalable graph database solution. This keynote will cover their journey from initial adoption to deploying a fully automated, enterprise-grade causal cluster, highlighting key strategies for modelling organisational changes and ensuring robust disaster recovery. Learn how these innovations have not only enhanced Standard Chartered Bank’s data infrastructure but also positioned them as pioneers in the banking sector’s adoption of graph technology.
HCL Notes und Domino Lizenzkostenreduzierung in der Welt von DLAUpanagenda
Webinar Recording: https://www.panagenda.com/webinars/hcl-notes-und-domino-lizenzkostenreduzierung-in-der-welt-von-dlau/
DLAU und die Lizenzen nach dem CCB- und CCX-Modell sind für viele in der HCL-Community seit letztem Jahr ein heißes Thema. Als Notes- oder Domino-Kunde haben Sie vielleicht mit unerwartet hohen Benutzerzahlen und Lizenzgebühren zu kämpfen. Sie fragen sich vielleicht, wie diese neue Art der Lizenzierung funktioniert und welchen Nutzen sie Ihnen bringt. Vor allem wollen Sie sicherlich Ihr Budget einhalten und Kosten sparen, wo immer möglich. Das verstehen wir und wir möchten Ihnen dabei helfen!
Wir erklären Ihnen, wie Sie häufige Konfigurationsprobleme lösen können, die dazu führen können, dass mehr Benutzer gezählt werden als nötig, und wie Sie überflüssige oder ungenutzte Konten identifizieren und entfernen können, um Geld zu sparen. Es gibt auch einige Ansätze, die zu unnötigen Ausgaben führen können, z. B. wenn ein Personendokument anstelle eines Mail-Ins für geteilte Mailboxen verwendet wird. Wir zeigen Ihnen solche Fälle und deren Lösungen. Und natürlich erklären wir Ihnen das neue Lizenzmodell.
Nehmen Sie an diesem Webinar teil, bei dem HCL-Ambassador Marc Thomas und Gastredner Franz Walder Ihnen diese neue Welt näherbringen. Es vermittelt Ihnen die Tools und das Know-how, um den Überblick zu bewahren. Sie werden in der Lage sein, Ihre Kosten durch eine optimierte Domino-Konfiguration zu reduzieren und auch in Zukunft gering zu halten.
Diese Themen werden behandelt
- Reduzierung der Lizenzkosten durch Auffinden und Beheben von Fehlkonfigurationen und überflüssigen Konten
- Wie funktionieren CCB- und CCX-Lizenzen wirklich?
- Verstehen des DLAU-Tools und wie man es am besten nutzt
- Tipps für häufige Problembereiche, wie z. B. Team-Postfächer, Funktions-/Testbenutzer usw.
- Praxisbeispiele und Best Practices zum sofortigen Umsetzen
AI 101: An Introduction to the Basics and Impact of Artificial IntelligenceIndexBug
Imagine a world where machines not only perform tasks but also learn, adapt, and make decisions. This is the promise of Artificial Intelligence (AI), a technology that's not just enhancing our lives but revolutionizing entire industries.
AI 101: An Introduction to the Basics and Impact of Artificial Intelligence
VMmark 2.5.2 virtualization performance of the Dell Storage SC4020 array
1. AUGUST 2014
A PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES TEST REPORT
Commissioned by Dell
VMMARK 2.5.2 VIRTUALIZATION PERFORMANCE OF
DELL STORAGE SC4020 ARRAY
The efficiency of virtual machines (VMs) in data centers depends heavily on
storage. Embracing the speed that solid-state drives (SSDs) offer over traditional hard
disk drives (HDDs) allows organizations to run more VMs for increased levels of
virtualized workloads leveraging the same infrastructure. However, multiple VMs
sending input/output (I/O) streams to storage can decrease performance and increase
latency, which negatively affects end-user applications.
Measuring and analyzing the storage performance of a virtualized environment
can decrease the risk of latency bottlenecks but can be challenging. VMware VMmark
2.5.2 is a benchmark that measures the performance of virtual environments and
exercises all layers of the virtualization stack. In addition to running workloads on the
VMs, VMmark integrates VMware platform-level features such as vMotion® and Storage
vMotion® into its testing. VMmark expresses scores in terms of tiles; a tile consists of
eight VMs that include database servers, Web servers, mail servers, and standby
servers.
In the Principled Technologies labs, the Dell Storage SC4020 array, paired with a
cluster of Dell PowerEdge R620 servers, supported 30 VMmark tiles to total 240 running
VMs, and achieved a score of 31.35@30 tiles. This score indicates that the Dell Storage
SC4020 array can simultaneously handle multiple virtualized applications and hypervisor
operations while maintaining a strong level of performance. The SC4020 can provide the
benefits of increased virtualized workloads supported by SSDs without serious
detriment to storage performance.
2. A Principled Technologies test report 2VMmark 2.5.2 virtualization performance of the Dell Storage
SC4020 array
WHAT WE TESTED
Dell Storage SC4020 10GbE iSCSI storage array paired with Dell PowerEdge R620 servers
The Dell Storage SC4020 is a Flash-optimized solution designed to provide high-
performance and low-latency. The 2U Fibre Channel SAN storage array features up to 24
internal drives slots and can additionally support up to 96 external slots, allowing for up
to 408 TB of total storage. According to Dell, it offers the benefits of enterprise-class
storage for small- to mid-sized deployments. To learn more about the Dell Storage
SC4020, visit www.dell.com/us/business/p/dell-compellent-sc4020/pd.
As our goal was to discover the capabilities of the storage, we used six Dell
PowerEdge R620 servers in a cluster. By splitting the workload responsibilities among
the R620 servers, we achieved a score of 31.35@30 tiles.
VMmark 2.5.2
We selected VMmark 2.5.2 to measure the performance of the Dell Storage
SC4020 array. To compare platforms for virtualization, users need meaningful and
accurate metrics. Synthetic benchmarks developed to measure performance in non-
virtualized environments work by exercising one or more of the underlying hardware
resources. However, they can be less helpful in demonstrating the scalability of virtual
environments supporting multiple simultaneous workloads.
Some multi-workload server consolidation benchmarks, such as VMware
VMmark 1.1, measure single-host performance in virtualized environments. However,
typical server usage is evolving as technological advances enable easier virtualization of
bursty and heavy workloads, dynamic virtual machine relocation, dynamic virtual disk
relocation, and the automation of many provisioning and administrative tasks across
large-scale multi-host environments. Now, the underlying infrastructure operations may
generate some stress on CPU, network, disk, and memory subsystems. Application
performance also depends on effectively balancing load across multiple hosts. To be
useful in this environment, a benchmark needs to look at both user-centric application
performance and overall platform performance.
VMware VMmark 2.5.2, which has become an industry standard, meets these
criteria. In addition to using this unique benchmark approach, VMware maintains very
strict standards for execution and publication.
3. A Principled Technologies test report 3VMmark 2.5.2 virtualization performance of the Dell Storage
SC4020 array
THE DELL STORAGE SC SERIES & VMWARE COMBINATION
In the past, lack of integration between the hypervisor and the underlying
storage infrastructure prevented virtualized servers from taking full advantage of the
data protection and performance features of enterprise-class storage. Thanks to
VMware vSphere Storage APIs (VAAI), this is no longer the case. Dell Storage SC Series
arrays fully support VAAI, and as such, all of their capabilities are integrated into the
VMware infrastructure environment.
According to Dell, the SC4020 array delivers the following features and
management capabilities, all of which are compatible with VMware environments:
Flash optimization. SC Series arrays are built to leverage SSDs for pure Flash
and hybrid solutions for better performance.
Write-layer performance improvements. All writes are directed to Tier 1
drives at RAID 10 performance levels, which can speed up performance.
Auto-tiering efficiency. Data written at RAID 10 is automatically converted
to RAID 5 to save Tier 1 space without hurting performance.
Automated RAID provisioning. Virtual RAID pools provision automatically
when drives are changed to ease the management burden.
Integrated NAS. The SC4020 integrates fully with Dell Storage FS8600.
Dell SC Storage, like VMware, is built upon a virtualization engine. VMware is
built to virtualize guest operating systems while Dell Storage Center OS virtualizes the
storage within a Dell SC Series array. This virtualization engine allows Dell to implement
enterprise features such as Automatic Tiering, not only between disk tiers, but also
between RAID types by intelligently placing data on the right disk tier at the right RAID
type to maximize the efficiency and performance. This virtualized architecture allows for
additional enterprise SAN technologies such as thin provisioning, thin writes, thin
clones, and space-efficient snapshots. In addition, Dell has many VMware integrations
to simplify operations for both VMware administrators and storage administrators.
These include vCenter Operations Manager Solution Pack for Dell to gain deep storage
analytics, vCenter Plugins to manage storage from the native and Web clients, VASA
integration to assist with VM data placement, VAAI integrations to boost performance
and efficiency, and a Site Recovery Manager Adapter to ease disaster-recovery planning
and execution. Storage administrators can also easily view or create datastores for the
VMware environment by just connecting the Dell Storage Enterprise Manager to the
vCenter Infrastructure.
4. A Principled Technologies test report 4VMmark 2.5.2 virtualization performance of the Dell Storage
SC4020 array
EASE OF MANAGEMENT
Dell Compellent Enterprise Manager provides tools for administrators to have a
high-level view of the storage system, while providing the flexibility to make granular
changes as needed.1
Figure 1 depicts the Enterprise Manager UI, where administrators
can manage the SAN and to monitor it for any issues.
Figure 1: Monitoring
the SAN using
Compellent
Enterprise Manager.
OUR TESTING
VMmark is a benchmarking tool that measures the performance and scalability
of real-world applications running in virtualized environments. It is designed to measure
virtual datacenter performance accurately and reliably using predefined tiles, or sets of
VMs, and is used to compare the performance of different hardware and virtualization
configurations. To successfully support a tile, acceptable QoS levels must be met, and
scores are given based on the number of operations or transactions the multiple
applications are able to complete during the test.
A VMmark tile is composed of the following:
A virtual Microsoft Exchange Server 2007 with 1,000 heavy profile users
Two Olio virtual machines (Olio Web and Olio Database) that simulate a Web
2.0 application focused and social networking and events
1
For more information on Dell Compellent Enterprise Manager, see
www.dell.com/downloads/emea/products/pvaul/dell_compellent_management_suite_en.pdf.
5. A Principled Technologies test report 5VMmark 2.5.2 virtualization performance of the Dell Storage
SC4020 array
Four DVD Store Version 2 (DS2) virtual machines (three DS2 Web servers and
one DS2 database) that simulate an E-commerce application
One virtual Windows Server 2003 that serves as a standby machine
In addition to running the virtualized applications, VMmark also performs the
following tasks during a test:
Virtual machine cloning and deployment
Dynamic virtual machine relocation using vMotion
Dynamic Storage Relocation using Storage vMotion
Automated virtual machine load balancing
To carry out the VMmark testing, we downloaded the benchmark from
www.vmware.com/products/vmmark/. We followed the test directions in the VMware
VMmark Benchmarking Guide (VMmark_Benchmarking_Guide_2.5.2.pdf), included with
the download of VMmark 2.5.2 made publicly available on February 12, 2014. We used
the guide’s instructions to build the mail server, standby, and deploy template VMs
from scratch. For the Oliodb, OlioWeb, DS2DB, and DS2Web VMs, we used the VMmark
prebuilt templates.
Learn more about VMmark at
www.vmware.com/products/vmmark/overview.html.
ANALYZING THE RESULTS
As Figure 2 shows, the Dell Storage SC4020 array offered consistent operations
per second throughout the run, averaging 43,225 IOPS. VMmark provides a persistent
load on the storage, and as Figure 2 shows, the storage was able to handle it well.
Figure 2: I/O operations
per second during the
VMmark run.
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
0:00 0:15 0:30 0:45 1:00 1:15 1:30 1:45 2:00
Time (hours:minutes)
IOPS
6. A Principled Technologies test report 6VMmark 2.5.2 virtualization performance of the Dell Storage
SC4020 array
In addition to consistent level of IOPS, the Dell Storage SC4020 array
demonstrated acceptably low latencies, with latencies averaging around 3 ms through
the test run and experiencing peaks of only 8 to 10 ms. With lower latency from the
SC4020, applications have lower wait times for retrieving data. The latency during the
run was consistently below four milliseconds, spiking only during vMotion bursts.
Figure 3: Latency for the
Dell Storage SC2040
during the VMmark run.
For a detailed look at our hardware configuration, see Appendix A. See
Appendix B for our test bed diagram and Appendix C for detailed VMmark 2.5.2 results.
CONCLUSION
The Dell Storage SC4020 array, paired with a cluster of Dell PowerEdge M620
servers, ran 30 VMmark tiles totaling 240 running VMs, and achieved a score of
31.35@30 tiles. This performance, along with its value and ease of management, make
the Dell Storage SC4020 array an excellent investment.
7. A Principled Technologies test report 7VMmark 2.5.2 virtualization performance of the Dell Storage
SC4020 array
APPENDIX A – STORAGE DISCLOSURE AND SYSTEM CONFIGURATION
Figure 4 presents detailed configuration information about the servers we used in testing.
System
Dell PowerEdge R620
(servers under test)
Dell PowerEdge M620
(virtual client hosts)
Enclosure /chassis
Blade enclosure/chassis N/A
Dell PowerEdge M1000e Blade
Enclosure with 2x MXL 10/40Gbe and
4x Force 10 XML 10/40GbE switch
General
Number of processor packages 2 2
Number of cores per processor 12 8
Number of hardware threads per core 2 2
CPU
Vendor Intel® Intel
Name Xeon® Xeon
Model number E5-2695 v2 E5-2660
Socket type LGA2011 LGA2011
Core frequency (GHz) 2.40 2.20
Bus frequency 8.0 GT/s 8.0 GT/s
L1 cache 32 KB + 32 KB 32 KB + 32 KB
L2 cache 256 KB (per core) 256 KB (per core)
L3 cache 20 MB 20 MB
Platform
Vendor and model Dell PowerEdge R620 Dell PowerEdge M620
BIOS name and version Dell 2.2.2 Dell 2.2.7
BIOS settings Default Default
Memory module(s)
Total RAM in system (GB) 384 32
Vendor and model number Hynix® HMT42GR7MFR4C-PB Hynix HMT42GR7MFR4C-PB
Type PC3-12800R PC3-12800R
Speed (MHz) 1,600 1,600
Speed running in the system (MHz) 1,600 1,600
Size (GB) 16 16
Number of RAM module(s) 24 2
Rank Dual Dual
OS/hypervisor
Name VMware ESXi 5.5.0 VMware ESXi 5.5.0
Build number 1881737 1746018
File system VMFS VMFS
Language English English
RAID controller
Vendor and model number PERC H710P Mini PERC H310 Mini
8. A Principled Technologies test report 8VMmark 2.5.2 virtualization performance of the Dell Storage
SC4020 array
System
Dell PowerEdge R620
(servers under test)
Dell PowerEdge M620
(virtual client hosts)
Hard drives
Vendor and model number Dell MBF2600RC Dell MBF2600RC
Number of drives 2 2
Size (GB) 600 600
Type SAS SAS
Network adapter
Vendor and model number
Broadcom® NetXtreme® II BCM57800
10GB
Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM57810
10GB
Number of ports 2 2
Type Integrated Integrated
Ethernet adapter B
Vendor and model number
Broadcom® NetXtreme® II BCM57810
10GB
Intel 82599EB 10GB
Number of ports 2 2
Type PCIe card Mezzanine card
Ethernet adapter C
Vendor and model number
Broadcom® NetXtreme® II BCM57800
1GB
Intel 82599EB 10GB
Number of ports 2 2
Type Integrated Mezzanine card
Figure 4: System configuration information for our test servers.
Figure 5 provides configuration information about the Dell Storage SC4020 array we used in our tests.
Storage array Dell Storage SC4020
Number of storage shelves 1 x 24 disks enclosure
Number of storage controllers 2
Firmware revision 6.5.2.8
Disk model number 12 x LB406S
Disk size (GB) 372
Disk type SAS SSD
Disk model number 12 x LB1606R
Disk size (TB) 1.46
Disk type SAS SSD
Figure 5: Detailed configuration information for the storage array.
9. A Principled Technologies test report 9VMmark 2.5.2 virtualization performance of the Dell Storage
SC4020 array
APPENDIX B – TEST BED CONFIGURATION
Figure 6 shows how we set up the test configuration.
Figure 6: Configuration of our test bed.
10. A Principled Technologies test report 10VMmark 2.5.2 virtualization performance of the Dell Storage
SC4020 array
APPENDIX C – VMMARK 2.5.2 DETAILED RESULTS
VMware® VMmark® V2.5.2 Results
Vendor and Hardware Platform: Dell
PowerEdge R620
Virtualization Platform: VMware ESXi 5.5.0
Build 1881737
VMware vCenter Server 5.5.0 Build 1750787
VMmark V2.5 Score =
31.35 @ 30 Tiles
Number of Hosts: 6 Uniform Hosts [yes/no]: yes
Total sockets/cores/threads in test:
12/144/288
Tested By: Principled Technologies Test Date: [08-21-2014]
Performance Section
Performance
Configuration Section
Configuration
Notes Section
Notes for Workload
Performance
mailserver olio dvdstoreA dvdstoreB dvdstoreC
TILE_0
Actua
l
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS GM
p0
328.2
5
0.99
120.4
2
4757.4
8
1.03 67.25
3316.7
5
1.51 99.46
2313.2
0
1.52
111.3
6
1623.4
7
1.53
119.2
2
1.2
9
p1
325.2
0
0.98
137.2
5
4754.6
8
1.02 70.97
3123.7
5
1.42
111.1
9
2332.9
7
1.54
122.9
2
1655.1
7
1.56
133.8
5
1.2
8
p2
328.0
5
0.99
149.2
5
4750.4
3
1.02 78.33
3058.5
5
1.39
115.4
8
2098.5
7
1.38
131.0
8
1530.4
2
1.45
141.2
9
1.2
3
TILE_1
Actua
l
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS GM
p0
327.0
0
0.99
126.7
5
4774.0
5
1.03 68.42
3295.4
5
1.50
100.1
5
2440.7
0
1.61
107.4
6
1730.9
7
1.64
115.8
0
1.3
2
p1
328.7
0
1.00
147.7
5
4772.7
0
1.03 76.67
3203.2
8
1.46
105.1
5
2308.7
2
1.52
117.8
4
1715.2
5
1.62
125.6
0
1.3
0
p2
327.7
5
0.99
158.2
5
4757.8
0
1.03 81.75
3141.4
0
1.43
109.8
8
2170.3
5
1.43
123.7
7
1505.4
0
1.42
135.0
2
1.2
4
TILE_2
Actua
l
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS GM
p0 327.9 0.99 118.7 4759.9 1.03 63.34 3411.2 1.55 94.02 2554.7 1.68 104.3 1896.9 1.79 106.1 1.3
11. A Principled Technologies test report 11VMmark 2.5.2 virtualization performance of the Dell Storage
SC4020 array
8 5 8 8 8 0 2 6 7
p1
331.4
5
1.00
141.5
0
4757.9
5
1.03 70.90
3413.2
2
1.55 93.09
2393.4
0
1.58
104.1
6
1779.9
5
1.68
109.3
3
1.3
3
p2
326.5
7
0.99
155.0
0
4759.7
7
1.03 72.85
3311.9
7
1.51 98.51
2330.4
0
1.53
108.7
9
1655.0
0
1.56
114.4
5
1.3
0
TILE_3
Actua
l
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS GM
p0
321.1
2
0.97
123.2
8
4744.7
7
1.02 70.73
3307.1
5
1.50
100.9
8
2370.6
8
1.56
114.0
1
1774.8
5
1.68
120.8
1
1.3
1
p1
326.1
0
0.99
147.2
5
4754.6
5
1.02 76.22
3327.0
7
1.51 97.72
2334.3
2
1.54
108.3
5
1636.7
2
1.55
116.7
4
1.2
9
p2
324.0
7
0.98
161.2
5
4759.0
7
1.03 81.90
3185.8
0
1.45
106.1
0
2305.1
0
1.52
117.3
5
1648.8
5
1.56
124.4
5
1.2
8
TILE_4
Actua
l
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS GM
p0
326.3
2
0.99
138.5
0
4765.3
5
1.03 76.65
3239.1
2
1.47
104.3
4
2327.2
5
1.53
117.2
7
1655.4
0
1.56
125.2
2
1.2
9
p1
326.3
2
0.99
155.7
5
4743.0
5
1.02 84.97
3252.5
3
1.48
101.5
5
2289.6
5
1.51
112.2
9
1621.2
5
1.53
118.6
4
1.2
8
p2
331.6
0
1.00
166.9
3
4769.1
2
1.03 82.72
3184.6
2
1.45
106.3
7
2310.3
8
1.52
117.4
3
1712.4
2
1.62
125.4
1
1.3
0
TILE_5
Actua
l
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS GM
p0
326.1
2
0.99
134.7
5
4761.7
7
1.03 69.20
3266.9
3
1.49
102.5
3
2350.8
0
1.55
115.6
5
1667.1
2
1.58
124.0
4
1.3
0
p1
329.8
5
1.00
155.7
5
4751.2
3
1.02 75.69
3339.2
0
1.52 96.95
2450.4
5
1.61
105.8
5
1738.6
0
1.64
113.5
6
1.3
3
p2
324.5
7
0.98
164.0
0
4763.1
8
1.03 77.41
3233.0
3
1.47
103.3
6
2255.2
0
1.49
115.8
8
1662.7
0
1.57
123.2
3
1.2
8
TILE_6
Actua
l
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS GM
p0
322.1
5
0.98
122.3
3
4758.3
0
1.03 65.12
3383.3
8
1.54 96.27
2368.8
2
1.56
107.6
4
1668.7
8
1.58
114.8
6
1.3
1
p1
325.1
0
0.98
140.2
0
4774.5
0
1.03 70.04
3483.1
8
1.58 89.64
2538.8
0
1.67 99.08
1903.7
0
1.80
105.2
6
1.3
7
p2
329.9
0
1.00
151.5
0
4763.1
0
1.03 75.00
3301.7
8
1.50
100.4
2
2291.5
7
1.51
112.6
6
1608.4
5
1.52
121.5
5
1.2
9
TILE_7
Actua
l
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS GM
17. A Principled Technologies test report 17VMmark 2.5.2 virtualization performance of the Dell Storage
SC4020 array
Number_Of_Threads 3 3 3
Summary Run_Is_Compliant Turbo_Setting:0
Number_Of_Compliance_Issues(0)* Median_Phase(p1)
Unreviewed_VMmark2_Applications_Score 38.33
Unreviewed_VMmark2_Infrastructure_Score 3.45
Unreviewed_VMmark2_Score 31.35
Configuration
Virtualization Software
Hypervisor Vendor,
Product, Version, and Build /
Availability Date (MM-DD-YYYY)
VMware ESXi 5.5.0 Build 1881737 / 06-10-2014
Datacenter Management Software Vendor,
Product, Version, and Build /
Availability Date (MM-DD-YYYY)
VMware vCenter Server 5.5.0 Build 1750787 / 04-19-2014
Supplemental Software None
Servers
Quantity 6
Server Manufacturer and Model Dell PowerEdge R620
Processor Vendor and Model Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2
Processor Speed (GHz) 2.4
Total Sockets/Total Cores/Total Threads 2 Sockets / 12 Cores / 24 Threads
Primary Cache 32 KB I + 32 KB D on chip per core
Secondary Cache 256KB I+D on chip per core
Other Cache 30MB I+D on chip per core
BIOS Version 2.2.2
Memory Size (in GB, Number of DIMMs) 384, 24 DIMMs
Memory Type and Speed 16GB DIMMs 2Rx4 DDR3-1600MHz Registered ECC
Disk Subsystem Type FC SAN
Number of Disk Controllers 1
Disk Controller
Vendors and Models
Compellent SC4020
18. A Principled Technologies test report 18VMmark 2.5.2 virtualization performance of the Dell Storage
SC4020 array
Number of Host Bus Adapters 1
Host Bus Adapter
Vendors and Models
QLogic QLE2670-CK 16Gbps dual-port fibre channel HBA
Number of Network Controllers 1
Network Controller
Vendors and Models
Broadcom® 10Gbps dual-port NetXtreme® II BCM57810
adapter
Other Hardware None
Other Software
The following drivers were installed as part of the Dell-
customized image for ESXi 5.1:
tg3 - 3.133d.v55.1, bnx2 - 2.2.3t.v55.7, bnx2x - 1.78.28.v55.2,
cnic - 1.78.12.v55.6, cnic-register - 1.78.1.v55.7, bnx2fc -
1.78.16.v55.4, bnx2i - 2.78.11.v55.4, qlnativefc - 1.1.7.0 -
1OEM.550.0.0.1198610, qla4xxx - 634.55.20.0-1vmw, qlcnic -
5.5.164, qlge - v3.00.00.57, igb - 4.2.16.8, ixgbe - 3.18.7iov, lpfc
- 10.0.575.8-1OEM.550.0.0.1198611, elxnet - 10.0.575.7-10EM-
550.0.0.1198611, be2iscsi - 4.6.261.0, mpt2sas -
16.00.01.00.1vmw
Hardware Availability Date (MM-DD-YYYY) 01-16-2014
Software Availability Date (MM-DD-YYYY) 06-10-2014
Network
Network Switch
Vendors and Models
Dell PowerConnect 8024F 10Gbps switch
Network Speed 10Gbps for all traffic
Storage
Array Vendors, Models,
and Firmware Versions
Dell Compellent SC4020, Firmware version 6.5.2.8
Fibre Channel Switch
Vendors and Models
Brocade 6505
Disk Space Used 8,266.5 GB
Array Cache Size 16 GB
Total Number of Physical Disks Used 24
Total Number of Enclosures/Pods/Shelves Used 1
Number of Physical Disks Used per Enclosure/Pod/Shelf 24
Total Number of Storage Groups Used 1
Number of LUNs Used 13
LUN Size and Number of Disks Per LUN Details in section Storage Notes
RAID Type Details in section Storage Notes
19. A Principled Technologies test report 19VMmark 2.5.2 virtualization performance of the Dell Storage
SC4020 array
Number of Members
per RAID Set
Details in section Storage Notes
Disk Vendors, Models, and Speeds
12 x SanDisk LB406S, 372GB SSD
12 x SanDisk LB1606R, 1.46TB SSD
Datacenter Management Server
System Model Dell PowerEdge M620
Processor Vendor
and Model
Intel Xeon E5-2660
Processor Speed (GHz) 2.2 GHz
Total Sockets/Total Cores/Total Threads 2 Sockets / 16 Cores / 32 Threads
Memory 32 GB
Network Controller(s)
Vendors and Models
Broadcom® 10Gbps dual-port NetXtreme® II BCM57810 adapter, 2 x 10GB
dual-port Intel 82599EB adapter
Operating System, Version,
Bitness, and Service Pack
Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise 64-bit (prime client)
VMware ESXi 5.5.0 Build 1881737 (virtual client hosts)
Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise 64-bit (virtual client)
Other Hardware None
Other Software None
Clients
Total Number of Clients / Total
Physical Clients / Total Virtual
Client Hosts
31 / 1 / 6
System Model(s) Dell PowerEdge M620
Processor Vendor(s)
and Model(s)
Intel Xeon E5-2660
Processor Speed(s) (GHz) 2.2 GHz
Total Sockets/Total Cores/Total
Threads
2 Sockets / 16 Cores / 32 Threads
Memory per Physical Client 32 GB (prime client), 64 GB (virtual client hosts)
Network Controller(s)
Vendors and Models
Broadcom® 10Gbps dual-port NetXtreme® II BCM57810 adapter, 2 x 10GB dual-port
Intel 82599EB adapter
Operating System, Version,
Bitness, and Service Pack
Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise 64-bit (prime client)
VMware ESXi 5.5.0 Build 1881737 (virtual client hosts)
Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise 64-bit (virtual client)
Number of Virtual Clients 30
Number of vCPUs Per Virtual 4
20. A Principled Technologies test report 20VMmark 2.5.2 virtualization performance of the Dell Storage
SC4020 array
Client
Number of vMem (GB) Per
Virtual Client
4
Virtual Client Networking Notes None
Virtual Client Storage Notes All clients stored on EqualLogic PS6210X storage array in a single LUN
Other Hardware
Dell PowerEdge M1000e Blade Enclosure with 2x MXL 10/40Gbe and 4x Force 10 XML
10/40GbE switch
Other Software None
Notes for Workload
Virtualization Software Notes
Virtual hardware for all VMs was set to V10
Ethernet adapter type set to vmxnet3 for all VMs (default vmxnet2)
CD and floppy were removed from all VMs (default attached)
Logging was disabled for all VMs (default enabled)
All VMs except standby configured as single virtual socket with multiple cores (default one core per multiple
virtual sockets)
SCSI adapter type PVSCSI used for all Standby VMs (default LSI Logic parallel)
SCSI adapter type PVSCSI used for all MailServer and Linux VMs (default LSI Logic SAS)
VMware tools were version 9344 on all VMs except standby VMs which used version 9227
/adv/Cpu/CoschedCrossCall = 0 (default 1)
/adv/Cpu/HTWholeCoreThreshold = 0 (default 200)
/adv/DataMover/HardwareAcceleratedInit = 0 (default 1)
/adv/DataMover/HardwareAcceleratedMove = 0 (default 1)
/adv/Mem/BalancePeriod = 0 (default 15)
/adv/Mem/SamplePeriod = 0 (default 60)
/adv/Mem/ShareScanGHz = 0 (default 4)
/adv/Misc/TimerMaxHardPeriod = 4000 (default 100000)
/adv/Net/MaxNetifRxQueueLen = 500 (default 100)
/adv/Net/MaxNetifTxQueueLen = 1000 (default 500)
/adv/Net/NetTxCompletionWorldlet = 0 (default 1)
/adv/Irq/IRQRebalancePeriod = 20000 (default 50)
/adv/Irq/BestVcpuRouting = 1 (default 0)
/adv/Numa/LTermFairnessInterval = 0 (default 5)
/adv/Numa/PreferHT = 1 (default 0)
/adv/Numa/MonMigEnable = 0 (default 1)
/adv/Numa/PageMigEnable = 0 (default 1)
/adv/Numa/RebalancePeriod = 60000 (default 2000)
/adv/Numa/SwapLoadEnable = 0 (default 1)
/adv/Numa/SwapLocalityEnable = 0 (default 1)
21. A Principled Technologies test report 21VMmark 2.5.2 virtualization performance of the Dell Storage
SC4020 array
Server Notes
CPU C6 Report disabled (default enabled)
Package C state limit set to C0 (default no limit)
Networking Notes
vSwitch Configuration:
vSwitch1 on vmnic4 (10Gb) for VMotion (vSwitch2 on Host 2)
vSwitch0 on vmnic5 (10Gb) for Service Console, all Standby, Mail, Olio, DS2, and Deploy VMs
Storage Notes
ESX was installed on a two-disk RAID 1 volume from the internal 300GB SAS hard drives in each system under
test.
The Compellent storage array was configured into one RAID 6 storage pool with a hotspare 10K RPM disk.
The storage pool was mapped to all servers.
Storage pool layout:
1 LUN at 3TB, as the transfer volume
1 LUN at 2TB, containing the DS2 DB VMs
1 LUN at 1.6TB, containing the DS Web VMs
1 LUN at 3.3TB, containing the Mailserver VMs
1 LUN at 700GB, containing the Olio DB VMs
1 LUN at 3.6TB, containing the Olio Web VMs
1 LUN at 240GB, containing the standby VMs
4 LUNs at 75GB, containing the Standby source targets
1 LUN at 30GB, containing the Deploy cloning target location
1 LUN at 30GB, containing the Deploy template VMs
Datacenter Management Server Notes
The Datacenter Management Server was a virtual machine configured with 4 vCPU and 12GB RAM on a separate ESXi
host.
Operating System Notes
All Mailservers ran Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise 64-bit
Software Notes
None
Client Notes
Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise 64-bit installed on client virtual machines and updated through
Windows Update
22. A Principled Technologies test report 22VMmark 2.5.2 virtualization performance of the Dell Storage
SC4020 array
Prime client was running Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise 64-bit and VMware vSphere PowerCLI
5.5 Release 2 build 1671586
Prime client ran as a physical client
All other clients ran as virtual machines that were each defined with 4 virtual CPUs, 4GB of memory, 1 vmxnet3
network, and 36GB of disk space
Virtual clients 0-4 were hosted on virtual client host 1
Virtual clients 5-9 were hosted on virtual client host 2
Virtual clients 10-14 were hosted on virtual client host 3
Virtual clients 15-19 were hosted on virtual client host 4
Virtual clients 20-24 were hosted on virtual client host 5
Virtual clients 25-29 were hosted on virtual client host 6
Clients ran with default ESX settings
Other Notes
None
This is a full disclosure report for a VMmark benchmark result. All published VMmark results must be from fully-
compliant tests for which a full disclosure report is publicly available.
For information about VMmark and the rules regarding its usage visit www.vmware.com/products/vmmark.
VMware and VMmark are trademarks or registered trademarks of VMware, Inc. VMware® VMmark® is a product of
VMware, Inc. VMmark utilizes the SPEC Power and Temperature Daemon (SPEC PTDaemon), which is available from
the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation (SPEC®). VMmark results are not SPEC metrics and cannot be
compared to SPEC metrics in any way.
VMware® VMmark® V2.5.2 Results
Vendor and Hardware Platform: Dell
PowerEdge R620
Virtualization Platform: VMware ESXi 5.5.0
Build 1881737
VMware vCenter Server 5.5.0 Build 1750787
VMmark V2.5 Score =
31.35 @ 30 Tiles
Number of Hosts: 6 Uniform Hosts [yes/no]: yes
Total sockets/cores/threads in test:
12/144/288
Tested By: Principled Technologies Test Date: [08-21-2014]
Performance Section
Performance
Configuration Section
Configuration
Notes Section
Notes for Workload
23. A Principled Technologies test report 23VMmark 2.5.2 virtualization performance of the Dell Storage
SC4020 array
Performance
mailserver olio dvdstoreA dvdstoreB dvdstoreC
TILE_0
Actua
l
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS GM
p0
328.2
5
0.99
120.4
2
4757.4
8
1.03 67.25
3316.7
5
1.51 99.46
2313.2
0
1.52
111.3
6
1623.4
7
1.53
119.2
2
1.2
9
p1
325.2
0
0.98
137.2
5
4754.6
8
1.02 70.97
3123.7
5
1.42
111.1
9
2332.9
7
1.54
122.9
2
1655.1
7
1.56
133.8
5
1.2
8
p2
328.0
5
0.99
149.2
5
4750.4
3
1.02 78.33
3058.5
5
1.39
115.4
8
2098.5
7
1.38
131.0
8
1530.4
2
1.45
141.2
9
1.2
3
TILE_1
Actua
l
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS GM
p0
327.0
0
0.99
126.7
5
4774.0
5
1.03 68.42
3295.4
5
1.50
100.1
5
2440.7
0
1.61
107.4
6
1730.9
7
1.64
115.8
0
1.3
2
p1
328.7
0
1.00
147.7
5
4772.7
0
1.03 76.67
3203.2
8
1.46
105.1
5
2308.7
2
1.52
117.8
4
1715.2
5
1.62
125.6
0
1.3
0
p2
327.7
5
0.99
158.2
5
4757.8
0
1.03 81.75
3141.4
0
1.43
109.8
8
2170.3
5
1.43
123.7
7
1505.4
0
1.42
135.0
2
1.2
4
TILE_2
Actua
l
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS GM
p0
327.9
8
0.99
118.7
5
4759.9
8
1.03 63.34
3411.2
8
1.55 94.02
2554.7
8
1.68
104.3
0
1896.9
2
1.79
106.1
6
1.3
7
p1
331.4
5
1.00
141.5
0
4757.9
5
1.03 70.90
3413.2
2
1.55 93.09
2393.4
0
1.58
104.1
6
1779.9
5
1.68
109.3
3
1.3
3
p2
326.5
7
0.99
155.0
0
4759.7
7
1.03 72.85
3311.9
7
1.51 98.51
2330.4
0
1.53
108.7
9
1655.0
0
1.56
114.4
5
1.3
0
TILE_3
Actua
l
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS GM
p0
321.1
2
0.97
123.2
8
4744.7
7
1.02 70.73
3307.1
5
1.50
100.9
8
2370.6
8
1.56
114.0
1
1774.8
5
1.68
120.8
1
1.3
1
p1
326.1
0
0.99
147.2
5
4754.6
5
1.02 76.22
3327.0
7
1.51 97.72
2334.3
2
1.54
108.3
5
1636.7
2
1.55
116.7
4
1.2
9
p2
324.0
7
0.98
161.2
5
4759.0
7
1.03 81.90
3185.8
0
1.45
106.1
0
2305.1
0
1.52
117.3
5
1648.8
5
1.56
124.4
5
1.2
8
TILE_4
Actua
l
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS GM
p0
326.3
2
0.99
138.5
0
4765.3
5
1.03 76.65
3239.1
2
1.47
104.3
4
2327.2
5
1.53
117.2
7
1655.4
0
1.56
125.2
2
1.2
9
24. A Principled Technologies test report 24VMmark 2.5.2 virtualization performance of the Dell Storage
SC4020 array
p1
326.3
2
0.99
155.7
5
4743.0
5
1.02 84.97
3252.5
3
1.48
101.5
5
2289.6
5
1.51
112.2
9
1621.2
5
1.53
118.6
4
1.2
8
p2
331.6
0
1.00
166.9
3
4769.1
2
1.03 82.72
3184.6
2
1.45
106.3
7
2310.3
8
1.52
117.4
3
1712.4
2
1.62
125.4
1
1.3
0
TILE_5
Actua
l
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS GM
p0
326.1
2
0.99
134.7
5
4761.7
7
1.03 69.20
3266.9
3
1.49
102.5
3
2350.8
0
1.55
115.6
5
1667.1
2
1.58
124.0
4
1.3
0
p1
329.8
5
1.00
155.7
5
4751.2
3
1.02 75.69
3339.2
0
1.52 96.95
2450.4
5
1.61
105.8
5
1738.6
0
1.64
113.5
6
1.3
3
p2
324.5
7
0.98
164.0
0
4763.1
8
1.03 77.41
3233.0
3
1.47
103.3
6
2255.2
0
1.49
115.8
8
1662.7
0
1.57
123.2
3
1.2
8
TILE_6
Actua
l
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS GM
p0
322.1
5
0.98
122.3
3
4758.3
0
1.03 65.12
3383.3
8
1.54 96.27
2368.8
2
1.56
107.6
4
1668.7
8
1.58
114.8
6
1.3
1
p1
325.1
0
0.98
140.2
0
4774.5
0
1.03 70.04
3483.1
8
1.58 89.64
2538.8
0
1.67 99.08
1903.7
0
1.80
105.2
6
1.3
7
p2
329.9
0
1.00
151.5
0
4763.1
0
1.03 75.00
3301.7
8
1.50
100.4
2
2291.5
7
1.51
112.6
6
1608.4
5
1.52
121.5
5
1.2
9
TILE_7
Actua
l
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS GM
p0
327.3
2
0.99
132.2
5
4754.1
8
1.02 72.11
3318.1
2
1.51 99.76
2486.3
8
1.64
110.1
0
1773.9
2
1.68
119.6
6
1.3
3
p1
328.9
5
1.00
152.0
0
4766.4
5
1.03 77.35
3166.5
5
1.44
108.6
7
2192.4
0
1.44
122.1
8
1593.0
0
1.51
132.0
5
1.2
6
p2
324.4
8
0.98
163.2
5
4768.3
2
1.03 82.03
3115.5
3
1.42
111.9
0
2164.8
0
1.43
125.3
1
1494.7
5
1.41
136.4
8
1.2
4
TILE_8
Actua
l
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS GM
p0
327.4
8
0.99
123.7
0
4752.0
2
1.02 68.90
3107.6
2
1.41
113.3
3
2190.7
8
1.44
130.4
7
1618.8
5
1.53
138.9
7
1.2
6
p1
328.5
0
0.99
143.7
2
4764.6
8
1.03 69.09
3139.2
0
1.43
109.6
7
2164.1
0
1.43
124.9
7
1494.6
2
1.41
136.2
3
1.2
4
p2
329.5
0
1.00
157.0
0
4759.2
3
1.03 75.98
3001.4
7
1.36
119.8
5
2127.3
5
1.40
135.9
2
1498.1
5
1.42
146.4
6
1.2
3
TILE_9
Actua
l
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS GM
p0 322.2 0.98 137.5 4767.5 1.03 65.58 3258.6 1.48 103.0 2258.7 1.49 116.8 1665.7 1.57 124.2 1.2
25. A Principled Technologies test report 25VMmark 2.5.2 virtualization performance of the Dell Storage
SC4020 array
0 0 7 8 0 2 6 8 6 8
p1
328.0
5
0.99
161.2
5
4761.3
5
1.03 72.68
3218.5
7
1.46
104.4
2
2236.7
8
1.47
118.0
2
1570.7
5
1.48
125.4
8
1.2
7
p2
331.4
0
1.00
176.2
5
4775.7
5
1.03 81.85
3146.1
8
1.43
108.0
8
2280.2
5
1.50
120.7
4
1689.7
2
1.60
129.1
0
1.2
9
TILE_10
Actua
l
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS GM
p0
328.1
5
0.99
138.0
0
4749.8
8
1.02 70.51
3264.5
5
1.48
102.4
7
2274.0
0
1.50
115.1
6
1591.3
0
1.50
123.8
9
1.2
8
p1
327.6
0
0.99
157.7
5
4756.8
8
1.02 73.21
3185.7
8
1.45
107.8
2
2312.8
0
1.52
118.3
3
1621.3
5
1.53
127.9
3
1.2
8
p2
327.2
5
0.99
169.2
5
4761.2
5
1.03 78.89
3205.6
2
1.46
105.1
8
2236.4
0
1.47
117.4
9
1653.4
2
1.56
124.4
1
1.2
8
TILE_11
Actua
l
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS GM
p0
327.6
5
0.99
133.2
5
4765.6
8
1.03 71.95
3317.4
5
1.51 99.41
2323.1
5
1.53
110.9
8
1624.1
7
1.54
119.9
5
1.2
9
p1
325.3
8
0.99
153.0
0
4776.7
0
1.03 72.50
3300.1
0
1.50 99.60
2390.8
5
1.57
110.5
2
1791.5
0
1.69
116.6
0
1.3
2
p2
330.9
5
1.00
156.7
5
4749.8
2
1.02 79.99
3268.3
5
1.49
101.4
8
2271.7
8
1.50
114.3
2
1602.0
3
1.51
120.9
6
1.2
8
TILE_12
Actua
l
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS GM
p0
325.8
2
0.99
164.5
0
4745.0
5
1.02 78.34
3124.8
0
1.42
111.5
9
2258.0
0
1.49
124.0
3
1611.4
7
1.52
132.0
1
1.2
7
p1
324.5
5
0.98
182.5
0
4744.7
3
1.02 80.62
3109.6
0
1.41
111.6
7
2147.1
5
1.41
125.9
9
1594.0
3
1.51
132.7
0
1.2
5
p2
328.1
8
0.99
190.7
5
4750.2
3
1.02 87.55
3035.7
8
1.38
115.9
7
2100.4
7
1.38
130.9
6
1484.0
0
1.40
138.5
8
1.2
2
TILE_13
Actua
l
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS GM
p0
323.4
0
0.98
181.0
7
4741.7
3
1.02 91.41
3208.3
0
1.46
106.4
3
2313.2
8
1.52
119.1
1
1726.6
7
1.63
126.1
4
1.2
9
p1
323.1
2
0.98
197.2
5
4736.6
0
1.02 94.91
3103.4
0
1.41
112.7
9
2149.7
0
1.42
126.6
8
1494.0
3
1.41
137.1
1
1.2
3
p2
325.4
5
0.99
207.5
0
4734.6
5
1.02
102.7
5
3043.8
5
1.38
116.3
0
2185.9
5
1.44
129.7
7
1547.1
5
1.46
138.8
1
1.2
4
TILE_14
Actua
l
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS Actual
Rati
o
QoS GM
30. A Principled Technologies test report 30VMmark 2.5.2 virtualization performance of the Dell Storage
SC4020 array
Datacenter Management Software Vendor,
Product, Version, and Build /
Availability Date (MM-DD-YYYY)
VMware vCenter Server 5.5.0 Build 1750787 / 04-19-2014
Supplemental Software None
Servers
Quantity 6
Server Manufacturer and Model Dell PowerEdge R620
Processor Vendor and Model Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2
Processor Speed (GHz) 2.4
Total Sockets/Total Cores/Total Threads 2 Sockets / 12 Cores / 24 Threads
Primary Cache 32 KB I + 32 KB D on chip per core
Secondary Cache 256KB I+D on chip per core
Other Cache 30MB I+D on chip per core
BIOS Version 2.2.2
Memory Size (in GB, Number of DIMMs) 384, 24 DIMMs
Memory Type and Speed 16GB DIMMs 2Rx4 DDR3-1600MHz Registered ECC
Disk Subsystem Type FC SAN
Number of Disk Controllers 1
Disk Controller
Vendors and Models
Compellent SC4020
Number of Host Bus Adapters 1
Host Bus Adapter
Vendors and Models
QLogic QLE2670-CK 16Gbps dual-port fibre channel HBA
Number of Network Controllers 1
Network Controller
Vendors and Models
Broadcom® 10Gbps dual-port NetXtreme® II BCM57810
adapter
Other Hardware None
Other Software
The following drivers were installed as part of the Dell-
customized image for ESXi 5.1:
tg3 - 3.133d.v55.1, bnx2 - 2.2.3t.v55.7, bnx2x - 1.78.28.v55.2,
cnic - 1.78.12.v55.6, cnic-register - 1.78.1.v55.7, bnx2fc -
1.78.16.v55.4, bnx2i - 2.78.11.v55.4, qlnativefc - 1.1.7.0 -
1OEM.550.0.0.1198610, qla4xxx - 634.55.20.0-1vmw, qlcnic -
5.5.164, qlge - v3.00.00.57, igb - 4.2.16.8, ixgbe - 3.18.7iov, lpfc
- 10.0.575.8-1OEM.550.0.0.1198611, elxnet - 10.0.575.7-10EM-
550.0.0.1198611, be2iscsi - 4.6.261.0, mpt2sas -
16.00.01.00.1vmw
31. A Principled Technologies test report 31VMmark 2.5.2 virtualization performance of the Dell Storage
SC4020 array
Hardware Availability Date (MM-DD-YYYY) 01-16-2014
Software Availability Date (MM-DD-YYYY) 06-10-2014
Network
Network Switch
Vendors and Models
Dell PowerConnect 8024F 10Gbps switch
Network Speed 10Gbps for all traffic
Storage
Array Vendors, Models,
and Firmware Versions
Dell Compellent SC4020, Firmware version 6.5.2.8
Fibre Channel Switch
Vendors and Models
Brocade 6505
Disk Space Used 8,266.5 GB
Array Cache Size 16 GB
Total Number of Physical Disks Used 24
Total Number of Enclosures/Pods/Shelves Used 1
Number of Physical Disks Used per Enclosure/Pod/Shelf 24
Total Number of Storage Groups Used 1
Number of LUNs Used 13
LUN Size and Number of Disks Per LUN Details in section Storage Notes
RAID Type Details in section Storage Notes
Number of Members
per RAID Set
Details in section Storage Notes
Disk Vendors, Models, and Speeds
12 x SanDisk LB406S, 372GB SSD
12 x SanDisk LB1606R, 1.46TB SSD
Datacenter Management Server
System Model Dell PowerEdge M620
Processor Vendor
and Model
Intel Xeon E5-2660
Processor Speed (GHz) 2.2 GHz
Total Sockets/Total Cores/Total Threads 2 Sockets / 16 Cores / 32 Threads
Memory 32 GB
Network Controller(s)
Vendors and Models
Broadcom® 10Gbps dual-port NetXtreme® II BCM57810 adapter, 2 x 10GB
dual-port Intel 82599EB adapter
Operating System, Version,
Bitness, and Service Pack
Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise 64-bit (prime client)
VMware ESXi 5.5.0 Build 1881737 (virtual client hosts)
32. A Principled Technologies test report 32VMmark 2.5.2 virtualization performance of the Dell Storage
SC4020 array
Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise 64-bit (virtual client)
Other Hardware None
Other Software None
Clients
Total Number of Clients / Total
Physical Clients / Total Virtual
Client Hosts
31 / 1 / 6
System Model(s) Dell PowerEdge M620
Processor Vendor(s)
and Model(s)
Intel Xeon E5-2660
Processor Speed(s) (GHz) 2.2 GHz
Total Sockets/Total Cores/Total
Threads
2 Sockets / 16 Cores / 32 Threads
Memory per Physical Client 32 GB (prime client), 64 GB (virtual client hosts)
Network Controller(s)
Vendors and Models
Broadcom® 10Gbps dual-port NetXtreme® II BCM57810 adapter, 2 x 10GB dual-port
Intel 82599EB adapter
Operating System, Version,
Bitness, and Service Pack
Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise 64-bit (prime client)
VMware ESXi 5.5.0 Build 1881737 (virtual client hosts)
Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise 64-bit (virtual client)
Number of Virtual Clients 30
Number of vCPUs Per Virtual
Client
4
Number of vMem (GB) Per
Virtual Client
4
Virtual Client Networking Notes None
Virtual Client Storage Notes All clients stored on EqualLogic PS6210X storage array in a single LUN
Other Hardware
Dell PowerEdge M1000e Blade Enclosure with 2x MXL 10/40Gbe and 4x Force 10 XML
10/40GbE switch
Other Software None
Notes for Workload
Virtualization Software Notes
Virtual hardware for all VMs was set to V10
Ethernet adapter type set to vmxnet3 for all VMs (default vmxnet2)
CD and floppy were removed from all VMs (default attached)
Logging was disabled for all VMs (default enabled)
33. A Principled Technologies test report 33VMmark 2.5.2 virtualization performance of the Dell Storage
SC4020 array
All VMs except standby configured as single virtual socket with multiple cores (default one core per multiple
virtual sockets)
SCSI adapter type PVSCSI used for all Standby VMs (default LSI Logic parallel)
SCSI adapter type PVSCSI used for all MailServer and Linux VMs (default LSI Logic SAS)
VMware tools were version 9344 on all VMs except standby VMs which used version 9227
/adv/Cpu/CoschedCrossCall = 0 (default 1)
/adv/Cpu/HTWholeCoreThreshold = 0 (default 200)
/adv/DataMover/HardwareAcceleratedInit = 0 (default 1)
/adv/DataMover/HardwareAcceleratedMove = 0 (default 1)
/adv/Mem/BalancePeriod = 0 (default 15)
/adv/Mem/SamplePeriod = 0 (default 60)
/adv/Mem/ShareScanGHz = 0 (default 4)
/adv/Misc/TimerMaxHardPeriod = 4000 (default 100000)
/adv/Net/MaxNetifRxQueueLen = 500 (default 100)
/adv/Net/MaxNetifTxQueueLen = 1000 (default 500)
/adv/Net/NetTxCompletionWorldlet = 0 (default 1)
/adv/Irq/IRQRebalancePeriod = 20000 (default 50)
/adv/Irq/BestVcpuRouting = 1 (default 0)
/adv/Numa/LTermFairnessInterval = 0 (default 5)
/adv/Numa/PreferHT = 1 (default 0)
/adv/Numa/MonMigEnable = 0 (default 1)
/adv/Numa/PageMigEnable = 0 (default 1)
/adv/Numa/RebalancePeriod = 60000 (default 2000)
/adv/Numa/SwapLoadEnable = 0 (default 1)
/adv/Numa/SwapLocalityEnable = 0 (default 1)
Server Notes
CPU C6 Report disabled (default enabled)
Package C state limit set to C0 (default no limit)
Networking Notes
vSwitch Configuration:
vSwitch1 on vmnic4 (10Gb) for VMotion (vSwitch2 on Host 2)
vSwitch0 on vmnic5 (10Gb) for Service Console, all Standby, Mail, Olio, DS2, and Deploy VMs
Storage Notes
ESX was installed on a two-disk RAID 1 volume from the internal 300GB SAS hard drives in each system under
test.
The Compellent storage array was configured into one RAID 6 storage pool with a hotspare 10K RPM disk.
The storage pool was mapped to all servers.
Storage pool layout:
1 LUN at 3TB, as the transfer volume
1 LUN at 2TB, containing the DS2 DB VMs
1 LUN at 1.6TB, containing the DS Web VMs
1 LUN at 3.3TB, containing the Mailserver VMs
34. A Principled Technologies test report 34VMmark 2.5.2 virtualization performance of the Dell Storage
SC4020 array
1 LUN at 700GB, containing the Olio DB VMs
1 LUN at 3.6TB, containing the Olio Web VMs
1 LUN at 240GB, containing the standby VMs
4 LUNs at 75GB, containing the Standby source targets
1 LUN at 30GB, containing the Deploy cloning target location
1 LUN at 30GB, containing the Deploy template VMs
Datacenter Management Server Notes
The Datacenter Management Server was a virtual machine configured with 4 vCPU and 12GB RAM on a separate ESXi
host.
Operating System Notes
All Mailservers ran Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise 64-bit
Software Notes
None
Client Notes
Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise 64-bit installed on client virtual machines and updated through
Windows Update
Prime client was running Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise 64-bit and VMware vSphere PowerCLI
5.5 Release 2 build 1671586
Prime client ran as a physical client
All other clients ran as virtual machines that were each defined with 4 virtual CPUs, 4GB of memory, 1 vmxnet3
network, and 36GB of disk space
Virtual clients 0-4 were hosted on virtual client host 1
Virtual clients 5-9 were hosted on virtual client host 2
Virtual clients 10-14 were hosted on virtual client host 3
Virtual clients 15-19 were hosted on virtual client host 4
Virtual clients 20-24 were hosted on virtual client host 5
Virtual clients 25-29 were hosted on virtual client host 6
Clients ran with default ESX settings
Other Notes
None
This is a full disclosure report for a VMmark benchmark result. All published VMmark results must be from fully-
compliant tests for which a full disclosure report is publicly available.
For information about VMmark and the rules regarding its usage visit www.vmware.com/products/vmmark.
35. A Principled Technologies test report 35VMmark 2.5.2 virtualization performance of the Dell Storage
SC4020 array
VMware and VMmark are trademarks or registered trademarks of VMware, Inc. VMware® VMmark® is a product of
VMware, Inc. VMmark utilizes the SPEC Power and Temperature Daemon (SPEC PTDaemon), which is available from
the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation (SPEC®). VMmark results are not SPEC metrics and cannot be
compared to SPEC metrics in any way.
36. A Principled Technologies test report 36VMmark 2.5.2 virtualization performance of the Dell Storage
SC4020 array
ABOUT PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES
Principled Technologies, Inc.
1007 Slater Road, Suite 300
Durham, NC, 27703
www.principledtechnologies.com
We provide industry-leading technology assessment and fact-based
marketing services. We bring to every assignment extensive experience
with and expertise in all aspects of technology testing and analysis, from
researching new technologies, to developing new methodologies, to
testing with existing and new tools.
When the assessment is complete, we know how to present the results to
a broad range of target audiences. We provide our clients with the
materials they need, from market-focused data to use in their own
collateral to custom sales aids, such as test reports, performance
assessments, and white papers. Every document reflects the results of
our trusted independent analysis.
We provide customized services that focus on our clients’ individual
requirements. Whether the technology involves hardware, software, Web
sites, or services, we offer the experience, expertise, and tools to help our
clients assess how it will fare against its competition, its performance, its
market readiness, and its quality and reliability.
Our founders, Mark L. Van Name and Bill Catchings, have worked
together in technology assessment for over 20 years. As journalists, they
published over a thousand articles on a wide array of technology subjects.
They created and led the Ziff-Davis Benchmark Operation, which
developed such industry-standard benchmarks as Ziff Davis Media’s
Winstone and WebBench. They founded and led eTesting Labs, and after
the acquisition of that company by Lionbridge Technologies were the
head and CTO of VeriTest.
Principled Technologies is a registered trademark of Principled Technologies, Inc.
All other product names are the trademarks of their respective owners.
Disclaimer of Warranties; Limitation of Liability:
PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES, INC. HAS MADE REASONABLE EFFORTS TO ENSURE THE ACCURACY AND VALIDITY OF ITS TESTING, HOWEVER,
PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS ANY WARRANTY, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, RELATING TO THE TEST RESULTS AND
ANALYSIS, THEIR ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS OR QUALITY, INCLUDING ANY IMPLIED WARRANTY OF FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
ALL PERSONS OR ENTITIES RELYING ON THE RESULTS OF ANY TESTING DO SO AT THEIR OWN RISK, AND AGREE THAT PRINCIPLED
TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ITS EMPLOYEES AND ITS SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL HAVE NO LIABILITY WHATSOEVER FROM ANY CLAIM OF LOSS OR
DAMAGE ON ACCOUNT OF ANY ALLEGED ERROR OR DEFECT IN ANY TESTING PROCEDURE OR RESULT.
IN NO EVENT SHALL PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES, INC. BE LIABLE FOR INDIRECT, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES IN
CONNECTION WITH ITS TESTING, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. IN NO EVENT SHALL PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES,
INC.’S LIABILITY, INCLUDING FOR DIRECT DAMAGES, EXCEED THE AMOUNTS PAID IN CONNECTION WITH PRINCIPLED TECHNOLOGIES, INC.’S
TESTING. CUSTOMER’S SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE REMEDIES ARE AS SET FORTH HEREIN.