Baskin UCSC Panel Feb 18 2009 Peter BordenMary Trigiani
Can renewable energy save the world? Panel discussion held by University of California, Santa Cruz February 11 2009. Peter Borden, Awais Khan, Ali Shakouri.
Baskin UCSC Panel Feb 18 2009 Peter BordenMary Trigiani
Can renewable energy save the world? Panel discussion held by University of California, Santa Cruz February 11 2009. Peter Borden, Awais Khan, Ali Shakouri.
Where will CSP plants be built? Incentives, RPS requirements, and Project Eco...Smithers Apex
- American Recovery & Reinvestment Act of 2009: now that the ARRA has expired, what will be the next big driver for the CSP sector?
- Insights into future initiatives that will help stimulate new projects
- Overview and outlook of federal and state tax incentives
Brett Prior, Senior Analyst, GREENTECH MEDIA
Business Forum: Nuclear & Renewable Energy - Brownsustg
Presentation at the US-Saudi Business Opportunities Forum (Dec 5-7, 2011, Atlanta, GA). Jim Brown, President, Global Sales First Solar, presented at the panel titled, "Nuclear and Renewable Energy: Building Resources for the Future." His presentation was called "Solar PV: A Critical Component of KSA’s Energy Sollution.
Energetic payback time of PV: In Germany and TunisiaInsulin Angel
I made this little study for the course Corporate Environmental Protection, I calculated the electricity produced and the energetic payback time for two identical installations: one in Dresden and one in Tunis.
10 minutes were too little, the subject is interesting and can be further developed.
Where will CSP plants be built? Incentives, RPS requirements, and Project Eco...Smithers Apex
- American Recovery & Reinvestment Act of 2009: now that the ARRA has expired, what will be the next big driver for the CSP sector?
- Insights into future initiatives that will help stimulate new projects
- Overview and outlook of federal and state tax incentives
Brett Prior, Senior Analyst, GREENTECH MEDIA
Business Forum: Nuclear & Renewable Energy - Brownsustg
Presentation at the US-Saudi Business Opportunities Forum (Dec 5-7, 2011, Atlanta, GA). Jim Brown, President, Global Sales First Solar, presented at the panel titled, "Nuclear and Renewable Energy: Building Resources for the Future." His presentation was called "Solar PV: A Critical Component of KSA’s Energy Sollution.
Energetic payback time of PV: In Germany and TunisiaInsulin Angel
I made this little study for the course Corporate Environmental Protection, I calculated the electricity produced and the energetic payback time for two identical installations: one in Dresden and one in Tunis.
10 minutes were too little, the subject is interesting and can be further developed.
Wind Energy in the southern Mediterranean, the case of EgyptPARIS
Report by Eng Bothaina Rached, General Manager of NREA, New and renewable energy authority, Cairo, www.nrea.gov.eg
Presented at the workshop of the Mediterranean Solar Plan in Berlin, 28&29 Oct 2008.
Storing energy allows grids to balance the supply and demand. Energy storage systems in commercial use today can be broadly categorized as mechanical, electrical, chemical, biological and thermal.
Smart Power Generation: Flexible Capability for System OptimizationSmart Power Generation
Catch a recording of the webinar here: http://www.energycentral.com/events/26390/Smart-Power-Generation
Slides by Joseph Ferrari, MSEng, MS-NR, Business Development Analyst, Wärtsilä North America Inc., and Alan Roark, Manager of Risk Assessments, DNV KEMA Energy & Sustainability.
Presented on October 17th, 2012.
Similar to Enel Green Power Investor Day Rome, April 22 2009 (20)
2. Investor Day
Rome - April 22nd, 2009
• Opening remarks F. Conti
• Enel Green Power: a leading player in renewable energies F. Starace
• Focus on technologies:
• Geothermal T. Volpe
• Hydro V. Vagliasindi
• Focus on technologies:
• Wind M. Bezzeccheri
• Solar Photovoltaic I. Wilhelm
• Business Development Model R. Deambrogio
• Financial highlights A. De Paoli
• Conclusions F. Starace
1
4. Enel Group renewable energy production
2008
By Company By Technology
Enel
19.6 TWh1
Other
0.6TWh
Enel Green Wind
Power 3.4 TWh
17.2 TWh2
Geothermal
5.2 TWh
Endesa
42.4 TWh3 Hydro4
70 TWh
Total Enel Group production
Total Enel Group production
79.2 TWh4
79.2 TWh4
(1) It includes Slovenske Elektrarne large hydro
(2) Pro-forma 2008
(3) Endesa data consolidated at 100% and net of the agreed transfers to Acciona
(4) Net of pumped storage production 3
5. Investor Day
Rome - April 22nd, 2009
• Opening remarks F. Conti
• Enel Green Power: a leading player in renewable energies F. Starace
• Focus on technologies:
• Geothermal T. Volpe
• Hydro V. Vagliasindi
• Focus on technologies:
• Wind M. Bezzeccheri
• Solar Photovoltaic I. Wilhelm
• Business Development Model R. Deambrogio
• Financial highlights A. De Paoli
• Conclusions F. Starace
4
6. Enel Green Power:
a leading player in renewable energies
Francesco Starace
Investor Day
Rome - April 22nd, 2009
5
7. Renewable energies:
strong fundamentals in all geographies
Estimates of renewables installed capacity, 2008-2020
Europe
1,030 GW max
North America
620 GW min
390 GW
TOTAL WORLD
550 GW max
3,020 GW
min max
230 GW 330 GW 2008 2020
1,820 GW
min
1,150 GW
2008 2020
2008 2020
Latin America Africa Asia
1,000 GW max
600 GW min
330 GW max
110 GW max 350 GW
150 GW 200 GW min 70 GW min
30 GW
2008 2020 2008 2020 2008 2020
Up to 1,900 GW of renewable capacity additions
Up to 1,900 GW of renewable capacity additions
Source: Enel estimates based/WEO 2008/GWEC 2008 (2008); WEO 2008 Reference Scenario (2020 min); Industry reports/McKinsey
(2020 max)
6
8. Renewable energies:
strong fundamentals in all technologies
Global installed Global installed
Technology base base Δ capacity CAGR Technological maturity
2008 2020
2% Very high (large hydro)
Hydro 960 GW 1,280 GW +320 GW
8% Very high (small hydro)
Biomass 50 GW 470 GW +420 GW 20% Very high
Geothermal 10 GW 30 GW +20 GW 10% High
High (on-shore)
Wind 120 GW 800 GW +680 GW 17% Low (off-shore)
Medium (c-SI) Solar
Low (Thin Film) PV
Solar 10 GW 440 GW +430 GW 37%
Concentrated
Low solar power
TOTAL 1,150 GW 3,020 GW +1,870 GW 8%
All technologies have potential for major capacity additions
All technologies have potential for major capacity additions
Source: Enel estimates based/WEO 2008/GWEC 2008 (2008); Industry reports/McKinsey (2020)
7
9. Enel Green Power: large renewable player well
positioned in growth geographies
2008*
EGP presence
Enel Green Power
4,464 MW
17.2 TWh
North America
748 MW
1.8 TWh
France Romania,
12 MW Bulgaria
0.01 TWh Pipeline
Iberia
Latin America
399 MW
667 MW
0.8 TWh
3.5 TWh Greece
Italy
91 MW
2,547 MW
0.2 TWh
10.9 TWh
* Proforma data
Note: Endesa capacity not included (1,026 MW: 799 MW in Iberia and 227 MW in Latin America)
8
10. Enel Green Power: active in all four key technologies
Enel Green Power
Technology Net installed capacity Net production Key areas
2008 2008
Italy – Iberia – Europe – North America –
Hydro 2,498 MW 9.6 TWh Latin America
Geothermal 678 MW 5.2 TWh Italy – North America
Wind Italy – Iberia – Europe – North America –
1,237 MW 2.1 TWh Latin America
Solar 4 MW n.m.
n.m. Italy (retail and module manufacturing)
Biomass 48 MW 0.3 TWh Iberia – North America
and other
TOTAL 4,464 MW 17.2 TWh
9
11. Company structure
Tot. 2,564
Employees
1,566
• Group holding
• Italian geo, hydro
Enel Green Power SpA
Enel Green Power SpA and wind
Italy activities
116
Italian solar PV
Enel Green Power
Enel Green Power Enel.Si srl
activities Enel.Si srl
International BV
International BV Italy
Italy
Holding of all
international
activities
68 285 479 50*
North
North
Europe
Europe America Latin America
Latin America Spain
Spain
America
* Equivalent to 50% of EUFER
10
12. Organizational model
Renewable Energies
Renewable Energies
F. Starace
Regulatory
Regulatory Corporate
Corporate Human
Human
Legal Affairs
Legal Affairs
Affairs
Affairs Affairs
Affairs Resources
Resources
F. Egidi F. R. Napolitano G. Fazio G. Stratta
Administration
Administration Business
Business
Procurement
Procurement Finance and
Finance and Internal Audit
Internal Audit Engineering
Engineering
Development
Development
Control
Control
D. Marcozzi A. De Paoli S. Fiori R. Deambrogio V. Vagliasindi (a.i.)
North
North Latin
Latin Italy
Italy Italy
Italy
Europe
Europe America
America America
America Operations
Operations Development
Development Spain
Spain
Area
Area Area
Area Area
Area Area
Area Area
Area
M. Bezzeccheri T. Volpe V. Cecchi V. Vagliasindi R. P. I. Wilhelm M. Bezzeccheri
11
13. Enel Green Power: four pillars to build upon
Balanced technology mix
Balanced technology mix
Diversified geographical presence
Diversified geographical presence
Low dependence on incentive schemes
Low dependence on incentive schemes
Growth flexibility
Growth flexibility
12
14. Balanced technology mix
2008*
Production Load factor Incentivized production** EBITDA/MW
(TWh) (%) (%) (k€)
17.2
0.3 69% 99% n.m.
n.m.
Other
Geo 5.2 88% 34% 686
Hydro 9.6 44% 7% 201
Wind 2.1 22% 95% 191
2008
Avg. 46% Avg. 27% Avg. 278
High load factor and
High load factor and
low dependence on incentive schemes
low dependence on incentive schemes
* Proforma data
** Includes production from plants entitled to PTCs (North America) 13
15. Diversified geographical presence
20081
Regulatory framework
Country Capacity Incentivized production2 Avg. remuneration3 (affecting future projects)
Italy 2,547 MW 24% 99 €/MWh Green Certificates, Feed-in
Feed-
Feed-in, Market
Feed-
Spain 399 MW 100% 104 €/MWh
+Premium
Europe
France 12 MW 100% Feed-in
Feed-
89 €/MWh
Greece 91 MW 100% Feed-in, Grants
Feed-
North America 748 MW 59% 56 €/MWh PTC, ITC
Green Certificates,
Latin America4 667 MW 0% 76 €/MWh
Fiscal Incentives
Total 4,464 MW 27% 90 €/MWh
Diversified geographies
Diversified geographies
with low dependence on incentive schemes
with low dependence on incentive schemes
(1) Proforma data
(2) Includes production from plants entitled to PTCs (North America)
(3) Does not include effects of hedging policy
(4) Includes Panama 14
16. Growth flexibility
2008*
A solid pipeline… …with projects in four technologies
(GW) (GW)
0.6 0.1 16.7
10.7 16.7 0.6 0.5
14.9
3.8
1.6
0.6
Under
Under Highly
Highly confident Likely
Likely (50%) Potential
Potential (20%) Total
Total Wind Hydro Geo Solar Other Total
construction
construction (90%)
confident (50%) (20%)
(100%)
(100%) (90%)
6 GW
6 GW of solid pipeline plus 10.7 GW of additional opportunities
6 GW of solid pipeline plus 10.7 GW of additional opportunities
* Proforma data; Endesa not included (accounting for 12.4 GW in terms of pipeline)
15
17. Development model
Staff Functions: ICT, Communication, Corporate, AFC, Regulatory, Legal, HR, Audit, Procurement
EPC
Business O&M
Development Integration M&A
Project identification Realization of approved Plant operation
Screening projects
Production optimization
Valuation Integration of acquisitions
Continuous improvement
Permitting CapEx expenditure
EBITDA generation
Approval process
CapEx allocation
Industrial approach to value creation
Industrial approach to value creation
16
18. Leveraging on competencies
Hydro Geothermal Wind Solar PV
2.5 GW installed globally 0.7 GW installed globally 1.2 GW installed globally Strong position in the
fast growing Italian
market
• Long lasting • Skills in development, • Large pipeline, split • Leading retail network in
competencies exploration, engineering among geographies to Italy (Enel.si)
• Skills ranging from and construction, O&M maximize optionality and
return on investment • Competence Centre
development to operation • Development of new (within R&D Division) in
and maintenance projects in Latin America • Flexibility in turbines Italy
• Project pipeline in Italy and North America procurement, taking
advantage of industry • Upstream integration into
and Latin America cell/module
shake-up (overcapacity,
cost reduction) manufacturing (in
progress)
Established Well positioned to take
Fully integrated Unique position in the
competencies in advantage of sector
geothermal operator solar PV value chain
development and O&M shake-up
Leveraging competencies across all geographies
Leveraging competencies across all geographies
17
19. Balanced growth on multiple technologies
Enel Green Power
technologies
Financial attractiveness… …and long-term sustainability
Wind
Geo Hydro Geo
EGP competitive
>12%
on-shore
High Solar
EGP return*
Biomass
Hydro PV
advantage
Solar Wind
10-12% PV Medium on-shore
CSP
CSP
Wind Biomass Wind
5-10% off-shore
off-shore Low
Low Medium High Low Medium High
Potential capacity additions Potential energy cost
(2008-2020, GW) abatement (2008-2020, %)
Maximizing returns and enhancing long-term sustainability
Maximizing returns and enhancing long-term sustainability
* Unlevered project IRR after taxes
18
20. Investor Day
Rome - April 22nd, 2009
• Opening remarks F. Conti
• Enel Green Power: a leading player in renewable energies F. Starace
• Focus on technologies:
• Geothermal T. Volpe
• Hydro V. Vagliasindi
• Focus on technologies:
• Wind M. Bezzeccheri
• Solar Photovoltaic I. Wilhelm
• Business Development Model R. Deambrogio
• Financial highlights A. De Paoli
• Conclusions F. Starace
19
22. Worldwide installed capacity
GW
4%
CAGR
19
13
10
8
2000 2008 2015 2020
Slow but constant growth due to
Slow but constant growth due to
scattered resources and long development time
scattered resources and long development time
Source: IEA; IGA; Worldwatch Institute; United Nations; Enel analysis on WEO 2008, industry reports.
21
24. Geothermal systems
Type of reservoir Application/technology
Heat pumps
Heat pumps
0 - 500 m Dry Shallow reservoir Heat exchange
Heat exchange
Hydrothermal
Depth
500 – 5,000 m Electricity generation -
Electricity generation -
Systems: shallow and Conventional technologies
Conventional technologies
deep reservoir
> 5,000 m Hot deep dry rock Engineered geothermal
Engineered geothermal
reservoir systems - Future perspectives
systems - Future perspectives
Application and technology driven by reservoir characteristics
Application and technology driven by reservoir characteristics
23
25. Conventional technologies
Dry steam Flash steam Binary cycle
power plants power plants power plants
Water with temperatures higher Water at lower temperatures
Dry Steam.
than ~180ºC. between ~ 110-180ºC.
195 237
Units
Units 58
Global Installed
capacity 2008
2.6 5.6
0.8
Capacity
Capacity
(GW)
(GW) Highly cost competitive Most dominant in terms of Useful alongside geothermal
but geographically limited global capacity heating, hot springs, etc
Aver. size
Aver. size
~45 ~29 ~3
(MW)
(MW)
24
26. Technological evolution
Medium term Long-term
Past 5-10 outlook 5-10 outlook 10+
years years years
Today
• Dry steam
• Flash steam
Conventional
Conventional Binary cycle
technologies
technologies
Binary cycle
Break-through
Break-through
technologies EGS
technologies
Long term break-trough is expected
Long term break-trough is expected
with Engineered Geothermal Systems
with Engineered Geothermal Systems
25
27. Typical development process
Surface Deep exploration Feasibility Field
Surface Deep exploration Feasibility Field
exploration (Drilling) study Development
exploration (Drilling) study Development
Duration
Duration 4-8 10-14 10-14 24-36
(months)
(months)
• Geological, • Permitting and • Permitting and • Permitting and
geochemical and procurement procurement procurement
geophysical • Production and
• Well pads and roads • Well pads and roads
prospecting design/construction design/construction reinjection wells
• Integration of geo- (10-15 new wells)
• Well design/planning • Drilling
scientific data and (2-3 additional wells) • Steam separation
Description
Description resource modelling • Drilling
and gathering
(min. 2 wells) • Well testing
system installation
• Power plant and
transmission line
construction
Key
Key • Resource • Drilling • Project design • Project
competencies
competencies characterization • Resource • Project management
characterization integration and
integration
26
28. The industry is mostly local, with only a few players
operating supra-regionally
Installed capacity* - 2008, GW
Sites: 4
Capacity:
1,341 MW
Sites: 5 Sites: 6
Capacity: Capacity: 362 MW
Sites: 6
1,930 MW
Capacity: 353 MW
Sites: 3
Capacity:
390 MW
Sites: 13
Capacity: 1,200 MW
Sites: 3 Sites: 2
Capacity: Capacity:
678 MW 953 MW
Sites: 12
Capacity: 430 MW
* Installed capacity indicated represents highest figure
between field and plant capacity
Source: Company Web sites, press releases, team analysis
27
29. Value chain Corporate activity
Leading operators in terms of installed capacity Within top players
Project
Project Plant
Plant Plant
Plant
R&D
R&D Development/
Development/ Exploration
Exploration Drilling
Drilling design/
design/ operation
operation
Finance
Finance construction
construction
Enel Green Power
Geysir (Iceland)
Ormat (Israel/U.S.)
PNOC EDC (Philippines)
CFE (Mexico)
Pertamina (Indonesia)
Caithness Energy (U.S.)
Calpine (U.S.)
CalEnergy (U.S.)
The industry is highly fragmented along the value chain
The industry is highly fragmented along the value chain
28
30. Typical project economics for a new entrant Key drivers
Example Italy
Drivers Values
2008 2020
• CapEx1 • EUR 4.00 million/MW • EUR 3.50 million/MW
Investment
Investment
• OpEx • EUR 50,000/ MW • EUR 45,000/ MW
• Load factor • 8,000 hours • 8,200 hours2
Operating
Operating
• Useful life • 30 years • 30 years
(1) Highly variable and subject to site characteristics
(2) At same natural conditions, higher load factor achieved thanks to improved plant operations from better plant components
(e.g., separator)
29
31. Remuneration scheme by country
Average
remuneration
Country Type of remuneration scheme EUR/MWh
Italy • Green certificates1 171
France • Feed-in tariff2 128
Greece • Feed-in tariff3 85
• None; under discussion
Chile 704
introduction of certificates
USA • Choice between 30% capex subsidy
(ITC) or tax deductible credit (PTC) 675
Turkey • None 604
(1) Assuming 0.9 green certificates (in addition to wholesale price)
(2) In addition, accelerated depreciation allowed
(3) In addition, 30% CapEx subsidy awarded
(4) Wholesale price
(5) Assuming wholesale price of 50 EUR/MWh + tax deductible credit equivalent to 17 EUR/MWh
30
32. Enel Green Power installed base and pipeline
2008
EGP presence
Total
N. plants 33
678 MW
North America* 5,218 GWh
N. plants 1 Pipeline 535 MW
7 MW
37 GWh
Pipeline 127 MW
Latin America
Pipeline 299 MW
Italy
N. plants 32
810 MW
(671 MW net)
5,181 GWh
Pipeline 110 MW
* As of 15/04/2009, an additional 65 MW of gross geothermal capacity have become operational
31
33. Focus on Italy geo plants
Enel Green Power Key competencies
GWh
6000
Geothermal generation
5000 from 1900 to today
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
19 4
19 9
19 4
19 9
19 4
19 9
19 4
19 9
19 4
19 9
19 4
19 9
19 4
19 9
19 4
19 9
19 4
20 9
04
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5
6
6
7
7
8
8
9
9
19
Continuous growth of production for over 100 years
Continuous growth of production for over 100 years
thanks to our field cultivation expertise
thanks to our field cultivation expertise
32
34. Enel Green Power’s strategy on geothermal
• Leverage our unique
• Leverage our unique
competencies
competencies
• Selectively develop capacity in
• Selectively develop capacity in
North America and Latin America
North America and Latin America
CapEx (m€) Installed capacity (MW) Energy production (TWh)
Total 09-13 = 652 m€
+16% +12%
807
35% 678 5.8
5.2
65%
Growth
Maintenance 2008 2013
2008 2013
33
35. Investor Day
Rome - April 22nd, 2009
• Opening remarks F. Conti
• Enel Green Power: a leading player in renewable energies F. Starace
• Focus on technologies:
• Geothermal T. Volpe
• Hydro V. Vagliasindi
• Focus on technologies:
• Wind M. Bezzeccheri
• Solar Photovoltaic I. Wilhelm
• Business Development Model R. Deambrogio
• Financial highlights A. De Paoli
• Conclusions F. Starace
34
37. Worldwide installed capacity
GW
2%
CAGR 1,240
1,069
962
783
2000 2008 2015 2020
The most important “traditional” renewable energy
The most important “traditional” renewable energy
Source: REN21, UDI database; McKinsey; Enel analysis on WEO 2008, industry reports.
36
38. Resources availability
Average Annual Precipitation (Millimeters)
0-100
100-200
200-400
400-600
600-1,000
1,000-1,500
1,500-2,000
2,000-3,000
More than 3,000 Source: IIASA
37
39. Hydropower technology can be classified according to
usage and water head Enel Green Power
technologies
Water
usage
Reservoir Run of river
• Power plants • Medium/small
with high plants, with
High head capacity production
15-1,000 m
and flexible linked to water
Head of water
production flow availability
• Medium/small • Medium/small
Low head hydropower plants with
<15 m
plants with big production
usage of water limited to water
flow flow availability
38
40. Typical development process
Preliminary
Preliminary Engineering Permitting Construction
assessment Engineering Permitting Construction
assessment
Duration
Duration 1-2 1 1-2 1-7
(years)
(years)
• Site investigation • Planning of civil, • Water diversion • Civil works (dams,
electromechanical license penstock, building)
• Hydrological
and electrical and hydrological
studies • Environmental
works works
impact evaluation;
Description
Description • Head
• Grid connection • Machinery and
measurements • Construction
turbines assembly
authorization
• Electrical works and
connections
• Resource • Design • Relationship • Project
evaluation optimization management management
Key
Key with Local
competencies • Project
competencies integration
Authorities
39
41. Typical project economics for a new entrant Key drivers
Example Italy
Drivers Values
2008 2020
• CapEx • EUR 2.20 million/MW • EUR 2.20 million/MW
Investment
Investment
• OpEx • EUR 28,000/MW • EUR 25,000/MW
• Load factor • 3,500 hours • 3,500 hours
Operating
Operating
• Useful life • 30 years • 30 years
40
42. Remuneration scheme by country
Average remuneration
Country Type of remuneration scheme EUR/MWh
Italy • Green certificates 180
Spain • Feed-in tariff or wholesale + 89
premium1
Greece • Feed-in tariff2 80
France • Feed-in tariff3 78
Portugal • Feed-in tariff 76
(1) Operator can choose preferred remuneration scheme. A cap is defined by the regulation
(2) In addition, 30% CapEx subsidy awarded
(3) In addition, accelerated depreciation allowed
41
43. Enel Green Power installed base and pipeline
2008
EGP presence
Total
N. plants 376
2,498 MW
North America 9,653 GWh
N. plants 62 Pipeline 600 MW
314 MW
964 GWh
Latin America
Spain
N. plants 31
N. plants 5
643 MW
26 MW Greece
3,425 GWh Italy
27 GWh N. plants 1
Pipeline 541 MW N. plants 277 5 MW
1,510 MW 2 GWh
5,235 GWh Pipeline 10 MW
Pipeline 50 MW
* Endesa hydro assets (221 MW) and hydro pipeline (0.6 GW) not included 42
44. Focus on Italy hydroelectric power plants
Domodossola Bergamo Business Unit
Business Unit
70 Plants 124 Plants
493 MW 587 MW
1,971 GWh 2,943 GWh
Rusià Castelnuovo
Napoli Business Unit Garfagnana
83 Plants
430 MW
1,631 GWh
Pettorano
43
45. Italy: re-powering of hydroelectric plants
94
New turbines
92
90
88 +5 %
86
Old turbines
84
82
Efficiency 80
+12 %
(%) 78
76
74
72
70
68
66
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Power (MW)
More energy with same water
More energy with same water
44
46. Enel Green Power’s strategy on hydroelectric
• Leverage EGP’s unique
• Leverage EGP’s unique
long-standing competencies
long-standing competencies
• Selectively develop capacity in
• Selectively develop capacity in
North America and Latin America
North America and Latin America
CapEx (m€) Installed capacity (MW) Energy production (TWh)
Total 09-13 = 520 m€
+5% +3%
2,497 2,627 9.7 9.9
38%
62%
Growth
Maintenance 2008 2013
2008 2013
45
47. Investor Day
Rome - April 22nd, 2009
• Opening remarks F. Conti
• Enel Green Power: a leading player in renewable energies F. Starace
• Focus on technologies:
• Geothermal T. Volpe
• Hydro V. Vagliasindi
• Coffee break
• Focus on technologies:
• Wind M. Bezzeccheri
• Solar Photovoltaic I. Wilhelm
• Business Development Model R. Deambrogio
• Financial highlights A. De Paoli
• Conclusions F. Starace
• Lunch (Q&A)
46
51. Technology overview
Average turbine price*, m€/MW
•• CapEx reduction has been
CapEx reduction has been
starting in early 80s
starting in early 80s •• Debottlenecking of
Debottlenecking of
•• Technology evolution led to
Technology evolution led to supply chain
supply chain
decrease in CapEx
decrease in CapEx
3.2 •• Supply bottleneck
Supply bottleneck
•• Rise in commodities prices
Rise in commodities prices
-6% p.a.
1.8 +20% p.a.
-7%
-13%
1.4
1.2 1.3 1.3
1.2
1.0 0.9
0.8
1981 1990 1997 1999 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Long-term technology evolution resulting
Long-term technology evolution resulting
in improved wind economics
in improved wind economics
* BoP (Balance of Plant) not included 50
52. Value chain dynamics
Driving factors Description Stakeholder affected
• New manufacturing capacity (key
Easing out
Easing out • OEMs: reduced margins
components)
of supply
of supply
• Internalization of components • Operators: increased negotiation
constraints
constraints
manufacturing by OEMs power, improved project
• Better planning/ management along the economics
value chain
• Decreased availability of attractive • Small developers: most projects
More
More financing are being postponed or
difficult
difficult
• Difficulties in finding financial partners monetized
financing
financing
in countries with tax-based incentives • Large operators: interesting
(e.g. USA) opportunities for pipeline
acquisition
Learning • Wind-farm operators are moving • Industrial operators: value
Learning
effects in from contracted O&M to in-house creation thorough excellence in
effects in
O&M O&M O&M
O&M
“Power shift” along the value chain
“Power shift” along the value chain
will benefit large, integrated operators
will benefit large, integrated operators
51
53. Typical development process
Development
Development Permitting
Permitting Construction
Construction
Duration
Duration 1-2 2-3 0.5 - 1
(years)
(years)
• Resource • Authorization • Integration,
evaluation, by all relevant program
Description
Description land rights authorities management
• Local presence • Robust technical • Well tuned
Key
Key & partnership support, project
competencies
competencies with local socioeconomic & management &
players political supervision
knowledge
Full lifecycle management of project
Full lifecycle management of project
is key for success
is key for success
52
54. Future landscape
Key elements Key evidence
• Wholesale grid parity already reached in some countries
Wholesale grid
Wholesale grid (e.g. Portugal, UK, Ireland)
parity widely
parity widely • Wholesale grid parity reached in the very short-term (by 2012) in
reached
reached several other countries (e.g. Morocco, Spain)
• Europe expected to retain largest share of total installed
capacity by 2020 (~40%), together with USA
New geographies
New geographies
emerging
emerging • New geographies emerging thanks to significant growth rate
(e.g. China, India and Brazil)
• Growth in mature markets (e.g. Germany) driven by
Repowering of repowering of existing infrastructure
Repowering of
old assets
old assets
53
55. Typical project economics for a new entrant Key drivers
Example Italy
Drivers Values
2008 2020
• CapEx • EUR 1.60 million/MW • EUR 0.80 million/MW
Investment
Investment
• OpEx • EUR 30,600/MW • EUR 19,800/MW
• Load factor • 2,000 hours • 2,480 hours1
Operating
Operating
• Useful life • 20 years • 20 years
(1) At same natural conditions, higher load factor achieved due to more efficient turbines
54
56. Remuneration scheme by country
Average remuneration
Country Type of remuneration scheme EUR/MWh
Italy • Green certificates 180
Romania • Green certificates (1.5x for wind) 125
• Feed-in tariff or wholesale +
Spain 88
premium1
France • Feed-in tariff2 85
Greece • Feed-in tariff3 80
Portugal • Feed-in tariff 78
USA • Choice between 30% CapEx subsidy 4
67
(ITC) or tax deductible credit (PTC)
(1) Operator can choose preferred remuneration scheme. A cap is defined by the regulation
(2) In addition, accelerated depreciation allowed
(3) In addition, 30% CapEx subsidy awarded
(4) Assuming wholesale price of 50 EUR/MWh + tax deductible credit equivalent to 17 EUR/MWh
55
57. Enel Green Power installed base and pipeline
2008
EGP presence
Total*
N. plants 78
1,237 MW
North America 2,061 GWh
N. plants 7 Pipeline 14,897 MW
406 MW
696 GWh
Pipeline 5,142 MW
France
N. plants 3
Romania and
12 MW Bulgaria
7 GWh
Pipeline 521 MW
Pipeline 508 MW
Latin America
N. plants 1 Spain
24 MW
N. plants 30 Greece
47 GWh 346 MW Italy N. plants 8
Pipeline 1,930 MW 624 GWh N. plants 29 87 MW
Pipeline 2,260 MW 362 MW 219 GWh
467 GWh Pipeline 1,165 MW
Pipeline 3,371 MW
* Endesa wind assets (731 MW) and wind pipeline (11.3 GW) not included 56
58. Enel Green Power positioning along the value chain
Development
Development Permitting
Permitting Construction
Construction O&M
O&M
• Large, high • Focused on • Leverage on Enel • Maximization of
quality and building public skills and plant availability
diversified acceptance experience
• Sustainable cost
pipeline
• Proactive • Lean and reduction
• Local presence cooperation effective
• Implementation of
to catch best with local organization
data management
opportunity authorities
• Standardized systems improve
• International • Capability to processes and effectiveness
network manage a wide reports to meet
• High-quality O&M
pipeline budget and
standards
schedules
Strongly positioned in O&M,
Strongly positioned in O&M,
key to maximizing value of wind investments
key to maximizing value of wind investments
57
59. Centre of expertise to leverage on technological competencies
SCADA (Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition)
•
• Real time and historical data collection
Real time and historical data collection
•
• Supervision and telecontrol
Supervision and telecontrol
•
• KPI tracking
KPI tracking
• Fast response to grid events
• Fast response to grid events
TCP/IP METERING (GPRS modem)
• Hourly updated
• Hourly updated
• Reliability and fast communication.
• Reliability and fast communication.
• Improvement of short time forecasting models
• Improvement of short time forecasting models
TCP/IP METERING (GPRS modem)
•
• Data exchanged with different Market/Transport Operators
Data exchanged with different Market/Transport Operators
•
• Systems upgraded to new standards
Systems upgraded to new standards
•
• Centralized database
Centralized database
TCP/IP METERING (GPRS modem)
• Meteorological models
• Meteorological models
• Short time real-data-based models
• Short time real-data-based models
58
60. Enel Green Power’s strategy on wind
• Develop growth options in core markets
• Develop growth options in core markets
• Maintain a diversified geographical presence
• Maintain a diversified geographical presence
• Mixed development model
• Mixed development model
• Capture opportunities in equipment procurement
• Capture opportunities in equipment procurement
CapEx (m€) Installed capacity (MW) Energy production (TWh)
Total 09-13 = 2,194 m€
+124% +213%
1% 2,773
6.4
1,237
99% 2.1
Growth
Maintenance 2008 2013 2008 2013
59
61. Investor Day
Rome - April 22nd, 2009
• Opening remarks F. Conti
• Enel Green Power: a leading player in renewable energies F. Starace
• Focus on technologies:
• Geothermal T. Volpe
• Hydro V. Vagliasindi
• Focus on technologies:
• Wind M. Bezzeccheri
• Solar Photovoltaic I. Wilhelm
• Business Development Model R. Deambrogio
• Financial highlights A. De Paoli
• Conclusions F. Starace
60
63. The Market: solar energy world-wide
Irradiation
W/m2 • All major renewable energy sources
such as hydro, wind, and obviously
350
photovoltaic power ultimately come
300 from the sun
250
• Total solar energy absorbed by the Earth
200 is 3,850,000 EJ (exajoules) per year
150
• Total Wind energy on Earth is 2,250 EJ
100 and total Biomass energy is 3,000 EJ
per year
50
0 • Total Human Primary Energy use is
some 500 EJ per year
Source: NASA 2008
(of which electricity some 12%)
The map shows average irradiation on Earth.
The black spots represent the space
necessary to replace the world’s primary
energy supply with solar electricity.
18 TWe equals 568 EJ.
62
64. Worldwide installed Photovoltaic Capacity
Cumulative Power in GW
210
x15
85
x15
15
1
2000 2008 2015 2020
• Capacity growth rates of photovoltaic power above 15% per year
• Capacity growth rates of photovoltaic power above 15% per year
• In 2008 worldwide capacity increased by over 5,000 MW
• In 2008 worldwide capacity increased by over 5,000 MW
Source: Enel analysis on WEO 2008, industry reports
63
65. The Market: Europe
75
Irradiation
x8
1,600-1,750 kWh/m2* year
1,400-1,600 45
1,200-1,400
1,050-1,200
<1,050
x45
9
0.2
2000 2008 2015 2020
• Europe’s installed photovoltaic capacity today is over 9,000 MW
• Europe’s installed photovoltaic capacity today is over 9,000 MW
• Very high irradiation levels around the Mediterranean basin
• Very high irradiation levels around the Mediterranean basin
Source: EPIA Policy driven Scenario, Enel analysis 64
66. The Market: Italy
Irradiation
1,000
18
x 45
1,200
1,400
8
x 200
1,600
0.4
1,800 0.002
2000 2008 2015 2020
Global horizontal irradiation kWh/m2 * year
• In 2008 over 340 MW of new capacity: Italy is among global TOP 5
• In 2008 over 340 MW of new capacity: Italy is among global TOP 5
• High irradiation levels in the Southern parts of Italy
• High irradiation levels in the Southern parts of Italy
65
67. Medium/long term technology evolution
Short term Medium term Long term
1-5 years 5-10 years 10+ years
Wave 1 – Crystal Silicon (c-Si)
Solar PV
Solar PV
Wave 2b – Thin film:
Wave 2a – Thin film:
Copper, Indium, Gallium,
amorphous Silicon (a-Si)
Selenide (CIGS)
Cadmium Telluride (CdTe)
nano-technologies
Solar
Solar Wave 3 – Solar thermal
thermal
thermal
• a-Si thin film evolves as a new competitive large-scale technology
• a-Si thin film evolves as a new competitive large-scale technology
• Still large potential for technological evolution
• Still large potential for technological evolution
66
68. Key driver for market growth: grid parity
Average power price for households c-Si cumulative installed
EUR/KWh capacity in 2020 in GW
0.70
0.65
0.60
0.55 Cost to generate power
Cost to generate power
0.50
with solar system @ ca.
with solar system @ ca.
EUR4.70/Wp
EUR4.70/Wp
0.45
0.40
0.35
California Tier 5
2008
0.30
Germany
0.25 Japan Italy
0.20 France Portugal
US
Spain Australia
0.15 North East 2015
California other
0.10 South Korea 2020
Greece
0.05 China Southwest US India
0
Annual solar
800 900 1,000 1,100 1,200 1,300 1,400 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 energy hours
• Grid parity to be reached in several countries within the next 5 years
• Grid parity to be reached in several countries within the next 5 years
• Italy will be the first “grid parity” market in Europe
• Italy will be the first “grid parity” market in Europe
67
69. Enel Green Power positioning along the value chain
Manufacturing Distribution Development Construction O&M
Manufacturing Distribution Development Construction O&M
•Building & •Supplying of •Land Scouting •Final design •Plant visual
Production photovoltaic inspection
Major •Due diligence •Modules, inverters,
Major Equipment* components
BOS integration •PV testing
content
content •Conceptual design
•Plant certification •PV field
measurement
Long Term
EGP
EGP Partnership Enel.si EGP IPP Projects EGP / Enel.si
•Flexible •Procurement •Dedicated •Specialized •Combined
contracts development and engineering team: O&M with
•Franchising
engineering team Construction Project existing
•Set of asset- network with over
management renewables
based and 450 entrepreneurs
Activity commercial •Network of
Activity •Over 50 MW of PV
long-term PV installers
installed in past
supply options throughout
three years
under study Italy
(*) Silicon Crystalline Production Plant 68
70. Typical development process: 9-12 months
Due Project Project Permitting
Land Scouting Due Project Project Permitting
Land Scouting diligence Finance Engineering Authorization
diligence Finance Engineering Authorization
Duration 1 1 1-2 1 6-9
Duration
(months)
(months)
• Solar energy • Feasibility study on • Project • Approval • Administrative
potential production potential presentation design procedures
and costs (material, (building
• Cost • Discussion with
BOS, grid, etc.) statement, grid
Description (purchase/ banks
Description connection,
rental) • Conceptual design
leases, etc.)
• Data base local • Valuation • Network with • Project • Regulatory
regulations • Due diligence credit institutes Management expertise
• Relationship capabilities and design
Key • Permitting &
Key capabilities
• Screening • Business authorization
competencies
competencies capabilities • Design tools
modeling
(CAD)
69
71. Typical project economics for a new entrant Key drivers
Example Italy
Drivers Values
2008 2020
• CapEx1 • EUR 4.30 million/MW • EUR 1.60 million/MW
Investment
Investment
• OpEx2 • EUR 40,000/MW • EUR 35,000/MW
• Load factor • 1,250 hours • 1,250 hours
Operating
Operating • Useful life • 20 years • 20 years
• Productivity • 0.5%/year • 0.5%/year
decay
(1) Average of thin film technologies. Efficiency around 9%.
(2) 10 MW power plant (insurance not included)
70