The Center for Undergraduate Research (CURS) at Georgia Regents University (soon to be Augusta University) offers strong support for faculty-led undergraduate research. In collaboration with a student organization, the program director of CURS contacted the GRU Libraries to investigate how to start an undergraduate research journal for the university and identify a venue for publishing undergraduate research.
Since the University Libraries recently helped develop an open-access journal for the College of Education, which is hosted in the institutional repository, two librarians were able to utilize this experience and provide guidance to CURS and the student organization. They worked together on the creation of Arsenal: The Undergraduate Research Journal of Georgia Regents University (Augusta University),a new open access journal specifically aimed at publishing undergraduate research of current students. This session will discuss the process of establishing the journal’s identity, developing policies and processes, hosting and publishing the journal, as well as some of the challenges faced.
Speakers:
Melissa Johnson, Reese Library, Augusta University
Kim Mears, Robert Greenblatt, MD Library, Augusta University
Abigail Drescher, Center for Undergraduate Research & Scholarship, Augusta University
Serach, Serendipity & the Researcher ExperienceNASIG
Presenter: Lettie Conrad, Executive Program Manager, Discovery & Product Analysis, SAGE Publishing
When considering academic researchers’ information-seeking and retrieval needs, we often focus on search – optimizing for search, Google-like search for libraries, user preferences for one-box quick-search tools, and so on. But what about unplanned instances of discovery? Are new technologies, such as text mining and natural language processing, enabling new pathways that lead researchers to relevant material, perhaps even leading to surprising new connections across disciplines? Conversely, with the prevalence of satisficing, does serendipity even play a role when searching for information about a scholarly topic?_x000D_
Through a study of undergraduate students and their faculty members, as well as a survey of publisher and website offerings, this talk will summarize common user pathways and how today’s students and faculty use content recommendation tools with recommendations for how libraries and the scholarly communications community might respond.
The Future of Information Literacy in the Library: An Example of Librarian/Pu...NASIG
The last decade has seen immense growth in information sources and information output, which in turn has changed the way students and researchers find and use information. Following this, we’ve also seen a shift from the traditional “librarian as expert” role to the “librarian as teacher” role, where the imparting of information literacy skills and their embedding into the curriculum is recognized as a primary responsibility of today’s academic librarian.
This session will explore how librarians are becoming more involved with information literacy curriculum and how publishers can assist them, particularly regarding access to information and the scholarly publishing process.
In 2015 and early 2016, Rebecca Donlan, Assistant Director for Collection Management at Florida Gulf Coast University (FGCU), and Stacy Sieck, Library Communications Manager at Taylor & Francis Group, created and implemented an information literacy program for FCGU students and faculty that focuses specifically on navigating the scholarly publishing landscape.This collaborative project includes the creation and launch of webinars and online toolkits that provide tips and information on how to get published in academic journals, understanding the peer review process, navigating Open Access publishing, promoting and resuing your work, and more.
During this session, Rebecca and Stacy will provide an update on the status of their information literacy project, including user feedback, webinar usage statistics, and tips and best practices for recreating a similar program at different universities.
Speakers:
Rebecca Donlan, Assistant Director for Collection Management, Florida Gulf Coast University
Stacy V. Sieck, Library Communications Manager, The Americas, Taylor & Francis Group
Shaping Expectations: Defining and Refining the Role of Technical Services in...NASIG
From trial to implementation, technical services staff play an important role in shaping awareness of, and expectations for, new resources. Internally, technical services staff provide information and instruction to public services staff. Externally, they influence how new resources are integrated into the library website and other platforms. With appropriate “message control,” technical services staff can positively influence awareness of new resources while keeping everyone’s expectations in check.
During fall 2015, technical services staff at Georgia Southern University adopted a protocol for new resource rollouts that explicitly times and structures internal and external communications to ensure that all library staff are ready to support new resources as they go live. This protocol focuses on providing appropriate lead-time notifications to public services staff and “training the trainers” first, prior to releasing any external communications. Furthermore, this protocol integrates with activities of the library’s promotion committee, supporting smooth transition to public services promotion of new resources.
During this session, presenters will discuss this protocol in detail, with special emphasis on timing of internal and external communications, the importance of providing sufficient staff training and support materials early on, and the importance of maintaining objectivity and accuracy in all rollout communications and assets. Presenters will share protocol planning tools and worksheets, describe how these are integrated into implementation workflows, and engage participants in discussion about the role of technical services in new resource rollouts.
Presenters:
Jeff Mortimore & Debra Skinner
Zach S. Henderson Library
Georgia Southern University
Is what's 'trending' what¹s worth purchasing?NASIG
Presenters:
Stacy Konkiel, Outreach & Engagement Manager, Altmetric
Rachel Miles, Kansas State University Libraries
Sarah Sutton, Assistant Professor in the School of Library and Information Management at Emporia State University
New forms of usage data like altmetrics are helping librarians to make smarter decisions about their collections. A recent nationwide study administered to 13,000+ librarians at R1 universities shines light on exactly how these metrics are being applied in academia. This presentation will share survey results, including as-yet-unknown rates of technology and metrics uptake among collection development librarians, the most popular citation databases and altmetrics services being used to make decisions, and surprising factors that affect attitudes toward the use of metrics. This presentation will also offer actionable insights on how altmetrics are being paired with bibliometrics and usage statistics to form a more complete picture of “trending” scholarship that’s worth purchasing. Through sharing the survey results and opening up a discussion about the potential altmetrics hold for informing collection development, the presenters aim to provide a learning opportunity for attendees which will enhance their competencies for e-resource management, specifically, core competence for e-resource librarians 3.5, use of bibliometrics for collection assessment, and 3.7, identity and analyze emerging technologies.
The Canadian Linked Data Initiative: Charting a Path to a Linked Data FutureNASIG
As libraries prepare to shift away from MARC to a linked data framework, new convergences in the metadata production activities of our libraries' technical services units, special collections, and digital libraries are becoming possible. In September 2015, the Canadian Linked Data Initiative (CLDI) was formed to leverage the existing collaboration between the Technical Services departments of Canada’s top 5 research libraries and the Library and Archives of Canada. Working cooperatively, our objective is to provide a path to linked data readiness for our institutions and leadership for the adoption of linked data by libraries across Canada. To achieve this goal, partner libraries are working across departments and institutions to create new workflows and tools and adapt to a new conceptual understanding of descriptive metadata. This presentation is a preliminary report on the progress made in five key areas of interest: digital collections, education and training, MARC record enhancement, evaluation of linked data tools and vendor supplied metadata. Building on existing initiatives, the CLDI is investigating the potential of integrating linked data elements into digitized collections, as well as MARC-based bibliographic and authority records, with the aim of fostering new and interesting pathways for resource discovery. To strengthen and expand the professional knowledge of staff, partner institutions are collaborating in the production of educational and training materials related to linked data principles and practices. The evaluation and potential development of linked data tools is another area of concentration. Finally, with the goal of changing workflows upstream, the CLDI is working to engage publishers and vendors in the linked data conversation. In addition to reporting on the work undertaken in the first year of the project, this presentation will also cover lessons learned and outline some of the new opportunities gained from working on a collaborative project that spans across multiple boundaries.
Marlene van Ballegooie, Metadata Librarian,
University of Toronto
Juliya Borie, University of Toronto Libraries
Andrew Senior, Coordinator,
E-Resources and Serials, McGill University
Open Access in the World of Scholarly Journals: creation and discoveryNASIG
Access to scholarly journals produced by commercial publishers is becoming more and more expensive, and open access to publicly-funded research results is increasingly mandated by funding bodies. In response to these and other motivators, the open access scholarly journal movement is growing. In the Canadian context, open access publishing has begun to get more traction in response to these factors, and in spite of some resistance by researchers. University and college libraries are getting involved in both the promotion and the creation of open access content. An example of this is the University of Lethbridge Journal Incubator, which publishes three open access journals from the University Library. We will explore some of the benefits and drawbacks of open access in scholarly communications.
One model of open access is the hybrid journal, which causes particular challenges for discovery and access. With access restricted at the article, rather than the journal level, it's surprisingly hard to get library users to OA content through catalogs, link resolvers, or even discovery tools. Chris will investigate some of the roadblocks and consult with publishers, librarians, and service providers to see what is currently being done to overcome this challenge. Are readers currently getting to OA content in hybrid journals through library systems and sites? Is the NISO License and Access Indicators Recommended Practice likely to change current practices? How are discovery tool vendors responding to this challenge? Can service providers outside of the traditional library content and software sector have an impact? After investigating all of these angles Chris will try to determine if there is a likely way forward and share what attendees can do to improve access to Hybrid OA journals in the short and long term.
Sandra Cowan is the liaison librarian for English, Modern Languages, Religious Studies and the Faculty of Fine Arts at the University of Lethbridge in Alberta, Canada. She has research interests in digital humanities, scholarly communications, and research methods of creative workers.
Chris Bulock is the Electronic Resources Librarian at California State University Northridge. His research has focused on perpetual access, e-resource evaluation, and the effect of Open Access on collection development and e-resource management. He writes a column on OA issues in the Serials Review, and he is an incoming NASIG Member at Large.
We participated in an Information master's program assigned to a project in Trivandrum, India. We were tasked with providing assistance on the management of a library in a college specifializing in teaching Deaf students as well as research in Audiology and Speech Language Pathology. They have a very small collection of about 2000 books and 24 journals, and no website prior to our arrival.
Our understanding was that it would be difficult to make correct assumptions about the academic and technological environment given lack of experience in the region and the culture, as well as working with students with disabilities in general. We were not prepared for the rudimentary or non-existent policies and infrastructure that we met once we actually arrived. This presentation would detail the strategies of assessment and decision-making we employed to work with their available resources as well as deal with the lack of buy-in from various stakeholders. Among these include user interviews in translation, collecting and incorporating examples from other library sites in building a new website, and above all trying to figure out ways to communicate the importance of working with library online resources upon a population that is relatively new to them.
Presenters:
Jharina Pascual, Electronic Resources Acquisitions Librarian, University of California Irvine
Sybil Boone, University of Michigan School of Information
This webinar is based on experiences of working over the past two years with a number of further education (FE) colleges to help them increase engagement with digital resources and library services. It draws on the recommendations of a number of librarians/learning resources managers on how they have increased engagement with, and use of, their resources. The emphasis will be on non-technical approaches to enhance student experience, learning and teaching.
Lis Parcell will share recommendations which will be particularly useful for librarians and learning resources staff in FE colleges, but may also be of interest to staff working in smaller university library services. Participants will be encouraged to contribute their own views on the challenges they face in increasing engagement with their digital resources and library services. We will also highlight further support available from Jisc in this area. Lis will co-present with Elizabeth Newbold, Library Manager at Activate Learning.
Serach, Serendipity & the Researcher ExperienceNASIG
Presenter: Lettie Conrad, Executive Program Manager, Discovery & Product Analysis, SAGE Publishing
When considering academic researchers’ information-seeking and retrieval needs, we often focus on search – optimizing for search, Google-like search for libraries, user preferences for one-box quick-search tools, and so on. But what about unplanned instances of discovery? Are new technologies, such as text mining and natural language processing, enabling new pathways that lead researchers to relevant material, perhaps even leading to surprising new connections across disciplines? Conversely, with the prevalence of satisficing, does serendipity even play a role when searching for information about a scholarly topic?_x000D_
Through a study of undergraduate students and their faculty members, as well as a survey of publisher and website offerings, this talk will summarize common user pathways and how today’s students and faculty use content recommendation tools with recommendations for how libraries and the scholarly communications community might respond.
The Future of Information Literacy in the Library: An Example of Librarian/Pu...NASIG
The last decade has seen immense growth in information sources and information output, which in turn has changed the way students and researchers find and use information. Following this, we’ve also seen a shift from the traditional “librarian as expert” role to the “librarian as teacher” role, where the imparting of information literacy skills and their embedding into the curriculum is recognized as a primary responsibility of today’s academic librarian.
This session will explore how librarians are becoming more involved with information literacy curriculum and how publishers can assist them, particularly regarding access to information and the scholarly publishing process.
In 2015 and early 2016, Rebecca Donlan, Assistant Director for Collection Management at Florida Gulf Coast University (FGCU), and Stacy Sieck, Library Communications Manager at Taylor & Francis Group, created and implemented an information literacy program for FCGU students and faculty that focuses specifically on navigating the scholarly publishing landscape.This collaborative project includes the creation and launch of webinars and online toolkits that provide tips and information on how to get published in academic journals, understanding the peer review process, navigating Open Access publishing, promoting and resuing your work, and more.
During this session, Rebecca and Stacy will provide an update on the status of their information literacy project, including user feedback, webinar usage statistics, and tips and best practices for recreating a similar program at different universities.
Speakers:
Rebecca Donlan, Assistant Director for Collection Management, Florida Gulf Coast University
Stacy V. Sieck, Library Communications Manager, The Americas, Taylor & Francis Group
Shaping Expectations: Defining and Refining the Role of Technical Services in...NASIG
From trial to implementation, technical services staff play an important role in shaping awareness of, and expectations for, new resources. Internally, technical services staff provide information and instruction to public services staff. Externally, they influence how new resources are integrated into the library website and other platforms. With appropriate “message control,” technical services staff can positively influence awareness of new resources while keeping everyone’s expectations in check.
During fall 2015, technical services staff at Georgia Southern University adopted a protocol for new resource rollouts that explicitly times and structures internal and external communications to ensure that all library staff are ready to support new resources as they go live. This protocol focuses on providing appropriate lead-time notifications to public services staff and “training the trainers” first, prior to releasing any external communications. Furthermore, this protocol integrates with activities of the library’s promotion committee, supporting smooth transition to public services promotion of new resources.
During this session, presenters will discuss this protocol in detail, with special emphasis on timing of internal and external communications, the importance of providing sufficient staff training and support materials early on, and the importance of maintaining objectivity and accuracy in all rollout communications and assets. Presenters will share protocol planning tools and worksheets, describe how these are integrated into implementation workflows, and engage participants in discussion about the role of technical services in new resource rollouts.
Presenters:
Jeff Mortimore & Debra Skinner
Zach S. Henderson Library
Georgia Southern University
Is what's 'trending' what¹s worth purchasing?NASIG
Presenters:
Stacy Konkiel, Outreach & Engagement Manager, Altmetric
Rachel Miles, Kansas State University Libraries
Sarah Sutton, Assistant Professor in the School of Library and Information Management at Emporia State University
New forms of usage data like altmetrics are helping librarians to make smarter decisions about their collections. A recent nationwide study administered to 13,000+ librarians at R1 universities shines light on exactly how these metrics are being applied in academia. This presentation will share survey results, including as-yet-unknown rates of technology and metrics uptake among collection development librarians, the most popular citation databases and altmetrics services being used to make decisions, and surprising factors that affect attitudes toward the use of metrics. This presentation will also offer actionable insights on how altmetrics are being paired with bibliometrics and usage statistics to form a more complete picture of “trending” scholarship that’s worth purchasing. Through sharing the survey results and opening up a discussion about the potential altmetrics hold for informing collection development, the presenters aim to provide a learning opportunity for attendees which will enhance their competencies for e-resource management, specifically, core competence for e-resource librarians 3.5, use of bibliometrics for collection assessment, and 3.7, identity and analyze emerging technologies.
The Canadian Linked Data Initiative: Charting a Path to a Linked Data FutureNASIG
As libraries prepare to shift away from MARC to a linked data framework, new convergences in the metadata production activities of our libraries' technical services units, special collections, and digital libraries are becoming possible. In September 2015, the Canadian Linked Data Initiative (CLDI) was formed to leverage the existing collaboration between the Technical Services departments of Canada’s top 5 research libraries and the Library and Archives of Canada. Working cooperatively, our objective is to provide a path to linked data readiness for our institutions and leadership for the adoption of linked data by libraries across Canada. To achieve this goal, partner libraries are working across departments and institutions to create new workflows and tools and adapt to a new conceptual understanding of descriptive metadata. This presentation is a preliminary report on the progress made in five key areas of interest: digital collections, education and training, MARC record enhancement, evaluation of linked data tools and vendor supplied metadata. Building on existing initiatives, the CLDI is investigating the potential of integrating linked data elements into digitized collections, as well as MARC-based bibliographic and authority records, with the aim of fostering new and interesting pathways for resource discovery. To strengthen and expand the professional knowledge of staff, partner institutions are collaborating in the production of educational and training materials related to linked data principles and practices. The evaluation and potential development of linked data tools is another area of concentration. Finally, with the goal of changing workflows upstream, the CLDI is working to engage publishers and vendors in the linked data conversation. In addition to reporting on the work undertaken in the first year of the project, this presentation will also cover lessons learned and outline some of the new opportunities gained from working on a collaborative project that spans across multiple boundaries.
Marlene van Ballegooie, Metadata Librarian,
University of Toronto
Juliya Borie, University of Toronto Libraries
Andrew Senior, Coordinator,
E-Resources and Serials, McGill University
Open Access in the World of Scholarly Journals: creation and discoveryNASIG
Access to scholarly journals produced by commercial publishers is becoming more and more expensive, and open access to publicly-funded research results is increasingly mandated by funding bodies. In response to these and other motivators, the open access scholarly journal movement is growing. In the Canadian context, open access publishing has begun to get more traction in response to these factors, and in spite of some resistance by researchers. University and college libraries are getting involved in both the promotion and the creation of open access content. An example of this is the University of Lethbridge Journal Incubator, which publishes three open access journals from the University Library. We will explore some of the benefits and drawbacks of open access in scholarly communications.
One model of open access is the hybrid journal, which causes particular challenges for discovery and access. With access restricted at the article, rather than the journal level, it's surprisingly hard to get library users to OA content through catalogs, link resolvers, or even discovery tools. Chris will investigate some of the roadblocks and consult with publishers, librarians, and service providers to see what is currently being done to overcome this challenge. Are readers currently getting to OA content in hybrid journals through library systems and sites? Is the NISO License and Access Indicators Recommended Practice likely to change current practices? How are discovery tool vendors responding to this challenge? Can service providers outside of the traditional library content and software sector have an impact? After investigating all of these angles Chris will try to determine if there is a likely way forward and share what attendees can do to improve access to Hybrid OA journals in the short and long term.
Sandra Cowan is the liaison librarian for English, Modern Languages, Religious Studies and the Faculty of Fine Arts at the University of Lethbridge in Alberta, Canada. She has research interests in digital humanities, scholarly communications, and research methods of creative workers.
Chris Bulock is the Electronic Resources Librarian at California State University Northridge. His research has focused on perpetual access, e-resource evaluation, and the effect of Open Access on collection development and e-resource management. He writes a column on OA issues in the Serials Review, and he is an incoming NASIG Member at Large.
We participated in an Information master's program assigned to a project in Trivandrum, India. We were tasked with providing assistance on the management of a library in a college specifializing in teaching Deaf students as well as research in Audiology and Speech Language Pathology. They have a very small collection of about 2000 books and 24 journals, and no website prior to our arrival.
Our understanding was that it would be difficult to make correct assumptions about the academic and technological environment given lack of experience in the region and the culture, as well as working with students with disabilities in general. We were not prepared for the rudimentary or non-existent policies and infrastructure that we met once we actually arrived. This presentation would detail the strategies of assessment and decision-making we employed to work with their available resources as well as deal with the lack of buy-in from various stakeholders. Among these include user interviews in translation, collecting and incorporating examples from other library sites in building a new website, and above all trying to figure out ways to communicate the importance of working with library online resources upon a population that is relatively new to them.
Presenters:
Jharina Pascual, Electronic Resources Acquisitions Librarian, University of California Irvine
Sybil Boone, University of Michigan School of Information
This webinar is based on experiences of working over the past two years with a number of further education (FE) colleges to help them increase engagement with digital resources and library services. It draws on the recommendations of a number of librarians/learning resources managers on how they have increased engagement with, and use of, their resources. The emphasis will be on non-technical approaches to enhance student experience, learning and teaching.
Lis Parcell will share recommendations which will be particularly useful for librarians and learning resources staff in FE colleges, but may also be of interest to staff working in smaller university library services. Participants will be encouraged to contribute their own views on the challenges they face in increasing engagement with their digital resources and library services. We will also highlight further support available from Jisc in this area. Lis will co-present with Elizabeth Newbold, Library Manager at Activate Learning.
Librarians are increasingly being asked to engage with
bibliometrics to help with institutional decision making.
However, few have professional qualifications in this area and
there is an onus on universities to do metrics responsibly. A
small project supported by the Lis-Bibliometrics forum and
Elsevier Research Intelligence Division is developing a set of
bibliometric competency statements to ensure practitioners are
equipped to do their work responsibly and well. This workshop
will report on progress to date and invite input into the project.
Presenters:
Patricia Cleary, Global eProduct Development Manager, Springer
Kristen Garlock, ITHAKA/JSTOR
Denise D Novak, Acquisitions Librarian, Carnegie Mellon University
Ethen Pullman, Carnegie Mellon University
Academic libraries and publishers are fielding an increasing number of faculty/researcher text mining requests. This program will address these needs and offer some best practices. Specific examples from academic libraries will highlight the administrative and technical issues, while the resource provider perspective will focus on the challenges of rights management clearance and how to deliver the information, as well as the publisher philosophy on supporting digital scholarship efforts. The session will capture the issues from both sides and provide attendees with a framework for handling requests at their own institutions. In keeping with the theme "Embracing New Horizons" we will use this time to explore possibilities for better communication around digital scholarship issues, and the development of best practices, through appropriate channels.
Transforming liaison roles for academic librarians is critical, as universities are moving to position themselves to meet the demands of a more competitive national research environment. At La Trobe University, librarians are repackaging current research support services to streamline and incorporate these more efficiently into the researcher’s life cycle, in order to support the University’s research initiatives
Objectives: To explore potential collaborations between academic libraries and Clinical Translational Science Award (CTSA)-funded institutes with respect to
data management training and support.
Methods: The National Institutes of Health CTSAs have established a well-funded, crucial infrastructure supporting large-scale collaborative biomedical research. This infrastructure is also valuable for smaller, more localized research projects. While infrastructure and corresponding support is often available for large, well-funded projects, these services have generally not been extended to smaller projects. This is a missed opportunity on both accounts. Academic libraries providing data services can leverage CTSA-based resources, while CTSA-funded institutes can extend their reach beyond large biomedical projectsto serve the long tail of research data.
Results: A year-long series of conversations with the Indiana CTSI Data Management Team resulted in resource sharing, consensus building about key issues in data management, provision of expert feedback on a data management training curriculum, and several avenues for future collaborations.
Conclusions:Data management training for graduate students and early career researchers is a vital area of need that would benefit from the combined infrastructure and expertise of translational science institutes and academic libraries. Such partnerships can leverage the instructional, preservation, and access expertise in academic libraries, along with the storage, security, and analytical expertise in translational science institutes to improve the management, protection, and access of valuable research data.
The session will present the key findings of a joint
Loughborough University and Taylor & Francis project
looking at postgraduate user experience in the digital
library. Using the findings from ten research students’
diaries collected over an eight-month period, we will focus
on the findings as they relate to the academic journal and
article including: evaluating different publishers’ platforms
and their UX; identifying the approaches and skills needed
in identifying papers relevant for their research; and
approaches to storing papers.
This presentation was provided by Lisa Hinchliffe of The University of Illinois, during Session Seven of the NISO event "Assessment Practices and Metrics for the 21st Century," held on December 13, 2019.
Presentation and workshop notes from session on how to apply the Researcher Development Framework to library and information service provision for research/e support
Uses case studies of different types of researchers.
Workshop notes integrated into the presentation
This presentation was provided by Pedro Reynoso of Chabot College, during the NISO training series "Assessment Practices and Metrics for the 21st Century (Session Two)," held on November 1, 2019.
This presentation was provided by Joyce Chapman and Emily Daly of Duke University, during Session One of the NISO training series "Assessment Practices and Metrics in a 21st Century Pandemic," held on September 18, 2020.
RDAP 16: Building the Research Data Community of PracticeASIS&T
Research Data Access and Preservation Summit, 2016
Atlanta, GA
May 4-7, 2016
Presenters:
Sherry Lake, University of Virginia
Brianna Marshall, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Regina Raboin, University of Massachusetts Medical School
Andrew Johnson, University of Colorado
Brian Westra, University of Oregon
Panel lead:
Cynthia Hudson-Vitale, Washington University in St. Louis
June 17, 2015
NISO Virtual Conference: The Eternal To-Do List: Making Ebooks work in Libraries
E-book Workflows: The Ongoing Challenges of Managing Materials and Improving Discoverability
Molly Beisler, MA, MLS, Head, Discovery Services, Mathewson-IGT Knowledge Center, University of Nevada
RDAP 16 Lightning: Data Practices and Perspectives of Atmospheric and Enginee...ASIS&T
Research Data Access and Preservation Summit, 2016
Atlanta, GA
May 4-7, 2016
Lightning Rounds (Thursday, May 5)
Presenter:
Christie Wiley, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
PhD students as a library user group are receiving increased
focus in the development of library services. In addition to
writing their doctoral thesis, they need to balance the roles
as ‘good academics’ and ‘good scientists’, and a key element
in this respect is raised awareness around academic integrity
and publication channels. In this breakout session, based on
experiences from our own teaching sessions, we discuss how
PhD students respond to these challenges, and which actions
should be taken by university libraries to help them meet the
expectations of present day academia.
Bridging the Gap: Sustaining Publication of a Newly Created Undergraduate Res...NASIG
Melissa Johnson, MLIS, MA
Assistant Professor
Assistant Director of Reference & Education Services
University Libraries, Reese Library
AUGUSTA UNIVERSITY
Once the excitement of creating a new journal has waned and publication has begun, a new challenge arises in sustainability. Augusta University first published their undergraduate research journal, Arsenal, through their institutional repository managed by the University Libraries in 2016. The Arsenal (ISSN 2380-5064 online) is a peer-reviewed, open-access interdisciplinary publication that is dedicated to publishing manuscripts resulting from Augusta University undergraduate research. Each paper published in the Arsenal undergoes a peer review process facilitated by the journal‘s Student Editorial Review Board and must be approved by an appointed faculty reviewer in the paper’s respective discipline. It is a student-run journal sponsored by the Center for Undergraduate Research & Scholarship (CURS) and published and managed by the University Libraries. The Arsenal serves as a great impetus for developing careers of nascent researchers.
Since the journal’s first publication in 2016, however, several unanticipated factors arose that have influenced continued publication. Some of these factors include changes on the student editorial board, faculty turnover, research agendas for mentoring faculty, and IRB requirements. Librarians from Augusta University will discuss some of the challenges that arose since initial publication and how the library adapted to these challenges. They will also discuss ways the library is bridging gaps to ensure continued publication of the journal, such as increasing marketing and promotion of the Arsenal to faculty and students, as well as developing further relationships with student organizations to ensure the Arsenal’s student-centered focus.
Librarians are increasingly being asked to engage with
bibliometrics to help with institutional decision making.
However, few have professional qualifications in this area and
there is an onus on universities to do metrics responsibly. A
small project supported by the Lis-Bibliometrics forum and
Elsevier Research Intelligence Division is developing a set of
bibliometric competency statements to ensure practitioners are
equipped to do their work responsibly and well. This workshop
will report on progress to date and invite input into the project.
Presenters:
Patricia Cleary, Global eProduct Development Manager, Springer
Kristen Garlock, ITHAKA/JSTOR
Denise D Novak, Acquisitions Librarian, Carnegie Mellon University
Ethen Pullman, Carnegie Mellon University
Academic libraries and publishers are fielding an increasing number of faculty/researcher text mining requests. This program will address these needs and offer some best practices. Specific examples from academic libraries will highlight the administrative and technical issues, while the resource provider perspective will focus on the challenges of rights management clearance and how to deliver the information, as well as the publisher philosophy on supporting digital scholarship efforts. The session will capture the issues from both sides and provide attendees with a framework for handling requests at their own institutions. In keeping with the theme "Embracing New Horizons" we will use this time to explore possibilities for better communication around digital scholarship issues, and the development of best practices, through appropriate channels.
Transforming liaison roles for academic librarians is critical, as universities are moving to position themselves to meet the demands of a more competitive national research environment. At La Trobe University, librarians are repackaging current research support services to streamline and incorporate these more efficiently into the researcher’s life cycle, in order to support the University’s research initiatives
Objectives: To explore potential collaborations between academic libraries and Clinical Translational Science Award (CTSA)-funded institutes with respect to
data management training and support.
Methods: The National Institutes of Health CTSAs have established a well-funded, crucial infrastructure supporting large-scale collaborative biomedical research. This infrastructure is also valuable for smaller, more localized research projects. While infrastructure and corresponding support is often available for large, well-funded projects, these services have generally not been extended to smaller projects. This is a missed opportunity on both accounts. Academic libraries providing data services can leverage CTSA-based resources, while CTSA-funded institutes can extend their reach beyond large biomedical projectsto serve the long tail of research data.
Results: A year-long series of conversations with the Indiana CTSI Data Management Team resulted in resource sharing, consensus building about key issues in data management, provision of expert feedback on a data management training curriculum, and several avenues for future collaborations.
Conclusions:Data management training for graduate students and early career researchers is a vital area of need that would benefit from the combined infrastructure and expertise of translational science institutes and academic libraries. Such partnerships can leverage the instructional, preservation, and access expertise in academic libraries, along with the storage, security, and analytical expertise in translational science institutes to improve the management, protection, and access of valuable research data.
The session will present the key findings of a joint
Loughborough University and Taylor & Francis project
looking at postgraduate user experience in the digital
library. Using the findings from ten research students’
diaries collected over an eight-month period, we will focus
on the findings as they relate to the academic journal and
article including: evaluating different publishers’ platforms
and their UX; identifying the approaches and skills needed
in identifying papers relevant for their research; and
approaches to storing papers.
This presentation was provided by Lisa Hinchliffe of The University of Illinois, during Session Seven of the NISO event "Assessment Practices and Metrics for the 21st Century," held on December 13, 2019.
Presentation and workshop notes from session on how to apply the Researcher Development Framework to library and information service provision for research/e support
Uses case studies of different types of researchers.
Workshop notes integrated into the presentation
This presentation was provided by Pedro Reynoso of Chabot College, during the NISO training series "Assessment Practices and Metrics for the 21st Century (Session Two)," held on November 1, 2019.
This presentation was provided by Joyce Chapman and Emily Daly of Duke University, during Session One of the NISO training series "Assessment Practices and Metrics in a 21st Century Pandemic," held on September 18, 2020.
RDAP 16: Building the Research Data Community of PracticeASIS&T
Research Data Access and Preservation Summit, 2016
Atlanta, GA
May 4-7, 2016
Presenters:
Sherry Lake, University of Virginia
Brianna Marshall, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Regina Raboin, University of Massachusetts Medical School
Andrew Johnson, University of Colorado
Brian Westra, University of Oregon
Panel lead:
Cynthia Hudson-Vitale, Washington University in St. Louis
June 17, 2015
NISO Virtual Conference: The Eternal To-Do List: Making Ebooks work in Libraries
E-book Workflows: The Ongoing Challenges of Managing Materials and Improving Discoverability
Molly Beisler, MA, MLS, Head, Discovery Services, Mathewson-IGT Knowledge Center, University of Nevada
RDAP 16 Lightning: Data Practices and Perspectives of Atmospheric and Enginee...ASIS&T
Research Data Access and Preservation Summit, 2016
Atlanta, GA
May 4-7, 2016
Lightning Rounds (Thursday, May 5)
Presenter:
Christie Wiley, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
PhD students as a library user group are receiving increased
focus in the development of library services. In addition to
writing their doctoral thesis, they need to balance the roles
as ‘good academics’ and ‘good scientists’, and a key element
in this respect is raised awareness around academic integrity
and publication channels. In this breakout session, based on
experiences from our own teaching sessions, we discuss how
PhD students respond to these challenges, and which actions
should be taken by university libraries to help them meet the
expectations of present day academia.
Bridging the Gap: Sustaining Publication of a Newly Created Undergraduate Res...NASIG
Melissa Johnson, MLIS, MA
Assistant Professor
Assistant Director of Reference & Education Services
University Libraries, Reese Library
AUGUSTA UNIVERSITY
Once the excitement of creating a new journal has waned and publication has begun, a new challenge arises in sustainability. Augusta University first published their undergraduate research journal, Arsenal, through their institutional repository managed by the University Libraries in 2016. The Arsenal (ISSN 2380-5064 online) is a peer-reviewed, open-access interdisciplinary publication that is dedicated to publishing manuscripts resulting from Augusta University undergraduate research. Each paper published in the Arsenal undergoes a peer review process facilitated by the journal‘s Student Editorial Review Board and must be approved by an appointed faculty reviewer in the paper’s respective discipline. It is a student-run journal sponsored by the Center for Undergraduate Research & Scholarship (CURS) and published and managed by the University Libraries. The Arsenal serves as a great impetus for developing careers of nascent researchers.
Since the journal’s first publication in 2016, however, several unanticipated factors arose that have influenced continued publication. Some of these factors include changes on the student editorial board, faculty turnover, research agendas for mentoring faculty, and IRB requirements. Librarians from Augusta University will discuss some of the challenges that arose since initial publication and how the library adapted to these challenges. They will also discuss ways the library is bridging gaps to ensure continued publication of the journal, such as increasing marketing and promotion of the Arsenal to faculty and students, as well as developing further relationships with student organizations to ensure the Arsenal’s student-centered focus.
The presentation showcases a draft of a comprehensive honors research framework recently published in JNCHC and refined during the European Honors Conference in Utrecht. .
RDAP 15: Growing an Undergraduate DIL Support Program at University of Cincin...ASIS&T
Research Data Access and Preservation Summit, 2015
Minneapolis, MN
APril 22-23, 2015
Part of “Developing Data Literacy Programs: Working with Faculty, Graduate Students and Undergraduates”
Amy Koshoffer, Science Informationist, University of Cincinnati
By Chenjerai Mabhiza, Head of User Services at the University of Namibia
17 February 2017- 15:00 CET
--The webinar was held as part of ASIRA (Access to Scientific Information Resources in Agriculture) Online Course for Low-Income Countries--
Presented at GaCOMO15 by Ashley Lowery and Debra Skinner.
The institutional repository Digital Commons@Georgia Southern launched in Fall 2013. Faculty immediately began to utilize the services including journals/conferences sites and SelectedWorks faculty profiles. The repository also sparked an unexpected success: collaboration between the Zach S. Henderson Library and the Office of Research. The Office of Research created an Expertise Search and purchased Plum Analytics, two services that integrate with Selected Works profiles.
Enhancing Librarians’ Research Skills: A Professional Development ProgramIRDL
Institute of Research Design for Librarianship (IRDL), is a three-year project funded by the Institute of Museum and Library Services in the United States, which seeks to provide professional development opportunities and a support system for academic librarians who want to improve their research skills and increase their research output. We have recently completed the first nine-day Institute for 25 librarians from all over the country, and we would like to share our experience with the international community, hoping to generate more interest and encourage more discussion on practitioner research in LIS.
*** Presented at the Library 2.014 Conference on October 8, 2014. The recording of the session is available at https://sas.elluminate.com/site/external/recording/playback/link/table/dropin?sid=2008350&suid=D.2D7040A7156F9544A91E1BDFA52A25. ***
What support is being provided to researchers? A view from a universityUoLResearchSupport
Short presentation on Friday 26th December as part of the FAIRsFAIR workshop: Advancing the skills agenda for reproducibility, open and FAIR. A virtual National Roadshow from FAIRsFAIR
The Role of an Information Literacy Award as part of an Undergraduate Researc...sshujah
Digging Deeper: The Role of an Information Literacy Award as part of an Undergraduate Research Fair to Profile and E-valuate Students' Information Literacy Skills at York University
Presented at WILU 2014 at Western University, London, Ontario by Sophie Bury, Dana Craig, and Sarah Shujah
cIRcle is UBC’s open and digital repository for showcasing your research and teaching materials to the world. Whether you are a faculty, staff, post-doc, graduate, or undergraduate student at UBC, cIRcle is your database! This presentation showcased some exciting work at UBC by student and faculty researchers and how it can be accessed on cIRcle. The speakers also presented some of the benefits of including your work in UBC’s digital repository, and some awards that you could be eligible to win as a student, faculty or staff member. This session took place on October 21, 2010 in the Lillooet Room of the Irving K. Barber Learning Centre at the University of British Columbia. [Note: The PDF file contains an embedded video on slide 42 which is available as a separate mp4 file below].
Faculty of Humanities, University of Manchester postgraduate research open da...Anusarin Lowe
Learn about doing a PhD in humanities and social science at the University of Manchester - what it entails, support available and development opportunities.
Faculty of Humanities, University of Manchester postgraduate research open day 2017
Presentation delivered by cIRcle staff for graduate student series at UBC Library on Scholarly Rights and Responsibilities. Topics include publisher agreements, author rights, benefits of using cIRcle, UBC's digital repository .
Ithaka S+R | Jisc | RLUK UK Survey of Academics 2012Jisc
The UK Survey of Academics 2012, conducted by Ithaka S+R, Jisc, and Research Libraries UK (RLUK), examines the attitudes and behaviours of academics at higher education institutions across the United Kingdom.
Similar to Embracing Undergraduate Research; Creating the 'Arsenal' (20)
Ctrl + Alt + Repeat: Strategies for Regaining Authority Control after a Migra...NASIG
Speaker: Jamie Carlstone
This presentation is on how to regain authority control in a large research library catalog: first, dealing with a backlog of problems from years without authority control and second, creating a process for ongoing workflows to realistically maintain authority control when new records are added to the collection.
The Serial Cohort: A Confederacy of CatalogersNASIG
Speaker: Mandy Hurt
In 2018, at a time when our department was shrinking through attrition, the decision was made to further leverage the particular skill sets of a select group of monographic catalogers by training them to also undertake the complex copy cataloging of serials.
This presentation concerns the assumptions underlying how this decision was originally made, the initial plan for how this would be accomplished by CONSER Bridge Training, the eventual formation of the Serials Cohort with a view to creating an iterative process I would design and manage, and the problems, obstacles and time constraints faced and addressed along the way.
Calculating how much your University spends on Open Access and what to do abo...NASIG
Librarians are working hard to understand how much money their university is spending on open access article processing fees (APCs), and how much of what they subscribe to is available as OA. This information is useful when making subscription decisions, considering Read and Publish agreements, rethinking library open access budgets, and designing Institution-wide OA policies.
This session will talk concretely about how to calculate the impact of Open Access on *your* university. It will provide an overview on how to estimate the amount of money spent across a university on Open Access fees: we will discuss underlying concepts behind calculating OA article-processing fee (APC) spend and give an overview of useful data sources, including:
FlourishOA
Microsoft Academic Graph
PLOS API
Unpaywall Journals
We will also talk about Open Access on the subscription side, including how much of what you subscribe to is available as open access and how you can use that in your subscription decisions and negotiations.
The presenters are the cofounders of Our Research, the nonprofit company behind Unpaywall, the primary source of Open Access data worldwide.
Heather Piwowar, Co-founder, Our Research
Jason Priem, Co-founder, Our Research
Measure Twice and Cut Once: How a Budget Cut Impacted Subscription Renewals f...NASIG
Speakers: Ilda Cardenas, Keri Prelitz, Greg Yorba
The process of looking at subscriptions with the goal of proactively downsizing revealed that the library’s existing renewal workflows were outdated and in need of regular analysis to identify underused resources. Additionally, this project uncovered shortcomings of analysis that is reliant on usage data, the unexpected ramifications of large-scale subscription cancellations, as well as the need for improved communication within and between the many library departments affected by subscription cancellations.
Analyzing workflows and improving communication across departments NASIG
Presented by Jharina Pascual and Sarah Wallbank.
The presentation provides people with simple techniques for analyzing their local workflow and information-sharing practices, some ideas for interrogating and improving intra-technical services communication, and ideas for simple changes that can improve communication and build a sense of community/joint purpose within or across departments.
Supporting Students: OER and Textbook Affordability Initiatives at a Mid-Size...NASIG
Presented by Jennifer L. Pate.
With support from the president and provost of the university, Collier Library adopted strategic purchasing initiatives, including database purchases to support specific courses as well as purchasing reserve copies of textbooks for high-enrollment, required classes. In addition, the scholarly communications librarian became a founding member of the OER workgroup on campus. This group’s mission is to direct efforts for increasing faculty awareness and adoption of OER. This presentation discusses the structure of the each of these programs from initial idea to implementation. Included will be discussions of assessment of faculty and student awareness, development of an OER grant program, starting a textbook purchasing program, promotion of efforts, funding, and future goals.
Access to Supplemental Journal Article Materials NASIG
Presented by Electra Enslow, Suzanne Fricke, Susan Shipman
The use of supplemental journal article materials is increasing in all disciplines. These materials may be datasets, source code, tables/figures, multimedia or other materials that previously went unpublished, were attached as appendices, or were included within the body of the work. Current emphasis on critical appraisal and reproducibility demands that researchers have access to the complete shared life cycle in order to fully evaluate research. As more libraries become dependent on secondary aggregators and interlibrary loan, we questioned if access to these materials is equitable and sustainable.
Communications and context: strategies for onboarding new e-resources librari...NASIG
Presented by Bonnie Thornton.
This presentation details onboarding strategies institutions can utilize to help acclimate new e-resources librarians with an emphasis on strategies for effectively establishing and perpetuating communications with stakeholders.
Full Text Coverage Ratios: A Simple Method of Article-Level Collections Analy...NASIG
Presented by Matthew Goddard.
his presentation describes a simple and efficient method of using a discovery layer to evaluate periodicals holdings at the article level, and suggest a variety of applications.
Web accessibility in the institutional repository crafting user centered sub...NASIG
Presented by Jenny Hoops and Margaret McLaughlin.
As web accessibility initiatives increase across institutions, it is important not only to reframe and rethink policies, but also to develop sustainable and tenable methods for enforcing accessibility efforts. For institutional repositories, it is imperative to determine the extent to which both the repository manager and the user are responsible for depositing accessible content. This presentation allows us to share our accessibility framework and help repository and content managers craft sustainable, long-term goals for accessible content in institutional repositories, while also providing openly available resources for short-term benefit.
Linked Data is exploding in the library world, but the biggest problems libraries have are coming up with the time or money involved in converting their records, looking into Linked Data programs, finding community support, and all the various other issues that arise as part of developing new methods. Likewise, one of the biggest hurdles for libraries and linked data is that they do not know what to do to get involved. As we have fewer people available and smaller budgets each year, we would like to explore ways in which libraries can get involved in the process without expending an undue amount of their already dwindling resources. To see how linked data can be applied, we will look at the example of the Smithsonian Libraries (SIL). Over the past 18 months, SIL has been preparing for the transition from MARC to linked open data. This session will talk about various SIL projects and initiatives (such as the FAST headings project and the introduction of Wikidata and WikiBase); how to incorporate linked data elements into MARC records; and how to develop staff and give them proficiency with new tools and workflows.
Heidy Berthoud, Head, Resource Description, Smithsonian Libraries
Walk this way: Online content platform migration experiences and collaboration NASIG
In this session, a librarian and a publisher share their perspectives on content platform migrations, and the Working Group Co-chairs will describe the group’s efforts to-date and expected outcomes. Our publisher-side speaker will describe issues they must consider when their content migrates, such as providing continuous access, persistent linking, communicating with stakeholders, and working with vendors. Our librarian speaker will describe their experience and steps they take during migrations, such as receiving notifications about migrations, identifying affected e-resources, updating local systems to ensure continuous access, and communicating with their front-line staff and patrons.
Read & Publish – What It Takes to Implement a Seamless Model?NASIG
PANELISTS
Adam Chesler
Director of Global Sales
AIP Publishing
Sara Rotjan
Assistant Marketing Director, AIP Publishing
Keith Webster
Dean of Libraries and Director of Emerging and Integrative Media Initiatives
Carnegie Mellon University
Andre Anders
Director, Leibniz Institute of Surface Engineering (IOM)
Editor in Chief of Journal of Applied Physics
Professor of Applied Physics, Leipzig University
“Read & Publish” agreements continue to gain global attention. What’s rarely discussed when these new access and article processing models are introduced is the paperwork, back-end technology and overall management required to implement the new program that works for all involved. This panel, comprised of a librarian, publisher, and researcher, will focus on the complexities of developing, implementing and using the infrastructures of different Read & Publish models and the challenges of developing a seamless experience for everyone.
From article submission to publication to final reporting, the panel will discuss the “hidden” impact that new workflows will have on stakeholders in scholarly communications. Time will be allotted for Q&A and attendee participation is encouraged.
When to hold them when to fold them: reassessing big deals in 2020NASIG
This presentation goes into details for each of the publishers’ big deals that we examined and present reasons as to why we cancelled them, with concrete examples from our experiences (four cancellations and two restructurings).
Getting on the Same Page: Aligning ERM and LIbGuides ContentNASIG
This presentation gives background on the development of the initial processes, the review and revision of the processes,and the issues encountered in developing a workflow for importing data from one system to the other.
A multi-institutional model for advancing open access journals and reclaiming...NASIG
The presenters will provide brief overviews of CIL and PDXScholar, and they will detail the challenges and ultimate successes of this multi-institutional model for advancing open access journals and reclaiming control of the scholarly record.
Knowledge Bases: The Heart of Resource ManagementNASIG
This session will discuss the knowledge base metadata lifecycle, current and upcoming metadata standards, and the effect that knowledge bases have on discovery and e-resource management. The presenters will look at ways knowledge bases can be leveraged to create downstream tools for resource management and discovery. The session will also provide different perspectives on knowledge bases, including from librarians and product managers, as well as a discussion of the NISO's KBART Automation recommended practice and what this could mean for knowledge bases in the future. The session will also include a conversation regarding how leveraging knowledge bases can aid librarians in improving resource discovery within their own libraries and ultimately decrease the amount of time spent on metadata workflows. Through this presentation, we also aim to improve communication between the library community and metadata providers and creators.
Elizabeth Levkoff Derouchie, Metadata Librarian for Serials & Electronic Resources, Samford University Library
Beth Ashmore, Associate Head, Acquisitions & Discovery (Serials), North Carolina State University
Eric Van Gorden, Product Manager, EBSCO
This session will talk about various SIL projects and initiatives (such as the FAST headings project and the introduction of Wikidata and WikiBase); how to incorporate linked data elements into MARC records; and how to develop staff and give them proficiency with new tools and workflows.
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxtimhan337
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfkaushalkr1407
The Roman Empire, a vast and enduring power, stands as one of history's most remarkable civilizations, leaving an indelible imprint on the world. It emerged from the Roman Republic, transitioning into an imperial powerhouse under the leadership of Augustus Caesar in 27 BCE. This transformation marked the beginning of an era defined by unprecedented territorial expansion, architectural marvels, and profound cultural influence.
The empire's roots lie in the city of Rome, founded, according to legend, by Romulus in 753 BCE. Over centuries, Rome evolved from a small settlement to a formidable republic, characterized by a complex political system with elected officials and checks on power. However, internal strife, class conflicts, and military ambitions paved the way for the end of the Republic. Julius Caesar’s dictatorship and subsequent assassination in 44 BCE created a power vacuum, leading to a civil war. Octavian, later Augustus, emerged victorious, heralding the Roman Empire’s birth.
Under Augustus, the empire experienced the Pax Romana, a 200-year period of relative peace and stability. Augustus reformed the military, established efficient administrative systems, and initiated grand construction projects. The empire's borders expanded, encompassing territories from Britain to Egypt and from Spain to the Euphrates. Roman legions, renowned for their discipline and engineering prowess, secured and maintained these vast territories, building roads, fortifications, and cities that facilitated control and integration.
The Roman Empire’s society was hierarchical, with a rigid class system. At the top were the patricians, wealthy elites who held significant political power. Below them were the plebeians, free citizens with limited political influence, and the vast numbers of slaves who formed the backbone of the economy. The family unit was central, governed by the paterfamilias, the male head who held absolute authority.
Culturally, the Romans were eclectic, absorbing and adapting elements from the civilizations they encountered, particularly the Greeks. Roman art, literature, and philosophy reflected this synthesis, creating a rich cultural tapestry. Latin, the Roman language, became the lingua franca of the Western world, influencing numerous modern languages.
Roman architecture and engineering achievements were monumental. They perfected the arch, vault, and dome, constructing enduring structures like the Colosseum, Pantheon, and aqueducts. These engineering marvels not only showcased Roman ingenuity but also served practical purposes, from public entertainment to water supply.
Embracing Undergraduate Research; Creating the 'Arsenal'
1. Embracing Undergraduate
Research: Creating the Arsenal
Abigail Drescher, MA
Center for Undergraduate Research
& Scholarship
Augusta University
Melissa Johnson, MLIS
Reese Library
Augusta University
Kim Mears, MLIS
Robert Greenblatt, MD Library
Augusta University
31st Annual NASIG Conference
Embracing New Horizons
Albuquerque, NM
June 10, 2016
8. University Strategic Priority
SP 3: Be a Nationally & Internationally Recognized Leader in
Research, Discovery, And Scholarship
SP 3: Organizational Goal 4
Promote a culture of undergraduate and graduate student research.
Augusta University embraces a culture of student research, supporting
efforts to grow undergraduate research. We are devoted to encouraging
collaborative research between faculty and students throughout the
enterprise. We encourage original research and creative activity by
students in all areas and disciplines of the University
9. Center for Undergraduate Research
• Started in 2007
• Supports faculty-led research
and scholarly activity with
undergraduates at Augusta
University
• Brown Bag Seminar Series
• Promotes culture of UR at AU
• Works closely with the AU
Honors Program
10. Summer Scholars
• 6 Weeks during Summer Semester
• Faculty submit proposals for projects
• Students must apply for program
• Receive stipend for 20 hours per week of
research
– Heroes and Villains
– Pancreatic Cancer
– Police Perception after Ferguson
11. On the
Shoulders of
Giants
• Student organization
• Student majors from
various departments
• Psychological Sciences
• Biological Sciences
• Political Science
• Vision
• Student reviewers
CURS Student Organization:
On the Shoulders of Giants
14. Resources Consulted
• Council on Undergraduate Research
(CUR)
– Cur.org
• "How to Start an Undergraduate
Research Journal"
– D. Alexis Hart
• “Undergraduate Research Offices &
Programs: Models & Practices”
– Edited by Joyce Kinkead and
Linda Blockus
Image Source: Alexandre Duret-Lutz, https://flic.kr/p/uiC8U, (CC-BY-SA 2.0)
16. Student Publishing
• Entering into a (discipline-based) research community
• Intellectual value to students of writing and rewriting in a
public forum.
• Seeing the student as a producer of knowledge.
• Faculty & student engagement outside of the classroom
• The value of making student research public.
(Hart 2012, 5-7)
17. Reviewing Options for Publication
• Examples of Augusta University publications
• Discuss publishing possibilities
– Print vs. Online
– Academic vs. Creative
18. Other Universities with URJs
• Georgia Tech
• UGA
• University of North Georgia
• Appalachian State
• University of Pittsburgh
• Furman
19. • Journal for Undergraduate Research Opportunities (JURO)
• Began in 2001
• Journal Staff – Students
• Faculty – Editors in chief
• Published annually – yearly CURO conference presentations
• 2010 issue published to website - http://juro.uga.edu/
• Now published as one PDF
• http://curo.uga.edu/sites/default/files/docs/juro/Final_JURO_2015.pdf
20. University of North Georgia
• University of North Georgia
• Began in 2012
• Faculty Editors/Student authors
• Digital Commons BePress
• Use BookLogix to print entire issue
• Individual articles indexed
• Regional
• Research and creative works
• http://digitalcommons.northgeorgia.edu/papersandpubs/
21. Furman University
• Electronic Journal of Undergraduate
Mathematics
• Online-only
• BePress
• Students must have sponsor
• Faculty – Editor
• http://scholarexchange.furman.edu/fuejum/
22. Georgia Tech
• Began in 2008
• Biannually – print and electronic
• Accepts rolling submissions from undergraduates at GT
• Uses Website – individual articles available or whole PDF
• 2013 – published articles in conjunction with MIT
• Student Run
• www.gttower.org
23. • Appalachian State
• “Edited by undergraduates with the help of a faculty
board”
• Annual publication
• Began in 2004
• Electronic publication
• One PDF
• “EBSCOhost Discovery Service”
• Part of university website -
http://historymatters.appstate.edu/
24. University of Pittsburgh
• Forbes & Fifth
• Student Run
• Published Spring & Fall
• Print & Electronic - CC-BY
• Research and Creative
Works (Interdisciplinary
Collaboration)
• D-Scribe Digital Publishing
thru library
http://www.asundergrad.pitt.edu/our/forbes-fifth-journal
25. Traditional
Publication
Web hosting: $$$
Submission and peer review
workflow system: $$
CLOCKSS archival service:
$$$
Arsenal Journal
in Repository
Web hosting: FREE
Submission and peer review
workflow through various
systems: FREE
Archival service through
repository: FREE
Publishing Models
26. Researched other models of journal hosting
– Coyote Papers (University of Arizona)
– Transforming Education (Augusta University)
– Metadata (Dublin Core)
Publishing in the Repository
32. • to promote and highlight the undergraduate research
from a wide range of disciplines conducted at Augusta
University
• Facilitate scholarly collaborations between students
and faculty
• Expose students to the publication and peer review
process
Arsenal: The UR Journal of
Augusta University
33. Aims and Scope
• To represent and highlight undergraduate research of academic and
scholarly value from a wide range of disciplines at Augusta University
• To involve undergraduate students in the peer review process under the
guidance of faculty mentors
• To provide an opportunity for undergraduate students to prepare research
and scholarly papers for publication
• To create an outlet for undergraduate research to be presented in a
professional environment
• To create a platform for undergraduate research to gain recognition for their
achievements
• To enhance students’ qualifications for career and academic goals post-
graduation
A section of the journal will be dedicated to listing undergraduate scholarly
work that has been presented in non-manuscript format by AU students.
35. Metadata
• Author: LastName, FirstName
• Affiliation: Student(s)
Department
• Title of Work
• Abstract
• Subjects (keywords and LC
Subject Headings)
• Student’s advisor
• Date of publication or
distribution
• Sponsor (if funded)
• DOI
• Series/Report No.
36. ISSN
Maintains metadata on Journal
– name
– format
– publisher
– frequency
– price
– url
Provide link to published issue
http://www.loc.gov/issn
37. DOI
• Digital Object Identifier
• CrossRef Member
• Charge per article
• http://www.crossref.org/
38. Copyright
• Author’s Rights
• Creative Commons
– Attribution
– Non-commercial
– No derivatives
Image Source: Public Domain, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright#/media/File:Copyright.svg
41. Submission Guidelines
(Created by student organization and program coordinator)
• Must be student at Augusta University
• Students must be primary author
• No previously published works or works submitted elsewhere
• Establish Format
– Style: APA (American Psychological Association), 6th Edition,
12 pt. Times New Roman font, double spaced, 1 inch margins
– Language: English
– File Format: Microsoft Word
– Abstract: 150-250 words
– Length: 2,000 - 6,000 words
42. Criteria for Acceptance
• Created by student organization and program organization
• Rubric created by student organization
• Example of content:
– Title
• How relevant is the title to the content?
– Abstract
• Does the depth of the abstract relate to the depth of the paper?
• Is the information provided in the abstract a good summary of
the paper?
• Is the abstract concise?
– Introduction
• Is there sufficient information in the introduction?
• Is there a clear hypothesis or purpose that relates to the
research?
46. Blind Peer Review
AUTHOR(S)
FACULTY ADVISOR
MANAGING
EDITOR
OSG PRESIDENT/
VICE PRESIDENT
ON THE SHOULDERS
OF GIANTS
FACULTY
REVIEWER
STUDENT
REVIEWER
47. Peer Reviewers
• Collaboration between faculty and student to
complete peer review and recommend
decision
– On the Shoulders of Giants Members
– Major/Minor in subject area
• Decision
– Accept / Accept with Revisions / Reject
48. Editorial Board
3 Faculty Members
– Campus Faculty Members
– 2 Librarians
– President and Vice President of student organization
49. Editorial Process
• Step 1: New submission
• Step 2: Blinding
• Step 3: Select the reviewer
• Step 4: Acceptance or Rejection
• Step 5: Author Revision
• Step 6: Resubmission
• Step 7: Copyediting and Proofreading
• Step 8: Typesetting
• Step 9: Publication
51. Supporting students
• How to write for publication
• Style and formatting guidelines
• Literature searching
• FAQs
52. Call for papers
• Table at ClubFest
• Posted on “Stall Wall”
• First Call for Papers –
January 2016
• 6 submissions
Image source: ashley.adcox, https://flic.kr/p/4FxXpX (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)
53. Copyediting
• Correct grammar and
punctuation mistakes
• Ensure that spelling is correct
and consistent and follows
journal style
• Ensure that the paper is
properly referenced using
APA 6th edition
• Cross-check the references
and any tables and figures
Image source: Benjamin Solah , https://flic.kr/p/6oDVX2, (CC BY-NC 2.0)
54. Typesetting
Creating an article layout and template
– Whitespace
– Columns
– Margins
– Page number placement
– Font
– Headings/subheadings
55. Publishing the First Issue
• Goal: publish by end of
Summer 2016
Image source: SierraTierra, https://flic.kr/p/8nEGtU (CC BY 2.0)
60. Future Directions
• Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
• Subscription Notifications
• Faculty Buy-In
• Marketing
• Indexing
61. References
Council of Undergraduate Research. (2016). Council on Undergraduate Research.
Retrieved from www.cur.org
Hart, Alexis D. (2012). How to Start an Undergraduate Research Journal.
Washington, DC: Council on Undergraduate Research.
Kinkead, J., & Blockus, L. (Eds.). (2012). Undergraduate Research Offices &
Programs: Models & Practices. Washington, DC: Council on
Undergraduate Research.
Developed in partnership with the Georgia Knowledge Repository project, which was funded by a grant from the Institute for Museum and Library Services
All works entered into Scholarly Commons are processed in accordance with national and international standards for open access digital repositories
Records included in OAIster
LOCKSS preservation (?? Need to confirm)
Current President approached Abigail about starting UR journal and On the Shoulders was born – chartered through Student Activities as a student organization so they are able to utilize some of the services provided by Student Activities including funding trips to present research
Understanding of Publication Process
Maintain University’s Repository
Research and Editing Experience
Previous Journal Creation Knowledge
Completely student run with very little faculty engagement
Completely faculty run with students only as authors
Hybrid concept; faculty and students working together on an editorial board
Oftentimes journals start one way and evolve over time to include or reduce one group’s involvement
Creating/partnering with a student organization = $$$
Online only / Hard copy only
Hardcopy and online
Sometimes offered as class credit or an entire class dedicated to publishing the journal
Completely student run with very little faculty engagement
Completely faculty run with students only as authors
Hybrid concept; faculty and students working together on an editorial board
Oftentimes journals start one way and evolve over time to include or reduce one group’s involvement
Creating/partnering with a student organization = $$$
Online only / Hard copy only
Hardcopy and online
Sometimes offered as class credit or an entire class dedicated to publishing the journal
The Tower entered a formal article exchange partnership with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Undergraduate Research Journal (MURJ). The goal of the partnership is to continue to foster undergraduate scholarship in research and allow for further collaboration between Georgia Tech and MIT.
Contains
Journal Information
Submission Guidelines
Criteria for Acceptance
Review Process
Student Resources
FAQ
Style: APA (American Psychological Association), 6th Edition, 12 pt. Times New Roman font, double spaced, 1 inch margins
Language: English
File Format: Microsoft Word
Abstract: 150-250 words
Length: 2,000 - 6,000 words
Submitters must upload a separate title page including author's name, affiliation, mailing address, telephone number, and email address. No identifying information should be included in the original manuscript.
If submitting images, provide clear images that are of the best quality for your discipline and submission. Embed images in the document where you would like them to be placed
Online and open access
Authors retain copyright of their works. Articles are published with the Creative Commons License Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND)
Students are the only authors; faculty will be listed as a faculty mentor
Should encourage students to publish to other journals when appropriate
Created Submission Form
Metadata
WuFoo Online Form
Worked with IT to create new email
Faculty publication opportunities, credibility of submissions, reputation