Databases are collections of materials from magazines, academic journals, books, and reference works that have been made accessible online. Any Queens Library member with a library card and PIN number can access these databases 24 hours a day, 7 days a week from the Queens Library website. These databases provide access to articles, book entries, and other resources written by scholars and authors that students can cite directly in their research papers rather than citing websites. The databases cover topics such as opposing viewpoints on issues, literature, biographies, and general reference materials for students.
Discover the Power Inside Web of ScienceMaira Bundza
The document summarizes research conducted to analyze Eastern Michigan University faculty publications and citations between 2005-2007. Researchers retrieved article and citation data for EMU authors from the Web of Science database. They surveyed EMU faculty authors and interviewed a sample. The analysis found that 121 EMU faculty published 244 articles in 209 unique journals, 87.56% of which the university library owned. The most frequently cited journals were also identified. Faculty responses indicated the library resources were generally adequate but could be improved with additional online journals and resources.
This document summarizes different types of open access publishing models and provides information about publishing open access journals at the University of Western Sydney (UWS). It discusses gold, green, and hybrid open access models. It also provides details on funds available at UWS to cover article processing fees for open access publication, how to search for open access journals, and UWS's own open access journals.
Nancy Jeu from the Friends of the Oakland Public Library presented on bringing self-service options to the Oakland Public Library. Due to decreased funding, the library has faced staff reductions which has negatively impacted services. Self-service technologies like RFID and a mobile checkout app could help mitigate these impacts by allowing patrons to check out items on their own, freeing up staff to focus on other tasks and improving wait times. These options may help address the challenges of reduced staffing while still providing important reference assistance to patrons.
The document discusses introducing self-service options at the Oakland Public Library to address decreases in library funding and staffing. It notes that between 2008-2013, US public library funding decreased by an average of 5.3% annually, resulting in staff reductions at the Oakland library. While reference needs remain high, there are now fewer staff to assist patrons. The document recommends adopting RFID self-checkout technology and a mobile app to ease the impact of staff reductions, improve wait times, and streamline the checkout process. This will allow staff to focus on core tasks and enhance patron service despite budget and staffing constraints.
This presentation reviewed user-driven acquisitions in general and how the collection development practices and policies at Texas A&M University have shifted to address them.
The document discusses the Steacie Science Library's New Books Blog at York University Libraries. It provides details on how the blog is used to promote new titles to the academic community, how librarians select and post books of interest, and how the blog is promoted through various channels including the library website, research guides, and social media. Usage statistics show the blog receives clicks from these promotional channels and that users view a variety of book and DVD titles.
Databases are collections of materials from magazines, academic journals, books, and reference works that have been made accessible online. Any Queens Library member with a library card and PIN number can access these databases 24 hours a day, 7 days a week from the Queens Library website. These databases provide access to articles, book entries, and other resources written by scholars and authors that students can cite directly in their research papers rather than citing websites. The databases cover topics such as opposing viewpoints on issues, literature, biographies, and general reference materials for students.
Discover the Power Inside Web of ScienceMaira Bundza
The document summarizes research conducted to analyze Eastern Michigan University faculty publications and citations between 2005-2007. Researchers retrieved article and citation data for EMU authors from the Web of Science database. They surveyed EMU faculty authors and interviewed a sample. The analysis found that 121 EMU faculty published 244 articles in 209 unique journals, 87.56% of which the university library owned. The most frequently cited journals were also identified. Faculty responses indicated the library resources were generally adequate but could be improved with additional online journals and resources.
This document summarizes different types of open access publishing models and provides information about publishing open access journals at the University of Western Sydney (UWS). It discusses gold, green, and hybrid open access models. It also provides details on funds available at UWS to cover article processing fees for open access publication, how to search for open access journals, and UWS's own open access journals.
Nancy Jeu from the Friends of the Oakland Public Library presented on bringing self-service options to the Oakland Public Library. Due to decreased funding, the library has faced staff reductions which has negatively impacted services. Self-service technologies like RFID and a mobile checkout app could help mitigate these impacts by allowing patrons to check out items on their own, freeing up staff to focus on other tasks and improving wait times. These options may help address the challenges of reduced staffing while still providing important reference assistance to patrons.
The document discusses introducing self-service options at the Oakland Public Library to address decreases in library funding and staffing. It notes that between 2008-2013, US public library funding decreased by an average of 5.3% annually, resulting in staff reductions at the Oakland library. While reference needs remain high, there are now fewer staff to assist patrons. The document recommends adopting RFID self-checkout technology and a mobile app to ease the impact of staff reductions, improve wait times, and streamline the checkout process. This will allow staff to focus on core tasks and enhance patron service despite budget and staffing constraints.
This presentation reviewed user-driven acquisitions in general and how the collection development practices and policies at Texas A&M University have shifted to address them.
The document discusses the Steacie Science Library's New Books Blog at York University Libraries. It provides details on how the blog is used to promote new titles to the academic community, how librarians select and post books of interest, and how the blog is promoted through various channels including the library website, research guides, and social media. Usage statistics show the blog receives clicks from these promotional channels and that users view a variety of book and DVD titles.
Open Access: Blazing Trails through the Scholarly Communication LandscapeMolly Keener
Slides from a presentation given before faculty at Furman University in Greenville, SC, as part of the Libraries' "Scholarly Conversations" series, and in celebration of Open Access Week 2012.
The document discusses open access (OA) in scholarly publishing. It notes the current publishing crisis where publishers get free content from publicly funded research while restricting access. OA aims to make research freely and permanently available online. There are two main routes to OA - green OA using institutional repositories, and gold OA through OA journals. ECU supports green OA through its Research Online repository. New requirements from the NHMRC will mandate depositing publications in OA repositories within 12 months. The document provides an overview of key issues around OA including copyright and benefits for authors, libraries and scholars.
This document provides an introduction to open access publishing. It discusses the two main types of open access, gold and green, and notes the rapid growth of open access journals and repositories in recent years. Funding mandates from agencies like Canada's Tri-Agencies are also driving more research to be made openly accessible. The document seeks to dispel common myths about open access and provides resources for supporting open access publishing at the author's institution.
Scholarly communication refers to how academics find information, create knowledge, and share it with students and beyond academia. Traditionally, scholars would meet and correspond privately, but scholarly journals emerged as correspondence increased. Problems with the current system include commercial publishers controlling access and pricing out readers. Open Access aims to make scholarly works free online, either by publishing in an Open Access journal or self-archiving in an institutional repository. There are advocacy policies and mandates growing for Open Access worldwide to benefit research dissemination and public access to taxpayer-funded work.
El acceso abierto y las revistas depredadoras: un paso adelante y dos pasos h...Journals Authors
Jeffrey Beall, retirado de la University of Colorado, Denver, Estados Unidos. Conferencia presentada en el 4.° Encuentro Regional de Editores de Revistas Académicas 2019. Journals & Authors, Medellín - Colombia.
Open Access: Putting the Public Back in PublicationJill Cirasella
This document discusses open access (OA) scholarly publishing. It defines OA as works that are accessible online at no cost and available for all to read and use, with proper attribution. The traditional subscription-based scholarly publishing system is described as outdated, expensive, and suboptimal. OA benefits readers, authors, libraries, and society by making research more accessible and connecting the public to publications. While some criticize OA as being unreviewed or predatory, the document argues that OA journals can be high-quality and that both OA and traditional journals vary in quality. It encourages authors to consider OA options and understand their rights to self-archive their work.
This document discusses access to scientific information in the past, present, and future. It describes how the traditional publishing model worked for 60 years but is now broken due to rising costs. Maintaining a 4% annual growth rate of scientific research is crucial for economic and social progress but is at risk if access to information is limited. New models of open access aim to make scientific articles freely available online through digital repositories and funding consortiums. While opening access provides benefits like increased citations and readership, the immediate costs of lost opportunities for discovery if nothing changes are a serious concern.
Open Access Mash-Up: Protecting Your Rights As an Author + Putting the Public...Jill Cirasella
This slideshow is a mash-up of http://www.slideshare.net/cirasella/you-know-what-you-write-but-do-you-know-your-rights and http://www.slideshare.net/cirasella/open-access-putting-the-public-back-in-publication
Presentation on scope, successes and challenges facing library Open Access publishing funds for the Canadian Association of Learned Journals meeting at Congress 2014. Focus on Canada but also some info on the U.S.
Jay patel Open Access TIPPA Midwest presentation june 2013Jay Patel
From closed to Open Access
This document summarizes how open access publishing is changing the way research is disseminated. It provides a brief history of scholarly publishing, outlines the benefits and limitations of traditional closed access models, and defines open access. Open access provides free online access to peer-reviewed research and is growing due to funder and institutional mandates. While it increases access and sharing, open access faces challenges around quality control and funding publication fees. The future may see greater open access support and alternative models like preprint servers and fluid embedded papers.
Open access (OA) to scholarly literature recently hit a major milestone: Half of all research articles published become open access, either immediately or after an embargo period. Are the articles you read among them? What about the articles you write? Are the journals to which you submit open-access friendly? What about the journals for which you peer review? Are there any reasons why the public should not have access to the results of taxpayer-funded research?
In this slideshow, Jill Cirasella (Associate Librarian for Public Services and Scholarly Communication, Graduate Center, CUNY) explains the motivation for OA, describes the details of OA, and differentiates between publishing in open access journals (“gold” OA) and self-archiving works in OA repositories (“green” OA). She also dispels persistent myths about OA and examines some of the challenges to OA.
This document discusses open access publishing challenges and successes. It covers several topics:
1) Commercial publishers dominate the market and operate under a profitable subscription model that some argue is a "triple-pay system."
2) Open access models include article processing charges (APCs) that some argue disadvantage certain authors and institutions.
3) Predatory journals and conferences exploit authors but are difficult to definitively identify.
4) "Black" open access options like Sci-Hub provide free access to research but raise legal issues regarding copyright and piracy.
Overall the document examines the tensions between for-profit and non-profit publishing models in serving the goal of making research outputs widely available.
This document discusses open access in scholarly publishing. It notes that while researchers do much of the work in publishing (e.g. peer review), large publishers then take control of the copyright and charge high fees to access the work. This limits accessibility and costs libraries large sums. Open access aims to make research freely available online without paywalls or strict copyright limits on use. However, scholars face pressure to publish in high prestige journals, even if they are not open access. Metrics like impact factor are flawed but still influence careers. The document argues for open access on ethical grounds to make knowledge widely available, and notes it does not necessarily mean lower quality.
Predatory publishing: pitfalls for the unwary. 25 Oct 2013Simon Huggard
Presentation given at the Library Research Forum, La Trobe University, 25 October 2013. Discusses issues with predatory publishers and what to check. Discusses open access publishing in an institutional digital repository
An Open Access Solution that is Genuinely and Globally OpenTown Peterson
This document discusses open access to scholarly literature. It defines open access as digital content that is free of charge and most copyright/licensing restrictions. While open access literature is not free to produce, the goal is to make it costless to access. The document outlines various open access models including green (self-archiving), gold (fully open access journals), hybrid (option to pay a fee to make individual articles open), and platinum (no fees for readers or authors, requiring subsidy). It argues that open access is necessary to foster a global scholarly community but that not all solutions are equal, and that platinum open access which removes all barriers ultimately requires sustainable subsidy.
Selecting open access Knowledge Base collections for Discovery Jeff Siemon
Open Access KB (Knowledge Base) collections can add diversity and breadth to your library’s Discovery experience of e-journals and eBooks. What kinds of OA (open access) collections are available in the OCLC KB? What levels of quality are represented? Which OA collections should my library select? How do you search for and select OA collections? How can you elevate, in Discovery results lists, results from purchased collections before results from OA collections, if you want to? This will be a presentation, with flexibility for questions and sharing experiences.
Of CUNY, By CUNY, For CUNY: How We All Benefit from Open Access and Why We Al...Jill Cirasella
Open access (OA) can benefit everyone at CUNY. OA refers to scholarly works that are accessible online at no cost. While publishing is now easy and inexpensive, journal prices remain high. The traditional system is outdated and exploitative. CUNY needs an institutional repository to make OA easier by allowing faculty to archive their works and increase their impact. An IR would provide access to more literature for students and save money for libraries no longer constrained by journal prices.
This document provides an overview of open access publishing by discussing its history, key concepts, movements, challenges, and progress. It notes that open access aims to make peer-reviewed research available freely online by combining scientists' traditional willingness to publish without payment with new internet technologies. Major developments discussed include the creation of the World Wide Web, Creative Commons licensing, and the growth of open access mandates and repositories worldwide.
Nicole Nogoy at the G3 Workshop: Open Access Publishing - What you need to KnowGigaScience, BGI Hong Kong
This document discusses open access publishing and some of the key challenges. It notes that while open access publishing removes barriers to accessing and sharing scientific research, major publishers currently control the market and charge high subscription fees. This puts strain on library budgets. The document outlines initiatives to increase open access, such as university and funder mandates, and notes that open access journals can have high impact. However, challenges remain around copyright and the ability to fully text mine and reuse content. More advocacy and support for open access is needed to address these issues.
This document discusses predatory publishing and provides tips to avoid it. It defines predatory publishers as dishonest publishers that exploit the open-access model by publishing counterfeit journals to dupe researchers into paying publication fees. It recommends researchers check tools like Beall's list or ask librarians to verify journals, look at impact factors and editorial boards, and avoid unsolicited publication requests. The document warns that predatory publishers can devalue researchers' publishing records and restrict future publishing.
This document discusses several topics related to digitizing collections for access and preservation in the digital humanities field. It begins by using the metaphor of a digital dance to represent research infrastructure and the many existing collections. It then discusses principles for making digitized data open, interoperable, citable, and preserved for long-term access. The document also examines drivers for digitizing collections such as utilitarianism, preservation, opportunism, and consumerism. Finally, it raises questions about how digitized collections could be viewed and transformed as datasets and corpora of knowledge in the future.
More Related Content
Similar to Elephants and copyright – considerations for a different future
Open Access: Blazing Trails through the Scholarly Communication LandscapeMolly Keener
Slides from a presentation given before faculty at Furman University in Greenville, SC, as part of the Libraries' "Scholarly Conversations" series, and in celebration of Open Access Week 2012.
The document discusses open access (OA) in scholarly publishing. It notes the current publishing crisis where publishers get free content from publicly funded research while restricting access. OA aims to make research freely and permanently available online. There are two main routes to OA - green OA using institutional repositories, and gold OA through OA journals. ECU supports green OA through its Research Online repository. New requirements from the NHMRC will mandate depositing publications in OA repositories within 12 months. The document provides an overview of key issues around OA including copyright and benefits for authors, libraries and scholars.
This document provides an introduction to open access publishing. It discusses the two main types of open access, gold and green, and notes the rapid growth of open access journals and repositories in recent years. Funding mandates from agencies like Canada's Tri-Agencies are also driving more research to be made openly accessible. The document seeks to dispel common myths about open access and provides resources for supporting open access publishing at the author's institution.
Scholarly communication refers to how academics find information, create knowledge, and share it with students and beyond academia. Traditionally, scholars would meet and correspond privately, but scholarly journals emerged as correspondence increased. Problems with the current system include commercial publishers controlling access and pricing out readers. Open Access aims to make scholarly works free online, either by publishing in an Open Access journal or self-archiving in an institutional repository. There are advocacy policies and mandates growing for Open Access worldwide to benefit research dissemination and public access to taxpayer-funded work.
El acceso abierto y las revistas depredadoras: un paso adelante y dos pasos h...Journals Authors
Jeffrey Beall, retirado de la University of Colorado, Denver, Estados Unidos. Conferencia presentada en el 4.° Encuentro Regional de Editores de Revistas Académicas 2019. Journals & Authors, Medellín - Colombia.
Open Access: Putting the Public Back in PublicationJill Cirasella
This document discusses open access (OA) scholarly publishing. It defines OA as works that are accessible online at no cost and available for all to read and use, with proper attribution. The traditional subscription-based scholarly publishing system is described as outdated, expensive, and suboptimal. OA benefits readers, authors, libraries, and society by making research more accessible and connecting the public to publications. While some criticize OA as being unreviewed or predatory, the document argues that OA journals can be high-quality and that both OA and traditional journals vary in quality. It encourages authors to consider OA options and understand their rights to self-archive their work.
This document discusses access to scientific information in the past, present, and future. It describes how the traditional publishing model worked for 60 years but is now broken due to rising costs. Maintaining a 4% annual growth rate of scientific research is crucial for economic and social progress but is at risk if access to information is limited. New models of open access aim to make scientific articles freely available online through digital repositories and funding consortiums. While opening access provides benefits like increased citations and readership, the immediate costs of lost opportunities for discovery if nothing changes are a serious concern.
Open Access Mash-Up: Protecting Your Rights As an Author + Putting the Public...Jill Cirasella
This slideshow is a mash-up of http://www.slideshare.net/cirasella/you-know-what-you-write-but-do-you-know-your-rights and http://www.slideshare.net/cirasella/open-access-putting-the-public-back-in-publication
Presentation on scope, successes and challenges facing library Open Access publishing funds for the Canadian Association of Learned Journals meeting at Congress 2014. Focus on Canada but also some info on the U.S.
Jay patel Open Access TIPPA Midwest presentation june 2013Jay Patel
From closed to Open Access
This document summarizes how open access publishing is changing the way research is disseminated. It provides a brief history of scholarly publishing, outlines the benefits and limitations of traditional closed access models, and defines open access. Open access provides free online access to peer-reviewed research and is growing due to funder and institutional mandates. While it increases access and sharing, open access faces challenges around quality control and funding publication fees. The future may see greater open access support and alternative models like preprint servers and fluid embedded papers.
Open access (OA) to scholarly literature recently hit a major milestone: Half of all research articles published become open access, either immediately or after an embargo period. Are the articles you read among them? What about the articles you write? Are the journals to which you submit open-access friendly? What about the journals for which you peer review? Are there any reasons why the public should not have access to the results of taxpayer-funded research?
In this slideshow, Jill Cirasella (Associate Librarian for Public Services and Scholarly Communication, Graduate Center, CUNY) explains the motivation for OA, describes the details of OA, and differentiates between publishing in open access journals (“gold” OA) and self-archiving works in OA repositories (“green” OA). She also dispels persistent myths about OA and examines some of the challenges to OA.
This document discusses open access publishing challenges and successes. It covers several topics:
1) Commercial publishers dominate the market and operate under a profitable subscription model that some argue is a "triple-pay system."
2) Open access models include article processing charges (APCs) that some argue disadvantage certain authors and institutions.
3) Predatory journals and conferences exploit authors but are difficult to definitively identify.
4) "Black" open access options like Sci-Hub provide free access to research but raise legal issues regarding copyright and piracy.
Overall the document examines the tensions between for-profit and non-profit publishing models in serving the goal of making research outputs widely available.
This document discusses open access in scholarly publishing. It notes that while researchers do much of the work in publishing (e.g. peer review), large publishers then take control of the copyright and charge high fees to access the work. This limits accessibility and costs libraries large sums. Open access aims to make research freely available online without paywalls or strict copyright limits on use. However, scholars face pressure to publish in high prestige journals, even if they are not open access. Metrics like impact factor are flawed but still influence careers. The document argues for open access on ethical grounds to make knowledge widely available, and notes it does not necessarily mean lower quality.
Predatory publishing: pitfalls for the unwary. 25 Oct 2013Simon Huggard
Presentation given at the Library Research Forum, La Trobe University, 25 October 2013. Discusses issues with predatory publishers and what to check. Discusses open access publishing in an institutional digital repository
An Open Access Solution that is Genuinely and Globally OpenTown Peterson
This document discusses open access to scholarly literature. It defines open access as digital content that is free of charge and most copyright/licensing restrictions. While open access literature is not free to produce, the goal is to make it costless to access. The document outlines various open access models including green (self-archiving), gold (fully open access journals), hybrid (option to pay a fee to make individual articles open), and platinum (no fees for readers or authors, requiring subsidy). It argues that open access is necessary to foster a global scholarly community but that not all solutions are equal, and that platinum open access which removes all barriers ultimately requires sustainable subsidy.
Selecting open access Knowledge Base collections for Discovery Jeff Siemon
Open Access KB (Knowledge Base) collections can add diversity and breadth to your library’s Discovery experience of e-journals and eBooks. What kinds of OA (open access) collections are available in the OCLC KB? What levels of quality are represented? Which OA collections should my library select? How do you search for and select OA collections? How can you elevate, in Discovery results lists, results from purchased collections before results from OA collections, if you want to? This will be a presentation, with flexibility for questions and sharing experiences.
Of CUNY, By CUNY, For CUNY: How We All Benefit from Open Access and Why We Al...Jill Cirasella
Open access (OA) can benefit everyone at CUNY. OA refers to scholarly works that are accessible online at no cost. While publishing is now easy and inexpensive, journal prices remain high. The traditional system is outdated and exploitative. CUNY needs an institutional repository to make OA easier by allowing faculty to archive their works and increase their impact. An IR would provide access to more literature for students and save money for libraries no longer constrained by journal prices.
This document provides an overview of open access publishing by discussing its history, key concepts, movements, challenges, and progress. It notes that open access aims to make peer-reviewed research available freely online by combining scientists' traditional willingness to publish without payment with new internet technologies. Major developments discussed include the creation of the World Wide Web, Creative Commons licensing, and the growth of open access mandates and repositories worldwide.
Nicole Nogoy at the G3 Workshop: Open Access Publishing - What you need to KnowGigaScience, BGI Hong Kong
This document discusses open access publishing and some of the key challenges. It notes that while open access publishing removes barriers to accessing and sharing scientific research, major publishers currently control the market and charge high subscription fees. This puts strain on library budgets. The document outlines initiatives to increase open access, such as university and funder mandates, and notes that open access journals can have high impact. However, challenges remain around copyright and the ability to fully text mine and reuse content. More advocacy and support for open access is needed to address these issues.
Similar to Elephants and copyright – considerations for a different future (20)
This document discusses predatory publishing and provides tips to avoid it. It defines predatory publishers as dishonest publishers that exploit the open-access model by publishing counterfeit journals to dupe researchers into paying publication fees. It recommends researchers check tools like Beall's list or ask librarians to verify journals, look at impact factors and editorial boards, and avoid unsolicited publication requests. The document warns that predatory publishers can devalue researchers' publishing records and restrict future publishing.
This document discusses several topics related to digitizing collections for access and preservation in the digital humanities field. It begins by using the metaphor of a digital dance to represent research infrastructure and the many existing collections. It then discusses principles for making digitized data open, interoperable, citable, and preserved for long-term access. The document also examines drivers for digitizing collections such as utilitarianism, preservation, opportunism, and consumerism. Finally, it raises questions about how digitized collections could be viewed and transformed as datasets and corpora of knowledge in the future.
Open etext books are making a significant difference to educational outcomes. Includes a case study of The plan detectives and analysis of the changes made to student outcomes.
The document discusses the evolution of textbooks from printed to online formats. It notes that textbooks are moving from being authored by single academics to co-created works involving students. Textbooks are also becoming integrated into online courses and MOOCs. Some of the challenges mentioned include determining what academics want to deliver through textbooks and whether content should be open access. The document then discusses an evidence-based plant science course that uses online textbooks and collaborative group work. Student feedback indicated high satisfaction with clear expectations, learning activities, and assessment. Usage statistics showed 113 online views of the textbook from January to June 2016. The document concludes by discussing the potential impact of open textbooks on student outcomes and the future "MOOCification" of textbooks through added inter
Managing key relationships: the Library and the academic worldRoxanne Missingham
The document discusses the role of university libraries in supporting academic research and knowledge sharing. It notes that libraries are well-positioned as "intermediaries" that can help disseminate research outputs more widely. The document also summarizes a study which found that industry stakeholders have an unmet need for easier access and validation of research data. It concludes that libraries are uniquely placed to help address current gaps like improving the discoverability, contextualization, and impact tracking of university research.
Collections and budgets: libraries and publishers and collaborationRoxanne Missingham
This document discusses several studies on the roles and perceptions of academic libraries. Some key findings from the studies include:
- Academics value libraries' role in purchasing resources and see this as very important, especially for humanists.
- Few academics think students have strong research skills, but there is little agreement on whose role it is to develop these skills.
- Academics prefer using their library's website, databases, or public search engines over visiting the physical library building.
- Academics select journals to publish in based on characteristics like coverage, readership, and impact factor. Disciplines vary in embracing digital research methods.
Presentation to CAUL Research repositories Community event 2015Roxanne Missingham
Business and industry groups need for an use of information.
http://www.caul.edu.au/about-caul/caul-meetings/research-meetings/repository-meetings/repositories2015event/repositories2015event-program
Come to the library to learn how not to smile at a crocodileRoxanne Missingham
The document discusses the Personal Library program at the ANU Library aimed at helping postgraduate students develop digital skills for researching. It provides statistics on program participation and feedback. Key aspects of the program include building relationships with students, focusing on their needs as researchers, and collaborating with other institutions. The library also discusses expanding 24/7 access and developing research skills in areas like data management, scholarly publishing, and soft skills.
National Scholarly Communications Forum 2015 monographsRoxanne Missingham
The document discusses issues related to monographs and university presses. It notes declining book circulation at university libraries and that university press titles account for a significant percentage of circulations. However, the percentage of university press titles circulating is falling. It also discusses debates around digital natives and differences in electronic versus print use. The document examines case studies of specific monograph titles and references guides on open access monograph publishing.
This document discusses predatory publishing, which involves dishonest publishers exploiting the open-access model by publishing counterfeit journals to dupe researchers into paying publication fees without providing expected services like peer review or visibility. It provides tips to help researchers identify predatory publishers, such as checking tools like Beall's list or asking colleagues about journal quality and impact. Various types of deceptive publishing practices are described, and criteria for evaluating publishers' legitimacy are outlined.
This document discusses various models for publishing open access monographs. It outlines crowd-sourced models where the community helps fund projects, models where universities or research grants fund open access publications, and models where libraries pay publication fees. It also discusses using out-of-copyright works or fair use exceptions to digitize and publish older works openly. Different models can increase community engagement, tap new funding sources, or make work openly accessible depending on the funding source and copyright status.
The document discusses the Inter-State Commission which existed in Australia from 1912-1950 and again from 1983-1989 to provide advice on issues between states. It also discusses an inquiry into the efficiency dividend which found that smaller agencies have poorer economies of scale, less discretion over operations, and fewer opportunities to propose new policies to increase funding. The document provides links to various images and articles on topics like knowing your environment, returning on investment, and librarian confessions.
The document discusses how ANU Library is responding to changing needs through initiatives like MOOCs, improving search and finding resources, and supporting open access. It covers topics like theories of cognition and literacy, analyzing usage of the library catalogue and e-resources, and redesigning services to incorporate research on cognition and learning. The library aims to continue adapting to new developments in education through collaboration and exploring initiatives such as digitization and scholarly publishing.
RAILS Paper: Understanding information needs to support Australia’s policy of...Roxanne Missingham
This document discusses understanding information needs to support Australia's policy of engagement with Asia. It covers several topics:
- The importance of developing knowledge and deep understanding of Asia to strengthen relationships and people-to-people ties in the region.
- Different perspectives on knowledge transfer and management from industry, researchers, and universities/libraries, including challenges around acceptance of outreach as scholarship.
- Methodologies used in existing research on knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry, including focus groups and case studies.
- The disconnect that can sometimes exist between knowledge producers in universities and knowledge users in other sectors.
Presentation to Libraries, MOOCs and online learning ALIA,CAUL, OCLC and State Library of Queensland Symposium. https://www.alia.org.au/events/2348/libraries-moocs-and-online-learning
Higher education and copyright: fair use vital for the Australian policy agenda
This document discusses several key issues in higher education relating to copyright including the needs of 21st century academics, massive open online courses (MOOCs), digital humanities and data recreation. It notes that copyright law has not kept pace with changes in how research and teaching is conducted. It highlights challenges for open educational resources around discoverability, quality control, distribution and acquisition. The document advocates for open access policies and reforming copyright legislation to better support open sharing of knowledge and data in higher education.
This document discusses issues related to the changing roles of librarians and library technicians in light of technological changes. It provides tips for "guerrilla librarianship" such as going where users are instead of expecting them to come to the library, rethinking space and costs by focusing on digital collections and services, and taking services out into the community in new ways. The document suggests librarians will need to adapt to remain relevant as the field undergoes significant changes.
Presentation to Northern Sydney District Teacher Librarian Association Roxanne Missingham
This document discusses the changing role of libraries and information in the digital age. It notes that libraries now provide access to both print and digital information and must help users develop digital literacy skills. There is debate around whether digital formats can fully replace print and the role of libraries in providing long-term access to reliable information. New technologies like mobile devices and open data present opportunities but also challenges around issues like copyright and the risk of information being lost. The future of libraries may involve roles in areas like data management and supporting rights in the evolving information environment.
Collaborative resource discovery: researchers needs for navigation in a sea o...Roxanne Missingham
This document discusses challenges and opportunities related to navigating the growing sea of online information for researchers. It touches on topics like the changing scholarly environment, the role of libraries in collaboration, issues around access to information, debates on publishing and reading in digital formats, and the potential for new discovery tools and models through greater collaboration.
This document discusses open government and challenges around access to government information in Australia. It notes a 50% reduction in recorded government publications over the past decade due to devolved responsibilities and a shift to online publishing. While more information is available online, issues include lack of long-term access as websites and documents change or disappear. The document calls for a comprehensive national policy and infrastructure to support permanent public access to government information and ensure transparency.
Indonesian Manpower Regulation on Severance Pay for Retiring Private Sector E...AHRP Law Firm
Law Number 13 of 2003 on Manpower has been partially revoked and amended several times, with the latest amendment made through Law Number 6 of 2023. Attention is drawn to a specific part of the Manpower Law concerning severance pay. This aspect is undoubtedly one of the most crucial parts regulated by the Manpower Law. It is essential for both employers and employees to abide by the law, fulfill their obligations, and retain their rights regarding this matter.
A Critical Study of ICC Prosecutor's Move on GAZA WarNilendra Kumar
ICC Prosecutor Karim Khan's proposal to its judges seeking permission to prosecute Israeli leaders and Hamas commanders for crimes against the law of war has serious ramifications and calls deep scrutiny.
Safeguarding Against Financial Crime: AML Compliance Regulations DemystifiedPROF. PAUL ALLIEU KAMARA
To ensure the integrity of financial systems and combat illicit financial activities, understanding AML (Anti-Money Laundering) compliance regulations is crucial for financial institutions and businesses. AML compliance regulations are designed to prevent money laundering and the financing of terrorist activities by imposing specific requirements on financial institutions, including customer due diligence, monitoring, and reporting of suspicious activities (GitHub Docs).
Safeguarding Against Financial Crime: AML Compliance Regulations Demystified
Elephants and copyright – considerations for a different future
1. Elephants and copyright –
considerations for a different future
Roxanne Missingham
University Librarian
2. 2
Blind monks examining an elephant, an ukiyo-e print by Hanabusa Itchō (1652–1724)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blind_men_and_an_elephant#/media/File:Blind_monks_examining_an_elephant.jpg
3. Digital and open access disruption
Funders Authors
Publishers Readers/
users
Potenetial
users
AKA the Paywall
4. What do authors want….
The Post-Embargo Open Access Citation Advantage:
It Exists (Probably), It’s Modest (Usually), and the
Rich Get Richer (of Course)
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjou
•open access citation advantage as high as 19%
Research impact of paywalled versus open access
papers http://www.1science.com/oanumbr.html
•On average, open access papers produce a 50% higher
research impact than strictly paywalled papers. (study of
3.3. million papers)
5. Students progressing to
honours
5
The plant detectives: innovative undergraduate teaching to inspire the next generation of plant biologists
Elizabeth A. Beckmann1
, Gonzalo M. Estavillo2
, Ulrike Mathesius3
, Michael A. Djordjevic3
and Adrienne B. Nicotra3*
http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2015.00729/full
6. Money, money, money
• Much is discussed about payments by
authors, but what does the academic
author really pay or receive?
• ANU study 99 academic authors 2016
6
11. A typical scholarly author
• Is an author of 2-5 articles a year
• Authors of book chapters and books also
author journal articles
• What do they pay?
– less than $2,500 for publishing (copy editing,
image fees, index, design) – more for books
than journal articles
11
12. Main payments to authors
– Royalties/advances
• 20.2% of book authors (~72% under $1,000)
– ELR/PLR payments:
• 94.3% receive $0, 3.4% between $1 and $1,000,
• 98.9% of journal articles and other publications
receive $0
– Collecting societies payments
• 95.4% of book authors receive $0, 1.1% between
$1 and $1,000
• 97.7% of journal authors receive $0, 2.3% between
$1 and $1,000
12
13. A typical scholarly author
– Collecting societies payments
• 95.4% of book authors receive $0, 1.1% between
$1 and $1,000
• 97.7% of journal authors receive $0, 2.3% between
$1 and $1,000
• 96.7% of other publication authors receive $0,
3.4% between $1 and $1,000
13
14. What might change?
• Could we revolutionise citation?
Open access knowledge: digital style guide
• Are payments on the cusp of major
change? Germany vs Elsevier: universities
win temporary journal access after
refusing to pay fees
• Megajournals – making copyright
redundant? Future of the OA Megajournal
14
15. What does this mean for copyright
legislation?
• Flexibility for educational context is critical
• Legislation needs to ensure rights of
authors are retained, effectively support a
scholarly communications licence
• Legislation would then support the
National innovation & science agenda
15
16. Future
16
llustrator unknown - From Charles Maurice Stebbins & Mary H. Coolidge, Golden Treasury Readers:
Primer, American Book Co. (New York), p. 89.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blind_men_and_an_elephant#/media/File:Blind_men_and_elephant3.jpg