The document analyzes the effectiveness of training and development programs at Vivantha hotel in Kumarakom. It surveyed 30 employees using questionnaires and interviews. Statistical analysis found employees had a good opinion of comprehensive learning from training but average satisfaction with training. Employees' performance after training was also average. The document suggests continuing comprehensive learning and improving training to increase satisfaction and performance. Limitations included restrictions from the organization and a small sample size.

1. Effectiveness of training and
development
at
VIVANTHA By Taj
Kumarakom
Presented by,
Rateesh R

2.  Training and development is a planned effort to improve the
performance efficiency and effectiveness of members of
organization.
 The performance improvement may be effected by planned
learning and transfer of such learnt knowledge, skills and
attitude to work.
Introduction

3. 1. To study the needs of training
2. To find out the satisfaction of trainees
3. To find out the employee performance after the training at the
work.
Objectives

4.  Sample size
The sample size in the survey was 30.
 Tools used for data collection
 Questionnaire method
 interview schedule
 Statistical tool used for analysis
1. One sample t-test
2. Independent sample t-test
 Sampling technique
Simple random technique
Research methodology

5.  H0: The opinion of trainees as regards to the training provided is equal
to average.
 H0: The opinion of employees as regards to satisfaction level to the
training provided is equal to average.
 H0: There is no significant difference in opinion between males and
female as regards to training.
 H0: The opinion of employees performance after training is equal to
average.
Hypothesis

6. Data analysis
and
Interpretation

7. Valid Frequency Percent
less than
30
16 53.3
30-40 8 26.7
40-50 4 13.3
above 50 2 6.7
Total 30 100.0
AGE LEVEL
• From the pie-chart it is clear
that about 53.3% of the
respondents are under the
age of 30

8. Gender Frequency percent
MALE 23 76.7
FEMALE 7 23.3
Total 30 100.0
gender
The bar chart shows that,
• 76.7% of the employees are males
• 23.3% of the respondents are females

9.  H0: The opinion of trainees as regards to the training
provide is equal to average.
Mean T-
value
P-
value
Comprehensive
learning in the
organization
3.40 2.350 .026
clear understanding
about the norms and
values of org
3.03 .166 .869
familiarising of sinior
managrement
3.03 .166 .869
development of
human relation and
competencies
3.03 .154 .879
• Since the P-Value is more than (0.05) in
three cases, the null hypothesis is accepted
• For comprehensive learning in the
organization the p-value is less than (0.05)
so null hypotheses is rejected.
• Since the null hypotheses is rejected we go
for the mean value of Comprehensive
learning in the organization
• Mean value is above the preset value (3)
Ha: opinion of employees as regards to
comprehensive learning in the organization is
good
Test Value = 3

10.  H0: The opinion of employees as regards to satisfaction
level to the training provided is equal to average.
Mean T P
Induction training is well planned 2.63 -2.009 .060
planning of the induction training 2.90 -.432 .669
planning of the induction duration 2.93 -.278 .783
org policy 3.23 1.270 .214
training given important skills and
knowledge 3.20 .947 .351
• Since the P-Value in all cases is more than (0.05) null
hypotheses is accepted.
Test Value = 3

11.  H0: There is no significant difference in opinion of
male and female satisfaction regard training.
• Since the P-Value in all cases is more than (0.05) null hypotheses is
accepted.
Gender mean F p
Induction training is well planned Male
Female
2.65
2.57 .046 .831
planning of the induction training
Male
Female
2.83
3.14
.001
.973
planning of the induction duration
Male
Female
2.78
3.43 .451
.507
org policy
Male
Female
3.00
3.14
8.935
.884
training given important skills and
knowledge
Male
Female 3.13
3.57 .015 .904

12.  H0: The opinion of employees performance after
training is equal to average.
Mean T P
Work improvement 2.83 -.796 .433
Increase in confident level 3.33 1.720 .096
Speedily disposal of the work 3.17 1.000 .326
Imp level of understanding about very
familiar of the com.
3.27 1.137 .265
• Since the P-Value in all cases is more than (0.05) null
hypotheses is accepted.
Test Value = 3

13.  The opinion of employees as regards to the
comprehensive learning in the organization is
good
 The satisfaction level of trainees as regards to
the training providing is average.
 The employees performance after training is
average.
Findings

14.  Since the employees have good opinion about
the comprehensive learning , let the trend
continue
 As the employees have a average opinion
about the training provided , it is better to
improve the training offered to the
employees
Suggestions

15.  Restrictions imposed by the organization
 Sample size was comparatively small
Limitation