Eduu551 powerpoint1
•Download as PPT, PDF•
2 likes•558 views
This document is a 10th grade language arts lesson plan about The Crucible and the Salem Witch Trials. It instructs students to write a letter to Governor Phips either praising or criticizing the Salem Witch Trials. Students are provided links to learn about Thomas Brattle, who wrote a famous letter criticizing the trials, as well as Increase Mather and explanations for the girls' behavior. The lesson aims to teach students persuasive writing and understanding how word choices can influence readers.
Report
Share
Report
Share
![Now that we’ve read, The Crucible , use your journal to ask yourself: ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]]()
Recommended
Tips for EditorialsTips on Content of Letter· If a publicatio.docx
Tips for Editorials
Tips on Content of Letter:
· If a publication receives multiple letters on the same subject, the editor will choose one that says something in a new way or takes a unique angle.
· Focus your letter on one point on one subject. If you are commenting on a specific story in the paper, mention the headline and date. Cite the specific reference and sum it up in a sentence to refresh readers’ memories. Then point out facts that were left out, or refute or support facts that were stated.
· Be clear and concise. Shorter is better. Most papers want letters of 250 words or less. Magazines such as Time want even less.
· State your point early in the letter and support your point with facts.
· Know the audience of the publication. Technical information and long, multi-syllable words are often inappropriate for a general audience.
· If appropriate, mention your motivation or expertise in writing. For example, “As an Ohio State University student, I believe… and therefore x,” or “I am a director of a non-profit agency that serves families in poverty. Here is what my experience has been….That is why I believe y.”
General Logistical Tips:
Know and follow the policies and specifications of the publication to which you are submitting your letter. Except as noted, it is OK to send the same or similar letters to more than one publication. But don’t submit the same or similar letters to multiple papers in the same media market.
Always include your name, address, and daytime telephone number.
Don’t send specifically local letters to other localities.
General Tips:
Avoid clichés, name-calling, slang, and repetition.
Check your letter for grammar and fluidity, read it out loud to make sure the thoughts flow well.
Give it a catchy title.
How do you write a letter to the editor?
1. Begin the letter with a simple salutation.
Don’t worry if you don’t know the editor’s name. A simple, “To the Editor of the Lantern” is sufficient. If you have the editor’s name, however, you should use it to increase the possibility of your letter being read.
2. Grab the reader’s attention.
Get attention right away; your opening sentence is very important. It should make the reader want to read more.
3. Explain what the letter is about at the start.
Throughout your letter, remember the rule:
Be quick,
Be concise, and then
Be quiet.
Don’t make the editor or the general public wait to find out what you want to say. Tell them your key point at the beginning.
4. Explain why the issue is important.
If you are motivated enough to write a letter to a newspaper or magazine, the importance of your topic may seem clear to you. Remember, though, that the general public probably doesn’t share your background or the interest. Explain the issue and its importance simply. Use plain language that most people will understand.
5. Give evidence for any praise or criticism.
If you are writing a letter discussing a past or pending action, be clear in showing why ...
Alternative Dispute Resolution Essay.pdf
Alternative Dispute Resolution. Letter Essay Example | StudyHippo.com. Alternative Dispute Resolution Essay Example | Topics and Well Written .... (PDF) Approach to Alternative Dispute Resolution. Alternative Dispute Resolution - University Law - Marked by Teachers.com. Notes - Alternative Dispute Resolution - StuDocu. Dispute Resolution Essay | Legal Studies - Year 11 HSC | Thinkswap. 11+ Alternative Dispute Resolution Templates in PDF | DOC. Alternative Dispute Resolution Essay | LW462 - Alternative Dispute .... Alternative Dispute Resolution Case Study Example | Topics and Well .... Essay on Alternative Dispute Resolution | JUST5722 - Conflict .... Alternative Dispute Resolution Essays. Chapter Four | Alternative Dispute Resolution | Mediation. Alternative Dispute Resolution - Alternative Dispute Resolution .... Alternative dispute resolution essay - Alternative dispute resolution .... Alternative dispute resolution methods Essay Example | Topics and Well .... Alternative Dispute Resolution Essay Example | Sitedoct.org. Notes of Alternative Dispute Resolution - AJ 2017 Alternative Dispute .... (PDF) Mediation as alternative dispute resolution. Alternative Dispute Resolution Essay | LAW157 - Alternative Dispute .... Alternative Dispute Resolution Essay - A-Level Law - Marked by Teachers.com. Alternative Dispute Resolution Clause Essay Example | Topics and Well ....
Writing AssignmentWrite a four page double-spaced argument anal.docx
Writing Assignment:
Write a four page double-spaced argument analysis paper in which you analyze the two letters by the clergymen and King. Put the letters in historical context by describing the rhetorical situation, with emphasis on the exigence, the audiences, and constraints. Explain the issue from both points of view. Summarize the positions taken on the issue in both letters. Describe and evaluate the support, the warrants, and backing in both. Identify any fallacies and describe how the author’s use rebuttal. Finally, evaluate the ethical and unethical qualities that appear in the letters and write a conclusion in which you make a claim about the relative effectiveness of the two letters. Which letter is more effective? Why? Have you views been modified or changed? How?
Writing the Argument Analysis Paper
Create a structure for your essay:
For example make a list or an outline.
Place your ideas in an order that makes sense. Since you will be comparing and contrasting you may want to write first about the clergymen’s letter and then King’s letter and draw conclusions about both of them at the end.
Explain the rhetorical situation. Be sure to place the letters in historical context and describe the audience that both are addressing. Then explain the issue from both points of view and summarize the authors’ positions.
State the claims and describe the support in both letters.
Include summarized, paraphrased, or quoted material from the letters to provide evidence to support your main points. (use MLA format for citations)
Write a conclusion in which you evaluate the letters. Are they ethical or unethical? Is one more effective and convincing than the other? Why?
Focus Topics to Help You Analyze the Letters
Answer the questions that accompany the eight focus topics listed.
1. Rhetorical Situation: Consider each of these points.
0. What is the exigence for these two letters? What caused the authors to write them? What was the problem? Was it a new or recurring problem?
0. Who is the audience for the clergyman’s letter/ For King’s letter? What is the nature of these audiences? Can they be convinced? What are the expected outcomes?
0. What are the constraints? Speculate about the beliefs, attitudes, habits, and traditions that were in place that limited or constrained both the white clergyman and King. How did these constraining circumstances influence the audience for both letters at that time/
0. Think about the authors of both letters. Who are they/ speculate about their backgrounds, experience, affiliations, and values. What motivated them to write/
0. What kind of text is each letter? What effect do its special qualities and features have on an audience?
0. Think about yourself as a reader. What is your position on the issue/ do you experience constraints as read? Do you perceive common ground with either the clergyman or King, or both? Describe it. Are you influenced by these letters? How?
1. Organization and claims:
Divide each le.
Capstone Paper Introduction Students will select a s.docx
Capstone Paper
Introduction
Students will select a specific problem or policy discussed in the Alexander book and discuss the ramifications of the problem/policy within the criminal justice system. The paper should take the form of a problem/policy analysis and should indicate whether the problem is theoretical or practical (applied). Furthermore, students should include, at minimum, answers to the problem including, but not limited to, who, what, when, where, why, and how the problem originated within the criminal justice system as well as how it continues to be a problem.
1-2 pages
Literature Review
Students are expected to read and review historical and current research on their specific problem; this includes prior studies on the problem selected.
3-4 pages
Criminological Theory
Students should review criminological theory and ascertain how the problem/policy is rooted in a particular theory. Students should consult the text from Nature and Causes of Crime/Criminological Theory as a starting place.
1-2 pages
Cases
Students should review case law to determine the extent to which the problem/policy has been reviewed by the courts and provide a thorough background of the case(s) and the judicial opinion. If the problem/policy has not yet been reviewed by the courts, students should research case precedents that are closely aligned to the problem.
1-2 pages
Position
Students must clearly articulate their opinion on the problem/policy and how it should be addressed. A plan of action to support your position is expected.
1-2 pages
Alternative Positions
Provide a critique of logical alternatives to dealing with the problem.
1-2 pages
Critical Reflection
Using critical thinking and reflection skills, explain how the problem/policy, your position (and alternatives) affect police, courts, and corrections.
1-2 pages
Conclusion
Finally, provide a final description of the problem, theory, literature review, position and alternative positions.
1-2 pages
References
A detailed References section including a minimum of 15 resources is required. Resources may include professional trade journals, books, peer reviewed publications, and government publications. Wikipedia is not permitted. Internet resources will be limited to EBSCO, NCJRS, BJA, BJS, DOJ, OJJDP, and FirstGov. APA format must be used. Papers with incorrect APA format will be returned with no grade for revision.
His 330
Fall 2013
Writing Assignments—Tupelo
General Guidelines
Writing assignments should be doubled spaced and use a standard 12 point font. Remember to always put your name on your work.
Writing assignments should be submitted via SafeAssign on Blackboard before class on the date listed below. One letter grade will be deducted for each day the paper is late. Papers more than four days late will not be graded and given a zero. It is your responsibility to insure that papers are properly submitted to Blackboard on time. If in doubt, email a ...
Reading Scientific Articles - Agripharmatech - Library A
Paper Writing Service
http://HelpWriting.net/Reading-Scientific-Articles---Agripharm
eflection Paper Topics with Grading RubricYou will write a 1000-.docx
eflection Paper Topics with Grading Rubric
You will write a 1000-1500 word response to your chosen paper topic from the list below. See Course Outline for the due date.
This assignment is worth 300 points, or 30% of your grade.
DO NOT USE ANY SOURCES OTHER THAN THE DALRYMPLE ARTICLE AND YOUR TEXTBOOK.
YOU WILL ATTACH A FILE IN THE BOX AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE.
Learning Objectives:
Students will demonstrate their ability to construct arguments about issues of both personal and universal significance. Their writing should demonstrate that they can construct cogent, concise, and logically coherent arguments.
Assessment:
Students should demonstrate that they can distinguish the relevant points that form a logically coherent argument. They should also be able to construct criticisms which effectively undermine, through the use of appropriate counter-examples, some premise of that argument.
Your assignment is to read any ONE of the following four articles:
The Frivolity of Evil
How and How Not to Love Mankind
What We Have to Lose
Roads to Serfdom
Then, FOR THE ARTICLE YOU CHOOSE TO WRITE ON, you will type a 1000-1500 word response in which you address EACH of the following points IN YOUR OWN WORDS: 1) What is the author's main argument? 2) How does he support his main argument (evidence, ancillary arguments, etc.)? 3) Do you agree or disagree with him? 4) Why or why not? 5) Apply the insights of at least two of the readings we have studied in this course (in chapters 1-9) to your analysis. Make sure to give a substantive explanation of how the philosophers' insights are relevant to the topic you are discussing.
A WORD OF WARNING: These articles are rather long and complex. The author likes to make extensive use of his rather copious vocabulary, so I strongly urge you to have dictionary.com handy as you work your way through your chosen article. The purpose of this essay assignment is for you to demonstrate your ability to discuss, analyze, and evaluate complex philosophic arguments. I am confident that the reading assignments, tests, and discussion boards will have prepared you for this final, and no doubt challenging, essay assignment.
Note: I only allow one attempt on this assignment. Students who do not fully address all of the components of the assignment as stated in the instructions as well as the grading rubric below will have to be content with the grade they earned.
Please use MLA format.
Your paper will be graded according to the following rubric:
Grading Rubric:
The following standards are numbered in order of importance for grading.
1.Essay demonstrates an understanding of the material: The student has correctly grasped a philosophical problem or question, has explained it accurately, and on the basis of a substantially correct interpretation of any texts involved. Key terms are used correctly. The essay shows evidence of the student's independent thought, and is written in his or her distinctive voice. Short (one sentence) quota.
English 104Argument AnalysisThe AssignmentDue No l.docx
English 104
Argument Analysis
The Assignment:
Due: No later than October 10, 2016
Must be MLA format only!!
Select an online editorial article about a current issue. (i.e.: Presidential Candidates, Labor Union Influence on Government, The Affordable Health Care Act, Illegal Immigration, Entitlement programs, etc.) You may choose ANY issue; the list above is NOT exhaustive.
The article MUST be an op-ed (editorial) piece, as it must present an argument of some type. You may not use a straight news story.
Read the article and decide what perspective the writer is taking on a particular issue.
Submit a Minimum 3-page analysis of the writer’s argument. And works cited, make sure to follow the Don’t’s of writing and include Parenthetical refrencing.
Paper must include:
· A discussion of the author’s thesis
· Whether he/she employs faulty reasoning (see fallacy assignment below) in the discussion.
· What he/she could have done to present a more thorough argument (may include more consideration of the opposing viewpoint)
· A thorough discussion of the main points of the article and whether or not he/she has provided adequate support to prove his/her thesis.
· A conclusion that discusses the effectiveness of the chosen article in regards to the author’s intent.
Include a link to the article on the Works Cited page.
You may choose whomever you wish; he/she DOES NOT have to appear on the list below.
Some commentators to consider when looking for an article:
Larry Elder
Star Parker
Sean Hannity
Alan Colmes
Michelle Malkin
John Ziegler
Bill O’Reilly
Chris Matthews
Leslie Marshall
The following link provides a list of controversial commentators (some listed above) you may wish to choose from.
http://www.usnews.com/news/washington-whispers/slideshows/top-10-most-hated-news-commentators
Fallacies:
Look over the fallacy discussion and familiarize yourself with some common every day fallacies (i.e.: Post Hoc, False Analogy, Hasty Generalization, Slippery Slope, Straw Man, Begging the Question, Red Herring, Poisoning the Well, Ad Hominem).
Logical Fallacies Handlist:
Fallacies are statements that might sound reasonable or superficially true but are actually flawed or dishonest. When readers detect them, these logical fallacies backfire by making the audience think the writer is (a) unintelligent or (b) deceptive. It is important to avoid them in your own arguments, and it is also important to be able to spot them in others' arguments so a false line of reasoning won't fool you. Think of this as intellectual kung-fu: the art of self-defense in a debate. In general, one useful way to organize fallacies is by category. Below are fallacies of relevance, component fallacies, fallacies of ambiguity, and fallacies of omission.
FALLACIES OF RELEVANCE: These fallacies appeal to evidence or examples that are not relevant to the argument at hand.
Appeal to Force (Argumentum Ad Baculum or the "Might-Makes-Right" Fallacy): Th ...
Third EssayLearning to Write about DifferenceREADING .docx
Third Essay:
Learning to Write about Difference
READING
:
Rereading America
, from chapter five:
Parrillo, “Causes of Prejudice”
Fredrickson, “Models of American Ethnic relations: A Historical Perspective”
Harris and Carbado, “Loot or Find:
Fact or Frame?”
Kaplan, “Barack Obama:
“Miles Traveled, Miles to Go”
CONTEXT
:
Making arguments in our lives usually means persuading an audience; often it means, if it is a real argument, addressing a group that is not completely open to hearing and understanding our point of view.
This assignment will address two issues:
·
Building an argument using convincing textual evidence
·
Writing in order to persuade an unsympathetic argument
THE ASSIGNMENT
:
Chapter 5 in Rereading America addresses the history and present realities of the tensions that have surrounded, and still surround, racial and ethnic differences in the United States.
We can broaden the range of this topic to include areas of class, sexual orientation, religion, gender, and political affiliation, at the least.
Each of these categories, including race, are populated by groups we could call “others”—groups that both are seen by the majority culture as being somehow “outside” and are viewed by the majority culture with a degree of suspicion.
In a four-and-a-half to five page, double-spaced, 12-point typeface essay, argue for how some of the ideas in TWO of the essays in chapter 5 of
Rereading America
apply to ONE of these groups of “others” of your choosing. Define the group carefully. Write to an audience who would doubt the validity of your topic, the book’s texts, and your argument. If you choose to write about an “other” that is defined by race or ethnicity, be specific in naming this group (e.g., Korean, or mixed-race, or Persian).
For example, I might take the arguments in Harris and Carbado’s essay and apply them to similar thought patterns I see in Orange County about people whom the majority culture in the OC might consider “others”—those out of the cultural mainstream. Perhaps I would select French people as my group of others. I could talk about how Orange Countians see French speaking people suspiciously—people who spend too much time thinking about food. This would be a fairly silly paper, but I could nonetheless choose this topic.
IMPORTANT ADVICE
: Read all four essays and the discussion board entries on the essays. Try choosing the focus of your essay by writing about ideas from the essays that strongly affect you; don’t start out with a particular group in mind. Once you have identified interesting ideas, then think about a group of “others.”
AUDIENCE
: Each of the assigned essays from
Rereading America
for this assignment are written for audiences that likely will not agree with the respective writer’s ideas. Note the following areas in both the essays you read, and in constructing your own essays:
·
Tone—how does the writer decide to present these issues to a potentially unsympathetic a.
Rhetoric Essay #1 Analyzing an Argument (Or Putting Con.docx
Rhetoric Essay #1
Analyzing an Argument
(Or: Putting Confirmation Bias to Work)
Task: Write a 3-4- page essay where you describe and analyze an argument, plus
a one-page reflection on confirmation bias.
For your first essay, you will analyze a text making a strong argument. The task is not to argue in favor of
a particular conclusion, but to examine the rhetorical moves the writer uses to make his or her case. You
choose the text, but but it must represent a point of view conflicting with something on the list of “five
things” about which you have strong feelings that you posted on the class blog. If stuck, you can choose a
subject you’ve thought of since. The idea is to engage, but that’s not the same as asking you to agree. One
way of thinking about it is as if your subject is like a table. What are its strongest and weakest legs?
Perhaps one “leg” is quite strong but if left on its own would it be more likely to “topple” so to speak?
Doing so will be hard. The best essays often benefit from subjects that use a range of rhetorical moves.
Essay must be typed and printed in a 12-point standard font, double-spaced, with a title, name, date, etc.
Stapled to workshop comments.
Deadlines
• Subject due to instructor by Tuesday, October 11 at 5:00 pm. Send URL or PDF or
equivalent by email to my Hawkmail account: [email protected]
• Rough draft workshop: Monday October 17.
• Last day for individualized instructor feedback: Friday, October 21.
• Final essay due: Monday, October 24
Examples of potential subjects:
For instance, if you said you think it’s too hard to start a small business, you will want to find someone
who has an informed opinion on the topic and arguing it’s easier than ever to start a small business. If
you tend to think one specific cause deserves blame for the murders at the Pulse nightclub in Orlando,
find something that takes a different tact. Or, say you have a more generalized belief like “the U.S. is
doing enough to protect itself,” you’ll want to find an article that argues for a specific policy or action that
makes the opposite point. The connection can be loose. (Example: “Stop Deploying Robot Zombies in
Nation’s Kindergartens!”) It can blur the lines between politics and entertainment, or have nothing to do
with politics. If you feel that Taylor Swift or Beyoncé is the best singer/performer of her generation, find
someone who is critical of that person, perhaps of a controversy about an album or song or statement. If
being patriotic is one of your five things, then you could find an article in support of Colin Kaepernick’s
protest, or vice versa. You can also choose something in the course-pack, understand that what you write
will be read as having had the advantage of class discussion.
Purpose:
Demonstrate your ability to critically analyze rhetorical moves without arguing on behalf of a question.
Use our natural inclination toward confirmation bias to help us “see” th ...
An Essay On Martin Luther King Jr Telegraph
Paper Writing Service
http://HelpWriting.net/An-Essay-On-Martin-Luther-King-Jr-Teleg
Critical Essays Joy Luck Club. Online assignment writing service.
Academic Paper Writing Service
http://HelpWriting.net/Critical-Essays-Joy-Luck-Club
Rhetorical Essay On Frederick Douglass
Essay Writing Service
http://HelpWriting.net/Rhetorical-Essay-On-Frederick-Douglass
Write A Reflection Essay. Your Ultimate Guide on Reflective Essay Writing by ...
50 Best Reflective Essay Examples (+Topic Samples) ᐅ TemplateLab. How to Write a Reflective Essay: Format, Tips and Examples | EssayPro .... Example Of Reflection Paper College - 50 Best Reflective Essay Examples .... A complete guide to writing a reflective essay | Oxbridge Essays - Self .... Example Self Reflection Essay - How to Write a Reflection Paper.
Essay about - Racism - InstructionsEssay – Argumentative Essay.docx
Essay about - Racism - Instructions
Essay –> Argumentative Essay –
Imagine you are a new attorney with a prestigious law firm working in Washington, D.C., and you must write a three-page essay on the topic of race in America that will be submitted to the Supreme Court. You will argue whether racism is or is no longer a significant issue for most Americans. After all, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was passed over 50 years ago and Barack Obama was elected president in 2008 and re-elected in 2012. Because you have been hired to do this work, you personally may or may not agree with the perspective you will argue. In fact, you have no choice which side to argue because this will be randomly assigned to you.
____ Racism is no longer a significant issue for most Americans.
__X_ Racism continues to be a significant issue for most Americans.
Essay requirements:
The length of the essay should be approximately three pages, double-spaced, approximately 750 - 880 words. Please limit the essay to no more than four and one-half pages, or 1,250 words maximum.
Your essay should include an introduction, at least three body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Your body paragraphs should follow the enhanced PIE structure we are learning in this class. (See Lab 2 for the 7-step process to building a perfect body paragraph below.)
Use at least three trustworthy sources to support your thesis / claim. You may use the sources posted in the Essay 1 – Racism folder in Canvas. (The term source means an article, a study, a book, a video, an essay, or other similar writings that offer ideas and research related to a topic.) Feel free to conduct additional research as well.
Avoid the first person use of “I” or “me” in the essay. This keeps the focus on the issue and not on you. Avoid “I believe” and “I think” and other similar terms since your claim should be based on facts and evidence rather than your opinion. (See Lab 3 below for more on this.)
Avoid writing “you” when speaking to the reader. It’s best to speak collectively, such as “We can all learn from this example” or “We as a nation must take steps….”
Use formal style, tone, and diction. Avoid slang, casual language, broad generalizations, and contractions in most cases. (See Lab 3 below for an overview of academic language.)
Include at least three direct quotations from the sources and paraphrase other statements. (Direct quotations are when you place quotation marks around sentences that are word-for-word by a source. Paraphrasing means writing a source’s ideas in your own words.) Be careful not to quote a source for too long in the essay. Intersperse quotations with paraphrases of what the source has to say. (See Lab 4 below for a lesson in how to integrate quotations into your essay.)
Please include a Works Cited to list all sources cited in the essay. List the sources in Works Cited in alphabetical order. If you have an author name, list it at the start of the entry by last name, followed by first name. (See .
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docx
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
"Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe...
Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of other biological materials, Ownership and period of protection
More Related Content
Similar to Eduu551 powerpoint1
Tips for EditorialsTips on Content of Letter· If a publicatio.docx
Tips for Editorials
Tips on Content of Letter:
· If a publication receives multiple letters on the same subject, the editor will choose one that says something in a new way or takes a unique angle.
· Focus your letter on one point on one subject. If you are commenting on a specific story in the paper, mention the headline and date. Cite the specific reference and sum it up in a sentence to refresh readers’ memories. Then point out facts that were left out, or refute or support facts that were stated.
· Be clear and concise. Shorter is better. Most papers want letters of 250 words or less. Magazines such as Time want even less.
· State your point early in the letter and support your point with facts.
· Know the audience of the publication. Technical information and long, multi-syllable words are often inappropriate for a general audience.
· If appropriate, mention your motivation or expertise in writing. For example, “As an Ohio State University student, I believe… and therefore x,” or “I am a director of a non-profit agency that serves families in poverty. Here is what my experience has been….That is why I believe y.”
General Logistical Tips:
Know and follow the policies and specifications of the publication to which you are submitting your letter. Except as noted, it is OK to send the same or similar letters to more than one publication. But don’t submit the same or similar letters to multiple papers in the same media market.
Always include your name, address, and daytime telephone number.
Don’t send specifically local letters to other localities.
General Tips:
Avoid clichés, name-calling, slang, and repetition.
Check your letter for grammar and fluidity, read it out loud to make sure the thoughts flow well.
Give it a catchy title.
How do you write a letter to the editor?
1. Begin the letter with a simple salutation.
Don’t worry if you don’t know the editor’s name. A simple, “To the Editor of the Lantern” is sufficient. If you have the editor’s name, however, you should use it to increase the possibility of your letter being read.
2. Grab the reader’s attention.
Get attention right away; your opening sentence is very important. It should make the reader want to read more.
3. Explain what the letter is about at the start.
Throughout your letter, remember the rule:
Be quick,
Be concise, and then
Be quiet.
Don’t make the editor or the general public wait to find out what you want to say. Tell them your key point at the beginning.
4. Explain why the issue is important.
If you are motivated enough to write a letter to a newspaper or magazine, the importance of your topic may seem clear to you. Remember, though, that the general public probably doesn’t share your background or the interest. Explain the issue and its importance simply. Use plain language that most people will understand.
5. Give evidence for any praise or criticism.
If you are writing a letter discussing a past or pending action, be clear in showing why ...
Alternative Dispute Resolution Essay.pdf
Alternative Dispute Resolution. Letter Essay Example | StudyHippo.com. Alternative Dispute Resolution Essay Example | Topics and Well Written .... (PDF) Approach to Alternative Dispute Resolution. Alternative Dispute Resolution - University Law - Marked by Teachers.com. Notes - Alternative Dispute Resolution - StuDocu. Dispute Resolution Essay | Legal Studies - Year 11 HSC | Thinkswap. 11+ Alternative Dispute Resolution Templates in PDF | DOC. Alternative Dispute Resolution Essay | LW462 - Alternative Dispute .... Alternative Dispute Resolution Case Study Example | Topics and Well .... Essay on Alternative Dispute Resolution | JUST5722 - Conflict .... Alternative Dispute Resolution Essays. Chapter Four | Alternative Dispute Resolution | Mediation. Alternative Dispute Resolution - Alternative Dispute Resolution .... Alternative dispute resolution essay - Alternative dispute resolution .... Alternative dispute resolution methods Essay Example | Topics and Well .... Alternative Dispute Resolution Essay Example | Sitedoct.org. Notes of Alternative Dispute Resolution - AJ 2017 Alternative Dispute .... (PDF) Mediation as alternative dispute resolution. Alternative Dispute Resolution Essay | LAW157 - Alternative Dispute .... Alternative Dispute Resolution Essay - A-Level Law - Marked by Teachers.com. Alternative Dispute Resolution Clause Essay Example | Topics and Well ....
Writing AssignmentWrite a four page double-spaced argument anal.docx
Writing Assignment:
Write a four page double-spaced argument analysis paper in which you analyze the two letters by the clergymen and King. Put the letters in historical context by describing the rhetorical situation, with emphasis on the exigence, the audiences, and constraints. Explain the issue from both points of view. Summarize the positions taken on the issue in both letters. Describe and evaluate the support, the warrants, and backing in both. Identify any fallacies and describe how the author’s use rebuttal. Finally, evaluate the ethical and unethical qualities that appear in the letters and write a conclusion in which you make a claim about the relative effectiveness of the two letters. Which letter is more effective? Why? Have you views been modified or changed? How?
Writing the Argument Analysis Paper
Create a structure for your essay:
For example make a list or an outline.
Place your ideas in an order that makes sense. Since you will be comparing and contrasting you may want to write first about the clergymen’s letter and then King’s letter and draw conclusions about both of them at the end.
Explain the rhetorical situation. Be sure to place the letters in historical context and describe the audience that both are addressing. Then explain the issue from both points of view and summarize the authors’ positions.
State the claims and describe the support in both letters.
Include summarized, paraphrased, or quoted material from the letters to provide evidence to support your main points. (use MLA format for citations)
Write a conclusion in which you evaluate the letters. Are they ethical or unethical? Is one more effective and convincing than the other? Why?
Focus Topics to Help You Analyze the Letters
Answer the questions that accompany the eight focus topics listed.
1. Rhetorical Situation: Consider each of these points.
0. What is the exigence for these two letters? What caused the authors to write them? What was the problem? Was it a new or recurring problem?
0. Who is the audience for the clergyman’s letter/ For King’s letter? What is the nature of these audiences? Can they be convinced? What are the expected outcomes?
0. What are the constraints? Speculate about the beliefs, attitudes, habits, and traditions that were in place that limited or constrained both the white clergyman and King. How did these constraining circumstances influence the audience for both letters at that time/
0. Think about the authors of both letters. Who are they/ speculate about their backgrounds, experience, affiliations, and values. What motivated them to write/
0. What kind of text is each letter? What effect do its special qualities and features have on an audience?
0. Think about yourself as a reader. What is your position on the issue/ do you experience constraints as read? Do you perceive common ground with either the clergyman or King, or both? Describe it. Are you influenced by these letters? How?
1. Organization and claims:
Divide each le.
Capstone Paper Introduction Students will select a s.docx
Capstone Paper
Introduction
Students will select a specific problem or policy discussed in the Alexander book and discuss the ramifications of the problem/policy within the criminal justice system. The paper should take the form of a problem/policy analysis and should indicate whether the problem is theoretical or practical (applied). Furthermore, students should include, at minimum, answers to the problem including, but not limited to, who, what, when, where, why, and how the problem originated within the criminal justice system as well as how it continues to be a problem.
1-2 pages
Literature Review
Students are expected to read and review historical and current research on their specific problem; this includes prior studies on the problem selected.
3-4 pages
Criminological Theory
Students should review criminological theory and ascertain how the problem/policy is rooted in a particular theory. Students should consult the text from Nature and Causes of Crime/Criminological Theory as a starting place.
1-2 pages
Cases
Students should review case law to determine the extent to which the problem/policy has been reviewed by the courts and provide a thorough background of the case(s) and the judicial opinion. If the problem/policy has not yet been reviewed by the courts, students should research case precedents that are closely aligned to the problem.
1-2 pages
Position
Students must clearly articulate their opinion on the problem/policy and how it should be addressed. A plan of action to support your position is expected.
1-2 pages
Alternative Positions
Provide a critique of logical alternatives to dealing with the problem.
1-2 pages
Critical Reflection
Using critical thinking and reflection skills, explain how the problem/policy, your position (and alternatives) affect police, courts, and corrections.
1-2 pages
Conclusion
Finally, provide a final description of the problem, theory, literature review, position and alternative positions.
1-2 pages
References
A detailed References section including a minimum of 15 resources is required. Resources may include professional trade journals, books, peer reviewed publications, and government publications. Wikipedia is not permitted. Internet resources will be limited to EBSCO, NCJRS, BJA, BJS, DOJ, OJJDP, and FirstGov. APA format must be used. Papers with incorrect APA format will be returned with no grade for revision.
His 330
Fall 2013
Writing Assignments—Tupelo
General Guidelines
Writing assignments should be doubled spaced and use a standard 12 point font. Remember to always put your name on your work.
Writing assignments should be submitted via SafeAssign on Blackboard before class on the date listed below. One letter grade will be deducted for each day the paper is late. Papers more than four days late will not be graded and given a zero. It is your responsibility to insure that papers are properly submitted to Blackboard on time. If in doubt, email a ...
Reading Scientific Articles - Agripharmatech - Library A
Paper Writing Service
http://HelpWriting.net/Reading-Scientific-Articles---Agripharm
eflection Paper Topics with Grading RubricYou will write a 1000-.docx
eflection Paper Topics with Grading Rubric
You will write a 1000-1500 word response to your chosen paper topic from the list below. See Course Outline for the due date.
This assignment is worth 300 points, or 30% of your grade.
DO NOT USE ANY SOURCES OTHER THAN THE DALRYMPLE ARTICLE AND YOUR TEXTBOOK.
YOU WILL ATTACH A FILE IN THE BOX AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE.
Learning Objectives:
Students will demonstrate their ability to construct arguments about issues of both personal and universal significance. Their writing should demonstrate that they can construct cogent, concise, and logically coherent arguments.
Assessment:
Students should demonstrate that they can distinguish the relevant points that form a logically coherent argument. They should also be able to construct criticisms which effectively undermine, through the use of appropriate counter-examples, some premise of that argument.
Your assignment is to read any ONE of the following four articles:
The Frivolity of Evil
How and How Not to Love Mankind
What We Have to Lose
Roads to Serfdom
Then, FOR THE ARTICLE YOU CHOOSE TO WRITE ON, you will type a 1000-1500 word response in which you address EACH of the following points IN YOUR OWN WORDS: 1) What is the author's main argument? 2) How does he support his main argument (evidence, ancillary arguments, etc.)? 3) Do you agree or disagree with him? 4) Why or why not? 5) Apply the insights of at least two of the readings we have studied in this course (in chapters 1-9) to your analysis. Make sure to give a substantive explanation of how the philosophers' insights are relevant to the topic you are discussing.
A WORD OF WARNING: These articles are rather long and complex. The author likes to make extensive use of his rather copious vocabulary, so I strongly urge you to have dictionary.com handy as you work your way through your chosen article. The purpose of this essay assignment is for you to demonstrate your ability to discuss, analyze, and evaluate complex philosophic arguments. I am confident that the reading assignments, tests, and discussion boards will have prepared you for this final, and no doubt challenging, essay assignment.
Note: I only allow one attempt on this assignment. Students who do not fully address all of the components of the assignment as stated in the instructions as well as the grading rubric below will have to be content with the grade they earned.
Please use MLA format.
Your paper will be graded according to the following rubric:
Grading Rubric:
The following standards are numbered in order of importance for grading.
1.Essay demonstrates an understanding of the material: The student has correctly grasped a philosophical problem or question, has explained it accurately, and on the basis of a substantially correct interpretation of any texts involved. Key terms are used correctly. The essay shows evidence of the student's independent thought, and is written in his or her distinctive voice. Short (one sentence) quota.
English 104Argument AnalysisThe AssignmentDue No l.docx
English 104
Argument Analysis
The Assignment:
Due: No later than October 10, 2016
Must be MLA format only!!
Select an online editorial article about a current issue. (i.e.: Presidential Candidates, Labor Union Influence on Government, The Affordable Health Care Act, Illegal Immigration, Entitlement programs, etc.) You may choose ANY issue; the list above is NOT exhaustive.
The article MUST be an op-ed (editorial) piece, as it must present an argument of some type. You may not use a straight news story.
Read the article and decide what perspective the writer is taking on a particular issue.
Submit a Minimum 3-page analysis of the writer’s argument. And works cited, make sure to follow the Don’t’s of writing and include Parenthetical refrencing.
Paper must include:
· A discussion of the author’s thesis
· Whether he/she employs faulty reasoning (see fallacy assignment below) in the discussion.
· What he/she could have done to present a more thorough argument (may include more consideration of the opposing viewpoint)
· A thorough discussion of the main points of the article and whether or not he/she has provided adequate support to prove his/her thesis.
· A conclusion that discusses the effectiveness of the chosen article in regards to the author’s intent.
Include a link to the article on the Works Cited page.
You may choose whomever you wish; he/she DOES NOT have to appear on the list below.
Some commentators to consider when looking for an article:
Larry Elder
Star Parker
Sean Hannity
Alan Colmes
Michelle Malkin
John Ziegler
Bill O’Reilly
Chris Matthews
Leslie Marshall
The following link provides a list of controversial commentators (some listed above) you may wish to choose from.
http://www.usnews.com/news/washington-whispers/slideshows/top-10-most-hated-news-commentators
Fallacies:
Look over the fallacy discussion and familiarize yourself with some common every day fallacies (i.e.: Post Hoc, False Analogy, Hasty Generalization, Slippery Slope, Straw Man, Begging the Question, Red Herring, Poisoning the Well, Ad Hominem).
Logical Fallacies Handlist:
Fallacies are statements that might sound reasonable or superficially true but are actually flawed or dishonest. When readers detect them, these logical fallacies backfire by making the audience think the writer is (a) unintelligent or (b) deceptive. It is important to avoid them in your own arguments, and it is also important to be able to spot them in others' arguments so a false line of reasoning won't fool you. Think of this as intellectual kung-fu: the art of self-defense in a debate. In general, one useful way to organize fallacies is by category. Below are fallacies of relevance, component fallacies, fallacies of ambiguity, and fallacies of omission.
FALLACIES OF RELEVANCE: These fallacies appeal to evidence or examples that are not relevant to the argument at hand.
Appeal to Force (Argumentum Ad Baculum or the "Might-Makes-Right" Fallacy): Th ...
Third EssayLearning to Write about DifferenceREADING .docx
Third Essay:
Learning to Write about Difference
READING
:
Rereading America
, from chapter five:
Parrillo, “Causes of Prejudice”
Fredrickson, “Models of American Ethnic relations: A Historical Perspective”
Harris and Carbado, “Loot or Find:
Fact or Frame?”
Kaplan, “Barack Obama:
“Miles Traveled, Miles to Go”
CONTEXT
:
Making arguments in our lives usually means persuading an audience; often it means, if it is a real argument, addressing a group that is not completely open to hearing and understanding our point of view.
This assignment will address two issues:
·
Building an argument using convincing textual evidence
·
Writing in order to persuade an unsympathetic argument
THE ASSIGNMENT
:
Chapter 5 in Rereading America addresses the history and present realities of the tensions that have surrounded, and still surround, racial and ethnic differences in the United States.
We can broaden the range of this topic to include areas of class, sexual orientation, religion, gender, and political affiliation, at the least.
Each of these categories, including race, are populated by groups we could call “others”—groups that both are seen by the majority culture as being somehow “outside” and are viewed by the majority culture with a degree of suspicion.
In a four-and-a-half to five page, double-spaced, 12-point typeface essay, argue for how some of the ideas in TWO of the essays in chapter 5 of
Rereading America
apply to ONE of these groups of “others” of your choosing. Define the group carefully. Write to an audience who would doubt the validity of your topic, the book’s texts, and your argument. If you choose to write about an “other” that is defined by race or ethnicity, be specific in naming this group (e.g., Korean, or mixed-race, or Persian).
For example, I might take the arguments in Harris and Carbado’s essay and apply them to similar thought patterns I see in Orange County about people whom the majority culture in the OC might consider “others”—those out of the cultural mainstream. Perhaps I would select French people as my group of others. I could talk about how Orange Countians see French speaking people suspiciously—people who spend too much time thinking about food. This would be a fairly silly paper, but I could nonetheless choose this topic.
IMPORTANT ADVICE
: Read all four essays and the discussion board entries on the essays. Try choosing the focus of your essay by writing about ideas from the essays that strongly affect you; don’t start out with a particular group in mind. Once you have identified interesting ideas, then think about a group of “others.”
AUDIENCE
: Each of the assigned essays from
Rereading America
for this assignment are written for audiences that likely will not agree with the respective writer’s ideas. Note the following areas in both the essays you read, and in constructing your own essays:
·
Tone—how does the writer decide to present these issues to a potentially unsympathetic a.
Rhetoric Essay #1 Analyzing an Argument (Or Putting Con.docx
Rhetoric Essay #1
Analyzing an Argument
(Or: Putting Confirmation Bias to Work)
Task: Write a 3-4- page essay where you describe and analyze an argument, plus
a one-page reflection on confirmation bias.
For your first essay, you will analyze a text making a strong argument. The task is not to argue in favor of
a particular conclusion, but to examine the rhetorical moves the writer uses to make his or her case. You
choose the text, but but it must represent a point of view conflicting with something on the list of “five
things” about which you have strong feelings that you posted on the class blog. If stuck, you can choose a
subject you’ve thought of since. The idea is to engage, but that’s not the same as asking you to agree. One
way of thinking about it is as if your subject is like a table. What are its strongest and weakest legs?
Perhaps one “leg” is quite strong but if left on its own would it be more likely to “topple” so to speak?
Doing so will be hard. The best essays often benefit from subjects that use a range of rhetorical moves.
Essay must be typed and printed in a 12-point standard font, double-spaced, with a title, name, date, etc.
Stapled to workshop comments.
Deadlines
• Subject due to instructor by Tuesday, October 11 at 5:00 pm. Send URL or PDF or
equivalent by email to my Hawkmail account: [email protected]
• Rough draft workshop: Monday October 17.
• Last day for individualized instructor feedback: Friday, October 21.
• Final essay due: Monday, October 24
Examples of potential subjects:
For instance, if you said you think it’s too hard to start a small business, you will want to find someone
who has an informed opinion on the topic and arguing it’s easier than ever to start a small business. If
you tend to think one specific cause deserves blame for the murders at the Pulse nightclub in Orlando,
find something that takes a different tact. Or, say you have a more generalized belief like “the U.S. is
doing enough to protect itself,” you’ll want to find an article that argues for a specific policy or action that
makes the opposite point. The connection can be loose. (Example: “Stop Deploying Robot Zombies in
Nation’s Kindergartens!”) It can blur the lines between politics and entertainment, or have nothing to do
with politics. If you feel that Taylor Swift or Beyoncé is the best singer/performer of her generation, find
someone who is critical of that person, perhaps of a controversy about an album or song or statement. If
being patriotic is one of your five things, then you could find an article in support of Colin Kaepernick’s
protest, or vice versa. You can also choose something in the course-pack, understand that what you write
will be read as having had the advantage of class discussion.
Purpose:
Demonstrate your ability to critically analyze rhetorical moves without arguing on behalf of a question.
Use our natural inclination toward confirmation bias to help us “see” th ...
An Essay On Martin Luther King Jr Telegraph
Paper Writing Service
http://HelpWriting.net/An-Essay-On-Martin-Luther-King-Jr-Teleg
Critical Essays Joy Luck Club. Online assignment writing service.
Academic Paper Writing Service
http://HelpWriting.net/Critical-Essays-Joy-Luck-Club
Rhetorical Essay On Frederick Douglass
Essay Writing Service
http://HelpWriting.net/Rhetorical-Essay-On-Frederick-Douglass
Write A Reflection Essay. Your Ultimate Guide on Reflective Essay Writing by ...
50 Best Reflective Essay Examples (+Topic Samples) ᐅ TemplateLab. How to Write a Reflective Essay: Format, Tips and Examples | EssayPro .... Example Of Reflection Paper College - 50 Best Reflective Essay Examples .... A complete guide to writing a reflective essay | Oxbridge Essays - Self .... Example Self Reflection Essay - How to Write a Reflection Paper.
Essay about - Racism - InstructionsEssay – Argumentative Essay.docx
Essay about - Racism - Instructions
Essay –> Argumentative Essay –
Imagine you are a new attorney with a prestigious law firm working in Washington, D.C., and you must write a three-page essay on the topic of race in America that will be submitted to the Supreme Court. You will argue whether racism is or is no longer a significant issue for most Americans. After all, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was passed over 50 years ago and Barack Obama was elected president in 2008 and re-elected in 2012. Because you have been hired to do this work, you personally may or may not agree with the perspective you will argue. In fact, you have no choice which side to argue because this will be randomly assigned to you.
____ Racism is no longer a significant issue for most Americans.
__X_ Racism continues to be a significant issue for most Americans.
Essay requirements:
The length of the essay should be approximately three pages, double-spaced, approximately 750 - 880 words. Please limit the essay to no more than four and one-half pages, or 1,250 words maximum.
Your essay should include an introduction, at least three body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Your body paragraphs should follow the enhanced PIE structure we are learning in this class. (See Lab 2 for the 7-step process to building a perfect body paragraph below.)
Use at least three trustworthy sources to support your thesis / claim. You may use the sources posted in the Essay 1 – Racism folder in Canvas. (The term source means an article, a study, a book, a video, an essay, or other similar writings that offer ideas and research related to a topic.) Feel free to conduct additional research as well.
Avoid the first person use of “I” or “me” in the essay. This keeps the focus on the issue and not on you. Avoid “I believe” and “I think” and other similar terms since your claim should be based on facts and evidence rather than your opinion. (See Lab 3 below for more on this.)
Avoid writing “you” when speaking to the reader. It’s best to speak collectively, such as “We can all learn from this example” or “We as a nation must take steps….”
Use formal style, tone, and diction. Avoid slang, casual language, broad generalizations, and contractions in most cases. (See Lab 3 below for an overview of academic language.)
Include at least three direct quotations from the sources and paraphrase other statements. (Direct quotations are when you place quotation marks around sentences that are word-for-word by a source. Paraphrasing means writing a source’s ideas in your own words.) Be careful not to quote a source for too long in the essay. Intersperse quotations with paraphrases of what the source has to say. (See Lab 4 below for a lesson in how to integrate quotations into your essay.)
Please include a Works Cited to list all sources cited in the essay. List the sources in Works Cited in alphabetical order. If you have an author name, list it at the start of the entry by last name, followed by first name. (See .
Similar to Eduu551 powerpoint1 (20)
Tips for EditorialsTips on Content of Letter· If a publicatio.docx
Tips for EditorialsTips on Content of Letter· If a publicatio.docx
Writing AssignmentWrite a four page double-spaced argument anal.docx
Writing AssignmentWrite a four page double-spaced argument anal.docx
Capstone Paper Introduction Students will select a s.docx
Capstone Paper Introduction Students will select a s.docx
Reading Scientific Articles - Agripharmatech - Library A
Reading Scientific Articles - Agripharmatech - Library A
eflection Paper Topics with Grading RubricYou will write a 1000-.docx
eflection Paper Topics with Grading RubricYou will write a 1000-.docx
English 104Argument AnalysisThe AssignmentDue No l.docx
English 104Argument AnalysisThe AssignmentDue No l.docx
Elit 48 c essay #2 anzuldua, kingston, cisneros, alexie
Elit 48 c essay #2 anzuldua, kingston, cisneros, alexie
Third EssayLearning to Write about DifferenceREADING .docx
Third EssayLearning to Write about DifferenceREADING .docx
Rhetoric Essay #1 Analyzing an Argument (Or Putting Con.docx
Rhetoric Essay #1 Analyzing an Argument (Or Putting Con.docx
Critical Essays Joy Luck Club. Online assignment writing service.
Critical Essays Joy Luck Club. Online assignment writing service.
Write A Reflection Essay. Your Ultimate Guide on Reflective Essay Writing by ...
Write A Reflection Essay. Your Ultimate Guide on Reflective Essay Writing by ...
Essay about - Racism - InstructionsEssay – Argumentative Essay.docx
Essay about - Racism - InstructionsEssay – Argumentative Essay.docx
Recently uploaded
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docx
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
"Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe...
Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of other biological materials, Ownership and period of protection
Normal Labour/ Stages of Labour/ Mechanism of Labour
Normal labor is also termed spontaneous labor, defined as the natural physiological process through which the fetus, placenta, and membranes are expelled from the uterus through the birth canal at term (37 to 42 weeks
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Chapter -12, Antibiotics (One Page Notes).pdf
This is a notes for the D.Pharm students and related to the antibiotic drugs.
Digital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and Research
This Presentation in details discusses on Digital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and Research
The French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free download
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in Education
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI fund...
How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI funded books
Wednesday 22 May 2024, 14:00-15:00.
Model Attribute Check Company Auto Property
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH GLOBAL SUCCESS LỚP 3 - CẢ NĂM (CÓ FILE NGHE VÀ ĐÁP Á...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH GLOBAL SUCCESS LỚP 3 - CẢ NĂM (CÓ FILE NGHE VÀ ĐÁP Á...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
https://app.box.com/s/hqnndn05v4q5a4k4jd597rkdbda0fniiOverview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
This ppt include the description of the edible vaccine i.e. a new concept over the traditional vaccine administered by injection.
Advantages and Disadvantages of CMS from an SEO Perspective
Advantages and Disadvantages of CMS from an SEO Perspective
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic Imperative
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH ANSWERS.
A Survey of Techniques for Maximizing LLM Performance.pptx
A Survey of Techniques for Maximizing LLM Performance
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
Recently uploaded (20)
"Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe...
"Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe...
Normal Labour/ Stages of Labour/ Mechanism of Labour
Normal Labour/ Stages of Labour/ Mechanism of Labour
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdf
Digital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and Research
Digital Tools and AI for Teaching Learning and Research
The French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free download
The French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free download
How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI fund...
How libraries can support authors with open access requirements for UKRI fund...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH GLOBAL SUCCESS LỚP 3 - CẢ NĂM (CÓ FILE NGHE VÀ ĐÁP Á...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH GLOBAL SUCCESS LỚP 3 - CẢ NĂM (CÓ FILE NGHE VÀ ĐÁP Á...
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Advantages and Disadvantages of CMS from an SEO Perspective
Advantages and Disadvantages of CMS from an SEO Perspective
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
A Survey of Techniques for Maximizing LLM Performance.pptx
A Survey of Techniques for Maximizing LLM Performance.pptx
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
Eduu551 powerpoint1
- 1. The Crucible and the Salem Witch Trials 10th Grade Language Arts
- 3. In this lesson: We are going to examine the Power words can have. We are going to choose a side, explaining why we are For or Against the Salem Witch Trials, and write a letter to Sir William Phips, governor of Massachusetts in 1692. Governor Phips Governor Phips