Download as PDF, PPTX
Uploaded byInstituto Nacional de Evaluación Educativa
Educar en el s XXI. UIMP 2013. Finland: A Non-Competitive School System for a Competitive Market Economy
This document summarizes key aspects of education in Finland compared to other countries and reform movements: (1) Finland aims for equity and high quality in education for all students rather than being the best, and it is one of the most egalitarian countries. (2) Finland sees steady improvement in student performance on PISA exams while countries emphasizing competition, standardization, and school choice see little impact. (3) Key aspects of the "Finnish way" include collaboration, customization, trust-based responsibility rather than accountability, and ensuring equity and a balanced curriculum.
More Related Content
Similar to Educar en el s XXI. UIMP 2013. Finland: A Non-Competitive School System for a Competitive Market Economy
More from Instituto Nacional de Evaluación Educativa
Educar en el s XXI. UIMP 2013. Finland: A Non-Competitive School System for a Competitive Market Economy
- 1. T Pasi SAHLBERG CIMO Helsinki FINLAND Twitter:@ erg.com CIMO ‐Helsinki FINLAND Educar en el siglo XXI: experiencias internacionales @pasi_sa asisahlbe experiencias internacionales Santander, SPAIN 2 July 2013 hlberg pa
- 3. Three things you need to know (1) Finland has never aimed to be the best We will havethe bestGreat school for We will have the best school system in the world by year 2020! Great school for each and every child! y y
- 4.
- 5. Three things you need to know (3) Finland does well overall Economic competitiveness Finland #3 Technological Advancement Finland #1 Global Equity Index Finland #2 Corruption Perception Index Finland #2 Global Innovation Index Finland #4 Least Failed State Finland#1Finland #2 The UN Happiness IndexChild Poverty Rate Finland #1 Political Empowerment e U app ess de Finland #2 Child Poverty Rate Finland 4% Political Empowerment of Women Finland #2 Child Wellbeing Finland #4 Global Gender Gap Index Finland #2 To be a Mother Finland #1
- 6. Three things you need to know (3) Finland does well overall Economic competitiveness Finland #3 United States #7 Technological Advancement Finland #1 United States #9 Global Equity Index Finland #2 UnitedStates #48United States #7 Corruption Perception Index Finland #2 Global Innovation Index Finland #4 United States #48 Least Failed State Finland #1Finland #2 United States #24 United States #10 The UN Happiness IndexChild Poverty Rate Finland #1 United States #19 Political Empowerment e U app ess de Finland #2 United States #11 Child Poverty Rate Finland 4% United States 22% Political Empowerment of Women Finland #2 United States #55 Child Wellbeing Finland #4 United States #26 Global Gender Gap Index Finland #2 United States #22 United States #55 To be a Mother Finland #1 United States #26United States #22United States #30
- 7. How are schoolsystems being i d?improved?
- 8. Global Educational R f MtReform Movement COMPETITION STANDARDISATION STANDARDISED TESTING TOUGH ACCOUNTABILITY SCHOOL CHOICE
- 9.
- 10.
- 11. How successful GERMhas been? National averages of 15-year-old students learning outcomes in mathematics 2000-2009 2000 2003 2006 2009 540 560 520 540 480 500 460 420 440 USA England Canada Australia Japan New Zealand Netherlands Sweden Finland Source: OECD
- 12. How successful GERMhas been? National averages of 15-year-old students learning outcomes in mathematics 2000-2009 2000 2003 2006 2009 540 560 520 540 480 500 460 420 440 USA England Canada Australia Japan New Zealand Netherlands Sweden Finland Source: OECD
- 13. Global Educational R f Mt The Finnish WReform Movement Way COLLABORATIONCOMPETITION CUSTOMISATIONSTANDARDISATION STANDARDISED TESTING SAMPLE‐BASED ASSESSMENTS TRUST‐BASED RESPONSIBILITY TOUGH ACCOUNTABILITY EQUITYSCHOOL CHOICE
- 14. Students’ performance in reading, mathematics and science (e.g. PISA) Equity and quality in education High Performers’Club alityQu re per ec Equity Strength of t elationship bet rformance and conomic backg Equity the tween d socio‐ ground Source: OECD
- 15. Students’ performance in reading, mathematics and science (e.g. PISA) Equity and quality in education High Performers’Club Fair school fundingFair school funding Early childhood education Early childhood education Special needs education Special needs educationBalanced curriculum Balanced curriculumTeacherTeacher ality Fair school fundingFair school funding curriculumcurriculumTeacher professionalism Teacher professionalism Qu re per ec Equity Strength of t elationship bet rformance and conomic backg Equity the tween d socio‐ ground Source: OECD
- 16.
- 17. Finnish Lessons “Less testing morelearning”Less testing, more learning “More creativity, less standardisation” “L f h i it ”“Less focus on choice, more on equity” “Children must play”
- 18.