Research Report Presentation
Assessingthe Quality of Early Childhood Care and
Education
The Case of Mattu University Community School
Presented by: Netsanet Bekele, Meron Sahile, Mershaye
Cheru
• Advisor: Chimdessa (MA)
• Date: May 2025
2.
Introduction
• Early ChildhoodCare and Education (ECCE) is
foundational for lifelong learning.
• This study emphasizes its importance in shaping
holistic child development during critical years.
3.
Problem Statement
• DespiteECCE’s global recognition, Ethiopia still
faces challenges in quality delivery.
• Issues such as unqualified staff, inadequate resources,
and limited parental involvement persist.
4.
Motivation
• Improving ECCEensures equitable access to early
learning and better societal outcomes
• Mattu University Community School serves as a case
to explore practical ECCE challenges.
5.
General Objective
• Toevaluate the overall quality of ECCE at Mattu
University Community School and propose
actionable insights for improvement.
6.
Specific Objectives
• Thisstudy aims to:
1. Examine the curriculum and teaching quality.
2. Assess learning resources and infrastructure.
3. Analyze the role of parents and community in
ECCE.
7.
Research Questions
• Thestudy addresses:
1. Is the curriculum aligned with global and local
needs?
2. Are the facilities and materials sufficient?
3. How engaged are parents and the community?
8.
Significance of theStudy
• The research contributes to policy, teacher training,
and parental engagement improvements.
• It also provides insights for ECCE enhancement
across similar settings.
9.
Scope and Delimitations
•The study is confined to Mattu University
Community School, focusing solely on ECCE level.
• It reflects the context-specific findings, not
generalizable to the entire country.
10.
Theoretical Framework
• Thestudy uses Piaget’s cognitive theory, Vygotsky’s
social learning, and Erikson’s emotional development
model.
• Together, they inform a holistic ECCE approach.
11.
Methodology Overview
• Amixed-methods approach blends quantitative data
from surveys and qualitative insights from interviews
and observations.
• This ensures a balanced understanding.
12.
Data Collection Tools
•Tools included:
• Questionnaires for teachers and parents
• Semi-structured interviews
• Classroom observation checklists.
13.
Sampling & StudyArea
• The research was conducted at Mattu University
Community School using purposive sampling.
• Key participants included teachers, parents, and
administrators.
14.
Data Analysis Techniques
•Quantitative data was analyzed using SPSS, while
qualitative responses were thematically coded.
• Findings from both methods were triangulated.
15.
Key Findings –Demographics
• Most teachers held diplomas or degrees. Parents were
predominantly aged 30–40, representing actively
involved caregivers.
16.
Key Findings –Curriculum &
Teaching
• Curriculum aligns with standards and child-centered
methods are prevalent.
• However, lesson planning quality varies among
teachers.
17.
Key Findings –Resources &
Infrastructure
• Books and classroom space are mostly sufficient.
• Play equipment, a key to child development, is
notably lacking.
18.
Key Findings –Parental
Involvement
• While many parents attend meetings and help with
homework, 20% show low involvement, revealing a
need for stronger community outreach.
19.
Conclusion
• The schooloffers a good ECCE foundation, but
targeted improvements in planning, resources, and
parent engagement can enhance its effectiveness.
20.
Recommendations
• Provide lessonplanning training
• Acquire more play materials
• Encourage parent participation
• Monitor ECCE quality regularly.