Research Report Presentation
Assessing the Quality of Early Childhood Care and
Education
The Case of Mattu University Community School
Presented by: Netsanet Bekele, Meron Sahile, Mershaye
Cheru
• Advisor: Chimdessa (MA)
• Date: May 2025
Introduction
• Early Childhood Care and Education (ECCE) is
foundational for lifelong learning.
• This study emphasizes its importance in shaping
holistic child development during critical years.
Problem Statement
• Despite ECCE’s global recognition, Ethiopia still
faces challenges in quality delivery.
• Issues such as unqualified staff, inadequate resources,
and limited parental involvement persist.
Motivation
• Improving ECCE ensures equitable access to early
learning and better societal outcomes
• Mattu University Community School serves as a case
to explore practical ECCE challenges.
General Objective
• To evaluate the overall quality of ECCE at Mattu
University Community School and propose
actionable insights for improvement.
Specific Objectives
• This study aims to:
1. Examine the curriculum and teaching quality.
2. Assess learning resources and infrastructure.
3. Analyze the role of parents and community in
ECCE.
Research Questions
• The study addresses:
1. Is the curriculum aligned with global and local
needs?
2. Are the facilities and materials sufficient?
3. How engaged are parents and the community?
Significance of the Study
• The research contributes to policy, teacher training,
and parental engagement improvements.
• It also provides insights for ECCE enhancement
across similar settings.
Scope and Delimitations
• The study is confined to Mattu University
Community School, focusing solely on ECCE level.
• It reflects the context-specific findings, not
generalizable to the entire country.
Theoretical Framework
• The study uses Piaget’s cognitive theory, Vygotsky’s
social learning, and Erikson’s emotional development
model.
• Together, they inform a holistic ECCE approach.
Methodology Overview
• A mixed-methods approach blends quantitative data
from surveys and qualitative insights from interviews
and observations.
• This ensures a balanced understanding.
Data Collection Tools
• Tools included:
• Questionnaires for teachers and parents
• Semi-structured interviews
• Classroom observation checklists.
Sampling & Study Area
• The research was conducted at Mattu University
Community School using purposive sampling.
• Key participants included teachers, parents, and
administrators.
Data Analysis Techniques
• Quantitative data was analyzed using SPSS, while
qualitative responses were thematically coded.
• Findings from both methods were triangulated.
Key Findings – Demographics
• Most teachers held diplomas or degrees. Parents were
predominantly aged 30–40, representing actively
involved caregivers.
Key Findings – Curriculum &
Teaching
• Curriculum aligns with standards and child-centered
methods are prevalent.
• However, lesson planning quality varies among
teachers.
Key Findings – Resources &
Infrastructure
• Books and classroom space are mostly sufficient.
• Play equipment, a key to child development, is
notably lacking.
Key Findings – Parental
Involvement
• While many parents attend meetings and help with
homework, 20% show low involvement, revealing a
need for stronger community outreach.
Conclusion
• The school offers a good ECCE foundation, but
targeted improvements in planning, resources, and
parent engagement can enhance its effectiveness.
Recommendations
• Provide lesson planning training
• Acquire more play materials
• Encourage parent participation
• Monitor ECCE quality regularly.
Thank You

ECCE_Quality_research Report_Presentation.pptx

  • 1.
    Research Report Presentation Assessingthe Quality of Early Childhood Care and Education The Case of Mattu University Community School Presented by: Netsanet Bekele, Meron Sahile, Mershaye Cheru • Advisor: Chimdessa (MA) • Date: May 2025
  • 2.
    Introduction • Early ChildhoodCare and Education (ECCE) is foundational for lifelong learning. • This study emphasizes its importance in shaping holistic child development during critical years.
  • 3.
    Problem Statement • DespiteECCE’s global recognition, Ethiopia still faces challenges in quality delivery. • Issues such as unqualified staff, inadequate resources, and limited parental involvement persist.
  • 4.
    Motivation • Improving ECCEensures equitable access to early learning and better societal outcomes • Mattu University Community School serves as a case to explore practical ECCE challenges.
  • 5.
    General Objective • Toevaluate the overall quality of ECCE at Mattu University Community School and propose actionable insights for improvement.
  • 6.
    Specific Objectives • Thisstudy aims to: 1. Examine the curriculum and teaching quality. 2. Assess learning resources and infrastructure. 3. Analyze the role of parents and community in ECCE.
  • 7.
    Research Questions • Thestudy addresses: 1. Is the curriculum aligned with global and local needs? 2. Are the facilities and materials sufficient? 3. How engaged are parents and the community?
  • 8.
    Significance of theStudy • The research contributes to policy, teacher training, and parental engagement improvements. • It also provides insights for ECCE enhancement across similar settings.
  • 9.
    Scope and Delimitations •The study is confined to Mattu University Community School, focusing solely on ECCE level. • It reflects the context-specific findings, not generalizable to the entire country.
  • 10.
    Theoretical Framework • Thestudy uses Piaget’s cognitive theory, Vygotsky’s social learning, and Erikson’s emotional development model. • Together, they inform a holistic ECCE approach.
  • 11.
    Methodology Overview • Amixed-methods approach blends quantitative data from surveys and qualitative insights from interviews and observations. • This ensures a balanced understanding.
  • 12.
    Data Collection Tools •Tools included: • Questionnaires for teachers and parents • Semi-structured interviews • Classroom observation checklists.
  • 13.
    Sampling & StudyArea • The research was conducted at Mattu University Community School using purposive sampling. • Key participants included teachers, parents, and administrators.
  • 14.
    Data Analysis Techniques •Quantitative data was analyzed using SPSS, while qualitative responses were thematically coded. • Findings from both methods were triangulated.
  • 15.
    Key Findings –Demographics • Most teachers held diplomas or degrees. Parents were predominantly aged 30–40, representing actively involved caregivers.
  • 16.
    Key Findings –Curriculum & Teaching • Curriculum aligns with standards and child-centered methods are prevalent. • However, lesson planning quality varies among teachers.
  • 17.
    Key Findings –Resources & Infrastructure • Books and classroom space are mostly sufficient. • Play equipment, a key to child development, is notably lacking.
  • 18.
    Key Findings –Parental Involvement • While many parents attend meetings and help with homework, 20% show low involvement, revealing a need for stronger community outreach.
  • 19.
    Conclusion • The schooloffers a good ECCE foundation, but targeted improvements in planning, resources, and parent engagement can enhance its effectiveness.
  • 20.
    Recommendations • Provide lessonplanning training • Acquire more play materials • Encourage parent participation • Monitor ECCE quality regularly.
  • 21.