Closed, Open, and Sharing Science

1. Graham Steel
Open KNOWLEDGE
Open science working
group
Scotland

2. The “Cameron Neylon slide”
flickr.com/photos/24801682@N08/3662760870/

3. Intro slide
thedrum.com/news/2012/04/23/new-campaign-aims-tempt-residents-ditch-glasgow-and-
edinburgh-dundee

4. okfn.org/
EMPOWERING THROUGH
OPEN KNOWLEDGE

5. (1)

7. (2)

9. (3)

10. flickr.com/photos/51009184@N06/12326915314/sizes/o/
flickr.com/photos/v1ctor/5167082819/sizes/l/

11. (4)

13. chiccyclist.blogspot.co.uk/2012/08/we-know-that-feeling-of-floating.html

15. OR

16. (1)

17. flickr.com/photos/ben124/3465082266/

18. Academic Journals
were a great idea...

20. [1/2]

21. LEGACY PUBLISHERS
AND THEIR
HIGH PROFITS

23. alexholcombe.wordpress.com/2013/01/09/scholarly-publishers-and-their-high-profits/
*
* techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20120409/12273718432/publishing-isnt-job-anymore-its-button.shtml

24. Sebastian Alers ‫‏‬@textlabor

25. occamstypewriter.org/scurry/2012/08/13/sick-of-impact-factors/

26. scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/

30. researchinfonet.org/publish/finch/

32. BLONDIE OPEN ACCESS

33. (2)

37. Open
Science

38. http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.650799

40. flickr.com/photos/7914713@N05/3717315605/

41. OPEN SCIENCE
wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_science

42. •For the last 350 years, since the first scientific journal,
science has been locked into a commercial system, based
on print publishing
•With the Internet, there's a chance to be more open and
share results faster, to involve more people in the process
•Many scientists are now experimenting with greater
openness and collaboration
•But sometimes it can be a surprisingly hard sell, for a lot of
reasons
oRewards and incentives still tied into the old system
scienceblogs.com/confessions/2014/03/14/open-science-for-undergrads/

43. The internet offers us the first major
opportunity to improve [the] collective
long-term memory [of science], and to
create a collective short-term working
memory, a conversational commons for the
rapid collaborative development of ideas.
-Michael Nielsen

44. The process of scientific discovery - how we
do science - will change more over the
next 20 years than in the past 300 years.
-Michael Nielsen

45. (3)

46. Information
Sharing

47. Cameron neylon
blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2013/07/03/publishing-
evolution-disruption-and-the-future/

48. thehealthcaremarketer.wordpress.com/2014/02/

49. As scholars undertake a great migration to
online publishing, altmetrics stands to
provide an academic measurement of twitter
and other online activity
Jason Priem
blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2011/11/21/altmetrics-twitter/

50. Impactstory is an open-source, web-based tool
that helps researchers explore and share the
diverse impacts of all their research
products
impactstory.org
Discover the full
impact of your
research

53. SpotOn London 2013 Video: What’s your number? – Altmetrics session

55. DAVID COLQUHON

56. Sharing
MORE
information

57. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed

65. figshare.com/articles/Subscription_Journal_Workarounds/1019900

66. openaccessbutton.org/

68. youtube.com/watch?v=bsFGVzltwPU

74. (4)

76. slideshare.net/rossmounce/content-mining

85.  oad.simmons.edu/oadwiki/Data_repositories
 figshare.com/about
figshare is a repository where users can make all
of their research outputs available in a citable,
shareable and discoverable manner.

87. indiegogo.com/projects/button-2-0#home
youtube.com/watch?v=4AU4W8Yi1dk

88. Date: 20th June, 9am - 5:30pm
Venue: Business School, University of Edinburgh
edinpubconf.net

89.  Twitter @McDawg
 Email – steelgraham7@gmail.com
 Open Knowledge okfn.org
 These slides at slideshare.net/steelgraham