•    Media&Art&
•    Internet&Studies&
•    Audio&Engineering&and&Communica5ons&
•    Biological&Science&
•    Computer&Science&
•  Deleuze's&transla5on&of&Bergsonism,&par5cularly&
   regarding&intui5ve&method&is&a&fundamental&
   considera5on&within&crea5ve&produc5on,&be&it&
   programming,&scien5fic&inquiry&or&crea5ve&media&
   prac5ce.&For&Deleuze,&intui5ve&thought&is&more&like&a&
   narra5ve&than&an&instantaneous&‘eureka’&moment."In"
   order"to"understand"Deleuzian"intui1on"it"is"important"
   to"situate"it"within"the"Bergsonian"departure"from"a"
   structuralist"no1on"of"reality"in"terms"of"space,"in"
   favour"of"the"metaphysical"idea"that"reality"should"be"
   understood"in"terms"of"1me.&For&Deleuze,&intui5on&
   "reconcatenates&thought&to&beings&as&the&coKpresence&of&
   a&being&of&the&simulacrum&and&of&a&simulacrum&of&
   Being."&&
•  My"Research"offers"a"contribu1on"to"an"emerging"
   culturally"orientated"discourse"regarding"syncre1c,"
   hybridized"agency,"par1cularly"in"mixed"reality"data"
   transfer"systems."Recent"developments"in"bridging"
   autonomous"rela1onships"with"digital"representa1on"
   through"mixed"reality"interfacing,"have"brought"about"
   the"need"for"further"analysis"of"these"new"‘postC
   biological’,"hybridized"states"of"being"that"traverse"
   tradi1onal"paradigms"of"1me"and"space."Roy"AscoF’s"
   concept"of"syncre1sm"may"facilitate"further"
   understanding"of"mul1Clayered"world"views,"both"
   material"and"metaphysical,"that"are"emerging"from"our"
   engagement"with"such"pervasive"computa1onal"
   technologies"and"postCbiological"systems."Syncre1sm"
   has"tradi1onally"been"regarded"as"an"aFempt"to"
   harmonise"and"analogise."&
•  Ci1ng"recent"examples"of"prac1cal"
   research"outcomes,"this"research"
   analyses"what"Gilles"Deleuze"and"Fèlix"
   GuaFari"have"called"‘deterritorialisa1on’"
   of"the"human"body"through"its"
   dispersion"throughout"mul1ple"reality"
   manifesta1ons"and"how"mixed"reality"
   data"transfer"might"cons1tute"a"
   ‘reterritorialising’"effect"on"syncre1c"
   postCbiological"digital"iden1ty"
   construc1on."""
•  It&is&a&popular&belief&that&we&are&now,&through"a"
   media"convergent,"par1cipatory"culture"(that&is&
   integrated&socially&through&a&sub&network&of&
   plaMorms)&crea1ng&what&was&first&coined&in&
   1997&as&collec%ve'intelligence!by&Pierre&Lévy,&
   which&exists&in&a&‘global&village’&of&knowledge&
   (data)&transfer.&This"perspec1ve"evades"
   tradi1onal"mythological"no1ons"of"
   anthropomorphic"interac1on"as"it"moves"
   beyond"the"individual"and"into"a"universal"
   model"of"open"access"
Steigler&and&Promethean&Alchemy&
•  Networked&agency&destabilises&tradi5onal&
   orthodoxies&of&thought&through&challenging&
   no5ons&of&representa5on,&confron5ng&
   materialism,&accelera5ng&and&smoothing&social&
   engagement&and&most&importantly,&demanding&
   par5cipa5on&in&these&open&systems&of&
   collabora5ve&engagement.&This&has&redefined&
   our&understandings&of&consciousness&and&
   presence&in&way&that&requires&rethinking&
   everything&from&spirituality,&5me&and&space,&
   esotericism,&agency,&emergence,&quantum&
   coherence&through&to&ero5cism.&&
•  It"is"in"Deleuze's"dis1nc1on"between"
   different"degrees"of"'power'"that"I"see"
   Bergsonism,"that"is,"the"intui1ve"method,"
   and"Steigler's"technics"coming"together."In"
   looking"at"'power'"one"must"dis1nguish"
   between"the"two"French"words"puissance"
   and"pouvoir.&&
•  "In"social"terms,"puissance"is"immanent"
   power,"power"to"act"rather"than"power"to"
   dominate"another;"we"could"say"that"
   puissance"is"praxis"(in"which"equals"clash"or"
   act"together)"rather"than"poiesis"(in"which"
   others"are"maFer"to"be"formed"by"the"
   command"of"a"superior,"a"sense"of"
   transcendent"power"that"matches"what"
   pouvoir"indicates"for"Deleuze)”K&Steigler&&
Terra(Socio)Sonica:"Pouvior"Piussance"
What&my&projects&aim&to&aritculate&
•  Innova5ve&actualisa5ons&of&realK5me&data&
   transfer&systems&that&incorporate&biological&
   informa5on&and&mixed&reality&applica5ons&as&
   ar5s5c&mediums&are&a&crea5ng&a&new&no5on&
   of&postKbiological&digital&iden5ty.&&
•  PostKBiological&Discourse&Defined&in&
   Reference&to&Real&Time&Networked&Data&
   Transfer&
•  PostCbiological,"in"this"sense,"refers"to"a"redefini1on"of"
   the"embodied"subject"which"encompasses"their"loca1on"
   in"virtual"environments"as"well"as"in"the"physical."This"
   involves"the"crea1on,"through"art"prac1ce,"of"what"we"
   might"term"autonomous"agents"that"are"born"from"data"
   but"which"take"on"the"appearance"of"bioCforms"and"thus"
   become'embodied."At"the"same"1me"these"agents"are"a"
   differen1al"embodiment"of"the"‘bodies’,"which"first"
   generated"that"data"in"their"everyday"ac1vi1es.""
ROY&ASCOTT’S&PARADIGM&&&
In"regards"to"real"1me"digital"par1cipa1on"
this"thinking"interrogates"the"meaning"and"
consequences"of"the"possibility"of"such"
‘agents’"and,"in"doing"so,"enables"us"to"
ques1on"the"no1on"that"informa1on,"once"
extracted"from"the"embodied"self"and"placed"
within"a"computer"system,"becomes"
‘bodiless’."In"posing"that"ques1on"we"
discover"that,"contrary"to"what"we"might"at"
first"assume,"data"is"also"embodied.&&
Embodied&Informa5on&&
•  The&existence&of&‘embodied&informa5on’,&linked&
   to&and&yet&not&the&same&as&embodied&selves,&
   creates&an&interface&through&which&humans&
   nego5ate&their&iden55es&across&the&boundaries&
   of&different&reality&states,&more&or&less&virtual,&
   and&yet&always&involving&the&mapping&or&wri5ng&
   of&that&iden5ty&onto&‘a&body’.&By"having"bodies"
   both"material"and"virtual,"humans"have"become"
   postCbiological"even"as"their"biology"remains"the"
   primary"point"of"reference"for"the"data"
   gathering,"which"enables"this"transi1on"to"
   occur.&&
REDEFINING&DELEUZE&AND&GUATTARI&
    IN&REGARDS&TO&AGENCY&AND&REAL&
        TIME&VIRTUAL&SIMULATIONS&
                             &
•  In&Difference!and!Repe--on!Deleuze&introduces&the&
   no5on&of&deterritorialisa5on&(through&dispersion)&as&a&
  “dark&precursor”&that&“relates"heterogeneous"systems"
  and"even"completely"disparate"things.”"In"order"for"
  deterritorialisa1on"to"occur"there"must"be"some"form"
  of"agent"that"can"remain"constant"and"selfCreferent.&
  Deleuze&and&Guatarri&state&that:&“The"alignment"of"the"
  code"or"linearity"of"the"nucleic"sequence"in"fact"marks"
  a"threshold"of"deterritorialisa1on"of"the"“sign”"that"
  gives"it"a"new"ability"to"be"copied&and&makes&the&
  organism&more&deterritorialised&than&a&crystal:&only"
  something"deterritorialised"is"capable"of"reproducing"
  itself.”""
REDEFINING&DELEUZE&AND&GUATTARI&
   IN&REGARDS&TO&AGENCY&AND&REAL&
         TIME&VIRTUAL&SIMULATIONS&
•  Virtual"reality’"s"hybridiza1on"with"physical"and"biological"
                                 &
   architectures"is"constructed"by"the"methods"used"to"connect"
  the"environments.&The"combina1on"and"cohesion"of"
  heterogeneous"elements"is"generally"problema1c,&
  par5cularly&when&a&three&dimensional&space&is&primarily&
  viewed&on&a&two&dimensional&plane.&The"integra1on"of"virtual"
  elements"and"physical"environments"relies"on"bridging"the"
  two"spaces"with"dynamic"interfaces"that"are"simultaneously"
  accessible"and"able"to"be"openly"engaged"with,"edited"and"
  developed."To"create"integra1on"systems"that"network"
  physical"and"virtual"data"shared"loca1ons"are"required"in"
  order"to"represent"the"data"in"a"meaningful"way,"that"is"
  inclusive"of"both"environments.&&
ORGANTRADER2010&
ROY"ACOTT"AND"SYNCRETISM"
•  pathway:&>cyberne5c&>telema5c&
   >syncre5c&
•  mindset:&reac5ve&>interac5ve&
   >psychoac5ve&
CONTEXTUALISING&SYNCRETIC&POSTK
  BIOLOGICAL&DIGITAL&SYSTEMS&AND&
             IDENTITY&
•  All&virtual&environments&uses&a&a&form&of&
   agent&to&navigate&users&through&the&space.&
   While&these&are&usually&controlled&by&the&user&
   (avatars&can&of&course&be&automated&and&lei&
   on&their&own,&plus&there&are&bots&etc&being&
   regularly&created&and&used),&they&func5on&as&
   independent&to&their&‘master’&and&are&
   therefore&autonomous.&&
CONTEXTUALISING&SYNCRETIC&POSTK
  BIOLOGICAL&DIGITAL&SYSTEMS&AND&
             IDENTITY&
•  While&they&may&lose&their&func5on&without&a&
   user,&agents&do&s5ll&exist&as&digital&data/
   archives&and&oien&experiences&with&such&
   en55es&are&remembered&independently&of&
   any&knowledge&of&the&viewer.&&
Avatars&represent&a&transient,&con5nually&altered&
•  iden5ty,&usually&that&of&its&author&and&acts&as&an&
  agent,&through&which&users&can&engage&with&
  virtual&plaMorms.&This&becomes&par5cularly&
  interes5ng&in&unique&autonomous&systems&where&
  par5cipants&can&physically&interact&with&a&virtual&
  deterritorialised&‘self’&and&mediate&it&through&
  physical&engagement.&The&dispersion&of&mul5ple&
  autonomous&virtual&agents&via&mixed&reality&
  constructs&in&expands&deterritorialisa5on&to&
  include&reterritorialisa5on,&by&facilita5ng&a&
  dispersive&rela5onship&between&the&body&and&its&
  virtual&selfKreferent.&
•  In"the"same"way"that"a"digital"device"
   deterritorialises"and"reterritorialises"
   informa1on"through"binary"code,"the"
   augmenta1on"of"an"autonomous"agent"into"a"
   shared"space"with"the"body,"creates"new"
   opportuni1es"for"inves1ga1on"into"
   technology,"the"body"and"iden1ty.""
•  The"advent"of"nanobiology"has"called"
   for"a"rethinking"of"Hayles"and"
   Harraways’"postChuman"discourse"
   through"it"shibing"our"percep1on"of"
   organisms"from"micro"to"nano"scale.""
•  Today"nanotechnology"exists"as"a"living"
   sensa1on"of"the"future"of"human"existence:"In"
   Milburn’s"words,"“[A]"bodily"registra1on"of"
   poten1al"for"global"change.”"Brian"Massumi"
   states,"“The"body,sensor"of"change,"is"a"
   transducer"of"the"virtual.”"Through"exis1ng"in"
   these"virtual"representa1ons,"that"are"directly"
   linked"to"living"bioC"systems,"we"effec1vely"
   sense,"feel"and"think"in"a"way"that"hybridizes"
   the"virtual"with"scien1fic"inquiry,"and"
   therefore"we"require"a"discourse"that"
   addresses"how"this"does"in"fact"make"us"postC
   biological.""
“Just"as"cyberne1cs"analogizes"
differences"between"systems,"so"
syncre1sm"finds"likeness"between"
unlike"things."Syncre1c"thinking"
breaches"boundaries"and"subverts"
protocols."Thinking"out"of"the"box,"
tes1ng"the"limits"of"language,"
behaviour"and"thought"puts"the"
ar1st"on"the"edge"of"social"norms"
but"at"the"centre"of"human"
development.”"CAscoF""
•  As"art"is"fundamentally"an"ar1cula1on"of"the"
   human"condi1on"it"can"therefore"be"said"that"
   syncre1sm"is"also"a"valid"method"for"analysing"
   iden1ty"within"the"postCbiological"discourse."If"
   we"are"indeed"postCbiological"then"we"must"
   exist"in"syncre1c"mixed"reality"state."The"
   hybridisa1on"of"augmented"reality"and"virtual"
   environments"with"physical/biological"systems"
   calls"for"a"rethinking"of"not"only"posthuman"
   ideologies,"but"also"the"way"that"cyberne1c"
   systems"func1on.""
•  Through"the"crea1on"of"systems"that"
   engage"the"viewer"in"a"hybridized"
   par1cipatory"interac1on"with"mixed"
   reality"data"transfer,"these"no1ons"of"
   deterritorialisa1on,"reterritorialisa1on,"
   syncre1sm"and"post"biological"iden1ty"
   can"be"explored"in"a"more"intui1ve"and"
   involved"fashion.&&

DSRT Presentation Slides 2011

  • 2.
    •  Media&Art& •  Internet&Studies& •  Audio&Engineering&and&Communica5ons& •  Biological&Science& •  Computer&Science&
  • 3.
    •  Deleuze's&transla5on&of&Bergsonism,&par5cularly& regarding&intui5ve&method&is&a&fundamental& considera5on&within&crea5ve&produc5on,&be&it& programming,&scien5fic&inquiry&or&crea5ve&media& prac5ce.&For&Deleuze,&intui5ve&thought&is&more&like&a& narra5ve&than&an&instantaneous&‘eureka’&moment."In" order"to"understand"Deleuzian"intui1on"it"is"important" to"situate"it"within"the"Bergsonian"departure"from"a" structuralist"no1on"of"reality"in"terms"of"space,"in" favour"of"the"metaphysical"idea"that"reality"should"be" understood"in"terms"of"1me.&For&Deleuze,&intui5on& "reconcatenates&thought&to&beings&as&the&coKpresence&of& a&being&of&the&simulacrum&and&of&a&simulacrum&of& Being."&&
  • 4.
    •  My"Research"offers"a"contribu1on"to"an"emerging" culturally"orientated"discourse"regarding"syncre1c," hybridized"agency,"par1cularly"in"mixed"reality"data" transfer"systems."Recent"developments"in"bridging" autonomous"rela1onships"with"digital"representa1on" through"mixed"reality"interfacing,"have"brought"about" the"need"for"further"analysis"of"these"new"‘postC biological’,"hybridized"states"of"being"that"traverse" tradi1onal"paradigms"of"1me"and"space."Roy"AscoF’s" concept"of"syncre1sm"may"facilitate"further" understanding"of"mul1Clayered"world"views,"both" material"and"metaphysical,"that"are"emerging"from"our" engagement"with"such"pervasive"computa1onal" technologies"and"postCbiological"systems."Syncre1sm" has"tradi1onally"been"regarded"as"an"aFempt"to" harmonise"and"analogise."&
  • 5.
    •  Ci1ng"recent"examples"of"prac1cal" research"outcomes,"this"research" analyses"what"Gilles"Deleuze"and"Fèlix" GuaFari"have"called"‘deterritorialisa1on’" of"the"human"body"through"its" dispersion"throughout"mul1ple"reality" manifesta1ons"and"how"mixed"reality" data"transfer"might"cons1tute"a" ‘reterritorialising’"effect"on"syncre1c" postCbiological"digital"iden1ty" construc1on."""
  • 7.
    •  It&is&a&popular&belief&that&we&are&now,&through"a" media"convergent,"par1cipatory"culture"(that&is& integrated&socially&through&a&sub&network&of& plaMorms)&crea1ng&what&was&first&coined&in& 1997&as&collec%ve'intelligence!by&Pierre&Lévy,& which&exists&in&a&‘global&village’&of&knowledge& (data)&transfer.&This"perspec1ve"evades" tradi1onal"mythological"no1ons"of" anthropomorphic"interac1on"as"it"moves" beyond"the"individual"and"into"a"universal" model"of"open"access"
  • 8.
  • 9.
    •  Networked&agency&destabilises&tradi5onal& orthodoxies&of&thought&through&challenging& no5ons&of&representa5on,&confron5ng& materialism,&accelera5ng&and&smoothing&social& engagement&and&most&importantly,&demanding& par5cipa5on&in&these&open&systems&of& collabora5ve&engagement.&This&has&redefined& our&understandings&of&consciousness&and& presence&in&way&that&requires&rethinking& everything&from&spirituality,&5me&and&space,& esotericism,&agency,&emergence,&quantum& coherence&through&to&ero5cism.&&
  • 10.
    •  It"is"in"Deleuze's"dis1nc1on"between" different"degrees"of"'power'"that"I"see" Bergsonism,"that"is,"the"intui1ve"method," and"Steigler's"technics"coming"together."In" looking"at"'power'"one"must"dis1nguish" between"the"two"French"words"puissance" and"pouvoir.&&
  • 11.
    •  "In"social"terms,"puissance"is"immanent" power,"power"to"act"rather"than"power"to" dominate"another;"we"could"say"that" puissance"is"praxis"(in"which"equals"clash"or" act"together)"rather"than"poiesis"(in"which" others"are"maFer"to"be"formed"by"the" command"of"a"superior,"a"sense"of" transcendent"power"that"matches"what" pouvoir"indicates"for"Deleuze)”K&Steigler&&
  • 12.
  • 16.
    What&my&projects&aim&to&aritculate& •  Innova5ve&actualisa5ons&of&realK5me&data& transfer&systems&that&incorporate&biological& informa5on&and&mixed&reality&applica5ons&as& ar5s5c&mediums&are&a&crea5ng&a&new&no5on& of&postKbiological&digital&iden5ty.&&
  • 17.
    •  PostKBiological&Discourse&Defined&in& Reference&to&Real&Time&Networked&Data& Transfer& •  PostCbiological,"in"this"sense,"refers"to"a"redefini1on"of" the"embodied"subject"which"encompasses"their"loca1on" in"virtual"environments"as"well"as"in"the"physical."This" involves"the"crea1on,"through"art"prac1ce,"of"what"we" might"term"autonomous"agents"that"are"born"from"data" but"which"take"on"the"appearance"of"bioCforms"and"thus" become'embodied."At"the"same"1me"these"agents"are"a" differen1al"embodiment"of"the"‘bodies’,"which"first" generated"that"data"in"their"everyday"ac1vi1es.""
  • 18.
  • 19.
  • 20.
    Embodied&Informa5on&& •  The&existence&of&‘embodied&informa5on’,&linked& to&and&yet&not&the&same&as&embodied&selves,& creates&an&interface&through&which&humans& nego5ate&their&iden55es&across&the&boundaries& of&different&reality&states,&more&or&less&virtual,& and&yet&always&involving&the&mapping&or&wri5ng& of&that&iden5ty&onto&‘a&body’.&By"having"bodies" both"material"and"virtual,"humans"have"become" postCbiological"even"as"their"biology"remains"the" primary"point"of"reference"for"the"data" gathering,"which"enables"this"transi1on"to" occur.&&
  • 21.
    REDEFINING&DELEUZE&AND&GUATTARI& IN&REGARDS&TO&AGENCY&AND&REAL& TIME&VIRTUAL&SIMULATIONS& & •  In&Difference!and!Repe--on!Deleuze&introduces&the& no5on&of&deterritorialisa5on&(through&dispersion)&as&a& “dark&precursor”&that&“relates"heterogeneous"systems" and"even"completely"disparate"things.”"In"order"for" deterritorialisa1on"to"occur"there"must"be"some"form" of"agent"that"can"remain"constant"and"selfCreferent.& Deleuze&and&Guatarri&state&that:&“The"alignment"of"the" code"or"linearity"of"the"nucleic"sequence"in"fact"marks" a"threshold"of"deterritorialisa1on"of"the"“sign”"that" gives"it"a"new"ability"to"be"copied&and&makes&the& organism&more&deterritorialised&than&a&crystal:&only" something"deterritorialised"is"capable"of"reproducing" itself.”""
  • 22.
    REDEFINING&DELEUZE&AND&GUATTARI& IN&REGARDS&TO&AGENCY&AND&REAL& TIME&VIRTUAL&SIMULATIONS& •  Virtual"reality’"s"hybridiza1on"with"physical"and"biological" & architectures"is"constructed"by"the"methods"used"to"connect" the"environments.&The"combina1on"and"cohesion"of" heterogeneous"elements"is"generally"problema1c,& par5cularly&when&a&three&dimensional&space&is&primarily& viewed&on&a&two&dimensional&plane.&The"integra1on"of"virtual" elements"and"physical"environments"relies"on"bridging"the" two"spaces"with"dynamic"interfaces"that"are"simultaneously" accessible"and"able"to"be"openly"engaged"with,"edited"and" developed."To"create"integra1on"systems"that"network" physical"and"virtual"data"shared"loca1ons"are"required"in" order"to"represent"the"data"in"a"meaningful"way,"that"is" inclusive"of"both"environments.&&
  • 23.
  • 25.
    ROY"ACOTT"AND"SYNCRETISM" •  pathway:&>cyberne5c&>telema5c& >syncre5c& •  mindset:&reac5ve&>interac5ve& >psychoac5ve&
  • 28.
    CONTEXTUALISING&SYNCRETIC&POSTK BIOLOGICAL&DIGITAL&SYSTEMS&AND& IDENTITY& •  All&virtual&environments&uses&a&a&form&of& agent&to&navigate&users&through&the&space.& While&these&are&usually&controlled&by&the&user& (avatars&can&of&course&be&automated&and&lei& on&their&own,&plus&there&are&bots&etc&being& regularly&created&and&used),&they&func5on&as& independent&to&their&‘master’&and&are& therefore&autonomous.&&
  • 29.
    CONTEXTUALISING&SYNCRETIC&POSTK BIOLOGICAL&DIGITAL&SYSTEMS&AND& IDENTITY& •  While&they&may&lose&their&func5on&without&a& user,&agents&do&s5ll&exist&as&digital&data/ archives&and&oien&experiences&with&such& en55es&are&remembered&independently&of& any&knowledge&of&the&viewer.&&
  • 30.
    Avatars&represent&a&transient,&con5nually&altered& •  iden5ty,&usually&that&of&its&author&and&acts&as&an& agent,&through&which&users&can&engage&with& virtual&plaMorms.&This&becomes&par5cularly& interes5ng&in&unique&autonomous&systems&where& par5cipants&can&physically&interact&with&a&virtual& deterritorialised&‘self’&and&mediate&it&through& physical&engagement.&The&dispersion&of&mul5ple& autonomous&virtual&agents&via&mixed&reality& constructs&in&expands&deterritorialisa5on&to& include&reterritorialisa5on,&by&facilita5ng&a& dispersive&rela5onship&between&the&body&and&its& virtual&selfKreferent.&
  • 31.
    •  In"the"same"way"that"a"digital"device" deterritorialises"and"reterritorialises" informa1on"through"binary"code,"the" augmenta1on"of"an"autonomous"agent"into"a" shared"space"with"the"body,"creates"new" opportuni1es"for"inves1ga1on"into" technology,"the"body"and"iden1ty.""
  • 32.
    •  The"advent"of"nanobiology"has"called" for"a"rethinking"of"Hayles"and" Harraways’"postChuman"discourse" through"it"shibing"our"percep1on"of" organisms"from"micro"to"nano"scale.""
  • 33.
    •  Today"nanotechnology"exists"as"a"living" sensa1on"of"the"future"of"human"existence:"In" Milburn’s"words,"“[A]"bodily"registra1on"of" poten1al"for"global"change.”"Brian"Massumi" states,"“The"body,sensor"of"change,"is"a" transducer"of"the"virtual.”"Through"exis1ng"in" these"virtual"representa1ons,"that"are"directly" linked"to"living"bioC"systems,"we"effec1vely" sense,"feel"and"think"in"a"way"that"hybridizes" the"virtual"with"scien1fic"inquiry,"and" therefore"we"require"a"discourse"that" addresses"how"this"does"in"fact"make"us"postC biological.""
  • 34.
  • 35.
    •  As"art"is"fundamentally"an"ar1cula1on"of"the" human"condi1on"it"can"therefore"be"said"that" syncre1sm"is"also"a"valid"method"for"analysing" iden1ty"within"the"postCbiological"discourse."If" we"are"indeed"postCbiological"then"we"must" exist"in"syncre1c"mixed"reality"state."The" hybridisa1on"of"augmented"reality"and"virtual" environments"with"physical/biological"systems" calls"for"a"rethinking"of"not"only"posthuman" ideologies,"but"also"the"way"that"cyberne1c" systems"func1on.""
  • 36.
    •  Through"the"crea1on"of"systems"that" engage"the"viewer"in"a"hybridized" par1cipatory"interac1on"with"mixed" reality"data"transfer,"these"no1ons"of" deterritorialisa1on,"reterritorialisa1on," syncre1sm"and"post"biological"iden1ty" can"be"explored"in"a"more"intui1ve"and" involved"fashion.&&