POOJA MAHAPATRA
Monitoring ground deforma/on
from space
Case studies
Outline
•  Why?
•  How?
•  When? And when not?
•  What do the results look like?
- Examples
- Interac/ve demo
Ask ques/ons any/me!
Why?
Nepal
earthquake
Eyja0allajökull
volcano
Ground deforma/on
Ground deforma/on
Ground deforma/on
Ground deforma/on
Ground deforma/on
How can we efficiently
monitor large areas?
Monitoring from space
Interferometric
Synthe/c
Aperture
Radar
•  Wide area
•  Fine resolu/on
•  Through clouds and at night
•  Do not need advance
knowledge of deforma/on
•  Can look back /ll 1992
Image source: TRE
Looking back in =me
Image source: TRE
Measuring millimetres with InSAR~800km
Round trip ~ 30 million wavelengths
But we don’t know the exact number.
Measuring millimetres with InSAR
1st acquisi/on
Measuring millimetres with InSAR
1st acquisi/on 2nd acquisi/on
Deforma/on => Phase difference
Subsidence
Measuring millimetres with InSAR
1st acquisi/on 2nd acquisi/on
Deforma/on => Phase difference
Measured with mm-level precision
OK, that’s easy.
Where’s the catch?
Measuring millimetres with InSAR
1st acquisi/on 2nd acquisi/on
Deforma/on => Phase difference
How many
wavelengths?
1? 2? 3? 4? …
?.00
?.00
?.75
?.50
?.25
(2π radians = 360°)
Zeit
Phase unwrapping
InSAR measurement
Phase unwrapping
Deforma/on model*
* e.g. linear, quadra/c, seasonal or a combina/on
Phase unwrapping
Deforma/on model
Phase unwrapping
Deforma/on model
Phase unwrapping
Deforma/on model
Phase unwrapping
Deforma/on model
Phase unwrapping
What does it look like?
Image A
Image B
Interferogram =
Phase A - Phase B
Remove phase from
topography
satellite posi=ons
earth curvature
Amplitude
Amplitude
Phase
Phase
Challenge the future
27/10/15
Each color cycle is 28 mm
displacement towards
satellite
(0) 0 mm range change
(-1) 28 mm range decrease
(-2) 57 mm range decrease
(-10) 283 mm range decrease
(-20) 567 mm range decrease
17 August 1999, Izmit
earthquake (Turkey)
Interferogram
Major	limitations
Major	limitations	
Not possible to unwrap by simply coun/ng the fringes!
Why?
1st acquisi9on 2nd acquisi9on
?
Error sources
Decorrela/on
Shows up as ‘noise’
1st acquisi9on 2nd acquisi9on
?
Error sources
Atmospheric variability
Uncorrelated in /me, can
be ‘averaged out’
Challenge the future
•  Same area imaged each /me
•  Every 11 / 12 / 24 / 35 days (depending
on satellite)
•  Only pixels which are coherent (low
noise) in all images are selected
•  Atmosphere may be filtered out from a
stack of > 20 images
•  Geode/c network adjustment
	
Using a large stack of SAR images
Challenge the future
When would you use InSAR?
•  Over land? Water?
•  Urban areas? Rural agricultural land?
•  Dry rocky areas? Vegetated areas?
•  Snow? Arc/c areas?
•  Millimetre or cen/metre level deforma/on between images?
Or metre level?
•  Would 2 SAR images over a desert be enough? What about
over Amsterdam? How does this relate to the /me-gap
between images?
Quiz
Some results
Province-wide monitoring
every week / month
red/yellow = subsidence, green = stable, blue = uplio
Oil & Gas produc=on:
Con=nuous monitoring of subsidence
Oil & Gas example
Oil & Gas example
A new image every 11 days
Processed and reported within 12 hours
Helps in decision-making
Oil & Gas example
~200 cm of subsidence over 7 years
Mining in Germany
Why the ‘holes’ in data
coverage?
The areas in Google Earth
Spot the differences!
3 x 3 m resolu/on | red/yellow = subsidence, green = stable
City-wide maps
RoWerdam, 4.5 million points
The image cannot be displayed. Your computer may not have enough memory to open the image, or the image may have been corrupted. Restart your computer, and then
open the file again. If the red x still appears, you may have to delete the image and then insert it again.
The image cannot be displayed. Your computer may not have enough memory to open the image, or the image may have been corrupted. Restart your computer, and
then open the file again. If the red x still appears, you may have to delete the image and then insert it again.
The image cannot be displayed. Your computer may not have enough memory to open the image, or the image may have been corrupted. Restart your computer, and
then open the file again. If the red x still appears, you may have to delete the image and then insert it again.
Post-processing
Pipeline risk assessment
to selec/on and smart
projec/on on the pipeline
network…
From spa/ally distributed
measurements…
to data presenta/on at
the address level.
Building inspec=on map
150x increase in density
wrt. conven=onal techniques
Now it’s your turn.
Interac=ve exercise
•  Go to <link to demo>
•  Choose your dataset:
–  Schiedam (‘ascending’ and ‘descending’ layers)
–  Delo (‘high’ and ‘low’ layers)
•  Click around!
In about 15 minutes, you should be able to answer some
ques/ons.
PS. The most ‘interes/ng’ observa/on about the data gets a prize!
Ques=ons
1.  How many SAR images were used in each case?
2.  How ooen did the satellite pass over Delo/Schiedam?
3.  Each ‘colored dot’ represents how much area?
4. In this example /me-series, give some
reasons of devia/on from the model.
Delo:
5. Are there major differences between high and low points? Why?
Schiedam:
6. Why would one need two satellite orbits? Isn’t one enough?
Horizontal – ver=cal decomposi=on
Image source: TRE
[t] +31 (0)15 820 0225
[e] info@skygeo.com
[w] www.skygeo.com
Contact us

DSD-INT 2015 - Workshop processing with sentinel toolbox - Jos Maccabiani, Sky Geo