Geodetically Accurate InSAR Data Processor for Time Series Analysis  Howard Zebker, Piyush Shanker, Cody Wortham, Scott Hensley Stanford University and Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Modern applications need better geodetic accuracy InSAR and time series methods (PS, SBAS) require precise SLC alignment from a variety of orbits Merging SAR data with other types needs geolocated and orthorectified products Processing many scenes (typically dozens) of one area needs to be efficient and on the desktop
Need for new processor Existing processing packages largely geodetically inaccurate Pixels placed at wrong place Lots of resampling to find offsets, and this is where many processors fail Now have precise orbits Multicore processors have untapped cycles we can use to speed up processing time
Approach Use precise orbits to find exact (~10 cm error) satellite position Choose a reference orbit for multiple scenes so images are nearly aligned – small offsets Reference orbit not physically realizable without constant acceleration, so it’s “virtual” Use motion compensation method to make spacecraft “fly” on chosen trajectory Be careful to keep geometrical info throughout
Definitions for orbital geometry Reference orbit Orbit track projected on reference sphere Coordinate origin at center of sphere with local Earth radius of curvature Point to be imaged Instantaneous squint angle
Remember the basics Phase and range  relations Doppler relations
Focus and position equations in our geometry
SCH coordinate system r c  – local radius of curvature, not Earth radius s – along track distance on local sphere from reference point c – across-track distance on local sphere h – height above local sphere
Geometry for motion compensation distance and phase Actual satellite position Satellite position on reference orbit at same squint direction (Figure is projection of imaging geometry onto the reference sphere)
Finding the position on the reference orbit for an actual spacecraft location
Motion compensation distance calculation Motion compensation baseline is difference between actual range r’ and reference orbit range r
Motion compensation algorithm Derivation of reference distance r: Mocomp distance and phase corrections:
Phase history for mocomped scatterer Compare phase histories for r act (t) and r(t)
Focus corrections Quadratic phase correction from processing at wrong distance: Frequency domain phase term from range-varying motion  compensation phase:
Topographic correction Processor computes SLCs assuming perfectly spherical Earth No easy closed form solution for position so use iterative method to find pixel location in 3-space Apply phase correction based on pixel elevation
Iterative topography correction Topographic phase correction:
Impulse response Impulse resolution: 5.3 m range, 4.0 m azimuth Figure for mocomp baseline of 1500 m (InSAR baseline 3km)
Single look complex image of SFO
Geodetic accuracy – Pinon Flat Corner Reflector Locations Latitude Longitude Latitude Longitude Measurement (deg) (deg) error (m) error (m)   Reflector aligned with ascending orbit   InSAR location, 33.61233 -116.4570 9 -18 unregistered  image InSAR location, 33.61215 -116.4567 -11 9 registered image   Ground GPS 33.61225 -116.4568 -- -- survey   Reflectors aligned with descending orbit   InSAR location, 33.61215 -116.4579 -11 0 unregistered  image InSAR location, 33.61213 -116.4577 -13 18 registered image Ground GPS 33.61225 -116.4579 -- -- Survey InSAR location, 33.60729 -116.4517 -9 9 unregistered  image InSAR location, 33.60727 -116.4516 -11 18 registered image Ground GPS 33.60737 -116.4518 -- -- survey
Geodetic accuracy – Image offsets from SRTM DEM Range offset Azimuth offset Additional stretch Scene at center (m) at center (m) Range (m) Azimuth (m)   Ventura -15.8 18.2 9.4 15.2   Hawaii -21.5 24.0 14.1 25.4   Iceland 2.0 2.9 44.0 29.4
Ventura, CA – Atmospheric phases
Hawaii – deformation plus atmosphere
Iceland – significant ionospheric artifact
Correlation images Ventura Hawaii Iceland
Computational efficiency Implemented on multicore desktop using F90 and Python scripting Computational modules parallelized with OpenMP Typical ALOS interferogram ~2-4 minutes Working with JPL to produce a package to be distributed to community At present we use a standalone version compiled under *nix
Summary InSAR and time series analysis requires precise image pixel locations Imprecise locations make processing slow and unreliable With precise orbits, motion compensation, and particular geometry processor equations are fairly simple and efficient to compute Accuracies of 10 m easy to achieve, probably 1 m with further development

TH1.L09 - GEODETICALLY ACCURATE INSAR DATA PROCESSOR FOR TIME SERIES ANALYSIS

  • 1.
    Geodetically Accurate InSARData Processor for Time Series Analysis Howard Zebker, Piyush Shanker, Cody Wortham, Scott Hensley Stanford University and Jet Propulsion Laboratory
  • 2.
    Modern applications needbetter geodetic accuracy InSAR and time series methods (PS, SBAS) require precise SLC alignment from a variety of orbits Merging SAR data with other types needs geolocated and orthorectified products Processing many scenes (typically dozens) of one area needs to be efficient and on the desktop
  • 3.
    Need for newprocessor Existing processing packages largely geodetically inaccurate Pixels placed at wrong place Lots of resampling to find offsets, and this is where many processors fail Now have precise orbits Multicore processors have untapped cycles we can use to speed up processing time
  • 4.
    Approach Use preciseorbits to find exact (~10 cm error) satellite position Choose a reference orbit for multiple scenes so images are nearly aligned – small offsets Reference orbit not physically realizable without constant acceleration, so it’s “virtual” Use motion compensation method to make spacecraft “fly” on chosen trajectory Be careful to keep geometrical info throughout
  • 5.
    Definitions for orbitalgeometry Reference orbit Orbit track projected on reference sphere Coordinate origin at center of sphere with local Earth radius of curvature Point to be imaged Instantaneous squint angle
  • 6.
    Remember the basicsPhase and range relations Doppler relations
  • 7.
    Focus and positionequations in our geometry
  • 8.
    SCH coordinate systemr c – local radius of curvature, not Earth radius s – along track distance on local sphere from reference point c – across-track distance on local sphere h – height above local sphere
  • 9.
    Geometry for motioncompensation distance and phase Actual satellite position Satellite position on reference orbit at same squint direction (Figure is projection of imaging geometry onto the reference sphere)
  • 10.
    Finding the positionon the reference orbit for an actual spacecraft location
  • 11.
    Motion compensation distancecalculation Motion compensation baseline is difference between actual range r’ and reference orbit range r
  • 12.
    Motion compensation algorithmDerivation of reference distance r: Mocomp distance and phase corrections:
  • 13.
    Phase history formocomped scatterer Compare phase histories for r act (t) and r(t)
  • 14.
    Focus corrections Quadraticphase correction from processing at wrong distance: Frequency domain phase term from range-varying motion compensation phase:
  • 15.
    Topographic correction Processorcomputes SLCs assuming perfectly spherical Earth No easy closed form solution for position so use iterative method to find pixel location in 3-space Apply phase correction based on pixel elevation
  • 16.
    Iterative topography correctionTopographic phase correction:
  • 17.
    Impulse response Impulseresolution: 5.3 m range, 4.0 m azimuth Figure for mocomp baseline of 1500 m (InSAR baseline 3km)
  • 18.
    Single look compleximage of SFO
  • 19.
    Geodetic accuracy –Pinon Flat Corner Reflector Locations Latitude Longitude Latitude Longitude Measurement (deg) (deg) error (m) error (m)   Reflector aligned with ascending orbit   InSAR location, 33.61233 -116.4570 9 -18 unregistered image InSAR location, 33.61215 -116.4567 -11 9 registered image   Ground GPS 33.61225 -116.4568 -- -- survey   Reflectors aligned with descending orbit   InSAR location, 33.61215 -116.4579 -11 0 unregistered image InSAR location, 33.61213 -116.4577 -13 18 registered image Ground GPS 33.61225 -116.4579 -- -- Survey InSAR location, 33.60729 -116.4517 -9 9 unregistered image InSAR location, 33.60727 -116.4516 -11 18 registered image Ground GPS 33.60737 -116.4518 -- -- survey
  • 20.
    Geodetic accuracy –Image offsets from SRTM DEM Range offset Azimuth offset Additional stretch Scene at center (m) at center (m) Range (m) Azimuth (m)   Ventura -15.8 18.2 9.4 15.2   Hawaii -21.5 24.0 14.1 25.4   Iceland 2.0 2.9 44.0 29.4
  • 21.
    Ventura, CA –Atmospheric phases
  • 22.
    Hawaii – deformationplus atmosphere
  • 23.
    Iceland – significantionospheric artifact
  • 24.
  • 25.
    Computational efficiency Implementedon multicore desktop using F90 and Python scripting Computational modules parallelized with OpenMP Typical ALOS interferogram ~2-4 minutes Working with JPL to produce a package to be distributed to community At present we use a standalone version compiled under *nix
  • 26.
    Summary InSAR andtime series analysis requires precise image pixel locations Imprecise locations make processing slow and unreliable With precise orbits, motion compensation, and particular geometry processor equations are fairly simple and efficient to compute Accuracies of 10 m easy to achieve, probably 1 m with further development