SlideShare a Scribd company logo
SCT screening programme standards
2
Standard 1: Coverage
Rationale To provide assurance that screening is offered to all eligible women and each
woman accepting screening has a screening result.
Timely information on screening coverage is important to identify trends and
monitor the effectiveness of service improvements.
Coverage is a measure of the delivery of screening to an eligible population. Low
coverage might indicate that:
• not all eligible women were offered screening
• those offered screening are not accepting the test
• those accepting the test are not being tested
Objective To maximise the impact of the screening programme in the eligible population
Criteria The proportion of pregnant women eligible for screening who are tested
Definitions Numerator: ‘tested women’ is the total number of ‘eligible women’ for whom a
screening result is reported; including
 known at risk couples referred directly for prenatal diagnosis (PND); repeat
testing must not delay referral
Denominator: ‘eligible women’ is the total number of pregnant women booked for
antenatal care during the reporting period, or presenting in labour without
previously having booked for antenatal care, excluding:
 women who miscarry between booking and testing
 women who opt for termination between booking and testing
 women who transfer out between booking and testing, i.e. do not have a result
 women who transfer in who have a result from a screening test performed
elsewhere in this pregnancy
Threshold Acceptable level: ≥ 95.0%
Achievable level: ≥ 99.0%
Mitigations/qualifications Requires matched cohort data
Direct referral to PND in known at risk couples must not be delayed due to new
guidelines to offer screening in every pregnancy
Reporting Reporting focus: maternity service
Data source: maternity service
Responsible for submission: maternity service
Reporting period: quarterly; data to be collated between 2 and 3 months after each
quarter end.
Deadlines: 30 September (Q1), 31 December (Q2), 31 March (Q3), 30 June (Q4)
SCT screening programme standards
3
Standard 2: Timeliness of antenatal
screening test
Rationale To identify carrier and affected women by 10 weeks +0 days to allow the baby's
biological father to be offered testing and to offer PND to at risk couples by 12
weeks + 0 days of pregnancy
Objective To maximise the opportunity for informed choice
Criteria Proportion of samples tested by 10 weeks + 0 days gestation
Definitions Numerator ‘women tested by 10 weeks + 0 days gestation’ is the total number of
pregnant women for whom a sample was received in the laboratory and for whom
an antenatal sickle cell and thalassaemia screening result was reported by 10 weeks
+ 0 days gestation (≤70 days)
Denominator ‘women for whom sample received at laboratory’ is the total number
of pregnant women for whom an antenatal sickle cell and thalassaemia screening
sample was received at the laboratory
Calculation of gestational age, may be based on last menstrual period or ultrasound
scan
Threshold Acceptable level ≥ 50.0%
Achievable level ≥75.0%
Mitigations/qualifications Does not need to be matched cohort
Reporting Reporting focus: maternity service
Data source: antenatal screening laboratory
Responsible for submission: maternity service
Reporting period: quarterly; data to be collated between 2 and 3 months after each
quarter end
Deadlines: 30 September (Q1), 31 December (Q2), 31 March (Q3), 30 June (Q4)
SCT screening programme standards
4
Standard 3: Completion of family origin
questionnaire (FOQ)
Rationale To interpret screening results in high prevalence areas and to identify women at
higher risk to be offered further testing in low prevalence areas
Objective To maximise accuracy of screening test
Criteria Proportion of samples that arrive in the laboratory accompanied by a completed
FOQ
Definitions Numerator ‘number of antenatal samples received in the laboratory with completed
FOQ’
Denominator ‘number of antenatal samples’ received by the laboratory
A completed FOQ must use the national template (paper or electronic format), and
must include:
 at least one box for the mother or options for ‘declined to answer’ or ‘don’t
know’ selected
 at least one box for the father or options for ‘declined to answer’ or ‘don’t
know’ selected
 gestational age or gestational age ‘not known’ recorded
Threshold Acceptable level: ≥ 95.0%
Achievable level: ≥ 99.0%
Mitigations/qualifications Does not need to be matched cohort
Reporting Reporting focus: maternity service
Data source: antenatal screening laboratory
Responsible for submission: maternity service
Reporting period: quarterly; data to be collated between 2 and 3 months after each
quarter end
Deadlines: 30 September (Q1), 31 December (Q2), 31 March (Q3), 30 June (Q4)
Consultation: draft standards for Sickle cell and thalassaemia (SCT) screening programme standards 2016/2017
5
Standard 4: Antenatal screening test
turnaround times
Rationale To report results promptly to help to achieve the offer of PND by 12+0 weeks
gestation
Objective To maximise the opportunity for informed choice
Criteria Proportion of samples reported within 3 working days
Definitions Numerator: number of antenatal results reported ≤ 3 working days of receipt of
sample in the laboratory
 count receipt of sample as day 1 when it is received in the specimen
reception in the first laboratory
 an interim report counts if there is likely to be a delay in producing a final
report e.g. recommending the baby’s father testing
 include samples that cannot be processed due to poor sample quality or
incomplete FOQ
Denominator: number of antenatal samples received in the laboratory
Threshold Acceptable ≥ 90.0%
Achievable ≥ 95.0%
Mitigations/qualifications
Reporting Reporting focus: antenatal screening laboratory
Data source: antenatal screening laboratory
Responsible for submission: antenatal screening laboratory
Reporting period: annually for samples received in the laboratory in the previous
financial year
Deadline: 30th June
Consultation: draft standards for Sickle cell and thalassaemia (SCT) screening programme standards 2016/2017
6
Standard 5: Timely counselling and offer of
prenatal diagnosis (PND) to couples at risk
of having an affected infant
Rationale To facilitate uptake of PND, couples must be screened and counselled early in
pregnancy.
Approximately half of at risk couples decline PND; people may be declining PND
because the offer is made late in the pregnancy
Objective To maximise the opportunity for parents at risk of having an affected infant to make
informed and timely reproductive choices
Criteria Proportion of at risk couples offered PND by 12 weeks +0 days gestation
Definitions Numerator: Number of at risk couples who attend counselling and are offered PND
for sickle cell disease or thalassaemia by 12+0 weeks gestation
Denominator: Number of at risk couples who attend counselling and are offered
PND for sickle cell disease or thalassaemia
Calculation of gestational age may be based on last menstrual period or ultrasound
scan
Exclusions: At risk women without baby’s biological father result must still be
offered PND but data on these women is not part of this standard
Threshold Acceptable ≥50.0%
Achievable ≥75.0%
Mitigations/qualifications
Reporting Reporting focus: maternity service
Data source: maternity service
Responsible for submission: maternity service
Reporting period: annually for women tested in the previous financial year
Deadline: 30th June
Equity impact Women who are at risk of having an affected child and cannot arrange a sample
from the baby’s biological father must still be offered PND but data will not be
requested on these women. The same standard must apply but identifying the
denominator is complex and the impact on data providers considered to be too
great.
The expectation is that at risk women without baby’s biological father result can be
offered PND sooner and that this standard will be a surrogate marker for all.
Consultation: draft standards for Sickle cell and thalassaemia (SCT) screening programme standards 2016/2017
7
Standard 6: Timeliness of prenatal
diagnosis (PND)
Rationale There is a known association between gestation at PND offer and uptake, with the
early offer being associated with greater uptake of PND. Advanced gestational age
may limit reproductive choices.
Objective To facilitate timely intervention and choice in procedure for those who accept PND
Criteria Proportion of PND tests performed by 12 weeks + 6 days
Definitions Numerator: number of pregnant women who have PND for sickle cell disease or
thalassaemia by 12+6 weeks gestation
Denominator: number of pregnant women who have PND for sickle cell disease or
thalassaemia
Includes:
 at risk couples
 women who are carriers of clinically significant haemoglobin variants or
thalassaemia who opt for PND testing and do not have baby’s biological
father’s result
 women having PND for other reasons who are also identified as being at risk
of having a fetus affected by sickle cell disease or significant thalassaemia
and who consent to additional testing
 women who had assisted conception whose partners are carriers of a
clinically significant haemoglobin variant or thalassaemia
Calculation of gestational age may be based on last menstrual period or ultrasound
scan
Threshold Acceptable level ≥ 50.0%
Achievable level ≥75.0%
Mitigations/qualifications
Reporting Reporting focus: maternity service
Data source: PND laboratory
Responsible for submission: PND laboratory
Reporting period: annually for women tested in the previous financial year
Deadline: 30th October
Consultation: draft standards for Sickle cell and thalassaemia (SCT) screening programme standards 2016/2017
8
Standard 7: Timely reporting of prenatal
diagnosis results to parents
Rationale To provide parents with information about living with and supporting an affected
child; to prepare parents for their baby’s newborn screening result; or to ensure
timely referral for termination of pregnancy
Objective Maximising informed reproductive choice
Criteria Proportion of women/couples receiving results and counselling within 5 working
days of PND procedure
Definitions Numerator: number of women/couples at risk of having a fetus affected by sickle
cell disease or thalassaemia who are informed and counselled regarding the result ≤
5 working days of prenatal diagnostic test
Denominator: number of women/couples at risk of having a fetus affected by sickle
cell disease or thalassaemia who are informed and counselled regarding the result
following prenatal diagnostic test
Threshold Acceptable level ≥70.0%
Achievable level ≥90.0%
Mitigations/qualifications
Reporting Reporting focus: maternity service
Data source: maternity service
Responsible for submission: maternity service
Reporting period: annually for women tested in the previous financial year
Deadline: 30th June
Consultation: draft standards for Sickle cell and thalassaemia (SCT) screening programme standards 2016/2017
9
Standard 8: Accuracy of the newborn
screening test
Rationale To ensure the efficacy of the screening programme the test should have certain
levels of specificity and sensitivity. It is therefore, important to monitor the accuracy
of the test
Objective To identify, with specified sensitivity babies born with conditions where early
intervention is likely to be beneficial
Criteria Proportion of diagnostic results that are consistent with screen positive result
Definitions Numerator: number of babies with a diagnostic result that is consistent with the
screen positive results Hb-FS, Hb-FSC and other specified conditions
Denominator: number of babies with screen positive results Hb-FS, Hb-FSC and
other specified conditions
Specified conditions to be detected in newborn screening: HbSS, HbSC, HbS/β
thalassaemia (S/β+, S/β°, HbS/β, HbS/γβ, Lepore), HbS DPunjab, HbS/E, HbS
OArab, HbS/HPFH
Exclusions:
other clinically significant haemoglobinopathies likely to be detected as by-products
of newborn screening including β thalassaemia major, Hb E/β thalassaemia and β
thalassaemia intermedia
Sickle cell carriers and carriers of Hb C, Hb D, Hb,E, and Hb OArab
Threshold Acceptable standard ≥99.0% accuracy for specified conditions
Achievable standard: ≥99.5% accuracy for specified conditions
Mitigations/qualifications False negatives (specificity) data collected by the newborn outcome project suggests
that it is rare for infants to present clinically with Hb-SS, Hb-SC and other specified
conditions with a screen negative result (false negative)
Reporting Reporting focus: NBS laboratory
Data source: newborn outcomes project
Responsible for submission: newborn outcomes project
Reporting period: annually for samples received in the laboratory in the previous
financial year
Deadline: 31st July tbd
Consultation: draft standards for Sickle cell and thalassaemia (SCT) screening programme standards 2016/2017
10
Standard 9: Timely reporting of screen
positive results to parents
Rationale To provide timely results to parents and ensure safe transition from screening into
care and to confirm diagnosis. This includes providing parents with information
about the screening result, living with and supporting an affected child, and the care
pathway.
Objective To optimise individual and population health outcomes in babies born with
conditions where early intervention is likely to be beneficial
Criteria Proportion of infants seen by a healthcare professional within 28 days of age
Definitions Numerator: number of infants with screen positive result seen by a healthcare
professional ≤ 28 days of age
Denominator: number of infants with screen positive result
Specified conditions to be detected in newborn screening: HbSS, HbSC, HbS/β
thalassaemia (S/β+, S/β°, HbS/β, HbS/γβ, Lepore), HbS/DPunjab, HbS/E,
HbS/OArab, HbS/HPFH, Hb S with any other variant and no Hb A, and other clinically
significant Haemoglobinopathies likely to be detected as by-products of newborn
screening including β thalassaemia major, Hb E/β thalassaemia, and β thalassaemia
intermedia
Threshold Acceptable standard ≥ 90.0 %
Achievable standard: ≥95.0%
Mitigations/qualifications
Reporting Reporting focus: newborn screening laboratory
Data source: newborn screening laboratory
Responsible for submission: newborn screening laboratory
Reporting period: annually for infants born in the previous financial year
Deadline: 31st July
Consultation: draft standards for Sickle cell and thalassaemia (SCT) screening programme standards 2016/2017
11
Standard 10 Timely receipt into Specialist
Haemoglobinopathy Centres (SHC)
Rationale To ensure timely and appropriate management, infants with positive screening
results must attend a SHC by 90 days of age. SHCs have a lead responsibility for the
care of all patients with sickle cell disease and significant thalassaemia in their
geographical region.
Objective To optimise individual and population health outcomes in babies born with
conditions where early intervention is likely to be beneficial
Criteria Proportion of infants with a positive screening result followed up and entered into
care within 90 days of age
Definitions Numerator: number of infants with screen positive result seen at a SHC ≤ 90 days of
age
Denominator: number of infants with screen positive result seen at SHC
Screen positive results: specified conditions to be detected in newborn screening:
HbSS, HbSC, HbS/β thalassaemia (S/β+, S/β°, HbS/β, HbS/γβ, Lepore),
HbS/DPunjab, HbS/E, HbS/OArab, HbS/HPFH, Hb S with any other variant and no Hb
A, and other clinically significant Haemoglobinopathies likely to be detected as by-
products of newborn screening including β thalassaemia major, Hb E/β thalassaemia
and β thalassaemia intermedia.
Inclusions: SHC may include a local centre working as part of a network
Effective timeframe: It is generally accepted that penicillin prophylaxis should start
by 3 months of age in children with sickle cell disease, infants with significant
thalassaemia do not require penicillin prophylaxis but are still expected to attend a
SHC by 90 days of age
Threshold Acceptable standard ≥ 90.0%
Achievable standard: ≥95.0%
Mitigations/qualifications
Reporting Reporting focus: SHC geographical area of responsibility
Data source: newborn outcomes project
Responsible for submission: newborn outcomes project
Reporting period: annually for infants born in the previous financial year
Deadline: 31st July

More Related Content

Similar to Draft sct screening programme standards publication v0.6

Unit 3 counseling for pmtct
Unit 3 counseling for pmtctUnit 3 counseling for pmtct
Unit 3 counseling for pmtctDavid Ngogoyo
 
Screening in biomedical sciences ‫‬
Screening in biomedical sciences ‫‬Screening in biomedical sciences ‫‬
Screening in biomedical sciences ‫‬Dr Abbas Assayed
 
Use of evidence based practices to improve survival - edited.pptx
Use of evidence based practices to improve survival - edited.pptxUse of evidence based practices to improve survival - edited.pptx
Use of evidence based practices to improve survival - edited.pptxDr Tete
 
Evidence based population health screening
Evidence based population health screeningEvidence based population health screening
Evidence based population health screeningmeducationdotnet
 
2016 indicator reference guide Prevention Services
2016 indicator reference guide Prevention Services2016 indicator reference guide Prevention Services
2016 indicator reference guide Prevention Services#GOMOJO, INC.
 
clm for HO Student (1).pptx wggrhhgfyuddu
clm for HO Student (1).pptx wggrhhgfyudduclm for HO Student (1).pptx wggrhhgfyuddu
clm for HO Student (1).pptx wggrhhgfyudduMoviePics
 
Routine HIV Testing in the Community Health Center
Routine HIV Testing in the Community Health CenterRoutine HIV Testing in the Community Health Center
Routine HIV Testing in the Community Health CenterMPCA
 
EVALUATE VACCINATION COVERAGE - NIS MOHFW.ppt
EVALUATE VACCINATION COVERAGE - NIS MOHFW.pptEVALUATE VACCINATION COVERAGE - NIS MOHFW.ppt
EVALUATE VACCINATION COVERAGE - NIS MOHFW.pptMalateshUndi2
 
C04 P02 CRITERIA FOR SCREENING TESTS.ppt
C04 P02 CRITERIA FOR SCREENING TESTS.pptC04 P02 CRITERIA FOR SCREENING TESTS.ppt
C04 P02 CRITERIA FOR SCREENING TESTS.pptsanakhader3
 
screening and diagnostic methods SSS.pptx
screening and diagnostic methods SSS.pptxscreening and diagnostic methods SSS.pptx
screening and diagnostic methods SSS.pptxLeHaRe
 
unit 1. Introduction to CLM.pptx
unit  1. Introduction to CLM.pptxunit  1. Introduction to CLM.pptx
unit 1. Introduction to CLM.pptxreshadnuredin1
 
Diagnostic Testing Conference 2020
Diagnostic Testing Conference 2020Diagnostic Testing Conference 2020
Diagnostic Testing Conference 20204 All of Us
 

Similar to Draft sct screening programme standards publication v0.6 (20)

Unit 3 counseling for pmtct
Unit 3 counseling for pmtctUnit 3 counseling for pmtct
Unit 3 counseling for pmtct
 
Screening in biomedical sciences ‫‬
Screening in biomedical sciences ‫‬Screening in biomedical sciences ‫‬
Screening in biomedical sciences ‫‬
 
The Generation study by Alice Tuff-Lacey
The Generation study by Alice Tuff-LaceyThe Generation study by Alice Tuff-Lacey
The Generation study by Alice Tuff-Lacey
 
Use of evidence based practices to improve survival - edited.pptx
Use of evidence based practices to improve survival - edited.pptxUse of evidence based practices to improve survival - edited.pptx
Use of evidence based practices to improve survival - edited.pptx
 
Nipt pcg
Nipt pcgNipt pcg
Nipt pcg
 
Evidence based population health screening
Evidence based population health screeningEvidence based population health screening
Evidence based population health screening
 
2016 indicator reference guide Prevention Services
2016 indicator reference guide Prevention Services2016 indicator reference guide Prevention Services
2016 indicator reference guide Prevention Services
 
clm for HO Student (1).pptx wggrhhgfyuddu
clm for HO Student (1).pptx wggrhhgfyudduclm for HO Student (1).pptx wggrhhgfyuddu
clm for HO Student (1).pptx wggrhhgfyuddu
 
Screening kaleab
Screening  kaleabScreening  kaleab
Screening kaleab
 
Routine HIV Testing in the Community Health Center
Routine HIV Testing in the Community Health CenterRoutine HIV Testing in the Community Health Center
Routine HIV Testing in the Community Health Center
 
UOG Journal Club: Second-trimester uterine artery Doppler in risk for pre-ecl...
UOG Journal Club: Second-trimester uterine artery Doppler in risk for pre-ecl...UOG Journal Club: Second-trimester uterine artery Doppler in risk for pre-ecl...
UOG Journal Club: Second-trimester uterine artery Doppler in risk for pre-ecl...
 
Recruitment in cancer trials
Recruitment in cancer trials Recruitment in cancer trials
Recruitment in cancer trials
 
EVALUATE VACCINATION COVERAGE - NIS MOHFW.ppt
EVALUATE VACCINATION COVERAGE - NIS MOHFW.pptEVALUATE VACCINATION COVERAGE - NIS MOHFW.ppt
EVALUATE VACCINATION COVERAGE - NIS MOHFW.ppt
 
C04 P02 CRITERIA FOR SCREENING TESTS.ppt
C04 P02 CRITERIA FOR SCREENING TESTS.pptC04 P02 CRITERIA FOR SCREENING TESTS.ppt
C04 P02 CRITERIA FOR SCREENING TESTS.ppt
 
screening and diagnostic methods SSS.pptx
screening and diagnostic methods SSS.pptxscreening and diagnostic methods SSS.pptx
screening and diagnostic methods SSS.pptx
 
Screening of diseases
Screening of diseasesScreening of diseases
Screening of diseases
 
screening.pptx
screening.pptxscreening.pptx
screening.pptx
 
UOG Journal Club: Ability of a preterm surveillance clinic to triage risk of ...
UOG Journal Club: Ability of a preterm surveillance clinic to triage risk of ...UOG Journal Club: Ability of a preterm surveillance clinic to triage risk of ...
UOG Journal Club: Ability of a preterm surveillance clinic to triage risk of ...
 
unit 1. Introduction to CLM.pptx
unit  1. Introduction to CLM.pptxunit  1. Introduction to CLM.pptx
unit 1. Introduction to CLM.pptx
 
Diagnostic Testing Conference 2020
Diagnostic Testing Conference 2020Diagnostic Testing Conference 2020
Diagnostic Testing Conference 2020
 

More from PHEScreening

NHS screening leaflet short urls and qr codes PDF
NHS screening leaflet short urls and qr codes PDFNHS screening leaflet short urls and qr codes PDF
NHS screening leaflet short urls and qr codes PDFPHEScreening
 
NHS screening leaflet short urls and qr codes
NHS screening leaflet short urls and qr codesNHS screening leaflet short urls and qr codes
NHS screening leaflet short urls and qr codesPHEScreening
 
PHE screening inequalities conference final slides
PHE screening inequalities conference final slidesPHE screening inequalities conference final slides
PHE screening inequalities conference final slidesPHEScreening
 
AAA screening nurses inequalities presentation final
AAA screening nurses inequalities presentation finalAAA screening nurses inequalities presentation final
AAA screening nurses inequalities presentation finalPHEScreening
 
AAA screening technicians inequalities presentation final
AAA screening technicians inequalities presentation finalAAA screening technicians inequalities presentation final
AAA screening technicians inequalities presentation finalPHEScreening
 
AAA Technicians - Screening Inequalities
AAA Technicians - Screening InequalitiesAAA Technicians - Screening Inequalities
AAA Technicians - Screening InequalitiesPHEScreening
 
AAA Nurses - Screening Inequalities
AAA Nurses - Screening InequalitiesAAA Nurses - Screening Inequalities
AAA Nurses - Screening InequalitiesPHEScreening
 
AAA Screening : Extending the screener role
AAA Screening : Extending the screener roleAAA Screening : Extending the screener role
AAA Screening : Extending the screener rolePHEScreening
 
AAA Screening : Extending the screener role for nurses
AAA Screening : Extending the screener role for nursesAAA Screening : Extending the screener role for nurses
AAA Screening : Extending the screener role for nursesPHEScreening
 
AAA screening national programme update September 2019: Lisa Summers
AAA screening national programme update September 2019: Lisa SummersAAA screening national programme update September 2019: Lisa Summers
AAA screening national programme update September 2019: Lisa SummersPHEScreening
 
Improving outcomes of patients on AAA surveillance Adam Haque
Improving outcomes of patients on AAA surveillance Adam HaqueImproving outcomes of patients on AAA surveillance Adam Haque
Improving outcomes of patients on AAA surveillance Adam HaquePHEScreening
 
AAA nurses training: programme boards presentation September 2019
AAA nurses training: programme boards presentation September 2019AAA nurses training: programme boards presentation September 2019
AAA nurses training: programme boards presentation September 2019PHEScreening
 
AAA screeners LGBT awareness training September 2019
AAA screeners LGBT awareness training September 2019AAA screeners LGBT awareness training September 2019
AAA screeners LGBT awareness training September 2019PHEScreening
 
Digital screening information event 2 October 2019
Digital screening information event 2 October 2019Digital screening information event 2 October 2019
Digital screening information event 2 October 2019PHEScreening
 
NHS Breast Screening Programme & Association of Breast Surgery Audit
NHS Breast Screening Programme & Association of Breast Surgery  AuditNHS Breast Screening Programme & Association of Breast Surgery  Audit
NHS Breast Screening Programme & Association of Breast Surgery AuditPHEScreening
 
IDPS programme update Sharon Webb
IDPS programme update Sharon WebbIDPS programme update Sharon Webb
IDPS programme update Sharon WebbPHEScreening
 
10. Siobhan O'callaghan findings from QA activities
10. Siobhan O'callaghan findings from QA activities10. Siobhan O'callaghan findings from QA activities
10. Siobhan O'callaghan findings from QA activitiesPHEScreening
 
9. Judith Timms HIV screening incidents
9. Judith Timms HIV screening incidents9. Judith Timms HIV screening incidents
9. Judith Timms HIV screening incidentsPHEScreening
 
8. Nadia Permalloo learning from incidents
8. Nadia Permalloo learning from incidents8. Nadia Permalloo learning from incidents
8. Nadia Permalloo learning from incidentsPHEScreening
 
7. Tom Lewis Getting it right for pathology presentation
7. Tom Lewis Getting it right for pathology presentation7. Tom Lewis Getting it right for pathology presentation
7. Tom Lewis Getting it right for pathology presentationPHEScreening
 

More from PHEScreening (20)

NHS screening leaflet short urls and qr codes PDF
NHS screening leaflet short urls and qr codes PDFNHS screening leaflet short urls and qr codes PDF
NHS screening leaflet short urls and qr codes PDF
 
NHS screening leaflet short urls and qr codes
NHS screening leaflet short urls and qr codesNHS screening leaflet short urls and qr codes
NHS screening leaflet short urls and qr codes
 
PHE screening inequalities conference final slides
PHE screening inequalities conference final slidesPHE screening inequalities conference final slides
PHE screening inequalities conference final slides
 
AAA screening nurses inequalities presentation final
AAA screening nurses inequalities presentation finalAAA screening nurses inequalities presentation final
AAA screening nurses inequalities presentation final
 
AAA screening technicians inequalities presentation final
AAA screening technicians inequalities presentation finalAAA screening technicians inequalities presentation final
AAA screening technicians inequalities presentation final
 
AAA Technicians - Screening Inequalities
AAA Technicians - Screening InequalitiesAAA Technicians - Screening Inequalities
AAA Technicians - Screening Inequalities
 
AAA Nurses - Screening Inequalities
AAA Nurses - Screening InequalitiesAAA Nurses - Screening Inequalities
AAA Nurses - Screening Inequalities
 
AAA Screening : Extending the screener role
AAA Screening : Extending the screener roleAAA Screening : Extending the screener role
AAA Screening : Extending the screener role
 
AAA Screening : Extending the screener role for nurses
AAA Screening : Extending the screener role for nursesAAA Screening : Extending the screener role for nurses
AAA Screening : Extending the screener role for nurses
 
AAA screening national programme update September 2019: Lisa Summers
AAA screening national programme update September 2019: Lisa SummersAAA screening national programme update September 2019: Lisa Summers
AAA screening national programme update September 2019: Lisa Summers
 
Improving outcomes of patients on AAA surveillance Adam Haque
Improving outcomes of patients on AAA surveillance Adam HaqueImproving outcomes of patients on AAA surveillance Adam Haque
Improving outcomes of patients on AAA surveillance Adam Haque
 
AAA nurses training: programme boards presentation September 2019
AAA nurses training: programme boards presentation September 2019AAA nurses training: programme boards presentation September 2019
AAA nurses training: programme boards presentation September 2019
 
AAA screeners LGBT awareness training September 2019
AAA screeners LGBT awareness training September 2019AAA screeners LGBT awareness training September 2019
AAA screeners LGBT awareness training September 2019
 
Digital screening information event 2 October 2019
Digital screening information event 2 October 2019Digital screening information event 2 October 2019
Digital screening information event 2 October 2019
 
NHS Breast Screening Programme & Association of Breast Surgery Audit
NHS Breast Screening Programme & Association of Breast Surgery  AuditNHS Breast Screening Programme & Association of Breast Surgery  Audit
NHS Breast Screening Programme & Association of Breast Surgery Audit
 
IDPS programme update Sharon Webb
IDPS programme update Sharon WebbIDPS programme update Sharon Webb
IDPS programme update Sharon Webb
 
10. Siobhan O'callaghan findings from QA activities
10. Siobhan O'callaghan findings from QA activities10. Siobhan O'callaghan findings from QA activities
10. Siobhan O'callaghan findings from QA activities
 
9. Judith Timms HIV screening incidents
9. Judith Timms HIV screening incidents9. Judith Timms HIV screening incidents
9. Judith Timms HIV screening incidents
 
8. Nadia Permalloo learning from incidents
8. Nadia Permalloo learning from incidents8. Nadia Permalloo learning from incidents
8. Nadia Permalloo learning from incidents
 
7. Tom Lewis Getting it right for pathology presentation
7. Tom Lewis Getting it right for pathology presentation7. Tom Lewis Getting it right for pathology presentation
7. Tom Lewis Getting it right for pathology presentation
 

Recently uploaded

CHAPTER- 1 SEMESTER V NATIONAL-POLICIES-AND-LEGISLATION.pdf
CHAPTER- 1 SEMESTER V NATIONAL-POLICIES-AND-LEGISLATION.pdfCHAPTER- 1 SEMESTER V NATIONAL-POLICIES-AND-LEGISLATION.pdf
CHAPTER- 1 SEMESTER V NATIONAL-POLICIES-AND-LEGISLATION.pdfSachin Sharma
 
Cell structure slideshare.pptx Unlocking the Secrets of Cells: Structure, Fun...
Cell structure slideshare.pptx Unlocking the Secrets of Cells: Structure, Fun...Cell structure slideshare.pptx Unlocking the Secrets of Cells: Structure, Fun...
Cell structure slideshare.pptx Unlocking the Secrets of Cells: Structure, Fun...ananyagirishbabu1
 
QA Paediatric dentistry department, Hospital Melaka 2020
QA Paediatric dentistry department, Hospital Melaka 2020QA Paediatric dentistry department, Hospital Melaka 2020
QA Paediatric dentistry department, Hospital Melaka 2020Azreen Aj
 
Jaipur @ℂall @Girls ꧁❤8901183002❤꧂@ℂall @Girls Service Vip Top Model Safe
Jaipur @ℂall @Girls ꧁❤8901183002❤꧂@ℂall @Girls Service Vip Top Model SafeJaipur @ℂall @Girls ꧁❤8901183002❤꧂@ℂall @Girls Service Vip Top Model Safe
Jaipur @ℂall @Girls ꧁❤8901183002❤꧂@ℂall @Girls Service Vip Top Model Safeaunty1x1
 
ASSISTING WITH THE USE OF URINAL BY ANUSHRI SRIVASTAVA.pptx
ASSISTING WITH THE USE OF URINAL BY ANUSHRI SRIVASTAVA.pptxASSISTING WITH THE USE OF URINAL BY ANUSHRI SRIVASTAVA.pptx
ASSISTING WITH THE USE OF URINAL BY ANUSHRI SRIVASTAVA.pptxAnushriSrivastav
 
Overcome Your Phobias with Hypnotherapy.pptx
Overcome Your Phobias with Hypnotherapy.pptxOvercome Your Phobias with Hypnotherapy.pptx
Overcome Your Phobias with Hypnotherapy.pptxrenewlifehypnosis
 
Best Erectile Dysfunction Treatment In Narela
Best Erectile Dysfunction Treatment In NarelaBest Erectile Dysfunction Treatment In Narela
Best Erectile Dysfunction Treatment In NarelaLalClinic
 
Chris Shade BS MEd MS LPC-Associate "Presume" (What Do I Do?)
Chris Shade BS MEd MS LPC-Associate "Presume" (What Do I Do?)Chris Shade BS MEd MS LPC-Associate "Presume" (What Do I Do?)
Chris Shade BS MEd MS LPC-Associate "Presume" (What Do I Do?)Chris Shade
 
Deepfake Detection_Using Machine Learning .pptx
Deepfake Detection_Using Machine Learning .pptxDeepfake Detection_Using Machine Learning .pptx
Deepfake Detection_Using Machine Learning .pptxmahalsuraj389
 
💃Joint ❤89011-83002❤ #ℂALL #gIRLS Ludhiana Escorts by ✔️🍑💃Hotel #cALL #gIRLS...
💃Joint ❤89011-83002❤ #ℂALL #gIRLS Ludhiana Escorts  by ✔️🍑💃Hotel #cALL #gIRLS...💃Joint ❤89011-83002❤ #ℂALL #gIRLS Ludhiana Escorts  by ✔️🍑💃Hotel #cALL #gIRLS...
💃Joint ❤89011-83002❤ #ℂALL #gIRLS Ludhiana Escorts by ✔️🍑💃Hotel #cALL #gIRLS...aunty1x1
 
Call Girls in Jaipur (Rajasthan) call me [🔝89011-83002🔝] Escort In Jaipur ℂal...
Call Girls in Jaipur (Rajasthan) call me [🔝89011-83002🔝] Escort In Jaipur ℂal...Call Girls in Jaipur (Rajasthan) call me [🔝89011-83002🔝] Escort In Jaipur ℂal...
Call Girls in Jaipur (Rajasthan) call me [🔝89011-83002🔝] Escort In Jaipur ℂal...aunty1x1
 
Importance of Diet on Dental Health.docx
Importance of Diet on Dental Health.docxImportance of Diet on Dental Health.docx
Importance of Diet on Dental Health.docxSachin Mittal
 
BOWEL ELIMINATION BY ANUSHRI SRIVASTAVA.pptx
BOWEL ELIMINATION BY ANUSHRI SRIVASTAVA.pptxBOWEL ELIMINATION BY ANUSHRI SRIVASTAVA.pptx
BOWEL ELIMINATION BY ANUSHRI SRIVASTAVA.pptxAnushriSrivastav
 
VVIP Dehradun Girls 9719300533 Heat-bake { Dehradun } Genteel ℂall Serviℂe By...
VVIP Dehradun Girls 9719300533 Heat-bake { Dehradun } Genteel ℂall Serviℂe By...VVIP Dehradun Girls 9719300533 Heat-bake { Dehradun } Genteel ℂall Serviℂe By...
VVIP Dehradun Girls 9719300533 Heat-bake { Dehradun } Genteel ℂall Serviℂe By...rajkumar669520
 
Master the Art of Yoga with Joga Yoga Training
Master the Art of Yoga with Joga Yoga TrainingMaster the Art of Yoga with Joga Yoga Training
Master the Art of Yoga with Joga Yoga TrainingJoga Yoga Training
 
ASSISTING WITH THE USE OF BED PAN BY ANUSHRI SRIVASTAVA.pptx
ASSISTING WITH THE USE OF BED PAN BY ANUSHRI SRIVASTAVA.pptxASSISTING WITH THE USE OF BED PAN BY ANUSHRI SRIVASTAVA.pptx
ASSISTING WITH THE USE OF BED PAN BY ANUSHRI SRIVASTAVA.pptxAnushriSrivastav
 
Navigating Healthcare with Telemedicine
Navigating Healthcare with  TelemedicineNavigating Healthcare with  Telemedicine
Navigating Healthcare with TelemedicineIris Thiele Isip-Tan
 
The Docs PPG - 30.05.2024.pptx..........
The Docs PPG - 30.05.2024.pptx..........The Docs PPG - 30.05.2024.pptx..........
The Docs PPG - 30.05.2024.pptx..........TheDocs
 
Dehradun ❤CALL Girls 8901183002 ❤ℂall Girls IN Dehradun ESCORT SERVICE❤
Dehradun ❤CALL Girls  8901183002 ❤ℂall  Girls IN Dehradun ESCORT SERVICE❤Dehradun ❤CALL Girls  8901183002 ❤ℂall  Girls IN Dehradun ESCORT SERVICE❤
Dehradun ❤CALL Girls 8901183002 ❤ℂall Girls IN Dehradun ESCORT SERVICE❤aunty1x2
 
Healthcare Companion Robots: Key Features and Functionalities, Benefits, Chal...
Healthcare Companion Robots: Key Features and Functionalities, Benefits, Chal...Healthcare Companion Robots: Key Features and Functionalities, Benefits, Chal...
Healthcare Companion Robots: Key Features and Functionalities, Benefits, Chal...GQ Research
 

Recently uploaded (20)

CHAPTER- 1 SEMESTER V NATIONAL-POLICIES-AND-LEGISLATION.pdf
CHAPTER- 1 SEMESTER V NATIONAL-POLICIES-AND-LEGISLATION.pdfCHAPTER- 1 SEMESTER V NATIONAL-POLICIES-AND-LEGISLATION.pdf
CHAPTER- 1 SEMESTER V NATIONAL-POLICIES-AND-LEGISLATION.pdf
 
Cell structure slideshare.pptx Unlocking the Secrets of Cells: Structure, Fun...
Cell structure slideshare.pptx Unlocking the Secrets of Cells: Structure, Fun...Cell structure slideshare.pptx Unlocking the Secrets of Cells: Structure, Fun...
Cell structure slideshare.pptx Unlocking the Secrets of Cells: Structure, Fun...
 
QA Paediatric dentistry department, Hospital Melaka 2020
QA Paediatric dentistry department, Hospital Melaka 2020QA Paediatric dentistry department, Hospital Melaka 2020
QA Paediatric dentistry department, Hospital Melaka 2020
 
Jaipur @ℂall @Girls ꧁❤8901183002❤꧂@ℂall @Girls Service Vip Top Model Safe
Jaipur @ℂall @Girls ꧁❤8901183002❤꧂@ℂall @Girls Service Vip Top Model SafeJaipur @ℂall @Girls ꧁❤8901183002❤꧂@ℂall @Girls Service Vip Top Model Safe
Jaipur @ℂall @Girls ꧁❤8901183002❤꧂@ℂall @Girls Service Vip Top Model Safe
 
ASSISTING WITH THE USE OF URINAL BY ANUSHRI SRIVASTAVA.pptx
ASSISTING WITH THE USE OF URINAL BY ANUSHRI SRIVASTAVA.pptxASSISTING WITH THE USE OF URINAL BY ANUSHRI SRIVASTAVA.pptx
ASSISTING WITH THE USE OF URINAL BY ANUSHRI SRIVASTAVA.pptx
 
Overcome Your Phobias with Hypnotherapy.pptx
Overcome Your Phobias with Hypnotherapy.pptxOvercome Your Phobias with Hypnotherapy.pptx
Overcome Your Phobias with Hypnotherapy.pptx
 
Best Erectile Dysfunction Treatment In Narela
Best Erectile Dysfunction Treatment In NarelaBest Erectile Dysfunction Treatment In Narela
Best Erectile Dysfunction Treatment In Narela
 
Chris Shade BS MEd MS LPC-Associate "Presume" (What Do I Do?)
Chris Shade BS MEd MS LPC-Associate "Presume" (What Do I Do?)Chris Shade BS MEd MS LPC-Associate "Presume" (What Do I Do?)
Chris Shade BS MEd MS LPC-Associate "Presume" (What Do I Do?)
 
Deepfake Detection_Using Machine Learning .pptx
Deepfake Detection_Using Machine Learning .pptxDeepfake Detection_Using Machine Learning .pptx
Deepfake Detection_Using Machine Learning .pptx
 
💃Joint ❤89011-83002❤ #ℂALL #gIRLS Ludhiana Escorts by ✔️🍑💃Hotel #cALL #gIRLS...
💃Joint ❤89011-83002❤ #ℂALL #gIRLS Ludhiana Escorts  by ✔️🍑💃Hotel #cALL #gIRLS...💃Joint ❤89011-83002❤ #ℂALL #gIRLS Ludhiana Escorts  by ✔️🍑💃Hotel #cALL #gIRLS...
💃Joint ❤89011-83002❤ #ℂALL #gIRLS Ludhiana Escorts by ✔️🍑💃Hotel #cALL #gIRLS...
 
Call Girls in Jaipur (Rajasthan) call me [🔝89011-83002🔝] Escort In Jaipur ℂal...
Call Girls in Jaipur (Rajasthan) call me [🔝89011-83002🔝] Escort In Jaipur ℂal...Call Girls in Jaipur (Rajasthan) call me [🔝89011-83002🔝] Escort In Jaipur ℂal...
Call Girls in Jaipur (Rajasthan) call me [🔝89011-83002🔝] Escort In Jaipur ℂal...
 
Importance of Diet on Dental Health.docx
Importance of Diet on Dental Health.docxImportance of Diet on Dental Health.docx
Importance of Diet on Dental Health.docx
 
BOWEL ELIMINATION BY ANUSHRI SRIVASTAVA.pptx
BOWEL ELIMINATION BY ANUSHRI SRIVASTAVA.pptxBOWEL ELIMINATION BY ANUSHRI SRIVASTAVA.pptx
BOWEL ELIMINATION BY ANUSHRI SRIVASTAVA.pptx
 
VVIP Dehradun Girls 9719300533 Heat-bake { Dehradun } Genteel ℂall Serviℂe By...
VVIP Dehradun Girls 9719300533 Heat-bake { Dehradun } Genteel ℂall Serviℂe By...VVIP Dehradun Girls 9719300533 Heat-bake { Dehradun } Genteel ℂall Serviℂe By...
VVIP Dehradun Girls 9719300533 Heat-bake { Dehradun } Genteel ℂall Serviℂe By...
 
Master the Art of Yoga with Joga Yoga Training
Master the Art of Yoga with Joga Yoga TrainingMaster the Art of Yoga with Joga Yoga Training
Master the Art of Yoga with Joga Yoga Training
 
ASSISTING WITH THE USE OF BED PAN BY ANUSHRI SRIVASTAVA.pptx
ASSISTING WITH THE USE OF BED PAN BY ANUSHRI SRIVASTAVA.pptxASSISTING WITH THE USE OF BED PAN BY ANUSHRI SRIVASTAVA.pptx
ASSISTING WITH THE USE OF BED PAN BY ANUSHRI SRIVASTAVA.pptx
 
Navigating Healthcare with Telemedicine
Navigating Healthcare with  TelemedicineNavigating Healthcare with  Telemedicine
Navigating Healthcare with Telemedicine
 
The Docs PPG - 30.05.2024.pptx..........
The Docs PPG - 30.05.2024.pptx..........The Docs PPG - 30.05.2024.pptx..........
The Docs PPG - 30.05.2024.pptx..........
 
Dehradun ❤CALL Girls 8901183002 ❤ℂall Girls IN Dehradun ESCORT SERVICE❤
Dehradun ❤CALL Girls  8901183002 ❤ℂall  Girls IN Dehradun ESCORT SERVICE❤Dehradun ❤CALL Girls  8901183002 ❤ℂall  Girls IN Dehradun ESCORT SERVICE❤
Dehradun ❤CALL Girls 8901183002 ❤ℂall Girls IN Dehradun ESCORT SERVICE❤
 
Healthcare Companion Robots: Key Features and Functionalities, Benefits, Chal...
Healthcare Companion Robots: Key Features and Functionalities, Benefits, Chal...Healthcare Companion Robots: Key Features and Functionalities, Benefits, Chal...
Healthcare Companion Robots: Key Features and Functionalities, Benefits, Chal...
 

Draft sct screening programme standards publication v0.6

  • 1. SCT screening programme standards 2 Standard 1: Coverage Rationale To provide assurance that screening is offered to all eligible women and each woman accepting screening has a screening result. Timely information on screening coverage is important to identify trends and monitor the effectiveness of service improvements. Coverage is a measure of the delivery of screening to an eligible population. Low coverage might indicate that: • not all eligible women were offered screening • those offered screening are not accepting the test • those accepting the test are not being tested Objective To maximise the impact of the screening programme in the eligible population Criteria The proportion of pregnant women eligible for screening who are tested Definitions Numerator: ‘tested women’ is the total number of ‘eligible women’ for whom a screening result is reported; including  known at risk couples referred directly for prenatal diagnosis (PND); repeat testing must not delay referral Denominator: ‘eligible women’ is the total number of pregnant women booked for antenatal care during the reporting period, or presenting in labour without previously having booked for antenatal care, excluding:  women who miscarry between booking and testing  women who opt for termination between booking and testing  women who transfer out between booking and testing, i.e. do not have a result  women who transfer in who have a result from a screening test performed elsewhere in this pregnancy Threshold Acceptable level: ≥ 95.0% Achievable level: ≥ 99.0% Mitigations/qualifications Requires matched cohort data Direct referral to PND in known at risk couples must not be delayed due to new guidelines to offer screening in every pregnancy Reporting Reporting focus: maternity service Data source: maternity service Responsible for submission: maternity service Reporting period: quarterly; data to be collated between 2 and 3 months after each quarter end. Deadlines: 30 September (Q1), 31 December (Q2), 31 March (Q3), 30 June (Q4)
  • 2. SCT screening programme standards 3 Standard 2: Timeliness of antenatal screening test Rationale To identify carrier and affected women by 10 weeks +0 days to allow the baby's biological father to be offered testing and to offer PND to at risk couples by 12 weeks + 0 days of pregnancy Objective To maximise the opportunity for informed choice Criteria Proportion of samples tested by 10 weeks + 0 days gestation Definitions Numerator ‘women tested by 10 weeks + 0 days gestation’ is the total number of pregnant women for whom a sample was received in the laboratory and for whom an antenatal sickle cell and thalassaemia screening result was reported by 10 weeks + 0 days gestation (≤70 days) Denominator ‘women for whom sample received at laboratory’ is the total number of pregnant women for whom an antenatal sickle cell and thalassaemia screening sample was received at the laboratory Calculation of gestational age, may be based on last menstrual period or ultrasound scan Threshold Acceptable level ≥ 50.0% Achievable level ≥75.0% Mitigations/qualifications Does not need to be matched cohort Reporting Reporting focus: maternity service Data source: antenatal screening laboratory Responsible for submission: maternity service Reporting period: quarterly; data to be collated between 2 and 3 months after each quarter end Deadlines: 30 September (Q1), 31 December (Q2), 31 March (Q3), 30 June (Q4)
  • 3. SCT screening programme standards 4 Standard 3: Completion of family origin questionnaire (FOQ) Rationale To interpret screening results in high prevalence areas and to identify women at higher risk to be offered further testing in low prevalence areas Objective To maximise accuracy of screening test Criteria Proportion of samples that arrive in the laboratory accompanied by a completed FOQ Definitions Numerator ‘number of antenatal samples received in the laboratory with completed FOQ’ Denominator ‘number of antenatal samples’ received by the laboratory A completed FOQ must use the national template (paper or electronic format), and must include:  at least one box for the mother or options for ‘declined to answer’ or ‘don’t know’ selected  at least one box for the father or options for ‘declined to answer’ or ‘don’t know’ selected  gestational age or gestational age ‘not known’ recorded Threshold Acceptable level: ≥ 95.0% Achievable level: ≥ 99.0% Mitigations/qualifications Does not need to be matched cohort Reporting Reporting focus: maternity service Data source: antenatal screening laboratory Responsible for submission: maternity service Reporting period: quarterly; data to be collated between 2 and 3 months after each quarter end Deadlines: 30 September (Q1), 31 December (Q2), 31 March (Q3), 30 June (Q4)
  • 4. Consultation: draft standards for Sickle cell and thalassaemia (SCT) screening programme standards 2016/2017 5 Standard 4: Antenatal screening test turnaround times Rationale To report results promptly to help to achieve the offer of PND by 12+0 weeks gestation Objective To maximise the opportunity for informed choice Criteria Proportion of samples reported within 3 working days Definitions Numerator: number of antenatal results reported ≤ 3 working days of receipt of sample in the laboratory  count receipt of sample as day 1 when it is received in the specimen reception in the first laboratory  an interim report counts if there is likely to be a delay in producing a final report e.g. recommending the baby’s father testing  include samples that cannot be processed due to poor sample quality or incomplete FOQ Denominator: number of antenatal samples received in the laboratory Threshold Acceptable ≥ 90.0% Achievable ≥ 95.0% Mitigations/qualifications Reporting Reporting focus: antenatal screening laboratory Data source: antenatal screening laboratory Responsible for submission: antenatal screening laboratory Reporting period: annually for samples received in the laboratory in the previous financial year Deadline: 30th June
  • 5. Consultation: draft standards for Sickle cell and thalassaemia (SCT) screening programme standards 2016/2017 6 Standard 5: Timely counselling and offer of prenatal diagnosis (PND) to couples at risk of having an affected infant Rationale To facilitate uptake of PND, couples must be screened and counselled early in pregnancy. Approximately half of at risk couples decline PND; people may be declining PND because the offer is made late in the pregnancy Objective To maximise the opportunity for parents at risk of having an affected infant to make informed and timely reproductive choices Criteria Proportion of at risk couples offered PND by 12 weeks +0 days gestation Definitions Numerator: Number of at risk couples who attend counselling and are offered PND for sickle cell disease or thalassaemia by 12+0 weeks gestation Denominator: Number of at risk couples who attend counselling and are offered PND for sickle cell disease or thalassaemia Calculation of gestational age may be based on last menstrual period or ultrasound scan Exclusions: At risk women without baby’s biological father result must still be offered PND but data on these women is not part of this standard Threshold Acceptable ≥50.0% Achievable ≥75.0% Mitigations/qualifications Reporting Reporting focus: maternity service Data source: maternity service Responsible for submission: maternity service Reporting period: annually for women tested in the previous financial year Deadline: 30th June Equity impact Women who are at risk of having an affected child and cannot arrange a sample from the baby’s biological father must still be offered PND but data will not be requested on these women. The same standard must apply but identifying the denominator is complex and the impact on data providers considered to be too great. The expectation is that at risk women without baby’s biological father result can be offered PND sooner and that this standard will be a surrogate marker for all.
  • 6. Consultation: draft standards for Sickle cell and thalassaemia (SCT) screening programme standards 2016/2017 7 Standard 6: Timeliness of prenatal diagnosis (PND) Rationale There is a known association between gestation at PND offer and uptake, with the early offer being associated with greater uptake of PND. Advanced gestational age may limit reproductive choices. Objective To facilitate timely intervention and choice in procedure for those who accept PND Criteria Proportion of PND tests performed by 12 weeks + 6 days Definitions Numerator: number of pregnant women who have PND for sickle cell disease or thalassaemia by 12+6 weeks gestation Denominator: number of pregnant women who have PND for sickle cell disease or thalassaemia Includes:  at risk couples  women who are carriers of clinically significant haemoglobin variants or thalassaemia who opt for PND testing and do not have baby’s biological father’s result  women having PND for other reasons who are also identified as being at risk of having a fetus affected by sickle cell disease or significant thalassaemia and who consent to additional testing  women who had assisted conception whose partners are carriers of a clinically significant haemoglobin variant or thalassaemia Calculation of gestational age may be based on last menstrual period or ultrasound scan Threshold Acceptable level ≥ 50.0% Achievable level ≥75.0% Mitigations/qualifications Reporting Reporting focus: maternity service Data source: PND laboratory Responsible for submission: PND laboratory Reporting period: annually for women tested in the previous financial year Deadline: 30th October
  • 7. Consultation: draft standards for Sickle cell and thalassaemia (SCT) screening programme standards 2016/2017 8 Standard 7: Timely reporting of prenatal diagnosis results to parents Rationale To provide parents with information about living with and supporting an affected child; to prepare parents for their baby’s newborn screening result; or to ensure timely referral for termination of pregnancy Objective Maximising informed reproductive choice Criteria Proportion of women/couples receiving results and counselling within 5 working days of PND procedure Definitions Numerator: number of women/couples at risk of having a fetus affected by sickle cell disease or thalassaemia who are informed and counselled regarding the result ≤ 5 working days of prenatal diagnostic test Denominator: number of women/couples at risk of having a fetus affected by sickle cell disease or thalassaemia who are informed and counselled regarding the result following prenatal diagnostic test Threshold Acceptable level ≥70.0% Achievable level ≥90.0% Mitigations/qualifications Reporting Reporting focus: maternity service Data source: maternity service Responsible for submission: maternity service Reporting period: annually for women tested in the previous financial year Deadline: 30th June
  • 8. Consultation: draft standards for Sickle cell and thalassaemia (SCT) screening programme standards 2016/2017 9 Standard 8: Accuracy of the newborn screening test Rationale To ensure the efficacy of the screening programme the test should have certain levels of specificity and sensitivity. It is therefore, important to monitor the accuracy of the test Objective To identify, with specified sensitivity babies born with conditions where early intervention is likely to be beneficial Criteria Proportion of diagnostic results that are consistent with screen positive result Definitions Numerator: number of babies with a diagnostic result that is consistent with the screen positive results Hb-FS, Hb-FSC and other specified conditions Denominator: number of babies with screen positive results Hb-FS, Hb-FSC and other specified conditions Specified conditions to be detected in newborn screening: HbSS, HbSC, HbS/β thalassaemia (S/β+, S/β°, HbS/β, HbS/γβ, Lepore), HbS DPunjab, HbS/E, HbS OArab, HbS/HPFH Exclusions: other clinically significant haemoglobinopathies likely to be detected as by-products of newborn screening including β thalassaemia major, Hb E/β thalassaemia and β thalassaemia intermedia Sickle cell carriers and carriers of Hb C, Hb D, Hb,E, and Hb OArab Threshold Acceptable standard ≥99.0% accuracy for specified conditions Achievable standard: ≥99.5% accuracy for specified conditions Mitigations/qualifications False negatives (specificity) data collected by the newborn outcome project suggests that it is rare for infants to present clinically with Hb-SS, Hb-SC and other specified conditions with a screen negative result (false negative) Reporting Reporting focus: NBS laboratory Data source: newborn outcomes project Responsible for submission: newborn outcomes project Reporting period: annually for samples received in the laboratory in the previous financial year Deadline: 31st July tbd
  • 9. Consultation: draft standards for Sickle cell and thalassaemia (SCT) screening programme standards 2016/2017 10 Standard 9: Timely reporting of screen positive results to parents Rationale To provide timely results to parents and ensure safe transition from screening into care and to confirm diagnosis. This includes providing parents with information about the screening result, living with and supporting an affected child, and the care pathway. Objective To optimise individual and population health outcomes in babies born with conditions where early intervention is likely to be beneficial Criteria Proportion of infants seen by a healthcare professional within 28 days of age Definitions Numerator: number of infants with screen positive result seen by a healthcare professional ≤ 28 days of age Denominator: number of infants with screen positive result Specified conditions to be detected in newborn screening: HbSS, HbSC, HbS/β thalassaemia (S/β+, S/β°, HbS/β, HbS/γβ, Lepore), HbS/DPunjab, HbS/E, HbS/OArab, HbS/HPFH, Hb S with any other variant and no Hb A, and other clinically significant Haemoglobinopathies likely to be detected as by-products of newborn screening including β thalassaemia major, Hb E/β thalassaemia, and β thalassaemia intermedia Threshold Acceptable standard ≥ 90.0 % Achievable standard: ≥95.0% Mitigations/qualifications Reporting Reporting focus: newborn screening laboratory Data source: newborn screening laboratory Responsible for submission: newborn screening laboratory Reporting period: annually for infants born in the previous financial year Deadline: 31st July
  • 10. Consultation: draft standards for Sickle cell and thalassaemia (SCT) screening programme standards 2016/2017 11 Standard 10 Timely receipt into Specialist Haemoglobinopathy Centres (SHC) Rationale To ensure timely and appropriate management, infants with positive screening results must attend a SHC by 90 days of age. SHCs have a lead responsibility for the care of all patients with sickle cell disease and significant thalassaemia in their geographical region. Objective To optimise individual and population health outcomes in babies born with conditions where early intervention is likely to be beneficial Criteria Proportion of infants with a positive screening result followed up and entered into care within 90 days of age Definitions Numerator: number of infants with screen positive result seen at a SHC ≤ 90 days of age Denominator: number of infants with screen positive result seen at SHC Screen positive results: specified conditions to be detected in newborn screening: HbSS, HbSC, HbS/β thalassaemia (S/β+, S/β°, HbS/β, HbS/γβ, Lepore), HbS/DPunjab, HbS/E, HbS/OArab, HbS/HPFH, Hb S with any other variant and no Hb A, and other clinically significant Haemoglobinopathies likely to be detected as by- products of newborn screening including β thalassaemia major, Hb E/β thalassaemia and β thalassaemia intermedia. Inclusions: SHC may include a local centre working as part of a network Effective timeframe: It is generally accepted that penicillin prophylaxis should start by 3 months of age in children with sickle cell disease, infants with significant thalassaemia do not require penicillin prophylaxis but are still expected to attend a SHC by 90 days of age Threshold Acceptable standard ≥ 90.0% Achievable standard: ≥95.0% Mitigations/qualifications Reporting Reporting focus: SHC geographical area of responsibility Data source: newborn outcomes project Responsible for submission: newborn outcomes project Reporting period: annually for infants born in the previous financial year Deadline: 31st July