District Report Card 2011-2012

IRN# 049106

Westfall Local School District
19463 Pherson Pike, Williamsport, OH 43164-9745—Pickaway County

2011-2012 School Year Report Card
Current Superintendent: Cara S. Riddel (740) 986-3671

Your District’s
Designation: Number of State
Indicators Performance
Value-Added
Measure
Excellent Met out of 26 Index Not Met
19 (0-120 points)
Value-Added

96.6 Component
Score
= Above

= met
+ = above
– = below
State Percentage of Students at and above the Proficient Level
Your District Similar Districts * State
Indicators 2011-2012 2011-2012 2011-2012
The District Report Card for the
3rd Grade Achievement The state requirement is 75 percent
2011-2012 school year shows
1. Reading 80.8% 83.9% 79.0%
the progress districts have made
2. Mathematics 80.6% 84.9% 79.8%
based on four measures of
performance. 4th Grade Achievement The state requirement is 75 percent
3. Reading 83.0% 87.9% 83.3%
4. Mathematics 74.3% 83.9% 78.4%
State
Performance
5th Grade Achievement The state requirement is 75 percent
Indicators Index
5. Reading 73.3% 80.0% 76.8%
Indicators Performance 6. Mathematics 71.1% 71.4% 67.5%
Index 7. Science 72.6% 76.6% 72.5%
6th Grade Achievement The state requirement is 75 percent
93.0% 90.1% 86.7%
Value-Added

AYP
Measure 8. Reading
Value-Added
Component
Score
9. Mathematics 82.5% 85.3% 79.9%
Adequate

+
–
= met
= above
= below
Value-Added 7th Grade Achievement The state requirement is 75 percent
Yearly Progress 10. Reading 86.7% 82.5% 79.5%
11. Mathematics 76.6% 78.1% 73.6%
The combination of the four The state requirement is 75 percent
8th Grade Achievement
measures is the basis for
12. Reading 88.8% 85.3% 83.0%
assigning state designations
13. Mathematics 89.7% 84.0% 79.6%
to districts, buildings and
community schools. 14. Science 75.2% 78.0% 71.5%
Ohio Graduation Tests (10th Grade) The state requirement is 75 percent
The six designations are 15. Reading 84.9% 87.1% 86.0%
• Excellent with Distinction 16. Mathematics 84.0% 85.4% 82.6%
• Excellent 17. Writing 89.1% 89.0% 87.1%
• Effective 18. Science 73.7% 80.4% 76.7%
• Continuous Improvement 19. Social Studies 73.7% 83.8% 81.6%
• Academic Watch Ohio Graduation Tests (11th Grade)** The state requirement is 85 percent
The state requirement is 85 percent
• Academic Emergency 20. Reading 94.7% 94.4% 92.6%
21. Mathematics 93.2% 92.4% 89.9%
State 22. Writing 93.2% 94.2% 93.0%
Indicators To meet a test indicator for grades 23. Science 89.5% 89.6% 85.6%
3-8 and 10, at least 75% of students 24. Social Studies 87.2% 89.6% 87.8%
tested must score proficient or higher Attendance Rate The state requirement is 93 percent
on that test. Other indicator requirements are: 25. All Grades 95.1% 94.9% 94.5%
11th grade Ohio Graduation Tests, 85%; Attendance 2010-11 Four-Year Graduation Rate The state requirement is 90 percent
Rate, 93%; Graduation Rate, 90%. 26. School 89.2% 90.9% 79.7%
Any result at or above the state standard is indicated by a .
On the Web: reportcard.ohio.gov * Similar Districts are based on comparing demographic, socioeconomic and geographic factors. Cumulative results for students who took the tests as 10th or 11th graders.
-- = Not Calculated/Not Displayed when there are fewer than 10 in the group.
**

2

Your District’s Assessment Results Over Time
All students in the district for a full academic year are included in the results.

State
Indicators
The State
Indicators
are based on state
assessments, as well
as on attendance and
graduation rates.
To earn an indicator
for Achievement or
Graduation Tests, at
least 75% of students
must reach proficient
or above for the given
assessment. For
the 11th grade Ohio
Graduation Tests
indicators, a cumulative
85% passage rate for each
assessment is required.

Westfall Local School District, Pickaway County

3

Performance Index
The Performance
Performance Index Calculations Index reflects the
Performance
for the 2011-2012 School Year Index
achievement of every student
enrolled for the full academic
Performance Level Across Grades year. The Performance Index is a
3-8 and 10 for All Tested Subjects weighted average that includes all
Percentage X Weight = Points
(Includes every student enrolled in
the district for a full academic year) tested subjects and grades and
untested students. The greatest
Untested 0.3 X 0.0 = 0.0 weight is given to advanced scores
5.3 X 0.3 = 1.6
(1.2); the weights decrease for each
Limited
performance level and a weight of
Basic 14.1 X 0.6 = 8.4 zero is given to untested students.
This results in a scale from 0 to 120
Proficient 36.2 X 1.0 = 36.2
points. The Performance Index can be
Accelerated 26.2 X 1.1 = 28.9 compared across years to show
district achievement trends.
Advanced 17.9 X 1.2 = 21.5
Performance Index Over Time

Your District’s Performance Index 96.6 2011-2012 2010-2011 2009-2010
96.6 96.2 96.0

Value-Added Measure
Value-Added
Component
Score

Scores reflect grade level and overall composite

+
= met
= above
–
Overall Composite
= below
ratings for the 2011-2012 school year.

Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8

Reading

Mathematics

Legend
Value-Added
Measure Your district’s Value-Added rating represents the progress + = Above
Expected Growth
d
your district has made with its students since last school year.
In contrast, achievement scores represent students’ performance at = Met
Expected Growth
a point in time. A score of “Above” indicates greater than one year of progress
e
w

has been achieved; “Met” indicates one year of progress has been achieved;
“Below” indicates less than one year of progress has been achieved.
- = Below
Expected Growth

On the Web: reportcard.ohio.gov

4

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
e
Adequate Yearly ed ativ
Progress tag aN ities nt
va
n
de
r
las
k
bil cie
ad n anic /A nic isa rofi
Grades 3-8 and 10
Di
s
I sla isp ian sp
a D hP
Reading y
ific
H Ind al Hi ith lis
n ts all ac
n- ci n- w ng
de mi
c no ica
n ic Ra no ts dE AYP Determination
and u /P k, an ti- e, en ite
St on
o n
lac me
r
isp
l it ud
Mathematics All Ec A sia B A H Mu Wh St Lim by Indicator
Percent Proficient

Reading
Reading Met Met NR NR NR NR NR Met Not Met NR Proficiency: Not Met

Mathematics
Mathematics Met Met NR NR NR NR NR Met Not Met NR Proficiency:
Not Met

Reading
Percent Tested

Reading Met Met NR NR NR NR NR Met Met NR Met
Participation:

Mathematics
Mathematics Met Met NR NR NR NR NR Met Met NR Participation: Met

Graduation
Graduation Rate Met Met NR NR NR NR NR Met NR NR Rate: Met

Attendance
Attendance Rate* Met Rate: Met

AYP Determination AYP
Met Met NR NR NR NR NR Met Not Met NR Determination Not Met
by Subgroup for Your District:

Legend
This legend explains terms used in the above chart that describe whether each student group met this year’s AYP goals.
For test indicators, AYP can be met in one of four ways: For the non-test attendance rate indicator, AYP can be met in one of three ways:
1) meeting the AYP targets with current year results; 1) meeting the AYP target with the current year results;
2) meeting the AYP targets with two-year combined results; 2) meeting the AYP target with two-year combined results;
3) meeting the improvement requirements of Safe Harbor; 3) making improvement over the previous year.
4) meeting the AYP targets with projected results.
* Attendance Rate is evaluated only for the All Students subgroup.
For the non-test graduation rate indicator, AYP can be met in one of two ways:
1) meeting the AYP target with the current year results;
2) making a 2 percentage point improvement over the previous year.

N/A Not applicable.

Not Required – This indicator was not evaluated for this subgroup because the subgroup size was smaller than the minimum number needed to achieve a statistically
NR eliable result. 30 students is the minimum size for the proficiency and non-test indicators, while 40 is the minimum size for the participation rate indicators.

Met This subgroup met AYP for this indicator with its current year, two-year combined, Safe Harbor, or growth measure results.

Not Met This subgroup did not meet AYP for this indicator.

Class of 2011 Four-Year Graduation Rate Information Class of 2010 Five-Year Graduation Rate Information

All American Indian/ Asian or Black, Econ. All American Indian/ Asian or Black, Econ.
Students Alaska Native Pacific Islander non-Hispanic Disadvtgd Students Alaska Native Pacific Islander non-Hispanic Disadvtgd

89.2% -- -- -- 83.3% 88.4% -- -- -- --

Limited English Students with White, Limited English Students with White,
Hispanic Multi-Racial Hispanic Multi-Racial
Proficient Disabilities non-Hispanic Proficient Disabilities non-Hispanic

-- -- -- -- 89.1% -- -- -- -- 88.4%


5

State and Federally Required District Information
Your District’s Percentage of Students at Each Performance Level
American Asian or Non- Students Non- Limited
Black, Multi- White, Econ.
Indian/ Pacific Hispanic Disabled with Migrant Econ. English Female Male
non-Hispanic Racial non-Hispanic Disadvtgd
Alaska Native Islander Students Disabilities Disadvtgd Proficient

Percentage of Students Scoring Limited
Reading 0.0 -- -- -- -- 5.0 3.1 17.5 -- 1.8 8.5 -- 3.0 6.6
Writing -- -- -- -- -- 1.7 0.0 10.5 -- 0.0 4.4 -- 0.0 3.4
Mathematics 27.3 -- -- -- -- 6.2 3.3 29.1 -- 2.9 10.5 -- 5.1 7.7
Science -- -- -- -- -- 3.8 1.6 15.8 -- 1.9 6.1 -- 2.7 4.7
Social Studies -- -- -- -- -- 9.6 4.0 38.9 -- 5.4 15.9 -- 6.6 12.3

Percentage of Students Scoring Basic
Reading 18.2 -- -- -- -- 10.8 7.5 35.0 -- 7.4 14.9 -- 8.6 12.9
Writing -- -- -- -- -- 9.5 6.0 26.3 -- 4.1 17.8 -- 6.6 12.1
Mathematics 0.0 -- -- -- -- 14.3 12.1 26.2 -- 11.2 16.9 -- 14.9 12.9
Science -- -- -- -- -- 22.4 18.1 47.4 -- 17.2 29.4 -- 25.8 19.3
Social Studies -- -- -- -- -- 15.7 15.0 27.8 -- 13.5 22.7 -- 19.7 14.0

Percentage of Students Scoring Proficient
Reading 63.6 -- -- -- -- 37.9 39.9 24.3 -- 35.0 41.3 -- 35.1 40.5
Writing -- -- -- -- -- 52.6 55.0 47.4 -- 52.7 55.6 -- 49.2 58.6
Mathematics 27.3 -- -- -- -- 35.8 37.7 22.3 -- 33.7 38.2 -- 35.9 35.7
Science -- -- -- -- -- 30.3 31.8 21.1 -- 29.8 30.7 -- 27.4 32.8
Social Studies -- -- -- -- -- 30.4 33.0 16.7 -- 33.8 25.0 -- 26.2 35.1

Percentage of Students Scoring Accelerated
Reading 9.1 -- -- -- -- 29.4 31.7 11.7 -- 35.3 22.3 -- 33.6 25.3
Writing -- -- -- -- -- 32.8 38.0 0.0 -- 40.5 17.8 -- 41.0 22.4
Mathematics 36.4 -- -- -- -- 24.4 26.8 7.8 -- 27.2 21.3 -- 27.0 22.2
Science -- -- -- -- -- 23.8 27.7 5.3 -- 27.0 20.9 -- 25.8 22.9
Social Studies -- -- -- -- -- 20.0 23.0 0.0 -- 20.3 18.2 -- 23.0 15.8

Percentage of Students Scoring Advanced
Reading 9.1 -- -- -- -- 16.9 17.8 11.7 -- 20.5 13.1 -- 19.7 14.7
Writing -- -- -- -- -- 3.4 1.0 15.8 -- 2.7 4.4 -- 3.3 3.4
Mathematics 9.1 -- -- -- -- 19.4 20.1 14.6 -- 25.0 13.1 -- 17.2 21.5
Science -- -- -- -- -- 19.7 20.9 10.5 -- 24.2 12.9 -- 18.3 20.3
Social Studies -- -- -- -- -- 24.3 25.0 16.7 -- 27.0 18.2 -- 24.6 22.8

Your District’s Students 2011-2012
Average Daily Black, American Asian or White, Limited Students
Student Economically
non- Indian or Pacific Hispanic Multi-Racial non- English with Migrant
Disadvantaged
Enrollment Hispanic Alaska Native Islander Hispanic Proficient Disabilities
1611 1.0% -- -- -- 1.0% 97.2% 46.3% -- 11.7% --

-- = Not Calculated/Not Displayed when there are fewer than 10 in the group. Number of Limited English Proficient Students
Excluded from Accountability Calculations --

Under the federal
No Child Left Behind
School Teacher Information
High-Poverty Low-Poverty
Act, states are All Schools in Your Schools Located Schools Located
District in Your District* in Your District*
required to report
Percentage of teachers with at least a Bachelor’s Degree 98.1% 0.0% 0.0%
certain data about
schools and teachers. 66.5% 0.0% 0.0%
Percentage of teachers with at least a Master’s Degree
Data presented here
are for reporting Percentage of core academic subject elementary and secondary classes
purposes only and 0.0% -- --
not taught by highly qualified teachers
are not used in the Percentage of core academic subject elementary and secondary classes
computation of the taught by properly certified teachers
100.0% -- --
state designation
Percentage of core academic subject elementary and secondary classes taught
for districts and by teachers with temporary, conditional or long-term substitute certification/licensure
0.0% -- --
schools.
*High-poverty schools are those ranked in the top quartile based on the percentage of economically disadvantaged students. Low-poverty schools are those ranked in the bottom quartile based
on the percentage of economically disadvantaged students. A district may have buildings in both quartiles, in just one quartile or in neither quartile.
-- = Not Calculated/Not Displayed when there are fewer than 10 in the group.


6

Determining Your District’s Designation
Determining your district’s report card designation is a multi-step process. The first step is to determine a preliminary designation, which
is based on the following components: 1) the percentage of indicators met, 2) the Performance Index and 3) AYP determination.

Indicators Met Performance Index AYP Designation Preliminary Designation
94%-100% or 100 to 120 and Met or Not Met = Excellent or Effective

75%-93.9% or 90 to 99.9 and Met or Not Met = Effective or Continuous Improvement

0%-74.9% or 0 to 89.9 and Met = Continuous
Improvement
50%-74.9% or 80 to 89.9 and Not Met =

31%-49.9% or 70 to 79.9 and Not Met = Academic Watch

0%-30.9% and 0 to 69.9 and Not Met = Academic Emergency

The preliminary designation results from identifying the Once the preliminary designation is determined, Value-Added,
higher value between the percentage of indicators met by the fourth measure in the accountability system, is evaluated
your district and your district’s Performance Index. to determine the impact (if any) on the district’s final
AYP then is evaluated to determine its effect on the designation.
preliminary designation. There are two ways in which
AYP can affect the preliminary designation. 1. If your district’s designation either is increased or decreased
due to AYP, Value-Added has no impact on the designation
1. If a district meets AYP in the current year, it can be and the preliminary designation becomes the final designation.
rated no lower than Continuous Improvement.
2. If your district experiences above expected growth in the
2. If an Excellent or Effective district does not meet AYP current year, your district’s final designation will increase by
for the same two (or more) subgroups for three one designation.
consecutive years, its rating will be decreased to
Effective or Continuous Improvement (respectively). 3. If your district experiences below expected growth for at
least two consecutive years, your district’s final
designation will decrease by one designation.

Preliminary Designation Value-Added Measure* Value-Added
Component
Score
Final Designation
= met
Above expected growth in the current year + = above
– = below
Excellent with Distinction
Excellent and or
Below expected growth for 2 consecutive years Effective
Above expected growth in the current year Excellent
Effective and or
Below expected growth for 2 consecutive years Continuous Improvement
Above expected growth in the current year Effective
Continuous Improvement and or
Below expected growth for 2 consecutive years Academic Watch
Above expected growth in the current year Continuous Improvement
Academic Watch and or
Below expected growth for 2 consecutive years Academic Emergency
Above expected growth in the current year Academic Watch
Academic Emergency and or
Below expected growth for 2 consecutive years Academic Emergency
*In all other cases, Value-Added will have no impact on the designation and the preliminary designation will become the final designation.


7

The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP),
often referred to as “The Nation’s Report Card,” is the only nationally representative and
continuing assessment that enables the comparison of performance in Ohio and other states
in various subject areas. Schools and students within each state are selected randomly to
be a part of the assessment. Not all students in the state or in a particular school take the
assessment. Data are reported at the state level only, and there are no individual student or
even school summary results. The assessments are conducted in mathematics, reading, science,
writing, the arts, civics, economics, geography and U.S. history.
To view Ohio’s most recent
NAEP results, go to:
http://education.ohio.gov
and search for key word “NAEP”


District Report Card 2011-2012

More Related Content

Similar to District Report Card 2011-2012

More from JD Williamson

Recently uploaded

District Report Card 2011-2012