This document summarizes a research presentation on (dis)connectivity in travel contexts. It identifies several key themes for further research:
1) ICTs have blurred boundaries between life domains, integrating work, travel and personal life. This raises questions about work-life balance and expectations around availability.
2) Connectivity behaviors are contextual based on travel type, mode, and party. However, work obligations and social expectations often make complete disconnection difficult.
3) Remaining constantly connected may impact health and wellbeing, but perceptions around availability expectations are often unclear.
4) Individual personality and lifestyle play a role in decisions around (dis)connecting, but generational and gender differences also exist. Further research
Oeb slides zone of effective learning - (final)Zac Woolfitt
The Zone of Effective Learning with Technology is a conceptual representation to examine under what conditions an individual can be said to be using a learning technology effectively. Using Maslow’s four stages of learning we can move from unconsciously un-competent (as a servant to technology), to consciously competent (as a master of technology, on our terms).
The ‘Sweet spot of maximum technology impact’ is the concept I use to define the desired point of balance between the potential of a technology, your ability to apply that technology to a specific learning task, and your understanding of how well you are mastering the technology for the task in hand. It basically boils down to knowing how to use a specific technology and staying on track while you are using it to do what you need it to do, without getting side tracked. That is a lot easier said than done.
Please get in touch if you'd like to comment or add your own ideas: zac.woolfitt@inholland.nl
The digital landscape for education. We hear so many different opinions on topics such as digital natives, digital literacy and digital technologies such as ‘mobile’ that it is hard to know where to begin. In this session I identify where we currently are in UK education, where some of us are headed and what may be on the horizon to help us enhance the learner experience.
2023 Higher Level Group of Education and TrainingLinda Castañeda
Presentación realizada por Linda Castañeda para su ponencia en la reunión del Higher Level Group of Education and Training de la UE en el Marco de la Presidencia española del consejo europeo en jerez de la Frontera el 29 de junio de 2023
Harnessing the Blend: Creating authentic learning experiencesdebbieholley1
Keynote IGPP Online Conference
Assessing the benefits of Blended Learning in Higher Education.
Recent research from the Office for Students (OfS) highlighted the positive aspects of blended learning in higher education. In their 2022 report, OfS stated 79% of UK university students were satisfied with blended learning. Furthermore, the combination of in-person and online teaching and learning in higher education enables flexibility in physical attendance and allows greater accessibility for students. This supports students who have caring responsibilities and those in need of reasonable adjustments where exclusive physical or virtual attendance may adversely impact them. Blended learning has been further identified as a new way of bridging the gap in the higher education system by engaging better with underrepresented students.
However, OfS found that 1 in 5 students in 2022 reported dissatisfaction with blended learning. One reason for dissatisfaction is the worry of ‘content overload’ on some courses where some students reported receiving more content online than is manageable within the working week. The overloading risks reduction in course quality and student satisfaction that should be at the heart of students journeys in higher education. This highlights the need for conversations around blended learning to understand the ways it can be improved to better support both staff and students.
Assessing the Benefits of Blended Learning in Higher Education brings together key stakeholders in higher education to learn how to deliver blended learning to maximise the benefit for students and staff and create a more productive, inclusive, and fair environment.
Interview with David H. Jonassen: Looking at the Field of Educational Technol...eraser Juan José Calderón
Interview with David H. Jonassen: Looking at the Field of
Educational Technology from Radical and Multiple Perspectives.
Ali Simsek Anadolu
University, Turkey
Educational Futures: personalisation, privatisation and privacy debbieholley1
Educational Futures: personalisation, privatisation and privacy
In this presentation, Professor Debbie Holley reflects on the digital solutions proposed to scale and solve our digital educational requirements of the future. What are the challenges and opportunities afforded by technologies, and who will benefit and how? In a time where education becoming increasingly commercialised, what are the changing balances between public and private funding, the requirements for a different set of workforce skills, and the needs of those wishing to access education? The recent pandemic has resulted in rapid change and innovation, and the contested role of where learning will take place is receiving unprecedented attention.
EdTech World Forum 2022
In this presentation, Professor Debbie Holley reflects on the digital solutions proposed to scale and solve our digital educational requirements of the future. What are the challenges and opportunities afforded by technologies, and who will benefit and how? In a time where education becoming increasingly commercialised, what are the changing balances between public and private funding, the requirements for a different set of workforce skills, and the needs of those wishing to access education? The recent pandemic has resulted in rapid change and innovation, and the contested role of where learning will take place is receiving unprecedented attention.
Presentation given at SCVO event in Edinburgh on 22nd August, 2017 summarising the 'Rapid Review of Evidence for Basic Digital Skills' produced by UWS for SCVO https://digitalparticipation.scot/resources/reports
"Impact of front-end architecture on development cost", Viktor TurskyiFwdays
I have heard many times that architecture is not important for the front-end. Also, many times I have seen how developers implement features on the front-end just following the standard rules for a framework and think that this is enough to successfully launch the project, and then the project fails. How to prevent this and what approach to choose? I have launched dozens of complex projects and during the talk we will analyze which approaches have worked for me and which have not.
Epistemic Interaction - tuning interfaces to provide information for AI supportAlan Dix
Paper presented at SYNERGY workshop at AVI 2024, Genoa, Italy. 3rd June 2024
https://alandix.com/academic/papers/synergy2024-epistemic/
As machine learning integrates deeper into human-computer interactions, the concept of epistemic interaction emerges, aiming to refine these interactions to enhance system adaptability. This approach encourages minor, intentional adjustments in user behaviour to enrich the data available for system learning. This paper introduces epistemic interaction within the context of human-system communication, illustrating how deliberate interaction design can improve system understanding and adaptation. Through concrete examples, we demonstrate the potential of epistemic interaction to significantly advance human-computer interaction by leveraging intuitive human communication strategies to inform system design and functionality, offering a novel pathway for enriching user-system engagements.
LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...DanBrown980551
Do you want to learn how to model and simulate an electrical network from scratch in under an hour?
Then welcome to this PowSyBl workshop, hosted by Rte, the French Transmission System Operator (TSO)!
During the webinar, you will discover the PowSyBl ecosystem as well as handle and study an electrical network through an interactive Python notebook.
PowSyBl is an open source project hosted by LF Energy, which offers a comprehensive set of features for electrical grid modelling and simulation. Among other advanced features, PowSyBl provides:
- A fully editable and extendable library for grid component modelling;
- Visualization tools to display your network;
- Grid simulation tools, such as power flows, security analyses (with or without remedial actions) and sensitivity analyses;
The framework is mostly written in Java, with a Python binding so that Python developers can access PowSyBl functionalities as well.
What you will learn during the webinar:
- For beginners: discover PowSyBl's functionalities through a quick general presentation and the notebook, without needing any expert coding skills;
- For advanced developers: master the skills to efficiently apply PowSyBl functionalities to your real-world scenarios.
Essentials of Automations: Optimizing FME Workflows with ParametersSafe Software
Are you looking to streamline your workflows and boost your projects’ efficiency? Do you find yourself searching for ways to add flexibility and control over your FME workflows? If so, you’re in the right place.
Join us for an insightful dive into the world of FME parameters, a critical element in optimizing workflow efficiency. This webinar marks the beginning of our three-part “Essentials of Automation” series. This first webinar is designed to equip you with the knowledge and skills to utilize parameters effectively: enhancing the flexibility, maintainability, and user control of your FME projects.
Here’s what you’ll gain:
- Essentials of FME Parameters: Understand the pivotal role of parameters, including Reader/Writer, Transformer, User, and FME Flow categories. Discover how they are the key to unlocking automation and optimization within your workflows.
- Practical Applications in FME Form: Delve into key user parameter types including choice, connections, and file URLs. Allow users to control how a workflow runs, making your workflows more reusable. Learn to import values and deliver the best user experience for your workflows while enhancing accuracy.
- Optimization Strategies in FME Flow: Explore the creation and strategic deployment of parameters in FME Flow, including the use of deployment and geometry parameters, to maximize workflow efficiency.
- Pro Tips for Success: Gain insights on parameterizing connections and leveraging new features like Conditional Visibility for clarity and simplicity.
We’ll wrap up with a glimpse into future webinars, followed by a Q&A session to address your specific questions surrounding this topic.
Don’t miss this opportunity to elevate your FME expertise and drive your projects to new heights of efficiency.
Search and Society: Reimagining Information Access for Radical FuturesBhaskar Mitra
The field of Information retrieval (IR) is currently undergoing a transformative shift, at least partly due to the emerging applications of generative AI to information access. In this talk, we will deliberate on the sociotechnical implications of generative AI for information access. We will argue that there is both a critical necessity and an exciting opportunity for the IR community to re-center our research agendas on societal needs while dismantling the artificial separation between the work on fairness, accountability, transparency, and ethics in IR and the rest of IR research. Instead of adopting a reactionary strategy of trying to mitigate potential social harms from emerging technologies, the community should aim to proactively set the research agenda for the kinds of systems we should build inspired by diverse explicitly stated sociotechnical imaginaries. The sociotechnical imaginaries that underpin the design and development of information access technologies needs to be explicitly articulated, and we need to develop theories of change in context of these diverse perspectives. Our guiding future imaginaries must be informed by other academic fields, such as democratic theory and critical theory, and should be co-developed with social science scholars, legal scholars, civil rights and social justice activists, and artists, among others.
Accelerate your Kubernetes clusters with Varnish CachingThijs Feryn
A presentation about the usage and availability of Varnish on Kubernetes. This talk explores the capabilities of Varnish caching and shows how to use the Varnish Helm chart to deploy it to Kubernetes.
This presentation was delivered at K8SUG Singapore. See https://feryn.eu/presentations/accelerate-your-kubernetes-clusters-with-varnish-caching-k8sug-singapore-28-2024 for more details.
State of ICS and IoT Cyber Threat Landscape Report 2024 previewPrayukth K V
The IoT and OT threat landscape report has been prepared by the Threat Research Team at Sectrio using data from Sectrio, cyber threat intelligence farming facilities spread across over 85 cities around the world. In addition, Sectrio also runs AI-based advanced threat and payload engagement facilities that serve as sinks to attract and engage sophisticated threat actors, and newer malware including new variants and latent threats that are at an earlier stage of development.
The latest edition of the OT/ICS and IoT security Threat Landscape Report 2024 also covers:
State of global ICS asset and network exposure
Sectoral targets and attacks as well as the cost of ransom
Global APT activity, AI usage, actor and tactic profiles, and implications
Rise in volumes of AI-powered cyberattacks
Major cyber events in 2024
Malware and malicious payload trends
Cyberattack types and targets
Vulnerability exploit attempts on CVEs
Attacks on counties – USA
Expansion of bot farms – how, where, and why
In-depth analysis of the cyber threat landscape across North America, South America, Europe, APAC, and the Middle East
Why are attacks on smart factories rising?
Cyber risk predictions
Axis of attacks – Europe
Systemic attacks in the Middle East
Download the full report from here:
https://sectrio.com/resources/ot-threat-landscape-reports/sectrio-releases-ot-ics-and-iot-security-threat-landscape-report-2024/
GraphRAG is All You need? LLM & Knowledge GraphGuy Korland
Guy Korland, CEO and Co-founder of FalkorDB, will review two articles on the integration of language models with knowledge graphs.
1. Unifying Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs: A Roadmap.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.08302
2. Microsoft Research's GraphRAG paper and a review paper on various uses of knowledge graphs:
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/blog/graphrag-unlocking-llm-discovery-on-narrative-private-data/
Connector Corner: Automate dynamic content and events by pushing a buttonDianaGray10
Here is something new! In our next Connector Corner webinar, we will demonstrate how you can use a single workflow to:
Create a campaign using Mailchimp with merge tags/fields
Send an interactive Slack channel message (using buttons)
Have the message received by managers and peers along with a test email for review
But there’s more:
In a second workflow supporting the same use case, you’ll see:
Your campaign sent to target colleagues for approval
If the “Approve” button is clicked, a Jira/Zendesk ticket is created for the marketing design team
But—if the “Reject” button is pushed, colleagues will be alerted via Slack message
Join us to learn more about this new, human-in-the-loop capability, brought to you by Integration Service connectors.
And...
Speakers:
Akshay Agnihotri, Product Manager
Charlie Greenberg, Host
JMeter webinar - integration with InfluxDB and GrafanaRTTS
Watch this recorded webinar about real-time monitoring of application performance. See how to integrate Apache JMeter, the open-source leader in performance testing, with InfluxDB, the open-source time-series database, and Grafana, the open-source analytics and visualization application.
In this webinar, we will review the benefits of leveraging InfluxDB and Grafana when executing load tests and demonstrate how these tools are used to visualize performance metrics.
Length: 30 minutes
Session Overview
-------------------------------------------
During this webinar, we will cover the following topics while demonstrating the integrations of JMeter, InfluxDB and Grafana:
- What out-of-the-box solutions are available for real-time monitoring JMeter tests?
- What are the benefits of integrating InfluxDB and Grafana into the load testing stack?
- Which features are provided by Grafana?
- Demonstration of InfluxDB and Grafana using a practice web application
To view the webinar recording, go to:
https://www.rttsweb.com/jmeter-integration-webinar
Builder.ai Founder Sachin Dev Duggal's Strategic Approach to Create an Innova...Ramesh Iyer
In today's fast-changing business world, Companies that adapt and embrace new ideas often need help to keep up with the competition. However, fostering a culture of innovation takes much work. It takes vision, leadership and willingness to take risks in the right proportion. Sachin Dev Duggal, co-founder of Builder.ai, has perfected the art of this balance, creating a company culture where creativity and growth are nurtured at each stage.
Empowering NextGen Mobility via Large Action Model Infrastructure (LAMI): pav...
(Dis)Connectivity in the Travel Context: Setting an Agenda for Research
1. ENTER 2017 Research Track Slide Number 1
(Dis)Connectivity in the Travel Context:
Setting an Agenda for Research
Barbara Neuhofera & Adele Ladkinb
aSalzburg University of Applied Sciences, Austria
bBournemouth University, UK
barbara.neuhofer@fh-salzburg.ac.at
aladkin@bournemouth.ac.uk
www.fh-salzburg.ac.at I www.bournemouth.ac.uk
2. ENTER 2017 Research Track Slide Number 2
What (or who) keeps you from disconnecting
when on holiday?
4. ENTER 2017 Research Track Slide Number 4
Introduction
Travel is travel is technology-
mediated.
Smartphones enable tourists to
connect on an unprecedented scale,
connecting to anyone, any
information, anywhere and anytime
(Neuhofer et al., 2014a; Wang et al., 2014a).
ICTs have era of ‘constant-
connectivity’ and an ‘always-on
culture’ (Schlachter, McDowall & Cropley,
2015)
5. ENTER 2017 Research Track Slide Number 5
Introduction
• Connectivity has however not only changed travel,
but also the wider work and life domains
• People can now carry out work, leisure, family and
travel activities at the same time (Chamakiotis et al., 2014).
• Potential downsides to being connected 24/7.
• Being ‘switched-on’ can compromise travel in that it
creates pressures, whether real or perceived, and can
make it difficult to re-charge batteries, reduce stress
and leave work behind (Schlachter et al., 2015).
6. ENTER 2017 Research Track Slide Number 6
Research Aim & Rationale
Investigate the ‘flipside of digital technology’ to
develop a better understanding of why and how
people connect and disconnect from ICTs
Identify key areas of research for an agenda
around (dis)connectivity of travel experiences
8. ENTER 2017 Research Track Slide Number 8
Era of ‘Connectedness’
• Mobile lifestyles and mobile
smartphone devices have
transformed tourist experiences in
numerous ways (Gretzel & Jamal, 2009; Neuhofer et
al., 2012; 2014; Wang et al., 2014a, 2014b)
• Extended ecosystem as
individuals in which tourists connect
and co-create experiences offline and
online at the same time (Neuhofer et al., 2012;
2015; Wang et al. 2012; Wang et al., 2014)
10. ENTER 2017 Research Track Slide Number 10
Theoretical Background
Most studies in the tourism field
– Impact of ICTs on experiences
– Technology-mediated and enhanced experiences (Tussyadiah and
Fesenmaier, 2009; Neuhofer, Ladkin and Buhalis, 2012; Wang et al. 2014)
Only a dearth of recent work on challenges around
(dis)connecting in the tourism domain
• Disconnected tourist experiences and digital dead zones (Pearce and Gretzel, 2012)
• Technology-induced tensions in ‘unplugged’ experiences (Paris et al., 2015)
• Enablers and barriers that make or break connected tourist experiences (Neuhofer, Buhalis
& Ladkin, 2015)
• Drivers of connectivity and the consequences of being (dis)connected (Tanti and Buhalis,
2016)
• Mobile technologies and tourists’ desire for disconnection at campsites (Dickinson et al., 2016)
11. ENTER 2017 Research Track Slide Number 11
Need for discussing
(dis)connectivity?
• Traditionally, travel motivation grounded in travel as a
means of escapism and reversal of everyday (Cohen, 1979)
• Ubiquitous technology creates life interdomain
integration, leading to blurred boundaries between life,
work, travel (Matthews et al., 2014)
• Growing recognition of the need for ‘unplugged’ and
‘digital-detox’ experiences (Pearce and Gretzel, 2012; Neuhofer, 2016)
• Increasing discussion of issues around being ‘switched-on’
and consequences in occupational health, psychology
disciplines(Schlachter et al., 2015)
12. ENTER 2017 Research Track Slide Number 12
(Dis)Connectivity in
Travel, Home and Work Domains
• ICTs impact on the work-life balance and create
an always-on culture, which can be positive or
negative.
• Work, home travel spheres are no longer distinct
• Permeability between work and life (Chamakiotis et
al., 2014)
• Unhealthy work-life balance (Xanthopoulou et al., 2009)
• Calls for a revival of the work-life balance debate
to re-define what work-life separation and
balance means in the digital age.
13. ENTER 2017 Research Track Slide Number 13
Problem Definition
• Traditionally, Leisure travel is for rest, relaxation, escape
from the mundane and to re-charge....
BUT
• Now easy for travellers to be connected anywhere
anytime to family, friends, other travelllers ...and work!
14. ENTER 2017 Research Track Slide Number 14
Methodological Approach
Research Approach
1) Secondary research to identify status-quo of the
literature, emerging discourses and current gaps in
knowledge
1) Qualitative thematic analysis of a multi-disciplinary
symposium, including tourism, geography,
occupational health, psychology, wellbeing, human
computer interaction, user experience design, and
human resources
Research question:
‘What are the emerging areas of research on
(dis)connectivity in the travel context?’
16. ENTER 2017 Research Track Slide Number 16
Connectivity & fluid life
integration
• ICTs lead to travel life integration
• Blurring lines and ‘fluid boundaries’ across all life
domains
• Travel is extension of everyday life – interconnected
(Wang et al., 2014a)
• Convenience of being switched-on to manage all
aspects of life from the smartphone
17. ENTER 2017 Research Track Slide Number 17
“Being wired has transformed my life. I am wired all the time.
I hate being offline. I feel connected to people I know online
and I know offline. The world I don’t see any distinctions
between those things.”
18. ENTER 2017 Research Track Slide Number 18
Connectivity & fluid life
integration
• ‘Connectivity Dilemma’ – as people struggle
between wanting to connect and
disconnect at the same time (Dickinson et al. (2016)
• Connectivity behaviour is contextual
• Depending on travel types and travel
modes and travel parties
19. ENTER 2017 Research Track Slide Number 19
Dis(connectivity) &
work-based challenges
• Work-related issues relating to (dis)connectivity
in tourist experiences
• Switching-off during leisure time / travel
determined by work type (knowledge work,
manual work) and work modes (flexible working,
working from home, part time or full time)
• Discussion of current practices of how individuals
deal with work and leisure in an always-on
culture
20. ENTER 2017 Research Track Slide Number 20
“I don’t see my work as a 9/5…I’m constantly juggling both,
and it is not as simple as dividing a block of my day. I assume
that my sacrifice is that by bringing in personal things into
my working hours, this means that I overflow and my work
happens in my life time, my off-time… it does run through
evenings and weekends.”
21. ENTER 2017 Research Track Slide Number 21
• Occupational health, human resource and policy
related questions
• Few organisational guidelines available on how to
cope with digital technology in/outside of work
• Questions around ‘responsibility’ – who is
responsible for a reasonable ICTs use
• Shared responsibility organisations/employees
• Unwritten rules and expectations about good
practice / behaviour
22. ENTER 2017 Research Track Slide Number 22
“What can good organisations do? JP Morgan and
Barclays have got a protected weekend policy. Atos,
French IT company, they have banned internal email from
2011…Daimler have gone a little bit more technical to turn
off emails out of office hours and automatically delete
emails sent to staff during annual leave and holiday.”
23. ENTER 2017 Research Track Slide Number 23
Dis(connectivity) & health and
wellbeing
• Questions around whether ‘taking a break’
switching off is still a valid concept in 2017?
• Emerging research linking ICTs, tourism literature to
occupational health, psychology, wellbeing domains
• How does remaining ‘switched on’ affect non-work
time (quality)
• How does not switching-off impact on actual and
perceived health and wellbeing
• Reasons for not switching-off (inability,
unwillingness)
24. ENTER 2017 Research Track Slide Number 24
“Don’t work while on holiday. Holidays are a bit like
mobile phones. If you consider charging your phone in the
evening for half an hour, it might get you through the next
work day, but not much longer. With holidays, it is a long
period of time where you can actually fully recharge your
batteries.”
25. ENTER 2017 Research Track Slide Number 25
Dis(connectivity) & social
obligations and family roles
• Reasons for not switching-off often related
to ‘internal obligations’, ‘reachable for
others’, especially family
• Inability to switch-off because of the need
to be online, monitor work emails, and
‘fear of missing out’ at work and at home
• Misperceptions / miscommunication
around availability expectations
26. ENTER 2017 Research Track Slide Number 26
“A key issue is about expectations around technology use. Do
I have to be available or not? There are often a lot of
misperceptions of what others expect of us.
A lot of the time with expectations they are not
communicated. So I just assume everyone thinks that I need
to be available, but actually never ask anyone do they expect
it or not.”
27. ENTER 2017 Research Track Slide Number 27
Dis(connectivity) & the self
• (Dis)connectivity decisions are inherently
subjective and individual
• ‘One’s own choice’, ‘own personality’, ‘own
perceived pressure’, and ‘own lifestyle’, and
‘generational’ ‘gender’ differences
• (Dis)connectivity not only framed by institutional,
organisational, infrastructural or social
boundaries, but determined by the end-user
28. ENTER 2017 Research Track Slide Number 28
Disconnectivity & digital detox
• Questions around switching-off completely,
temporal disconnection (times of the day,
weekends, week retreats)
• Switching off for a change – digital age
• Switching off for health and wellbeing
reasons, trying out digital-detox retreats
29. ENTER 2017 Research Track Slide Number 29
Conclusions and Implications
– Discussing the flipside of technology in the tourism
experience and related multi-disciplinary literature
– Developing an agenda for research
– Basis for discussions of ‘paradox’ of connectivity and
disconnectivity
– Organisational implications to map out challenges and
opportunities in travel-related connectivity and
disconnectivity in the digital age
30. ENTER 2017 Research Track Slide Number 30
Reference List
• Bergström-Casonowsky, G. (2013). Working life on the move, domestic life at a standstill? Work related travel and responsibility for home and family. Gender, Work and Organization, 20(3): 311-326.
• Campbell C. S., (2000). Work/family border theory: A new theory of work/family balance. Human Relations, 53(6): 747-770.
• Chamakiotis, P., Whiting, R., Symon, G. & Roby, H. (2014). Exploring transitions and work-life balance. Twenty Second European Conference on Information Systems. Tel Aviv.
• Chong, M.K., Whittle, J., Rashid, U., Ang, C.S., Whiting, R., Roby, H., Chamakiotis, P. and Symon, G. (2014). Methods for monitoring work-life balance in a digital world', Socio-Technical Practices and
Work-Home Boundaries, Toronto.
• Cohen, E. (1979). A phenomenology of tourist experiences. Sociology, 13(2): 179-201.
• Dickinson, J.E., Hibbert, J.F. & Filimonau, V. (2016). Mobile technology and the tourist experience: (Dis)connection at the campsite. Tourism Management, 57: 193-201.
• Gretzel, U., & Jamal, T. (2009). Conceptualizing the creative tourist class: Technology, mobility, and tourism experiences. Tourism Analysis, 14(4): 471-481.
• Kim, J. & Tussyadiah, I.P. (2013). Social networking and social support in tourism experience: The moderating role of online self-presentation strategies. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 30(1):
78-92.
• Munar, A.M., & Jacobsen, J.K.S. (2014). Motivations for sharing tourism experiences through social media. Tourism Management, 43: 46-54.
• Nansen, B., Arnold, M., Gibbs, M., and Davis, H. (2010). Time, space and technology in the working-home: an unsettled nexus. New Technology, Work and Employment, 25(2): 136-153.
• Neuhofer, B. (2016). Value co-creation and co-destruction in connected tourist experiences. In Inversini, A. and Schegg, R. (Eds.), Information and communication technologies in tourism 2016.
Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 779-792.
• Neuhofer, B., Buhalis, D. & Ladkin, A. (2014a). A typology of technology‐enhanced tourism experiences. International Journal of Tourism Research, 16(4): 340-350.
• Neuhofer, B., Buhalis, D., & Ladkin, A. (2014b). Co-creation through technology: Dimensions of social connectedness. In Z. Xiang & I. Tussyadiah (Eds.), Information and communication technologies in
tourism 2014. Vienna: Springer, pp. 339–352.
• Neuhofer, B., Buhalis, D. & Ladkin, A. (2015). Technology as a Catalyst of Change: Enablers and Barriers of the Tourist Experience and Their Consequences. In Tussyadiah, I and Inversini, A. (Eds.),
Information and communication technologies in tourism 2015. Lugano, Switzerland: Springer Verlag, pp. 789-802.
• Paris, C.M., Berger, E.A., Rubin, S., & Casson, M. (2015). Disconnected and unplugged: Experiences of technology induced anxieties and tensions while traveling. In Tussyadiah, I. & Inversini, A. (Eds.),
Information and communication technologies in tourism 2015. Lugano, Switzerland: Springer, pp. 803-816.
• Pearce, P.L., & Gretzel, U. (2012). Tourism in technology dead zones: Documenting experiential dimensions. International Journal of Tourism Sciences, 12(2): 1-20.
• Schlachter, S., McDowall, A. & Cropley, M. (2015). Staying “switched on” during non-work time: Reviewing consequences for employees', Division of Occupational Psychology Annual Conference.
Glasgow.
• Schmidt-Rauch, S., & Schwabe, G. (2013). Designing for mobile value co-creation: The case of travel counselling. Electronic Markets, 24(1): 5-17.
• Schwab, K. (2015). The fourth industrial revolution: What it means and how to respond, Foreign Affairs.
• See-To, E.W.K., & Ho, K.K.W. (2014). Value co-creation and purchase intention in social network sites: The role of electronic word-of-mouth and trust – A theoretical analysis. Computers in Human
Behavior, 31: 182-189.
• Smith, M. & Puczkó, L. (2009). Health and wellness tourism. London: Butterworth-Heinemann.
• Tanti, A. & Buhalis, D. (2016). Connectivity and the consequences of being (dis)connected. Information and communication technologies in tourism 2016. Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 31-44.
• Tussyadiah, I.P., & Fesenmaier, D.R. (2009). Mediating the tourist experiences: Access to places via shared videos. Annals of Tourism Research, 36(1): 24-40.
• Urry, J. & Larsen, J. (2011). The Tourist Gaze 3.0. London: SAGE Publications.
• Valcour, M. (2007). Work-based resources as moderators of the relationship between work hours and satisfaction with work-family balance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6): 1512-1523.
• Wang, D., Xiang, Z., & Fesenmaier, D.R. (2014a). Adapting to the mobile world: A model of smartphone use. Annals of Tourism Research, 48(0): 11-26.
• Wang, D., Xiang, Z., & Fesenmaier, D.R. (2014b). Smartphone use in everyday life and travel. Journal of Travel Research, 55(1): 52-63.
• White, N.R. & White, P.B. (2007). Home and Away: Tourists in a Connected World. Annals of Tourism Research, 34(1): 88–104.
• Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2009). Reciprocal relationships between job resources, personal resources, and work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior,
74: 235–244.
31. ENTER 2017 Research Track Slide Number 31
Adele Ladkin (Bournemouth University, UK)
Barbara Neuhofer, PhD
Senior Lecturer in Experience Design
Head of Experience Design
Innovation and Management in Tourism
Salzburg University of Applied Sciences
barbara.neuhofer@fh-salzburg.ac.at
www.barbaraneuhofer.com
Connect: Facebook I Academia I LinkedIn
THANK YOU