From “Data Shantytowns”
  to “Digital Urbanism”

 How to share and reuse data with
    transparency and security
             Gustavo Giorgetti
         gustavo.giorgetti@gmail.com
From the countryside to the city                                                           Ken Orr

   The Rural setting (1912)                     The urban setting (2012)




  OWN space (I don’t share)                   OWN and SHARED spaces
  Electricity, gas, water (self-sufficient)   Public services for electricity, gas, water (dependent)




             Living alone                                  Living with others
    I have to get on well with myself               I have to get on well with the others


                                                       Coexistence
The coexistence needs Rules… otherwise
But which rules to use …
without affecting individual rights?
As citizens, what do we share the most
              apart of space?
  Physical urbanism(space)                Digital urbanism (data)


• Territory                         →   • Accessible DATA
                                          from own sources

• Urbanism                              • Rules to allow to
  regulations                      →      share, audit and
  (rules to build)                        reuse DATA

• Public services                  →    • Digital Public
  (water, electricity, gas, security,     Services (connectivity,
   transport, etc.)                       authentication, log information,
                                          security, auditory, etc.)
Nowadays RULES to share data are inadequate…




                                     THE FOOTPRINTS
                                     OF CITIZENS’
                                     PILGRIMAGE




                                     GOVERNMENT
                                     BODIES.
Very nice theory, but about reality?
1. STOP PILGRIMAGE, STOP USING PHOTOCOPIES!

2. STOP QUEUING, WE WANT COMPLETE AND
  EFFICIENT PROCEEDINGS USING INTERNET!
3. I WANT TO DEAL WITH ALL MY PAPERWORK USING
  ONLY ONE PORTAL!
ESTONIA




          8
Estonia
Estonia
Estonia
NEUQUEN             e-fotocopia




                    e-agrimensor




Sala de Situación
Sec. Gestión Pública Pcia. de Neuquén

           Stages from Neuquén case study




             Fixing external   Redesigning internal
INITIAL       relationships                                   Reengineering of SOA
                                interdepartmental                 applications
 STATE    between Government       relationships
                  bodies
               DATA             PROCESSES                       SERVICES
Sec. Gestión Pública Pcia. de Neuquén
OPEN GOVERNMENT
                  Neuquén case study, Layers schema
   SERVICES
  PROCESSES
     DATA          Innovation Support
                   Reusability freedom (new uses)

                  Open Services




                  Redesigned processes




                  Shared databases from different government bodies
What achievements do we reach
        when defining adequate rules?
               Digital urbanism

Digital urbanism are rules to share DATA:
 Allow to REUSE data by means of 3 FREEDOM facilities:
  1. Freedom to share my data
  2. Freedom to control and audit legal use of my data
  3. Freedom to build new uses of my data

  Allows COEXISTENCE ALLOWING DIVERSITY:
  1. diversity of actors (public and private)
  2. diversity of developments (legacy and new ones)
  3. diversity of technologies (open and proprietary)
Related Links
 Estonia website where to find case studies and the employed model.
  http://e-estonia.com/case-studies
 INTEGRABILITY regulations, Resolution Number 220/10 from Province of Neuquén.
  http://www.segpyc.gov.ar/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/resolucion_220-10_anexo_i.pdf
 Ing. Rodolfo Laffite, Secretary of Public Administration, at the PoliTics Forum 2011.
  http://www.slideshare.net/ForoPoliTICs/panel-los-desafos-de-gobierno-frente-a-la-
  complejidad-20-por-rodolfo-laffitte
 From Connected Government to Connected Community Conference, 2012.
  http://www.neuquen.gob.ar/integrabilidad/
 Videos from YouTube at “GestionPublicaNqn” Channel.
 9th Digital Cities and Territories Forum 2012, Digital Urbanism Presentation, Author Ing.
  Rodolfo Laffitte http://www.slideshare.net/RodolfoEstebanLaffitte/rel-urbanismo-
  digitalbs-as20120608
thanks!

twitter: @Gus_Giorgetti
mail: gustavo.giorgetti@gmail.com
blog: http://paradigmazapatilla.wordpress.com

Digital urbanism city camp

  • 1.
    From “Data Shantytowns” to “Digital Urbanism” How to share and reuse data with transparency and security Gustavo Giorgetti gustavo.giorgetti@gmail.com
  • 2.
    From the countrysideto the city Ken Orr The Rural setting (1912) The urban setting (2012) OWN space (I don’t share) OWN and SHARED spaces Electricity, gas, water (self-sufficient) Public services for electricity, gas, water (dependent) Living alone Living with others I have to get on well with myself I have to get on well with the others Coexistence
  • 3.
    The coexistence needsRules… otherwise
  • 4.
    But which rulesto use … without affecting individual rights?
  • 5.
    As citizens, whatdo we share the most apart of space? Physical urbanism(space) Digital urbanism (data) • Territory → • Accessible DATA from own sources • Urbanism • Rules to allow to regulations → share, audit and (rules to build) reuse DATA • Public services → • Digital Public (water, electricity, gas, security, Services (connectivity, transport, etc.) authentication, log information, security, auditory, etc.)
  • 6.
    Nowadays RULES toshare data are inadequate… THE FOOTPRINTS OF CITIZENS’ PILGRIMAGE GOVERNMENT BODIES.
  • 7.
    Very nice theory,but about reality? 1. STOP PILGRIMAGE, STOP USING PHOTOCOPIES! 2. STOP QUEUING, WE WANT COMPLETE AND EFFICIENT PROCEEDINGS USING INTERNET! 3. I WANT TO DEAL WITH ALL MY PAPERWORK USING ONLY ONE PORTAL!
  • 8.
  • 9.
  • 10.
  • 11.
  • 12.
    NEUQUEN e-fotocopia e-agrimensor Sala de Situación
  • 13.
    Sec. Gestión PúblicaPcia. de Neuquén Stages from Neuquén case study Fixing external Redesigning internal INITIAL relationships Reengineering of SOA interdepartmental applications STATE between Government relationships bodies DATA PROCESSES SERVICES
  • 14.
    Sec. Gestión PúblicaPcia. de Neuquén OPEN GOVERNMENT Neuquén case study, Layers schema SERVICES PROCESSES DATA Innovation Support Reusability freedom (new uses) Open Services Redesigned processes Shared databases from different government bodies
  • 15.
    What achievements dowe reach when defining adequate rules? Digital urbanism Digital urbanism are rules to share DATA: Allow to REUSE data by means of 3 FREEDOM facilities: 1. Freedom to share my data 2. Freedom to control and audit legal use of my data 3. Freedom to build new uses of my data Allows COEXISTENCE ALLOWING DIVERSITY: 1. diversity of actors (public and private) 2. diversity of developments (legacy and new ones) 3. diversity of technologies (open and proprietary)
  • 16.
    Related Links  Estoniawebsite where to find case studies and the employed model. http://e-estonia.com/case-studies  INTEGRABILITY regulations, Resolution Number 220/10 from Province of Neuquén. http://www.segpyc.gov.ar/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/resolucion_220-10_anexo_i.pdf  Ing. Rodolfo Laffite, Secretary of Public Administration, at the PoliTics Forum 2011. http://www.slideshare.net/ForoPoliTICs/panel-los-desafos-de-gobierno-frente-a-la- complejidad-20-por-rodolfo-laffitte  From Connected Government to Connected Community Conference, 2012. http://www.neuquen.gob.ar/integrabilidad/  Videos from YouTube at “GestionPublicaNqn” Channel.  9th Digital Cities and Territories Forum 2012, Digital Urbanism Presentation, Author Ing. Rodolfo Laffitte http://www.slideshare.net/RodolfoEstebanLaffitte/rel-urbanismo- digitalbs-as20120608
  • 17.