INLAY
IMPRESSION AND COMPARISON OF Different INLAYS
CONVENTIONAL IMPRESSION-Retraction
cord technique
 The most common impression materials used for the indirect casting
technique are the polyvinyl siloxanes (addition reaction silicones).
 Gingival retraction is to widen the gingival sulcus to provide access for the
impression material to reach the subgingival margins in adequate bulk to
resist tearing during impression withdrawal
 Profound local anesthesia substantially reduces salivation to facilitate a dry
field and allows tissue retraction without patient discomfort
Impression
 Polyvinyl siloxane impressions can withstand disinfection routines without
significant distortion
 Two types of trays, commercial stock and custom made, are suitable. Use of
stock, plastic trays is convenient and saves time.
 A thickness of impression material greater than 3 mm increases shrinkage and
the chance of voids; a thickness less than 2 mm may lead to distortion or tear
of the impression material
MAKING IMPRESSION
 Use the first dispenser to mix and fill the impression tray with the heavy-bodied impression material .
 Now use the second dispenser to mix and inject the light-bodied impression material on the prepared
teeth
 The teeth should be examined to ensure that the field is still clean and dry.
 . Gently remove the retraction cord with operative pliers.
 All preparation surfaces should be clean, dry, and exposed to view.

USE OF LIGHT BODY
 Next, deliberately and progressively (moving from distal to mesial) fill the
opened gingival sulci and preparations over and beyond the margins with
material from the syringe.

 To avoid trapping air, the tip is kept directly on the gingival and pulpal walls,
filling the preparations from gingival to occlusal, and the flow is regulated so
that material is not extruded too fast ahead of the tip.
 Light-bodied material also is injected on the occlusal surfaces of the
unprepared adjacent teeth to eliminate the trapping of air on the occlusal
grooves
REMOVAL OF TRAY
 After filling and covering the teeth with material from the syringe,
immediately remove the cotton rolls and seat the loaded tray over the region
 After filling and covering the teeth with material from the syringe,
immediately remove the cotton rolls and seat the loaded tray over the region
 Removal is aided by inserting a fingertip at the junction of the facial border
of the impression and the vestibule fornix
CAD/CAM Techniques for inlay
 Tooth preparations for CAD/CAM inlays must reflect the capabilities of the CAD software and
hardware and the CAM milling devices that fabricate the restorations.
 CEREC system automatically “blocks out” any undercuts during the optical impression, large
undercuts should be avoided.
 This system eliminates the need for a conventional impression, provisional restoration, and
multiple patient appointments.
Cad cam Inlays
 The tooth preparation will have a major impact on the fit
accuracy of the milled restoration.
 Cavity preparations for CAD/CAM inlays are similar to those for
conventional indirect ceramic inlays.
 . The occlusal aspect of the preparation should be at least 1.5
mm thick in the central fissure and 2.0 mm thick over the cusps
to provide adequate strength for the ceramic restoration.
 All cavosurface margins should be well defined and have a 90-
degree butt-joint configuration.
SUMMIT
CADCAM Inlays
 This will allow the camera to record an accurate image of
the cavosurface margin while providing strength to the
restoration.
 Bevels and knife-edge margins should not be used.
 The cavity walls of the proximal box should have at least 6
to 8 degrees of divergent taper.

 All preparation floors should be smooth but not necessarily
flat.
SUMMIT
Metal vs Composite vs ceramic
Metal CERAMIC composite
INDICATIONS
1. .Extensive tooth loss, Correction
of occlusion
2. Large class 2
3. Restoration of endodontically
treated teeth
4. Longevity and durability
5. Preexisting cast metal
restorations
CONTRAINDICATIONS
6. Occlusal disharmony
7. Aesthetics
1.ESTHETICS
2.Moderate sized cavities
3]When precise fit and strength needed
1]Heavy occlusal forces
2] Inability to maintain a dry field.
3] Deep subgingival preparation.
1.ESTHETICS
2. WORN-OUT TOOTH
3]Limited occlusal stresses
4]Isolation
1]BRUXISM
2]ALLERGY
Metal CERAMIC composite
ADVANTAGES
1.Greater tensile strength
2.Precise reproduction of the form
and minute details
3.Metal alloys used are tarnish and
corrosion resistant
4. Finishing and polishing can be
done outside the oral cavity, thus
preventing damage to the pulp
DISADVANTAGES
1. Leakage around and under the
restorations through the
cement- restoration - tooth
junction
2.It involves extensive tooth
preparation
3.Technique sensitive
4. Galvanic deterioration
1]Wear resistance—Ceramic
restorations are more wear
resistant than direct composite
restorations.
Ability to strengthen remaining
tooth structure
3]More precise control of contours
and contacts
4]Biocompatibility and good tissue
response
1]Brittleness of ceramics.
2]Wear of opposing dentition and
restoration.
4]Low potential for repair
1]Bonding and reinforcement
2]Reduced sensitivity
3]Repairability
4]Conservative tooth preparation
5]Biocompatibility
1]Durability
2]Staining and discolouration
3]less lifespan
4]technique sensitive
5]limited strength in large
restorations
Cast gold usually made of
copper, silver, platinum, nickel,
zinc
Gold offers high strength and
durability.
They are more suitable for
posterior teeth where
esthetics are not a primary
concern
Ceramic restorations, also
known as porcelain
restorations, are made of
dental-grade ceramic
materials.
They are generally not as
strong as metal restorations.
They are highly esthetic and
are commonly used in the
front teeth.
Resin composite restorations
are made of a mixture of
plastic (composite resin) and
fine glass particles
They are generally not as
strong as ceramics or metals.
They offer excellent esthetics
and are commonly used in
both front and back teeth.
Metal CERAMIC composite
LUTING CEMENT:
Zinc phosphate cement provides
good retention and is particularly
useful for cast gold restorations
due to its ability to bond to both
metal and tooth
structure[Donovan and Cho, 1999]
TOOTH PREPERATION:
Bevel is needed
For Metal inlays, a slight
divergence or taper of 2 to 5
degrees is required
Occlusal Reduction:1-1.5 mm
Resin cements are widely used for
luting ceramic restorations due to
their excellent adhesive properties
and esthetics
Bevel is usually not recommended
The divergence angle of more
than[ 2 to 5]. helps ensure a
secure fit and stability of the
restoration within the tooth
preparation
1.5 to 2mm.
Resin cements used for composite
inlays are typically dual-cured or
light-cured
[el-Mowafy et al. ]
Bevel not needed.
The divergence angle of [more
than 2 to 5 degrees] same as
ceramic
1.5 to 2mm
Cast gold CERAMIC composite
Biocompatibility is good
ADAPTABILITY
Gold restorations are more
adaptable
LONGEVITY
Metal restorations known for
their durability [Leempoel et al. ]
TYPE OF TOOTH PREP
Metal restorations usually require
less tooth removal compared to
ceramics
Dental ceramics are generally
biocompatible
Ceramics are difficult to adapt
Ceramic restorations are known
for their excellent long-term
durability[Wendt SL etal]
Ceramic restorations may
require more tooth structure
removal
They are also biocompatible
Composites are also difficult to
adapt
They tend to have a shorter
lifespan compared to ceramic
restorations. [Taylor DF, et al]
Resin composite restorations
require less tooth structure
removal
Cast gold CERAMIC composite
Isthmus width is to be 1 to 1.5 mm Ceramic systems require that any
isthmus be at least 2 mm wide to
decrease the possibility of fracture
of the restoration.
Composite also require 2mm
isthmus width
DIRECT VS INDIRECT INLAYS
Feature Direct Inlay Indirect Inlay
Visits Required One Two or more
Material Strength Moderate High (ceramic, gold, etc.)
Fit Accuracy Moderate Excellent
Aesthetic Options Good (composite) Excellent (porcelain/zirconia)
Cost Lower Higher
Durability Fair to good Excellent
Technique Chairside, fast Lab/CAD-CAM-based
Ideal Use Small to moderate restorations
Larger restorations or high stress
areas
CAD/CAM
 Different types of ceramics are available for chairside CAD/CAM
restoration fabrication.
 These include the feldspathic glass ceramics Vitablocs Mark II
(Vident, Brea, CA) and CEREC Blocs (Sirona, manufactured by Vita
Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany).
 The ceramic blocks are available in various shades and opacities,
and some are even layered to mimic the relative opacity or
translucency in different areas of a tooth.
Impression
 Gingival retraction cord can be used to reflect the gingival tissues away from the tooth structure thus
providing access to the impression material to reach the subgingival margins.
 Tooth-colored inlay systems require an elastomeric or optical impression of the prepared tooth and the
adjacent teeth and interocclusal records, which allow the restoration to be fabricated on a working
cast in the laboratory.
 With chairside CAD/CAM systems, no working cast is necessary.
CAD/CAM
 CAD/CAM systems are expensive laboratory-based
units requiring the submission of an elastomeric or
digital impression of the prepared tooth.
 The CEREC system was the first commercially
available CAD/CAM system developed for the rapid
chairside design and fabrication of ceramic
restorations.

DIFFERENT TYPES OF INLAY COMPARISON AND IMPRESSION MAKING

  • 1.
  • 2.
    CONVENTIONAL IMPRESSION-Retraction cord technique The most common impression materials used for the indirect casting technique are the polyvinyl siloxanes (addition reaction silicones).  Gingival retraction is to widen the gingival sulcus to provide access for the impression material to reach the subgingival margins in adequate bulk to resist tearing during impression withdrawal  Profound local anesthesia substantially reduces salivation to facilitate a dry field and allows tissue retraction without patient discomfort
  • 4.
    Impression  Polyvinyl siloxaneimpressions can withstand disinfection routines without significant distortion  Two types of trays, commercial stock and custom made, are suitable. Use of stock, plastic trays is convenient and saves time.  A thickness of impression material greater than 3 mm increases shrinkage and the chance of voids; a thickness less than 2 mm may lead to distortion or tear of the impression material
  • 5.
    MAKING IMPRESSION  Usethe first dispenser to mix and fill the impression tray with the heavy-bodied impression material .  Now use the second dispenser to mix and inject the light-bodied impression material on the prepared teeth  The teeth should be examined to ensure that the field is still clean and dry.  . Gently remove the retraction cord with operative pliers.  All preparation surfaces should be clean, dry, and exposed to view. 
  • 6.
    USE OF LIGHTBODY  Next, deliberately and progressively (moving from distal to mesial) fill the opened gingival sulci and preparations over and beyond the margins with material from the syringe.   To avoid trapping air, the tip is kept directly on the gingival and pulpal walls, filling the preparations from gingival to occlusal, and the flow is regulated so that material is not extruded too fast ahead of the tip.  Light-bodied material also is injected on the occlusal surfaces of the unprepared adjacent teeth to eliminate the trapping of air on the occlusal grooves
  • 7.
    REMOVAL OF TRAY After filling and covering the teeth with material from the syringe, immediately remove the cotton rolls and seat the loaded tray over the region  After filling and covering the teeth with material from the syringe, immediately remove the cotton rolls and seat the loaded tray over the region  Removal is aided by inserting a fingertip at the junction of the facial border of the impression and the vestibule fornix
  • 10.
    CAD/CAM Techniques forinlay  Tooth preparations for CAD/CAM inlays must reflect the capabilities of the CAD software and hardware and the CAM milling devices that fabricate the restorations.  CEREC system automatically “blocks out” any undercuts during the optical impression, large undercuts should be avoided.  This system eliminates the need for a conventional impression, provisional restoration, and multiple patient appointments.
  • 11.
    Cad cam Inlays The tooth preparation will have a major impact on the fit accuracy of the milled restoration.  Cavity preparations for CAD/CAM inlays are similar to those for conventional indirect ceramic inlays.  . The occlusal aspect of the preparation should be at least 1.5 mm thick in the central fissure and 2.0 mm thick over the cusps to provide adequate strength for the ceramic restoration.  All cavosurface margins should be well defined and have a 90- degree butt-joint configuration. SUMMIT
  • 12.
    CADCAM Inlays  Thiswill allow the camera to record an accurate image of the cavosurface margin while providing strength to the restoration.  Bevels and knife-edge margins should not be used.  The cavity walls of the proximal box should have at least 6 to 8 degrees of divergent taper.   All preparation floors should be smooth but not necessarily flat. SUMMIT
  • 16.
  • 17.
    Metal CERAMIC composite INDICATIONS 1..Extensive tooth loss, Correction of occlusion 2. Large class 2 3. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth 4. Longevity and durability 5. Preexisting cast metal restorations CONTRAINDICATIONS 6. Occlusal disharmony 7. Aesthetics 1.ESTHETICS 2.Moderate sized cavities 3]When precise fit and strength needed 1]Heavy occlusal forces 2] Inability to maintain a dry field. 3] Deep subgingival preparation. 1.ESTHETICS 2. WORN-OUT TOOTH 3]Limited occlusal stresses 4]Isolation 1]BRUXISM 2]ALLERGY
  • 18.
    Metal CERAMIC composite ADVANTAGES 1.Greatertensile strength 2.Precise reproduction of the form and minute details 3.Metal alloys used are tarnish and corrosion resistant 4. Finishing and polishing can be done outside the oral cavity, thus preventing damage to the pulp DISADVANTAGES 1. Leakage around and under the restorations through the cement- restoration - tooth junction 2.It involves extensive tooth preparation 3.Technique sensitive 4. Galvanic deterioration 1]Wear resistance—Ceramic restorations are more wear resistant than direct composite restorations. Ability to strengthen remaining tooth structure 3]More precise control of contours and contacts 4]Biocompatibility and good tissue response 1]Brittleness of ceramics. 2]Wear of opposing dentition and restoration. 4]Low potential for repair 1]Bonding and reinforcement 2]Reduced sensitivity 3]Repairability 4]Conservative tooth preparation 5]Biocompatibility 1]Durability 2]Staining and discolouration 3]less lifespan 4]technique sensitive 5]limited strength in large restorations
  • 19.
    Cast gold usuallymade of copper, silver, platinum, nickel, zinc Gold offers high strength and durability. They are more suitable for posterior teeth where esthetics are not a primary concern Ceramic restorations, also known as porcelain restorations, are made of dental-grade ceramic materials. They are generally not as strong as metal restorations. They are highly esthetic and are commonly used in the front teeth. Resin composite restorations are made of a mixture of plastic (composite resin) and fine glass particles They are generally not as strong as ceramics or metals. They offer excellent esthetics and are commonly used in both front and back teeth. Metal CERAMIC composite LUTING CEMENT: Zinc phosphate cement provides good retention and is particularly useful for cast gold restorations due to its ability to bond to both metal and tooth structure[Donovan and Cho, 1999] TOOTH PREPERATION: Bevel is needed For Metal inlays, a slight divergence or taper of 2 to 5 degrees is required Occlusal Reduction:1-1.5 mm Resin cements are widely used for luting ceramic restorations due to their excellent adhesive properties and esthetics Bevel is usually not recommended The divergence angle of more than[ 2 to 5]. helps ensure a secure fit and stability of the restoration within the tooth preparation 1.5 to 2mm. Resin cements used for composite inlays are typically dual-cured or light-cured [el-Mowafy et al. ] Bevel not needed. The divergence angle of [more than 2 to 5 degrees] same as ceramic 1.5 to 2mm
  • 20.
    Cast gold CERAMICcomposite Biocompatibility is good ADAPTABILITY Gold restorations are more adaptable LONGEVITY Metal restorations known for their durability [Leempoel et al. ] TYPE OF TOOTH PREP Metal restorations usually require less tooth removal compared to ceramics Dental ceramics are generally biocompatible Ceramics are difficult to adapt Ceramic restorations are known for their excellent long-term durability[Wendt SL etal] Ceramic restorations may require more tooth structure removal They are also biocompatible Composites are also difficult to adapt They tend to have a shorter lifespan compared to ceramic restorations. [Taylor DF, et al] Resin composite restorations require less tooth structure removal
  • 21.
    Cast gold CERAMICcomposite Isthmus width is to be 1 to 1.5 mm Ceramic systems require that any isthmus be at least 2 mm wide to decrease the possibility of fracture of the restoration. Composite also require 2mm isthmus width
  • 27.
  • 28.
    Feature Direct InlayIndirect Inlay Visits Required One Two or more Material Strength Moderate High (ceramic, gold, etc.) Fit Accuracy Moderate Excellent Aesthetic Options Good (composite) Excellent (porcelain/zirconia) Cost Lower Higher Durability Fair to good Excellent Technique Chairside, fast Lab/CAD-CAM-based Ideal Use Small to moderate restorations Larger restorations or high stress areas
  • 29.
    CAD/CAM  Different typesof ceramics are available for chairside CAD/CAM restoration fabrication.  These include the feldspathic glass ceramics Vitablocs Mark II (Vident, Brea, CA) and CEREC Blocs (Sirona, manufactured by Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany).  The ceramic blocks are available in various shades and opacities, and some are even layered to mimic the relative opacity or translucency in different areas of a tooth.
  • 30.
    Impression  Gingival retractioncord can be used to reflect the gingival tissues away from the tooth structure thus providing access to the impression material to reach the subgingival margins.  Tooth-colored inlay systems require an elastomeric or optical impression of the prepared tooth and the adjacent teeth and interocclusal records, which allow the restoration to be fabricated on a working cast in the laboratory.  With chairside CAD/CAM systems, no working cast is necessary.
  • 31.
    CAD/CAM  CAD/CAM systemsare expensive laboratory-based units requiring the submission of an elastomeric or digital impression of the prepared tooth.  The CEREC system was the first commercially available CAD/CAM system developed for the rapid chairside design and fabrication of ceramic restorations.