SlideShare a Scribd company logo
See	discussions,	stats,	and	author	profiles	for	this	publication	at:	https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235692369
Water	and	Cation	Movement	in	an	Indonesian
Ultisol
DATASET		in		AGRONOMY	JOURNAL	·	JULY	1997
Impact	Factor:	1.44	·	DOI:	10.2134/agronj1997.00021962008900040007x
CITATIONS
23
READS
25
3	AUTHORS,	INCLUDING:
Russell	Yost
University	of	Hawaiʻi	at	Mānoa
189	PUBLICATIONS			2,159	CITATIONS			
SEE	PROFILE
Available	from:	Russell	Yost
Retrieved	on:	23	January	2016
Water and Cation Movementin an Indonesian Ultisol
ThomasS Dierolf, Lalit M. Arya, and Russell S. Yost*
ABSTRACT
Limeandfertilizer are requiredto overcomeacidity andsoil fertility
constraints to cropproductionin the highly weatheredsoils of Sitiung,
Indonesia. The potential leaching of soil amendmentsis enhancedby
the high annual rainfall of 2750 mmand the low effective cation
exchange capacity (ECEC)of these soils. Thepurpose of this study
wasto understand the relationship of soil water hydrology to the
fate of applied soil amendments.Internal soil waterdrainage (field-
measured) andsoil moisture release curves (field- andlaboratory-
measured)weredeterminedto characterize the soil hydraulic proper-
ties of a clayey, kaolinitic, isohyperthermicTypic Kanhapludult.The
results indicated that 6 h after the application of 72.5 mmof water
during a ]00-min period, water equivalent to nearly 94%of the applied
water drained to depths below 112.5 cm. Macroporevolumeaccounted
for 26 to 40%of the total porosity of the top 22.5 cmof soil and5
to 7%in the 22.5- to 112.5-cm depth. Cation movementwas measured
during a 2-yr period in a field experimentthat examinedthe effects
of various rates andtimingof K fertilization (and blanket applications
of Ca and Mg)and stover removal on soil K, Ca, and Mgpools.
Results show that amountsequivalent to 1%of the K, 5%of the Ca,
and24%of the Mgthat were applied as fertilizer nutrients accumu-
lated in the 30- to 90-cmdepth. Anaverage of 33%of the K, 26%
of the Ca, and8%of the Mgapplied as fertilizers werenot accounted
for in the soil or by crop biomass and probably leached below the
90-cmdepth. Weconclude that is difficult to chemically ameliorate
the subsoil below the 30-cm depth and hypothesize that macropore
flow through the soil and a continually wet subsoil are the major
factors limiting subsoil cation accumulation.
Basic CA37~ONSare usually lowin the highly weathered,
acid soils of the humidtropics and replenishing the
soil cation pool with lime and fertilizers is relatively
costly. Improperly managedagricultural systems result
in the inefficient use or loss of soil cations through
excessive removal in biomass and from leaching losses
(Gill and Kamprath, 1990; Wonget al., 1992). In some
cases, base cation leaching is desirable whenthe depth
of rooting of Al-sensitive crops is limited by a high Al-
saturated subsoil. Calciumaccumulation can reduce the
effects of subsoil acidity, thus allowing deeper crop root
growth to tap subsoil water during periods of surface
soil moisture deficit (Ritchey et al., 1980).
Cation Leaching from the Zone of Application
The amountand degree of cation leaching in soils of
the humidtropics ranges widely and reflects the various
factors that control leaching. For example, Ca move-
ment is promoted by applying Ca in forms that include
a mobile anion, such as CaSO4or CaCI2, rather than as
T.S. Dierolf, Jalan KehakimanNo. 283, Bukittinggi, West Sumatra,
Indonesia 26136; L.M. Arya, 3455 Lebon Rd., Apt. 1535, San Diego,
CA;R.S. Yost, Dep. of .Agronomyand Soil Science, Univ. of Hawaii,
Honolulu, HI 96822. Worksupported by the Ctr. for Soil and Agrocli-
mate Res. (CSAR), Bogor, Indonesia, and the Soil ManagementCol-
laborative Res. Support Program (USAID). Received 29 Apr. 1996.
*Corresponding author (rsyost@hawaii.edu).
Published in Agron. J. 89:572-579 (1997).
CaCO3 (Ritchey et al., 1980), and by the addition
acidifying N fertilizers (Pearson et al., 1962). The
amount of cumulative rainfall and drainage has been
related to the decrease in surface-soil cations (Cahnet
al., 1993;Ayarzaet al., 1991). Significant leaching losses
are likely to occur only if the soil ion exchangecapacity
is exceeded, as whenlarge amountsof cations are added
in fertilizers (Friesen et al., 1982; Gill and Kamprath,
1990). Cropped plots reportedly showedreduced cation
leaching as compared with bare plots, presumably be-
cause of the effect of plants on soil drying (reducing
drainage) and nutrient recycling (Wonget al., 1992).
Subsoil Cation Accumulation
Reports of subsoil cation accumulation seem to pre-
dominate from regions with ustic soil moisture regimes
or where substantial subsoil drying can occur. In sepa-
rate studies on a clayey Typic Haplustox in Brazil, K
accumulated to depths of 75 cm (Souza et al., 1979;
Fageria et al., 1990), and Ca and Mgcontents increased
to a depth of 75 cm(Ritchey et al., 1980). Almost all
of the limestone wasaccounted for in the surface 60 cm
in the latter study. Poss and Saragoni (1992) reported
Mgaccumulated to a depth of 80 cm in a sandy Typic
Eutrustox in Togo. On a clayey Typic Haplorthox in
Puerto Rico, Ca and Mgaccumulated in the 45- to 60-
cmdepth by 2 yr after application of high rates of CaCO3
and (NH4)2SO4 (Pearson et al., 1962).
Mixedresults are reported from soils with udic mois-
ture regimes. Soil K did not increase below 30 cmin a
clayey Typic Haplorthox in Indonesia (Gill and Kam-
prath, 1990). Theauthors reported that K equivalent to
24%of the 480 kg K ha-1 applied was leached to below
the 90-cmdepth. Fifteen years of continuous cropping
and fertilization of a Typic Paleudult in Yurimaguas,
Peru, resulted in an increase of Ca and Mgonly to
the 20- to 40-cm depth (Alegre and Sanchez, 1991).
However, Ayarza et al. (1991) reported that 2700
of rain wassufficient to accumulateK in the 60- to 100-
cm depth of a fine-loamy Typic Paleudult from Yurima-
guas. Theywere able to account for the entire applica-
tion amount of 150 kg K ha-1 within the surface 100
cm.Friesen et al. (1982)calculated that nearly all of the
Ca contained in as much as 4 MgCa(OH)2 -I was
recovered in the surface 90 cmof soil by 3 yr after liming
a coarse-textured Typic Paleudult in Nigeria.
Macropore Flow and Subsoil Water Status
Well-structured soils, whichare characteristic of Siti-
ung, Indonesia, often exhibit macropore water flow
(Anderson and Bouma, 1977). Macropore flow allows
percolating water to pass through the soil without com-
pletely displacing the resident soil water contained in
micropores (Beven and Germann, 1982). Water flowing
Abbreviations: ECEC,effective cation exchange capacity.
572
DIEROLF ET AL.: WATERANDCATION MOVEMENTIN AN INDONESIANULTISOL 573
in saturated macropores can movesolutes into unsatu-
rated micropores, whereas saturated micropores will
largely, except for somediffusion, be bypassed by the
water and solutes (Youngs and Leeds-Harrison, 1990).
Thus, the degree of micropore saturation in the subsoil
can influence the movementof drainage water and sol-
utes, and maypartly explain the range of results on
subsoil cation accumulation discussed in the previous
section. For example, if a subsoil is dry, and the micro-
pores are not filled with water, it is possible that water
carrying cations from the surface layer will enter these
pores and result in subsoil cation accumulation.
The Brazilian savanna, where the Oxisols mentioned
previously are located (Souza et al., 1979; Ritchey et
al., 1980; Fageria et al,, 1990), undergoesa 3- to 6-too
dry period that encourages drying out of the subsoil.
Similarly, the subsoil of the Oxisol from Puerto Rico
(Pearson et al., 1962) can dry to the permanentwilting
point (Bouldin, 1979). The subsoil cation accumulation
reported at both sites may have been promoted by a
relatively dry subsoil that allowedfor water and nutrient
movementinto subsoil micropore space.
In contrast, the Oxisols and Ultisols of Peru (Alegre
and Sanchez, 1991; Ayarzaet al., 1991), Indonesia (Gill
and Kamprath,1990), and Nigeria (Friesen et al., 1982),
referred to previously, have an udic moisture regime
with an evenly distributed annual rainfall. The mixed
results on subsoil cation accumulation reported from
these areas maybe a result of the effect that subsoil
texture and structure can have on subsoil drying. For
example, the clayey subsoil of an Ultisol in Indonesia
that is similar to and geographically near to the one
reported on by Gill and Kamprath (1990) maintained
a high pore saturation even during an uncommon36-d
drought (Arya et al., 1992). Thecoarse-textured Ultisol
in Nigeria (Friesen et al., 1982) mayhave allowed for
moresubsoil drying, thus letting water and nutrients
moveinto the subsoil micropore space.
The previously mentioned reports emphasized the
movementand accumulation of cations, but they did
not provide detailed information on the nature of water
flow through the respective soil. Ourobjective was to
characterize water movementin a highly weathered soil
of the humidtropics and to relate this to the movement
and subsoil accumulation of basic cations in a 2-yr
field experiment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Site Characteristics
Field experimentswereconductednear the village of Siti-
ung1A,WestSumatra,Indonesia(102° E, 1° S). Therainforest
originally coveringthe site wascut and cleared by bulldozer
in 1976.Afterthree seasonsof rice (Oryzasativa L.), the field
wasfallowedand then becamedominatedby alang-alanggrass
[Imperatacylindrica (L.) Raeusch.]. Thealang-alang was
sprayedwith herbicide andthen cut and removed.Thesurface
15 cmwas plowed and alang-alang roots were removed. A
soil pedonin an adjacent,unplowedarea wastentatively classi-
fied as a clayey, kaolinitic, isohyperthermicTypicKanhaplu-
dult (Table1). Initial levels of extractablecations fromsoil
of a nearbyexperimentwere(in cmolckg-1) 0.73 Ca, 0.18 K,
0.29 Mg,and 4.63 AI+Hfor the surface 15 cm,and 0.25 Ca,
0.05 K, 0.07 Mg,and 4.01 AI+Hfor the 15- to 30-cmdepth.
Surfacesoil organicCwas27.1 g kg-1, andpHwas4.9 in H20
and 3.9 in 1 MKC1.Rainfall ranges from 2500to 3000mm
yr-~ and averages morethan 200mmper monthfrom October
to May,and from 100 to 200 mmfrom June to September.
Internal Drainage
Internal drainagewasmeasuredin a 17.2m2 plot delineated
with plastic sheeting to a depth of 1.5 m. Twodiagonally
opposed quadrants were each instrumented with a neutron
probeaccess tube and tensiometersinstalled at depths from
7.5 to 120cmin 15-cmdepth increments. Theneutron probe
wascalibrated in both an emptyand a full water tank to
determinethe slope of the regression equation for relating
neutroncountto volumetricwatercontent (0). Theintercept
of the equation wascalculated fromthe soil core-measured
bulk density and fromthe gravimetric water content of soil
that wassampledwhile taking neutron counts.
Theplot wasirrigated with 71 mmof water 2 d before
the drainage test, to ensure maximumwetnessand moisture
uniformity.For the test, the plot wasirrigated with 72.5mm
of waterappliedwith sprinklingcansduringa 100-minperiod.
After irrigation ceased, the plot surface wascoveredwith a
plastic sheet anda shelter. Valuesof 0 at depthsfrom7.5 to
112.5 cmwere measuredwith a neutron probe. The0 of the
0- to 7.5-cmdepth wasdeterminedfromperiodic gravimetric
sampling.Soil matric potential wasmeasuredwith a portable
transducer. Tensiometer and neutron probe readings were
takenat several-minuteintervals initially andthen less fre-
quentlyup to 963h after irrigation ceased.
Total water content for a soil layer wasdetermined by
multiplyingthe volumetricwater content by the layer thick-
ness. Total water fromthe soil surface to a soil depth z was
obtained by summingthe total water content for each of the
Table 1. Soil profile description for the study soil, near the village of Sitiung, WestSumatra,Indonesia.~"
Horizon Depth Color Texture~
Particlesize][
Structure§ sand clay
cm
A 0- 12 10YR3/4 sicl
Btl 12- 35 10YR4/4 d
Bt2 35- 72 7.SYR4/4 cl
Bt3 72- 97 7.SYR4/6 cl
Bt4 97-143 5YR518 d
Bt5 143-160 5YR518 cl
ffm sbk 8 62
f/m sbk 11 66
f/m sbk 6 73
f/m sbk 7 65
ffm sbk 7 54
ffm sbk 7 52
"~ Dataprovidedby the Ctr. for Soil andAgroclimateRes. (CSAR),Bogor, Indonesia.
~:si, silty;ci, clay.
§ f, fine; m, medium;sbk, subangularblocky.
][ Pipette methodafter sonification in sodiumhexametaphosphate.
574 AGRONOMYJOURNAL,VOL.89, JULY-AUGUST1997
soil layers to depth z. Hydraulic conductivities at the various
depths were calculated by combining Darcy’s law and the
equation of continuity (Hillel et al., 1972) with computed
values of volumetric water content and soil matric potential.
Waterfluxes were calculated from changes in total water con-
tent with time or drainage curves. The volumetric water con-
tent at field capacity for each depth interval wasdetermined
from curves fit to the change in volumetric water content with
time. The drained-pore volumeat field capacity was used to
estimate the macroporosity. A similar approach has been used
on soil cores (Germannand Beven, 1981). Our definition
macroporosity probably also includes somemesopores, which
Luxmoore(1981) defined as pores which hold water between
-0.3 and -30 kPa.
Soil Moisture Release Curves
Watercontents for matric potentials -< 100 kPa were deter-
minedon field samples. Soil cores were sampledat soil depths
of 10, 25, and 60 cm, adjacent to tensiometers that were in-
stalled at the respective depth. Undisturbed soil cores (77 mrn
in diam., by 40 mmhigh) were sampled at midpoint depths
of 2, 10, 25, and 60 cmand were placed in pressure chambers
to measure water contents at matric potentials up to -400
kPa. Macroporosity wasalso estimated from the soil moisture
release curve by determining the volumetric water content at
the soil matric potential measuredat field capacity during the
internal drainage experiment.
Potassium Management Experiment
A field experiment was conducted to quantify the changes
in soil cation pools as affected by various stover management
and Kfertilization managementpractices. Arange of K inputs
and outputs was obtained in the soil system by varying KC1
applications and by either removingor returning crop biomass.
Nine treatments were arranged in a randomized complete
block design with four replications (Table 2). Plots measured
42 m2, with a 12 m2 harvest area. Basal fertilizers totaling (in
kg ha-~) 170 P (as TSP), 240 N (as urea), 46 Mg(as MgSO4),
10 Zn (as ZnSO4), and 15 B (as borate) were applied during
the experiment. Calcium carbonate to reduce A1 saturation
to 25%(1.3 to 2.7 IVlg ha-1, dependingon individual plot soil
analyses) wasapplied before the first crop and an additional
2 Mgha-a was applied before the sixth crop. Basal lime and
fertilizer treatments were incorporated into the surface 15 cm
of soil.
Six crops (cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]--cowpea-
rice-soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]-rice-soybean) were
grown in sequence from May 1989 to May 1991. Nutrient
removalin harvested grain and stover wascalculated by multi-
plying percent composition by dry weight of the respective
fractions. Soil samples were taken (five 10-cm-diam.cores per
Table 2. Treatmentsfor the Kmanagementexperiment.
Treatment Total K Application Stover
code applied timing-~ management
kg Kha-t
1 70 single returned
2 250 single returned
3 250 split returned
4 600 split returned
5 70 single removed
6 250 single removed
7 250 split removed
8 600 split removed
9~ 215 split removed
Single,all fertilizerwasappliedtothefirstcrop.Split,fertilizerwassplit
over sev/eral crops.
150kgKha-~ appliedas KCIfertilizer, remainderappliedas cattle
manure.
66
"E64
6O
-0.4017Ln(x)+64.154
0.9032
200 400 600 800 1000
Time(hours)
Fig. 1. Drainagecurveshowingtotal watercontentfor the0 to 112.5-
cmdepthas a functionof timefrom0.07to 963h after irrigation
with72.5 mmof waterduringa 100-rainperiod(symbolsrepresent
tworeplications).
plot) before fertilizing the first crop and after harvesting the
final crop in 15-cmincrements to a depth of 90 cm.
Extractable soil cation values were converted to massequiv-
alents (kg ha-~) by using the respective bulk densities. The
cation accumulation for a depth increment was calculated as
the difference between initial and final soil mass equivalent
values. The amountof applied cation that was not recovered
within the 90-cmdepth or in harvested biomass (D) was calcu-
lated using D = a - b - c, where a is the total amount of
cation applied as fertilizer, b is the amountof cation removed
in harvested biomass, and c is the cation accumulation within
the 0- to 90-cmdepth. Aseparate laboratory incubation study
determined that less than 10%of K added as fertilizer KCI
to this soil taken from the 0- to 15- and 15- to 30-cmdepths
may not be recovered by 1 MNH4OAcextraction (Dierolf,
1992). Thus, to simplify the discussion, we assumedthat all
of the K, Ca, and Mgnot recovered in the soil (c) or accounted
for in crop removal (b), was lost to leaching (D).
Cations were extracted from soil samples with 1 M
NHaOAc.The soil extracts were analyzed for cations by atomic
absorption spectrophotometry. The harvest fraction of each
crop was analyzed for nutrient content by the University of
Hawaii’s Agricultural Diagnostic Services Center. Samples
were dry ashed at 550°C and nutrients were determined by
inductively coupled plasma emission spectrometry. Linear re-
gression and analysis of variance were conducted using the
Statistix analytical software(Statistix, 1992).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Hydraulic Properties
Water Drainage
The total soil water content in the 0- to 112.5-cm
depth decreased sharply within 6 h after the 100-min
Table3. Drainageof water fromthe 0- to 112.5-cmsoil depth
for several times (t) after the applicationof 72.5 mmof water
(P) duringa 100-minperiod in the drainageexperiment.
t WS~" P WS,t D~ AWD~
h cm %
0.07 63.01(0.28)§ 7.25 65.33(0.75) 4.93 68
6 63.01(0.28) 7.25 63.45(0.29) 6.81 94
24 63.01(0.28) 7.25 62.87(0.16) 7.39 102
Initial waterstorage(WSi)is total waterpresentin profile prior
irrigation.Waterstorageat timet (WS,)is thepredictedtotal water
contenttakenfromregressionequationssuchas shownin Fig. 1.
Drainage(D) is calculatedas D= WSI+ P - WS,andappliedwater
drainedbelow112.5cm(AWD)is calculatedas D/P.
Valuesin parenthesesare standarddeviations.
DIEROLF ET AL.: WATERANDCATION MOVEMENTIN AN INDONESIANULTISOL 575
~._.0.70 L
’o E ~ ~ o.o y =-0.0357Ln(x)+ 0.6397
~o.5o’- ~
~ y = -O.0392Ln(x)* 0.4534
~
R2 = 0.9861
lO lOO lOOO
Matricpotential(-kPa)
Fig. 2. ttydradic conductivity at the 22.5- andll2.5-cm depths as a
function of the averagevolumetricwatercontent for the respective
15-cm depth increment above each depth. The 22.5-cm depth was
unreplicated due to tensiometer failure. Symbolsrepresent calcu-
lated values for each replication at the 22.5-cm(solid circles) and
the 52.5-cm (open, solid squares) depths.
irrigation period ceased (Fig. 1). However,the change
in soil watershownin Fig. 1 represents drainageequal
to only 32%of the applied water, because 68%of the
applied water had drained (AWD)past the 112.5-cm
depthwithin 4.2 minafter irrigation hadceased(Table
3). Six hoursafter irrigation ceased, about94%of the
applied water had drained below 112.5 cm.
Hydraulic conductivities at various depths initially
ranged from 2 to 8 cmh-1, but decreased abruptly with
a slight dropin the watercontent(Fig. 2). For example,
after 24 h of drainage, the volumetric water content at
the 112.5-cm depth decreased from an initial value of
0.622 cm3 cm-3 to 0.606 cm3 cm-3, while the hydraulic
conductivity decreased from 8.03 cmh-] to about 0.06
cm
Water Content and Retention
Watercontent at field capacity (at 24 h after irrigation
ceased) increased with depth (Table 4). Morewater
retained at a given matric potential in the 55- to 65-
cmdepth than in the 0- to 4-cm depth (Fig. 3). The
macroporosityrangedfrom26 to 40%of the total poros-
ity in the surface 22.5 cmand 5 to 7%in the subsoil.
Macroporosities determined from the water retention
data (0 to 4 cm = 40%, 5 to 15 cm = 22%, 20 to 30
10
8 o.ol
0.001
0.0001
log Y=~24~6C3mx-76.79 = /.
! 112.5 cm "~
t~ log Y =~- 82.12 E
~ R= = 0.795
0.650.45 0.50 0.55 0.60
Volumetricwatercontent(cm3 cm"3)
Fig. 3. Soil moisture release curves determined on field (open
squares) and core (solid squares) samples at the 55 to 65-cmdepth
andfor core (solid circles) samplesat the 0 to 4-cmdepth. Regres-
sion statistics for the twodepths not shownin the figure are: 5 to
15 cm, Y = -0.06 iogX + 0.55, Rz = 0.685, n = 41; 20 to 30 cm,
Y = -0.02 IogX + 0.55, Rz = 0.303, n = 41. Except for the 0- to
4-cm depth, the data points at -400 kPa werenot included in the
regression analyses.
cm = 10%,and 55 to 65 cm = 4%), were similar to those
determined at field capacity in the drainage experiment
(Table 4).
Thesoil matric potential at field capacity generally
decreased with depth and ranged from -4.6 kPa at 7.5
cm to -1.8 kPa at 105 cm(Table 4). Evenafter 963
of drainage, the soil matric potential did not exceed
-10.0 kPa (data not shown). Irrigation did not signifi-
cantly increase subsoil pore saturation, becausethe ini-
tial pore saturation was already high and remained so
even after 963 h of drainage (Table 5).
Hydraulic Conductivity
Conductivities determined from the drainage experi-
ment confirm that a large volume of water can move
rapidly throughthis soil (Fig. 2). Aryaet al. (1993)
reported high field-saturated hydraulic conductivities,
ranging from 2 to morethan 9 cmh-1, in an experiment
conducted near the present experiment. The ability of
this clay-textured soil to rapidly transmit water, as im-
plied by saturated conductivityanddrainagerates (Ta-
ble 3) and by the sharp drop in the total water content
curves over time (Fig. 1), suggests the presence of mac-
ropore flow.
Table 4. Bulk density (BD), particle density (PD), porosity (P), and soil matric potential (~), volumetric water content (0), and
macroporosity (MP) at field capacity for several depths.
Mean
Atfield capacity§
depth BD PD? P~ 0 0¶ MP#
cm gem-3 cmJ cm-3 kPa em3 cm-~ %
3.75?? 0.91 (0.03)$$ 2.61 (0.01) 0.651 -4.6 (0.8)$$ 0.389(0.005) 40
15 0.9310.06) 2.70 (0.08) 0.656 -4.4 (0.9) 0.486 (0.020) 26
30 1.09(0.03) 2.72(0.02) 0.599 -3.5 (0.9) 0.569(0.013) 5
45 1.05(0.05) 2.75 (0.01) 0.618 -3.4 (0.7) 0.578(0.009) 7
60 1.03(0.03) 2.72(0.06) 0.621 -2.6 (0.6) 0.579(0.008) 7
75 1.00(0.04) 2.72 (0.04) 0.632 -2.9 (0.7) 0.587(0.008) 7
90 1.01(0.02) 2.80(0.03) 0.639 -2.3 (0.7) 0.596(0.007) 7
105 0.97(0.02) 2.75 (0.05) 0.647 -1.8 (0.9) 0.602(0.007) 7
Meanof three samples using pycnometer method.
P = 1 - (BD/PD).
Values at field opacity weredeterminedfromthe internal drainageexperiment.
Meanvolumetricwatercontent(24 h after irrigation ceased)predictedfromregression equations that werefit to drainagecurvesfor eachdepthincrement.
[1 - (volumetric water content/P)] x 100.
?? Tensiometermidpointlocated at 7.5 cmfor this depth.
:~:~ Valuesin parenthesesare standarddeviations (for BDand PD)or standarderrors (for 0 and 0).
576 AGRONOMYJOURNAL,VOL. 89, JULY-AUGUST1997
Table 5. Pore saturation (volumetric water content/porosity) pro-
files at several times during drainage after a 100-min irrigation
period with 72.5 mmof water.
Soil depth Pre-irrigafion 0.6 22.7 963 LSD(0.05)’~
cm cm3 cm-3
0- 7.5 0.575 0.648 0.599 0.548 0.022
%5- 22.5 0.739 0.782 0.733 0.718 NS
22.5- 37.5 0.952 0.978 0.945 0.930 NS
37.5- 52.5 0.945 0.945 0.928 0.915 NS
52.5- 67.5 0.944 0.947 0.924 0.919 NS
67.5- 82.5 0.934 0.96I 0.918 0.914 0.002
82.5- 97.5 0.929 0.951 0.933 0.921 NS
97.5-112.5 0.935 0.941 0.932 0.911 NS
~ LSDsfor time effects at each depth.
Macropore Flow
Results of the internal drainage (Table 4) and water
retention experiments (Fig. 3) showthat this soil con-
tains both pores that drain water rapidly under high soil
matric potential and pores that retain a large amount
of water under low soil matric potential. Soils that ex-
hibit this type of behavior are considered to have two
domains (Brusseau and Rao, 1990), mobile and immo-
bile. Themobile domainhas a higher conductivity than
the immobile domain. The macroporosity (representing
the mobile domain) does not have to comprise a large
fraction of the total pore volumeto greatly affect water
infiltration and redistribution (White, 1985). Radulov-
ich et al. (1989) reported that macropores comprised
only 0.075 to 0.091 m3 m-3 of the total volume of a
soil with an average infiltration rate of 39 cmh-~. The
macroporosity shownin Table 4 is based on pore size,
and is not evidencethat all of this pore space contributes
to macroporeflow (Skopp, 1981). Additionally, because
field soils do not usually saturate completely, the pore
volume contributing to macropore flow is probably
lower than the macroporosity shown in Table 4 (Arya
et al., 1993).
Wespeculate that the most likely route for the rapid
downwarddrainage in this soil is flow along the ped
faces (Boumaet al., 1977) that are a feature of the
subangular blocky structure in the subsoil (Table 1).
Field observations madeat our experimental site sug-
gest that a small change in subsoil volumetric water
content of about 0.05 cm3 cm-3 resulted in the appear-
ance of fracture planes amongpeds.
The change in the macroporosity and pore saturation
that occurs between the 15- and 30-cmdepths (Tables
4 and 5) corresponds to the A-Bhorizon transition zone
Table 6. Calculation of K, Ca, and Mgrecovery at 24 mo after initiation of the K management experiment.
Changein soli’~
Stover a, applied b, removed
Treatment no. management as fertilizer in 6 crops (0-30 cm) (30-90 cm)
D, cation not
recovered~
1 returned 70 101 - 53
3 returned 250 107 32
6 returned 250§ 99 56
8 returned 600 112 224
2 removed 70 161 -29
5 removed 215 232 -62
4 removed 250 246 -56
7 removed 250§ 240 -40
9 removed 600 323 81
K, kg ha-1
-14
6
2
5
-1
-14
0
5
-4
36
105
93
259
-61
59
46
45
200
LSD(0.05)¶ 15.9 54.0 NS 68.5
CV, % 6.1 231.3 10.0 50.7
Ca, kg ha-1
Mg, kg ha-t
1 returned 1454 33 962
3 returned 1508 34 955
6 returned 1593 34 1159
8 returned 1576 34 1168
2 removed 1539 91 972
5 removed 1544 120 991
4 removed 1548 112 888
7 removed 1533 124 939
9 removed 1519 121 816
LSD(0.05) 7.6 NS
CV, % 6.8 21.7
17
55
73
130
113
30
65
91
48
NS
104.8
10
2O
24
12
4
12
11
-4
NS
126~,
1 returned 46 22 14
3 returned 46 20 3
6 returned 46 21 20
8 returned 46 20 9
2 removed 46 29 0
5 removed 46 39 8
4 removed 46 34 - 10
7 removed 46 37 -1
9 removed 46 35 5
LSD(0.05) 3.1 NS
CV, % 7.5 224.9
442
464
327
244
363
4O3
483
379
534
NS
61.5
0
3
-24
5
4
-5
13
-3
10
NS
2525.2
Increase or decrease (negative values) in soil cation between0 and 24 too.
D = a - b - c~e - c90. Cation not recovered is assumedlost to leaching; negative values indicate a net increase.
Split application.
LSDfor treatment differences.
DIEROLF ET AL.: WATER AND CATION MOVEMENTIN AN INDONESIAN ULTISOL 577
(Table 1). Quisenberry and Phillips (1976) found
water percolated as a front through topsoil until it
reached untilled subsoil where water then moved
through macropore channels. In another soil, they
showedevidence of water building up at the tilled-
untilled soil interface until enoughpositive head devel-
oped to allow water to enter larger subsoil macropores.
This clayey soil retained large amountsof water, espe-
cially in the subsoil, evenafter several weeksof drainage
(Table 5). Evenwhenthe subsoil soil matric potential
reached -100 kPa, the water retention curves for the
subsoil depths showedthat very little water wasreleased
between field capacity (-1.3 to -3.8 kPa) and -100
kPa (Fig. 3). Subsoil water contents of soils in Sitiung
can remain high even under typical field conditions. For
example, during a 36-d drought for a cowpeacrop, pore
saturation at the 60-cm depth ranged from 70 to 80%
(Arya et al., 1992). In another experiment, the soil ma-
tric potential reached only -55 kPa at the 52.5-cmdepth
for a maize(Zea maysL.) crop planted on soils limed to
the 50-cmdepth during a dry period (Arya et al., 1992).
In summary, micropores predominate the subsoil
pore space in Sitiung soils, and these micropores are
usually water-filled. The subsoil water contained in
these micropores is not easily removed, even under nor-
malfield conditions, resulting in a subsoil that is usually
wet. Moist or wet soil is associated with high bypass
flowdue to relatively lowinfiltration rates of percolating
water into the water-filled soil matrix (Bouma,1991).
Wespeculate that most of nutrient-carrying water that
drains throughthe soil profile will not displace signifi-
cant amountsof subsoil water held in the soil matrix.
Thus, most of the percolating water, and the solutes
movingwith it, will bypassthe subsoil pores in this soil.
It follows, then, that subsoil cation accumulation will
have to rely on the muchslower process of diffusion.
Measurement of Cation Leaching
and Accumulation
Surface Soil Cation Losses
A total of 6880 mmof rain was recorded during the
24-mo period of the field experiment. The amount of
K not recovered was assumed to have leached. The
amount of K not recovered depended on the treatment
and ranged from a loss of 259kg Kha-1 to a net increase
of 61 kg K ha-1 (Table 6). Theamount of K not recov-
ered or leached K ranged from 0 (Treatment 2) to 51%
(Treatment 1), and averaged 33%for all treatments.
Leaching losses were generally greater at the highest
total K fertilization rate (600 kg K ha-1 or 120 kg K
ha-1 crop-1) than where less K was applied. This con-
trasts with results from an Oxisol in the Sitiung area,
where large K leaching losses did not occur at rates of
120 kg K ha-l; there, losses were reported only when
240 kg K ha-1 was applied per crop (Gill and Kam-
prath, 1990).
Calcium leaching losses were not affected by treat-
ments. Anaverage of 404 kg Ca ha-1 leached below the
90-cm depth and losses averaged 26%of the applied
Ca considering all treatments. Magnesiumleaching
losses did not significantly differ amongtreatments and
losses averaged about 8%of the applied Mg. The rela-
tive mobility of the cations (Ca >> K > Mg) in this
field experimentis similar to the relative cation concen-
trations determined in leachates from zero-tension ly-
simeters used in another experiment at the study site
(Dierolf, 1992).
Subsoil Cation Accumulation
Both Ca, applied in larger doses than K, and Mg,
applied in smaller doses than K, resulted in greater
accumulation of cations in the 30- to 90-cmdepth than
did K (Table 6). Although Ca ions accumulated in the
greatest absolute amountin the 30- to 90-cmdepth, the
accumulated Ca was equal to only 5%of that applied.
Comparing treatments of 0.375 Mgand 5.0 Mglime
ha-1 in two Oxisols in the Sitiung area, Gill (1988) re-
ported an increase of 0.2 to 0.3 cmolcCakg-1 in the 30-
to 50-cmdepth. This increase is equivalent to about 80
to 120 kg Ca ha-1 or 6 to 9%of the Ca applied in the
treatment with 5 Mglime ha-L
Amounts of Mgand K that accumulated in the 30-
to 90-cmdepth were lower than for Ca (Table 6). How-
ever, the percent of Mgaccumulating in the subsoil was
0.00
0
15
-~30 °
£ .
.~ 45
75
90
0.10
ExchangeableCation (cmole kg"~)
0.20 0.30 0,0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0
30
45
60
75
90
Initial ¯
Final °
OmO0
0 I
15
30
45
60
75
90
0.10 0.20 0.30
I ~ I ~
Fig. 4. Exchangeable K, Ca, and Mgin the soil profile before and after the application of (in kg ha -I) 600 K (as KCI), 1519 Ca (as CaCO3),
and 46 Mg (as MgSO4) to six crops grown during a 24-mo period (Treatment 9). Horizontal bars show the standard errors of the mean
four treatments.
578 AGRONOMY JOURNAL, VOL. 89, JULY-AUGUST 1997
the highest for the three cations, averaging 24% of the
applied Mg considering all treatments. An average of
less than 1% of the K applied as fertilizer accumulated
in the 30- to 90-cm depth (Table 6). This result is similar
to that reported by Gill and Kamprath (1990) on an
Oxisol in the Sitiung area. In their study, K did not
accumulate below the 30-cm depth even after a total of
240 kg K ha"1
was applied.
Figure 4 shows the distribution of cations in the soil
profile before and after the 24-mo experiment for the
highest K treatment with stover removal (Treatment 9).
There was only a significant increase of cations at the
0- to 15-cm and 15- to 30-cm depths. However, the
amount of cations assumed leached beyond the 90-cm
depth for Treatment 9 were (in kg ha"1
) 200 K, 534 Ca,
and 10 Mg (Table 6).
Although a low effective cation exchange capacity
reduces the capacity of a soil to retain cations, studies
indicate that cation accumulation can occur in a low
ECEC subsoil (Souza et al., 1979; Ritchey et al., 1980;
Friesen et al., 1982; Fageria et al., 1990). The subsoil
cation accumulation reported in these soils may be be-
cause subsoil drying occurred as suggested by either the
ustic moisture regime or coarse-texture of these soils.
A dry subsoil is more conducive to the movement of
water and cations into unsaturated micropores (Beven
and Germann, 1982). Subsoil dryingwould also increase
the possibility that the cations may be retained against
subsequent leaching loss via macropore flow (Shipitalo
et al., 1990).
The soil studied in our experiments also has a low
ECEC, but the subsoil is almost always water-filled.
Thus, we propose that the major mechanism controlling
the lack of subsoil accumulation of cations in our soil
is macropore flow, which causes both water and nutri-
ents to bypass the subsoil matrix. The likelihood of
percolating water and nutrients movement into the mi-
cropores that comprise the subsoil matrix is further re-
duced because the micropores are usually water-filled.
CONCLUSION
We conclude that it is difficult, using commonly avail-
able lime and fertilizers, to chemically improve the sub-
soil below the 30-cm depth. We hypothesize that mac-
ropore flow through the soil and a continually wet
subsoil are the major factors limiting subsoil cation accu-
mulation.
Pushing nutrients into the subsoil below the 30-cm
depth by increasing fertilizer rates or by applying more
soluble forms may result in most of the nutrients by-
passing the saturated subsoil micropores. Calcium and
K were quite mobile in the soil we studied, because large
quantitieswere not recovered by either soil extraction or
in plant uptake and were assumed to have leached below
90cm.
An alternative strategy for soil cation management
in this acid Typic Kanhapludult might be to limit the
target for chemical amelioration to the surface 30 cm.
Roots of Al-tolerant crops such as rice and cowpea
can tap the subsoil water without subsoil amendments.
Growth of crops more sensitive to Al, such as maize,
may already benefit from liming to the 30-cm depth.
For example, Arya et al. (1992) showed that maize grain
yield in Sitiung was already greatly improved when lime
was distributed down to 30 cm, rather than to 10 cm.
Our study showed that Ca from surface-applied lime
will accumulate in the 15- to 30-cm depth and this may
be sufficient to improve maize production.
HOOKER ET AL.: ALTERNATIVE WEED CONTROL WITH CONSERVATION TILLAGE FOR SOYBEAN 579

More Related Content

What's hot

Pdf 55555555
Pdf 55555555Pdf 55555555
Pdf 55555555
Zeratul Aldaris
 
Soil and soil diversity
Soil and soil diversitySoil and soil diversity
Soil and soil diversity
Makati Science High School
 
Erodibility of slash and-burn soils along a toposequence in relation to four ...
Erodibility of slash and-burn soils along a toposequence in relation to four ...Erodibility of slash and-burn soils along a toposequence in relation to four ...
Erodibility of slash and-burn soils along a toposequence in relation to four ...
Alexander Decker
 
Engineering methods to control soil erosion
Engineering methods to control soil erosionEngineering methods to control soil erosion
Engineering methods to control soil erosion
Santosh pathak
 
Soil quality - does it matter?
Soil quality - does it matter?Soil quality - does it matter?
Soil quality - does it matter?
jbgruver
 
Soil Orders in Pakistan
Soil Orders in PakistanSoil Orders in Pakistan
Soil Orders in Pakistan
Ghulam Asghar
 
Pakistan’s soil resources
Pakistan’s soil resourcesPakistan’s soil resources
Pakistan’s soil resources
Sajid Sarwar
 
LAND CAPABILITY CLASSIFICATION
LAND CAPABILITY CLASSIFICATIONLAND CAPABILITY CLASSIFICATION
LAND CAPABILITY CLASSIFICATION
debaaaaaaaa
 
Takawira, Gwenzi & Nyamugafata 2014 geoderma hydrocarbons (1)
Takawira, Gwenzi & Nyamugafata 2014 geoderma hydrocarbons (1)Takawira, Gwenzi & Nyamugafata 2014 geoderma hydrocarbons (1)
Takawira, Gwenzi & Nyamugafata 2014 geoderma hydrocarbons (1)
ammishaddai takawira
 
Effectiveness and sustainability of remedial actions for land restoration in ...
Effectiveness and sustainabilityof remedial actions for land restorationin ...Effectiveness and sustainabilityof remedial actions for land restorationin ...
Effectiveness and sustainability of remedial actions for land restoration in ...
Zainab Arshad
 
Webb et al 1978
Webb et al 1978Webb et al 1978
Webb et al 1978
William Godwin
 
Universal soil loss equation ; soil loss measurement
Universal soil loss equation ; soil loss measurementUniversal soil loss equation ; soil loss measurement
Universal soil loss equation ; soil loss measurement
Dr. Sanjay Singh Chouhan
 
Presentation 1
Presentation 1Presentation 1
Presentation 1
Ihtisham Ali
 
Biodrainage
BiodrainageBiodrainage
IOSR Journal of Pharmacy (IOSRPHR), www.iosrphr.org, call for paper, research...
IOSR Journal of Pharmacy (IOSRPHR), www.iosrphr.org, call for paper, research...IOSR Journal of Pharmacy (IOSRPHR), www.iosrphr.org, call for paper, research...
IOSR Journal of Pharmacy (IOSRPHR), www.iosrphr.org, call for paper, research...
iosrphr_editor
 
Soil health for sustainable production intensification some perspectives
Soil health for sustainable production intensification some perspectivesSoil health for sustainable production intensification some perspectives
Soil health for sustainable production intensification some perspectives
Sri Lmb
 
Item 3: ST and WRB, an introduction
Item 3: ST and WRB, an introductionItem 3: ST and WRB, an introduction
Item 3: ST and WRB, an introduction
ExternalEvents
 
FELIX PROJECT
FELIX PROJECTFELIX PROJECT
FELIX PROJECT
felix aladetan
 
Bio engineering methods and their control for soil erosion
Bio engineering methods and their control for soil erosionBio engineering methods and their control for soil erosion
Bio engineering methods and their control for soil erosion
Santosh pathak
 
Fpt 2093 soil_science_week_10_soil_taxonomy
Fpt 2093 soil_science_week_10_soil_taxonomyFpt 2093 soil_science_week_10_soil_taxonomy
Fpt 2093 soil_science_week_10_soil_taxonomy
Rione Drevale
 

What's hot (20)

Pdf 55555555
Pdf 55555555Pdf 55555555
Pdf 55555555
 
Soil and soil diversity
Soil and soil diversitySoil and soil diversity
Soil and soil diversity
 
Erodibility of slash and-burn soils along a toposequence in relation to four ...
Erodibility of slash and-burn soils along a toposequence in relation to four ...Erodibility of slash and-burn soils along a toposequence in relation to four ...
Erodibility of slash and-burn soils along a toposequence in relation to four ...
 
Engineering methods to control soil erosion
Engineering methods to control soil erosionEngineering methods to control soil erosion
Engineering methods to control soil erosion
 
Soil quality - does it matter?
Soil quality - does it matter?Soil quality - does it matter?
Soil quality - does it matter?
 
Soil Orders in Pakistan
Soil Orders in PakistanSoil Orders in Pakistan
Soil Orders in Pakistan
 
Pakistan’s soil resources
Pakistan’s soil resourcesPakistan’s soil resources
Pakistan’s soil resources
 
LAND CAPABILITY CLASSIFICATION
LAND CAPABILITY CLASSIFICATIONLAND CAPABILITY CLASSIFICATION
LAND CAPABILITY CLASSIFICATION
 
Takawira, Gwenzi & Nyamugafata 2014 geoderma hydrocarbons (1)
Takawira, Gwenzi & Nyamugafata 2014 geoderma hydrocarbons (1)Takawira, Gwenzi & Nyamugafata 2014 geoderma hydrocarbons (1)
Takawira, Gwenzi & Nyamugafata 2014 geoderma hydrocarbons (1)
 
Effectiveness and sustainability of remedial actions for land restoration in ...
Effectiveness and sustainabilityof remedial actions for land restorationin ...Effectiveness and sustainabilityof remedial actions for land restorationin ...
Effectiveness and sustainability of remedial actions for land restoration in ...
 
Webb et al 1978
Webb et al 1978Webb et al 1978
Webb et al 1978
 
Universal soil loss equation ; soil loss measurement
Universal soil loss equation ; soil loss measurementUniversal soil loss equation ; soil loss measurement
Universal soil loss equation ; soil loss measurement
 
Presentation 1
Presentation 1Presentation 1
Presentation 1
 
Biodrainage
BiodrainageBiodrainage
Biodrainage
 
IOSR Journal of Pharmacy (IOSRPHR), www.iosrphr.org, call for paper, research...
IOSR Journal of Pharmacy (IOSRPHR), www.iosrphr.org, call for paper, research...IOSR Journal of Pharmacy (IOSRPHR), www.iosrphr.org, call for paper, research...
IOSR Journal of Pharmacy (IOSRPHR), www.iosrphr.org, call for paper, research...
 
Soil health for sustainable production intensification some perspectives
Soil health for sustainable production intensification some perspectivesSoil health for sustainable production intensification some perspectives
Soil health for sustainable production intensification some perspectives
 
Item 3: ST and WRB, an introduction
Item 3: ST and WRB, an introductionItem 3: ST and WRB, an introduction
Item 3: ST and WRB, an introduction
 
FELIX PROJECT
FELIX PROJECTFELIX PROJECT
FELIX PROJECT
 
Bio engineering methods and their control for soil erosion
Bio engineering methods and their control for soil erosionBio engineering methods and their control for soil erosion
Bio engineering methods and their control for soil erosion
 
Fpt 2093 soil_science_week_10_soil_taxonomy
Fpt 2093 soil_science_week_10_soil_taxonomyFpt 2093 soil_science_week_10_soil_taxonomy
Fpt 2093 soil_science_week_10_soil_taxonomy
 

Viewers also liked

Comelit 31613A Data Sheet
Comelit 31613A Data SheetComelit 31613A Data Sheet
Comelit 31613A Data Sheet
JMAC Supply
 
Comelit 31611 Data Sheet
Comelit 31611 Data SheetComelit 31611 Data Sheet
Comelit 31611 Data Sheet
JMAC Supply
 
Orientaciones EBR para la planificación
Orientaciones EBR para la planificaciónOrientaciones EBR para la planificación
Orientaciones EBR para la planificación
Angel Bernabé Palli Salas
 
Evaluation - Question 3
Evaluation - Question 3Evaluation - Question 3
Evaluation - Question 3
NatalieW6763
 
Newsletter mailchimp
Newsletter   mailchimpNewsletter   mailchimp
Newsletter mailchimp
Laura Dereze
 
Motivação e aprendizagem
Motivação e aprendizagemMotivação e aprendizagem
Motivação e aprendizagem
Aline Cavalcante
 
Os seres vivos são diferentes
Os seres vivos são diferentesOs seres vivos são diferentes
Os seres vivos são diferentes
fabvieira
 
IP storage
IP storageIP storage
IP storage
Priyanka Patil
 
Estrategias Metodológicas para estimular la lectura de imágenes en el nivel i...
Estrategias Metodológicas para estimular la lectura de imágenes en el nivel i...Estrategias Metodológicas para estimular la lectura de imágenes en el nivel i...
Estrategias Metodológicas para estimular la lectura de imágenes en el nivel i...
Universidad Católica Santo Toribio de Mogrovejo
 

Viewers also liked (9)

Comelit 31613A Data Sheet
Comelit 31613A Data SheetComelit 31613A Data Sheet
Comelit 31613A Data Sheet
 
Comelit 31611 Data Sheet
Comelit 31611 Data SheetComelit 31611 Data Sheet
Comelit 31611 Data Sheet
 
Orientaciones EBR para la planificación
Orientaciones EBR para la planificaciónOrientaciones EBR para la planificación
Orientaciones EBR para la planificación
 
Evaluation - Question 3
Evaluation - Question 3Evaluation - Question 3
Evaluation - Question 3
 
Newsletter mailchimp
Newsletter   mailchimpNewsletter   mailchimp
Newsletter mailchimp
 
Motivação e aprendizagem
Motivação e aprendizagemMotivação e aprendizagem
Motivação e aprendizagem
 
Os seres vivos são diferentes
Os seres vivos são diferentesOs seres vivos são diferentes
Os seres vivos são diferentes
 
IP storage
IP storageIP storage
IP storage
 
Estrategias Metodológicas para estimular la lectura de imágenes en el nivel i...
Estrategias Metodológicas para estimular la lectura de imágenes en el nivel i...Estrategias Metodológicas para estimular la lectura de imágenes en el nivel i...
Estrategias Metodológicas para estimular la lectura de imágenes en el nivel i...
 

Similar to DierolfAryaYostWater1997

Puddling
PuddlingPuddling
Puddling
ravi kiran
 
A12v20n1
A12v20n1A12v20n1
A12v20n1
ssusereb85c4
 
Carbon sequestration through the use of biosolids in soils of the Pampas reg...
 Carbon sequestration through the use of biosolids in soils of the Pampas reg... Carbon sequestration through the use of biosolids in soils of the Pampas reg...
Carbon sequestration through the use of biosolids in soils of the Pampas reg...
Silvana Torri
 
Effect of Soil Salinity on Growth of Millet in Lysimeter Experiment
Effect of Soil Salinity on Growth of Millet in Lysimeter ExperimentEffect of Soil Salinity on Growth of Millet in Lysimeter Experiment
Effect of Soil Salinity on Growth of Millet in Lysimeter Experiment
iosrjce
 
Buried straw layer plus plastic mulching reduces soil salinity.pdf
Buried straw layer plus plastic mulching reduces soil salinity.pdfBuried straw layer plus plastic mulching reduces soil salinity.pdf
Buried straw layer plus plastic mulching reduces soil salinity.pdf
Siamak Alizade
 
UNUIGBE BENJAMIN INFILTRATION POTENTIAL (FINAL DRAFT)
UNUIGBE BENJAMIN INFILTRATION POTENTIAL (FINAL DRAFT)UNUIGBE BENJAMIN INFILTRATION POTENTIAL (FINAL DRAFT)
UNUIGBE BENJAMIN INFILTRATION POTENTIAL (FINAL DRAFT)
Kokei Ofem
 
CARBON STOCK AND CARBON SEQUESTRATION POTENTIAL UNDER DIFFERENT LAND USE OF I...
CARBON STOCK AND CARBON SEQUESTRATION POTENTIAL UNDER DIFFERENT LAND USE OF I...CARBON STOCK AND CARBON SEQUESTRATION POTENTIAL UNDER DIFFERENT LAND USE OF I...
CARBON STOCK AND CARBON SEQUESTRATION POTENTIAL UNDER DIFFERENT LAND USE OF I...
RJSREBCRAN
 
Pipe report
Pipe reportPipe report
Pipe report
tp jayamohan
 
46062-188828-1-PB(1)
46062-188828-1-PB(1)46062-188828-1-PB(1)
46062-188828-1-PB(1)
Kaveh Ostad-Ali-Askari
 
IRJET- Geotechnical Evaluation of Soils Found in Konso Town
IRJET- Geotechnical Evaluation of Soils Found in Konso TownIRJET- Geotechnical Evaluation of Soils Found in Konso Town
IRJET- Geotechnical Evaluation of Soils Found in Konso Town
IRJET Journal
 
Impacts of Changing land cover and Climate on Hokersar wetland in Kashmir
Impacts of Changing land cover and Climate on Hokersar wetland in KashmirImpacts of Changing land cover and Climate on Hokersar wetland in Kashmir
Impacts of Changing land cover and Climate on Hokersar wetland in Kashmir
Shakil Romshoo
 
Research Work on Hokersar
Research Work on HokersarResearch Work on Hokersar
Research Work on Hokersar
Shakil Romshoo
 
Soil Carbon Sequestration Potentials of Semi-arid soils at the CCAFS Site in ...
Soil Carbon Sequestration Potentials of Semi-arid soils at the CCAFS Site in ...Soil Carbon Sequestration Potentials of Semi-arid soils at the CCAFS Site in ...
Soil Carbon Sequestration Potentials of Semi-arid soils at the CCAFS Site in ...
CCAFS | CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security
 
Fredrick Wandera CLIFF Workshop
Fredrick Wandera CLIFF WorkshopFredrick Wandera CLIFF Workshop
Fredrick Wandera CLIFF Workshop
MerylRichards
 
Visualizing clogging up of soil pores in the tropical degraded soils and thei...
Visualizing clogging up of soil pores in the tropical degraded soils and thei...Visualizing clogging up of soil pores in the tropical degraded soils and thei...
Visualizing clogging up of soil pores in the tropical degraded soils and thei...
International Water Management Institute (IWMI)
 
Salinity+environment+plants+molecules
Salinity+environment+plants+moleculesSalinity+environment+plants+molecules
Salinity+environment+plants+molecules
Sandro Bomfim
 
1.ce206 lecture 1-2
1.ce206 lecture 1-21.ce206 lecture 1-2
1.ce206 lecture 1-2
IMALONE1
 
Nwaishi e al. 2015
Nwaishi e al. 2015Nwaishi e al. 2015
Soil Case Study
Soil Case StudySoil Case Study
Soil Case Study
Kimberly Thomas
 
MATHEMATICAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SOIL MOISTURE AND GROUNDWATER LEVEL IN A LO...
MATHEMATICAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SOIL MOISTURE AND GROUNDWATER LEVEL IN A LO...MATHEMATICAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SOIL MOISTURE AND GROUNDWATER LEVEL IN A LO...
MATHEMATICAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SOIL MOISTURE AND GROUNDWATER LEVEL IN A LO...
IAEME Publication
 

Similar to DierolfAryaYostWater1997 (20)

Puddling
PuddlingPuddling
Puddling
 
A12v20n1
A12v20n1A12v20n1
A12v20n1
 
Carbon sequestration through the use of biosolids in soils of the Pampas reg...
 Carbon sequestration through the use of biosolids in soils of the Pampas reg... Carbon sequestration through the use of biosolids in soils of the Pampas reg...
Carbon sequestration through the use of biosolids in soils of the Pampas reg...
 
Effect of Soil Salinity on Growth of Millet in Lysimeter Experiment
Effect of Soil Salinity on Growth of Millet in Lysimeter ExperimentEffect of Soil Salinity on Growth of Millet in Lysimeter Experiment
Effect of Soil Salinity on Growth of Millet in Lysimeter Experiment
 
Buried straw layer plus plastic mulching reduces soil salinity.pdf
Buried straw layer plus plastic mulching reduces soil salinity.pdfBuried straw layer plus plastic mulching reduces soil salinity.pdf
Buried straw layer plus plastic mulching reduces soil salinity.pdf
 
UNUIGBE BENJAMIN INFILTRATION POTENTIAL (FINAL DRAFT)
UNUIGBE BENJAMIN INFILTRATION POTENTIAL (FINAL DRAFT)UNUIGBE BENJAMIN INFILTRATION POTENTIAL (FINAL DRAFT)
UNUIGBE BENJAMIN INFILTRATION POTENTIAL (FINAL DRAFT)
 
CARBON STOCK AND CARBON SEQUESTRATION POTENTIAL UNDER DIFFERENT LAND USE OF I...
CARBON STOCK AND CARBON SEQUESTRATION POTENTIAL UNDER DIFFERENT LAND USE OF I...CARBON STOCK AND CARBON SEQUESTRATION POTENTIAL UNDER DIFFERENT LAND USE OF I...
CARBON STOCK AND CARBON SEQUESTRATION POTENTIAL UNDER DIFFERENT LAND USE OF I...
 
Pipe report
Pipe reportPipe report
Pipe report
 
46062-188828-1-PB(1)
46062-188828-1-PB(1)46062-188828-1-PB(1)
46062-188828-1-PB(1)
 
IRJET- Geotechnical Evaluation of Soils Found in Konso Town
IRJET- Geotechnical Evaluation of Soils Found in Konso TownIRJET- Geotechnical Evaluation of Soils Found in Konso Town
IRJET- Geotechnical Evaluation of Soils Found in Konso Town
 
Impacts of Changing land cover and Climate on Hokersar wetland in Kashmir
Impacts of Changing land cover and Climate on Hokersar wetland in KashmirImpacts of Changing land cover and Climate on Hokersar wetland in Kashmir
Impacts of Changing land cover and Climate on Hokersar wetland in Kashmir
 
Research Work on Hokersar
Research Work on HokersarResearch Work on Hokersar
Research Work on Hokersar
 
Soil Carbon Sequestration Potentials of Semi-arid soils at the CCAFS Site in ...
Soil Carbon Sequestration Potentials of Semi-arid soils at the CCAFS Site in ...Soil Carbon Sequestration Potentials of Semi-arid soils at the CCAFS Site in ...
Soil Carbon Sequestration Potentials of Semi-arid soils at the CCAFS Site in ...
 
Fredrick Wandera CLIFF Workshop
Fredrick Wandera CLIFF WorkshopFredrick Wandera CLIFF Workshop
Fredrick Wandera CLIFF Workshop
 
Visualizing clogging up of soil pores in the tropical degraded soils and thei...
Visualizing clogging up of soil pores in the tropical degraded soils and thei...Visualizing clogging up of soil pores in the tropical degraded soils and thei...
Visualizing clogging up of soil pores in the tropical degraded soils and thei...
 
Salinity+environment+plants+molecules
Salinity+environment+plants+moleculesSalinity+environment+plants+molecules
Salinity+environment+plants+molecules
 
1.ce206 lecture 1-2
1.ce206 lecture 1-21.ce206 lecture 1-2
1.ce206 lecture 1-2
 
Nwaishi e al. 2015
Nwaishi e al. 2015Nwaishi e al. 2015
Nwaishi e al. 2015
 
Soil Case Study
Soil Case StudySoil Case Study
Soil Case Study
 
MATHEMATICAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SOIL MOISTURE AND GROUNDWATER LEVEL IN A LO...
MATHEMATICAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SOIL MOISTURE AND GROUNDWATER LEVEL IN A LO...MATHEMATICAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SOIL MOISTURE AND GROUNDWATER LEVEL IN A LO...
MATHEMATICAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SOIL MOISTURE AND GROUNDWATER LEVEL IN A LO...
 

DierolfAryaYostWater1997

  • 2. Water and Cation Movementin an Indonesian Ultisol ThomasS Dierolf, Lalit M. Arya, and Russell S. Yost* ABSTRACT Limeandfertilizer are requiredto overcomeacidity andsoil fertility constraints to cropproductionin the highly weatheredsoils of Sitiung, Indonesia. The potential leaching of soil amendmentsis enhancedby the high annual rainfall of 2750 mmand the low effective cation exchange capacity (ECEC)of these soils. Thepurpose of this study wasto understand the relationship of soil water hydrology to the fate of applied soil amendments.Internal soil waterdrainage (field- measured) andsoil moisture release curves (field- andlaboratory- measured)weredeterminedto characterize the soil hydraulic proper- ties of a clayey, kaolinitic, isohyperthermicTypic Kanhapludult.The results indicated that 6 h after the application of 72.5 mmof water during a ]00-min period, water equivalent to nearly 94%of the applied water drained to depths below 112.5 cm. Macroporevolumeaccounted for 26 to 40%of the total porosity of the top 22.5 cmof soil and5 to 7%in the 22.5- to 112.5-cm depth. Cation movementwas measured during a 2-yr period in a field experimentthat examinedthe effects of various rates andtimingof K fertilization (and blanket applications of Ca and Mg)and stover removal on soil K, Ca, and Mgpools. Results show that amountsequivalent to 1%of the K, 5%of the Ca, and24%of the Mgthat were applied as fertilizer nutrients accumu- lated in the 30- to 90-cmdepth. Anaverage of 33%of the K, 26% of the Ca, and8%of the Mgapplied as fertilizers werenot accounted for in the soil or by crop biomass and probably leached below the 90-cmdepth. Weconclude that is difficult to chemically ameliorate the subsoil below the 30-cm depth and hypothesize that macropore flow through the soil and a continually wet subsoil are the major factors limiting subsoil cation accumulation. Basic CA37~ONSare usually lowin the highly weathered, acid soils of the humidtropics and replenishing the soil cation pool with lime and fertilizers is relatively costly. Improperly managedagricultural systems result in the inefficient use or loss of soil cations through excessive removal in biomass and from leaching losses (Gill and Kamprath, 1990; Wonget al., 1992). In some cases, base cation leaching is desirable whenthe depth of rooting of Al-sensitive crops is limited by a high Al- saturated subsoil. Calciumaccumulation can reduce the effects of subsoil acidity, thus allowing deeper crop root growth to tap subsoil water during periods of surface soil moisture deficit (Ritchey et al., 1980). Cation Leaching from the Zone of Application The amountand degree of cation leaching in soils of the humidtropics ranges widely and reflects the various factors that control leaching. For example, Ca move- ment is promoted by applying Ca in forms that include a mobile anion, such as CaSO4or CaCI2, rather than as T.S. Dierolf, Jalan KehakimanNo. 283, Bukittinggi, West Sumatra, Indonesia 26136; L.M. Arya, 3455 Lebon Rd., Apt. 1535, San Diego, CA;R.S. Yost, Dep. of .Agronomyand Soil Science, Univ. of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96822. Worksupported by the Ctr. for Soil and Agrocli- mate Res. (CSAR), Bogor, Indonesia, and the Soil ManagementCol- laborative Res. Support Program (USAID). Received 29 Apr. 1996. *Corresponding author (rsyost@hawaii.edu). Published in Agron. J. 89:572-579 (1997). CaCO3 (Ritchey et al., 1980), and by the addition acidifying N fertilizers (Pearson et al., 1962). The amount of cumulative rainfall and drainage has been related to the decrease in surface-soil cations (Cahnet al., 1993;Ayarzaet al., 1991). Significant leaching losses are likely to occur only if the soil ion exchangecapacity is exceeded, as whenlarge amountsof cations are added in fertilizers (Friesen et al., 1982; Gill and Kamprath, 1990). Cropped plots reportedly showedreduced cation leaching as compared with bare plots, presumably be- cause of the effect of plants on soil drying (reducing drainage) and nutrient recycling (Wonget al., 1992). Subsoil Cation Accumulation Reports of subsoil cation accumulation seem to pre- dominate from regions with ustic soil moisture regimes or where substantial subsoil drying can occur. In sepa- rate studies on a clayey Typic Haplustox in Brazil, K accumulated to depths of 75 cm (Souza et al., 1979; Fageria et al., 1990), and Ca and Mgcontents increased to a depth of 75 cm(Ritchey et al., 1980). Almost all of the limestone wasaccounted for in the surface 60 cm in the latter study. Poss and Saragoni (1992) reported Mgaccumulated to a depth of 80 cm in a sandy Typic Eutrustox in Togo. On a clayey Typic Haplorthox in Puerto Rico, Ca and Mgaccumulated in the 45- to 60- cmdepth by 2 yr after application of high rates of CaCO3 and (NH4)2SO4 (Pearson et al., 1962). Mixedresults are reported from soils with udic mois- ture regimes. Soil K did not increase below 30 cmin a clayey Typic Haplorthox in Indonesia (Gill and Kam- prath, 1990). Theauthors reported that K equivalent to 24%of the 480 kg K ha-1 applied was leached to below the 90-cmdepth. Fifteen years of continuous cropping and fertilization of a Typic Paleudult in Yurimaguas, Peru, resulted in an increase of Ca and Mgonly to the 20- to 40-cm depth (Alegre and Sanchez, 1991). However, Ayarza et al. (1991) reported that 2700 of rain wassufficient to accumulateK in the 60- to 100- cm depth of a fine-loamy Typic Paleudult from Yurima- guas. Theywere able to account for the entire applica- tion amount of 150 kg K ha-1 within the surface 100 cm.Friesen et al. (1982)calculated that nearly all of the Ca contained in as much as 4 MgCa(OH)2 -I was recovered in the surface 90 cmof soil by 3 yr after liming a coarse-textured Typic Paleudult in Nigeria. Macropore Flow and Subsoil Water Status Well-structured soils, whichare characteristic of Siti- ung, Indonesia, often exhibit macropore water flow (Anderson and Bouma, 1977). Macropore flow allows percolating water to pass through the soil without com- pletely displacing the resident soil water contained in micropores (Beven and Germann, 1982). Water flowing Abbreviations: ECEC,effective cation exchange capacity. 572
  • 3. DIEROLF ET AL.: WATERANDCATION MOVEMENTIN AN INDONESIANULTISOL 573 in saturated macropores can movesolutes into unsatu- rated micropores, whereas saturated micropores will largely, except for somediffusion, be bypassed by the water and solutes (Youngs and Leeds-Harrison, 1990). Thus, the degree of micropore saturation in the subsoil can influence the movementof drainage water and sol- utes, and maypartly explain the range of results on subsoil cation accumulation discussed in the previous section. For example, if a subsoil is dry, and the micro- pores are not filled with water, it is possible that water carrying cations from the surface layer will enter these pores and result in subsoil cation accumulation. The Brazilian savanna, where the Oxisols mentioned previously are located (Souza et al., 1979; Ritchey et al., 1980; Fageria et al,, 1990), undergoesa 3- to 6-too dry period that encourages drying out of the subsoil. Similarly, the subsoil of the Oxisol from Puerto Rico (Pearson et al., 1962) can dry to the permanentwilting point (Bouldin, 1979). The subsoil cation accumulation reported at both sites may have been promoted by a relatively dry subsoil that allowedfor water and nutrient movementinto subsoil micropore space. In contrast, the Oxisols and Ultisols of Peru (Alegre and Sanchez, 1991; Ayarzaet al., 1991), Indonesia (Gill and Kamprath,1990), and Nigeria (Friesen et al., 1982), referred to previously, have an udic moisture regime with an evenly distributed annual rainfall. The mixed results on subsoil cation accumulation reported from these areas maybe a result of the effect that subsoil texture and structure can have on subsoil drying. For example, the clayey subsoil of an Ultisol in Indonesia that is similar to and geographically near to the one reported on by Gill and Kamprath (1990) maintained a high pore saturation even during an uncommon36-d drought (Arya et al., 1992). Thecoarse-textured Ultisol in Nigeria (Friesen et al., 1982) mayhave allowed for moresubsoil drying, thus letting water and nutrients moveinto the subsoil micropore space. The previously mentioned reports emphasized the movementand accumulation of cations, but they did not provide detailed information on the nature of water flow through the respective soil. Ourobjective was to characterize water movementin a highly weathered soil of the humidtropics and to relate this to the movement and subsoil accumulation of basic cations in a 2-yr field experiment. MATERIALS AND METHODS Site Characteristics Field experimentswereconductednear the village of Siti- ung1A,WestSumatra,Indonesia(102° E, 1° S). Therainforest originally coveringthe site wascut and cleared by bulldozer in 1976.Afterthree seasonsof rice (Oryzasativa L.), the field wasfallowedand then becamedominatedby alang-alanggrass [Imperatacylindrica (L.) Raeusch.]. Thealang-alang was sprayedwith herbicide andthen cut and removed.Thesurface 15 cmwas plowed and alang-alang roots were removed. A soil pedonin an adjacent,unplowedarea wastentatively classi- fied as a clayey, kaolinitic, isohyperthermicTypicKanhaplu- dult (Table1). Initial levels of extractablecations fromsoil of a nearbyexperimentwere(in cmolckg-1) 0.73 Ca, 0.18 K, 0.29 Mg,and 4.63 AI+Hfor the surface 15 cm,and 0.25 Ca, 0.05 K, 0.07 Mg,and 4.01 AI+Hfor the 15- to 30-cmdepth. Surfacesoil organicCwas27.1 g kg-1, andpHwas4.9 in H20 and 3.9 in 1 MKC1.Rainfall ranges from 2500to 3000mm yr-~ and averages morethan 200mmper monthfrom October to May,and from 100 to 200 mmfrom June to September. Internal Drainage Internal drainagewasmeasuredin a 17.2m2 plot delineated with plastic sheeting to a depth of 1.5 m. Twodiagonally opposed quadrants were each instrumented with a neutron probeaccess tube and tensiometersinstalled at depths from 7.5 to 120cmin 15-cmdepth increments. Theneutron probe wascalibrated in both an emptyand a full water tank to determinethe slope of the regression equation for relating neutroncountto volumetricwatercontent (0). Theintercept of the equation wascalculated fromthe soil core-measured bulk density and fromthe gravimetric water content of soil that wassampledwhile taking neutron counts. Theplot wasirrigated with 71 mmof water 2 d before the drainage test, to ensure maximumwetnessand moisture uniformity.For the test, the plot wasirrigated with 72.5mm of waterappliedwith sprinklingcansduringa 100-minperiod. After irrigation ceased, the plot surface wascoveredwith a plastic sheet anda shelter. Valuesof 0 at depthsfrom7.5 to 112.5 cmwere measuredwith a neutron probe. The0 of the 0- to 7.5-cmdepth wasdeterminedfromperiodic gravimetric sampling.Soil matric potential wasmeasuredwith a portable transducer. Tensiometer and neutron probe readings were takenat several-minuteintervals initially andthen less fre- quentlyup to 963h after irrigation ceased. Total water content for a soil layer wasdetermined by multiplyingthe volumetricwater content by the layer thick- ness. Total water fromthe soil surface to a soil depth z was obtained by summingthe total water content for each of the Table 1. Soil profile description for the study soil, near the village of Sitiung, WestSumatra,Indonesia.~" Horizon Depth Color Texture~ Particlesize][ Structure§ sand clay cm A 0- 12 10YR3/4 sicl Btl 12- 35 10YR4/4 d Bt2 35- 72 7.SYR4/4 cl Bt3 72- 97 7.SYR4/6 cl Bt4 97-143 5YR518 d Bt5 143-160 5YR518 cl ffm sbk 8 62 f/m sbk 11 66 f/m sbk 6 73 f/m sbk 7 65 ffm sbk 7 54 ffm sbk 7 52 "~ Dataprovidedby the Ctr. for Soil andAgroclimateRes. (CSAR),Bogor, Indonesia. ~:si, silty;ci, clay. § f, fine; m, medium;sbk, subangularblocky. ][ Pipette methodafter sonification in sodiumhexametaphosphate.
  • 4. 574 AGRONOMYJOURNAL,VOL.89, JULY-AUGUST1997 soil layers to depth z. Hydraulic conductivities at the various depths were calculated by combining Darcy’s law and the equation of continuity (Hillel et al., 1972) with computed values of volumetric water content and soil matric potential. Waterfluxes were calculated from changes in total water con- tent with time or drainage curves. The volumetric water con- tent at field capacity for each depth interval wasdetermined from curves fit to the change in volumetric water content with time. The drained-pore volumeat field capacity was used to estimate the macroporosity. A similar approach has been used on soil cores (Germannand Beven, 1981). Our definition macroporosity probably also includes somemesopores, which Luxmoore(1981) defined as pores which hold water between -0.3 and -30 kPa. Soil Moisture Release Curves Watercontents for matric potentials -< 100 kPa were deter- minedon field samples. Soil cores were sampledat soil depths of 10, 25, and 60 cm, adjacent to tensiometers that were in- stalled at the respective depth. Undisturbed soil cores (77 mrn in diam., by 40 mmhigh) were sampled at midpoint depths of 2, 10, 25, and 60 cmand were placed in pressure chambers to measure water contents at matric potentials up to -400 kPa. Macroporosity wasalso estimated from the soil moisture release curve by determining the volumetric water content at the soil matric potential measuredat field capacity during the internal drainage experiment. Potassium Management Experiment A field experiment was conducted to quantify the changes in soil cation pools as affected by various stover management and Kfertilization managementpractices. Arange of K inputs and outputs was obtained in the soil system by varying KC1 applications and by either removingor returning crop biomass. Nine treatments were arranged in a randomized complete block design with four replications (Table 2). Plots measured 42 m2, with a 12 m2 harvest area. Basal fertilizers totaling (in kg ha-~) 170 P (as TSP), 240 N (as urea), 46 Mg(as MgSO4), 10 Zn (as ZnSO4), and 15 B (as borate) were applied during the experiment. Calcium carbonate to reduce A1 saturation to 25%(1.3 to 2.7 IVlg ha-1, dependingon individual plot soil analyses) wasapplied before the first crop and an additional 2 Mgha-a was applied before the sixth crop. Basal lime and fertilizer treatments were incorporated into the surface 15 cm of soil. Six crops (cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]--cowpea- rice-soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]-rice-soybean) were grown in sequence from May 1989 to May 1991. Nutrient removalin harvested grain and stover wascalculated by multi- plying percent composition by dry weight of the respective fractions. Soil samples were taken (five 10-cm-diam.cores per Table 2. Treatmentsfor the Kmanagementexperiment. Treatment Total K Application Stover code applied timing-~ management kg Kha-t 1 70 single returned 2 250 single returned 3 250 split returned 4 600 split returned 5 70 single removed 6 250 single removed 7 250 split removed 8 600 split removed 9~ 215 split removed Single,all fertilizerwasappliedtothefirstcrop.Split,fertilizerwassplit over sev/eral crops. 150kgKha-~ appliedas KCIfertilizer, remainderappliedas cattle manure. 66 "E64 6O -0.4017Ln(x)+64.154 0.9032 200 400 600 800 1000 Time(hours) Fig. 1. Drainagecurveshowingtotal watercontentfor the0 to 112.5- cmdepthas a functionof timefrom0.07to 963h after irrigation with72.5 mmof waterduringa 100-rainperiod(symbolsrepresent tworeplications). plot) before fertilizing the first crop and after harvesting the final crop in 15-cmincrements to a depth of 90 cm. Extractable soil cation values were converted to massequiv- alents (kg ha-~) by using the respective bulk densities. The cation accumulation for a depth increment was calculated as the difference between initial and final soil mass equivalent values. The amountof applied cation that was not recovered within the 90-cmdepth or in harvested biomass (D) was calcu- lated using D = a - b - c, where a is the total amount of cation applied as fertilizer, b is the amountof cation removed in harvested biomass, and c is the cation accumulation within the 0- to 90-cmdepth. Aseparate laboratory incubation study determined that less than 10%of K added as fertilizer KCI to this soil taken from the 0- to 15- and 15- to 30-cmdepths may not be recovered by 1 MNH4OAcextraction (Dierolf, 1992). Thus, to simplify the discussion, we assumedthat all of the K, Ca, and Mgnot recovered in the soil (c) or accounted for in crop removal (b), was lost to leaching (D). Cations were extracted from soil samples with 1 M NHaOAc.The soil extracts were analyzed for cations by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. The harvest fraction of each crop was analyzed for nutrient content by the University of Hawaii’s Agricultural Diagnostic Services Center. Samples were dry ashed at 550°C and nutrients were determined by inductively coupled plasma emission spectrometry. Linear re- gression and analysis of variance were conducted using the Statistix analytical software(Statistix, 1992). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Hydraulic Properties Water Drainage The total soil water content in the 0- to 112.5-cm depth decreased sharply within 6 h after the 100-min Table3. Drainageof water fromthe 0- to 112.5-cmsoil depth for several times (t) after the applicationof 72.5 mmof water (P) duringa 100-minperiod in the drainageexperiment. t WS~" P WS,t D~ AWD~ h cm % 0.07 63.01(0.28)§ 7.25 65.33(0.75) 4.93 68 6 63.01(0.28) 7.25 63.45(0.29) 6.81 94 24 63.01(0.28) 7.25 62.87(0.16) 7.39 102 Initial waterstorage(WSi)is total waterpresentin profile prior irrigation.Waterstorageat timet (WS,)is thepredictedtotal water contenttakenfromregressionequationssuchas shownin Fig. 1. Drainage(D) is calculatedas D= WSI+ P - WS,andappliedwater drainedbelow112.5cm(AWD)is calculatedas D/P. Valuesin parenthesesare standarddeviations.
  • 5. DIEROLF ET AL.: WATERANDCATION MOVEMENTIN AN INDONESIANULTISOL 575 ~._.0.70 L ’o E ~ ~ o.o y =-0.0357Ln(x)+ 0.6397 ~o.5o’- ~ ~ y = -O.0392Ln(x)* 0.4534 ~ R2 = 0.9861 lO lOO lOOO Matricpotential(-kPa) Fig. 2. ttydradic conductivity at the 22.5- andll2.5-cm depths as a function of the averagevolumetricwatercontent for the respective 15-cm depth increment above each depth. The 22.5-cm depth was unreplicated due to tensiometer failure. Symbolsrepresent calcu- lated values for each replication at the 22.5-cm(solid circles) and the 52.5-cm (open, solid squares) depths. irrigation period ceased (Fig. 1). However,the change in soil watershownin Fig. 1 represents drainageequal to only 32%of the applied water, because 68%of the applied water had drained (AWD)past the 112.5-cm depthwithin 4.2 minafter irrigation hadceased(Table 3). Six hoursafter irrigation ceased, about94%of the applied water had drained below 112.5 cm. Hydraulic conductivities at various depths initially ranged from 2 to 8 cmh-1, but decreased abruptly with a slight dropin the watercontent(Fig. 2). For example, after 24 h of drainage, the volumetric water content at the 112.5-cm depth decreased from an initial value of 0.622 cm3 cm-3 to 0.606 cm3 cm-3, while the hydraulic conductivity decreased from 8.03 cmh-] to about 0.06 cm Water Content and Retention Watercontent at field capacity (at 24 h after irrigation ceased) increased with depth (Table 4). Morewater retained at a given matric potential in the 55- to 65- cmdepth than in the 0- to 4-cm depth (Fig. 3). The macroporosityrangedfrom26 to 40%of the total poros- ity in the surface 22.5 cmand 5 to 7%in the subsoil. Macroporosities determined from the water retention data (0 to 4 cm = 40%, 5 to 15 cm = 22%, 20 to 30 10 8 o.ol 0.001 0.0001 log Y=~24~6C3mx-76.79 = /. ! 112.5 cm "~ t~ log Y =~- 82.12 E ~ R= = 0.795 0.650.45 0.50 0.55 0.60 Volumetricwatercontent(cm3 cm"3) Fig. 3. Soil moisture release curves determined on field (open squares) and core (solid squares) samples at the 55 to 65-cmdepth andfor core (solid circles) samplesat the 0 to 4-cmdepth. Regres- sion statistics for the twodepths not shownin the figure are: 5 to 15 cm, Y = -0.06 iogX + 0.55, Rz = 0.685, n = 41; 20 to 30 cm, Y = -0.02 IogX + 0.55, Rz = 0.303, n = 41. Except for the 0- to 4-cm depth, the data points at -400 kPa werenot included in the regression analyses. cm = 10%,and 55 to 65 cm = 4%), were similar to those determined at field capacity in the drainage experiment (Table 4). Thesoil matric potential at field capacity generally decreased with depth and ranged from -4.6 kPa at 7.5 cm to -1.8 kPa at 105 cm(Table 4). Evenafter 963 of drainage, the soil matric potential did not exceed -10.0 kPa (data not shown). Irrigation did not signifi- cantly increase subsoil pore saturation, becausethe ini- tial pore saturation was already high and remained so even after 963 h of drainage (Table 5). Hydraulic Conductivity Conductivities determined from the drainage experi- ment confirm that a large volume of water can move rapidly throughthis soil (Fig. 2). Aryaet al. (1993) reported high field-saturated hydraulic conductivities, ranging from 2 to morethan 9 cmh-1, in an experiment conducted near the present experiment. The ability of this clay-textured soil to rapidly transmit water, as im- plied by saturated conductivityanddrainagerates (Ta- ble 3) and by the sharp drop in the total water content curves over time (Fig. 1), suggests the presence of mac- ropore flow. Table 4. Bulk density (BD), particle density (PD), porosity (P), and soil matric potential (~), volumetric water content (0), and macroporosity (MP) at field capacity for several depths. Mean Atfield capacity§ depth BD PD? P~ 0 0¶ MP# cm gem-3 cmJ cm-3 kPa em3 cm-~ % 3.75?? 0.91 (0.03)$$ 2.61 (0.01) 0.651 -4.6 (0.8)$$ 0.389(0.005) 40 15 0.9310.06) 2.70 (0.08) 0.656 -4.4 (0.9) 0.486 (0.020) 26 30 1.09(0.03) 2.72(0.02) 0.599 -3.5 (0.9) 0.569(0.013) 5 45 1.05(0.05) 2.75 (0.01) 0.618 -3.4 (0.7) 0.578(0.009) 7 60 1.03(0.03) 2.72(0.06) 0.621 -2.6 (0.6) 0.579(0.008) 7 75 1.00(0.04) 2.72 (0.04) 0.632 -2.9 (0.7) 0.587(0.008) 7 90 1.01(0.02) 2.80(0.03) 0.639 -2.3 (0.7) 0.596(0.007) 7 105 0.97(0.02) 2.75 (0.05) 0.647 -1.8 (0.9) 0.602(0.007) 7 Meanof three samples using pycnometer method. P = 1 - (BD/PD). Values at field opacity weredeterminedfromthe internal drainageexperiment. Meanvolumetricwatercontent(24 h after irrigation ceased)predictedfromregression equations that werefit to drainagecurvesfor eachdepthincrement. [1 - (volumetric water content/P)] x 100. ?? Tensiometermidpointlocated at 7.5 cmfor this depth. :~:~ Valuesin parenthesesare standarddeviations (for BDand PD)or standarderrors (for 0 and 0).
  • 6. 576 AGRONOMYJOURNAL,VOL. 89, JULY-AUGUST1997 Table 5. Pore saturation (volumetric water content/porosity) pro- files at several times during drainage after a 100-min irrigation period with 72.5 mmof water. Soil depth Pre-irrigafion 0.6 22.7 963 LSD(0.05)’~ cm cm3 cm-3 0- 7.5 0.575 0.648 0.599 0.548 0.022 %5- 22.5 0.739 0.782 0.733 0.718 NS 22.5- 37.5 0.952 0.978 0.945 0.930 NS 37.5- 52.5 0.945 0.945 0.928 0.915 NS 52.5- 67.5 0.944 0.947 0.924 0.919 NS 67.5- 82.5 0.934 0.96I 0.918 0.914 0.002 82.5- 97.5 0.929 0.951 0.933 0.921 NS 97.5-112.5 0.935 0.941 0.932 0.911 NS ~ LSDsfor time effects at each depth. Macropore Flow Results of the internal drainage (Table 4) and water retention experiments (Fig. 3) showthat this soil con- tains both pores that drain water rapidly under high soil matric potential and pores that retain a large amount of water under low soil matric potential. Soils that ex- hibit this type of behavior are considered to have two domains (Brusseau and Rao, 1990), mobile and immo- bile. Themobile domainhas a higher conductivity than the immobile domain. The macroporosity (representing the mobile domain) does not have to comprise a large fraction of the total pore volumeto greatly affect water infiltration and redistribution (White, 1985). Radulov- ich et al. (1989) reported that macropores comprised only 0.075 to 0.091 m3 m-3 of the total volume of a soil with an average infiltration rate of 39 cmh-~. The macroporosity shownin Table 4 is based on pore size, and is not evidencethat all of this pore space contributes to macroporeflow (Skopp, 1981). Additionally, because field soils do not usually saturate completely, the pore volume contributing to macropore flow is probably lower than the macroporosity shown in Table 4 (Arya et al., 1993). Wespeculate that the most likely route for the rapid downwarddrainage in this soil is flow along the ped faces (Boumaet al., 1977) that are a feature of the subangular blocky structure in the subsoil (Table 1). Field observations madeat our experimental site sug- gest that a small change in subsoil volumetric water content of about 0.05 cm3 cm-3 resulted in the appear- ance of fracture planes amongpeds. The change in the macroporosity and pore saturation that occurs between the 15- and 30-cmdepths (Tables 4 and 5) corresponds to the A-Bhorizon transition zone Table 6. Calculation of K, Ca, and Mgrecovery at 24 mo after initiation of the K management experiment. Changein soli’~ Stover a, applied b, removed Treatment no. management as fertilizer in 6 crops (0-30 cm) (30-90 cm) D, cation not recovered~ 1 returned 70 101 - 53 3 returned 250 107 32 6 returned 250§ 99 56 8 returned 600 112 224 2 removed 70 161 -29 5 removed 215 232 -62 4 removed 250 246 -56 7 removed 250§ 240 -40 9 removed 600 323 81 K, kg ha-1 -14 6 2 5 -1 -14 0 5 -4 36 105 93 259 -61 59 46 45 200 LSD(0.05)¶ 15.9 54.0 NS 68.5 CV, % 6.1 231.3 10.0 50.7 Ca, kg ha-1 Mg, kg ha-t 1 returned 1454 33 962 3 returned 1508 34 955 6 returned 1593 34 1159 8 returned 1576 34 1168 2 removed 1539 91 972 5 removed 1544 120 991 4 removed 1548 112 888 7 removed 1533 124 939 9 removed 1519 121 816 LSD(0.05) 7.6 NS CV, % 6.8 21.7 17 55 73 130 113 30 65 91 48 NS 104.8 10 2O 24 12 4 12 11 -4 NS 126~, 1 returned 46 22 14 3 returned 46 20 3 6 returned 46 21 20 8 returned 46 20 9 2 removed 46 29 0 5 removed 46 39 8 4 removed 46 34 - 10 7 removed 46 37 -1 9 removed 46 35 5 LSD(0.05) 3.1 NS CV, % 7.5 224.9 442 464 327 244 363 4O3 483 379 534 NS 61.5 0 3 -24 5 4 -5 13 -3 10 NS 2525.2 Increase or decrease (negative values) in soil cation between0 and 24 too. D = a - b - c~e - c90. Cation not recovered is assumedlost to leaching; negative values indicate a net increase. Split application. LSDfor treatment differences.
  • 7. DIEROLF ET AL.: WATER AND CATION MOVEMENTIN AN INDONESIAN ULTISOL 577 (Table 1). Quisenberry and Phillips (1976) found water percolated as a front through topsoil until it reached untilled subsoil where water then moved through macropore channels. In another soil, they showedevidence of water building up at the tilled- untilled soil interface until enoughpositive head devel- oped to allow water to enter larger subsoil macropores. This clayey soil retained large amountsof water, espe- cially in the subsoil, evenafter several weeksof drainage (Table 5). Evenwhenthe subsoil soil matric potential reached -100 kPa, the water retention curves for the subsoil depths showedthat very little water wasreleased between field capacity (-1.3 to -3.8 kPa) and -100 kPa (Fig. 3). Subsoil water contents of soils in Sitiung can remain high even under typical field conditions. For example, during a 36-d drought for a cowpeacrop, pore saturation at the 60-cm depth ranged from 70 to 80% (Arya et al., 1992). In another experiment, the soil ma- tric potential reached only -55 kPa at the 52.5-cmdepth for a maize(Zea maysL.) crop planted on soils limed to the 50-cmdepth during a dry period (Arya et al., 1992). In summary, micropores predominate the subsoil pore space in Sitiung soils, and these micropores are usually water-filled. The subsoil water contained in these micropores is not easily removed, even under nor- malfield conditions, resulting in a subsoil that is usually wet. Moist or wet soil is associated with high bypass flowdue to relatively lowinfiltration rates of percolating water into the water-filled soil matrix (Bouma,1991). Wespeculate that most of nutrient-carrying water that drains throughthe soil profile will not displace signifi- cant amountsof subsoil water held in the soil matrix. Thus, most of the percolating water, and the solutes movingwith it, will bypassthe subsoil pores in this soil. It follows, then, that subsoil cation accumulation will have to rely on the muchslower process of diffusion. Measurement of Cation Leaching and Accumulation Surface Soil Cation Losses A total of 6880 mmof rain was recorded during the 24-mo period of the field experiment. The amount of K not recovered was assumed to have leached. The amount of K not recovered depended on the treatment and ranged from a loss of 259kg Kha-1 to a net increase of 61 kg K ha-1 (Table 6). Theamount of K not recov- ered or leached K ranged from 0 (Treatment 2) to 51% (Treatment 1), and averaged 33%for all treatments. Leaching losses were generally greater at the highest total K fertilization rate (600 kg K ha-1 or 120 kg K ha-1 crop-1) than where less K was applied. This con- trasts with results from an Oxisol in the Sitiung area, where large K leaching losses did not occur at rates of 120 kg K ha-l; there, losses were reported only when 240 kg K ha-1 was applied per crop (Gill and Kam- prath, 1990). Calcium leaching losses were not affected by treat- ments. Anaverage of 404 kg Ca ha-1 leached below the 90-cm depth and losses averaged 26%of the applied Ca considering all treatments. Magnesiumleaching losses did not significantly differ amongtreatments and losses averaged about 8%of the applied Mg. The rela- tive mobility of the cations (Ca >> K > Mg) in this field experimentis similar to the relative cation concen- trations determined in leachates from zero-tension ly- simeters used in another experiment at the study site (Dierolf, 1992). Subsoil Cation Accumulation Both Ca, applied in larger doses than K, and Mg, applied in smaller doses than K, resulted in greater accumulation of cations in the 30- to 90-cmdepth than did K (Table 6). Although Ca ions accumulated in the greatest absolute amountin the 30- to 90-cmdepth, the accumulated Ca was equal to only 5%of that applied. Comparing treatments of 0.375 Mgand 5.0 Mglime ha-1 in two Oxisols in the Sitiung area, Gill (1988) re- ported an increase of 0.2 to 0.3 cmolcCakg-1 in the 30- to 50-cmdepth. This increase is equivalent to about 80 to 120 kg Ca ha-1 or 6 to 9%of the Ca applied in the treatment with 5 Mglime ha-L Amounts of Mgand K that accumulated in the 30- to 90-cmdepth were lower than for Ca (Table 6). How- ever, the percent of Mgaccumulating in the subsoil was 0.00 0 15 -~30 ° £ . .~ 45 75 90 0.10 ExchangeableCation (cmole kg"~) 0.20 0.30 0,0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 30 45 60 75 90 Initial ¯ Final ° OmO0 0 I 15 30 45 60 75 90 0.10 0.20 0.30 I ~ I ~ Fig. 4. Exchangeable K, Ca, and Mgin the soil profile before and after the application of (in kg ha -I) 600 K (as KCI), 1519 Ca (as CaCO3), and 46 Mg (as MgSO4) to six crops grown during a 24-mo period (Treatment 9). Horizontal bars show the standard errors of the mean four treatments.
  • 8. 578 AGRONOMY JOURNAL, VOL. 89, JULY-AUGUST 1997 the highest for the three cations, averaging 24% of the applied Mg considering all treatments. An average of less than 1% of the K applied as fertilizer accumulated in the 30- to 90-cm depth (Table 6). This result is similar to that reported by Gill and Kamprath (1990) on an Oxisol in the Sitiung area. In their study, K did not accumulate below the 30-cm depth even after a total of 240 kg K ha"1 was applied. Figure 4 shows the distribution of cations in the soil profile before and after the 24-mo experiment for the highest K treatment with stover removal (Treatment 9). There was only a significant increase of cations at the 0- to 15-cm and 15- to 30-cm depths. However, the amount of cations assumed leached beyond the 90-cm depth for Treatment 9 were (in kg ha"1 ) 200 K, 534 Ca, and 10 Mg (Table 6). Although a low effective cation exchange capacity reduces the capacity of a soil to retain cations, studies indicate that cation accumulation can occur in a low ECEC subsoil (Souza et al., 1979; Ritchey et al., 1980; Friesen et al., 1982; Fageria et al., 1990). The subsoil cation accumulation reported in these soils may be be- cause subsoil drying occurred as suggested by either the ustic moisture regime or coarse-texture of these soils. A dry subsoil is more conducive to the movement of water and cations into unsaturated micropores (Beven and Germann, 1982). Subsoil dryingwould also increase the possibility that the cations may be retained against subsequent leaching loss via macropore flow (Shipitalo et al., 1990). The soil studied in our experiments also has a low ECEC, but the subsoil is almost always water-filled. Thus, we propose that the major mechanism controlling the lack of subsoil accumulation of cations in our soil is macropore flow, which causes both water and nutri- ents to bypass the subsoil matrix. The likelihood of percolating water and nutrients movement into the mi- cropores that comprise the subsoil matrix is further re- duced because the micropores are usually water-filled. CONCLUSION We conclude that it is difficult, using commonly avail- able lime and fertilizers, to chemically improve the sub- soil below the 30-cm depth. We hypothesize that mac- ropore flow through the soil and a continually wet subsoil are the major factors limiting subsoil cation accu- mulation. Pushing nutrients into the subsoil below the 30-cm depth by increasing fertilizer rates or by applying more soluble forms may result in most of the nutrients by- passing the saturated subsoil micropores. Calcium and K were quite mobile in the soil we studied, because large quantitieswere not recovered by either soil extraction or in plant uptake and were assumed to have leached below 90cm. An alternative strategy for soil cation management in this acid Typic Kanhapludult might be to limit the target for chemical amelioration to the surface 30 cm. Roots of Al-tolerant crops such as rice and cowpea can tap the subsoil water without subsoil amendments. Growth of crops more sensitive to Al, such as maize, may already benefit from liming to the 30-cm depth. For example, Arya et al. (1992) showed that maize grain yield in Sitiung was already greatly improved when lime was distributed down to 30 cm, rather than to 10 cm. Our study showed that Ca from surface-applied lime will accumulate in the 15- to 30-cm depth and this may be sufficient to improve maize production.
  • 9. HOOKER ET AL.: ALTERNATIVE WEED CONTROL WITH CONSERVATION TILLAGE FOR SOYBEAN 579