The document discusses plans to develop Osaka Bay area in Japan through two major infrastructure projects - an Osaka Bay Rail Link and transforming Yumeshima island into a new city called Yumeshima Expo Park City. For the rail link, a subway line extending the existing Chuo Line through nearby islands is proposed, with details on proposed route, construction cost and expected ridership and revenue. Development plans for Yumeshima Expo Park City include zoning, transportation networks and disaster prevention measures for a proposed 2025 Expo and afterwards. Key infrastructure like residential, commercial and tourism areas are discussed along with cost analyses.

1. Alfaz Hossain - Tika Laras Kusuma - Htike Aung Kyaw – Alice Prax - Tadashi Uchihira
Exercise in Global Architecture
1

2. SUMMARY
A. Concept
B. Osaka Bay Rail Link
1. Subway Route
2. Cost, Revenue and Passengers
3. SWOT Analyses
C. Yumeshima Expo Park City
1. Master Plan
2. Zoning Area
3. Transportation in Yumeshima
4. Program
5. Disaster Prevention
2

3. CONCEPT
Strength : Osaka Bay has the new attractive space and in the same time its accommodated with
good public transportation
Weakness : The risk of money spent by government and residential built in Yumeshima may
facing the crisis
Opportunity : It will become new tourism spot and good income for government, public and private
sectors
Threats : Location of Yumeshima has the higher tsunami risk
• Osaka Bay area doesn’t have good
access for public – not integrated to
each other
夢
• Many of Land programming in Osaka Bay is
not that attractive because of the container
wharf
Problems?
Link The Osaka Bay Area Create One New Attractive Landmark Island
SWOT Analyze
3

4. Osaka Bay Rail Link
4

5. • Extension of the
Chuo Line from
Cosmo Square
Station through all
islands until
Tempozan.
• 3 New Stations to
be built on
Yumeshima,
Maishima and near
Universal Studio
Japan
SUBWAY ROUTE
5

6. • The Whole Loop Line
Length will be
around 12.2 km
• Existing Line Length
– Approx. 2.2 km
• Total Length of the
extension – Approx.
10 km
• The extension will be
fully underground
DETAILS
6

7. COST (CONSTRUCTION & OPERATIONAL)
• Construction Cost – ￥300 billion
• Operational & Maintenance Cost per Year –
￥3 billion
• Assuming Capital Recovery in 30 Years,
– Total Cost in 30 Years - ￥390 billion
7

8. REVENUE
• Assuming fare from each passenger - ￥180
• During Expo (6 Months)
– Revenue from visitors – ￥20.16 billion
– Revenue from residents – ￥1.09 billion
– Total Revenue in first 6 months - ￥21.25
billion
• After Expo (29.5 Years)
– Revenue to be made for capital recovery –
￥368.75 billion
– Revenue to be made per year – ￥12.5 billion
8
Percentage of Capital
Recovery
Revenue from Visitors During Expo
Revenue from Residents During Expo
Revenue from Visitors After Expo
Revenue from Residents After Expo

9. NUMBER OF PASSENGERS
• During Expo
– Out of 70 million visitors, 80% would use
subway
– Out of 45 thousand residents, 44% would
use subway
– After Expo
• Out of 24 million visitors (per year), 80%
would use subway
• Out of 120 thousand residents, 43% would
use subway
– According to the Survey, 44.4% of residents
commute by trains in Japan.
9
44%
17%
13%
9%
7%
3%
7%
Means of Commuting in
Japan
Train Car
Bicycle Bus
Walk Motorbike
Don't Commute
Ref: goo.gl/VngBc5

10. SWOT ANALYSIS ON SUBWAY SYSTEM
Strengths Weaknesses
• High Density of Population
• Better Connection Between
Islands
• Probable Future Developments
• Long Capital Recovery Duration
• Dependency on Number of
Visitors to Islands
Opportunities Threats
• Expo 2025
• Opportunity to Extend Service to
New Island
• Waterfront and Bay Area Where
Disasters Such As Tsunami,
Typhoon and Floods Can Occur
10

11. Yumeshima EXPO Park City
夢
11

12. EXPO Zone
Zone (B)
Residential Zone
Zone (C)
Welcoming Zone
Zone (A)
Commercial Zone
Zone (D)
Pool Dome Zone
Zone (E)
1ST MASTERPLAN : EXPO 2025
12

13. EXPO Park Zone
Zone (B)
Residential Zone
Zone (C)
Welcoming Zone
Zone (A)
Commercial Zone
Zone (D)
Pool Dome Zone
Zone (E)
13
2ND MASTERPLAN : AFTER THE EXPO

14. EXPO
Entrance
Hotel
Parking
Apartments
School
Shopping
Mall
Solar
Panel
Roof
People’s
Plaza
Bayside
Park
World
EXPO
Exclusive
Area
Osaka Pool Dome
Station
(underground)
Exit 1-5
14
ZONING : EXPO 2025

15. City
Hall
Tourism
Centre
Hotel
Parking
Apartments
School
Shopping
Mall
Solar
Panel
Roof
People’s
Plaza
Bayside
Park
EXPO
Park City
(Comm,
Museum, etc)
Osaka Pool Dome
Station
(underground)
Exit 1-5
15
ZONING : AFTER EXPO

16. 16
BUS ROUTE : EXPO 2025

17. 17
BUS ROUTE : AFTER EXPO 2025

18. 1 bus OPEX 1km for 600yen (average operational cost in Osaka)
CAPEX 20 million yen (a large bus: 15 years operation)
one cycle length Time
4.2km (during the expo) 15mins
5.3km (after the expo) 20mins
Working hour 10 hours for a day
Tickets fare 150 yen for one way (any stop)
Ref. [http://www.bus.or.jp/about/pdf/h26_busjigyo.pdf]
During Expo: 66
people/h
After Expo: 62 people/h
2 buses operation
During Expo: every
7.5mins
After Expo: every 10mins
18
COST ANALYSES

19. Strengths Weaknesses
- Transport people efficiently
- Development of ecosystem
- Decreasing accidents
- Covered area is small
- Large initial investments
- The number of people, using
buses per hour, is higher than the
average
Opportunites Threats
- Optimization of network
- Subsidy from the city
- Achieving smart city
- There might be free shuttle bus
for casino
- People might walk or use
bicycles
19
SWOT ANALYSES

20. Strengths Weaknesses
• Fast and cheap
construction
• Many activities still
used after the expo
• Long Capital
Recovery Duration
• Dependency on
Number of Visitors to
Islands
Opportunities Threats
• Expo 2025
• Connect the objects
on the island with the
building
• Waterfront and Bay
Area Where Disasters
: Tsunami, Typhoon
and Floods Can Occur
Reference :
Name of the project : Puma City
Location : Multiple Global Ports (Alicante
(Spain), Boston (USA), Stockholm (Sweden) )
Architect : LOT-EK Architecture & Design
Cost : 132 Millions of ¥
Construction Time : 20 days
20
TOURISM CENTER

21. Strengths Weaknesses
• A lot of activities on
the island
• Having an apartement
in front of the bay
• Far from City Center
• Dependency on
Number of people who
will live here.
Opportunities Threats
• Develop Solar
technology
• Create residential
area for industrial
workers
• Waterfront and Bay
Area Where Disasters
: Tsunami, Typhoon
and Floods Can Occur
Reference:
Name of the project : Solar settlement
Freiburg
Location : Freiburg, Germany
Architect : Rolf disch Solar Architecture
Cost : 1,6 Billion ¥ x 10
Description of users : People who worked
on the Island – Find them a place to live.
21
RESIDENTIAL AREA

22. Reference :
Name of the project : Beaugrenelle
Location : Paris
Architect : Valode & Pistre
Cost : 5.5 Billions ¥
Description of users : Local people and
tourists can buy everything they need
Construction Time : 4 years
Strengths Weaknesses
• The local and the
tourists will need this
space
• Diverse activities in
one place
• Long Capital
Recovery Duration
• Dependency on
Number of Visitors to
Islands
Opportunities Threats
• Expo 2025
• Create a beautiful
space in front of the
bay
• Waterfront and Bay
Area Where Disasters
: Tsunami, Typhoon
and Floods Can Occur
22
SHOPPING MALL

23. Name of the project : Ocean Dome
Location : Miyazaki, Japan
Architect : Taro Ashihara Architects
Cost : 420 B. of ¥
Description of users : People who want to
enjoy a beach without the polluting water.
Visits : 1.24 Million per Years
Construction Time : 3 years (2010-2013)
Strengths Weaknesses
• Enjoy a safe beach
• Creating an attraction
and economic
activities on the island
• Long Capital
Recovery Duration
• Dependency on
Number of Visitors to
Islands
Opportunities Threats
• Develop aquatic
activities
• Opportunity to Extend
Service to New Island
• Waterfront and Bay
Area Where Disasters:
Tsunami, Typhoon and
Floods Can Occur
23
ARTIFICIAL BEACH

24. Strengths Weaknesses
• The local and the
tourists will need this
space
• Diverse activities in
one place
• Long Capital
Recovery Duration
• Dependency on
Number of Visitors to
Islands
Opportunities Threats
• Expo 2025
• Create a beautiful
space in front of the
bay
• Waterfront and Bay
Area Where Disasters
: Tsunami, Typhoon
and Floods Can Occur
References:
Name of the project : Park Royal Hotel
Location : Singapore
Architect : WOHA
Cost : 3 B. of ¥
Description of users : People who want
to enjoy the view and the park
Construction Time : 5 years (2008-
2013)
24
YUMESHIMA HOTEL

25. Reference :
Name of the project : Panther Lake
Elementary School
Location : Washington state, USA
Architect : DLR group
Cost : 1.4 B. of ¥
Construction Time : 3 years (2006-2009)
Strengths Weaknesses
• High Density of
Population
• Provide an education
to the people on the
island
• Long Capital
Recovery Duration
• Dependency on
Number of Visitors to
Islands
Opportunities Threats
• For children living on
the island
• Way to Extend child
activities on the Island
• Waterfront and Bay
Area Where Disasters
: Tsunami, Typhoon
and Floods Can Occur
25
PRIMARY SCHOOL

26. 26
TOTAL COST
Potential Client Program Price in Yen
Government Financial Hotel 3 900 000 000
Support For Osaka
Expo 2025
Tourism center 132 000 000
Shopping mall 5 500 000 000
Industrial Fiancial Artificial Beach 420 000 000 000
Support Residential area 10 600 000 000
Osaka city Financial
suport
Primary School 1 400 000 000
TOTAL : 861, 532 Billions

27. Expected tsunami height around 5.7 meter. And expected to reach the Port in about 110 mins.
• Build the building with the height more than 10 m with
strong structure.
• Building equipped with evacuation rooftop.
• Make evacuation map and put it all around the city.
• Ex : EXPO Entrance Building, Hotel, Apartment, Mall.
Background
Strategy
People need 60 mins for evacuation to the top of buildings and
maximal 4 hours needed for help reach the evacuation buildings.
SWOT Analyze
27
Strengths Weaknesses
• Using the existents buildings for evacuation
doesn’t need special money for building
special evacuation places
• Hard to lead people during evacuation in
normal buildings. People might panic during
the evacuation if they don’t understand the
safety map
Opportunities Threats
• Make the new concept for evacuation system
and giving opportunity for more customer to
point evacuation buildings
• There is the possibility for the failure of
structure of evacuation buildings
DISASTER PREVENTION

28. Thank you for listening
ご清聴ありがとうございました
28