2. TEAM MEMBERS:
V.AKILAN
M.P.MALAR RAJAN
D.MANI KANDAN
M.SWAMI NATHAN
PROJECT GUIDE :
MR.S.ANBU M.E., AMIE.,
Asst Professor
Department of Civil Engineering
Sri Sairam Engineering College
3. ABSTRACT
Our project deals with the Design of Fly over. The
location is at KALLAKURICHI, VILLUPURAM DIST
which is facing major traffic problems. We have done a
traffic survey and designed the slab deck for this Fly
over. It consists of
deck slab
longitudinal girders
Cross girders
4. METHODOLOGY
• Slab is designed by working stress method as per
the recommendation of IRC: 21-2000, Clause
304.2.1.Deck slab is designed for maximum moment due
to deck action. The T beam designed as the IRC: 21-
2000. The deck beam is designed as a cantilever on a
pier. All the elements are designed by using M20 grade
concrete and Fe415grade steel.
5. • For calculating reaction factors courbons’s method is
adopted . It is the simplest and is application when the
following conditions are satisfied.
• The ratio of span to width of deck is
greater than 2 but less than 4.
• The cross girder extends to a depth
of at least 0.75 times depth of
longitudinal girders.
• The longitudinal girders are
interconnected by at least 5
symmetrically spaced cross girders.
6. OBJECTIVE
(i) Reduced traffic also resulting in land gains which can be
utilized to enhance the pedestrian space and increase pedestrian
amenity.
(ii) Improvement and increase in size of pedestrian sidewalks
and footpaths, as well as general urban design elements to create
an environment that is conducive to pedestrian activity.
(iii) Reduced traffic congestion, conflicts, and land gains
resulting in a safer and more efficient circulation of traffic.
(iv) Reduction of traffic, which is expected to reduce the
number of accidents and potential conflicts that occur within the
area, thus saving human life as well as the economy of the region.
7. DESIGN PROCEDURE
ASSUME SECTION
Effective span of Tee-beam = 30m.
Width of carriage way = 7.5m.
Thickness of wearing coat = 80mm.
M-20 grade concrete and Fe-415 grade
HSD bars
Live load = I.R.C class AA tracked vehicle
8. CROSS SECTION OF DECK
• Four main girders are provided at 2.5m centre
• Thickness of deck slab = 250mm
• Wearing coat = 80mm.
• Kerb 600mm wide by 300mm deep are provided.
• Cross girders are provided at every 5m intervals.
9.
10. DESIGN OF INTERIOR SLAB PANELS
BENDING MOMENT
It is due to
Live load
Dead load
Live load is calculated from class AA tracked vehicle.
One wheel laced at the centre for max Bending
moment
11. Dead load is calculated by considering
Dead load of the slab
Dead load of wearing coat (80mm)
Dead load moment is calculated from class AA
tracked vehicle
12. SHEAR FORCE
For max shear , load is kept such that the whole
dispersion is in span. The load is kept at 1.51/2 = 0.755m
from the edge of the beam shown below.
13. DESIGN OF SLAB SECTION AND
REINFORCEMENT
Calculation of depth
Calculation of Ast
23. PERMISSIBLE TENDON ZONE
Five cables are arranged to follow a parabolic profile,
with the resultant force having an eccentricity of
180mm towards the soffit at the support section.
27. DESIGN OF END BLOCK
Solid end blocks are provided at the end
supports over a length of 1.5m typically equivalent
prism based on guyons method and the bursting
tension is calculated to be 336 kN
28. CONCLUSION
Design and analysis of a prestressed post tensioned
deck slab have been carried out manually. Manual design is well
enough to ensure the safety design of the bridge deck so we
designed and analyzed it manually . The bridge deck has been
designed keeping in mind the design of bridges considering the
heavy traffic potential across India and economic design of
elements of bridge . The analysis and design of prestressed
concrete structure where performed as per codal provision of
IS: 1343-1980. Our project was completed by proper designing
of structural elements satisfying the functional, economic
requirements.
29. REFERENCES
IS 1343-1980 Code of practice for pre-stressed concrete
IRC: 6Road bridges std. specification and code of practice
IRC: 18 Design criteria for Prestressed concrete road bridges
IRC: 21 Standard specification and code of practice for road
bridges
Ramamirutham S “ Design of reinforced concrete structures ”
Dhanapat Rai Publications, New Delhi, 2010
Krishna Raju N “ Prestressed concrete ” McGraw
education(India) private Limited, New Delhi