The document discusses the potential for mobile broadband in Africa and considerations for expanding mobile infrastructure on the continent. It provides an overview of the GSMA and its work promoting mobile infrastructure development. Specifically, it outlines an example collaborative initiative between mobile operators to implement economically efficient models for providing mobile broadband access to underserved areas. The initiative involves feasibility studies, regulatory adjustments, and pilot programs to identify best practices for connecting more people. It also notes that mobile operators are expected to invest $900 billion in infrastructure from 2016-2020, with Africa being a major focus, and highlights policymaker considerations around infrastructure sharing and single wholesale networks.
Towards Digital & Mobile Africa: GSMA on Infrastructure Sharing
1. Towards Digital & Mobile Africa
Mortimer Hope, Director of Africa, GSMA
Connect 2 Connect: Affordable Infrastructure Development, South Africa
19th -21st July, 2016
2. • About the GSMA
• The potential of mobile broadband in Africa
• Mobile Infrastructure
• Example of Mobile industry collaborative
initiative
• Considerations for Policymakers &
Regulators
Outline
4. Source: GSMA Intelligence (2015)
The potential of mobile broadband in Africa
Fixed telecommunications infrastructures are both underdeveloped and
expensive in most African countries
6. 6
Mobile Infrastructure development is multi-
dimensional
Airtime excise
SIM card tax
Import duties
Surcharge in Incoming
International Traffic (SIIT)
Reduced licence fees for rural
USF allocation
Subsidized energy access
Subsidized satellite backhaul
Passive sharing
Active sharing
Roaming
Access to ducts, electricity
poles, roads & railways,
public rooftops
Preferential access to
national fibre backbone
Fast-track site planning
700Mhz assignment
Spectrum Pooling
TV White Space
7. Scope & Objectives
1. build & actively support local operators’ collaborations in the
implementation of economically efficient model for the provision
of mobile broadband access to the underserved
2. identify and advocate regulatory adjustments for the
implementation of sustainable mobile broadband access
provision to the underserved
3. provide best practices to the industry globally on connecting
unconnected population
7
Example of Mobile Industry collaborative initiative
The GSMA Infrastructure Economics Programme
8. 8
IE Country Pilots Project Roadmap
DUE DILIGENCE
CONCEPTS
REVIEW
FEASIBILITY
STUDY
FIELD PILOT
DESIGN &
AGREEMENT
REGULATORY
ADJUSTMENTS &
APPROVAL
LEGAL
STRUCTURE
ROLL-OUT
MONITORING
PHASE 1
STRATEGY
PHASE 2
PILOT
PHASE 3
IMPLEMENTATION
9. CONFIDENTIAL
Figures & Forecasts
Operator CAPEX is up to USD 78bn between 2015-
20, largely driven by data growth
The mobile industry is projected to invest USD 900bn
between 2016 and 2020 into mobile infrastructure to
continue to fuel its growth, and Africa will be a big part
of this
9
Source: GSMA Intelligence (2015)
Source: gsma.com/betterfuture
10. CONFIDENTIAL
Considerations for Policymakers & Regulators
1. The GSMA supports infrastructure sharing as an industry
approach to address national/regional broadband objectives
2. There is opportunity for government to lend support to
infrastructure initiatives of operators by phasing out USFs and
discontinue collection of USF levies
3. Introduction of Single Wholesale Networks (SWN) as an
infrastructure alternative for network may lead to worse outcomes
for consumers in terms of availability and quality of service
4. Co-existence between the existing mobile networks and the SWN
is also likely to increase uncertainty which will have a dampening
effect on investment in mobile broadband services
10
11. Thank you for your attention
11
Mortimer Hope - Director Africa, GSMA
mhope@gsma.com
Editor's Notes
USF
-There is little evidence that USFs are an effective way to achieve the universal goals and may have, in fact, been counterproductive, because they tax communications customers, including in rural areas, and therefore raise the barrier to rural investment.
-USF that already exist should be targeted, time-bound and managed transparently. The funds should be allocated in a competitive and technically neutral way, in consultation with the industry.
SWNs
The evidence suggests that the design, financing and implementation of SWNs are likely to prove challenging and that there is significant risk of failure.
Infrastructure sharing
-- Site sharing increases competition by giving operators access to key sites necessary to compete on quality of service and coverage.
- Access to government-owned trunk assets should be available on non-discriminatory commercial terms, at a reasonable market rate.