The document discusses the failed merger between Daimler and Chrysler. It analyzes the root causes of the merger's failure, which included a cross-cultural mismatch between the German and American companies, a lack of integration, and high competition in the auto industry. The document then evaluates three alternatives for Daimler - maintaining the status quo, operating as a standalone company, or pursuing another alliance. It ultimately recommends that Daimler pursue a new alliance, preferably with an Asian partner, but emphasizes the need for thorough planning, cultural understanding, and a strong long-term commitment to make a new merger successful.
A presentation on the secondary study done by students of SP Jain center of management - Singapore & Dubai on the Daimler Chrysler partnership. - Jan 2008
[PDF] Press release: President Obama at Daimler: US President visits production plant of US vehicle subsidiary Daimler Trucks North America in North Carolina
[http://www.lifepr.de?boxid=294640]
Assessing the extent of synergy which is centralized on HR prescription and HR bundles reality in this assignment shall be outlined in the Daimler AG, an organization registered under DAX companies in Germany. Daimler is one of the most accredited manufacturers of luxury and heavy commercial vehicles and accessories in the world. According to Beverly (1986) the operation of this multimillion organization commenced in the early 1880s, Daimler Benz was founded by two German locomotives engineers Gottlieb Daimler and Carl Benz, and they were intrigued in making internal combustion engine and later perfected to making fuel driven vehicles. This organization ownership is a publicly traded corporation and employs globally around 280,000 employees. This organization has been rated by the Global fortune to be the number 23 of the wealthiest organization in the world. This is with the credential of having a net income of US$2 billion and an accumulative of total revenue of US$140 billion as echoed by Mattera (2000).
A presentation on the secondary study done by students of SP Jain center of management - Singapore & Dubai on the Daimler Chrysler partnership. - Jan 2008
[PDF] Press release: President Obama at Daimler: US President visits production plant of US vehicle subsidiary Daimler Trucks North America in North Carolina
[http://www.lifepr.de?boxid=294640]
Assessing the extent of synergy which is centralized on HR prescription and HR bundles reality in this assignment shall be outlined in the Daimler AG, an organization registered under DAX companies in Germany. Daimler is one of the most accredited manufacturers of luxury and heavy commercial vehicles and accessories in the world. According to Beverly (1986) the operation of this multimillion organization commenced in the early 1880s, Daimler Benz was founded by two German locomotives engineers Gottlieb Daimler and Carl Benz, and they were intrigued in making internal combustion engine and later perfected to making fuel driven vehicles. This organization ownership is a publicly traded corporation and employs globally around 280,000 employees. This organization has been rated by the Global fortune to be the number 23 of the wealthiest organization in the world. This is with the credential of having a net income of US$2 billion and an accumulative of total revenue of US$140 billion as echoed by Mattera (2000).
Join Dan as he explores trends in Industry 4.0 such as cyber-physical systems, explains the common mental models most large enterprises use when developing their innovation programs and how they evaluate innovation partners. He will then delve into several real world examples of how the digitization of industrial processes gets messy when the real world gets involved. Despite the challenges posed by typhoons, Ebola, magnetic fields that fry electronics and extending wireless networks kilometers underground, there is immense opportunity for those brave enough to pursue it.
Job search marketing today isn't like your father's job search. If you understand that 80% of the available jobs are NEVER advertised, you'll understand why so many people are having such a hard time finding job opportunities. Yes, they are scarcer than before but they are there. Job search is now a full blow marketing campaign that includes your ability to conduct a personal marketing and branding campaign.
www.jobsearchmarketing.net for my free blog on job search.
Email: dirksmarketing@gmail.com
Think Big, Start Small, Move Fast: Digital Strategy in a Changing WorldMichael Edson
Keynote for MMEx digital strategy symposium, Randers, Denmark, August 2015. This presentation discusses the shortcomings of traditional strategy processes and suggests alternatives that emphasize speed, iteration, and a bias for action.
Design Facilitator has collected over 30,000 responses from clients of Architecture, Engineering and other professional service firms. They've analyzed these responses and their research has identified the most damaging misconceptions firms believe about their clients' perceptions.
* Misconception #1: Clients think our fees are too high
* Misconception #2: Clients will tell me if they have a problem
* Misconception #3: I know exactly how to help my clients best
* Misconception #4: Clients are just looking for the cheapest option
In this presentation, we'll show you how these misconceptions negatively affect your Architecture or Engineering firm and your clients. We'll provide strategies to overcome these problems, create stronger client relationships through more successful project outcomes and increase your firm's profitability.
Warren Buffett says his guiding principle is to “be fearful when others are greedy and greedy when others are fearful.” There’s certainly plenty of fear out there, and thus plenty of opportunities to get greedy. Greed, however, does not necessarily translate into wealth.
In “Beyond Fear and Greed: Capitalizing on Opportunities in the Current Crisis,” we draw on our two years of research into more than 2,500 major corporate failures and our related consulting work to describe the landmines that companies are mostly like to hit as they try to capitalize on the turmoil that has roiled many markets since the summer of 2008. We also lay out a process for stress testing new business strategies, ensuring that greed does not send you down the wrong path and increasing the chances that you’ll pick a highly prosperous road.
Taking ideas and slides from the Firefighter presentation, I designed a Contractor Safety Presentation which was attended before season start up. The goal was to not only refresh the employees but concentrate on issues which Lafarge has identified as critical hazards they might face while working for Lafarge.
A presentation I had to give on the consequences of bad business practices in ethics. I specifically cited Enron and WorldCom as my examples. The .ppt contains many hyperlinks to videos supporting my case.
A presentation that was designed for a group of firefighters, to help align the common safety hazards that face them both. While I worked for Lafarge I created this to help promote synergies between the two organizations and foster common learnings. The presentation was visually based to induce conversation and is nothing without its speaker.
Discover the innovative and creative projects that highlight my journey throu...dylandmeas
Discover the innovative and creative projects that highlight my journey through Full Sail University. Below, you’ll find a collection of my work showcasing my skills and expertise in digital marketing, event planning, and media production.
Taurus Zodiac Sign_ Personality Traits and Sign Dates.pptxmy Pandit
Explore the world of the Taurus zodiac sign. Learn about their stability, determination, and appreciation for beauty. Discover how Taureans' grounded nature and hardworking mindset define their unique personality.
Cracking the Workplace Discipline Code Main.pptxWorkforce Group
Cultivating and maintaining discipline within teams is a critical differentiator for successful organisations.
Forward-thinking leaders and business managers understand the impact that discipline has on organisational success. A disciplined workforce operates with clarity, focus, and a shared understanding of expectations, ultimately driving better results, optimising productivity, and facilitating seamless collaboration.
Although discipline is not a one-size-fits-all approach, it can help create a work environment that encourages personal growth and accountability rather than solely relying on punitive measures.
In this deck, you will learn the significance of workplace discipline for organisational success. You’ll also learn
• Four (4) workplace discipline methods you should consider
• The best and most practical approach to implementing workplace discipline.
• Three (3) key tips to maintain a disciplined workplace.
Accpac to QuickBooks Conversion Navigating the Transition with Online Account...PaulBryant58
This article provides a comprehensive guide on how to
effectively manage the convert Accpac to QuickBooks , with a particular focus on utilizing online accounting services to streamline the process.
As a business owner in Delaware, staying on top of your tax obligations is paramount, especially with the annual deadline for Delaware Franchise Tax looming on March 1. One such obligation is the annual Delaware Franchise Tax, which serves as a crucial requirement for maintaining your company’s legal standing within the state. While the prospect of handling tax matters may seem daunting, rest assured that the process can be straightforward with the right guidance. In this comprehensive guide, we’ll walk you through the steps of filing your Delaware Franchise Tax and provide insights to help you navigate the process effectively.
Unveiling the Secrets How Does Generative AI Work.pdfSam H
At its core, generative artificial intelligence relies on the concept of generative models, which serve as engines that churn out entirely new data resembling their training data. It is like a sculptor who has studied so many forms found in nature and then uses this knowledge to create sculptures from his imagination that have never been seen before anywhere else. If taken to cyberspace, gans work almost the same way.
Personal Brand Statement:
As an Army veteran dedicated to lifelong learning, I bring a disciplined, strategic mindset to my pursuits. I am constantly expanding my knowledge to innovate and lead effectively. My journey is driven by a commitment to excellence, and to make a meaningful impact in the world.
3.0 Project 2_ Developing My Brand Identity Kit.pptxtanyjahb
A personal brand exploration presentation summarizes an individual's unique qualities and goals, covering strengths, values, passions, and target audience. It helps individuals understand what makes them stand out, their desired image, and how they aim to achieve it.
Remote sensing and monitoring are changing the mining industry for the better. These are providing innovative solutions to long-standing challenges. Those related to exploration, extraction, and overall environmental management by mining technology companies Odisha. These technologies make use of satellite imaging, aerial photography and sensors to collect data that might be inaccessible or from hazardous locations. With the use of this technology, mining operations are becoming increasingly efficient. Let us gain more insight into the key aspects associated with remote sensing and monitoring when it comes to mining.
Improving profitability for small businessBen Wann
In this comprehensive presentation, we will explore strategies and practical tips for enhancing profitability in small businesses. Tailored to meet the unique challenges faced by small enterprises, this session covers various aspects that directly impact the bottom line. Attendees will learn how to optimize operational efficiency, manage expenses, and increase revenue through innovative marketing and customer engagement techniques.
Falcon stands out as a top-tier P2P Invoice Discounting platform in India, bridging esteemed blue-chip companies and eager investors. Our goal is to transform the investment landscape in India by establishing a comprehensive destination for borrowers and investors with diverse profiles and needs, all while minimizing risk. What sets Falcon apart is the elimination of intermediaries such as commercial banks and depository institutions, allowing investors to enjoy higher yields.
Premium MEAN Stack Development Solutions for Modern BusinessesSynapseIndia
Stay ahead of the curve with our premium MEAN Stack Development Solutions. Our expert developers utilize MongoDB, Express.js, AngularJS, and Node.js to create modern and responsive web applications. Trust us for cutting-edge solutions that drive your business growth and success.
Know more: https://www.synapseindia.com/technology/mean-stack-development-company.html
3. “Today you can eliminate that hyphen because we are taking steps to make DiamlerChrysler truly one company everywhere in the world: no hyphens, no spaces.” Dieter Zetsche CEO of DiamlerChrysler, January 25, 2006 “Cerberus Takes Over Majority Interest in Chrysler Group and Related Financial Services Business for EUR 5.5 Billion ($74 Million) from DiamlerChrysler.” www.diamlerchrysler.com May 14, 2007 M.A. + L.O.C.K. Consulting
11. “Today you can eliminate that hyphen because we are taking steps to make DaimlerChrysler truly one company everywhere in the world: no hyphens, no spaces.” Dieter Zetsche CEO of DaimlerChrysler, January 25, 2006 “Cerberus Takes Over Majority Interest in Chrysler Group and Related Financial Services Business for EUR 5.5 Billion ($7.4 Billion) from DaimlerChrysler.” www.daimlerchrysler.com May 14, 2007 M.A. + L.O.C.K. Consulting
17. What Happened? Cross Cultural Mismatch High Rivalry & Competition Lack of Integration Merger’s Failure Root Causes ? ? Loss of Perceived Value Industry Demand ? M.A. + L.O.C.K. Consulting
Why we are here, but before we can solve the issues we need to look at the causes.Problem (Issue Statement):The “merger of equals” between Daimler AG and Chrysler has failed because of a lack of cultural synergy. Daimler wants to move forward and perhaps form an alliance with a different company. Before it does so, it faces several problems, namely: a stalled Asian strategy, a need for corporate restructuring, a deteriorating brand image, and excessively high manufacturing costs. Before considering any new alliances, Daimler also needs to analyze why they failed to realize the synergies they had hoped for from the merger with Chrysler.
Data Analysis: Instead of being a merger of equals, this merger was a disaster for both Daimler and Chrysler, and resulted in a significant loss of profits. The causes of the failure of the merger are shown in the fishbone diagram in Figure 1 and discussed below.
Data Analysis: Instead of being a merger of equals, this merger was a disaster for both Daimler and Chrysler, and resulted in a significant loss of profits. The causes of the failure of the merger are shown in the fishbone diagram in Figure 1 and discussed below.
Prt1The first cause for the failure of the merger was the cross-cultural incompatibility between the two companies. The management styles differ largely between Daimler and Chrysler. Daimler is committed to a tradition of methodical decision making, and places much emphasis on superior engineering and high product quality. Their management structure is also more hierarchical and decision making is more centralized. Chrysler, on the other hand, is used to a more creative, decentralized decision making process. As such, the hierarchy of the company is less rigid. The focus is on cost-controlled production. This cultural mismatch was exacerbated by lack of exposure to each others’ management practices, the displacement of North American executives, and the lack of parity as regards salaries and compensation. This caused a large amount of tension between employees of the two companies.
Prt2The first cause for the failure of the merger was the cross-cultural incompatibility between the two companies. The management styles differ largely between Daimler and Chrysler. Daimler is committed to a tradition of methodical decision making, and places much emphasis on superior engineering and high product quality. Their management structure is also more hierarchical and decision making is more centralized. Chrysler, on the other hand, is used to a more creative, decentralized decision making process. As such, the hierarchy of the company is less rigid. The focus is on cost-controlled production. This cultural mismatch was exacerbated by lack of exposure to each others’ management practices, the displacement of North American executives, and the lack of parity as regards salaries and compensation. This caused a large amount of tension between employees of the two companies.
Another major cause was the lack of integration of manufacturing practices due in part to brand incompatibility. Daimler’s brand was perceived to be fancier and more elite, while Chrysler’s was considered to be inferior. Daimler dealers in Europe even refused to sell Chrysler cars. Employees on both sides refused to buy in. as such, there was no serious attempt made to integrate manufacturing processes to produce the reduction in costs that Daimler was looking for. Indeed, the culture clash seemed to be as much between the products as between the employees of the two companies. Due to the lack of integration, Daimler ended up with all of the disadvantages of the merger with none of the advantages.
High rivalry in the automotive industry was also a factor. Tariff barriers tend to be high. Introduction of new products is usually an expensive and time consuming process. As such, competition in the industry has become increasingly cut-throat over the past few years.
The market has also grown smaller and consumer demand is low. Due to the economic slowdown since the events of September 11, increased unemployment rates, and rising fuel prices, consumers do not buy as many cars as they used to. Their confidence has also decreased as relates to Chrysler specifically.
Lastly, the merger unfortunately resulted in a loss of value to both companies. Stock prices fell so low that investors initiated a lawsuit. Quality issues cost the post-merger company as well; 1.3 million Mercedes cars were recalled in 2005. This loss of value worsened as the merger began to fall apart in a positive feedback loop.
Figure 2 represents an importance and urgency matrix showing how we see the problems being faced by the company.
Constraints and Opportunities: The company must overcome several main constraints before it can pursue any of these opportunities. Manufacturing costs are high. The current management structure is expensive and somewhat inflexible. Daimler’s brand image and reputation within the market has suffered in part due to the failed merger, so the company needs to go back to its core values and work from its core competencies.
Constraints and Opportunities: With the automotive industry in its current state, it is vital for Daimler to establish a stable place for itself within the market and recover from the merger. The company has several major opportunities it can pursue to establish more market share. There is room for lowering costs and optimizing supply chains. Daimler can examine entering emerging markets, such as new entrants to the European Union. It can revitalize its stalled Asian entry strategy. The company can also re-establish its technological leadership and increase research and development. One possible future course for the company is production of hybrid/eco-friendly vehicles.
Key Decision FactorsIn view of the constraints listed above, the key decision factors that will be used to evaluate Daimler’s alternatives are: corporate and brand image, margins and profits, cultural sensitivity, market share, growth rate, and operations and production efficiency. Satisfying these criteria ensures firstly that the chosen alternative is viable, and secondly that Daimler is able to overcome its problems and pursue the opportunities noted above
Alternatives: In light of the situation, Daimler can pursue one of three different alternatives. Alternative #1 consists of a status quo situation. Daimler can continue with business as usual, recoup its losses from the failed merger, and wait for market conditions to get better. This is the safest alternative and may allow the companies to strengthen its core values. However, considering how competitive the automotive industry is, this may cost Daimler market share in the not-too-distant future. It also precludes following many of the opportunities listed above.
Alternatives: In light of the situation, Daimler can pursue one of three different alternatives. Alternative #1 consists of a status quo situation. Daimler can continue with business as usual, recoup its losses from the failed merger, and wait for market conditions to get better. This is the safest alternative and may allow the companies to strengthen its core values. However, considering how competitive the automotive industry is, this may cost Daimler market share in the not-too-distant future. It also precludes following many of the opportunities listed above.
Alternatives: In light of the situation, Daimler can pursue one of three different alternatives. Alternative #1 consists of a status quo situation. Daimler can continue with business as usual, recoup its losses from the failed merger, and wait for market conditions to get better. This is the safest alternative and may allow the companies to strengthen its core values. However, considering how competitive the automotive industry is, this may cost Daimler market share in the not-too-distant future. It also precludes following many of the opportunities listed above.
Alternatives: In light of the situation, Daimler can pursue one of three different alternatives. Alternative #1 consists of a status quo situation. Daimler can continue with business as usual, recoup its losses from the failed merger, and wait for market conditions to get better. This is the safest alternative and may allow the companies to strengthen its core values. However, considering how competitive the automotive industry is, this may cost Daimler market share in the not-too-distant future. It also precludes following many of the opportunities listed above.
Alternatives:Alternative #2 involves Daimler remaining a single, stand-alone company. No new mergers or alliances should be pursued. Daimler should try to fill in the gaps and find ways to cut costs and streamline manufacturing processes. In terms of growth and expansion, this alternative may eventually lead to a greenfield in North American operating under the Daimler name. This alternative may allow the company to overcome some of its constraints, and also provides an option for expansion into North America. It may not be enough to get Daimler the larger market share it aspires to.
Alternatives:Alternative #2 involves Daimler remaining a single, stand-alone company. No new mergers or alliances should be pursued. Daimler should try to fill in the gaps and find ways to cut costs and streamline manufacturing processes. In terms of growth and expansion, this alternative may eventually lead to a greenfield in North American operating under the Daimler name. This alternative may allow the company to overcome some of its constraints, and also provides an option for expansion into North America. It may not be enough to get Daimler the larger market share it aspires to.
Alternatives:Alternative #2 involves Daimler remaining a single, stand-alone company. No new mergers or alliances should be pursued. Daimler should try to fill in the gaps and find ways to cut costs and streamline manufacturing processes. In terms of growth and expansion, this alternative may eventually lead to a greenfield in North American operating under the Daimler name. This alternative may allow the company to overcome some of its constraints, and also provides an option for expansion into North America. It may not be enough to get Daimler the larger market share it aspires to.
Alternatives:Alternative #2 involves Daimler remaining a single, stand-alone company. No new mergers or alliances should be pursued. Daimler should try to fill in the gaps and find ways to cut costs and streamline manufacturing processes. In terms of growth and expansion, this alternative may eventually lead to a greenfield in North American operating under the Daimler name. This alternative may allow the company to overcome some of its constraints, and also provides an option for expansion into North America. It may not be enough to get Daimler the larger market share it aspires to.
Alternatives: Alternative #3 involves Daimler pursuing another alliance with a more suitable company. A full merger is not advisable; Daimler employees have previously rejected this option and this was a significant factor in the failure of the merger with Chrysler. A less integrative alliance of a less involved level is indicated to minimize risk and culture clash. This would be done with the view of streamlining manufacturing processes and decreasing costs, as well as combining new research and development initiatives. New market opportunities can thus be pursued jointly.
Alternatives: Alternative #3 involves Daimler pursuing another alliance with a more suitable company. A full merger is not advisable; Daimler employees have previously rejected this option and this was a significant factor in the failure of the merger with Chrysler. A less integrative alliance of a less involved level is indicated to minimize risk and culture clash. This would be done with the view of streamlining manufacturing processes and decreasing costs, as well as combining new research and development initiatives. New market opportunities can thus be pursued jointly.
Alternatives: Alternative #3 involves Daimler pursuing another alliance with a more suitable company. A full merger is not advisable; Daimler employees have previously rejected this option and this was a significant factor in the failure of the merger with Chrysler. A less integrative alliance of a less involved level is indicated to minimize risk and culture clash. This would be done with the view of streamlining manufacturing processes and decreasing costs, as well as combining new research and development initiatives. New market opportunities can thus be pursued jointly.
Alternatives: Alternative #3 involves Daimler pursuing another alliance with a more suitable company. A full merger is not advisable; Daimler employees have previously rejected this option and this was a significant factor in the failure of the merger with Chrysler. A less integrative alliance of a less involved level is indicated to minimize risk and culture clash. This would be done with the view of streamlining manufacturing processes and decreasing costs, as well as combining new research and development initiatives. New market opportunities can thus be pursued jointly.
Alternatives:Alternative #3 continuedAn alliance with an Asian company is preferable over an alliance with a European company. A European alliance would certainly be the safer option due to fewer barriers, similar business and corporate cultures, similarity in world views, and common distribution networks. An Asian alliance, while riskier, also provides a much more significant opportunity. A European alliance would result in less global market coverage. There would be more opportunity for cost savings as Asian companies are known for producing a high quality product at a competitive price. In addition, some Asian automotive manufacturers are already moving into the new hybrid technologies, which is an opportunity Daimler must pursue to remain competitive. The Asian and German business cultures are not far removed either; both are methodical decision makers, high context cultures, and have more hierarchical management structures. Daimler may thus be more compatible with an Asian company than it was with Chrysler.
Reommendations:Qualitative Orange & Quantitative BlueIn terms of corporate and brand image, the suggested alliance may have a positive or negative effect, depending on how successful the manoeuvre is. Brand image can improve greatly if the alliance is successful and product quality increases. It can also suffer if the alliance does badly. However, it is worth noting that there is less risk to Daimler’s brand image in this instance, given that the proposed move is an alliance not a merger. This should insulate buyers’ perception of the brand somewhat.Cultural sensitivity in this instance is only useful in judging the third alternative. As was previously discussed, a merger with an Asian company has a far greater chance of success than a merger with a North American company. This is due to the greater similarities in corporate cultures and management styles between the two regions. There is greater organizational formality and structures are more hierarchical. Both management styles value methodical decision making. Both have long term planning mentalities with a focus on future growth.Daimler’s market share is likely to grow significantly if it chooses this option. Such an alliance would open up markets in Asia and perhaps other markets, if the target company has a presence elsewhere. This is the ideal alternative if Daimler is to revitalize its Asian entry strategy. It also provides a platform for future growth and expansion as other markets can be entered jointly.As for margins and profits, an alliance with an Asian company can greatly increase these quantitative measures. This would come mainly from increased cost savings, synergies in manufacturing and R & D platforms, and more sales.Finally, by choosing the right company, Daimler can streamline its R & D and manufacturing costs, as well as take advantage of economies of scale to a certain extent. It may also be able to take advantage of its new partner’s existing distribution channels. This will go a long way towards solving a problem the company has long been plagued with.
Alternatives:After serious consideration and despite the requirements on time and cost, we recommend that Daimler implement alternative #3. Based on the above matrix, alternative #3 is the strongest option. As has been mentioned, it is the riskiest option that the company can implement, but it still has a high probability of return.
Recommendations:Which Car Company To Chose
Action and Implementation Plan: Daimler should begin by doing a careful environmental assessment to decide where the greater opportunity lies. An analysis of the companies in the chosen area should then follow. Details which must be carefully considered include, but are not limited to, the following: market share, strength in R & D, manufacturing synergies, management culture synergies, compatible supplier networks, and compatible long term goals. These are the advantages Daimler would like to enjoy through this alliance.Once the assessment is complete, the sample should be narrowed down to three companies. At this point, it is vital to research the cultural profiles of the countries these companies operate within, to ensure that a cultural synergy exists. Even more important at this point is to foster employee cooperation. The two main reasons the Chrysler merger failed was the lack of cultural sensitivity on both companies’ parts, and the lack of employee buy-in. the preparation work needs to be done more carefully this time and a more effective cultural sensitivity training process should be conducted. Preliminary talks can then begin. The process up to this point should not take longer than six months.
Action and Implementation Plan: It is important to note here that relationship building with the target company needs to be the focus of the company if an alliance is to be built successfully. Therefore, a great investment in terms of time should be anticipated, and the negotiation team assigned to the project should be capable, experienced, and committed. A more fixed timeline can be developed after preliminary talks are completed, but we estimate 1.5 – 2 years in total.
Contingency Plan: If preliminary talks fail, or no suitable Asian target is found, we recommend our second alternative as a contingency plan. This will allow Daimler to re-focus on its core values and competencies, cut costs, and retrench. It also offers a safer alternative for slower growth. However, the company should be prepared to move more aggressively than it has in the past if it is to maintain market it share and continue to be profitable; this is dictated by the state of the industry and the general economy.
Assumptions:Several assumptions were made throughout the analysis of the case and design and analysis of alternatives. The first is that the result of all alternatives is the best case scenario for each case. We assume that Daimler will carefully consider the previous merger and learn from its mistakes, and use the failure as a learning experience; also that Daimler employees will be cooperative and work toward the alliance in concert with their top management. We assume that sharing of resources with the target Asian company will lead to lowered costs. Lastly and most importantly, we assume the cooperation of the target company and their willingness to indulge at least preliminary talks.
