W4A 2010 Education Tool to Support the Educational Process Chris Bailey
•Download as PPT, PDF•
0 likes•365 views
The document describes an educational tool called the Accessibility Evaluation Assistant (AEA) which aims to guide novice auditors through an accessibility evaluation process. The AEA lists accessibility checks based on the evaluation context, such as the user group and site features being evaluated. It provides instructions on how to perform each check and allows auditors to record results. Future work involves further developing the tool and testing its effectiveness at improving the consistency of evaluation results compared to existing methods.
Report
Share
Report
Share
![Christopher Bailey Dr. Elaine Pearson Teesside University [email_address] An Educational Tool to Support the Accessibility Evaluation Process](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/cuserschrisdesktopw4a2010cbailey-100426131100-phpapp01/85/W4A-2010-Education-Tool-to-Support-the-Educational-Process-Chris-Bailey-1-320.jpg)
![Main Issues ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]]()
Recommended
Usability Evaluation in Educational Technology
The document discusses different methods for evaluating the usability of educational technology. It defines usability as measuring the effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction of users completing tasks with a tool. There are three main methods: user-based involves testing users on tasks; expert-based uses experts to examine interfaces; and model-based applies models to predict usability based on task sequences. Each method has advantages like user-based providing realistic estimates, and disadvantages like expert-based being affected by expert variability. Choosing a method depends on needed information and the development stage being evaluated.
Evaluation of eLearning
This document discusses methods for evaluating eLearning programs, including formative evaluation during development and summative evaluation after completion. It describes Kirkpatrick's model of evaluation, including levels measuring reaction, learning, behavior change, and results/ROI. Formative methods covered include expert reviews of interfaces and content, and user reviews through observations and testing. Summative usability testing methods are also outlined, such as heuristic evaluation involving experts and user testing involving representative tasks. The document recommends involving multiple evaluators and 5 users to reliably find a high percentage of usability problems.
Accessibility, Usability and User Centred Design (Accessibility workshop)
The document outlines an accessibility testing workshop which involves groups assessing the accessibility of websites. Participants are asked to choose a social networking, e-government, or e-learning website to evaluate. Their report should describe the site, assessment strategy, results, and recommendations. The assessment should consider both automated checks of accessibility standards, and manual checks of code and usability through testing. Resources provided include guidelines, validation and evaluation tools, and assistive technologies to facilitate the assessment.
Resume testing
Neha KM is a software tester with 1 year of experience in manual testing, writing test cases, executing tests, and defect tracking using Bugzilla. She has expertise in black box testing, functional testing, system testing, regression testing, and has experience testing both desktop and web applications. She is looking for a challenging project to further develop her technical and functional skills.
Exam view 250111
The document discusses a project to integrate student exam results from a student records system into an institution's virtual learning environment. It aimed to address inconsistent presentation of exam results, reduce duplication of effort, and improve privacy. The design developed object-oriented data models and gathered positive student feedback on a wireframe. The development team queried the student records database directly and created a backend to support other database systems. The application allows flexible, 24/7 online access to live exam results through a single sign-on. Future enhancements could include promoting timely input of results, a request feature for students, and inclusion of staff comments.
Summary of Two Evaluation Studies
Presents a summery of two evaluation studies in the field of educational technology. In the first stude the focus is upon the purpose and methodology, however in the seconed the concern is more about the technological features that have been evaluated
Blog - Affordances Analysis Table - updated
Blogs can be used for both individual authoring and collaboration. As a learning tool, blogs allow:
1) Health professionals to embed multimedia like images and videos to demonstrate best practices and techniques to support written content for colleagues or community members.
2) Authors to narrate their treatment approaches for de-identified patients over time, enhancing constructivist learning for both the author and followers.
3) Various privacy and design options to suit different audiences and levels of engagement from small learning communities to larger public spaces.
The Development and Usability Evaluation of a Standards-Based Grading Tool fo...
The document summarizes a study that developed and evaluated a standards-based grading tool called RealGrade for faculty at Sultan Qaboos University in Oman. The tool aimed to streamline grading practices and facilitate standards-based assessment. Researchers conducted interviews and focus groups to determine faculty needs, then developed RealGrade to automate grading, enable qualitative assessment, and generate reports. 116 faculty tested the tool and completed a questionnaire finding RealGrade effective, efficient, and satisfactory overall, with more computer-experienced and less experienced instructors viewing it most positively. Interviews provided additional insights. Researchers concluded RealGrade supports standards-based assessment but report cards need improvement and more research is needed to address instructor differences.
Recommended
Usability Evaluation in Educational Technology
The document discusses different methods for evaluating the usability of educational technology. It defines usability as measuring the effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction of users completing tasks with a tool. There are three main methods: user-based involves testing users on tasks; expert-based uses experts to examine interfaces; and model-based applies models to predict usability based on task sequences. Each method has advantages like user-based providing realistic estimates, and disadvantages like expert-based being affected by expert variability. Choosing a method depends on needed information and the development stage being evaluated.
Evaluation of eLearning
This document discusses methods for evaluating eLearning programs, including formative evaluation during development and summative evaluation after completion. It describes Kirkpatrick's model of evaluation, including levels measuring reaction, learning, behavior change, and results/ROI. Formative methods covered include expert reviews of interfaces and content, and user reviews through observations and testing. Summative usability testing methods are also outlined, such as heuristic evaluation involving experts and user testing involving representative tasks. The document recommends involving multiple evaluators and 5 users to reliably find a high percentage of usability problems.
Accessibility, Usability and User Centred Design (Accessibility workshop)
The document outlines an accessibility testing workshop which involves groups assessing the accessibility of websites. Participants are asked to choose a social networking, e-government, or e-learning website to evaluate. Their report should describe the site, assessment strategy, results, and recommendations. The assessment should consider both automated checks of accessibility standards, and manual checks of code and usability through testing. Resources provided include guidelines, validation and evaluation tools, and assistive technologies to facilitate the assessment.
Resume testing
Neha KM is a software tester with 1 year of experience in manual testing, writing test cases, executing tests, and defect tracking using Bugzilla. She has expertise in black box testing, functional testing, system testing, regression testing, and has experience testing both desktop and web applications. She is looking for a challenging project to further develop her technical and functional skills.
Exam view 250111
The document discusses a project to integrate student exam results from a student records system into an institution's virtual learning environment. It aimed to address inconsistent presentation of exam results, reduce duplication of effort, and improve privacy. The design developed object-oriented data models and gathered positive student feedback on a wireframe. The development team queried the student records database directly and created a backend to support other database systems. The application allows flexible, 24/7 online access to live exam results through a single sign-on. Future enhancements could include promoting timely input of results, a request feature for students, and inclusion of staff comments.
Summary of Two Evaluation Studies
Presents a summery of two evaluation studies in the field of educational technology. In the first stude the focus is upon the purpose and methodology, however in the seconed the concern is more about the technological features that have been evaluated
Blog - Affordances Analysis Table - updated
Blogs can be used for both individual authoring and collaboration. As a learning tool, blogs allow:
1) Health professionals to embed multimedia like images and videos to demonstrate best practices and techniques to support written content for colleagues or community members.
2) Authors to narrate their treatment approaches for de-identified patients over time, enhancing constructivist learning for both the author and followers.
3) Various privacy and design options to suit different audiences and levels of engagement from small learning communities to larger public spaces.
The Development and Usability Evaluation of a Standards-Based Grading Tool fo...
The document summarizes a study that developed and evaluated a standards-based grading tool called RealGrade for faculty at Sultan Qaboos University in Oman. The tool aimed to streamline grading practices and facilitate standards-based assessment. Researchers conducted interviews and focus groups to determine faculty needs, then developed RealGrade to automate grading, enable qualitative assessment, and generate reports. 116 faculty tested the tool and completed a questionnaire finding RealGrade effective, efficient, and satisfactory overall, with more computer-experienced and less experienced instructors viewing it most positively. Interviews provided additional insights. Researchers concluded RealGrade supports standards-based assessment but report cards need improvement and more research is needed to address instructor differences.
Evaluating Content Management Systems in Academic Libraries
This document summarizes a study that evaluated content management systems (CMS) used in academic libraries. A survey of library staff found that CMS generally made web development easier but satisfaction varied by system. While CMS simplified content management, institutionally mandated templates sometimes limited customization. Templates prioritized institutional branding over library usability. The benefits of CMS were ease of use and content control, but limitations included lacking features and templates not considering library needs.
Synsoft global online examination system
Synsoft Global offers an online examination system software that allows organizations to administer exams online. The software allows organizations to create exams across different topics and difficulty levels, manage user profiles and test settings, display timers for timed exams, and provide results to organizational administrators for evaluation. The online examination system is a cost-effective option for educational institutions, companies conducting recruitments, and those requiring employee assessments.
QV Automated Testing Overview
The document provides an overview of developments in automated testing and computerized test evaluation systems. It discusses 10 key areas: 1) background and evolution of automated testing, 2) planning valid tests, 3) developing tests, 4) various item formats, 5) administering tests, 6) scoring and reporting, 7) psychometric analysis, 8) communications, 9) security concerns, and 10) ensuring accessibility. The final comments note continuing evolution in areas like bandwidth, delivery methods, item formats, administration features, and adherence to proper development processes.
MIS 49100 Week 2 Systems Development Life Cycle
The document discusses the six phases of the Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC) methodology for project development: 1) Preliminary Investigation assesses feasibility, 2) System Analysis studies requirements, 3) System Design plans alternatives, 4) System Development builds the system, 5) System Implementation installs and trains users on the new system, and 6) System Operation and Maintenance provides ongoing support. Each phase is described in detail, outlining key activities, tools used, and documentation produced.
Blog - Affordances Analysis
Blogs can be used by health professionals to chronicle treatment approaches for de-identified patients, enhancing constructivist learning for both the author and followers. Features like embedding images and video can support educational text. Tags and links help users find relevant health information. Blogs allow for single or multi-author setups, personalization of design, and inclusion of multimedia. Their accessibility across devices and platforms supports interaction at both workplace and community levels.
Standards Based Approach to User Interface Development
Standards Based Approach to User Interface Development presentation at ACM SIGCHI conference Bangalore
Creative Content and Quality Testing in Mobile Applications -Suzanne Marie Fr...
Creative Content and Quality Testing in Mobile Applications -Suzanne Marie Fr...TAUS - The Language Data Network
In this session, the challenges of localizing and evaluating creative content will be discussed. There is a pressing need to ensure quality even for marketing, game, hospitality, multimedia and mobile content just to name a few. One of the aims of the session is to define what’s relevant to QE for content that might have a short life cycle or low visibility within the product versus aspects of user experience that might be more critical. Speakers will discuss the role of traditional linguistic and functional quality testing versus new approaches that focus on areas that users might consider more important. How to balance quality - as we currently define it - with real expectations set by users, keeping in mind that user expectations might touch a variety of product areas and not include linguistic quality at all?
Session leader: Margarita Núñez-González (Simultrans)
Panelists: Suzanne Marie Frank (Vistatec), Orly González Kahn (Google)State of the art on the cognitive walkthrough method by MAHATODY, SAGAR and ...
This document reviews the evolution and variants of the Cognitive Walkthrough (CW) usability inspection method. It discusses the original 3 versions of CW proposed by its creators, as well as 11 significant extensions and variants developed by other researchers to address limitations. The extensions include variants for specific contexts like the web, groupware systems, and distributed teams. The document concludes with 4 summaries on conceptual aspects, comparative studies, non-comparative studies, and guidance on choosing a CW variant.
Finalversionasofapr30
The document discusses using Qualtrics to streamline the student application process for a nurse extern program. It describes the previous challenges with managing applications through email and manual data entry. Implementing an online Qualtrics survey provided an easy user-friendly form for both students and faculty. It allowed the program to efficiently track applicants, confirm submissions, and weed out ineligible candidates. The Qualtrics system provided collaborative access and the ability to easily find information. Lessons from the first year were discussed, such as combining essays and providing file upload options to further improve the application process.
Leveraging Academic Analytics in System Administration, Professional Developm...
Identifying, collecting, reporting, and using system activity data from Blackboard is often a challenge. Come to this session to learn about a series of free Building Blocks that are available (such as bbStats and Project ASTRO) that enable you to collect, generate, and leverage reports of faculty and student activity in Blackboard.
Consumer Health Website
A student project proposal for a conceptual consumer health website. Masters of Health Informatics, University of Toronto.
User Experience and Accessibility
This document summarizes a study that analyzed the user experience and accessibility of county web portals. It applied usability heuristics and accessibility standards to evaluate 39 Alabama county portals. The study found that 58% of counties had adopted web portals, but portals only met an average of 10-11 out of 14 usability criteria. Only 10.8% of portals had no coding errors, and 15.8% supported new technologies like mobile. The study recommends portals go beyond standards to improve usability for all users and better support mobile devices.
The reviewerrole
Reviewers receive email notifications when students submit work for review. Reviewers provide feedback by adding comments to submitted assignments rather than filling out formal evaluations. Reviewers can access submitted work from the reviewer tab and see if new feedback has been requested or added. They can filter the work by student, title, and type. Comments are entered line by line for lessons and units, while individual comments are added for each requirement in DRF programs. Additional information about programs and students can be found in program links.
Web application testing
Web application automated testing or rather automated website testing involves usage of various types of software automation testing tools to evaluate the performance of a website.
https://www.testingxperts.com/blog/web-application-automated-testing
ASK THE USERS: EXPECTATIONS, BEHAVIORS AND SATISFACTION OF ONLINE ARCHIVE...
presentation at "Archives Online. It's all about choices" EABH Workshop, 28 Apr 2016, Vienna, Austria
Open Sample Intro Pgraham 0910
OpenSample is an industry initiative to improve the quality of online surveys through sharing information about respondents' survey participation histories across survey companies. The initiative aims to create an independent database tracked by a trusted third party to consolidate anonymous metadata on surveys taken. This would allow survey companies to query the database to obtain information about their respondents' participation in other panels. Several working groups are formed to handle technical, legal, research and outreach aspects to make the initiative operational by January 2009. Participation in contributing data and using the results is voluntary.
U Learn Learning Management System
U learn LMS is a feature packed low-cost solution for enterprise training and management needs. U learn LMS provides integrated solution to manage Class based trainings (CBT), Web based trainings(WBT) or blend of both.
11.[1 9]accessibility analysis and evaluation of government websites in devel...
This document analyzes and evaluates the accessibility of government websites in Bangladesh according to the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG). It finds that many government websites in Bangladesh do not conform to WCAG guidelines and are not accessible to people with disabilities. The study examines accessibility evaluation tools and guidelines. It analyzes ten Bangladesh government websites and finds many issues that prevent accessibility, such as lack of text alternatives for images. The document recommends improvements to make e-government websites in developing countries more accessible.
Accessibility Report for training website
1) The document reports on the results of running various accessibility tests on a website about portioning an Olive Garden salad. Tests included the Dreamweaver workflow and HTML reports, the WAVE tool, and tests on Juicy Studio including color ratio, readability, and images.
2) The tests found issues like missing alt text, low color contrast, tables that were inaccessible to screen readers, and readability levels that were too high. These issues were corrected immediately or with set dates for correction.
3) Running the accessibility tests was a valuable learning experience and revealed that accessibility best practices need to be continuously followed and improved upon to ensure all users can access digital content.
Don't Panic! How to perform an accessibility evaluation with limited resources
Being tasked with an accessibility evaluation is can be daunting. How can you measure accessibility? What disabilities are the most important? What tools do you need? How long will it take? Where do I start? What does "accessible" even mean?
These are all questions I asked myself last year when I performed my first accessibility eval. This session will share everything I learned since then in performing three accessibility evaluations.
HERA-FFX - a Firefox Add-on for semi-automatic web accessibility evaluation
Presentation of paper by Jose Fuertes, Ricardo Gonzalez, Emmanuelle Gutierrez and Loic Martinez on the HERA-FFX accessibility evaluation tool. Full paper available from the ACM Digital Library.
Evaluating Web Accessibility For Specific Mobile Devices
The document discusses evaluating web accessibility for specific mobile devices. It proposes extending existing mobile accessibility guidelines to account for varying device capabilities. The approach retrieves a web page's content and the device's profile to dynamically generate tests. These tests are used to evaluate the page and produce a tailored accessibility report for that device. A case study found the approach reduced false positives and negatives compared to generic tests.
More Related Content
What's hot
Evaluating Content Management Systems in Academic Libraries
This document summarizes a study that evaluated content management systems (CMS) used in academic libraries. A survey of library staff found that CMS generally made web development easier but satisfaction varied by system. While CMS simplified content management, institutionally mandated templates sometimes limited customization. Templates prioritized institutional branding over library usability. The benefits of CMS were ease of use and content control, but limitations included lacking features and templates not considering library needs.
Synsoft global online examination system
Synsoft Global offers an online examination system software that allows organizations to administer exams online. The software allows organizations to create exams across different topics and difficulty levels, manage user profiles and test settings, display timers for timed exams, and provide results to organizational administrators for evaluation. The online examination system is a cost-effective option for educational institutions, companies conducting recruitments, and those requiring employee assessments.
QV Automated Testing Overview
The document provides an overview of developments in automated testing and computerized test evaluation systems. It discusses 10 key areas: 1) background and evolution of automated testing, 2) planning valid tests, 3) developing tests, 4) various item formats, 5) administering tests, 6) scoring and reporting, 7) psychometric analysis, 8) communications, 9) security concerns, and 10) ensuring accessibility. The final comments note continuing evolution in areas like bandwidth, delivery methods, item formats, administration features, and adherence to proper development processes.
MIS 49100 Week 2 Systems Development Life Cycle
The document discusses the six phases of the Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC) methodology for project development: 1) Preliminary Investigation assesses feasibility, 2) System Analysis studies requirements, 3) System Design plans alternatives, 4) System Development builds the system, 5) System Implementation installs and trains users on the new system, and 6) System Operation and Maintenance provides ongoing support. Each phase is described in detail, outlining key activities, tools used, and documentation produced.
Blog - Affordances Analysis
Blogs can be used by health professionals to chronicle treatment approaches for de-identified patients, enhancing constructivist learning for both the author and followers. Features like embedding images and video can support educational text. Tags and links help users find relevant health information. Blogs allow for single or multi-author setups, personalization of design, and inclusion of multimedia. Their accessibility across devices and platforms supports interaction at both workplace and community levels.
Standards Based Approach to User Interface Development
Standards Based Approach to User Interface Development presentation at ACM SIGCHI conference Bangalore
Creative Content and Quality Testing in Mobile Applications -Suzanne Marie Fr...
Creative Content and Quality Testing in Mobile Applications -Suzanne Marie Fr...TAUS - The Language Data Network
In this session, the challenges of localizing and evaluating creative content will be discussed. There is a pressing need to ensure quality even for marketing, game, hospitality, multimedia and mobile content just to name a few. One of the aims of the session is to define what’s relevant to QE for content that might have a short life cycle or low visibility within the product versus aspects of user experience that might be more critical. Speakers will discuss the role of traditional linguistic and functional quality testing versus new approaches that focus on areas that users might consider more important. How to balance quality - as we currently define it - with real expectations set by users, keeping in mind that user expectations might touch a variety of product areas and not include linguistic quality at all?
Session leader: Margarita Núñez-González (Simultrans)
Panelists: Suzanne Marie Frank (Vistatec), Orly González Kahn (Google)State of the art on the cognitive walkthrough method by MAHATODY, SAGAR and ...
This document reviews the evolution and variants of the Cognitive Walkthrough (CW) usability inspection method. It discusses the original 3 versions of CW proposed by its creators, as well as 11 significant extensions and variants developed by other researchers to address limitations. The extensions include variants for specific contexts like the web, groupware systems, and distributed teams. The document concludes with 4 summaries on conceptual aspects, comparative studies, non-comparative studies, and guidance on choosing a CW variant.
Finalversionasofapr30
The document discusses using Qualtrics to streamline the student application process for a nurse extern program. It describes the previous challenges with managing applications through email and manual data entry. Implementing an online Qualtrics survey provided an easy user-friendly form for both students and faculty. It allowed the program to efficiently track applicants, confirm submissions, and weed out ineligible candidates. The Qualtrics system provided collaborative access and the ability to easily find information. Lessons from the first year were discussed, such as combining essays and providing file upload options to further improve the application process.
Leveraging Academic Analytics in System Administration, Professional Developm...
Identifying, collecting, reporting, and using system activity data from Blackboard is often a challenge. Come to this session to learn about a series of free Building Blocks that are available (such as bbStats and Project ASTRO) that enable you to collect, generate, and leverage reports of faculty and student activity in Blackboard.
Consumer Health Website
A student project proposal for a conceptual consumer health website. Masters of Health Informatics, University of Toronto.
User Experience and Accessibility
This document summarizes a study that analyzed the user experience and accessibility of county web portals. It applied usability heuristics and accessibility standards to evaluate 39 Alabama county portals. The study found that 58% of counties had adopted web portals, but portals only met an average of 10-11 out of 14 usability criteria. Only 10.8% of portals had no coding errors, and 15.8% supported new technologies like mobile. The study recommends portals go beyond standards to improve usability for all users and better support mobile devices.
The reviewerrole
Reviewers receive email notifications when students submit work for review. Reviewers provide feedback by adding comments to submitted assignments rather than filling out formal evaluations. Reviewers can access submitted work from the reviewer tab and see if new feedback has been requested or added. They can filter the work by student, title, and type. Comments are entered line by line for lessons and units, while individual comments are added for each requirement in DRF programs. Additional information about programs and students can be found in program links.
Web application testing
Web application automated testing or rather automated website testing involves usage of various types of software automation testing tools to evaluate the performance of a website.
https://www.testingxperts.com/blog/web-application-automated-testing
ASK THE USERS: EXPECTATIONS, BEHAVIORS AND SATISFACTION OF ONLINE ARCHIVE...
presentation at "Archives Online. It's all about choices" EABH Workshop, 28 Apr 2016, Vienna, Austria
Open Sample Intro Pgraham 0910
OpenSample is an industry initiative to improve the quality of online surveys through sharing information about respondents' survey participation histories across survey companies. The initiative aims to create an independent database tracked by a trusted third party to consolidate anonymous metadata on surveys taken. This would allow survey companies to query the database to obtain information about their respondents' participation in other panels. Several working groups are formed to handle technical, legal, research and outreach aspects to make the initiative operational by January 2009. Participation in contributing data and using the results is voluntary.
U Learn Learning Management System
U learn LMS is a feature packed low-cost solution for enterprise training and management needs. U learn LMS provides integrated solution to manage Class based trainings (CBT), Web based trainings(WBT) or blend of both.
What's hot (17)
Evaluating Content Management Systems in Academic Libraries
Evaluating Content Management Systems in Academic Libraries
Standards Based Approach to User Interface Development
Standards Based Approach to User Interface Development
Creative Content and Quality Testing in Mobile Applications -Suzanne Marie Fr...
Creative Content and Quality Testing in Mobile Applications -Suzanne Marie Fr...
State of the art on the cognitive walkthrough method by MAHATODY, SAGAR and ...
State of the art on the cognitive walkthrough method by MAHATODY, SAGAR and ...
Leveraging Academic Analytics in System Administration, Professional Developm...
Leveraging Academic Analytics in System Administration, Professional Developm...
ASK THE USERS: EXPECTATIONS, BEHAVIORS AND SATISFACTION OF ONLINE ARCHIVE...
ASK THE USERS: EXPECTATIONS, BEHAVIORS AND SATISFACTION OF ONLINE ARCHIVE...
Viewers also liked
11.[1 9]accessibility analysis and evaluation of government websites in devel...
This document analyzes and evaluates the accessibility of government websites in Bangladesh according to the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG). It finds that many government websites in Bangladesh do not conform to WCAG guidelines and are not accessible to people with disabilities. The study examines accessibility evaluation tools and guidelines. It analyzes ten Bangladesh government websites and finds many issues that prevent accessibility, such as lack of text alternatives for images. The document recommends improvements to make e-government websites in developing countries more accessible.
Accessibility Report for training website
1) The document reports on the results of running various accessibility tests on a website about portioning an Olive Garden salad. Tests included the Dreamweaver workflow and HTML reports, the WAVE tool, and tests on Juicy Studio including color ratio, readability, and images.
2) The tests found issues like missing alt text, low color contrast, tables that were inaccessible to screen readers, and readability levels that were too high. These issues were corrected immediately or with set dates for correction.
3) Running the accessibility tests was a valuable learning experience and revealed that accessibility best practices need to be continuously followed and improved upon to ensure all users can access digital content.
Don't Panic! How to perform an accessibility evaluation with limited resources
Being tasked with an accessibility evaluation is can be daunting. How can you measure accessibility? What disabilities are the most important? What tools do you need? How long will it take? Where do I start? What does "accessible" even mean?
These are all questions I asked myself last year when I performed my first accessibility eval. This session will share everything I learned since then in performing three accessibility evaluations.
HERA-FFX - a Firefox Add-on for semi-automatic web accessibility evaluation
Presentation of paper by Jose Fuertes, Ricardo Gonzalez, Emmanuelle Gutierrez and Loic Martinez on the HERA-FFX accessibility evaluation tool. Full paper available from the ACM Digital Library.
Evaluating Web Accessibility For Specific Mobile Devices
The document discusses evaluating web accessibility for specific mobile devices. It proposes extending existing mobile accessibility guidelines to account for varying device capabilities. The approach retrieves a web page's content and the device's profile to dynamically generate tests. These tests are used to evaluate the page and produce a tailored accessibility report for that device. A case study found the approach reduced false positives and negatives compared to generic tests.
Reading Systems Showdown: CSUN 2014 Presentation
E-readers (reading systems primarily used for consuming digital book content) and general purpose tablets with reading apps, such as the iPad, Kindle HD or Nexus 7, are becoming popular options for reading the expanding selection of publications available in electronic formats. Specialized players still have accessibility advantages, but developers are now attempting to make their products more accessible to people with visual and dexterity disabilities. Accessibility evaluations can assist educators, students, developers and manufacturers.
Viewers also liked (6)
11.[1 9]accessibility analysis and evaluation of government websites in devel...
11.[1 9]accessibility analysis and evaluation of government websites in devel...
Don't Panic! How to perform an accessibility evaluation with limited resources
Don't Panic! How to perform an accessibility evaluation with limited resources
HERA-FFX - a Firefox Add-on for semi-automatic web accessibility evaluation
HERA-FFX - a Firefox Add-on for semi-automatic web accessibility evaluation
Evaluating Web Accessibility For Specific Mobile Devices
Evaluating Web Accessibility For Specific Mobile Devices
Similar to W4A 2010 Education Tool to Support the Educational Process Chris Bailey
Streamlined Product Evaluation
When you have limited resources and no access to users, this process will allow you to evaluate a product's usability and present findings and recommendations to the product team.
Writing Studio
Presentation outlining recommendations from a usability study conducted for the Writing Studio (http://writing.colostate.edu). By Andrea L. Beaudin, Jeremy F. Huston, and Michael R. Trice
Application of Traditional Software Testing Methodologies to Web Accessibility
The document discusses various methods for testing the accessibility of web applications, including user testing, automated validation, auditing, and traditional software testing. It provides details on how each method can be used to test accessibility, as well as potential issues and limitations. The key message is that accessibility can be improved by treating it as one of many quality metrics and applying traditional software testing methods throughout the development life cycle.
What I Learned In Pr Writing
Heuristic evaluation is a usability inspection method where 3-5 evaluators examine a user interface and judge its compliance with recognized usability principles called "heuristics." Each evaluator independently explores the interface twice and notes any violations of heuristics, such as consistency, visibility of system status, or flexibility of use. Evaluators then aggregate their findings and rate the severity of identified usability problems to prioritize fixes. With 3-5 evaluators, heuristic evaluation typically identifies around 75% of usability issues in a cost-effective manner.
Designfor Strangers
The document discusses various methods for evaluating user experience design when users are located in different countries, including heuristic evaluation, usability testing, and GOMS analysis. Heuristic evaluation involves having 3-5 evaluators examine a user interface and note where it violates established usability heuristics. Usability testing involves testing an interface with real users performing representative tasks and collecting both quantitative and qualitative data. GOMS analysis estimates the time required to complete tasks based on the number and types of user actions involved.
Qué es un blog?
The document discusses various methods for evaluating user experience design when users are located in different countries, including heuristic evaluation, usability testing, GOMS analysis, and collecting different types of data. Heuristic evaluation involves having 3-5 evaluators examine a user interface and identify usability issues based on usability heuristics. Usability testing involves testing an interface with real users to observe what they do and collect their feedback. GOMS analysis estimates the time and effort required to complete tasks in an interface. It is recommended to use multiple evaluation methods and data types to get a comprehensive understanding of the user experience.
Design For Strangers
Heuristic evaluation is a usability inspection method where 3-5 evaluators examine a user interface and judge its compliance with recognized usability principles called "heuristics." Each evaluator independently explores the interface twice and notes any violations of heuristics, such as consistency, visibility of system status, or flexibility of use. Evaluators then meet to aggregate their findings and determine the severity of usability problems. With 3-5 evaluators, heuristic evaluation can find around 75% of usability issues in a cost-effective manner.
Designfor Strangers
The document discusses various methods for evaluating user experience design when users are located in different countries, including heuristic evaluation, usability testing, and GOMS analysis. Heuristic evaluation involves having 3-5 evaluators examine a user interface and note where it violates established usability heuristics. Usability testing involves testing an interface with real users performing representative tasks and collecting both quantitative and qualitative data. GOMS analysis estimates the time required to complete tasks based on the number and types of user actions involved.
Biblioteca.
The document discusses various methods for evaluating user experience design when users are located in different countries, including heuristic evaluation, usability testing, GOMS analysis, and collecting different types of data. Heuristic evaluation involves having 3-5 evaluators examine a user interface and identify usability issues based on established usability heuristics. Usability testing involves testing an interface with real users to observe what they do and collect their feedback. GOMS analysis estimates the time and cognitive effort required to complete tasks in an interface. The document recommends using multiple evaluation methods and data collection approaches to comprehensively evaluate a remote user experience.
Rashmi Xerox Parc
The document discusses various methods for evaluating user experience when users are located in different countries, including heuristic evaluation, usability testing, GOMS analysis, and collecting different types of data. Heuristic evaluation involves having 3-5 evaluators examine a user interface and identify usability issues based on established usability heuristics. Usability testing involves testing an interface with real users to observe what they do and collect their feedback. GOMS analysis estimates the time and cognitive load required to complete tasks in an interface. The document recommends using multiple evaluation methods and data collection approaches to comprehensively evaluate remote user experience.
Designfor strangers
The document discusses various methods for evaluating user experience design when users are located in different countries, including heuristic evaluation, usability testing, and GOMS analysis. Heuristic evaluation involves having 3-5 evaluators examine a user interface and note where it violates recognized usability principles or heuristics. Usability testing involves testing an interface with representative users and collecting both qualitative and quantitative data on their experiences. GOMS analysis estimates the time and cognitive load required to complete tasks in an interface based on the basic operations involved.
Designfor Strangers
Heuristic evaluation is a usability inspection method where 3-5 evaluators examine a user interface and judge its compliance with recognized usability principles called "heuristics." Each evaluator independently explores the interface twice and notes any violations of heuristics, such as consistency, visibility of system status, or flexibility of use. Evaluators then meet to aggregate their findings and rate the severity of any usability problems. With 3-5 evaluators, heuristic evaluation can find around 75% of usability issues in a user interface.
Designfo#{1} #{2}trangers
The document discusses various methods for evaluating user experience when users are located in different countries, including heuristic evaluation, usability testing, GOMS analysis, and collecting different types of data. Heuristic evaluation involves having 3-5 evaluators examine a user interface and identify any violations of usability principles or heuristics. Usability testing involves testing the interface with representative users performing tasks and collecting both quantitative and qualitative data. GOMS analysis estimates the time required to complete tasks based on the number and types of user actions. The document recommends using multiple evaluation methods and data collection approaches.
Webinar Agile Presentation V.1.0
- The document discusses agile usability testing conducted by fhios, a user experience research center, for a financial services provider redesigning websites for mortgages, savings, and bank accounts.
- Usability testing was conducted iteratively over 3 weeks with 45 participants testing low-fidelity prototypes in 3 iterations to identify usability issues and ensure the prototypes met user needs.
- Findings from each iteration were reported to developers and incorporated into the next iteration, allowing continuous user validation and improvements to be made quickly within sprints.
Chapter 7)
The document provides information about managing a website, including testing and evaluating it before and after publishing. It discusses submitting project documents, presentations, and exams. It also covers levels of web development, maintenance, testing the site for errors, and evaluating the design. Methods of acquiring server space, obtaining a domain name, and uploading the site are also outlined.
Advanced Internet
The document discusses various aspects of usability testing and evaluation for websites, including definitions, methods, and best practices. Specifically, it describes heuristic evaluation, which involves examining a user interface against recognized usability principles and industry standards. Ten common usability heuristics are outlined, such as ensuring visibility of system status and having a clear match between the system and the real world. Evaluation criteria also cover areas like navigation, functionality, branding, documentation, and instructions.
QA_Resume
Anjali is seeking a challenging position utilizing her 2.5 years of experience as a QA Analyst and 6 months as a Software Test Engineer. She has skills in Windows, Java, Selenium, Webdriver and has experience testing websites, software, Blu-ray/DVDs. Anjali aims to quickly learn new technologies and improve processes through quality control, test planning, and report preparation. She is proficient in functional, regression, and mobile testing using frameworks like Selenium and has expertise in SQL, ASP.NET, and HTML.
web project Management
This document discusses key aspects of web engineering projects. It covers web project management, steps for successful development, challenges in web system design, and approaches to web testing and evaluation. Regarding project management, it emphasizes the importance of leadership, communication skills, and accountability. For development, it outlines a process involving requirements gathering, architecture design, implementation, and ongoing refinement. Design challenges include usability, performance, security, and maintaining evolvability. The document advocates proactive testing throughout the development lifecycle to ensure quality and avoid costly issues later on.
Usability and evolution Human computer intraction.ppt
The document discusses usability and evaluation in human-computer interaction. It defines usability as how well a system supports users' cognitive abilities and is easy to use and learn. Evaluation assesses both functionality and usability. Usability is measured through indicators like success rates, errors, and learnability. Evaluation methods include thinking aloud, observation, interviews and questionnaires. The goal of usability testing is to identify problems and determine user satisfaction before full development.
Accessibility, Usability and User Centred Design (Usability workshop)
This document outlines instructions for a usability testing workshop. It instructs groups of 3 to 5 members to assess the usability of a web application by considering its purpose, content, navigation, and user inputs. The groups are asked to test a social networking, e-government, or e-learning website and provide a report with the website details, testing strategy, results, and recommendations. The report should also include a reflection on the assessment process. The document recommends using both performance and satisfaction metrics for a valid face-to-face or online usability test. It also provides resources for usability testing tools.
Similar to W4A 2010 Education Tool to Support the Educational Process Chris Bailey (20)
Application of Traditional Software Testing Methodologies to Web Accessibility
Application of Traditional Software Testing Methodologies to Web Accessibility
Usability and evolution Human computer intraction.ppt
Usability and evolution Human computer intraction.ppt
Accessibility, Usability and User Centred Design (Usability workshop)
Accessibility, Usability and User Centred Design (Usability workshop)
Recently uploaded
How to deliver Powerpoint Presentations.pptx
"How to make and deliver dynamic presentations by making it more interactive to captivate your audience attention"
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar KanvariaMain Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docx
This is part 1 of my Java Learning Journey. This Contains Custom methods, classes, constructors, packages, multithreading , try- catch block, finally block and more.
PCOS corelations and management through Ayurveda.
This presentation includes basic of PCOS their pathology and treatment and also Ayurveda correlation of PCOS and Ayurvedic line of treatment mentioned in classics.
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptx
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptxMohd Adib Abd Muin, Senior Lecturer at Universiti Utara Malaysia
This slide is special for master students (MIBS & MIFB) in UUM. Also useful for readers who are interested in the topic of contemporary Islamic banking.
The History of Stoke Newington Street Names
Presented at the Stoke Newington Literary Festival on 9th June 2024
www.StokeNewingtonHistory.com
Wound healing PPT
This document provides an overview of wound healing, its functions, stages, mechanisms, factors affecting it, and complications.
A wound is a break in the integrity of the skin or tissues, which may be associated with disruption of the structure and function.
Healing is the body’s response to injury in an attempt to restore normal structure and functions.
Healing can occur in two ways: Regeneration and Repair
There are 4 phases of wound healing: hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling. This document also describes the mechanism of wound healing. Factors that affect healing include infection, uncontrolled diabetes, poor nutrition, age, anemia, the presence of foreign bodies, etc.
Complications of wound healing like infection, hyperpigmentation of scar, contractures, and keloid formation.
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective Upskilling
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective UpskillingExcellence Foundation for South Sudan
Strategies for Effective Upskilling is a presentation by Chinwendu Peace in a Your Skill Boost Masterclass organisation by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan on 08th and 09th June 2024 from 1 PM to 3 PM on each day.Reimagining Your Library Space: How to Increase the Vibes in Your Library No ...
Librarians are leading the way in creating future-ready citizens – now we need to update our spaces to match. In this session, attendees will get inspiration for transforming their library spaces. You’ll learn how to survey students and patrons, create a focus group, and use design thinking to brainstorm ideas for your space. We’ll discuss budget friendly ways to change your space as well as how to find funding. No matter where you’re at, you’ll find ideas for reimagining your space in this session.
BBR 2024 Summer Sessions Interview Training
Qualitative research interview training by Professor Katrina Pritchard and Dr Helen Williams
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold Method
Odoo provides an option for creating a module by using a single line command. By using this command the user can make a whole structure of a module. It is very easy for a beginner to make a module. There is no need to make each file manually. This slide will show how to create a module using the scaffold method.
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 Inventory
In this slide, we'll explore how to set up warehouses and locations in Odoo 17 Inventory. This will help us manage our stock effectively, track inventory levels, and streamline warehouse operations.
Recently uploaded (20)
Liberal Approach to the Study of Indian Politics.pdf
Liberal Approach to the Study of Indian Politics.pdf
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptx
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptx
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective Upskilling
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective Upskilling
Reimagining Your Library Space: How to Increase the Vibes in Your Library No ...
Reimagining Your Library Space: How to Increase the Vibes in Your Library No ...
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold Method
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold Method
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 Inventory
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 Inventory
W4A 2010 Education Tool to Support the Educational Process Chris Bailey
- 1. Christopher Bailey Dr. Elaine Pearson Teesside University [email_address] An Educational Tool to Support the Accessibility Evaluation Process
- 9. Christopher Bailey Dr. Elaine Pearson Teesside University [email_address] An Educational Tool to Support the Accessibility Evaluation Process
Editor's Notes
- This slide contains a screenshot of the application if I am unable to demonstrate tool.
- This slide contains a screenshot of the application if I am unable to demonstrate tool.
- This slide contains a screenshot of the application if I am unable to demonstrate tool.