This document provides information and links for purchasing assignments for the CRJ 501 course through Ashford University. It lists assignments for each week of the course, including journals, papers, and a final systems paper. The assignments require students to analyze and discuss Supreme Court cases related to criminal justice topics like police use of force, search and seizure, and Miranda rights. The document encourages students to purchase the assignments in order to receive tutorials and guidelines to help complete the work. It also provides the course description and learning outcomes for CRJ 501.
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
Use the Internet to research three (3) real-life incidents from the past five (5) years that fall under the following topics:
Theories of victimization and corresponding examples
Criminal activity
Cja 415 Enthusiastic Study / snaptutorial.comStephenson25
Use the Internet to research three (3) real-life incidents from the past five (5) years that fall under the following topics:
Theories of victimization and corresponding examples
Criminal activity
Crime that occurred within your community
Assignment 1: Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendment Rights
Due Week 4 and worth 150 points
The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects citizens against police officers making unreasonable searches and seizures of personal property. The Fifth and Sixth Amendments guarantee the procedures that the courts and police must use to ensure fair treatment of persons arrested for crimes.
Analyze the following cases in preparation for a systematic approach for a synthesis of law and fact.
LEG 420 Massive Success / snaptutorial.comStephenson159
Due Week 4 and worth 150 points
The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects citizens against police officers making unreasonable searches and seizures of personal property. The Fifth and Sixth Amendments guarantee the procedures that the courts and police must use to ensure fair treatment of persons arrested for crimes.
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
Use the Internet to research three (3) real-life incidents from the past five (5) years that fall under the following topics:
Theories of victimization and corresponding examples
Criminal activity
Cja 415 Enthusiastic Study / snaptutorial.comStephenson25
Use the Internet to research three (3) real-life incidents from the past five (5) years that fall under the following topics:
Theories of victimization and corresponding examples
Criminal activity
Crime that occurred within your community
Assignment 1: Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendment Rights
Due Week 4 and worth 150 points
The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects citizens against police officers making unreasonable searches and seizures of personal property. The Fifth and Sixth Amendments guarantee the procedures that the courts and police must use to ensure fair treatment of persons arrested for crimes.
Analyze the following cases in preparation for a systematic approach for a synthesis of law and fact.
LEG 420 Massive Success / snaptutorial.comStephenson159
Due Week 4 and worth 150 points
The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects citizens against police officers making unreasonable searches and seizures of personal property. The Fifth and Sixth Amendments guarantee the procedures that the courts and police must use to ensure fair treatment of persons arrested for crimes.
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
As you read, many defendants in the criminal justice system are prosecuted in state courts, which means that for the most part prosecutors rely on state case law and statutes as guidelines for whether or not they should be charged. In this assignment, you will select a defendant who has been prosecuted in your state court.
As you read, many defendants in the criminal justice system are prosecuted in state courts, which means that for the most part prosecutors rely on state case law and statutes as guidelines for whether or not they should be charged. In this assignment, you will select a defendant who has been prosecuted in your state court. Describe, in 1 page, the case against the defendant and the crimes for which the defendant has been charged. Examine the punishment assigned to the offender. If the offender you chose was acquitted or has not yet reached the punishment stage, you will still be able to examine the punishments that were available.
Cja 140 Enthusiastic Study / snaptutorial.comStephenson20
As you read, many defendants in the criminal justice system are prosecuted in state courts, which means that for the most part prosecutors rely on state case law and statutes as guidelines for whether or not they should be charged. In this assignment, you will select a defendant who has been prosecuted in your state court. Describe, in 1 page, the case against the defendant and the crimes for which the defendant has been charged. Examine the punishment assigned to the offender. If the offender you chose was acquitted or has not yet reached the punishment stage, you will still be able to examine the punishments that were available.
Running head: GROUP PROJECT 1
1
ASSIGNMENT 5
Kenyeta Clements
March 25, 2017
CCJS 495
Mark Weissman
Criminal Justice Component in America
The United States criminal justice system is subdivided into three branches that all correlate. The first component is the law enforcement system (Hall, 2004). Under this component, there are individual’s assigned jurisdictions such as sheriffs and their deputies and even patrol officers. Federal agents, game and parks rangers, detectives and other individuals that usually make the first contact with criminals are also inclusive in this bracket of peacekeepers. Basically, at this point, the justice system mainly contains those that make the first contact with criminals. These persons major responsibility is to uphold the law by apprehending those committing a particular crime (Lofstrom, & Raphael, 2016). It is not their responsibility to prosecute or charge anyone with any allegations their particular job is to arrest and submit to courts. Law enforcement individuals must be knowledgeable of the individual rights of suspected offenders such as Miranda rights, search and seizure rights and reasonable stops to name a few. Officers also need to be aware of citizens' and civil rights so as not to violate those rights or compromise an investigation if a crime was indeed committed. These are important things as they would even lead to the jeopardy of a case or cases filed against a criminal officer or would lead to the civil rights society having problems with the officers. If for example, an officer had no search warrant that allows him or her to search a particular premise but goes ahead with the activity, the would raise queries against his or her eligibility. In cases where forensics are needed also an officer might end up interfering with evidence of a whole case even if the crime was genuinely committed.
The second and the most key component of these justice systems is the court (Hall, 2004). The first component which includes patrol police and the sheriffs are all submissive to the courts. Some of the key role players in this component include judges, attorneys, magistrates, lawyers and the jury. Many of these positions being elective, such as the district attorney and the judges. Defense attorneys are generally private practice attorneys who specialize in certain areas of the law, such as family law or drug law, and are hired by a defendant. Public defenders are defense attorneys who are appointed to individuals who cannot afford an attorney (Lofstrom, & Raphael, 2016). These defenders are either appointed from a public defender office or are part of a rotating pro bono requirement from the court. For example, in some family law courts, the public defenders are private atto ...
Assignment 4 Contemporary Issues in Modern Police Operations and .docxrock73
Assignment 4: Contemporary Issues in Modern Police Operations and the Policing
Due Week 10 and worth 180 points
Select two (2) contemporary issues in modern police operations and examine the related law enforcement agencies, change, and efficiency. The suggested contemporary issues are below:
· Terrorism
· Police evidence collection
· Children and juvenile
· Law enforcement hiring process
· Criminal investigation
· Gangs and drugs
· Police patrol
· Or other issues or topics from the textbook that interest you
Write a six (6) page paper in which you:
1. Summarize the history of law enforcement operations as it relates to the issue(s) that you selected.
2. Determine the key law enforcement agencies that are responsible for enforcing law related to your chosen issue(s).
3. Explain at least one (1) major change to law enforcement operations related to the issue(s) that you selected. Next, provide at least one (1) reason why the identified change was necessary. Support your response.
4. Give your opinion as to whether or not the change that you determined in Question 3 improved police operations in dealing with your selected issue(s). Provide a rationale for your response.
5. Discuss the main requirements related to training that local and federal law enforcement agencies must address as they relate to your selected issue(s).
6. Use at least three (3) quality academic resources as references, such as journal articles, newspapers, magazines, and publications from law enforcement associations. Note: Wikipedia, blogs, and similar websites do not qualify as quality academic resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
· Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
· Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
· Demonstrate knowledge of the history of law enforcement.
· Compare and contrast the hierarchy of command associated with modern law enforcement agencies.
· Discuss the theoretical undertones of policing strategies (i.e., community policing, patrol patterns).
· Discuss ideological and practical positions and debate controversial issues in policing.
· Examine the requirements of local and federal agency training requirements.
· Use technology and information resources to research advanced issues in law enforcement.
· Write clearly and concisely about advanced issues in law enforcement using proper grammar and mechanics.
Click here to view the assignment rubric.
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing ski ...
CJ 500 Sample Case Brief Facts Mr. Miranda was arrestVinaOconner450
CJ 500 Sample Case Brief
Facts: Mr. Miranda was arrested at his residence, taken into custody, and subsequently brought
to the police station. While in custody at the police station, Mr. Miranda was identified by a
witness who made an accusation and complaint against him. Mr. Miranda was then interrogated
by police officers for approximately two hours. Mr. Miranda subsequently confessed to the crime
and gave a signed, written confession. Mr. Miranda was never advised of his right to counsel or
his right to remain silent. At trial, the oral and written confessions were presented to the jury.
Miranda was found guilty of kidnapping and rape and was sentenced to 20 to 30 years
imprisonment on each count. On appeal, the Supreme Court of Arizona held that Miranda’s
constitutional rights were not violated in obtaining the confession.
Issue: Whether statements that are obtained from an individual who is in custody and being
interrogated are admissible at trial if the suspect has not been advised of his Fifth Amendment
privilege to remain silent and his Sixth Amendment right to counsel.
Ruling: Confession received in violation of an individual’s Fifth Amendment and Sixth
Amendment privileges are inadmissible in trial if the individual has not been advised of his or
her rights.
Analysis: The court held that
there can be no doubt that the Fifth Amendment privilege is available outside of criminal
court proceedings and serves to protect persons in all settings in which their freedom of
action is curtailed in any significant way from being compelled to incriminate
themselves. (Miranda v. Arizona, 1966)
As such,
the prosecution may not use statements, whether exculpatory or inculpatory, stemming
from custodial interrogation of the defendant unless it demonstrates the use of procedural
safeguards effective to secure the privilege against self-incrimination. By custodial
interrogation, we mean questioning initiated by law enforcement officers after a person
has been taken into custody or otherwise deprived of his freedom of action in any
significant way. (Miranda v. Arizona, 1966)
The court further held that
without proper safeguards the process of in-custody interrogation of persons suspected or
accused of crime contains inherently compelling pressures which work to undermine the
individual’s will to resist and to compel him to speak where he would otherwise do so
freely. (Miranda v. Arizona, 1966)
Therefore, a defendant
must be warned prior to any questioning that he has the right to remain silent, that
anything he says can be used against him in a court of law, that he has the right to the
presence of an attorney, and that if he cannot afford an attorney one will be appointed for
him prior to any questioning if he so desires. (Miranda v. Arizona, 1966)
Conclusion: Based on the aforementioned reasons, the U.S. Supreme Court overruled and
reversed the conviction of ...
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
https://www.uopassignments.com/elm-530-grand-canyon-university
For more classes visit
http://www.uopassignments.com/
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
https://www.uopassignments.com/eed-475-grand-canyon-university
For more classes visit
http://www.uopassignments.com/
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
https://www.uopassignments.com/eed-470-grand-canyon-university
For more classes visit
http://www.uopassignments.com/
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
As you read, many defendants in the criminal justice system are prosecuted in state courts, which means that for the most part prosecutors rely on state case law and statutes as guidelines for whether or not they should be charged. In this assignment, you will select a defendant who has been prosecuted in your state court.
As you read, many defendants in the criminal justice system are prosecuted in state courts, which means that for the most part prosecutors rely on state case law and statutes as guidelines for whether or not they should be charged. In this assignment, you will select a defendant who has been prosecuted in your state court. Describe, in 1 page, the case against the defendant and the crimes for which the defendant has been charged. Examine the punishment assigned to the offender. If the offender you chose was acquitted or has not yet reached the punishment stage, you will still be able to examine the punishments that were available.
Cja 140 Enthusiastic Study / snaptutorial.comStephenson20
As you read, many defendants in the criminal justice system are prosecuted in state courts, which means that for the most part prosecutors rely on state case law and statutes as guidelines for whether or not they should be charged. In this assignment, you will select a defendant who has been prosecuted in your state court. Describe, in 1 page, the case against the defendant and the crimes for which the defendant has been charged. Examine the punishment assigned to the offender. If the offender you chose was acquitted or has not yet reached the punishment stage, you will still be able to examine the punishments that were available.
Running head: GROUP PROJECT 1
1
ASSIGNMENT 5
Kenyeta Clements
March 25, 2017
CCJS 495
Mark Weissman
Criminal Justice Component in America
The United States criminal justice system is subdivided into three branches that all correlate. The first component is the law enforcement system (Hall, 2004). Under this component, there are individual’s assigned jurisdictions such as sheriffs and their deputies and even patrol officers. Federal agents, game and parks rangers, detectives and other individuals that usually make the first contact with criminals are also inclusive in this bracket of peacekeepers. Basically, at this point, the justice system mainly contains those that make the first contact with criminals. These persons major responsibility is to uphold the law by apprehending those committing a particular crime (Lofstrom, & Raphael, 2016). It is not their responsibility to prosecute or charge anyone with any allegations their particular job is to arrest and submit to courts. Law enforcement individuals must be knowledgeable of the individual rights of suspected offenders such as Miranda rights, search and seizure rights and reasonable stops to name a few. Officers also need to be aware of citizens' and civil rights so as not to violate those rights or compromise an investigation if a crime was indeed committed. These are important things as they would even lead to the jeopardy of a case or cases filed against a criminal officer or would lead to the civil rights society having problems with the officers. If for example, an officer had no search warrant that allows him or her to search a particular premise but goes ahead with the activity, the would raise queries against his or her eligibility. In cases where forensics are needed also an officer might end up interfering with evidence of a whole case even if the crime was genuinely committed.
The second and the most key component of these justice systems is the court (Hall, 2004). The first component which includes patrol police and the sheriffs are all submissive to the courts. Some of the key role players in this component include judges, attorneys, magistrates, lawyers and the jury. Many of these positions being elective, such as the district attorney and the judges. Defense attorneys are generally private practice attorneys who specialize in certain areas of the law, such as family law or drug law, and are hired by a defendant. Public defenders are defense attorneys who are appointed to individuals who cannot afford an attorney (Lofstrom, & Raphael, 2016). These defenders are either appointed from a public defender office or are part of a rotating pro bono requirement from the court. For example, in some family law courts, the public defenders are private atto ...
Assignment 4 Contemporary Issues in Modern Police Operations and .docxrock73
Assignment 4: Contemporary Issues in Modern Police Operations and the Policing
Due Week 10 and worth 180 points
Select two (2) contemporary issues in modern police operations and examine the related law enforcement agencies, change, and efficiency. The suggested contemporary issues are below:
· Terrorism
· Police evidence collection
· Children and juvenile
· Law enforcement hiring process
· Criminal investigation
· Gangs and drugs
· Police patrol
· Or other issues or topics from the textbook that interest you
Write a six (6) page paper in which you:
1. Summarize the history of law enforcement operations as it relates to the issue(s) that you selected.
2. Determine the key law enforcement agencies that are responsible for enforcing law related to your chosen issue(s).
3. Explain at least one (1) major change to law enforcement operations related to the issue(s) that you selected. Next, provide at least one (1) reason why the identified change was necessary. Support your response.
4. Give your opinion as to whether or not the change that you determined in Question 3 improved police operations in dealing with your selected issue(s). Provide a rationale for your response.
5. Discuss the main requirements related to training that local and federal law enforcement agencies must address as they relate to your selected issue(s).
6. Use at least three (3) quality academic resources as references, such as journal articles, newspapers, magazines, and publications from law enforcement associations. Note: Wikipedia, blogs, and similar websites do not qualify as quality academic resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
· Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
· Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
· Demonstrate knowledge of the history of law enforcement.
· Compare and contrast the hierarchy of command associated with modern law enforcement agencies.
· Discuss the theoretical undertones of policing strategies (i.e., community policing, patrol patterns).
· Discuss ideological and practical positions and debate controversial issues in policing.
· Examine the requirements of local and federal agency training requirements.
· Use technology and information resources to research advanced issues in law enforcement.
· Write clearly and concisely about advanced issues in law enforcement using proper grammar and mechanics.
Click here to view the assignment rubric.
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing ski ...
CJ 500 Sample Case Brief Facts Mr. Miranda was arrestVinaOconner450
CJ 500 Sample Case Brief
Facts: Mr. Miranda was arrested at his residence, taken into custody, and subsequently brought
to the police station. While in custody at the police station, Mr. Miranda was identified by a
witness who made an accusation and complaint against him. Mr. Miranda was then interrogated
by police officers for approximately two hours. Mr. Miranda subsequently confessed to the crime
and gave a signed, written confession. Mr. Miranda was never advised of his right to counsel or
his right to remain silent. At trial, the oral and written confessions were presented to the jury.
Miranda was found guilty of kidnapping and rape and was sentenced to 20 to 30 years
imprisonment on each count. On appeal, the Supreme Court of Arizona held that Miranda’s
constitutional rights were not violated in obtaining the confession.
Issue: Whether statements that are obtained from an individual who is in custody and being
interrogated are admissible at trial if the suspect has not been advised of his Fifth Amendment
privilege to remain silent and his Sixth Amendment right to counsel.
Ruling: Confession received in violation of an individual’s Fifth Amendment and Sixth
Amendment privileges are inadmissible in trial if the individual has not been advised of his or
her rights.
Analysis: The court held that
there can be no doubt that the Fifth Amendment privilege is available outside of criminal
court proceedings and serves to protect persons in all settings in which their freedom of
action is curtailed in any significant way from being compelled to incriminate
themselves. (Miranda v. Arizona, 1966)
As such,
the prosecution may not use statements, whether exculpatory or inculpatory, stemming
from custodial interrogation of the defendant unless it demonstrates the use of procedural
safeguards effective to secure the privilege against self-incrimination. By custodial
interrogation, we mean questioning initiated by law enforcement officers after a person
has been taken into custody or otherwise deprived of his freedom of action in any
significant way. (Miranda v. Arizona, 1966)
The court further held that
without proper safeguards the process of in-custody interrogation of persons suspected or
accused of crime contains inherently compelling pressures which work to undermine the
individual’s will to resist and to compel him to speak where he would otherwise do so
freely. (Miranda v. Arizona, 1966)
Therefore, a defendant
must be warned prior to any questioning that he has the right to remain silent, that
anything he says can be used against him in a court of law, that he has the right to the
presence of an attorney, and that if he cannot afford an attorney one will be appointed for
him prior to any questioning if he so desires. (Miranda v. Arizona, 1966)
Conclusion: Based on the aforementioned reasons, the U.S. Supreme Court overruled and
reversed the conviction of ...
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
https://www.uopassignments.com/elm-530-grand-canyon-university
For more classes visit
http://www.uopassignments.com/
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
https://www.uopassignments.com/eed-475-grand-canyon-university
For more classes visit
http://www.uopassignments.com/
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
https://www.uopassignments.com/eed-470-grand-canyon-university
For more classes visit
http://www.uopassignments.com/
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
https://www.uopassignments.com/eed-465-grand-canyon-university
For more classes visit
http://www.uopassignments.com/
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxtimhan337
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfkaushalkr1407
The Roman Empire, a vast and enduring power, stands as one of history's most remarkable civilizations, leaving an indelible imprint on the world. It emerged from the Roman Republic, transitioning into an imperial powerhouse under the leadership of Augustus Caesar in 27 BCE. This transformation marked the beginning of an era defined by unprecedented territorial expansion, architectural marvels, and profound cultural influence.
The empire's roots lie in the city of Rome, founded, according to legend, by Romulus in 753 BCE. Over centuries, Rome evolved from a small settlement to a formidable republic, characterized by a complex political system with elected officials and checks on power. However, internal strife, class conflicts, and military ambitions paved the way for the end of the Republic. Julius Caesar’s dictatorship and subsequent assassination in 44 BCE created a power vacuum, leading to a civil war. Octavian, later Augustus, emerged victorious, heralding the Roman Empire’s birth.
Under Augustus, the empire experienced the Pax Romana, a 200-year period of relative peace and stability. Augustus reformed the military, established efficient administrative systems, and initiated grand construction projects. The empire's borders expanded, encompassing territories from Britain to Egypt and from Spain to the Euphrates. Roman legions, renowned for their discipline and engineering prowess, secured and maintained these vast territories, building roads, fortifications, and cities that facilitated control and integration.
The Roman Empire’s society was hierarchical, with a rigid class system. At the top were the patricians, wealthy elites who held significant political power. Below them were the plebeians, free citizens with limited political influence, and the vast numbers of slaves who formed the backbone of the economy. The family unit was central, governed by the paterfamilias, the male head who held absolute authority.
Culturally, the Romans were eclectic, absorbing and adapting elements from the civilizations they encountered, particularly the Greeks. Roman art, literature, and philosophy reflected this synthesis, creating a rich cultural tapestry. Latin, the Roman language, became the lingua franca of the Western world, influencing numerous modern languages.
Roman architecture and engineering achievements were monumental. They perfected the arch, vault, and dome, constructing enduring structures like the Colosseum, Pantheon, and aqueducts. These engineering marvels not only showcased Roman ingenuity but also served practical purposes, from public entertainment to water supply.
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
1. ASH CRJ 501 All Assignments NEW
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.uopassignments.com/crj-501-
ash/crj-501-all-assignments-recent
For more classes visit
http://www.uopassignments.com
CRJ 501 All Assignments NEW
CRJ 501 Week 1 Journal Biological Explanations
of Crime NEW
CRJ 501 Week 2 Assignment Mens Rea and Actus
Reus NEW
CRJ 501 Week 2 Journal 4th Amendment and
Cellular Telephone Searches NEW
CRJ 501 Week 3 Assignment Police Use of Force
Tennessee v. Garner (1985)NEW
CRJ 501 Week 3 Assignment Police Use of Force
Graham v. Connor (1989)NEW
CRJ 501 Week 3 Journal NEW
CRJ 501 Week 4 Assignment Impact of Tennessee
v. Garner (1985) NEW
CRJ 501 Week 4 Journal Fleeing Felon NEW
CRJ 501 Week 6 Final Paper Systems Paper
Miranda v. Arizona (1966) NEW
2. ASH CRJ 501 Week 1 Journal Biological
Explanations of Crime NEW
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.uopassignments.com/crj-501-
ash/crj-501-week-1-journal-biological-
explanations-of-crime-recent
For more classes visit
http://www.uopassignments.com
CRJ 501 Week 1 Journal Biological Explanations
of Crime NEW
Week One Journal: Biological Explanations of
Crime. Due by Day 7. Genetic characteristics such
as intelligence, neurobiology, and
neurochemistry were once considered suitable
avenues of study in the quest to explain criminal
offending and violent behavior. These theories
then began a slow decline as they came to be
considered less than politically correct and were
dropped from many scholars’ research
schedules. In recent years various biological
theories and explanations of crime have started
to gain wider acceptance.
3. In your journal, reflect upon the social and
ethical ramifications of a wider acceptance for
biological explanations of crime. Identify how
the consideration of biological explanations of
crime could affect policy development, policing,
and the adjudication of offenders. Your journal
entry this week should be at least one page in
length.
4. ASH CRJ 501 Week 2 Assignment Mens Rea and
Actus Reus NEW
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.uopassignments.com/crj-501-
ash/crj-501-week-2-assignment-mens-rea-
and-actus-reus-recent
For more classes visit
http://www.uopassignments.com
CRJ 501 Week 2 Assignment Mens Rea and Actus
Reus NEW
Mens Rea and Actus Reus. Due by Day 7. For this
assignment, examine the concepts of mens rea
and actus reus as outlined in Chapter 2, of the
Peak (2015) text. The Louisiana murder trial of
Yoshihiro Hattori illustrated both actus reus and
mens rea quite vividly. Read the following news
articles detailing the 1992 Halloween killing of
exchange student Yoshihiro Hattori:
Jury Acquits Man Who Shot Japanese Youth:
Crime: Panel Deliberates Only 3 Hours Before
Clearing Louisiana Man. Victim’s Father Will
Push Drive to Limit Availability of Guns in U.S.
COURSE GUIDE
5. Clinton Meets Parents of Slain Japanese Student
Defense Depicts Japanese Boy as ‘Scary’
Japanese Angered by U.S. Acquittal of Student’s
Killer
Focusing on the conceptualization of actus reus
and mens rea,
Describe whether the court acted justly and/or
legally in the acquittal of Rodney Peairs.
Justify your personal opinions by referencing
legal concepts or by building on theories
outlined in the
text.
Your paper must be at least 750 words in length
(excluding title and references pages) and
formatted according to APA style as outlined in
the Ashford Writing Center. Cite your sources in
text and include them on the references page.
For information regarding APA samples and
tutorials, visit the Ashford Writing Center.
6. ASH CRJ 501 Week 2 Journal 4th Amendment
and Cellular Telephone Searches NEW
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.uopassignments.com/crj-501-
ash/crj-501-week-2-journal-4th-
amendment-and-cellular-telephone-
searches-recent
For more classes visit
http://www.uopassignments.com
CRJ 501 Week 2 Journal 4th Amendment and
Cellular Telephone Searches NEW
Week Two Journal: 4th Amendment and Cellular
Telephone Searches. Due by Day 7. Recently, the
U.S. Supreme Court ruled in a 9-0 decision that
law enforcement officers must obtain a search
warrant prior to conducting a search of an
individual's cellular telephone. Failure on the
part of law enforcement officials to obtain the
necessary search warrant would render any
information acquired during such a search
inadmissible in a court of law.
Police organizations contend that searching
suspects’ cell phones is a vital part of the duty to
7. protect officers during the course of an arrest.
Privacy advocates maintain that contents
contained within an individual’s cell phone
should be considered private, similar to a home
or an office.
Analyze the application of the Constitution to the
operational functions of the police. Identify
ethical issues relevant to the Court’s ruling, and
explore such questions as whether arresting
officers might be endangered due to the Court's
ruling. Consider whether the Court’s decision
incapacitates the police as they attempt to
maintain order and arrest criminal perpetrators.
Your journal entry this week should be at least
one page in length.
8. ASH CRJ 501 Week 3 Assignment Police Use of
Force Graham v. Connor (1989) NEW
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.uopassignments.com/crj-501-
ash/crj-501-week-3-assignment-police-use-
of-force-graham-v-connor-recent
For more classes visit
http://www.uopassignments.com
CRJ 501 Week 3 Assignment Police Use of Force
Graham v. Connor (1989) NEW
Police Use of Force. Due by Day 7. The police in
America are the only governmentally sponsored
entity with the authority and power to take the
life of a citizen. Due to this tremendous power,
scholars and community activists have, over the
years, expounded on the need for tight
regulation and control over police and their use
of force against citizens. For this assignment, you
will examine and analyze the various ways police
use of force has been litigated and controlled.
You will select one court case from the list below
and examine the ways the court attempted to
9. place constraints on the police use of physical
force when confronting citizens. First, select one
of the following cases:
Tennessee v. Garner (1985)
Graham v. Connor (1989)
Johnson v. Glick (1973)
In your paper
Provide details of the case selected.
Describe the events and the players’ various
roles.
Describe the outcome.
Provide an analysis of the long-term result or
consequences of the outcome for police.
Explain any operational policies or procedures
that changed as a result of the case.
Explain what the outcome means for ordinary
citizens should they encounter officers during
their daily
routine.
Your paper must be 500 to 750 words in length
(excluding title and references pages) and
formatted according to APA style as outlined in
10. the Ashford Writing Center. Cite your sources in
text and include them on the references page.
For information regarding APA samples and
tutorials, visit the Ashford Writing Center. The
information sources necessary to complete this
assignment can be found in Chapter 7 of the Peak
(2015) text.
11. ASH CRJ 501 Week 3 Assignment Police Use of
Force Tennessee v. Garner (1985) NEW
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.uopassignments.com/crj-501-
ash/crj-501-week-3-assignment-police-use-
of-force-tennessee-v-garner-recent
For more classes visit
http://www.uopassignments.com
CRJ 501 Week 3 Assignment Police Use of Force
Tennessee v. Garner (1985) NEW
Police Use of Force. Due by Day 7. The police in
America are the only governmentally sponsored
entity with the authority and power to take the
life of a citizen. Due to this tremendous power,
scholars and community activists have, over the
years, expounded on the need for tight
regulation and control over police and their use
of force against citizens. For this assignment, you
will examine and analyze the various ways police
use of force has been litigated and controlled.
You will select one court case from the list below
and examine the ways the court attempted to
place constraints on the police use of physical
12. force when confronting citizens. First, select one
of the following cases:
Tennessee v. Garner (1985)
Graham v. Connor (1989)
Johnson v. Glick (1973)
In your paper
Provide details of the case selected.
Describe the events and the players’ various
roles.
Describe the outcome.
Provide an analysis of the long-term result or
consequences of the outcome for police.
Explain any operational policies or procedures
that changed as a result of the case.
Explain what the outcome means for ordinary
citizens should they encounter officers during
their daily
routine.
Your paper must be 500 to 750 words in length
(excluding title and references pages) and
formatted according to APA style as outlined in
the Ashford Writing Center. Cite your sources in
13. text and include them on the references page.
For information regarding APA samples and
tutorials, visit the Ashford Writing Center. The
information sources necessary to complete this
assignment can be found in Chapter 7 of the Peak
(2015) text.
14. ASH CRJ 501 Week 3 Journal NEW
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.uopassignments.com/crj-501-
ash/crj-501-week-3-journal-recent
For more classes visit
http://www.uopassignments.com
CRJ 501 Week 3 Journal NEW
15. ASH CRJ 501 Week 4 Assignment Impact of
Tennessee v. Garner (1985) NEW
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.uopassignments.com/crj-501-
ash/crj-501-week-4-assignment-impact-of-
tennessee-v-garner-recent
For more classes visit
http://www.uopassignments.com
CRJ 501 Week 4 Assignment Impact of Tennessee
v. Garner (1985) NEW
Impact of Tennessee v. Garner (1985). Due by
Day 7. In this assignment, you will focus on the
Supreme Court ruling and aftermath of
Tennessee v. Garner (1985). Scholars have
argued that this one case has had more influence
over the criminal justice system than any other.
Use your Peak (2015) text and the Tennenbaum
(1994) article for information pertaining to the
ramifications of the Court's decision.
In your paper
Summarize the facts that the responding officer,
Hymon, considered in his decision to use deadly
force
16. against Garner.
Explain whether or not you believe the officer
made a reasonable decision, taking into account
the
situational factors.
Describe several of the implications of the
Court’s ruling for police and daily patrol
operations, reflecting on what you learned in
Week Three.
Your paper must be 500 to 750 words in length
(excluding title and references pages) and
formatted according to APA style as outlined in
the Ashford Writing Center. You must use at least
one formal scholarly source. Cite your sources in
text and include them on the references page.
For information regarding APA samples and
tutorials, visit the Ashford Writing Center.
17. ASH CRJ 501 Week 4 Journal Fleeing Felon NEW
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.uopassignments.com/crj-501-
ash/crj-501-week-4-journal-fleeing-felon-
recent
For more classes visit
http://www.uopassignments.com
CRJ 501 Week 4 Journal Fleeing Felon NEW
Week Four Journal: Fleeing Felon. Due by Day 7.
As we have all seen, the Supreme Court's ruling
in Tennessee v. Garner transformed many
aspects of daily operational procedures for law
enforcement. While the decision was extremely
controversial at its inception, as time has worn
on most people, including police officers, have
acknowledged that the Court was correct and
just in its assertion that the use of deadly force
against an unarmed fleeing felon was
unconstitutional.
In the light of recent controversies surrounding
a spate of police shootings of unarmed civilians,
many of the issues pertinent in the Tennessee
ruling have been raised again.
18. In this week’s journal, explore the issue of the
use of deadly force against a fleeing felon. In
your own words, state why you think such a use
of force should be allowed or disallowed by the
courts. Are the police just in using deadly force
against an individual who flees after having
committed (or is suspected of committing) a
felony? Are the police just in using deadly force
against an individual who is suspected of
committing a felony but takes evasive action?
Reflect upon those two questions. Your journal
entry this week should be at least one page in
length.
19. ASH CRJ 501 Week 6 Final Paper Systems Paper
Miranda v. Arizona (1966) NEW
Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
http://www.uopassignments.com/crj-501-
ash/crj-501-week-6-final-paper-systems-
paper-miranda-v-arizona-recent
For more classes visit
http://www.uopassignments.com
CRJ 501 Week 6 Final Paper Systems Paper
Miranda v. Arizona (1966) NEW
Systems Paper. Due by Day 7. The focus of the
Systems Paper will be on the system-wide effects
that various Supreme Court decisions have had,
and continue to have, on the field of criminal
justice. You will select a Supreme Court case
from the list provided below, outline details of
the case and its deposition, and trace the ruling’s
repercussions as the various components of the
criminal justice system are affected. A single
decision has the capacity to greatly alter
criminal justice operating procedures. Some
decisions have important effects, but their ability
to create system-wide changes in policy is
moderate. Other decisions have seemingly
20. mundane outcomes, yet end up causing vast
changes in policy for various components of the
criminal justice system.
First, select one Supreme Court case from the list
below:
Tennessee v. Garner (1985)
Escobedo v. Illinois (1964)
Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
Cooper v. Pate (1964)
Cruz v. Beto (1972)
Furman v. Georgia (1972)
Williams v. Florida (1970)
Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)
Powell v. Alabama (1932)
Harris v. United States (1968)
Terry v. Ohio (1968)
Florida v. Harris (2013)
Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
Weeks v. United States (1914)
Illinois v. Perkins (1990)
21. Using the selected case, in your paper;
Summarize the background and details of the
case and the justices’ ruling.
Identify the specific component of the criminal
justice system that was most affected by the
Supreme
Court’s ruling.
Provide an in-depth analysis of any operational
policy, hiring, or training policy that was, or
would be,
required to change due to the legal decision.
Describe what systemic effect the Supreme
Court’s decision had, or has, for the remaining
components of
the justice system.
Detail how a single Court ruling can have
systemic effects.
Identify and trace system-wide transformation
caused by a particular Court ruling.
Cite quotations taken directly from the original
court case transcripts. Only select one case from
the list upon which to build your paper. Citations
and basic information pertaining to each case
22. can be found in the Peak (2015) text. For more in
depth discussions and original Court
documentation, a FindLaw, Oyez, Google, or Bing
search will elicit a plethora of reputable sources.
Remember, Wikipedia should never be
considered a reputable source of scholarly
information.
The Systems Paper
Must be 12 to 15 double-spaced pages in length
(excluding title and reference pages), and
formatted
according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford
Writing Center.
Must include a title page with the following:
o Title of paper
o Student’s name
o Course name and number oInstructor’sname
o Date submitted
Must
Must
Must
begin with an introductory paragraph that has a
succinct thesis statement. address the topic of
23. the paper with critical thought.
end with a conclusion that reaffirms your thesis.