1) The document discusses the principle of humanitarian intervention as applied to Libya in 2011. It provides background on Libya's poor human rights record under Gaddafi and the origins of the rebellion against his regime.
2) It describes the escalating violence against protesters and threats made by Gaddafi against civilians in Benghazi that prompted the UN to authorize a no-fly zone. Resolution 1973 allowed "all necessary measures" to protect civilians.
3) The intervention is analyzed through the framework of "Responsibility to Protect," marking the first time military force was legitimized by the UN against a sovereign nation for humanitarian protection. However, some argue the intervention went beyond protecting civilians.
The document discusses the 2011 military intervention in Libya that was conducted under the principle of the responsibility to protect (R2P). It explores whether the failure was due to flaws in the operationalization of the intervention or problems with the R2P doctrine itself. The intervention began with the goal of protecting civilians but shifted to a regime change operation, ignoring responsibilities to rebuild. The paper will analyze what went wrong in the operation, consider alternatives, and discuss whether intervention failure was inevitable given structural problems with R2P as a principle.
A path forward for Libya_Gabriele_Masetti_Oct_2015Gabriele Masetti
1) Libya lacks a unified government and is embroiled in conflict between competing authorities in the east and west. The international community is supporting UN-led peace talks, but reconciliation has proved difficult given regional interference and the realities on the ground.
2) The US has interests in preventing further destabilization in North Africa, countering violent extremism in Libya, and securing NATO's southern flank. However, building stability in Libya faces challenges including a weak military tradition and highly divisive issues.
3) The document recommends the US lift the arms embargo on eastern authorities and focus assistance on helping them establish control over eastern Libya as the most promising partner for stability.
International humanitarian law (IHL) applies during armed conflicts and prohibits acts aimed at terrorizing civilians. Even when IHL does not apply, fundamental human rights and humanitarian laws cannot be violated. States must ensure counterterrorism measures comply with international law. The use of force in self-defense is permitted under Article 51 of the UN Charter in response to an armed attack, but the response must be necessary, proportional, and avoid further escalation when possible.
The document discusses the protection of civilians during armed conflict. It notes that civilians now account for most casualties in war. It then outlines various ways to protect civilians, including enhancing compliance with international law, engaging with non-state armed groups, UN peacekeeping missions, and ensuring humanitarian access and accountability. Specific UN Security Council roles and protections for vulnerable groups like women, children, and journalists are also mentioned. The document concludes that international law has evolved to better protect civilians beyond what is stated in the Geneva Conventions.
A surrogate state? The role of UNHCR in the protracted refugee situationsAndy Dabydeen
This document summarizes the roles of different actors in contributing to protracted refugee situations. It discusses how UNHCR has assumed responsibilities like providing shelter, food, and education for refugees when host countries have limited resources. It also examines how industrialized countries have focused on reducing asylum seekers rather than burden sharing. Finally, it analyzes how UNHCR has been constrained by intractable conflicts, policies of other actors, and its own prioritization of issues.
This document discusses the protection of civilians in armed conflict. It notes that civilians now make up the vast majority of casualties in war. The UN Security Council has taken steps to protect civilians, such as authorizing force in Libya in 2011. There are several ways to protect civilians, including ensuring compliance with international law, engaging with non-state armed groups, peacekeeping operations, and humanitarian access. Nine current peacekeeping missions have civilian protection mandates. Both human rights law and international humanitarian law are relevant to protecting civilians. Specific vulnerable groups like women, children, and journalists require special protection efforts.
This document discusses the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). It establishes that UNHCR was created in 1950 to aid refugees and is headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland. The document outlines UNHCR's main tasks like providing protection to refugees and helping find durable solutions. It also discusses the 1951 Refugee Convention which sets minimum standards for refugee treatment and rights. The rights of refugees discussed include protection from persecution, discrimination, and illegal entry penalties as well as rights to work, housing, education, movement, identity documents, and asylum.
Study guide human rights-topic-area-a rotaract global mun 2015Adrian Dan Pop
For centuries, protection has been granted to people who flee persecution. However, the
current refugee regime seems to be the product of the last fifty years of the 20th century. The
origins of the modern refugee law can be found in the aftermath of the World World II, due to the
refugee crisis of the precedent years.n refugee regime is largely the product of the second half of
the twentieth century.
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (hereinafter: UDHR) guarantees the right to
seek and enjoy asylum in other countries. Other human rights instruments 1 have also guaranteed
the “right to seek and be granted asylum in a foreign territory, in accordance with the legislation
of the state and international conventions.”2
The document discusses the 2011 military intervention in Libya that was conducted under the principle of the responsibility to protect (R2P). It explores whether the failure was due to flaws in the operationalization of the intervention or problems with the R2P doctrine itself. The intervention began with the goal of protecting civilians but shifted to a regime change operation, ignoring responsibilities to rebuild. The paper will analyze what went wrong in the operation, consider alternatives, and discuss whether intervention failure was inevitable given structural problems with R2P as a principle.
A path forward for Libya_Gabriele_Masetti_Oct_2015Gabriele Masetti
1) Libya lacks a unified government and is embroiled in conflict between competing authorities in the east and west. The international community is supporting UN-led peace talks, but reconciliation has proved difficult given regional interference and the realities on the ground.
2) The US has interests in preventing further destabilization in North Africa, countering violent extremism in Libya, and securing NATO's southern flank. However, building stability in Libya faces challenges including a weak military tradition and highly divisive issues.
3) The document recommends the US lift the arms embargo on eastern authorities and focus assistance on helping them establish control over eastern Libya as the most promising partner for stability.
International humanitarian law (IHL) applies during armed conflicts and prohibits acts aimed at terrorizing civilians. Even when IHL does not apply, fundamental human rights and humanitarian laws cannot be violated. States must ensure counterterrorism measures comply with international law. The use of force in self-defense is permitted under Article 51 of the UN Charter in response to an armed attack, but the response must be necessary, proportional, and avoid further escalation when possible.
The document discusses the protection of civilians during armed conflict. It notes that civilians now account for most casualties in war. It then outlines various ways to protect civilians, including enhancing compliance with international law, engaging with non-state armed groups, UN peacekeeping missions, and ensuring humanitarian access and accountability. Specific UN Security Council roles and protections for vulnerable groups like women, children, and journalists are also mentioned. The document concludes that international law has evolved to better protect civilians beyond what is stated in the Geneva Conventions.
A surrogate state? The role of UNHCR in the protracted refugee situationsAndy Dabydeen
This document summarizes the roles of different actors in contributing to protracted refugee situations. It discusses how UNHCR has assumed responsibilities like providing shelter, food, and education for refugees when host countries have limited resources. It also examines how industrialized countries have focused on reducing asylum seekers rather than burden sharing. Finally, it analyzes how UNHCR has been constrained by intractable conflicts, policies of other actors, and its own prioritization of issues.
This document discusses the protection of civilians in armed conflict. It notes that civilians now make up the vast majority of casualties in war. The UN Security Council has taken steps to protect civilians, such as authorizing force in Libya in 2011. There are several ways to protect civilians, including ensuring compliance with international law, engaging with non-state armed groups, peacekeeping operations, and humanitarian access. Nine current peacekeeping missions have civilian protection mandates. Both human rights law and international humanitarian law are relevant to protecting civilians. Specific vulnerable groups like women, children, and journalists require special protection efforts.
This document discusses the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). It establishes that UNHCR was created in 1950 to aid refugees and is headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland. The document outlines UNHCR's main tasks like providing protection to refugees and helping find durable solutions. It also discusses the 1951 Refugee Convention which sets minimum standards for refugee treatment and rights. The rights of refugees discussed include protection from persecution, discrimination, and illegal entry penalties as well as rights to work, housing, education, movement, identity documents, and asylum.
Study guide human rights-topic-area-a rotaract global mun 2015Adrian Dan Pop
For centuries, protection has been granted to people who flee persecution. However, the
current refugee regime seems to be the product of the last fifty years of the 20th century. The
origins of the modern refugee law can be found in the aftermath of the World World II, due to the
refugee crisis of the precedent years.n refugee regime is largely the product of the second half of
the twentieth century.
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (hereinafter: UDHR) guarantees the right to
seek and enjoy asylum in other countries. Other human rights instruments 1 have also guaranteed
the “right to seek and be granted asylum in a foreign territory, in accordance with the legislation
of the state and international conventions.”2
The Muslim world is now a world of conflict and forced migrants (Dar al harb wa al muhajirun). Asylum and “refuge-seeking” are two important themes in Islamic history.
Islamic theory and teachings relating to refugees and forced displacement are known as hijrah law. It is quite different from modern refugee law. It arguably gives more protection to asylum-seekers and refugees (mustaminun). However, hijrah law is rarely referred to or invoked today. If they were taken into consideration, it could contribute greatly to the protection of the forcibly displaced. It might also reduce the numerous problems refugees all over the globe are facing.
International Humanitarian Law governs armed conflicts to minimize suffering. During the Vietnam War (1955-1975), the conflict evolved from an internal struggle to an international war. While the Geneva Conventions applied, violations may have occurred such as the My Lai Massacre where U.S. soldiers killed civilians. Other controversial actions included the use of Agent Orange to defoliate jungles, which left health issues for Vietnamese. The war ended in 1975 with North Vietnam defeating South Vietnam and reuniting the country.
The protection of civilians within un pso oct 14ferry arifin
This document provides an introduction to protection of civilians (POC) training for UN peacekeepers. It outlines key learning objectives around explaining the importance of POC, describing threats to civilians, and identifying legal obligations. It also summarizes different approaches to protection, threats faced by civilians, actors responsible for protection, and consequences of failing to protect civilians. The document aims to equip peacekeepers with knowledge on POC mandates, authorities, and prohibitions to guide their conduct in operations.
This document provides an outline and objectives for analyzing key concepts relating to international humanitarian law (IHL) and international criminal law (ICL). It discusses the interlinkages between public international law, international human rights law, IHL, and ICL. The document outlines the history and emergence of IHL and ICL, their key legal instruments and sources. It analyzes the application of ICL and categories of international crimes such as war crimes and crimes against humanity. The connection between IHL and ICL is also discussed, particularly how violations of IHL can constitute war crimes under ICL.
International Humanitarian Law Lecture 19 - 70 Years of Geneva ConventionsNilendra Kumar
Geneva Conventions are the main plank of IHL treaty law adopted by India to abide by protection, compliance and adherence norms in armed conflicts
This presentation is a review of past 70 years resume in it's regard.
An overview of the definition of refugees, similar terms and international legal regime concerning refugee laws, with special focus on the problem under Indian perspective.
International humanitarian law presentationRida Khan
International Humanitarian Law (IHL) regulates the conduct of armed conflicts and seeks to limit human suffering. It originated in the 19th century and is now comprised of the Geneva Conventions and additional protocols that protect civilians, prisoners of war, and others not participating in hostilities. IHL applies in both international and non-international armed conflicts and restricts certain weapons and tactics while providing humanitarian protections and oversight of compliance.
The document discusses the definition of piracy under Article 101 of the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). It argues the definition is too narrow and does not account for modern forms of maritime violence. The definition requires acts be committed for private ends, from one private ship to another, and on the high seas. This excludes many historical acts of piracy and limits enforcement. The document examines alternative frameworks under the 1988 SUA Convention but notes its limitations. It concludes a new framework is needed to define piracy more broadly and establish clear responsibilities for addressing modern maritime crimes.
The document discusses the definitions and sources of international humanitarian law (IHL), also known as the laws of war. It explains that IHL aims to limit suffering and protect civilians during armed conflicts by establishing rules for combatants and military objectives. The main sources of IHL are lawmaking treaties like the Geneva and Hague Conventions, as well as customary international law. The document outlines the key purposes and applicability of IHL, and consequences for violating its provisions.
ISAS Working Paper No. 229 - An Assessment of the International Legal Obligat...Ramandeep Kaur
This paper analyzes the international legal obligations owed to Rohingya refugees by Bangladesh, Thailand, Malaysia, and Indonesia - countries that have received Rohingya migration flows. These countries have not always complied fully with their obligations to rescue boats in distress, determine refugee status fairly, and grant temporary asylum. However, international pressure following the discovery of mass graves pushed countries to take collaborative action through a joint task force. While this new cooperation aligns more with international law, the paper argues compliance may be short-lived without durable solutions, as international law alone cannot comprehensively address this complex problem.
The document provides an overview of several key issues relating to world order:
1. The Responsibility to Protect norm which challenges the concept of state sovereignty by holding states responsible for protecting human rights and allowing international intervention when they fail.
2. Regional and global security threats like nuclear weapons which some states still possess despite treaties aiming to reduce them.
3. Examples of both successful and unsuccessful achievements of world order through international courts and treaties, using cases like East Timor and Libya.
4. International Humanitarian Law and the Geneva Conventions which regulate conduct during war but have been breached at times, such as by the United States in the Iraq war.
Historically, international humanitarian law (IHL) through the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and their Additional Protocols of 1977 has required the protection of civilian populations in armed conflict. The Geneva Conventions provide guidance with regard to the obligations of states and parties to a conflict to apply the principle of distinction and to ensure precaution in attack as they pursue their military objectives. This was the first international legal framework to provide for the protection of civilians and forms the foundation of the ‘Protection of Civilians’ concept.
Throughout the 1990s, devastating failures to protect civilians from violence and atrocities shaped thinking at the United Nations (UN) and gave rise to a more expansive concept of Protection of Civilians, incorporating international human rights law, international refugee law, and including best practices in peacekeeping operations and humanitarian response. This is reflected in the adoption of Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict as a thematic concern of the UN Security Council, and the development of policy and guidance relating to civilian protection since 1999, at the United Nations and elsewhere. The term ‘Protection of Civilians’ has expanded from a set of legal obligations in IHL to a conceptual and operational framework used by multiple ‘protection actors’ and practitioners—military and civilian, political and humanitarian.
The concept of Protection of Civilians has developed in response to conflicts and crises as they emerged and as a result has developed unevenly. Combined with the fact that there is no operational definition of Protection of Civilians, there is a perception among protection practitioners that different actors involved in providing protection to people caught up in crisis understand and implement the concept differently. This perception raised questions among the researchers as to whether different understandings actually exist, and if so what the implications for the implementation of civilian protection might be. This gave rise to a research project titled In Search of Common Ground – Understanding Civilian Protection Language and Practice for Civil and Military Practitioners.
International Humanitarian Law Debate Championship 2016Terence Aaron
These are the motion, context and information slides for the International Humanitarian Law Debate Championship 2016.
Adjudication Core: Banun Sabri (IIUM/International Islamic University of Malaysia), Terence Aaron (UT MARA/University of Technology MARA) and Leeroy Ting Kah Sing (UM/ University of Malaya)
Dates: 9-11 December
If you have any questions on the slides, feel free to forward
Intro to international humanitarian law by icrcTabi Khan
International Humanitarian Law (IHL), also known as the Law of Armed Conflict, regulates armed conflict by limiting means and methods of warfare and limiting suffering. IHL protects civilians and those who are wounded, captured or detained. It originated from ancient customs and was modernized in the 1860s by Henry Dunant, who established the International Committee of the Red Cross and promoted the Geneva Conventions protecting wounded soldiers. The four 1949 Geneva Conventions and two 1977 Additional Protocols apply to international and non-international armed conflicts. IHL principles include distinction, proportionality, unnecessary suffering and military necessity. All parties in conflict, including non-state actors, must respect IHL.
This document summarizes international humanitarian law (IHL), including its sources in customary international law and treaties like the Hague and Geneva Conventions. It describes the key principles of IHL like distinction, proportionality, and military necessity. It discusses the different types of armed conflicts and protected persons under IHL such as civilians, prisoners of war, and the wounded. It also outlines prohibitions on means and methods of warfare and the application of IHL to non-international armed conflicts.
Rights of Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons with a special reference ...inventionjournals
International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention (IJHSSI) is an international journal intended for professionals and researchers in all fields of Humanities and Social Science. IJHSSI publishes research articles and reviews within the whole field Humanities and Social Science, new teaching methods, assessment, validation and the impact of new technologies and it will continue to provide information on the latest trends and developments in this ever-expanding subject. The publications of papers are selected through double peer reviewed to ensure originality, relevance, and readability. The articles published in our journal can be accessed online.
The document summarizes the events of the Libyan revolution from 2010-2012. It describes how protests began in Benghazi in 2011 as part of the Arab Spring, spreading across Libya against dictator Muammar Gaddafi's 42-year rule. NATO intervened with airstrikes to support rebels as the conflict escalated. Rebels gained control of Tripoli in August 2011 after six months and Gaddafi was killed in October 2011, declaring Libya liberated. However, tensions and violence continued in the following years as Libya transitioned to a new government.
The document provides an overview of international humanitarian law (IHL) and human rights. It discusses how IHL establishes conduct rules for countries during war to limit means and methods of war and protect non-combatants. It also discusses the origins and development of IHL through treaties like the Geneva Conventions. The document notes both IHL and human rights aim to restrain government power but apply in different ways and circumstances. It provides examples of key IHL principles like distinction, proportionality, and precautions in attack.
now a days i researching about new means and method of warfare with taking and observing the international experts opinions and analysis, as this world is achieving and inventing more effective and dangerous weapon and way of projectile these new weapon which becoming the serious threat to human life, not just human but these new full of technology weapon and methods are enough to destroy entire world .
The document discusses the 2011 Libyan civil war and revolution that overthrew the government of Muammar Gaddafi. It provides background on the protests against Gaddafi's government, the formation of the opposition National Transitional Council, and the impact of the conflict on Libya's economy and society. It also examines issues like human rights abuses during the war, challenges in rebuilding Libya, and calls to the NTC to uphold the rule of law and prevent further violence.
AUSISTest_NSDM Take Home (10 Jun 2011)_Jeff HoffmannJeff Hoffmann
1. The document discusses the situation in Libya in 2011 during the civil war and international intervention. It provides background on Libya's history under Gaddafi's rule and assessments of Libya as a threat. It also discusses debates around the international coalition's goals and strategies in Libya.
2. The document analyzes US and international policy towards Libya over decades, from economic sanctions in the 1980s to normalization of relations in the 2000s. It notes Libya's shifting status from threat to partner and back again following the 2011 uprising.
3. Views are presented on the effectiveness and goals of the international coalition in Libya. While their decision-making is criticized as vague, regime change appears to be an aim in order to weaken Gaddafi
The Muslim world is now a world of conflict and forced migrants (Dar al harb wa al muhajirun). Asylum and “refuge-seeking” are two important themes in Islamic history.
Islamic theory and teachings relating to refugees and forced displacement are known as hijrah law. It is quite different from modern refugee law. It arguably gives more protection to asylum-seekers and refugees (mustaminun). However, hijrah law is rarely referred to or invoked today. If they were taken into consideration, it could contribute greatly to the protection of the forcibly displaced. It might also reduce the numerous problems refugees all over the globe are facing.
International Humanitarian Law governs armed conflicts to minimize suffering. During the Vietnam War (1955-1975), the conflict evolved from an internal struggle to an international war. While the Geneva Conventions applied, violations may have occurred such as the My Lai Massacre where U.S. soldiers killed civilians. Other controversial actions included the use of Agent Orange to defoliate jungles, which left health issues for Vietnamese. The war ended in 1975 with North Vietnam defeating South Vietnam and reuniting the country.
The protection of civilians within un pso oct 14ferry arifin
This document provides an introduction to protection of civilians (POC) training for UN peacekeepers. It outlines key learning objectives around explaining the importance of POC, describing threats to civilians, and identifying legal obligations. It also summarizes different approaches to protection, threats faced by civilians, actors responsible for protection, and consequences of failing to protect civilians. The document aims to equip peacekeepers with knowledge on POC mandates, authorities, and prohibitions to guide their conduct in operations.
This document provides an outline and objectives for analyzing key concepts relating to international humanitarian law (IHL) and international criminal law (ICL). It discusses the interlinkages between public international law, international human rights law, IHL, and ICL. The document outlines the history and emergence of IHL and ICL, their key legal instruments and sources. It analyzes the application of ICL and categories of international crimes such as war crimes and crimes against humanity. The connection between IHL and ICL is also discussed, particularly how violations of IHL can constitute war crimes under ICL.
International Humanitarian Law Lecture 19 - 70 Years of Geneva ConventionsNilendra Kumar
Geneva Conventions are the main plank of IHL treaty law adopted by India to abide by protection, compliance and adherence norms in armed conflicts
This presentation is a review of past 70 years resume in it's regard.
An overview of the definition of refugees, similar terms and international legal regime concerning refugee laws, with special focus on the problem under Indian perspective.
International humanitarian law presentationRida Khan
International Humanitarian Law (IHL) regulates the conduct of armed conflicts and seeks to limit human suffering. It originated in the 19th century and is now comprised of the Geneva Conventions and additional protocols that protect civilians, prisoners of war, and others not participating in hostilities. IHL applies in both international and non-international armed conflicts and restricts certain weapons and tactics while providing humanitarian protections and oversight of compliance.
The document discusses the definition of piracy under Article 101 of the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). It argues the definition is too narrow and does not account for modern forms of maritime violence. The definition requires acts be committed for private ends, from one private ship to another, and on the high seas. This excludes many historical acts of piracy and limits enforcement. The document examines alternative frameworks under the 1988 SUA Convention but notes its limitations. It concludes a new framework is needed to define piracy more broadly and establish clear responsibilities for addressing modern maritime crimes.
The document discusses the definitions and sources of international humanitarian law (IHL), also known as the laws of war. It explains that IHL aims to limit suffering and protect civilians during armed conflicts by establishing rules for combatants and military objectives. The main sources of IHL are lawmaking treaties like the Geneva and Hague Conventions, as well as customary international law. The document outlines the key purposes and applicability of IHL, and consequences for violating its provisions.
ISAS Working Paper No. 229 - An Assessment of the International Legal Obligat...Ramandeep Kaur
This paper analyzes the international legal obligations owed to Rohingya refugees by Bangladesh, Thailand, Malaysia, and Indonesia - countries that have received Rohingya migration flows. These countries have not always complied fully with their obligations to rescue boats in distress, determine refugee status fairly, and grant temporary asylum. However, international pressure following the discovery of mass graves pushed countries to take collaborative action through a joint task force. While this new cooperation aligns more with international law, the paper argues compliance may be short-lived without durable solutions, as international law alone cannot comprehensively address this complex problem.
The document provides an overview of several key issues relating to world order:
1. The Responsibility to Protect norm which challenges the concept of state sovereignty by holding states responsible for protecting human rights and allowing international intervention when they fail.
2. Regional and global security threats like nuclear weapons which some states still possess despite treaties aiming to reduce them.
3. Examples of both successful and unsuccessful achievements of world order through international courts and treaties, using cases like East Timor and Libya.
4. International Humanitarian Law and the Geneva Conventions which regulate conduct during war but have been breached at times, such as by the United States in the Iraq war.
Historically, international humanitarian law (IHL) through the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and their Additional Protocols of 1977 has required the protection of civilian populations in armed conflict. The Geneva Conventions provide guidance with regard to the obligations of states and parties to a conflict to apply the principle of distinction and to ensure precaution in attack as they pursue their military objectives. This was the first international legal framework to provide for the protection of civilians and forms the foundation of the ‘Protection of Civilians’ concept.
Throughout the 1990s, devastating failures to protect civilians from violence and atrocities shaped thinking at the United Nations (UN) and gave rise to a more expansive concept of Protection of Civilians, incorporating international human rights law, international refugee law, and including best practices in peacekeeping operations and humanitarian response. This is reflected in the adoption of Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict as a thematic concern of the UN Security Council, and the development of policy and guidance relating to civilian protection since 1999, at the United Nations and elsewhere. The term ‘Protection of Civilians’ has expanded from a set of legal obligations in IHL to a conceptual and operational framework used by multiple ‘protection actors’ and practitioners—military and civilian, political and humanitarian.
The concept of Protection of Civilians has developed in response to conflicts and crises as they emerged and as a result has developed unevenly. Combined with the fact that there is no operational definition of Protection of Civilians, there is a perception among protection practitioners that different actors involved in providing protection to people caught up in crisis understand and implement the concept differently. This perception raised questions among the researchers as to whether different understandings actually exist, and if so what the implications for the implementation of civilian protection might be. This gave rise to a research project titled In Search of Common Ground – Understanding Civilian Protection Language and Practice for Civil and Military Practitioners.
International Humanitarian Law Debate Championship 2016Terence Aaron
These are the motion, context and information slides for the International Humanitarian Law Debate Championship 2016.
Adjudication Core: Banun Sabri (IIUM/International Islamic University of Malaysia), Terence Aaron (UT MARA/University of Technology MARA) and Leeroy Ting Kah Sing (UM/ University of Malaya)
Dates: 9-11 December
If you have any questions on the slides, feel free to forward
Intro to international humanitarian law by icrcTabi Khan
International Humanitarian Law (IHL), also known as the Law of Armed Conflict, regulates armed conflict by limiting means and methods of warfare and limiting suffering. IHL protects civilians and those who are wounded, captured or detained. It originated from ancient customs and was modernized in the 1860s by Henry Dunant, who established the International Committee of the Red Cross and promoted the Geneva Conventions protecting wounded soldiers. The four 1949 Geneva Conventions and two 1977 Additional Protocols apply to international and non-international armed conflicts. IHL principles include distinction, proportionality, unnecessary suffering and military necessity. All parties in conflict, including non-state actors, must respect IHL.
This document summarizes international humanitarian law (IHL), including its sources in customary international law and treaties like the Hague and Geneva Conventions. It describes the key principles of IHL like distinction, proportionality, and military necessity. It discusses the different types of armed conflicts and protected persons under IHL such as civilians, prisoners of war, and the wounded. It also outlines prohibitions on means and methods of warfare and the application of IHL to non-international armed conflicts.
Rights of Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons with a special reference ...inventionjournals
International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention (IJHSSI) is an international journal intended for professionals and researchers in all fields of Humanities and Social Science. IJHSSI publishes research articles and reviews within the whole field Humanities and Social Science, new teaching methods, assessment, validation and the impact of new technologies and it will continue to provide information on the latest trends and developments in this ever-expanding subject. The publications of papers are selected through double peer reviewed to ensure originality, relevance, and readability. The articles published in our journal can be accessed online.
The document summarizes the events of the Libyan revolution from 2010-2012. It describes how protests began in Benghazi in 2011 as part of the Arab Spring, spreading across Libya against dictator Muammar Gaddafi's 42-year rule. NATO intervened with airstrikes to support rebels as the conflict escalated. Rebels gained control of Tripoli in August 2011 after six months and Gaddafi was killed in October 2011, declaring Libya liberated. However, tensions and violence continued in the following years as Libya transitioned to a new government.
The document provides an overview of international humanitarian law (IHL) and human rights. It discusses how IHL establishes conduct rules for countries during war to limit means and methods of war and protect non-combatants. It also discusses the origins and development of IHL through treaties like the Geneva Conventions. The document notes both IHL and human rights aim to restrain government power but apply in different ways and circumstances. It provides examples of key IHL principles like distinction, proportionality, and precautions in attack.
now a days i researching about new means and method of warfare with taking and observing the international experts opinions and analysis, as this world is achieving and inventing more effective and dangerous weapon and way of projectile these new weapon which becoming the serious threat to human life, not just human but these new full of technology weapon and methods are enough to destroy entire world .
The document discusses the 2011 Libyan civil war and revolution that overthrew the government of Muammar Gaddafi. It provides background on the protests against Gaddafi's government, the formation of the opposition National Transitional Council, and the impact of the conflict on Libya's economy and society. It also examines issues like human rights abuses during the war, challenges in rebuilding Libya, and calls to the NTC to uphold the rule of law and prevent further violence.
AUSISTest_NSDM Take Home (10 Jun 2011)_Jeff HoffmannJeff Hoffmann
1. The document discusses the situation in Libya in 2011 during the civil war and international intervention. It provides background on Libya's history under Gaddafi's rule and assessments of Libya as a threat. It also discusses debates around the international coalition's goals and strategies in Libya.
2. The document analyzes US and international policy towards Libya over decades, from economic sanctions in the 1980s to normalization of relations in the 2000s. It notes Libya's shifting status from threat to partner and back again following the 2011 uprising.
3. Views are presented on the effectiveness and goals of the international coalition in Libya. While their decision-making is criticized as vague, regime change appears to be an aim in order to weaken Gaddafi
Seek4media: There is a Strong Moral Case for the End of Muammar Ghaddafi's 42...Seek4media
As jubilant crowds machine-gun the sky in Tripoli's Green Square, and forces formerly loyal to a tyrant evaporate into the North African heat, the conflict in Libya looks to have reached the end for which it was always, inevitably, bound.
This document provides background on Libya's descent into a failed state following its 2011 revolution. It describes the divisions in Libya along ideological, regional and tribal lines that have led to ongoing conflict. It notes that Libya initially showed signs of progress after the revolution, with political and economic development as well as integration of former rebels. However, armed militias increasingly exerted influence and undermined state authority. Competing governments now control parts of Libya, the country is divided, and terrorist groups have gained a foothold. Outside powers have also intervened militially while supporting opposing factions. As a result, Libya meets the criteria of a failed state with no central authority over its territory or monopoly on the use of force.
Unity, Betrayal and Failed States in Modern TimeDr. Dan EKONGWE
Since the September 11 terrorist attack in New York, USA, the spread of terrorism is a marked challenge to many governments especially in the developing world. As a follow up to its hegemonic agenda the US pressed on exporting a democratic agenda using several different tools of implementation and the war on terror was a unique tool. This agenda has led to a multiplication of terror groups rather than diminish them...as a result most countries in Africa who already had problems of good governance, under develoment and insecurity have been caught up with increasing wars of identity and fragmentation of states. In west Africa, Central Africa and East Africa national unity constructed after theese countries gained independence on ethno/cultural and religious balance are fading on the basis of identity politics and fanned by foreign legion. Betrayal has become a watch word on local community leaders against regimes in place and former colonial authorities like France. The UN has resorted to implementing the principle of Responsibility to protect (R2P) those they classify as vulnerable.
Unity, Betrayal and Failed States in Modern TimesDr. Dan EKONGWE
The politics of identity and wars of fragmentation of states stern from broken promises by political leaders and state authorities to respect the convenants reached by founding fathers of most modern states thereby leading to increasing ethno/cultural nationalism and wars of identity. We have seen these across the literature from former Yugoslavia and Czechoslovakia, Rwanda, Sudan, Cameroon, Togo, Ghana, Central African Republic, Zimbabwe, Nigeria and Ivory Coast.. The application of the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in its pre UN non approval in Europe to the post application by UN in Lybia has given us the reason to believe that sustainable peace in each state must respect the foundation doctrine of which each country was created, else Africa in particular will continue to witnessed endless wars in age when drone technology and assymetric warfare has gained currency.
The League of Nations was formed after World War 1 to promote peace but failed to prevent World War 2. The United Nations was then established with the aims of maintaining international peace and security through peaceful dispute resolution and promoting human rights. Protests first began in Northern Africa like Tunisia and Egypt due to issues of unemployment and poverty, with some citizens setting themselves on fire, and spread to Libya against Colonel Gaddafi. NATO is discussing military options in Libya, like a no-fly zone, while the UN condemned Gaddafi's actions against his own people and many parts of Libya are now out of his control.
The document discusses international intervention in the Sierra Leone civil war from 1991 to 2002. It analyzes the various attempts at intervention, including: coercive intervention by ECOMOG which was ineffective; mercenary intervention by Executive Outcomes which succeeded militarily but was controversial; UN monitoring and peacekeeping missions which struggled due to lack of resources and clashes with ECOMOG; and unilateral British intervention which successfully rescued hostages and helped end the war by enforcing a diamond embargo. Ultimately, the document argues that international intervention was crucial and effective in ending the conflict, though the UN and ECOMOG interventions faced significant challenges and could have been improved.
O'Bannon.Conflict Analysis in CDI final versionBrett O'Bannon
This document provides a summary of the complex conflict in Côte d'Ivoire, which has local, national, and regional dimensions. Locally, disputes over land, resources, and identity have intensified and sometimes erupted into violence. Nationally, there are struggles for control of the neopatrimonial state that first turned violent in 2000 and led to civil war in 2002, dividing the country. Regionally, the conflicts implicate neighboring states like Burkina Faso, Liberia, Ghana, and Mali. The conflict has roots in colonial policies, economic crises, and disputes over citizenship and political power that marginalized northern groups. Despite peace agreements, tensions remain high due to the persistence of these
The document discusses the Exploring Humanitarian Law (EHL) curriculum. It provides an overview of EHL, including that it consists of 30 hours of classroom activities using primary sources to teach about humanitarian issues in armed conflict. It describes the key concepts and modules covered in EHL, including human dignity, obstacles to humanitarian behavior, limits in armed conflict, violations of international humanitarian law, and responding to the consequences of war. It encourages educators to use EHL materials in their classrooms and provides contact information to learn more.
Power Point Presentation on Red Cross Exploring Humanitarian Law Curriculum by Rosemary Blanchard (College of Ed., CSUS) and Tanya Milelli (No. NV Chapter of Red Cross)
The Responsibility to Protect Doctrine Expectations and Realityijtsrd
Protection of citizens from violence and aggression is one of the basic responsibilities of a sovereign country. But sometimes states fail to comply with this responsibility. The Responsibility to Protect R2P is a commitment which was adopted by the members of United Nations UN in 2005. This doctrine aims at addressing four types of crimes genocide, ethnic cleansing, war crimes and crimes against humanity. The R2P was adopted with a lot of expectations but the performance of the R2P has faced criticisms over the years. Mahfujur Rahman | Md. Saifullah Akon "The Responsibility to Protect Doctrine: Expectations and Reality" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-4 | Issue-3 , April 2020, URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd30314.pdf Paper Url :https://www.ijtsrd.com/humanities-and-the-arts/political-science/30314/the-responsibility-to-protect-doctrine-expectations-and-reality/mahfujur-rahman
The Arab Spring began in 2010 as a wave of protests and uprisings across North Africa and the Middle East. It started in Tunisia when a fruit seller set himself on fire after police confiscated his goods, sparking anger against the corrupt government. This led to protests that spread online and grew large enough to overthrow the Tunisian president. Inspired by Tunisia's success, protests erupted in Egypt in 2011 and eventually led to the resignation of Hosni Mubarak after 18 days. As the Arab Spring continued, other countries like Libya faced growing protests, with Gaddafi launching a violent crackdown until the UN authorized international intervention against his forces. The UN sought to promote peace, rights, and development in response, but faced challenges interven
The Arab Spring began in December 2010 as a wave of protests and uprisings across North Africa and the Middle East. It was sparked by the self-immolation of Tunisian street vendor Mohammed Bouazizi in protest of police corruption and economic hardship. His act inspired protests in Tunisia that overthrew the long-time authoritarian president Zine El Abidine Ben Ali in January 2011 and spread regionally. Inspired by Tunisia's success, massive protests erupted in Egypt and eventually led to the resignation of Hosni Mubarak in February 2011 after 18 days of demonstrations. As the Arab Spring spread, other countries like Libya and Yemen also experienced uprisings, civil wars, and regime changes. The United Nations worked
The Arab Spring:Did the UN achieve their goals?rappercat11
The Arab Spring began in December 2010 in Tunisia as a result of a fruit seller's self-immolation in protest of police corruption. Widespread protests and riots erupted and eventually toppled the Tunisian president. Inspired by Tunisia's success, protests broke out in Egypt in January 2011 and grew to millions demanding President Mubarak's resignation. Though Mubarak made concessions, he ultimately stepped down. Other nations like Libya and Yemen also experienced uprisings, though in Libya it led to civil war between forces loyal to Gaddafi and rebel fighters. The UN sought to promote peace, security, human rights and development in response to the Arab Spring uprisings.
8 pivotal foreign aid moments in post-Gadhafi LibyaDevex
Since the downfall of Moammar Gadhafi‘s 42-year rule in October 2011, engagement by the global development community has increased, though it has been bumpy.
Here are 8 pivotal foreign aid moments in post-Gadhafi Libya.
FMO has adopted the definition of ‘forced migration’ promoted by the International Association for the Study of Forced Migration (IASFM) which describes it as ‘a general term that refers to the movements of refugees and internally displaced people (those displaced by conflicts) as well as people displaced by natural or environmental disasters, chemical or nuclear disasters, famine, or development projects.’ FMO views forced migration as a complex, wide-ranging and pervasive set of phenomena. The study of forced migration is multidisciplinary, international, and multisectoral, incorporating academic, practitioner, agency and local perspectives. FMO focuses on three separate, although sometimes simultaneous and inter-related, types of forced migration. These three types are categorized according to their causal factors: conflict, development policies and projects, and disasters.
Similar to Critically assess the principle of humanitarian intervention as applied to Libya (18)
Critically assess the principle of humanitarian intervention as applied to Libya
1. Q4. Critically assess the principle of humanitarian
intervention as applied to Libya??
By: Eoin Guerin
Module No: SOCM031
Module: America After 9/11
Word Count:2,492
2. Introduction
The ethics behind humanitarian interventions in terms of international relations is highly debated
and contentious. Many academics have argued the merits of humanitarian intervention. Jacques
Ranciere has analysed the merits of humanitarian intervention and compared it to a form of new
imperialism which does not benefit those whose rights are supposedly being intervened on behalf of.
Ranciere (2004) states that the right to humanitarian interference has become “a right that some
nations assume to the supposed benefit of victimized populations, and very often against the advice
of humanitarian organizations themselves”.
Slavoj Zizek argues that human rights are projected onto people whose rights are infringed upon as a
method of not having to engage or consult with them at a personal level. They become faceless
victims of human right abuses which allows Western powers to intervene politically, economically
and militarily to defend their human rights. In this way, those suffering from human rights abuses
have no voice therefore real change specific to the needs of the affected population are ignored
Libya And Human Rights
Prior to the escalation of the crisis and the rebellion against Qadhafi, Libya historically had a poor
human rights record. The state was perceived as having a heavy influence on the judiciary thus there
was little of chance of defendants receiving a fair trial. Ethnic minorities were discriminated against,
there was a high level of religious intolerance and freedom of the press was limited. The Federal
Research Division (2005) stated that “Some of the numerous and serious abuses on the part of the
government include poor prison conditions, arbitrary arrest and detention, prisoners held
incommunicado, and political prisoners held for many years without charge or trial”.
Origins Of Revolt
The origins of revolt in Libya can be said to have developed from the wave of political protests and
subsequent regime changes in some cases that enveloped the Arab World in the early months of
2011. Historically Libya has been made up of a complex network of tribes and these tribes have
played a central role in politics and social relations within Libyan Society. Qadhafi had operated
these tribal complexities with a carrot and stick policy. Those tribes who were loyal to him were
showered with wealth and high social positioning and political influence. This created a system
whereby ordinary Libyans were reliant on the Tribal system to gain prestige and social standing.
The Libyan parliament passed a ‘code of honour’ system in 1997 which further tightened the
governments grip on tribes and clans. This gave Qadhafi and the government the power to revoke
government services as a form of punishment against clans who were not subservient or deemed
disloyal to the regime. This led to growing resentment among certain tribal clans and while the Arab
Spring definitely served as a pretext to the unrest that ensued in the early days of the revolution in
Libya, undoubtedly the code of honour system and clan favouritism pursued by Qadhafi played a
major part also. Mokhefi (2011) states that “The most marginalised tribes are found in the eastern
part of Libya, where the most important oil resources are located, and where political authority
passed out of Gaddafi’s hands in the recent uprising”.
3. The Case for Intervention
The Uprising began in Benghazi on the 15th
February 2011 following the arrest of a human rights
activist in the city. Protests initially were peaceful by nature and called for social improvements
along with further political rights. However these marches became increasingly violent and were
met with violence by loyalist forces. Growing resentment to the violent confrontation meted out by
Qadhafis loyalists led many politicians and those within the military to defect. The rebels under the
title under the Interim Transitional National Council were quick to gain control of a number of key
areas such as Tobruk and Benghazi however many towns continued to swap hands between rebels
and regime forces in the early months of the revolution..There was the imminent threat of mass
civilian deaths in Benghazi after threats made by Qadhafi to this effect. Al Jazeera(2011) and several
other news outlets reported that Qadhafi in a speech said "You all go out and cleanse the city of
Benghazi” threatening the lives and safety of the cities citizens. In the face of such a threat the
United Nations was forced to act.
Hasler 2012 states that “The UN Security Council passed an initial resolution on 26 February that
condemned the violence, imposed a series of international sanctions on Libya and on Qadhafi and
his family and referred Libya’s crackdown on rebels to the International Criminal Court”. Under
Resolution 1970 Libya was also placed under an arms embargo. However the manner in which
Resolution 1970 was adopted must be questioned. The Libyan Issue was not brought to the security
council’s attention by the arab league or by another member nation of the Security Council. It was
brought to the fore by a former representative of Libya who had resigned from his position as Libya
Charge d’Affaires at the United Nations one week earlier. And within one week despite having no
legitimacy to speak at the United Nations, had enacted a process which led to the adoption of
Security Resolution 1970 (Hauben, 2011).
The actions of the Security Council in relation to the Libyan crisis are considered to have been
unusually quick. On March 17 after much pressure from the rebels themselves and the nations
supporting them, a further resolution was adopted, UN resolution 1973. This imposed a no fly zone
over Syrian airspace while also calling for an immediate cessation of hostilities and gives NATO the
power to act. Ngangje (2011) states this resolution called for the “adoption of all necessary
measures to protect the Libyan Civilian population from Muammar Gaddafi”. Many commentators
and analysts have questioned what this ‘all necessary measures’ should essentially allow and
whether the term was manipulated during the Libyan crisis. It was between the period of February
15th
when the revolution first took hold and March 17th
upon which the no fly zone was imposed that
the protocol ‘Responsibility to Protect’ was indeed in operation
“The sight of attack aircraft targeting Libyan command and control facilities triggered a barrage of
criticisms by anti-interventionist commentators and state leaders” noted Dunne and Gifkins (2011).
Operation Odyssey Dawn to these critics did not appear or resemble anything like humanitarian
protection. The response by the International Community to the crisis that evolved in Libya was
surprisingly swift given the will among nations to intervene in the face of far harsher atrocities that
have occurred in other nations over much longer periods. The inadequate reaction of the world
community to the atrocities committed in the 90’s, particularly in Rwanda and the Balkan Wars,
resulted in the creation of the “responsibility to protect” (RtoP) framework by Kofi Annan. This was
designed to give further clarification to the rationale behind humanitarian interventions.
4. It was between the period of February 15th
when the revolution first took hold and March 17th
upon
which the no fly zone was imposed that the protocol ‘Responsibility to Protect’ was put into
operation. During this period, the Libyan Government was given the opportunity to protect the
people and when it failed to meet this objective, the approval of Libya’s neighbours and the Arab
League was sought and consequently a no fly zone was implemented now that the conditions to act
were met.
Responsibility to Protect
RtoP was collectively implemented by all members of the United Nations at the 2005 World Summit.
Bellamy and Williams (2011) stated that this policy “recognized that states had a responsibility to
protect their populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity;
that international society had a duty to assist states to fulfil RtoP; and that, should a state manifestly
fail to protect its populations from these crimes, international society would take timely and decisive
action through the various propositions set out by the UN Charter”. In authorizing Resolution 1973
on the 27th
March 2011, it represented the first time that the UN Security Council had legitimized the
use of military force in support of humanitarian protection against the desires of a sovereign nation.
The endorsement of RtoP was met with caution by many states. The concept of military intervention
as a legal duty within the framework of RtoP has been questioned. Francioni and Bakker (2013) state
that “The World Summit has expressed its “preparedness” to take measures based on Chapter VII,
but neither did it recognize a “right” of humanitarian intervention outside of the Charter system, nor
a “duty” to do so within the Charter system”. However the approval of the use of force to protect
the people of Libya has been welcomed by some as an endorsement of RtoP protcols.The
implementation of RtoP protocols and also the approval of neighbouring states of Libya and the Arab
League. gave western nations a very powerful mandate for humanitarian intervention.
The term ‘humanitarian intervention’ has now attracted a large network of institutions and
protocols. During the Libya intervention, NATO, The United Nations, The Arab League, The African
Union, The UN Security Council in addition to resolutions adopted, The RtoP protocols and the
International Criminal Court among others all played some part in legitimizing the process of
humanitarian intervention to occur. Such a complex apparatus is designed so that as previously
mentioned the likes of Rwanda do not go unnoticed again.
Nations were unwilling to commit to any legally binding initiative during the Libyan crisis that
involved the international community committing to protecting the Libyan people. States were
reluctant in the face of the fact that it would set a precedent in incidents of a nature whereby they
would be committed on the face of the Libyan experience to act in the same manner. Some
observers have noted the hypocrisy of this position in relation to humanitarian intervention
considering the international community has on this basis accepted that it will only protect some
citizens, from certain countries and only on some occasions. Kersten (2013) states “This seems to
reaffirm a pick-and-choose version of humanitarian interventions which is difficult to distinguish
from the practice selective interventionism of pre-R2P international relations”.
5. Was Military Intervention Justifiable??
In considering the concept of humanitarian intervention in its simplest form, there may have been
just cause as a means of protecting the Libyan people against human rights violations for intervening.
It has its merits however in line with Ranciere’s concept of human rights interventions, the term was
misused and manipulated to launch an intervention for reasons not becoming of its mandate.
There is considerable rationale for stating that Western powers not only intervened for
humanitarian purposes but also to precipitate regime change something RtoP does not envisage nor
allows for within its framework. Others may argue that mission creep set in and the missions
objectives changed in reaction to events on the ground. However the arming of various rebel
factions brings further into question how such emphasis brings about an end to human rights
violations given that conflicts and uprisings that lead to civil wars tend to result in atrocities on both
sides ie Syria.
Vivienne Walt of Time Magazine (2011) reported that Qadhafi’s youngest son Seif-al Arab and three
of Qadhafis children were killed in an airstrike by NATO which narrowly missed the Libyan Leader.
NATO maintained throughout the Libyan conflict that regime change was not the priority but as was
reported during the crisis there were many strikes on the Qadhafi compound in Tripoli, a policy
which seems to suggest that regime change was being pursued. Spillius and Laing (2011) report on
an admission by Admiral Samuel Locklear commander of the NATO Joint Operations Command in
Naples who said in relation to the humanitarian intervention taking place in Libya, “I believe the
scope that NATO is pursuing is beyond what is contemplated in civil protection so they’re exceeding
the mission”. As seen in the war in Iraq, pursuing a policy of regime change can in many instances do
more harm than good.
While humanitarian intervention undoubtedly protected the residents of Benghazi and other areas
during the Libyan crisis, it is unlikely going by present findings that the human rights of Libyan
citizens have improved as a result of NATO’s campaign. United Nations Human Rights (2013) reports
that torture and other forms of ill-treatment in Libya continue to occur, 8,000 detainees are
currently being held without due process.
A major concept of debate within international relations on humanitarian interventions centres
around whether intervention truly reflects the will of the people or whether it is an engineered
process designed to promote people ideally suited to the West. One of the major pitfalls that occur
post humanitarian missions is that the country in question can fall back into civil war given this new
found understanding among local populations that violence can provide change. Much of Libya is
now lawless and run by militias rather than state institutions.
6. It could be argued based on the Human Rights Report mentioned earlier that this government is no
better than the last in certain terms. Valentino (2011) talks about the United States involvement in
this mission and argues that “Washington should replace its focus on military intervention with a
humanitarian foreign policy centred on saving lives by funding public health programs in the
developing world, aiding victims of natural disasters, and assisting refugees fleeing violent conflict”.
When you look at the concept of humanitarian policy from Valentino’s perspective, there is certainly
weight to suggesting that such ethical programs are far from part of the core doctrine of
humanitarian intervention. To suggest that the term ‘humanitarian intervention’ has been hijacked is
not too far from the truth.
7. References
Al Jazeera. (2011). UN authorises no-fly zone over Libya. Available:
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/africa/2011/03/201131720311168561.html. Last
accessed 04/01/2014
Bellamy A. (2011). The new politics of protection? Côte d’Ivoire, Libya and the
responsibility to protect. Available:
http://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/87_4BellamyWilliams.pdf. Last
accessed 04/01/2014
Dunne,T. (2011). Libya and the State of Intervention∗. Available:
http://www.uq.edu.au/isaasiapacific/content/GifkinsDunne.pdf. Last accessed
04/01/2014.
Francioni,F and Bakker,C. (2011). responsibility to protect, Humanitarian intervention
and Human rights: Lessons from Libya to Mali. Available:
http://www.iai.it/pdf/Transworld/TW_WP_15.pdf. Last accessed 04/01/2014.
Hasler, S. (2012). EXPLAINING HUMANITARIAN INTERVENTION IN LIBYA AND NON-
INTERVENTION IN SYRIA. Available: http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a562721.pdf.
Last accessed 06/01/2014.
Hauben, R. (2011). The Role of the UN Security Council in Unleashing an Illegal War
against Libya. Available: http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-role-of-the-un-security-
council-in-unleashing-an-illegal-war-against-libya/25715. Last accessed 06/01/2014.
Kersten, M. (2013). A Fatal Attraction? The UN Security Council and the Relationship
between R2P and the International Criminal Court. Available:
http://www.academia.edu/2017669/A_Fatal_Attraction_The_UN_Security_Council_and_t
he_Relationship_between_R2P_and_the_International_Criminal_Court. Last accessed
01/01/2014.
Mokhefi, M. (2011). Gaddafi’s regime in relation to the Libyan tribes .Available:
www.aljazeera.net/mritems/streams/2011/3/20/1_1049205_1_51.pdf. Last accessed
04/01/2014.
Spillius, A. (2011). Libya: Nato 'trying to kill Col Gaddafi'. Available:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/8599818/Libya
-Nato-trying-to-kill-Col-Gaddafi.html. Last accessed 02/01/2014.
Un Human Rights. (2013). TORTURE AND DEATHS IN DETENTION IN LIBYA . Available:
http://unsmil.unmissions.org/Portals/unsmil/Documents/Torture%20Report%20Libya%2
0En%2001Oct2013.pdf. Last accessed 06/01/2014.
Valentino,B. (2011). The True Costs of Humanitarian Intervention.Available:
http://people.umass.edu/charli/docs/ValentinoFA.pdf. Last accessed 06/01/2014.
8. Walt,M. (2011). Gaddafi Survives a NATO Air Strike, as Fighting Intensifies. Available:
http://content.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2068773,00.html. Last accessed
06/01/2014.