DFSDFSDFASD
Crescent Pure
Harvard Business School Case Study Analysis
Which
Companies
Are
Involved?
Portland Drake Beverages
 Manufacturer of Organic Juices &
Sparkling water.
 Revenue as of 2012 – $120.5 million
 Key People
 Micheal Booth - CEO
 Sarah Ryan - VP, Marketing
 Matt Levor - Director, Market Research
Crescent Pure
 Founded by Peter Hooper in Oregon,2008
 Manufactures Non Alcoholic,
Organic,Performance Enhancing
beverages.
 Acquired by PDP in 2014
 PDP has to decide a positioning strategy
for Crescent Pure.
 It has to analyse –
 Industry Specifics
 Pros & Cons of each option
 Final Recommendation
Product Positioning Options
1.Energy
Drink
3.Organic
Drink
2.Sports
Drink
Target Age
Group
-18 -24 Years
Typical cost of a
can
~ $2 to $5
Market Share
– 85% is
captured by top
4 competitors
Total Market
Value
- $8.5 Billion in
2013
Energy
Drink
Target Age
Group
-12 -24 Years
Typical cost of a
can
~ $1 to $2
Market Share
– 94% is
captured by top
2 competitors
Total Market
Value
- $6.3 Billion in
2012
Sports
Drink
Target Age Group
-Preferred by all
Ages
Includes Soft
drinks,tea,milk &
Soy beverages
Customers are
health conscious
Typical cost of a
can
~ $6.25
(Premium Pricing)
Organic
Drink
Positioning as Sports Drink
 Considered as “anytime
beverage ” by sports beverage
drinkers.
 Wider consumer base as
compared to energy drinks.
 Total Market Value by 2017 –
$9.58 Billion.
 USP - Low sugar content & all
natural ingredients will
appeal to health conscious
customers.
 Average price is ~ $1.5-
$2.With $2.75 price tag
crescent will be premium
priced.
 Concerns rising over relations
of sports drinks with child
obesity.
 Total market size is only
$9.58B as compared to energy
drinks $13.5B
Positioning as Energy Drink
 Positioning as an energy
enhancing drink would
reinforce perceptions from
Oregon.
 Total Market Value by 2018 –
$13.5 Billion.
 Average price for 8 oz. is
$2.99,which is higher than
Crescent Pure’s $2.75.
 USP- Organic Certification &
minimal caffeine content.
 Decline in consumption due
to negative media attention.
 Also frequency of
consumption is less.
 Market entry is difficult due
to many substitutes.
Positioning as Organic Drink
 Chance to dominate an
upcoming market.
 Customers are willing to pay
premium prices.
 Established brand image of
PDP.
 USP- Unique pricing of $2.75
is lower than $3 which is the
price expected by customers.
 Great taste.
 Small customer base of only
health conscious consumers.
 Risk of loosing other
lucrative segments.
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
Energy Drinks
Sports Drinks
Crescent
Customer Perception
Customer Demographics
44%
36%
15%
3% 2%
Age Ranges
18-24
25-34
35-44
45-54
55+
59%
41%
Male
Female
Customer Demographics
44%
36%
15%
3% 2%
Age Ranges
18-24
25-34
35-44
45-54
55+
59%
41%
Male
Female
Entity Amount
Wholesale Price per Can $1.24
Variable Cost per Can (-) $1.02
Profit per can $0.22
Cans per Case 24
Profit per case 24*0.22=$5.28
Total cases produced in 1
month
12,000
Total Cases produced in 1 year 144,000
Profit per year 144,000 x 5.28
= $760320
Advertising Expense (-) $750,000
Net Profit $10,320
RECAP
 Introduction to PDP &
Crescent Pure
Formulating Problem
Statement-
Product Positioning
Pros & Cons
Consumer Reponse
Analysis
Final Recommendation
Organic Energy Drink
Break Even Analysis
DISCLAIMER
Created by Abhijeet Nasery, COEP,during Marketing Internship
by Prof Sameer Mathur, IIM Lucknow

Crescent pure case study

  • 1.
  • 2.
  • 3.
    Portland Drake Beverages Manufacturer of Organic Juices & Sparkling water.  Revenue as of 2012 – $120.5 million  Key People  Micheal Booth - CEO  Sarah Ryan - VP, Marketing  Matt Levor - Director, Market Research
  • 4.
    Crescent Pure  Foundedby Peter Hooper in Oregon,2008  Manufactures Non Alcoholic, Organic,Performance Enhancing beverages.  Acquired by PDP in 2014
  • 6.
     PDP hasto decide a positioning strategy for Crescent Pure.  It has to analyse –  Industry Specifics  Pros & Cons of each option  Final Recommendation
  • 7.
  • 8.
    Target Age Group -18 -24Years Typical cost of a can ~ $2 to $5 Market Share – 85% is captured by top 4 competitors Total Market Value - $8.5 Billion in 2013 Energy Drink
  • 9.
    Target Age Group -12 -24Years Typical cost of a can ~ $1 to $2 Market Share – 94% is captured by top 2 competitors Total Market Value - $6.3 Billion in 2012 Sports Drink
  • 10.
    Target Age Group -Preferredby all Ages Includes Soft drinks,tea,milk & Soy beverages Customers are health conscious Typical cost of a can ~ $6.25 (Premium Pricing) Organic Drink
  • 11.
    Positioning as SportsDrink  Considered as “anytime beverage ” by sports beverage drinkers.  Wider consumer base as compared to energy drinks.  Total Market Value by 2017 – $9.58 Billion.  USP - Low sugar content & all natural ingredients will appeal to health conscious customers.  Average price is ~ $1.5- $2.With $2.75 price tag crescent will be premium priced.  Concerns rising over relations of sports drinks with child obesity.  Total market size is only $9.58B as compared to energy drinks $13.5B
  • 12.
    Positioning as EnergyDrink  Positioning as an energy enhancing drink would reinforce perceptions from Oregon.  Total Market Value by 2018 – $13.5 Billion.  Average price for 8 oz. is $2.99,which is higher than Crescent Pure’s $2.75.  USP- Organic Certification & minimal caffeine content.  Decline in consumption due to negative media attention.  Also frequency of consumption is less.  Market entry is difficult due to many substitutes.
  • 13.
    Positioning as OrganicDrink  Chance to dominate an upcoming market.  Customers are willing to pay premium prices.  Established brand image of PDP.  USP- Unique pricing of $2.75 is lower than $3 which is the price expected by customers.  Great taste.  Small customer base of only health conscious consumers.  Risk of loosing other lucrative segments.
  • 14.
  • 15.
    Customer Demographics 44% 36% 15% 3% 2% AgeRanges 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55+ 59% 41% Male Female
  • 16.
    Customer Demographics 44% 36% 15% 3% 2% AgeRanges 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55+ 59% 41% Male Female
  • 20.
    Entity Amount Wholesale Priceper Can $1.24 Variable Cost per Can (-) $1.02 Profit per can $0.22 Cans per Case 24 Profit per case 24*0.22=$5.28 Total cases produced in 1 month 12,000 Total Cases produced in 1 year 144,000 Profit per year 144,000 x 5.28 = $760320 Advertising Expense (-) $750,000 Net Profit $10,320
  • 23.
    RECAP  Introduction toPDP & Crescent Pure Formulating Problem Statement- Product Positioning Pros & Cons Consumer Reponse Analysis Final Recommendation Organic Energy Drink Break Even Analysis
  • 24.
    DISCLAIMER Created by AbhijeetNasery, COEP,during Marketing Internship by Prof Sameer Mathur, IIM Lucknow