The document discusses some of the costs and issues with closed or overly proprietary science. It notes that closed science can refer to unpublished research available only to a select few, or publishing publicly funded research in pay-per-use journals, meaning the public pays twice to fund the research. One example given is a 1984 study on spinal cord injuries whose results were heavily criticized and found to be statistically insignificant in later studies. Open science is proposed as an alternative, defined as transparency in methodology, publicly available data, open communication and collaboration. The state of open access and open science in Austria and the EU is then outlined.