Law of E-Commerce & Contractual Obligation in India
Definition of E-Commerce
E-Commerce v. E-Business
Definition of Commerce
Contracts & Business done Online
E-Contracting: The Basic Rules (2/2/2001)Shawn Tuma
This is a presentation that discusses the basics of contracting over the Internet -- back in 2001 -- before the rules for Internet contracting were settled. The date of the presentation was February 2, 2001. This is a Golden Oldie!
Law of E-Commerce & Contractual Obligation in India
Definition of E-Commerce
E-Commerce v. E-Business
Definition of Commerce
Contracts & Business done Online
E-Contracting: The Basic Rules (2/2/2001)Shawn Tuma
This is a presentation that discusses the basics of contracting over the Internet -- back in 2001 -- before the rules for Internet contracting were settled. The date of the presentation was February 2, 2001. This is a Golden Oldie!
E-contracting and Commerce is presented by Pria Chetty and details the South African legal position with regard to electronic contracts and the effect on commerce.
Cyber law is ever changing and this quick guide to online contracting and e contracts is for customers and vendors alike. If you shop on the internet this guide will assist you grasp key concepts. It is not legal advice.
E contracts and validity of e contracts in IndiaKajalRandhawa
what is e-contract, types of e-contract, parties to e-contract, essentials of e-contract, provisions of e-contract under various laws, judgment on the validity of e-contract, validity and enforceability of e-contracts, electronic signature, legal issues involved in e-contract, Place of formation of an E-Contract and the area of jurisdiction in case of Breach, Admissibility of Electronic contracts as evidence in Courts, suggestions, conclusion
Back in 2001, there were a lot of Internet Law issues that were just beginning to be explored which is what gave rise to the title "Internet Law: An Expedition" -- what we did not realize back then was that many of those issues would still be evolving 15 years later! For example, this presentation discusses use of email and whether it is safe and appropriate for confidential information; Internet or computer use policies, something that I still discuss frequently, and privacy issues in the employment context. It was fascinating to take a look back down memory lane with these presentation slides.
this is a presentation on electronic contracts. this will be helpful in the study of various types of contract in the law. this topic is also there in the BBA course. in legal environment - 2
The revolutionary progresses in information technology have a deep rooted impact in
global communication and that’s also having a great impact in the national as well as
the global business environment.
.Along with its growing importance it also has challenges due to technological issues
and their legal consequences.
In this study the key elements of e-contract (in light of the Indian Contract Act, 1872)
has been discussed. Its various issues related to Evidence Act, IT Act, Stamping laws,
consumer disputes has been covered.
E-contract is new phenomenon in modern business, so there are some ambiguities in
technical and legal issues but will be solved
E-contracting and Commerce is presented by Pria Chetty and details the South African legal position with regard to electronic contracts and the effect on commerce.
Cyber law is ever changing and this quick guide to online contracting and e contracts is for customers and vendors alike. If you shop on the internet this guide will assist you grasp key concepts. It is not legal advice.
E contracts and validity of e contracts in IndiaKajalRandhawa
what is e-contract, types of e-contract, parties to e-contract, essentials of e-contract, provisions of e-contract under various laws, judgment on the validity of e-contract, validity and enforceability of e-contracts, electronic signature, legal issues involved in e-contract, Place of formation of an E-Contract and the area of jurisdiction in case of Breach, Admissibility of Electronic contracts as evidence in Courts, suggestions, conclusion
Back in 2001, there were a lot of Internet Law issues that were just beginning to be explored which is what gave rise to the title "Internet Law: An Expedition" -- what we did not realize back then was that many of those issues would still be evolving 15 years later! For example, this presentation discusses use of email and whether it is safe and appropriate for confidential information; Internet or computer use policies, something that I still discuss frequently, and privacy issues in the employment context. It was fascinating to take a look back down memory lane with these presentation slides.
this is a presentation on electronic contracts. this will be helpful in the study of various types of contract in the law. this topic is also there in the BBA course. in legal environment - 2
The revolutionary progresses in information technology have a deep rooted impact in
global communication and that’s also having a great impact in the national as well as
the global business environment.
.Along with its growing importance it also has challenges due to technological issues
and their legal consequences.
In this study the key elements of e-contract (in light of the Indian Contract Act, 1872)
has been discussed. Its various issues related to Evidence Act, IT Act, Stamping laws,
consumer disputes has been covered.
E-contract is new phenomenon in modern business, so there are some ambiguities in
technical and legal issues but will be solved
Consumer barriers to mobile internet adoption in AsiaTuan Anh Nguyen
This research examines why more than 2 billion people in the region can access the internet but are holding back from doing so.
This includes data from six markets in the region: China, India, Indonesia, Philippines, Thailand and Vietnam with approximately 1,000 people in each country
Commercially Minded – Seminar Series – Commercial Terms and ConditionsHCRLaw
The third and final seminar in the Commercially Minded series from the Commercial and Commercial Litigation teams at Harrison Clark Rickerbys covers the new Consumer Regulations and how they affect your business’ terms and conditions.
http://www.hcrlaw.com/
What is the Impact of the New Standard on the Intermediate Accounting Course?Cengage Learning
Presented by: Jefferson P. Jones Auburn University and Donald P. Pagach North Carolina State University
This session will address why the new standard was issued, its impact on the intermediate accounting course, and guidance on how to teach the new standard in the intermediate accounting course. Authors Jeff Jones and Don Pagach will also discuss how the new standard will be addressed in the second edition of Wahlen/Jones/Pagach Intermediate Accounting 2e.
Brian Miller, a solicitor and partner at Stone King LLP, goes through the new changes in the law as of 1 October 2015 which all businesses and organisations who deal with consumers need to know to ensure they are legally compliant.
111CORPORATE AWARD PROGRAMMEASSIGNMENT FRONT S.docxRAJU852744
1
11
CORPORATE AWARD PROGRAMME
ASSIGNMENT FRONT SHEET
STUDENT MEMBERSHIP NUMBER
COHORT NAME and NUMBER
Cohort 6
ASSESSMENT Code / Number
AS2
MODULE TITLE
Developing Contracts in Procurement and Supply
SUBMISSION DEADLINE DATE
Second Submission
WORD COUNT
3184
Please do not change or remove the wording in this front sheet as this is required for all submissions under the Corporate Award Programme. Any submissions received without the correct front sheet will be returned to the candidate for amendment and re-submission and may delay marking.
1. Please ensure that you complete and attach this form to the front of your submission. It will not be accepted if it as sent as a separate file to the submission itself.
2. Before submission, please ensure that your name does not appear anywhere on your work.
3. By submitting your work, you are confirming that your work is your own and that you have read and understand CIPS rules regarding plagiarism and the consequences that will arise should you submit plagiarised work.
Table of Content
1. Executive summary
2. Question one……………………………………………………………………….
3. Question two ………………………………………………………………………
4. Question three ……………………………………………………………………
5. Conclusion
Introduction:
Terms and conditions is a set of regulations, which supplier and customer must agree to follow in order to create a contract. They will have to agree on terms and conditions of the contract as well as any possible liabilities in case of a breach of the contract. As one of the major companies in the world, SABIC has a set of detailed terms and conditions referred to as Standard Terms and Conditions in which supplier accepts and aware of before registering in SABIC as an approved supplier. Certainly, it is open for negotiation before the creation of the contract. The standard terms and conditions is very comprehensive to accommodate all type of contracts and types of suppliers. For instance, there is a special terms and contract for internal and external of KSA.
Executive summary
Subject matter
This report evaluates and provides an analysis of the opportunities for the supply and procurement function, explains how the terms and conditions can be improved and how collaboration can be created with stakeholders to increase early engagement. The report also gives a general overview of the need for organizational policies and procurement in order to implement effective procurement supply.
Key findings
· After doing an extensive research, I drew attention to the fact that the company should identify and allocate purchasing activities to achieve the best value for money. I found out that it can be done by applying the five rights of acquisition and value for money criteria to any purchase of good and services similarly assessing the acquisition of possessions and amenities based on total cost of ownership is an important step. Furthermore, creating savings and improve efficiency requires the company to negotiate with the supplier.
111CORPORATE AWARD PROGRAMMEASSIGNMENT FRONT S.docxaulasnilda
1
11
CORPORATE AWARD PROGRAMME
ASSIGNMENT FRONT SHEET
STUDENT MEMBERSHIP NUMBER
COHORT NAME and NUMBER
Cohort 6
ASSESSMENT Code / Number
AS2
MODULE TITLE
Developing Contracts in Procurement and Supply
SUBMISSION DEADLINE DATE
Second Submission
WORD COUNT
3184
Please do not change or remove the wording in this front sheet as this is required for all submissions under the Corporate Award Programme. Any submissions received without the correct front sheet will be returned to the candidate for amendment and re-submission and may delay marking.
1. Please ensure that you complete and attach this form to the front of your submission. It will not be accepted if it as sent as a separate file to the submission itself.
2. Before submission, please ensure that your name does not appear anywhere on your work.
3. By submitting your work, you are confirming that your work is your own and that you have read and understand CIPS rules regarding plagiarism and the consequences that will arise should you submit plagiarised work.
Table of Content
1. Executive summary
2. Question one……………………………………………………………………….
3. Question two ………………………………………………………………………
4. Question three ……………………………………………………………………
5. Conclusion
Introduction:
Terms and conditions is a set of regulations, which supplier and customer must agree to follow in order to create a contract. They will have to agree on terms and conditions of the contract as well as any possible liabilities in case of a breach of the contract. As one of the major companies in the world, SABIC has a set of detailed terms and conditions referred to as Standard Terms and Conditions in which supplier accepts and aware of before registering in SABIC as an approved supplier. Certainly, it is open for negotiation before the creation of the contract. The standard terms and conditions is very comprehensive to accommodate all type of contracts and types of suppliers. For instance, there is a special terms and contract for internal and external of KSA.
Executive summary
Subject matter
This report evaluates and provides an analysis of the opportunities for the supply and procurement function, explains how the terms and conditions can be improved and how collaboration can be created with stakeholders to increase early engagement. The report also gives a general overview of the need for organizational policies and procurement in order to implement effective procurement supply.
Key findings
· After doing an extensive research, I drew attention to the fact that the company should identify and allocate purchasing activities to achieve the best value for money. I found out that it can be done by applying the five rights of acquisition and value for money criteria to any purchase of good and services similarly assessing the acquisition of possessions and amenities based on total cost of ownership is an important step. Furthermore, creating savings and improve efficiency requires the company to negotiate with the supplier ...
Rachel McEwen's (Scottish and Southern Energy) presentation to STUC's Decent Work, Dignified Lives conference of 15 October 2014 in which she explains SSE's approach to implementing the living wage.
Introducing Pay4. The flexible and cost-effective way to finance payments to your suppliers. For growing UK businesses to make unsecured financed payments to suppliers in the UK and globally. Up to 120 days credit on every transaction and a credit facility between £50k and £1milion. Pay4 (UK) Limited
Commercial Disputes – Have you got them covered?watsonburton
Commercial Disputes – Have you got them covered?
Slides from Lockton & Watson Burton
Tuesday 2 July 2013
Richard Palmer & Bal Manak - Watson Burton LLP
Michael Farrell & Anthony Place - Lockton Companies LLP
Presented by EndCoder Denise Fouche, this presentation describes South Africa's legal response to cyber security threats, particularly in the banking industry.
The Protection of Personal Information Act: A PresentationEndcode_org
What does the Protection of Personal information Act mean for business and for cybersecurity? Find out the implications of South Africa's new technology law Act.
Mutual Non Disclosure Agreement (South Africa)Endcode_org
This Mutual Non Disclosure Agreement template is available to all EndCode for Innovators members for use.
To join this group, please follow this link:
http://www.linkedin.com/groups/EndCode-Innovators-8158861/about
NATURE, ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL LAW.pptxanvithaav
These slides helps the student of international law to understand what is the nature of international law? and how international law was originated and developed?.
The slides was well structured along with the highlighted points for better understanding .
How to Obtain Permanent Residency in the NetherlandsBridgeWest.eu
You can rely on our assistance if you are ready to apply for permanent residency. Find out more at: https://immigration-netherlands.com/obtain-a-permanent-residence-permit-in-the-netherlands/.
ALL EYES ON RAFAH BUT WHY Explain more.pdf46adnanshahzad
All eyes on Rafah: But why?. The Rafah border crossing, a crucial point between Egypt and the Gaza Strip, often finds itself at the center of global attention. As we explore the significance of Rafah, we’ll uncover why all eyes are on Rafah and the complexities surrounding this pivotal region.
INTRODUCTION
What makes Rafah so significant that it captures global attention? The phrase ‘All eyes are on Rafah’ resonates not just with those in the region but with people worldwide who recognize its strategic, humanitarian, and political importance. In this guide, we will delve into the factors that make Rafah a focal point for international interest, examining its historical context, humanitarian challenges, and political dimensions.
Responsibilities of the office bearers while registering multi-state cooperat...Finlaw Consultancy Pvt Ltd
Introduction-
The process of register multi-state cooperative society in India is governed by the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002. This process requires the office bearers to undertake several crucial responsibilities to ensure compliance with legal and regulatory frameworks. The key office bearers typically include the President, Secretary, and Treasurer, along with other elected members of the managing committee. Their responsibilities encompass administrative, legal, and financial duties essential for the successful registration and operation of the society.
In 2020, the Ministry of Home Affairs established a committee led by Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh, former Vice Chancellor of National Law University (NLU), Delhi. This committee was tasked with reviewing the three codes of criminal law. The primary objective of the committee was to propose comprehensive reforms to the country’s criminal laws in a manner that is both principled and effective.
The committee’s focus was on ensuring the safety and security of individuals, communities, and the nation as a whole. Throughout its deliberations, the committee aimed to uphold constitutional values such as justice, dignity, and the intrinsic value of each individual. Their goal was to recommend amendments to the criminal laws that align with these values and priorities.
Subsequently, in February, the committee successfully submitted its recommendations regarding amendments to the criminal law. These recommendations are intended to serve as a foundation for enhancing the current legal framework, promoting safety and security, and upholding the constitutional principles of justice, dignity, and the inherent worth of every individual.
Military Commissions details LtCol Thomas Jasper as Detailed Defense CounselThomas (Tom) Jasper
Military Commissions Trial Judiciary, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Notice of the Chief Defense Counsel's detailing of LtCol Thomas F. Jasper, Jr. USMC, as Detailed Defense Counsel for Abd Al Hadi Al-Iraqi on 6 August 2014 in the case of United States v. Hadi al Iraqi (10026)
PRECEDENT AS A SOURCE OF LAW (SAIF JAVED).pptxOmGod1
Precedent, or stare decisis, is a cornerstone of common law systems where past judicial decisions guide future cases, ensuring consistency and predictability in the legal system. Binding precedents from higher courts must be followed by lower courts, while persuasive precedents may influence but are not obligatory. This principle promotes fairness and efficiency, allowing for the evolution of the law as higher courts can overrule outdated decisions. Despite criticisms of rigidity and complexity, precedent ensures similar cases are treated alike, balancing stability with flexibility in judicial decision-making.
A "File Trademark" is a legal term referring to the registration of a unique symbol, logo, or name used to identify and distinguish products or services. This process provides legal protection, granting exclusive rights to the trademark owner, and helps prevent unauthorized use by competitors.
Visit Now: https://www.tumblr.com/trademark-quick/751620857551634432/ensure-legal-protection-file-your-trademark-with?source=share
VIETNAM - DIRECT POWER PURCHASE AGREEMENTS (DPPA) - Latest development - What...
Consumer Protection
1. REINFORCING CONSUMER RIGHTS:
RETURN, REPAIR, OR REFUND?
The concurrency of the CPA and the NCA
DENISE FOUCHE
ENDCODER/ ENDCODE.ORG
2. CONTEXT:
South African Consumer Protection law
The Right to Return, Repair or Refund
The NCA and these rights
Technology challenges to consumer rights
Brand risk – staying true to the promise
Recommendations
3. SA Consumer Protection law
2002
EC
T
2005
(2007)
2008
1985 1996
(2011) 2013
UNGCP NCA CPA POPI
CONSTITUTIO
N
4. Return, Repair, or Refund
• CPA: Right to Return S20
• Right to return if defective within 6 months of
purchase date.
• Consumer chooses remedy-repair, refund or
replacement.
• Service provider may not insist on repairing but
entitled to examine or send it away to be
assessed but not to be assessed and then simply
repaired without consumer agreement to that
repair.
• In cases of direct marketing 5 days to
automatically cancel and claim a refund.
5. Return, Repair, or Refund
• No general right of return in terms of SA law
• CPA: 4 instances when one can return goods
1. Direct marketing cooling-off period s16
• 5 days
2. Goods which have not been seen before purchase s20 with s19
• Upon delivery
3. Good do not meet particular purpose s55(3)
• 10 days
4. Implied warranty of quality s56
• Up to 6 months
• ECT: consumer provisions trumps CPA for online purchases
• 1-3 above do not apply
• General right to return (cooling off period)
• 7 days
6. Return, Repair, or Refund
• CPA
• Direct Marketing – Cooling Off period s16
• s16(1) does not apply to a transaction if s44 of the ECT applies
• A consumer may rescind a transaction resulting from any direct
marketing without reason or penalty s16(3)
• by notice to the supplier in writing,
• within five business days
• A supplier must– S16(4)
• Return any payment within 15 business days after
• receiving notice of the rescission, if no goods had been delivered to the
consumer or
• receiving from the consumer any goods supplied in terms of the
transaction
• Not attempt to collect any payment in terms of a rescinded
transaction
7. Return, Repair, or Refund
• CPA
• Consumer’s rights with respect to delivery of goods or
supply of service s19
• s19 does not apply to a transaction if s46 of the ECT applies
• S19(2)(a) the supplier is responsible to deliver the goods or perform the
services–
• on the agreed date and time or within a reasonable time after concluding the
transaction or agreement
• at agreed place of delivery
• at cost of supplier
• The goods remain at the supplier’s risk until the consumer has
accepted delivery
• Allow consumer reasonable opportunity to examine the goods to
ascertain consumer is satisfied goods are as contemplated in the
agreement s19(5)
8. Return, Repair, or Refund
• CPA
• Consumer’s rights with respect to delivery of goods or supply
Location / date /
time other than
as agreed
Accept the
delivery
Require at
agreed location
/ date / time
Cancel without
penalty
Larger quantity of
goods
Reject all
Accept agreed,
treat excess as
per s21
Mixed goods
Accept agreed
upon goods
Reject all
of service s19
9. Return, Repair, or Refund
CPA
• Unsolicited goods or services s21
Supplier informs
consumer goods were
delivered in error within
10 days
Becomes unsolicited if
supplier fails to recover
them within 20 business
days after informing
Clearly addresses to
another person
Becomes unsolicited only if
recipient informs supplier
and not recovered within
the following 20 business
days.
• Must not frustrate recovery attempts
• Not liable for loss or damage during time
in person’s possession or control
• If a person is in possession of unsolicited
goods, person may retain the goods
/return at supplier’s expense
• Supplier liable to any other person in
respect of any right or valid claim relating
to such goods.
• Person has no obligation to pay for unsolicited goods
or services
• If consumer has made any payment relating to
unsolicited goods or services, consumer is entitled to
recover that amount with interest
10. Return, Repair, or Refund
• S54 Consumer’s rights to demand quality service
• 54(2) If supplier fails to perform a service to the standards contemplated in subsection (1) the
consumer may require the supplier to either remedy any defect or refund a reasonable portion
of price paid for services performed and goods supplied, having regard to the extent of the
failure.
• S55 Consumer’s rights to safe, good quality goods
• Right to receive goods:
• Reasonably suited for purpose for which intended
• Good quality
• Free of any defects
• S56 Implied warranty of quality
• Within 6 months after the delivery of any goods, consumer may return the goods to the
supplier without penalty and at supplier’s risk and expense if goods fail to satisfy requirements
and standards contemplated in s55 and supplier must at direction of consumer either repair or
replace the failed, unsafe or defective goods; or refund the consumer the price paid
• S56 Implied warranty of quality
• Warranty on repaired goods for a period of three months
11. Return, Repair, or Refund
Supplier unable to deliver goods in
respect of lay-by and consumer has paid
full price
consumer option: supply
equivalent of goods
refund the consumer money paid
with interest if inability to supply is
due to circumstances beyond
supplier control
double the amount paid as
compensation for breach of
contract
• Lay-bys s62(2)(b)
• Pre-paid service (s64 (3)(b))
• If a supplier intends to close a facility to which the supplier has committed to provide future
access in terms of an agreement with a consumer to provide any service without making
available a reasonably alternative facility, supplier must no later than five business days after
closing the facility refund the balance of any money belonging to the consumer
12. Return, Repair, or Refund
• NCA:
Designed to protect consumer in the credit market and make
credit and banking services more accessible.
• Lower income earners with limited access to credit channels
• Complex credit agreements rendered many consumers vulnerable to credit
providers.
• Regulate consumer credit and credit marketing practices
• Promote responsible credit granting and use
• Prohibit reckless credit granting
• Regulate credit information
• Established recourse for unfair credit practices.
13. Return, Repair, or Refund
• NCA & CPA:
• CPA does not apply where transaction constitutes a credit
agreement under the NCA S2(d)
• Goods and services that are the subject of the credit agreement
are not excluded from the CPA ambit.
• A credit provider sells a product to a consumer on credit, the credit
agreement must be drafted in terms of the NCA.
• Consumer will be afforded CPA protection regarding the product,
such as the right to return faulty goods.
• Inconsistency between CPA and other law, must be interpreted
concurrently. S9
• Act thus must be applied concurrently with the NCA. If not
possible, Act most beneficial to consumer will prevail.
14. Return, Repair, or Refund
• NCA & CPA:
• If credit provider sells a product under a credit agreement, credit
agreement must comply with NCA and CPA.
• Drafted in plain understandable language
• Not contain prohibited contract terms and conditions
• Consumer not be required to waive any rights
• CPA provisions regarding safety monitoring and recall and liability for
damages caused by goods apply to all transactions even those exempted
from CPA application.
• NCA regulates process, content, formalities, rights and obligations related
to credit agreements; CPA regulates rights of consumers regarding
standard and quality of goods and services supplied.
• Two Acts must be read together.
• When a credit provider sells a product to a consumer on credit, the credit
agreement must be drafted in terms of the NCA
16. Return, Repair, or Refund
• NCA
• CONSUMER RIGHTS:
Apply for credit
Protected against
discrimination in granting
of credit
Informed by credit not
granted
Receive free copy of credit
agreement
Credit agreement in plain
language
Personal and financial info
treated confidentially
Understand all fees, costs,
interest rates, total
instalment and any other
details
Say no to increases on
credit limit
To decide whether you
want to be informed
about products or services
via telephone, sms, mail or
email campaigns
To apply for debt
counselling
17. Return, Repair, or Refund
• NCA
• MARKETING TO CONSUMERS:
Restricts and
outlaws certain
practices of loan
canvassing
Automatic credit
limit increases and
negative option
marketing
Provides for clear
and understandable
marketing
communications
Consumers must
receive detailed
quote valid for 5
days
Caps interest rates
Caps maximum
amount a credit
provider can charge
for other fees
18. Return, Repair, or Refund
• NCA
• MARKETING TO CONSUMERS: specific provisions
• Early settlement of credit agreements
• Consumer may terminate the credit agreement at any time by paying the settlement
amount. s122
• Consumer entitled to cancel a credit agreement at any time with or without prior
notice to credit provider. s125
19. Tech challenges to consumer rights
• Internet: applicable law
• Big data: privacy violations
• Growing power imbalance: private sector has more information
on consumers’ spending habits and credit histories than
consumers themselves
• Online Competitions
• Electronic commerce: understanding terms, conditions and costs related to online
transactions; delivery; payment
“Online finger-wagging, lawsuits, disgruntled customers -- they're the
unfortunate byproducts of what many people perceive to be big data abuses.”
According to a September 2013 study from data privacy management company Truste, 1 of
3 Internet users say they have stopped using a company's website or have stopped doing
business with a company altogether because of privacy concerns.
20. Tech challenges to consumer rights
• European Commission Directive on Consumer Rights:
to protect consumers purchasing goods online
• Ban on “cost-traps”. Online buyers to confirm understanding of price to be paid
• Returning goods: reimbursement for goods not matching expectations. Extension from 7 to
14 calendar days under which consumers can withdraw from a sales contract.
• Transparency: traders obliged to disclose total cost of product or service and any extra fees;
extra charges for paying by credit card will not be allowed; bans pre-ticked boxes on
additional services
• Online search: increasing number of ads and paid linkes in search result pages. More
complicated to access best options and most competitive prices as Google drives viewers to
sponsored services.
“The greatest concern of respondents is that, returning a product
they did not like and getting reimbursed, is not easy”.
Civic Consulting, 2011 poll of European online shoppers
21. CPA Enforcement issues
• Weak enforcement mechanisms
• Consumer awareness is low
• National Consumer Tribunal: administrative penalties. Enforcement through
compliance notices
• Safety monitoring and recall (s60). The National Consumer Commission must
promote systems to receive notice of the return of any goods because of a failure,
defect or hazard
“Complain, complain, complain - I can't say it enough - complain.
Take advantage of the commission because at the end of the day, you can have the best
laws in the world, you can have the most well equipped commission but if you don't tell us
what the problems are - we have no way of knowing.”
National Consumer Commissioner Mamodupi Mohlala to the South African public
22. Avoiding brand risk
• South Africans posted more than
5 million tweets* during Q4
2011
• Next nearest was Kenya with
2.47 million tweets
• Nigeria was the third most-active
country with 1.65 million
tweets
South Africa has the most active Twitter population in Africa
* Survey analysing 11.5m geo-located tweets across Africa. Source: PC Mag (2012)
http://www.slideshare.net/OnDevice/south-africa-mobile-consumer-trends
23. Avoiding
brand risk
• Social media provides a
platform for happy and
disgruntled customers
• An unmediated channel
for commenting on brand
experiences
• Compliance with
consumer legislation as a
barrier to the channel
24. Recommendations
Create campaigns with the consumer in mind:
• Product and/or services promises are achievable
Ensure Refund and Returns policies are in place and compliant:
• Training:
• CPA
• Refund and Returns policies
• Enforcement
• Outsourcing of services to digital marketing specialists: governance of outsourcing
agreement
Website disclosures:
• Your company: kind of business; location; contact details
• The products and services: exactly what is being sold, at what cost
• The Sale: additional costs relating to sale; warranties or guarantees; safe payment
options; estimated delivery date for the order
• Consumer Protections: privacy policy; policies on unsolicited email; complaints
procedures; return, refund or repair policies.
25. Recommendations
Standard Business terms and conditions:
• Review in terms of consumer legislation
Marketing practices and methods:
• Review in terms of consumer legislation
Consumer law impact on business:
• Complianece framework and rollout of compliance programmes
26. Case study
• Standard Bank of South Africa Ltd v Dlamini (2877/2011) [2012] ZAKZDHC 64;
2013 (1) SA 219 (KZD) 23 October 2012
Case law backing the consumer’s right to plain language in terms of the NCA and the
CPA
I’m going to consider the South African consumer’s right to choose when goods are not to their satisfaction. The right to choose to either return goods, have them repaired or receive a refund is provided for in the CPA. Although credit agreements concluded in terms of the NCA are excluded from the ambit of the CPA, the goods and services that are the subject of the agreement are not e
South Africa late in implementing consumer protection legislation. UN Guidelines on Consumer Protection were published in 1985. The UK’s CPA was enacted in 1987. Nigeria implemented its Consumer Protection Council Act in 1992, Botswana adopted consumer legislation in 1998.
SA follows a rights-based approach as set out in the UNGuidelines
South African consumer protection legislation has been criticised for weak enforcement mechanisms.
Enforcement weakness is a global problem even though many countries have strengthened their laws
CI maintains that CPAs are not a guarantee of consumer protection (CI Report: State of consumer protection around the world 2014 report). Weak implementation, and laws are not revised once passed.
Balance between protecting consumers and ensuring access to credit a core issue
(International Associattion of Consumer Law biannual conference Sept 2013)
The CPA makes provision for 8 fundamental consumer rights. These include: the right to equalityin the market
5 days after receiving the goods, the consumer can return/cancel entire contract without penalty/and receive a full refund. Consumer pays costs to return goods
2. no opportunity to examine or inspect actual goods received prior to purchase, on delivery they are entitled to inspect. If good do not meet ‘type’ or ‘quality’ reasonably expected from agreement or if do not conform to specification in terms of a special order, consumer can refuse delivery/receive full refund/ and cancel without penalty. Supplier is liable for return costs.
3. 10 days after receiving goods consumer can return the goods if it is not suitable for the particular purpose, cancel wihtou penalty, supplier liable for return costs. Not entitled to return if public regulation prohibits or goods have been disassesmbled, altered, added to or combined with other goods and property.
4. all goods sold are sold with an implied warranty of quality that cannot be contracted out of or revoked, Warranty gives consumer right to receive goods that are reasonably suitable for purpose intended to be used for, are of good quality, free of defects and will be durable and usable for a reasonable period of time. If goods do not comply up to 6 months return or get goods replaced or get goods repaired. Without penality at supplier’s cost.
ECT for 7 days after delivery for any reason without penalty but consumer liable for costs of return.
4 instances when one can return goods under CPA:
Direct marketing cooling-off period: s16 5 days after receiving, consumer can return/cancel entire contract without penalty/and receive a full refund. Consumer pays costs to return goods
Goods which have not been seen before purchase: s20 (read with s19) no opportunity to examine or inspect actual goods received prior to purchase, on delivery they are entitled to inspect. If good do not meet ‘type’ or ‘quality’ reasonably expected from agreement or if do not conform to specification in terms of a special order, consumer can refuse delivery/receive full refund/ and cancel without penalty. Supplier is liable for return costs.
Good do not meet particular purpose. S55(3) 10 days after receiving goods consumer can return the goods if it is not suitable for the particular purpose, cancel without penalty, supplier liable for return costs. Not entitled to return if public regulation prohibits or goods have been disassesmbled, altered, added to or combined with other goods and property.
Implied warranty of quality. S56 all goods sold are sold with an implied warranty of quality that cannot be contracted out of or revoked, Warranty gives consumer right to receive goods that are reasonably suitable for purpose intended to be used for, are of good quality, free of defects and will be durable and usable for a reasonable period of time. If goods do not comply up to 6 months return or get goods replaced or get goods repaired. Without penality at supplier’s cost.
ECT: consumer provisions will trump CPA. Online purchases. Reasons for return 1-3 do not apply if ECT Act provisions apply to the transaction. Instead of these right of return consumers have: a general right to return (cooling off period); for 7 days after delivery for any reason without penalty but consumer liable for costs of return.
4 instances when one can return goods under CPA:
Direct marketing cooling-off period: s16 5 days after receiving, consumer can return/cancel entire contract without penalty/and receive a full refund. Consumer pays costs to return goods
Goods which have not been seen before purchase: s20 (read with s19) no opportunity to examine or inspect actual goods received prior to purchase, on delivery they are entitled to inspect. If good do not meet ‘type’ or ‘quality’ reasonably expected from agreement or if do not conform to specification in terms of a special order, consumer can refuse delivery/receive full refund/ and cancel without penalty. Supplier is liable for return costs.
Good do not meet particular purpose. S55(3) 10 days after receiving goods consumer can return the goods if it is not suitable for the particular purpose, cancel without penalty, supplier liable for return costs. Not entitled to return if public regulation prohibits or goods have been disassesmbled, altered, added to or combined with other goods and property.
Implied warranty of quality. S56 all goods sold are sold with an implied warranty of quality that cannot be contracted out of or revoked, Warranty gives consumer right to receive goods that are reasonably suitable for purpose intended to be used for, are of good quality, free of defects and will be durable and usable for a reasonable period of time. If goods do not comply up to 6 months return or get goods replaced or get goods repaired. Without penality at supplier’s cost.
ECT: consumer provisions will trump CPA. Online purchases. Reasons for return 1-3 do not apply if ECT Act provisions apply to the transaction. Instead of these right of return consumers have: a general right to return (cooling off period); for 7 days after delivery for any reason without penalty but consumer liable for costs of return.
4 instances when one can return goods under CPA:
Direct marketing cooling-off period: s16 5 days after receiving, consumer can return/cancel entire contract without penalty/and receive a full refund. Consumer pays costs to return goods
Goods which have not been seen before purchase: s20 (read with s19) no opportunity to examine or inspect actual goods received prior to purchase, on delivery they are entitled to inspect. If good do not meet ‘type’ or ‘quality’ reasonably expected from agreement or if do not conform to specification in terms of a special order, consumer can refuse delivery/receive full refund/ and cancel without penalty. Supplier is liable for return costs.
Good do not meet particular purpose. S55(3) 10 days after receiving goods consumer can return the goods if it is not suitable for the particular purpose, cancel without penalty, supplier liable for return costs. Not entitled to return if public regulation prohibits or goods have been disassesmbled, altered, added to or combined with other goods and property.
Implied warranty of quality. S56 all goods sold are sold with an implied warranty of quality that cannot be contracted out of or revoked, Warranty gives consumer right to receive goods that are reasonably suitable for purpose intended to be used for, are of good quality, free of defects and will be durable and usable for a reasonable period of time. If goods do not comply up to 6 months return or get goods replaced or get goods repaired. Without penality at supplier’s cost.
ECT: consumer provisions will trump CPA. Online purchases. Reasons for return 1-3 do not apply if ECT Act provisions apply to the transaction. Instead of these right of return consumers have: a general right to return (cooling off period); for 7 days after delivery for any reason without penalty but consumer liable for costs of return.
4 instances when one can return goods under CPA:
Direct marketing cooling-off period: s16 5 days after receiving, consumer can return/cancel entire contract without penalty/and receive a full refund. Consumer pays costs to return goods
Goods which have not been seen before purchase: s20 (read with s19) no opportunity to examine or inspect actual goods received prior to purchase, on delivery they are entitled to inspect. If good do not meet ‘type’ or ‘quality’ reasonably expected from agreement or if do not conform to specification in terms of a special order, consumer can refuse delivery/receive full refund/ and cancel without penalty. Supplier is liable for return costs.
Good do not meet particular purpose. S55(3) 10 days after receiving goods consumer can return the goods if it is not suitable for the particular purpose, cancel without penalty, supplier liable for return costs. Not entitled to return if public regulation prohibits or goods have been disassesmbled, altered, added to or combined with other goods and property.
Implied warranty of quality. S56 all goods sold are sold with an implied warranty of quality that cannot be contracted out of or revoked, Warranty gives consumer right to receive goods that are reasonably suitable for purpose intended to be used for, are of good quality, free of defects and will be durable and usable for a reasonable period of time. If goods do not comply up to 6 months return or get goods replaced or get goods repaired. Without penality at supplier’s cost.
ECT: consumer provisions will trump CPA. Online purchases. Reasons for return 1-3 do not apply if ECT Act provisions apply to the transaction. Instead of these right of return consumers have: a general right to return (cooling off period); for 7 days after delivery for any reason without penalty but consumer liable for costs of return.
4 instances when one can return goods under CPA:
Direct marketing cooling-off period: s16 5 days after receiving, consumer can return/cancel entire contract without penalty/and receive a full refund. Consumer pays costs to return goods
Goods which have not been seen before purchase: s20 (read with s19) no opportunity to examine or inspect actual goods received prior to purchase, on delivery they are entitled to inspect. If good do not meet ‘type’ or ‘quality’ reasonably expected from agreement or if do not conform to specification in terms of a special order, consumer can refuse delivery/receive full refund/ and cancel without penalty. Supplier is liable for return costs.
Good do not meet particular purpose. S55(3) 10 days after receiving goods consumer can return the goods if it is not suitable for the particular purpose, cancel without penalty, supplier liable for return costs. Not entitled to return if public regulation prohibits or goods have been disassesmbled, altered, added to or combined with other goods and property.
Implied warranty of quality. S56 all goods sold are sold with an implied warranty of quality that cannot be contracted out of or revoked, Warranty gives consumer right to receive goods that are reasonably suitable for purpose intended to be used for, are of good quality, free of defects and will be durable and usable for a reasonable period of time. If goods do not comply up to 6 months return or get goods replaced or get goods repaired. Without penality at supplier’s cost.
ECT: consumer provisions will trump CPA. Online purchases. Reasons for return 1-3 do not apply if ECT Act provisions apply to the transaction. Instead of these right of return consumers have: a general right to return (cooling off period); for 7 days after delivery for any reason without penalty but consumer liable for costs of return.
4 instances when one can return goods under CPA:
Direct marketing cooling-off period: s16 5 days after receiving, consumer can return/cancel entire contract without penalty/and receive a full refund. Consumer pays costs to return goods
Goods which have not been seen before purchase: s20 (read with s19) no opportunity to examine or inspect actual goods received prior to purchase, on delivery they are entitled to inspect. If good do not meet ‘type’ or ‘quality’ reasonably expected from agreement or if do not conform to specification in terms of a special order, consumer can refuse delivery/receive full refund/ and cancel without penalty. Supplier is liable for return costs.
Good do not meet particular purpose. S55(3) 10 days after receiving goods consumer can return the goods if it is not suitable for the particular purpose, cancel without penalty, supplier liable for return costs. Not entitled to return if public regulation prohibits or goods have been disassesmbled, altered, added to or combined with other goods and property.
Implied warranty of quality. S56 all goods sold are sold with an implied warranty of quality that cannot be contracted out of or revoked, Warranty gives consumer right to receive goods that are reasonably suitable for purpose intended to be used for, are of good quality, free of defects and will be durable and usable for a reasonable period of time. If goods do not comply up to 6 months return or get goods replaced or get goods repaired. Without penality at supplier’s cost.
ECT: consumer provisions will trump CPA. Online purchases. Reasons for return 1-3 do not apply if ECT Act provisions apply to the transaction. Instead of these right of return consumers have: a general right to return (cooling off period); for 7 days after delivery for any reason without penalty but consumer liable for costs of return.
4 instances when one can return goods under CPA:
Direct marketing cooling-off period: s16 5 days after receiving, consumer can return/cancel entire contract without penalty/and receive a full refund. Consumer pays costs to return goods
Goods which have not been seen before purchase: s20 (read with s19) no opportunity to examine or inspect actual goods received prior to purchase, on delivery they are entitled to inspect. If good do not meet ‘type’ or ‘quality’ reasonably expected from agreement or if do not conform to specification in terms of a special order, consumer can refuse delivery/receive full refund/ and cancel without penalty. Supplier is liable for return costs.
Good do not meet particular purpose. S55(3) 10 days after receiving goods consumer can return the goods if it is not suitable for the particular purpose, cancel without penalty, supplier liable for return costs. Not entitled to return if public regulation prohibits or goods have been disassesmbled, altered, added to or combined with other goods and property.
Implied warranty of quality. S56 all goods sold are sold with an implied warranty of quality that cannot be contracted out of or revoked, Warranty gives consumer right to receive goods that are reasonably suitable for purpose intended to be used for, are of good quality, free of defects and will be durable and usable for a reasonable period of time. If goods do not comply up to 6 months return or get goods replaced or get goods repaired. Without penality at supplier’s cost.
ECT: consumer provisions will trump CPA. Online purchases. Reasons for return 1-3 do not apply if ECT Act provisions apply to the transaction. Instead of these right of return consumers have: a general right to return (cooling off period); for 7 days after delivery for any reason without penalty but consumer liable for costs of return.
4 instances when one can return goods under CPA:
Direct marketing cooling-off period: s16 5 days after receiving, consumer can return/cancel entire contract without penalty/and receive a full refund. Consumer pays costs to return goods
Goods which have not been seen before purchase: s20 (read with s19) no opportunity to examine or inspect actual goods received prior to purchase, on delivery they are entitled to inspect. If good do not meet ‘type’ or ‘quality’ reasonably expected from agreement or if do not conform to specification in terms of a special order, consumer can refuse delivery/receive full refund/ and cancel without penalty. Supplier is liable for return costs.
Good do not meet particular purpose. S55(3) 10 days after receiving goods consumer can return the goods if it is not suitable for the particular purpose, cancel without penalty, supplier liable for return costs. Not entitled to return if public regulation prohibits or goods have been disassesmbled, altered, added to or combined with other goods and property.
Implied warranty of quality. S56 all goods sold are sold with an implied warranty of quality that cannot be contracted out of or revoked, Warranty gives consumer right to receive goods that are reasonably suitable for purpose intended to be used for, are of good quality, free of defects and will be durable and usable for a reasonable period of time. If goods do not comply up to 6 months return or get goods replaced or get goods repaired. Without penality at supplier’s cost.
ECT: consumer provisions will trump CPA. Online purchases. Reasons for return 1-3 do not apply if ECT Act provisions apply to the transaction. Instead of these right of return consumers have: a general right to return (cooling off period); for 7 days after delivery for any reason without penalty but consumer liable for costs of return.
4 instances when one can return goods under CPA:
Direct marketing cooling-off period: s16 5 days after receiving, consumer can return/cancel entire contract without penalty/and receive a full refund. Consumer pays costs to return goods
Goods which have not been seen before purchase: s20 (read with s19) no opportunity to examine or inspect actual goods received prior to purchase, on delivery they are entitled to inspect. If good do not meet ‘type’ or ‘quality’ reasonably expected from agreement or if do not conform to specification in terms of a special order, consumer can refuse delivery/receive full refund/ and cancel without penalty. Supplier is liable for return costs.
Good do not meet particular purpose. S55(3) 10 days after receiving goods consumer can return the goods if it is not suitable for the particular purpose, cancel without penalty, supplier liable for return costs. Not entitled to return if public regulation prohibits or goods have been disassesmbled, altered, added to or combined with other goods and property.
Implied warranty of quality. S56 all goods sold are sold with an implied warranty of quality that cannot be contracted out of or revoked, Warranty gives consumer right to receive goods that are reasonably suitable for purpose intended to be used for, are of good quality, free of defects and will be durable and usable for a reasonable period of time. If goods do not comply up to 6 months return or get goods replaced or get goods repaired. Without penality at supplier’s cost.
ECT: consumer provisions will trump CPA. Online purchases. Reasons for return 1-3 do not apply if ECT Act provisions apply to the transaction. Instead of these right of return consumers have: a general right to return (cooling off period); for 7 days after delivery for any reason without penalty but consumer liable for costs of return.
4 instances when one can return goods under CPA:
Direct marketing cooling-off period: s16 5 days after receiving, consumer can return/cancel entire contract without penalty/and receive a full refund. Consumer pays costs to return goods
Goods which have not been seen before purchase: s20 (read with s19) no opportunity to examine or inspect actual goods received prior to purchase, on delivery they are entitled to inspect. If good do not meet ‘type’ or ‘quality’ reasonably expected from agreement or if do not conform to specification in terms of a special order, consumer can refuse delivery/receive full refund/ and cancel without penalty. Supplier is liable for return costs.
Good do not meet particular purpose. S55(3) 10 days after receiving goods consumer can return the goods if it is not suitable for the particular purpose, cancel without penalty, supplier liable for return costs. Not entitled to return if public regulation prohibits or goods have been disassesmbled, altered, added to or combined with other goods and property.
Implied warranty of quality. S56 all goods sold are sold with an implied warranty of quality that cannot be contracted out of or revoked, Warranty gives consumer right to receive goods that are reasonably suitable for purpose intended to be used for, are of good quality, free of defects and will be durable and usable for a reasonable period of time. If goods do not comply up to 6 months return or get goods replaced or get goods repaired. Without penality at supplier’s cost.
ECT: consumer provisions will trump CPA. Online purchases. Reasons for return 1-3 do not apply if ECT Act provisions apply to the transaction. Instead of these right of return consumers have: a general right to return (cooling off period); for 7 days after delivery for any reason without penalty but consumer liable for costs of return.
4 instances when one can return goods under CPA:
Direct marketing cooling-off period: s16 5 days after receiving, consumer can return/cancel entire contract without penalty/and receive a full refund. Consumer pays costs to return goods
Goods which have not been seen before purchase: s20 (read with s19) no opportunity to examine or inspect actual goods received prior to purchase, on delivery they are entitled to inspect. If good do not meet ‘type’ or ‘quality’ reasonably expected from agreement or if do not conform to specification in terms of a special order, consumer can refuse delivery/receive full refund/ and cancel without penalty. Supplier is liable for return costs.
Good do not meet particular purpose. S55(3) 10 days after receiving goods consumer can return the goods if it is not suitable for the particular purpose, cancel without penalty, supplier liable for return costs. Not entitled to return if public regulation prohibits or goods have been disassesmbled, altered, added to or combined with other goods and property.
Implied warranty of quality. S56 all goods sold are sold with an implied warranty of quality that cannot be contracted out of or revoked, Warranty gives consumer right to receive goods that are reasonably suitable for purpose intended to be used for, are of good quality, free of defects and will be durable and usable for a reasonable period of time. If goods do not comply up to 6 months return or get goods replaced or get goods repaired. Without penality at supplier’s cost.
ECT: consumer provisions will trump CPA. Online purchases. Reasons for return 1-3 do not apply if ECT Act provisions apply to the transaction. Instead of these right of return consumers have: a general right to return (cooling off period); for 7 days after delivery for any reason without penalty but consumer liable for costs of return.
4 instances when one can return goods under CPA:
Direct marketing cooling-off period: s16 5 days after receiving, consumer can return/cancel entire contract without penalty/and receive a full refund. Consumer pays costs to return goods
Goods which have not been seen before purchase: s20 (read with s19) no opportunity to examine or inspect actual goods received prior to purchase, on delivery they are entitled to inspect. If good do not meet ‘type’ or ‘quality’ reasonably expected from agreement or if do not conform to specification in terms of a special order, consumer can refuse delivery/receive full refund/ and cancel without penalty. Supplier is liable for return costs.
Good do not meet particular purpose. S55(3) 10 days after receiving goods consumer can return the goods if it is not suitable for the particular purpose, cancel without penalty, supplier liable for return costs. Not entitled to return if public regulation prohibits or goods have been disassesmbled, altered, added to or combined with other goods and property.
Implied warranty of quality. S56 all goods sold are sold with an implied warranty of quality that cannot be contracted out of or revoked, Warranty gives consumer right to receive goods that are reasonably suitable for purpose intended to be used for, are of good quality, free of defects and will be durable and usable for a reasonable period of time. If goods do not comply up to 6 months return or get goods replaced or get goods repaired. Without penality at supplier’s cost.
ECT: consumer provisions will trump CPA. Online purchases. Reasons for return 1-3 do not apply if ECT Act provisions apply to the transaction. Instead of these right of return consumers have: a general right to return (cooling off period); for 7 days after delivery for any reason without penalty but consumer liable for costs of return.
Cost traps – unsolicited expenses hidden behind free offers
EC Directive on Consumer Rights effective June 2014
Ban on “cost-traps”. Online buyers to confirm understanding of price to be paid
Returning goods: reimbursement for goods not matching expectations. Extension from 7 to 14 calendar days under which consumers can withdraw from a sales contract.
Transparency: traders obliged to disclose total cost of product or service and any extra fees; extra charges for paying by credit card will not be allowed; bans pre-ticked boxes on additional services
Online search: increasing number of ads and paid linkes in search result pages. More complicated to access best options and most competitive prices as Google drives viewers to sponsored services.
Cost traps – unsolicited expenses hidden behind free offers
EC Directive on Consumer Rights effective June 2014
Ban on “cost-traps”. Online buyers to confirm understanding of price to be paid
Returning goods: reimbursement for goods not matching expectations. Extension from 7 to 14 calendar days under which consumers can withdraw from a sales contract.
Transparency: traders obliged to disclose total cost of product or service and any extra fees; extra charges for paying by credit card will not be allowed; bans pre-ticked boxes on additional services
Online search: increasing number of ads and paid linkes in search result pages. More complicated to access best options and most competitive prices as Google drives viewers to sponsored services.
31-3-2011
Pretoria -
Mr Dlamini bought a second hand car in terms of a hire-purchase agreement with Standard Bank.
Within days the vehicle stopped working and Mr Dlamini returned the vehicle.
He unfortunately did not follow the return procedure set out in the credit agreement which resulted in great financial loss.
Mr Dlamini held that he did not know that he had to notify the bank (in addition to the dealership) in order for the cancellation to be valid. Mr Dlamini did not understand English and is functionally illiterate.
The entire agreement was declared unlawful because it was not in plain language, to the extent that Mr Dlamini was not informed of the material terms of the agreement.