The document is a presentation about constructive dismissal given by Karen McClellan. It discusses what constitutes constructive dismissal under employment law, including unilateral changes to employment conditions that fundamentally breach the employment contract. It provides examples of changes that could trigger constructive dismissal, such as reductions in pay or demotions. It also covers an employee's options if they believe they have been constructively dismissed, such as accepting the changes, quitting their job, or working under protest while pursuing legal remedies.
The first of its kind, this seminar is held to provide participants with information and knowledge regarding a constructive dismissal where employee resigns as a result of the employer creating a hostile work environment.
The first of its kind, this seminar is held to provide participants with the knowledge and skills to effectively identify common workplace misconduct i.e. minor or major misconduct. It will also share the best approach in undertaking appropriate disciplinary actions, ensuring its compliance with the Employment Practices.
Complaints are different from grievances in one way in human resource management. In this presentation, both are compared and contrasted. Moreover, the process of grievance is simply explained.
Authorized causes: Valid grounds for downsizing the workforce. The Philippine Labor Code allows the employer to downsize its workforce based on authorized causes: installation of labor-saving devices, redundancy, retrenchment, closing of business, and disease. Authorized cause is part of substantive due process in Philippine Labor Law.
The first of its kind, this seminar is held to provide participants with information and knowledge regarding a constructive dismissal where employee resigns as a result of the employer creating a hostile work environment.
The first of its kind, this seminar is held to provide participants with the knowledge and skills to effectively identify common workplace misconduct i.e. minor or major misconduct. It will also share the best approach in undertaking appropriate disciplinary actions, ensuring its compliance with the Employment Practices.
Complaints are different from grievances in one way in human resource management. In this presentation, both are compared and contrasted. Moreover, the process of grievance is simply explained.
Authorized causes: Valid grounds for downsizing the workforce. The Philippine Labor Code allows the employer to downsize its workforce based on authorized causes: installation of labor-saving devices, redundancy, retrenchment, closing of business, and disease. Authorized cause is part of substantive due process in Philippine Labor Law.
Fixed-Term Employees: Agreed Period of Employment. While the Philippine Labor Code does not enlist fixed-term employment, it has been recognized via jurisprudence in the case of Brent School v. Zamora.
This is a short PPT. It contains the provisions of Unfair Labour Practices and its preventions. It comes under the Industrial Disputes Act. Provisions are complying with relevant case laws. This PPT fulfilling all conditions of a standard PPT.
The first of its kind, this seminar is held to provide participants with the knowledge and skills to effectively manage the documentation and processes for employees with prolonged illness or employees with inability to work due to occupational hazards, leading to medical boarding out.
Illegal Dismissal: Consequences for No Due Process. Philippine Labor Law emphasizes the importance of observing due process in case of employee termination. If due process is not observed, the employer could be held liable for illegal dismissal which carry the following consequences: full backwages, reinstatement, separation pay, moral damages, exemplary damages, nominal damages, attorney's fees, joint and solidary liability.
The LABOR CODE made EASY (by Atty. PoL Sangalang)PoL Sangalang
The LABOR CODE made EASY (by Atty. Apollo X.C.S. Sangalang).
This is the slide presentation of Atty. PoL Sangalang in his talk at the event "LAW AND ORDER: Enhancing Knowledge On The Labor Code Of The Philippines" organized by the Thomasian Junior Association for People Management of the University of Sto. Tomas - Human Resources Development Management (UST-HRDM) on September 20, 2013 at the Albertus Magnus (Education) Auditorium, UST Campus, Manila.
Labor Code: Unfair labor practices are violations of the constitutional rights of workers and employees to self-organization. These illegal practices are considered inimical to the legitimate interests of both labor and management. These unfair practices are likewise prejudicial to the labor and management’s right to bargain collectively, and otherwise deal with each other in an atmosphere of freedom and mutual respect. These practices disrupt industrial peace and hinder the promotion of healthy and stable labor-management relations.
The Department of Labor and Employment clarified and modified the rules and regulations on just causes and authorized causes - resulting in stricter implementation of due process. Labor Law compliance is required for valid termination. Non-compliance may result in liabilities, including illegal dismissal.
Dear Seniors & Friends,
Sharing the updated PPT on "Provident Fund & MP Act 1952" of India. Kindly have a look on the Same & Share your valuable feedback & suggestion. If you found any mistake kindly update me for the modification the same.
Regards,
Anshu Shekhar Singh
Mob: 9999 844 355
Redundancy, Retrenchment and SeparationlegalPadmin
Speech by K.Somasundram, Assistant Secretary from MTUC, given in Labour Law Seminar held by Legal Plus Sdn. Bhd (www.legalplus.com.my) on Apr 10, 2015.
Fixed-Term Employees: Agreed Period of Employment. While the Philippine Labor Code does not enlist fixed-term employment, it has been recognized via jurisprudence in the case of Brent School v. Zamora.
This is a short PPT. It contains the provisions of Unfair Labour Practices and its preventions. It comes under the Industrial Disputes Act. Provisions are complying with relevant case laws. This PPT fulfilling all conditions of a standard PPT.
The first of its kind, this seminar is held to provide participants with the knowledge and skills to effectively manage the documentation and processes for employees with prolonged illness or employees with inability to work due to occupational hazards, leading to medical boarding out.
Illegal Dismissal: Consequences for No Due Process. Philippine Labor Law emphasizes the importance of observing due process in case of employee termination. If due process is not observed, the employer could be held liable for illegal dismissal which carry the following consequences: full backwages, reinstatement, separation pay, moral damages, exemplary damages, nominal damages, attorney's fees, joint and solidary liability.
The LABOR CODE made EASY (by Atty. PoL Sangalang)PoL Sangalang
The LABOR CODE made EASY (by Atty. Apollo X.C.S. Sangalang).
This is the slide presentation of Atty. PoL Sangalang in his talk at the event "LAW AND ORDER: Enhancing Knowledge On The Labor Code Of The Philippines" organized by the Thomasian Junior Association for People Management of the University of Sto. Tomas - Human Resources Development Management (UST-HRDM) on September 20, 2013 at the Albertus Magnus (Education) Auditorium, UST Campus, Manila.
Labor Code: Unfair labor practices are violations of the constitutional rights of workers and employees to self-organization. These illegal practices are considered inimical to the legitimate interests of both labor and management. These unfair practices are likewise prejudicial to the labor and management’s right to bargain collectively, and otherwise deal with each other in an atmosphere of freedom and mutual respect. These practices disrupt industrial peace and hinder the promotion of healthy and stable labor-management relations.
The Department of Labor and Employment clarified and modified the rules and regulations on just causes and authorized causes - resulting in stricter implementation of due process. Labor Law compliance is required for valid termination. Non-compliance may result in liabilities, including illegal dismissal.
Dear Seniors & Friends,
Sharing the updated PPT on "Provident Fund & MP Act 1952" of India. Kindly have a look on the Same & Share your valuable feedback & suggestion. If you found any mistake kindly update me for the modification the same.
Regards,
Anshu Shekhar Singh
Mob: 9999 844 355
Redundancy, Retrenchment and SeparationlegalPadmin
Speech by K.Somasundram, Assistant Secretary from MTUC, given in Labour Law Seminar held by Legal Plus Sdn. Bhd (www.legalplus.com.my) on Apr 10, 2015.
In this very informative webinar, Helen Gardiner discusses Capability Dismissals.
The webinar covers:
* Capability
* A Fair Procedure
* Setting the Standard
* Dismissing Fairly
* Sickness and Capability
* The Procedure for Claiming
This slideshow contains the first 14 minutes of the webinar recording. You can also subscribe to the Shorebird Free Webinars here: http://bit.ly/webinarsubscribe
Learn about how unemployment insurance works in the state of Utah by the Utah Department of Workforce Services. For more information, please visit http://jobs.utah.gov
How Can Unemployment Insurance Can Help YouNewHorizon.Org
Are you unemployed and don't enough savings for yur day to day expenses? Don't worry because unemployment insurance can help you! Find out more about it here http://www.newhorizon.org/credit-info/unemployment-insurance-can-help/
Looking for personal loans for bad credit? Apply here http://www.newhorizon.org/Info/personaloans.htm
- Job Quality
- Payroll taxation
- Skills development and training
- Job Creation
- Exports
- Retail sectors
- Technological advances
- Youth unemployment
- Career management and development
- Government programs
- International Trade
Powerpoint presentation to the 2011 annual conference of American Agents Alliance (Palm Springs, CA; September 29-30). Presentation by Steve L. Simas, Simas & Associates, Ltd.
Contractor or Employee? Exempt or Non-Exempt? Understanding the Distinctions ...ComplyRight, Inc.
A handful of high-profile cases -- and increased attention by the IRS and Department of Labor – has put worker classification in the spotlight. Now, more than ever, employers must be crystal clear on the differences between an employee and independent contractor, as well as exempt vs. non-exempt status.
In either case, misclassifying workers is a risk your business can’t afford to take. Federal and state agents are monitoring the situation more closely and cracking down with bigger fines and penalties. At the same time, wage and hour lawsuits are on the rise, with many “salaried” employees recognizing they are non-exempt in the eyes of the law -- and therefore owed overtime.
Protect yourself from costly misclassification mistakes and potential legal issues. Attend this timely webinar to learn:
- Factors that define the worker relationship, according to the IRS and Department of Labor
- Warning signs that your contractor is actually an employee under the law
- What determines exempt vs. non-exempt status (Hint: Job title has nothing to do with it.)
- Steps to take if a worker is misclassified
Mandatory Employee Leave: An In-Depth Analysis of State and Local LawsComplyRight, Inc.
Did you know that numerous states and cities have passed laws granting leave for workers to address certain health and family-related issues? And that many local governments mandate paid time off for being sick? Requiring employers to provide time off for employees is a growing trend, and it shows no signs of slowing down.
Mainly due to inaction at the federal level, many states and local governments have stepped up to grant employees time off in specific circumstances. These laws vary greatly from how much leave is allowed, how the time off is accrued, when employees can begin to use leave, and if the time can be carried over from year to year.
Employing staff is one of the most important things a business does. Getting the right people and having a common understanding of what is expected from the start is essential for the whole employment relationship. How that relationship is established at the beginning is critical, particularly if it is necessary to part ways with the employee later on.
Workshop was conducted at Coleman Greig Lawyers on 22 June 2017. http://www.colemangreig.com.au/Event-250-Employment-Contracts-and-Policies.aspx
“A process through which something becomes different.” This is the dictionary definition. Organisational change refers to the alteration in technology, structure, method, people, or their behaviour. Organizational change can be defined as the alteration in structure, technology or people in an organization or behavior by an organization. Here we need to note that change in organizational culture is different from change in an organization. A new method or style or new rule is implemented here.
Do you find the TUPE Regulations a minefield?
Do you despair at the thought of having to grapple with potential TUPE issues in your organisation?
This recorded webinar will help guide you through the TUPE Legislation leaving you with a clearer understanding of:
The situations where TUPE will apply
The main principles and obligations arising from TUPE
The automatic transfer principle
Obligations to inform and consult
Potential liability and claims that an organisation could face for failing to comply with the TUPE legislation
This webinar will provide practical and straightforward advice and tips to help you understand TUPE legislation and what this means for your business. It will appeal to HR Management and Business Owners and there will be time at the end for questions. Please use the prompt when registering if you have a particular question you would like Caroline to answer.
Changes on the Horizon: The DOL's Proposed Rules Regarding Independent Contra...Jim Cowan
This Presentation covers the DOL's new Proposed Rules. Topics covered include:
• The DOL Adopting more Restrictive Tests for Independent Contractor
• The Proposed Changes to DOL White Collar Exempt Status Regulations
• The Computer Professionals Exemption Decision Tree
• The Salary Basis Test, Permitted Salary Deductions
• The Exceptions from "No Pay-Docking" Rule
• Examples & Effects of Improper Deductions
• Payroll Practices that Do Not Violate the Salary Basis Test
• Additional Compensation.
DISCLAIMER:
By using this site and accessing the information presented by CowanPerry, PC., you understand that there is no attorney client relationship between you and CowanPerry, PC. The site and information contained therein should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.
The information contained on this site is summary in nature and does not include all conditions, limitations, or exceptions that may be applicable to a particular situation. Every effort has been made to present current information without inaccuracies; however, errors, additions, deletions, and changes in the laws or procedures may occur and could make the information out of date or inaccurate. CowanPerry, PC does not assume any liability whatsoever for the "up-to-dateness", accuracy and completeness of the information.
Recorded on November 12, 2013 - This webinar in the Family Law Education for Women (FLEW) series takes a look at the Family Court process, and reviews which court to go to depending on your family law issue, some common court terms, the steps leading up to trial, and how to work with your lawyer outside and inside the courtroom. METRAC’s Legal Director is joined by practicing family law lawyer, Jenna Beaton, from the law firm Martha McCarthy & Company.
October 2013 - Public legal education (PLE) is increasingly delivered online. This webinar will look at how to leverage a number of free or low-cost online tools (including Google Analytics and iPerceptions surveys) to acquire data to measure your impact and align with your key performance indicators or KPIs.
Other tools that will be discussed include online user testing tools and what metrics matter when it comes social media evaluation.
Recorded on September 26, 2013 - This webinar, presented by the ODSP Action Coalition, describes recent updates and changes to the Ontario Disability Support Program (ODSP). It is a follow-up to the Coalition's first webinar ODSP: Know Your Benefits. It is recommended that you watch ODSP: Know Your Benefits first.
Watch this webinar at:
http://yourlegalrights.on.ca/webinar/odsp-know-your-benefits-rights-and-responsibilities
Recorded on September 26, 2013 - This webinar, intended for community workers, gives information on maximizing income and benefits for Ontario Disability Support Plan (ODSP) recipients approaching 65. Topics covered include ODSP after 65, senior's pensions and rent subsidies, Canada Pension Plan (CPP) early retirement benefits, income fluctuations, and Old Age Security (OAS) .
Watch at:
http://yourlegalrights.on.ca/webinar/odsp-and-aging
Recorded on September 24, 2013 - This webinar in the Family Law Education for Women (FLEW) series is the second of two discussions about the Children's Aid Society geared toward the rights of young women.
In this discussion, lawyer Seema Jain, of Jain Family Law and Mediation, discusses what teenage mothers should know if the CAS has concerns about the safety of their child(ren), in conversation with METRAC’s Legal Director, Tamar Witelson.
Watch the webinar at:
http://yourlegalrights.on.ca/webinar/teenage-mothers-and-childrens-aid-society-what-young-mothers-should-know-about-child-protect
September 23, 2013 at 12:00 E.S.T. - This webinar in the Family Law Education for Women (FLEW) series is the first of two discussions about the Children's Aid Society geared toward the rights of young women. This webinar looks at the child protection process, focussing on youth rights and realities when they are the person that the CAS is concerned may be in need of protection.
In this discussion, lawyer Seema Jain, of Jain Family Law and Mediation, discusses what young people should know about being involved in the child protection process, in conversation with METRAC’s Legal Director, Tamar Witelson.
Watch this webinar at:
http://yourlegalrights.on.ca/webinar/when-childrens-aid-society-gets-involved-what-can-childyouth-expect
Recorded on July 4, 2013 - The unqualified right of Convention Refugees to remain in Canada has been eroded by recent changes to the law. This webinar examines cessation and vacation proceedings where the Minister of Immigration applies to remove a person's Protected Person status. It highlights the significance of the changes to the law and the importance of Convention Refugees and Permanent Residents applying for citizenship as soon as possible. Situations that could trigger cessation or vacation proceedings, as well as ways that service providers can offer support during the citizenship process, will also be covered.
Watch this webinar at:
http://yourlegalrights.on.ca/webinar/threats-convention-refugee-and-permanent-resident-status
Recorded on June 27, 2013 - Under changes to the refugee and immigration system, a Humanitarian and Compassionate application (H&C) and a refugee claim cannot be made at the same time. In fact, if your refugee claim fails, in most cases you are barred from making an H&C application for one year. This webinar, intended for community workers, will provide legal information to highlight some of the factors to be considered when this important strategic decision is made, and offers hypothetical scenarios for discussion.
For more information or to watch an archived recording of this webinar visit:http://yourlegalrights.on.ca/webinar/refugee-claim-or-hc
Recorded on June 13, 2013. - This webinar, intended for community workers, presents options for workers who have been fired or laid off. It looks at when an employer can fire an employee, what a worker can do if they are wrongfully dismissed, and what the Courts or the Ministry of Labour look for when dealing with dismissal cases.
Watch an archived recording of this webinar and download copies of presentation materials at
http://yourlegalrights.on.ca/webinar/wrongful-dismissal
Recorded on May 30, 2013 - This webinar, intended for community workers, gives an overview of workers' rights under the Employment Standards Act, including overtime pay, illegal deductions, termination pay, severance pay, and public holiday pay. It covers steps a worker can take if the employer violates these standards.
Watch an archived recording of this webinar and download copies of presentation materials at
http://yourlegalrights.on.ca/webinar/employment-standards-ontario-workers
Recorded on March 28, 2013 - In the wake of recent changes to the refugee determination process, this webinar in the Family Law Education for Women (FLEW) series looks at the first step in making a refugee claim, the new Basis of Claim (BOC) form, introduced in December 2012. METRAC’s Legal Director Tamar Witelson is joined by lawyer and former Immigration and Refugee Board adjudicator Sudabeh Mashkuri, to talk about how an adjudicator will consider information in the BOC form, and some issues relevant to women exposed to violence who are making a refugee claim.
This webinar is produced by METRAC as part of the Family Law Education for Women (FLEW) series in partnership with CLEO.
Watch an archived recording of this webinar and download copies of presentation materials at:
http://yourlegalrights.on.ca/webinar/new-basis-claim-form-boc-refugee-claims
Recorded on March 6, 2013 - This webinar in the Family Law Education for Women (FLEW) series looks at the Ontario rules for division of family property, for married and co-habiting couples following relationship breakdown. Topics include the equalization payment, the matrimonial home, and issues for surviving spouses. Presenters are Tamar Witelson, Legal Director at The Metropolitan Action Committee on Violence Against Women and Children (METRAC) and Robert Halpern, partner and head of the Family Law Group at the law firm Torkin Manes.
This webinar is produced by METRAC as part of the Family Law Education for Women (FLEW) series in partnership with CLEO.
Watch an archived recording of this webinar and download copies of presentation materials at:
http://yourlegalrights.on.ca/webinar/property-rights-and-obligations-married-and-co-habiting-partners-updated-march-2013
Recorded on February 28, 2013 at 12:00 p.m. EST - This webinar in the Family Law Education for Women (FLEW) series is the second of two discussions about the Children's Aid Society. This webinar looks at the child protection process from the point of view of parents who are dealing with the CAS. In this discussion, lawyer Seema Jain of Jain Family Law and Mediation discusses what parents should know before, during, and after a child protection hearing, in conversation with METRAC's Legal Director, Tamar Witelson.
Watch an archived recording of this webinar and download copies of presentation materials at:
http://yourlegalrights.on.ca/webinar/dealing-childrens-aid-society-what-parents-should-know
Recorded on February 21, 2013 - In this webinar in the series on Family Law Education for Women (FLEW), the V/WAP program to support victims and witnesses going through the criminal court process is discussed. Looking at how women complainants of sexual assault and domestic violence may receive support as the victim or witness in the trial process, Carol Nicholson, a Victim/Witness Support Worker from Peel Region joins Tamar Witelson, Legal Director of the Metropolitan Action Committee on Violence Against Women and Children (METRAC).
This webinar is produced by METRAC as part of the Family Law Education for Women (FLEW) series in partnership with CLEO.
An archived version of this webinar along with copies of presentation materials are available at:
http://yourlegalrights.on.ca/webinar/victimwitness-assistance-program-support-women-victims-violent-crime
Recorded on Feb 14, 2013 - This webinar from the ODSP Action Coalition will provide an overview of the Ontario Disability Support Program (ODSP) and cover applying for ODSP, ODSP rates, income, earnings, assets & changes, the different types of ODSP Benefits, appeals and tips and strategies for navigating the system.
Please note before viewing this webinar that after it was recorded, The Ministry of Community and Social Services made changes to ODSP and OW, effective September 1, 2013. The presentation materials below under related files reflect these changes.
To watch this webinar visit:
http://yourlegalrights.on.ca/webinar/ontario-disability-support-program-odsp-know-your-benefits
Recorded on January 23, 2013 - This webinar in the Family Law Education for Women (FLEW) series covers the basics of how the Children's Aid Society (CAS) system works, to give service providers and families an understanding of how they may take part in the process. For this discussion, METRAC's Legal Director, Tamar Witelson, is joined by Vicky Lowrey, a Senior Service Manager at the Children's Aid Society of Peel Region.
Watch the webinar at:
http://yourlegalrights.on.ca/webinar/understanding-childrens-aid-society-process-inside
Recorded on December 19, 2012 - This webinar, presented in partnership by the Human Rights Legal Support Centre and Hamilton Community Legal Clinic, provides an overview of the Human Rights Code, highlighting the grounds and social areas which the Code applies to, exceptions to the Code, and remedies available under the Code. It acquaints listeners with the Human Rights System in Ontario and describes the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario's process.
Watch this webinar at:
http://yourlegalrights.on.ca/webinar/discrimination-against-law-primer-human-rights-law-ontario
Re-recorded on December 20, 2012 - This webinar in the Family Law Education for Women (FLEW) series is about the new immigration program called Conditional Permanent Residence, which went into effect on October 25, 2012. We will talk about the program from the perspective of the potentially negative impact it will have on women who come to Canada as sponsored spouses or partners. METRAC's Legal Director, Tamar Witelson, discusses the issues with Raoul Boulakia, a certified Immigration and Refugee Law specialist.
Watch the webinar at:
http://yourlegalrights.on.ca/webinar/Conditional-Permanent-Residence-What-a-Sponsored-Spouse-Needs-to-Know
Recorded on November 22, 2012 - This webinar in the Family Law Education for Women (FLEW) series looks at a variety of ways to settle issues about children, property, and support, when a woman ends the relationship with her partner. What are the pros and cons of mediation, arbitration, and court, especially when there is or was abuse in the family? METRAC's Legal Director, Tamar Witelson, discusses the issues with Victoria Starr, a specialist in family law practice, and founder of Starr Family Law. Watch the webinar at:
http://yourlegalrights.on.ca/webinar/Conflict-Court-or-Another-Way-Different-Ways-of-Resolving-a-Family-Dispute
More from Community Legal Education Ontario (CLEO) (20)
Conflict, Court, or Another Way? Different Ways of Resolving a Family Dispute
Constructive Dismissal
1. To watch & listen to this presentation as a webinar visit CLEONet www.cleonet.ca CLEONet is a web site of legal information for community workers and advocates who work with low-income and disadvantaged communities in Ontario.
2. About our presenter… Karen McClellan leads the JUSTICE@work project at the Community Legal Clinic – Simcoe, Haliburton, Kawartha Lakes. As a Staff Lawyer, Karen practices employment and human rights law, with a focus on low-income and vulnerable workers. Her clients include migrant farm workers and live-in caregivers. She has presented on the legal challenges facing workers to community groups, regional clinic training conferences, and provincial and national symposiums. She also served on of the Ontario Bar Association Taskforce on Wrongful Dismissal.
3. Constructive dismissal Harassment, bullying and discrimination at Work March 26, 2010 By Karen McClellan JUSTICE@work Lawyer JUSTICE @ work
51. This webinar was brought to you by CLEONet For more information visit the Employment and Work section of CLEONet at www.cleonet.ca For more legal information webinars visit: http://www.cleonet.ca/legal_education_webinars
Editor's Notes
What is constructive dismissal? An employment agreement (written or verbal) cannot be changed by the Employer or Employee without agreement by both parties to the change. Most Common form of constructive dismissal : Employer changes the conditions of employment
However not every change results in constructive dismissal. In order for the change to trigger constructive dismissal, it must be shown that: The Change is: NEW: Was not contemplated at the time of entering into the contract of employment (written or verbal); and MAJOR: Results in a major breach of contract and repudiates the contract; and NOT ACCEPTED: You did not condone or accept the change
However not every change results in constructive dismissal. In order for the change to trigger constructive dismissal, it must be shown that: The Change is: NEW: Was not contemplated at the time of entering into the contract of employment (written or verbal); and MAJOR: Results in a major breach of contract and repudiates the contract; and NOT ACCEPTED: You did not condone or accept the change
However not every change results in constructive dismissal. In order for the change to trigger constructive dismissal, it must be shown that: The Change is: NEW: Was not contemplated at the time of entering into the contract of employment (written or verbal); and MAJOR: Results in a major breach of contract and repudiates the contract; and NOT ACCEPTED: You did not condone or accept the change
However not every change results in constructive dismissal. In order for the change to trigger constructive dismissal, it must be shown that: The Change is: NEW: Was not contemplated at the time of entering into the contract of employment (written or verbal); and MAJOR: Results in a major breach of contract and repudiates the contract; and NOT ACCEPTED: You did not condone or accept the change
Was the change within the contemplation of the employer & employee when the employment relationship started? Was the change addressed in your contract? Was the change discussed at time of hiring? What is the custom of the industry? What is the company practice or policy? Were your hours set or flexible depending on need? Example of change addressed in contract/at time of hiring that will NOT constitute Con Dis Ex. Position: waitress, no written contract, at interview and on first shift – the restaurant manager indicated that they would try to provide about 25 hours / wk in shifts however the hours would fluctuate depending on how busy the restaurant was. During the summer hours would usually be more and there would be some slow times in the winter where she could expect her hours to decrease. The e’ee works for about 8 months at 25+ + hrs/wk but then in January and February her hours decrease. ***In this type of situation: the reduction in hours was expected and contemplated at the time of the employment agreement and will not give rise to constructive dismissal due to a change, i.e. decrease in hours.
Was the change within the contemplation of the employer & employee when the employment relationship started? Was the change addressed in your contract? Was the change discussed at time of hiring? What is the custom of the industry? What is the company practice or policy? Were your hours set or flexible depending on need? Example of change addressed in contract/at time of hiring that will NOT constitute Con Dis Ex. Position: waitress, no written contract, at interview and on first shift – the restaurant manager indicated that they would try to provide about 25 hours / wk in shifts however the hours would fluctuate depending on how busy the restaurant was. During the summer hours would usually be more and there would be some slow times in the winter where she could expect her hours to decrease. The e’ee works for about 8 months at 25+ + hrs/wk but then in January and February her hours decrease. ***In this type of situation: the reduction in hours was expected and contemplated at the time of the employment agreement and will not give rise to constructive dismissal due to a change, i.e. decrease in hours.
Was the change within the contemplation of the employer & employee when the employment relationship started? Was the change addressed in your contract? Was the change discussed at time of hiring? What is the custom of the industry? What is the company practice or policy? Were your hours set or flexible depending on need? Example of change addressed in contract/at time of hiring that will NOT constitute Con Dis Ex. Position: waitress, no written contract, at interview and on first shift – the restaurant manager indicated that they would try to provide about 25 hours / wk in shifts however the hours would fluctuate depending on how busy the restaurant was. During the summer hours would usually be more and there would be some slow times in the winter where she could expect her hours to decrease. The e’ee works for about 8 months at 25+ + hrs/wk but then in January and February her hours decrease. ***In this type of situation: the reduction in hours was expected and contemplated at the time of the employment agreement and will not give rise to constructive dismissal due to a change, i.e. decrease in hours.
Was the change within the contemplation of the employer & employee when the employment relationship started? Was the change addressed in your contract? Was the change discussed at time of hiring? What is the custom of the industry? What is the company practice or policy? Were your hours set or flexible depending on need? Example of change addressed in contract/at time of hiring that will NOT constitute Con Dis Ex. Position: waitress, no written contract, at interview and on first shift – the restaurant manager indicated that they would try to provide about 25 hours / wk in shifts however the hours would fluctuate depending on how busy the restaurant was. During the summer hours would usually be more and there would be some slow times in the winter where she could expect her hours to decrease. The e’ee works for about 8 months at 25+ + hrs/wk but then in January and February her hours decrease. ***In this type of situation: the reduction in hours was expected and contemplated at the time of the employment agreement and will not give rise to constructive dismissal due to a change, i.e. decrease in hours.
Was the change within the contemplation of the employer & employee when the employment relationship started? Was the change addressed in your contract? Was the change discussed at time of hiring? What is the custom of the industry? What is the company practice or policy? Were your hours set or flexible depending on need? Example of change addressed in contract/at time of hiring that will NOT constitute Con Dis Ex. Position: waitress, no written contract, at interview and on first shift – the restaurant manager indicated that they would try to provide about 25 hours / wk in shifts however the hours would fluctuate depending on how busy the restaurant was. During the summer hours would usually be more and there would be some slow times in the winter where she could expect her hours to decrease. The e’ee works for about 8 months at 25+ + hrs/wk but then in January and February her hours decrease. ***In this type of situation: the reduction in hours was expected and contemplated at the time of the employment agreement and will not give rise to constructive dismissal due to a change, i.e. decrease in hours.
Was the change within the contemplation of the employer & employee when the employment relationship started? Was the change addressed in your contract? Was the change discussed at time of hiring? What is the custom of the industry? What is the company practice or policy? Were your hours set or flexible depending on need? Example of change addressed in contract/at time of hiring that will NOT constitute Con Dis EXAMPLE - Position: waitress, no written contract, at interview and on first shift – the restaurant manager indicated that they would try to provide about 25 hours / wk in shifts however the hours would fluctuate depending on how busy the restaurant was. During the summer hours would usually be more and there would be some slow times in the winter where she could expect her hours to decrease. The e’ee works for about 8 months at 25+ + hrs/wk but then in January and February her hours decrease. ***In this type of situation: the reduction in hours was expected and contemplated at the time of the employment agreement and will not give rise to constructive dismissal due to a change, i.e. decrease in hours.
Employer is usually entitled to make changes to company policies and practices over time. However if that change is so significant as to result in a major reduction in benefits – that really formed part of the remuneration package at the time of hiring/employment agrmt – then can result in a constructive dismissal. Typical Changes or Breaches that are significant: -> Reduction in Salary/Pay -> Demotion -> Removal of Responsibilities and Core Functions -> Lay-off Where there is no express or implied term permitting lay-offs in employment agreement -> Change of Job Duties to a lower calibre/status employee is not qualified or suited for new duties -> Change in Benefits (Bonuses, Mat Leave Policy etc) Must be an integral part of compensation package Must be in breach of company policy If company policy change causes loss of benefits – may need to show that the change is below a commercially acceptable standard Basis : An employee is entitled to rely on the terms of employment and refuse to do work or accept changes imposed by the employer outside the scope of those terms TEST : Whether a reasonable person would consider that a key term of employment has been fundamentally changed.
CHANGE IS MINOR = NO BREACH Some changes will not result in constructive dismissal Basis : Employment relationships evolve over time and minor changes can be expected and not result in a fundamental breach so as to destroy the employment relationship. Examples: -Removal of secondary duties on a temporary basis -Minor change in duties due to transfer to new location but same position QUALIFICATION: Employee’s duties are not frozen & may be expected to evolve over time -A very minor change in pay -Company restructuring: lateral transfer or slight change in duties where status and pay remain same QUALIFICATION: Although some indefiniteness may be expected, the Employer should provide information requested by Employee about his/her duties, status and authority level in a company restructuring plan If you’re not sure what the changes are going to be – ASK CAUTION: whether constructive dismissal or not depends on the circumstances – seek legal advice Reassignments & Relocation No fundamental change in terms of employment Reassignment or relocation is made in good faith for business reasons The courts have recognized that an Employer has some leeway to alter duties, this is especially the case where changes are necessary for the company’s survival in tough economic times and there is no objective element of humiliation or decrease in authority/demotion Note: Employer has less discretion to make changes where Employee is hired in a “definite” capacity
Acceptance can be explicit or implicit Verbal or Written Actions You can’t wait too long to decide whether you will accept the change
The court will take an objective approach and look at all the circumstances. Objective approach: will consider information available to the employee at the time. However the feelings of the employee, for example of “losing face” may not be relevant/considered if objectively, the change is determined to be minor and/or reasonable. Factors: Was there a significant change to the employment agreement imposed by the Employer? Whether employee accepted the change Whether employer acted in good faith and fairly In some cases: -Intent of Employer: Accidental or Intentional -Whether legitimate business reasons for the change Factors: If accidental then no intention repudiate the contract. However an Employer can still be guilty of constructive dismissal even with the best of intentions.
The court will take an objective approach and look at all the circumstances. Objective approach: will consider information available to the employee at the time. However the feelings of the employee, for example of “losing face” may not be relevant/considered if objectively, the change is determined to be minor and/or reasonable. Factors: Was there a significant change to the employment agreement imposed by the Employer? Whether employee accepted the change Whether employer acted in good faith and fairly In some cases: -Intent of Employer: Accidental or Intentional -Whether legitimate business reasons for the change Factors: If accidental then no intention repudiate the contract. However an Employer can still be guilty of constructive dismissal even with the best of intentions.
The court will take an objective approach and look at all the circumstances. Objective approach: will consider information available to the employee at the time. However the feelings of the employee, for example of “losing face” may not be relevant/considered if objectively, the change is determined to be minor and/or reasonable. Factors: Was there a significant change to the employment agreement imposed by the Employer? Whether employee accepted the change Whether employer acted in good faith and fairly In some cases: -Intent of Employer: Accidental or Intentional -Whether legitimate business reasons for the change Factors: If accidental then no intention repudiate the contract. However an Employer can still be guilty of constructive dismissal even with the best of intentions.
The court will take an objective approach and look at all the circumstances. Objective approach: will consider information available to the employee at the time. However the feelings of the employee, for example of “losing face” may not be relevant/considered if objectively, the change is determined to be minor and/or reasonable. Factors: Was there a significant change to the employment agreement imposed by the Employer? Whether employee accepted the change Whether employer acted in good faith and fairly In some cases: -Intent of Employer: Accidental or Intentional -Whether legitimate business reasons for the change Factors: If accidental then no intention repudiate the contract. However an Employer can still be guilty of constructive dismissal even with the best of intentions.
The court will take an objective approach and look at all the circumstances. Objective approach: will consider information available to the employee at the time. However the feelings of the employee, for example of “losing face” may not be relevant/considered if objectively, the change is determined to be minor and/or reasonable. Factors: Was there a significant change to the employment agreement imposed by the Employer? Whether employee accepted the change Whether employer acted in good faith and fairly In some cases: -Intent of Employer: Accidental or Intentional -Whether legitimate business reasons for the change Factors: If accidental then no intention repudiate the contract. However an Employer can still be guilty of constructive dismissal even with the best of intentions.
If there is employee misconduct and the changes are a form of discipline then there may be no constructive dismissal Contract of employment allows for employer to make some changes Change is a breach but an alternate job is offered – employee may be expected to accept (if not unreasonable & no humiliation) in order to mitigate Example: poor work performance; theft etc – suspension w/out pay: if established cause then employer will not be faulted for changes that fall short of outright dismissal. However BOP on Er to establish cause… while BOP on E’ee to establish Constructive dismissal. Failure to mitigate can result in denial of damages TEST: whether the employee acted reasonably in refusing the new job
If there is employee misconduct and the changes are a form of discipline then there may be no constructive dismissal Contract of employment allows for employer to make some changes Change is a breach but an alternate job is offered – employee may be expected to accept (if not unreasonable & no humiliation) in order to mitigate Example: poor work performance; theft etc – suspension w/out pay: if established cause then employer will not be faulted for changes that fall short of outright dismissal. However BOP on Er to establish cause… while BOP on E’ee to establish Constructive dismissal. Failure to mitigate can result in denial of damages TEST: whether the employee acted reasonably in refusing the new job
If there is employee misconduct and the changes are a form of discipline then there may be no constructive dismissal Contract of employment allows for employer to make some changes Change is a breach but an alternate job is offered – employee may be expected to accept (if not unreasonable & no humiliation) in order to mitigate Example: poor work performance; theft etc – suspension w/out pay: if established cause then employer will not be faulted for changes that fall short of outright dismissal. However BOP on Er to establish cause… while BOP on E’ee to establish Constructive dismissal. Failure to mitigate can result in denial of damages TEST: whether the employee acted reasonably in refusing the new job
Summary – situations that do not support constructive dismissal Personality conflict at work (minor) Disputed performance evaluation Disciplinary actions of employer if warranted and reasonable in circumstances Slight change in hours, duties etc or a change that you accepted in writing or by continuing to work with changes Change in work conditions that was foreseeable and could be expected at the time of hiring
Written complaint to management of bullying/harassment etc If harasser is management, then review complaints mechanism //company policy on complaints, speak to Human Resources and provide a written summary of complaint. Keep copies.
Written complaint to management of bullying/harassment etc If harasser is management, then review complaints mechanism //company policy on complaints, speak to Human Resources and provide a written summary of complaint. Keep copies.
Written complaint to management of bullying/harassment etc If harasser is management, then review complaints mechanism //company policy on complaints, speak to Human Resources and provide a written summary of complaint. Keep copies.
Humiliating Treatment That undermines employee’s authority/damaging to morale That is abusive, unfair or harassing and is NOT condoned Examples: Manager persistently yells at employee in front of other staff and/or customers Boss repeatedly threatens to fire employee Continuing sexual harassment or bullying at work that has been brought to the attention of supervisors, management or the Human Resources Dept. Employer refuses to allow an employee on sick leave or disability leave to return to work despite appropriate medical documentation & reporting and makes unfounded accusations of misconduct Basis : Employer has breached a fundamental implied term of employment that it will treat the Employee with civility, decency and respect and to ensure a healthy work atmosphere TEST : Whether the conduct of the employer is such that a reasonable person should not be expected to persevere. Minor personality disagreements, singular incidents of otherwise harmonious work environment, or slight changes in duties that are reasonable, such as requiring supervisor to assist subordinate workers on the job when necessary – will not result in seriously undermining authority or be considered humiliating treatment Remember test is objective so subjective feelings may not be relevant
An employee must decide within a reasonable time (usually w/in 10 days) to: accept the change; or 2) consider the contract at an end AND QUIT -or- B) WORK UNDER PROTEST (MITIGATE) Accept the Change: If you accept the change, in writing or by your conduct (i.e. continuing to work with changes) then you have condoned the change and there is no constructive dismissal Dispute the Change & Quit An employee will generally not be considered to have failed to mitigate loss of earnings by quitting, in the following circumstances: Poisoned work environment due to harassment, humiliating and unfair treatment, or human rights discrimination Dispute the Change – Work under protest – to mitigate damages An employee may be expected to work in the changed job in order to mitigate loss of earnings (flowing from constructive dismissal) particularly in cases where there is no objective form of humiliation or loss of status/pay NOTE: an employee is expected to take steps in mitigation that a reasonable person would in the circumstances In order to determine if it is reasonable to work under changed conditions, you need to request nformation about the changes from your employer If you dispute the change but are willing to work under protest in order to mitigate your losses, you should indicate this clearly and in writing FOR ALL OF THE ABOVE – SEEK INDEPENDENT LEGAL ADVICE PRIOR TO MAKING YOUR DECISION
Dispute the Change – Work under protest – to mitigate damages An employee may be expected to work in the changed job in order to mitigate loss of earnings (flowing from constructive dismissal) particularly in cases where there is no objective form of humiliation or loss of status/pay NOTE: an employee is expected to take steps in mitigation that a reasonable person would in the circumstances In order to determine if it is reasonable to work under changed conditions, you need to request information about the changes from your employer If you dispute the change but are willing to work under protest in order to mitigate your losses, you should indicate this clearly and in writing
Mitigation earnings while working under protest of change – will be deducted from court award
The question of whether a constructive dismissal has occurred is a question of FACT. In a constructive dismissal action, the Employee must prove that a fundamental breach of the employment agreement occurred. In cases involving humiliating treatment, the employee must prove that a reasonable person would not be expected to persevere in the circumstances. The court will look at the nature of the employment relationship, as well as express or implied terms of the employment contract. Where the employee has held a number of different positions with the company, which is often the case with long term employees, the court will consider the employment relationship/agrmt based on the position held by the E’ee at the time of the last change. Similarly, although the E’ee may have consented to changes in the past – that does not mean the E’ee has to consent to the NEW change. The court will be looking at whether a fundamental change occurred to the contract or agreement, i.e. position and responsibilities of the E’ee at the time of the alleged breach.
OHSA amendments coming into effect June 15, 2010 Complaints are made to Ministry of Labour
ESA: must show forced to quit, i.e. not voluntary & cannot refuse reasonable alternate work Written complaint: be careful, do not write in the heat of the moment, sign & date – keep a copy Unless the situation is dire, then give your employer the opportunity to take corrective measures and respond to your complaint
ESA: must show forced to quit, i.e. not voluntary & cannot refuse reasonable alternate work Written complaint: be careful, do not write in the heat of the moment, sign & date – keep a copy Unless the situation is dire, then give your employer the opportunity to take corrective measures and respond to your complaint
Reprisal prohibited
Not those under federal jurisdiction & more than 5 E’ees Go over risk factors – attachment Not a substitute for calling police Not clear whether employee can make a complaint directly to the Ministry