This contains provision under Constitution of India for constitutional remedies which is provided under Article 32. It explains writ of Hebeas Corpus, Mandamus, Certiorary, and Prohibition.
The citizens of India are guaranteed certain basic fundamental rights by the state, which cannot be taken away from them except in cases of procedure established by law.
Such a guarantee is instrumental in reducing the arbitrariness of government legislation.
In the absence of fundamental rights, the citizens may not be entitled to any basic human rights.
Thus to prevent this, the constitution-makers incorporated Part III of the Indian Constitution enumerating a list of rights that is to assured by the state.
This contains provision under Constitution of India for constitutional remedies which is provided under Article 32. It explains writ of Hebeas Corpus, Mandamus, Certiorary, and Prohibition.
The citizens of India are guaranteed certain basic fundamental rights by the state, which cannot be taken away from them except in cases of procedure established by law.
Such a guarantee is instrumental in reducing the arbitrariness of government legislation.
In the absence of fundamental rights, the citizens may not be entitled to any basic human rights.
Thus to prevent this, the constitution-makers incorporated Part III of the Indian Constitution enumerating a list of rights that is to assured by the state.
A detailed presentation about types of Writs in the Constitution of India.
By: __________________
(For Law Laboratory)
Follow us on Instagram: @Law_Laboratory
Website: www.lawlaboratory.in
This PowerPoint presentation is a brief about the Writ of Mandamus. The PPt covers the crux of the writ of Mandamus, its types, its advantages, who and against whom it can be filed, and more. This presentation on writ of Mandamus is covered under Administrative Law
In this PPT various kinds of Writs have been discussed along with the relevant case laws. Also, relevant article such as Art 32 and Art 226 of the Indian Constitution have been explained.
Types of writ and difference between public interest litigation and private inteAmulya Arcania Nenlore
types of writ under indian constitution
difference between public interest litigation and private interest litigation-mandamus,habeas corpus,prohibition,certiorari
Ouster clauses and jurisdiction of civil courtsAnuja Aiyappan
The aim of the ppt is to understand what ouster clauses and jurisdiction of civil courts implies with respect to the Code of Civil Procedure applicable in and to do a study of the different provisions under the corresponding statutes.
If you face any problem regarding the research then you can communicate with me and I would appreciate your comments.
E-mail: devendrasrivastava36@gmail.com
divyashreenandini@gmail.com
A detailed presentation about types of Writs in the Constitution of India.
By: __________________
(For Law Laboratory)
Follow us on Instagram: @Law_Laboratory
Website: www.lawlaboratory.in
This PowerPoint presentation is a brief about the Writ of Mandamus. The PPt covers the crux of the writ of Mandamus, its types, its advantages, who and against whom it can be filed, and more. This presentation on writ of Mandamus is covered under Administrative Law
In this PPT various kinds of Writs have been discussed along with the relevant case laws. Also, relevant article such as Art 32 and Art 226 of the Indian Constitution have been explained.
Types of writ and difference between public interest litigation and private inteAmulya Arcania Nenlore
types of writ under indian constitution
difference between public interest litigation and private interest litigation-mandamus,habeas corpus,prohibition,certiorari
Ouster clauses and jurisdiction of civil courtsAnuja Aiyappan
The aim of the ppt is to understand what ouster clauses and jurisdiction of civil courts implies with respect to the Code of Civil Procedure applicable in and to do a study of the different provisions under the corresponding statutes.
If you face any problem regarding the research then you can communicate with me and I would appreciate your comments.
E-mail: devendrasrivastava36@gmail.com
divyashreenandini@gmail.com
This PowerPoint Presentation on Writs was shared by Mr Jayom Shah and me for conducting the Webinar in association with Lawsikho on April 22, 2020. The presentation is uploaded for the audience asking for a copy of the same.
Various Constituents of Legal Literature
Understanding the various parts of the statutes
Relevance of General Clauses Act, 1897 in the Interpretation of statutes
Various Parts & Sections of Gazette of India
Distinctiveness of ratio decidendi & obiter dicta
Relation of Logic to Laws
Concept of Deductive and Inductive Reasoning as Tools of Legal Reasoning
Military justice system continues to attract scrutiny from jurists, human rights activists and media. Absence of conventional wars anymore has perhaps eroded the need for military discipline enforcement and speedy trial norms. This presentation is an objective study of different issues in this regard.
Car Accident Injury Do I Have a Case....Knowyourright
Every year, thousands of Minnesotans are injured in car accidents. These injuries can be severe – even life-changing. Under Minnesota law, you can pursue compensation through a personal injury lawsuit.
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...Massimo Talia
This guide aims to provide information on how lawyers will be able to use the opportunities provided by AI tools and how such tools could help the business processes of small firms. Its objective is to provide lawyers with some background to understand what they can and cannot realistically expect from these products. This guide aims to give a reference point for small law practices in the EU
against which they can evaluate those classes of AI applications that are probably the most relevant for them.
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence LawyersHarpreetSaini48
Discover how Mississauga criminal defence lawyers defend clients facing weapon offence charges with expert legal guidance and courtroom representation.
To know more visit: https://www.saini-law.com/
In 2020, the Ministry of Home Affairs established a committee led by Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh, former Vice Chancellor of National Law University (NLU), Delhi. This committee was tasked with reviewing the three codes of criminal law. The primary objective of the committee was to propose comprehensive reforms to the country’s criminal laws in a manner that is both principled and effective.
The committee’s focus was on ensuring the safety and security of individuals, communities, and the nation as a whole. Throughout its deliberations, the committee aimed to uphold constitutional values such as justice, dignity, and the intrinsic value of each individual. Their goal was to recommend amendments to the criminal laws that align with these values and priorities.
Subsequently, in February, the committee successfully submitted its recommendations regarding amendments to the criminal law. These recommendations are intended to serve as a foundation for enhancing the current legal framework, promoting safety and security, and upholding the constitutional principles of justice, dignity, and the inherent worth of every individual.
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentationseri bangash
"Lifting the Corporate Veil" is a legal concept that refers to the judicial act of disregarding the separate legal personality of a corporation or limited liability company (LLC). Normally, a corporation is considered a legal entity separate from its shareholders or members, meaning that the personal assets of shareholders or members are protected from the liabilities of the corporation. However, there are certain situations where courts may decide to "pierce" or "lift" the corporate veil, holding shareholders or members personally liable for the debts or actions of the corporation.
Here are some common scenarios in which courts might lift the corporate veil:
Fraud or Illegality: If shareholders or members use the corporate structure to perpetrate fraud, evade legal obligations, or engage in illegal activities, courts may disregard the corporate entity and hold those individuals personally liable.
Undercapitalization: If a corporation is formed with insufficient capital to conduct its intended business and meet its foreseeable liabilities, and this lack of capitalization results in harm to creditors or other parties, courts may lift the corporate veil to hold shareholders or members liable.
Failure to Observe Corporate Formalities: Corporations and LLCs are required to observe certain formalities, such as holding regular meetings, maintaining separate financial records, and avoiding commingling of personal and corporate assets. If these formalities are not observed and the corporate structure is used as a mere façade, courts may disregard the corporate entity.
Alter Ego: If there is such a unity of interest and ownership between the corporation and its shareholders or members that the separate personalities of the corporation and the individuals no longer exist, courts may treat the corporation as the alter ego of its owners and hold them personally liable.
Group Enterprises: In some cases, where multiple corporations are closely related or form part of a single economic unit, courts may pierce the corporate veil to achieve equity, particularly if one corporation's actions harm creditors or other stakeholders and the corporate structure is being used to shield culpable parties from liability.
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government LiaisonMattGardner52
As an experienced Government Liaison, I have demonstrated expertise in Corporate Governance. My skill set includes senior-level management in Contract Management, Legal Support, and Diplomatic Relations. I have also gained proficiency as a Corporate Liaison, utilizing my strong background in accounting, finance, and legal, with a Bachelor's degree (B.A.) from California State University. My Administrative Skills further strengthen my ability to contribute to the growth and success of any organization.
2. ARTICLE 32: REMEDIED FOR ENFORCEMENT OF
RIGHTS CONFERRED BY THIS PART.
• 1. THE RIGHT TO MOVE THE SUPREME COURT BY APPROPRIATE PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF THE RIGHTS
CONFERRED BY THIS PART IS GUARANTEED.
• 2. THE SUPREME COURT SHALL HAVE POWER TO ISSUE DIRECTIONS OR ORDERS OR WRITS, INCLUDING WRITS IN THE
NATURE OF HABEAS CORPUS, MANDAMUS, PROHIBITION, QUO WARRANTO AND CERTIORARI, WHICHEVER MAY BE
APPROPRIATE, FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF ANY OF THE RIGHTS CONFERRED BY THIS PART.
• 3. WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO THE POWERS CONFERRED ON THE SUPREME COURT BY CLAUSES 1 &
2, PARLIAMENT MAY BY LAW EMPOWER ANY OTHER COURT TO EXERCISE WITHIN THE LOCAL
LIMITS OF ITS JURISDICTION ALL OR ANY OF THE POWERS EXERCISABLE BY THE SUPREME COURT
UNDER CLAUSE 2.
• 4. THE RIGHT GUARANTEED BY THIS ARTICLE SHALL NOT BE SUSPENDED EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE PROVIDED BY THIS
CONSTITUTION.
3. ARTICLE 33: POWER OF PARLIAMENT TO MODIFY THE RIGHTS
CONFERRED BY THIS PART IN THEIR APPLICATION TO FORCES, ETC.
PARLIAMENT MAY, BY LAW, DETERMINE TO WHAT EXTENT ANY OF THE RIGHTS CONFERRED BY THIS PART SHALL, IN THEIR
APPLICATION TO-
a. THE MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES; OR
b. THE MEMBERS OF THE FORCES CHARGED WITH THE MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC ORDER; OR
c. PERSONS EMPLOYED IN ANY BUREAU OR OTHER ORGANIZATION ESTABLISHED BY THE STATE FOR PURPOSES OF
INTELLIGENCE OR COUNTER INTELLIGENCE; OR
d. PERSONS EMPLOYED IN, OR IN CONNECTION WITH, THE TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS SET UP FOR THE PURPOSES OF
ANY FORCE, BUREAU OR ORGANIZATION REFERRED TO IN CLAUSES
A AND C,
BE RESTRICTED OR ABROGATED SO AS TO ENSURE THE ROPER DISCHARGE OF THEIR DUTIES AND THE MAINTENANCE OF
DISCIPLINE AMONG THEM.