In the last few years, neuroscience has been instrumental in helping the researchers to understand the nuances of human behavior. Its applications have helped companies to achieve immense success through successful marketing and leadership campaigns as they were able to better understand their consumers and employees and were therefore able to create products and strategies aligned to their needs and preferences. In the case of political thinking, however, and the expression of thoughts, preferences, and attitudes more generally, people often are unaware of how little insight they have into their own decision-making processes. In other words, they don’t know what they don’t know. It has been shown time and again that people confidently generate post-hoc narrative accounts of the thinking that supposedly went into a behavior, even when their behavior can be demonstrated to be driven by factors outside their conscious awareness. Thus, behavior is often driven by automatic mechanisms, which leads self-report of mental processes to be notoriously unreliable and susceptible to many forms of contamination.