COMPUTATIONAL STYLISTICS

Fatma Reyhan Balci            (0733166)
Auliar Najiihah Mehzabeen     (0818374)
Atiqah binti Abdul Shukor     (0831190)
Nursyahila binti Mohd Yusop   (0919788)
INTRODUCTION
   Analyzing the topic of a text (what it says) and
    style of a text (how it says it).

   Stylistic analysis is also fundamental to the
    recognition of uses of language which discern
    one author from another. An author's style is his
    signature.
COMPUTATIONAL STYLISTICS
   Study of patterns formed in particular texts,
    authors, genres, periods via computational
    methods.

   Through the use of computers, it should be
    possible to achieve more accurate detection and
    explanation of such linguistic patterns.
SCOPE OF COMPUTATIONAL STYLISTICS
   To find patterns in language that are linked to the
    processes of writing and reading.

   To find "style" in the wider sense, but which are
    not demonstrable without computational
    methods.

   For example: to examine patterns of association
    and difference among Shakespeare’s plays,
    based on their spoken dialogue.
EXAMPLES OF CORPUS USED FOR
          COMPUTATIONAL STYLISTIC
 Literary fields:
 Literary texts (play, poems, novel, short
  stories).

   Shakespeare’s works.

   Websites.

   Blogs.
CORPUS

 The Merchant Of Venice
 http://marialou.tripod.com/summary.html
RELEVANCE TO LANGUAGE LEARNING OR
           LANGUAGE RESEARCH
   To determine the language of literary works.
   The language research (literary language).
   To reveal differences among many types of
    dialogues or the language use.
   Language used in a special way; never reflects
    everyday speech and may depart from the
    grammatical and other norms of speech
   Literary language; quite unconscious, direct,
    sensitive, requires no reference to non-literary
    usage.
SYNOPSIS OF STUDY(EMPIRICAL STUDY)
   Title: “Now I am alone”
   Journal: A corpus stylistic approach to
    Shakespearian soliloquies, by Sean Murphy,
    Lancaster University.
   Research Questions:
   Objectives:
   1. To show what a corpus stylistic analysis can
    reveal about the linguistic nature of soliloquies as
    opposed to dialogue in Shakespeare’s plays.
   2. To what extent this methodological approach
    can highlight distinctions between comedies,
    histories and tragedies, and early plays as
    opposed to mid-career works.
METHODOLOGY
   12 Shakespeare’s plays were chosen by the
    researcher and soliloquies/aside document and
    interactional language were created to document
    each play and calculate the percentage of self
    talk.

   Secondly, Multilingual Corpus Toolkit was used to
    uncover further layers of meaning.

   And lastly, Wordsmith Tools was used to carry out
    concordances on selected findings to determine
    frequent collocations.
FINDINGS
   Self-talk vs. Interactional language-it has been
    found that there are overuses of interjections like
    “O..”, and the expressions of doubt “with” and
    “And yet…”.
   Comedic soliloquies-about love and relationships;
    tragic heroes contemplate religion and the
    supernatural; and historical figures seem to
    contemplate themselves.
   Soliloquiesers - give implicit stage directions,
    reveal future intentions, and generalize.
   In terms of topics-soliloquies appear to talk at
    great length about anatomy and physiology,
    thoughts, colours, love and deception.
REFLECTION
 Computational Stylistic is useful in
  analysing a texts, authors, genres and
  periods.
 This type of Corpus Linguistic is useful
  especially to Language students for they
  help students to understand the relations
  between texts, author and period.
 More research should be done in
  particular texts in computational stylistic
  to advance language learning.

Computational stylistic 24 april

  • 1.
    COMPUTATIONAL STYLISTICS Fatma ReyhanBalci (0733166) Auliar Najiihah Mehzabeen (0818374) Atiqah binti Abdul Shukor (0831190) Nursyahila binti Mohd Yusop (0919788)
  • 2.
    INTRODUCTION  Analyzing the topic of a text (what it says) and style of a text (how it says it).  Stylistic analysis is also fundamental to the recognition of uses of language which discern one author from another. An author's style is his signature.
  • 3.
    COMPUTATIONAL STYLISTICS  Study of patterns formed in particular texts, authors, genres, periods via computational methods.  Through the use of computers, it should be possible to achieve more accurate detection and explanation of such linguistic patterns.
  • 4.
    SCOPE OF COMPUTATIONALSTYLISTICS  To find patterns in language that are linked to the processes of writing and reading.  To find "style" in the wider sense, but which are not demonstrable without computational methods.  For example: to examine patterns of association and difference among Shakespeare’s plays, based on their spoken dialogue.
  • 5.
    EXAMPLES OF CORPUSUSED FOR COMPUTATIONAL STYLISTIC  Literary fields:  Literary texts (play, poems, novel, short stories).  Shakespeare’s works.  Websites.  Blogs.
  • 6.
    CORPUS  The MerchantOf Venice  http://marialou.tripod.com/summary.html
  • 7.
    RELEVANCE TO LANGUAGELEARNING OR LANGUAGE RESEARCH  To determine the language of literary works.  The language research (literary language).  To reveal differences among many types of dialogues or the language use.  Language used in a special way; never reflects everyday speech and may depart from the grammatical and other norms of speech  Literary language; quite unconscious, direct, sensitive, requires no reference to non-literary usage.
  • 8.
    SYNOPSIS OF STUDY(EMPIRICALSTUDY)  Title: “Now I am alone”  Journal: A corpus stylistic approach to Shakespearian soliloquies, by Sean Murphy, Lancaster University.  Research Questions:  Objectives:  1. To show what a corpus stylistic analysis can reveal about the linguistic nature of soliloquies as opposed to dialogue in Shakespeare’s plays.  2. To what extent this methodological approach can highlight distinctions between comedies, histories and tragedies, and early plays as opposed to mid-career works.
  • 9.
    METHODOLOGY  12 Shakespeare’s plays were chosen by the researcher and soliloquies/aside document and interactional language were created to document each play and calculate the percentage of self talk.  Secondly, Multilingual Corpus Toolkit was used to uncover further layers of meaning.  And lastly, Wordsmith Tools was used to carry out concordances on selected findings to determine frequent collocations.
  • 10.
    FINDINGS  Self-talk vs. Interactional language-it has been found that there are overuses of interjections like “O..”, and the expressions of doubt “with” and “And yet…”.  Comedic soliloquies-about love and relationships; tragic heroes contemplate religion and the supernatural; and historical figures seem to contemplate themselves.  Soliloquiesers - give implicit stage directions, reveal future intentions, and generalize.  In terms of topics-soliloquies appear to talk at great length about anatomy and physiology, thoughts, colours, love and deception.
  • 11.
    REFLECTION  Computational Stylisticis useful in analysing a texts, authors, genres and periods.  This type of Corpus Linguistic is useful especially to Language students for they help students to understand the relations between texts, author and period.  More research should be done in particular texts in computational stylistic to advance language learning.